Title: A Recent History of Nationalism and the Military in China. Date: November 2015 Institution name/journal where submitted: McGill University

Transcription

1 Title: A Recent History of Nationalism and the Military in China Author: Ahmed Khan Date: November 2015 Institution name/journal where submitted: McGill University The use of this database indicates agreement to the terms and conditions Academia is a database that promotes the free exchange of ideas and scholarly work, setting a platform on which to foment and improve student discourse

2 The Recent History of Nationalism and the Military in China Throughout history, and particularly in China the military has often been an indicator of national integrity and unity. For a country as large and diverse as China, the military has historically been one of the few executive arms of the central government and by extension a measure of the strength of the country s nationalist sentiment. The military is not merely a symptom of the health of nationalist ideology. The regime of the day has based its actions and policy around the prevalent military systems available to it and the development of military systems and strategies has been inextricably tied to the ideology of the governing party. The establishment of a strong, modern and centralized regular military was essential for the development of Chinese nationalism from a popular sentiment to the predominant political ideology of the central government. This was true of Sun Yat Sen s Republic, the Guomindang (GMD) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This trend has been seen ever since the Qing dynasty modernized the military following defeat at the hands of European powers. Throughout the early twentieth century there has been a clear link between the development of the military, largely the army until the Korean War, and the growth of nationalist sentiment in China.

3 The only period between this span where nationalism was on the decline was during the Warlord Era. After the death of Yuan Shikai in 1916 the fight for power weakened the sense of a Chinese national identity as the infighting of the warlord era discouraged nationalism, stoking ethnic sentiments instead. This coincided with devolution in military capability. However following Chiang Kai Shek s Northern Expedition of the Guomindang (GMD) either beat or incorporated the warlords, nominally united China and established the National Revolutionary Army. From that point on, despite the decades long power struggle between the CCP and the GMD, since the eventual establishment of the People s Republic of China and the People s Liberation Army, nationalism has only grown in China. Simultaneously the Chinese military has also grown from irregular, ill-trained poorly armed militias to an efficient, battle hardened and increasingly better equipped and trained force. The concepts of a modern one China and militarism, which is much older, have been tied inextricably with each other. While the birth of the modern Chinese military is accepted to be in 1911 with the Republican Revolution and the establishment of the "New Army", its roots go back to the Qing Dynasty in the 19th century. [1] Before the Opium Wars the military was used to establish the writ of the empire and squash dissidence. The ethnically Manchu Qing held on to power over majority Han China by a combination of feudal alliances and military power. Given that this was the primary prerogative of the armies, their

4 methods were not nationalistic at all and instead fueled regionalism. The turning point for these methods was the Opium Wars where China faced off against the predominant world powers of the day, France, Britain and Russia. The outcomes of the wars were humiliating for China, as it was carved up and split between the European powers. This sparked two major changes in China that would contribute greatly towards the rise of nationalism. First, the Qing dynasty embarked on a massive modernization campaign for the military, a development geared towards dealing with foreign aggression. Secondly the actions of the European powers gave rise to nationalist sentiment in the Han majority. This new and fast spreading sentiment resulted first in Xinhai Revolution of 1911, where early nationalist politicians led by Sun Yat Sen and Yuan Shikai were able to convince Last Emperor Puyi to step down thus ending two thousand years of imperial rule in China. There were several nationalistic characteristics of the new republic, chief among which was the attempt at racial integration. The republic adopted the Five Races Under One Union banner as its flag. The five colors represented the five main ethnicities of China, Han, Manchu, Mongol, Muslim and Tibetan. Moreover, Sun Yat Sen and other leaders called for racial integration at the frontiers of China.

5 The republic also made use of the New Armies developed and trained at the end of the Qing by Yuan Shikai himself. In line with the prevalent nationalist sentiment in the intelligentsia and continuing with military development in the final years of the Qing dynasty, various New Armies were integrated to form the Chinese Army by 1911, although the force was still known popularly as the New Army. Nearly two - thirds of this force was composed of Yuan Shikai s own Beiyang Army [2]. Sun Yat Sen had brought in Yuan Shikai into the government because of his close relations with the military, as it was seen as essential to the Nationalist and Republican causes. Initially Yuan Shikai s proximity to the military leadership maintained stability in the young republic, effectively squashing out dissidence from the south. However, Yuan Shikai s decision to declare himself emperor and his death soon after in 1916 led to weaker control of the state over the New Army. The New Army fell apart as there was no leadership that could hold it together, and the republican government of Sun Yat Sen was reduced to the role of a figurehead. The army degenerated to its old pattern, with loyalties shifting back to regional and even more local ties. The New Army fragmented, as did China as a whole, dominated more and more by a group of warlords. These men, such as Wu Peifu and Sun Chuanfang, were more interested in consolidating power in their own regions and building private armies than they were in Chinese Nationalism. This was essentially the end of the Republic and ushered in what came to be known as the Warlord Era.

6 The warlords had their origins in the Qing dynasty. Their armies originated from the Qing s use of regional militias and forces, a carryover of the feudal era. Individual militias were formed from men of the same province. While this was largely for the benefit of communication within soldiers, this encouraged regionalist tendencies and sentiments. The warlords had been brought together after the dissolution of the Qing dynasty, however their nationalist sympathies were tested by Yuan Shikai s illadvised move to become emperor in 1915 and dissolved completely with his death in Starting from the South, dissent soon spread throughout the mainland and even Yuan Shikai s own Beiyang Army split into two cliques. The Warlord Era continued until Chiang Kai Shek s Northern Expedition ( ) either incorporated the warlords into the regular army or beat them to submission and nominally reunited China. The Warlord Era is interesting most of all for being the only period in China during the 20 th century that saw a deterioration in military capability for the country. The deterioration of military order and standardization led towards a shift from nationalist ideology to more regional sympathies within the army. Loyalties shifted backwards to positions similar to the Qing dynasty, and a split between the North and South would persist till the Northern Expedition. This only reinforces the argument that deterioration in the military leads to devolution from nationalism to regionalism. The Warlord Era is of particular interest because the deterioration of the central army led to a long period of increased regionalism and political factionalism [5], yet it was

7 precisely these conