CITY OF POWELL RIVER LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE STAGE 3 AGENDA. Date: 03 February 2011 at 1100 City Hall, Committee Room

Transcription

1 CITY OF POWELL RIVER LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE STAGE 3 AGENDA 1. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Date: 03 February 2011 at 1100 City Hall, Committee Room 2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: a) Minutes of the 06 January December 2011 Liquid Waste Management Steering Committee Meeting DELEGATIONS: a) None 4. CORRESPONDENCE: a) dated 14 January 2011 from Murray Coell, Minister of 5-6 Environment to Marion Blank regarding the development of a new Liquid Waste Management Plan for the City of Powell River and the public consultation process that has accompanied it 5. REPORTS: a) Minutes of the 19 January 2011 Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management Advisory (Stage 3) Committee meeting 7 10 b) Frequently Asked Questions To be distributed 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a) Public Consultation Plan b) Motion for addition of 4 th candidate site NEW BUSINESS: a) Facilitator for Public Consultation Meeting Verbal ADJOURNMENT

2 Page 1 of 4 06 January 2011 Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Steering (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No CITY OF POWELL RIVER Minutes of the Liquid Waste Management Steering (Stage 3) Committee meeting held in the Committee Room of the City Hall on Wednesday, 06 January 2011 at MEMBERS PRESENT: ALSO PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Councillor J. G. Palm, Chair Councillor D.A. Dee Councillor D.J. Formosa Councillor C.W. McNaughton Councillor A.J. Pinch Eugene Louie, Sliammon First Nation Stan Gisborne, Powell River Regional District Stan Westby, Chief Administrative Officer Cathy Griener, Acting City Clerk Richard Stogre, Manager of Engineering Services Frank D'Angio, Engineering Technologist Sheri Konkin, Recording Secretary Members of the Public Media Representatives Councillor M.J. Hathaway (absent with leave) 1. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Additions: 3. Delegation: a) Andy Davis Moved by Eugene Louie, seconded by Councillor McNaughton that the 06 January 2011 Liquid Waste Management Steering Committee Agenda be adopted as amended. CARRIED ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Correction to the 02 December 2010 Minutes: Item 4.c) on page 2 was revised as follows: By unanimous consent, the dated 28 November 2010 from Marion Blank regarding placement of new output pipe if mill shuts down was referred to staff for response. 3. DELEGATIONS: Andy Davis Moved by Councillor Dee, seconded by Councillor McNaughton that the minutes of the 02 December 2010 Liquid Waste Management Steering Committee meeting be adopted as amended. CARRIED Mr. Davis presentation included the following main points: Questioned why the Advisory committee was not informed of Dayton and Knight s letter dated January 2008 recommending against the Waste Transfer site; and who requisitioned their opinion on the suitability of the waste 1

3 Page 2 of 4 06 January 2011 Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Steering (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No transfer site. PRSC Land availability and concern with accountability for negotiating and representing City s interest inside the PRSC Limited Partnership. 4. CORRESPONDENCE: The Chair referred to the Question and Answer document included under Agenda item 5.e) for answers to Agenda correspondence. This document is posted under Liquid Waste Management Plan on the City s website where questions are recorded, answered and posted for information. a) b) c) d) Letter dated 29 November 2010 from Marion Blank regarding dated 30 November 2010 from Christine Dudgeon dated 06 December 2010 from Marion Blank dated 06 December 2010 from Judy Watts By unanimous consent, the letter dated 29 November 2010 from Marion Blank regarding a Dayton & Knight letter dated 17 January 2008 was received and referred to staff for response. By unanimous consent, the dated 30 November 2010 from Christine Dudgeon regarding an from Brian Walker of Dayton & Knight to Don MacKinnon dated 17 January 2008 was received and referred to staff for response. By unanimous consent, the dated 06 December 2010 from Marion Blank regarding best practices around odour control was received and referred to staff for response. By unanimous consent, the dated 06 December 2010 from Judy Watts regarding costing for best practice technology was received and referred to staff for response. 5. REPORTS: a) Minutes of the 30 November 2010 Advisory Committee meeting i) Best practices odour elimination Review of the minutes from 30 November 2010 Joint Local/Technical Advisory Committee meeting included: i) Best practices odour elimination: The Manager of Engineering Services supported the Advisory Committee s recommendation for best practices for odour elimination. Moved by Councillor Dee, seconded by Councillor Formosa that best practices for odour elimination be used in the overall design of a waste water treatment facility. CARRIED b) Minutes of the 14 December 2010 Advisory (Stage 3) Committee meeting i) Matrix: i) Matrix: Ranking of Candidate Sites Table The Manager of Engineering Services reviewed the changes made by the Advisory Committee to the weighting of factors in the Matrix: Ranking of Candidate Sites Table. 2

4 Page 3 of 4 06 January 2011 Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Steering (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No ii) Public Consultation Plan Moved by Councillor McNaughton, seconded by Councillor Formosa that the Ranking of Candidate Sites table as revised 14 December 2010 by the JointLocal/Technical Advisory Committee be approved. CARRIED ii) Public Consultation Plan Concern regarding acoustics at Dwight Hall Add 4 th stand alone candidate site to matrix Eugene Louie confirmed consultation with Tla amin (Sliammon First Nation) already took place on 08 November 2010 and if more consultation needs to take place, it is so granted. Staff to update the Public Consultation Plan to include: Meetings that have already taken place, including consultation with SFN Use Sliammon First Nation to refer to the land and Tla amin to refer to the people. Facilitator and Steering committee members will be present at 2 nd public meeting; not the Open House. Moved by Councillor McNaughton, seconded by Councillor Formosa that staff update the Public Consultation Plan to include the suggestions and resubmit to the Steering Committee for approval. CARRIED Councillor Punch left at 1204 c) Joint Local/Technical Advisory Committee meeting attendance d) Rating of Catalyst / Co-treatment option in the Matrix The acting City Clerk reported on policy regarding attendance at Committee meetings. Moved by Councillor Formosa, seconded by Councillor McNaughton that the Joint Local/Technical Advisory Committee terms of reference regarding committee member attendance remain as is, and that this report be received. CARRIED The Manager of Engineering Services reported on methods to include the Catalyst / Co-treatment option with the weighting of other candidate sited on the Matrix: Ranking of Candidate Sites. Dayton and Knight recommended two factors be considered for the co-treatment option in evaluating the cost of adding the Cityonly secondary treatment facilities in the event of mill closure: timing and risk of mill closure. Moved by Councillor Formosa, seconded by Councillor Dee that the co-treatment proposal be rated to reflect the risk of mill closure as 30%. DEFEATED Opposed: Councillor McNaughton Eugene Louie 3

5 Page 4 of 4 06 January 2011 Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Steering (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No Stan Gisborne Councillor Palm Moved by Councillor McNaughton, seconded by Stan Gisborne that when the Advisory Committee rates the candidate sites in the matrix, including the co-treatment option, that capital costs for these improvements be rated in today s dollars. Further, that the Advisory Committee rate the co-treatment option inclusive of pretreatment but not inclusive of backup sewage treatment proposed for the old clarifier; and the co-treatment proposal be rated to reflect the risk of mill closure at 15%. CARRIED Opposed: Councillor Formosa Staff was directed to add a fourth candidate site to the Matrix - Ranking of Candidate Sites Table: A sewage treatment plant to be constructed within the old clarifier on Catalyst property. e) Frequently Asked Questions #2 22 December 2010 The Frequently Asked Questions Sheet #2, dated 22 December 2010 was received. The Chair reminded that questions be forwarded to the City Clerk for addition to the Frequently Asked Questions Sheet and posting on the City s website. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a) None 7. NEW BUSINESS a) None 8. ADJOURNMENT: By unanimous consent the meeting was adjourned at CERTIFIED CORRECT: Sheri Konkin, Recording Secretary The next LWMP Steering Committee Meeting will be at 1100 on Thursday 03 February,

6 5

7 6

8 Page 1 of 4 19 January 2011 Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Advisory Committee (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No CITY OF POWELL RIVER Minutes of the Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management Advisory (Stage 3) Committee meeting held in the Committee Room of the City Hall on Tuesday, 19 January 2011 at MEMBERS PRESENT: Councillor J. G. Palm, Chair Banks, Clark Barkowski, Sarah Francescutti, Gino Gillies, Reg Greenwood, Frank Johnson, Milton Low, Mel Monk, Ross Nelson, Ann Ostensen, Ron Wrubleski, Ted Sisto Bosa, Dipl.T., Environmental Protection Officer, Ministry of Environment (via Skype) ALSO PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Members of the Public Media Representatives Al Gibb, OPUS DaytonKnight Consultants Ltd. Avtar Sundher, Government and Compliance Section Head, Ministry of Environment (via Skype) Cathy Greiner, Acting City Clerk Richard Stogre, Manger of Engineering Services Frank D Angio, Engineering Technologist Sheri Konkin, Recording Secretary Gemmill, Larry Krompocker, Don 1. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Moved by Gino Francescutti, seconded by Milton Johnson that the agenda of the Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management Advisory Committee meeting of 19 January 2011 be adopted. CARRIED 2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Moved by Clark Banks, seconded by Ann Nelson that the minutes of the 14 December 2010 Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management Advisory Committee meeting (Stage 3) be adopted. 3. DELEGATIONS: Merrilee Prior Powell River Water Watch CARRIED Ms. Prior appeared before the Committee to speak about her conclusions and questions after meeting with representatives of the ministries of Environment and Communities, Sport and Cultural Development which included: 7

9 Page 2 of 4 19 January 2011 Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Advisory Committee (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No CORRESPONDENCE: dated 14 January 2011 from Murray Coell, Minister of Environment, to Marion Blank 5. REPORTS: a) Minutes of the 06 January 2011 Steering Committee Funding is not only applicable for co-treatment, but other options as well If the mill were to shut down, discharge of sewage directly into the Strait of Georgia would not be accepted How can the consolidated Townsite plant still be an option if the land is not available and the City has no intention of expropriating? Pipeline route concerns included issues around digging up the Millennium Park Trail route and the need to cross the golf course lands, or possible conflict with development plans Complexities of co-treatment and missing information: Cost for best practices, the old clarifier and retro-fit, environmental impact and archaeological studies, and cost to replace Pump station H and pipeline to SET plant Concern that co-treatment will cost the same as a consolidated plant, thus the need for a stand alone plant anyway The dated 14 January 2011 from Murray Coell, Minister of Environment, to Marion Blank regarding the development of a new LWMP for the City of Powell River and the public consultation process that has accompanied it was received. The Chair reported on the minutes of the 06 January 2011 Steering Committee meeting. b) Frequently Asked Questions #2: 22 December 2010 The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Sheet #2, dated 22 December 2010 was received. The Chair reminded that questions should be forwarded to the City Clerk at info@cdpr.bc.ca for addition to the Frequently Asked Questions Sheet and posting on the City s website. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a) None 7. NEW BUSINESS a) Rating of Candidate Sites Al Gibb, OPUS DaytonKnight Consultants Ltd, reviewed powerpoint slides regarding Wastewater Treatment Matrix Selection. The main points covered were: Replacing existing Townsite and Westview treatment plants with a new consolidated WWTP located at Waste transfer site or Townsite WWTP; or alternatively opting for Joint treatment at Catalyst Mill. Cost summary of options By unanimous consent, Al Gibb was directed to update and correct the Cost Summary of Options page in the Wastewater Treatment Matrix Selection presentation to read: 8

10 Page 3 of 4 19 January 2011 Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Advisory Committee (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No Annual operating and maintenance costs for Options 3 and 4 to include the annual $750,000 fee payable to Catalyst Mill Option 4 to read: Retro-fit Old Clarifier for secondary treatment and to resubmit the Cost Summary of Options to the Advisory committee for review. The following Tables on the presentation slides will be updated as follows: Table 3-1: Candidate Site Ranking Matrix to read: Environmental: o Impact on terrestrial fauna, flora and their associated habitats o Impact on marine and aquatic fauna, flora and their associated habitats Table 3-1: Candidate Site Ranking Matrix and Table 4-1 Ranking of Candidate Sites to read: o Social: Public health and safety, impact on air quality By unanimous consent, the Advisory Committee agreed to meet on 01 February 2011 at 1300 at City Hall s rear parking lot to take a field trip to view each candidate site in order to rate the Social component on Table 4-1 Ranking of Candidate Sites. Moved by Clark Banks, seconded by Mel Low to reconsider the description and points assigned for the high constraint clarification for the Economic factor on Table 3-1: Candidate Site Ranking Matrix. By unanimous consent this motion was deferred until the next Advisory Committee meeting in order for staff to bring forward the former motion to be reviewed for amendment. By unanimous consent the Advisory Committee agreed the factors under Table 4-1: Ranking of Candidate Sites will be filled in by the following parties: Social: Advisory Committee while viewing candidate sites Regulatory: Staff and consultants to complete in consultation with Tla amin (Sliammon First Nation) Environmental: Consultants to provide scope of work and obtain a cost estimate Technical: Consultants Economic: Staff and Consultants The results will be brought back to the next Advisory Committee meeting for review and further discussion in order to finalize before submitting to the Steering Committee for approval. 9

11 Page 4 of 4 19 January 2011 Joint Local/Technical Liquid Waste Management (LWM) Advisory Committee (Stage 3) Committee Meeting Minutes File No ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Ross Monk, seconded by Milton Johnson that the meeting adjourn at 20:38. CERTIFIED CORRECT: Sheri Konkin, Recording Secretary The next LWMP Joint Local/Technical Advisory Meeting will be held at 1830 on Tuesday 15 February

12 CITY OF POWELL RIVER LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN STAGE 3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION PLAN 14 DECEMBER 2010 This document provides a summary of the Public Consultation Plan in support of the City of Powell River Liquid Waste Management Plan (LWMP) Stage Stage 2 LWMP Public Consultation Public consultation undertaken during completion of the Stage 2 LWMP was described in the District of Powell River Liquid Waste Management Plan Stage 2 report by Dayton & Knight Ltd., dated August As noted in that report, Provincial Guidelines require local governments that are undertaking a LWMP to strike at Technical Advisory Committee composed of municipal staff and invited representatives of senior government agencies (Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Community and Rural Development, Ministry of Health, Environment Canada, at least one non-government representative, at least one elected municipal official, others as applicable). Invited government agencies often limit their participation to correspondence and review of material, and do not attend Committee meetings. A Local Advisory Committee is also required to represent a wide range of interests in the community, and should include at least one member of the Technical Committee, municipal staff, the Ministry of Environment regional manager or designate, elected officials, local environmental groups, business, labour, rate-payer and consumer groups, school districts, local large waste generators, owner/operators of local private wastewater management systems, First Nations, and others as appropriate. A Steering Committee is often established comprising members of Council and municipal staff to guide the Advisory Committees and to make recommendations to Council. At the outset of the Stage 2 LWMP and in consultation with the Ministry of Environment, the City (then the District) of Powell River elected to combine the Local and Technical Advisory Committees into a Joint Advisory Committee (JAC) in order to minimize the number of meetings and to ensure a wider expression of views and improved communication. Seven meetings of the JAC and two workshops (one involving the JAC and the other involving municipal treatment plant staff) were held during Stage 2 (January, 2003 through March, 2004). A Public Open House was held on June 16, 2004 to present the draft Stage 2 LWMP to the members of the community at large. Display advertisements and articles in the local news media were published in support of the public consultation. The City provides documented minutes and record of all JAC meetings. Members of the public were invited to attend the meetings and ask questions and provide comment. Page 1 of 5 11

13 The main focus of the Stage 2 LWMP and the public consultation was selection of a suitable site for the construction of a new Consolidated Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) that would replace the existing Westview and Townsite facilities, with possible future connection of Wildwood. Before site selection was completed, all but one of the candidate sites identified as viable for the Consolidated WWTP was withdrawn from consideration by the property owner. The sole remaining site was the Waste Transfer Site, which was then adopted for the Stage 2 LWMP and presented at the Stage 2 Public Open House. The Stage 2 LWMP report incorporating the public consultation results was completed in August, The Stage 2 LWMP was approved by the regional manager of the Ministry of Environment by letter dated 20 January, Stage 3 LWMP Public Consultation The Joint Advisory Committee (JAC) for the Stage 3 LWMP re-assembled in The City conducted a review of JAC membership at that time, and all but two of the original members agreed to continue as members of the JAC (one had passed away and the other could not be contacted). At a meeting of the Steering Committee held on June 28, 2010, the membership of the JAC and the 2007 review of JAC membership were discussed in response to a concern expressed by a member of the community; no changes to Committee membership were recommended by the Steering Committee. This concern was forwarded to the JAC who in turn passed a motion recommending that the membership remain the same. The first JAC meeting for Stage 3 was held in June, 2007; the meeting was preceded by an orientation session for new members. Following the first JAC meeting for Stage 3, the LWMP was delayed pending resolution of available WWTP sites held by the Joint Venture, and of additional candidate sites put forward by members of Council for the Consolidated WWTP. The City was subsequently presented with an opportunity for joint treatment of the City s wastewater at the Catalyst Mill s WWTP. A two-phase study was undertaken, to allow the Joint Treatment option to be developed in sufficient detail to be compared to the options for a Consolidated WWTP developed earlier in the LWMP. Phase 1 was a feasibility study for the Joint Treatment option to determine if there were any significant technical or regulatory barriers to joint treatment; the Phase 1 Study findings indicated that joint treatment was feasible (see letter report from Dayton & Knight Ltd. to the City dated April 14, 2010). The Joint Treatment option is currently being developed to the concept design level in Phase 2 for comparison with the Consolidated WWTP option by the JAC. The first draft of the Phase 2 report (entitled City/Catalyst Mill Joint Wastewater Treatment ) describing concept design alternatives and costs for the Joint Treatment option was presented to the JAC on May 11, The meeting was posted as per the Page 2 of 5 12

14 City s Council Procedure Bylaw and presentations from two local groups (Cranberry ratepayers Association and CUPE) were included on the agenda. Members of the public were invited to attend the meeting and to ask questions and provide comment. Information provided to members of the JAC (e.g., the Phase 1 Feasibility Study letter report, and the first draft City/Catalyst Joint Wastewater Treatment Report) was also made available to the public for review, and comments can be submitted verbally or in writing to City staff or to the City s website via . A subsequent JAC meeting held on June 29, 2010 included delegations from one of the JAC members and from the Powell River Joint Water Watch Coalition, as well as tabling of a submission by CUPE and letters of support and opposition regarding the joint treatment option. The Public Consultation Plan and the Communications Plan were also discussed. Another JAC meeting was held on August 12, 2010, mainly as a round-table discussion among Committee members. At the JAC meeting held on 25 August 2010 the feasibility study was reviewed which identified that a second option was available as a contingency plan if the mill shut down which was the old primary clarifier.. The next JAC meeting will be held 08 November 2010 discussed the after publication of the second draft of the City/cCatalyst Joint Wastewater Treatment Report, which wasis currently being revised to address stakeholder comments on the first draft. It is expected that tthe second draft report will contained sufficient information for the JAC members to compare the Joint Treatment option with the Consolidated WWTP alternative, and toin order to make a recommendation to the Steering Committee regarding selection of the preferred option. On 30 November, 2010 the JAC meeting included another delegation from a member of the Powell River Water Watch Coalition and the Environmental Protection Officer from the Ministry of Environment also attended. The subtotals for each factor in the matrix were agreed upon and discussion included input from the JAC regarding the Public Consultation Plan to be referred to the Steering committee. On 02 December, 2010, another public delegation was received by the Steering Committee which included support for the JAC s recommendations for the Public Consultation Plan. In addition, four correspondence items from the public were received by the committee and referred to staff for response. At both committee meetings it was addressed that a Question and Answer document is maintained and posted on the City s website under Liquid Waste Management Plan and that all LWMP questions be forwarded to info@cdpr.bc.ca or to the City Clerk to be recorded, answered and posted for information to the City s website. Each successive Question and Answer sheet is included in each agenda package as well. Page 3 of 5 13

15 On 14 December 2010 the JAC meeting received another delegation from Powell River Water Watch Coalition regarding environmentally innovative public alternatives for municipal liquid waste management. Again, representatives from the Ministry of Environment attended via telephone conference. Revisions to the Matrix weighting and Public consultation Plan were reviewed and both referred to the Steering Committee for approval. On 06 January, 2011 the Steering committee received correspondence from four members of the public which included inquiries about best practices around odour control, a letter from Dayton & Knight dated 17 Jan 2008, an from Dayton & Knight to Don MacKinnon Jan 2008, and costing for best practice technology. Reports at this meeting included the Steering Committee motion that best practices for odour elimination be used in the overall design of a waste water treatment facility. Further suggestions from the Steering Committee were made regarding the Public Consultation Plan to be incorporated and resubmitted for approval. Another delegation was received from Powell River Water Watch at the JAC meeting held 19 January 2011 as well as an dated 14 Jan 2011 from Murray Coell, Minister of Environment, regarding the developments of a new LWMP and the public consultation process that has accompanied it. The Environmental Protection Officer and Head of Environmental Management Section were in attendance via Skype conferencing. Information regarding the Stage 3 LWMP and wastewater treatment will continue to be made available to members of the public, who continue to be invited to attend JAC and Steering committee meetings. After the results of the Matrix: Ranking of Candidate Sites Table have been received by the Steering committee, and prior to recommending approval of the Stage 3 LWMP, an Open House will be held at Dwight Hall including stations and booths attended by both Committee members for information purposes. At the beginning, there will be an introduction and overview by a guest speaker. This Open House will include the following: o Speaker o Written input at stations o Presentation material on display outlining pros and cons o Financial information o In attendance will be staff, two engineers from OPUS DaytonKnight Consultants Ltd., and members from both the Steering committee and JAC. Following the Open House, a second public meeting will be held at the Evergreen theatre, Dwight Hall or foyer of the Recreation complex to provide an opportunity for questions and answers. This will be an open microphone forum with a facilitator and panel of committee members. Members of the public will be invited to comment on the Page 4 of 5 14

16 Stage 3 LWMP by completing a questionnaire that will be available at the public meeting and on the City s website. The City has already untaken consultation with Tla amin (Sliammon First Nation) on 08 November 2010 and will undertake another consultation meeting with Tla amin prior to the Open House. (additional JAC meetings will be held as necessary to arrive at Committee consensus regarding the preferred option for wastewater treatment). Sliammon First Nation will also be consulted regarding preferred locations for facilities and pipeline routes and potential conflicts with archeological sites. Based on these meetings, the draft Stage 3 LWMP report will be prepared. Information regarding the Stage 3 LWMP and wastewater treatment will continue to be made available to members of the public, who continue to be invited to attend JAC meetings Prior to recommending approval of the Stage 3 LWMP an Open House will be held at Dwight Hall and will include the following: o large display of items in Dayton & Knight Draft Report No. 2; possibly including photos or slide show of site locations, force main options and matrix o pros and cons of each site o large Dayton & Knight presence, including facilitator o technical kept to a reasonable level o borrowing costs o history of sites Following the Open House, a second public meeting will be held to provide an opportunity for questions and answers. Members of the public will be invited to comment on the Stage 3 LWMP by completing a questionnaire that will be available at the public meeting and on the City s website. The City will undertake consultation with Sliammon First Nation. Public feedback will be incorporated into the Stage 3 LWMP report, which will then be presented to the JAC for discussion and endorsement to the Steering Committee. The Steering Committee will then meet to discuss the Stage 3 LWMP report, and, following the completion of any necessary changes, will recommend to Council that they formally adopt the Stage 3 LWMP report, which will then be submitted to the Minister for approval. Page 5 of 5 15

17 LWMP Steering Committee Meeting: 03 February 2011 Addition of fourth candidate site Motion for Consideration: Move that a fourth candidate site be added to the Ranking of Candidate Sites Table: Retro-fit Old Clarifier for Secondary Treatment Immediately. 16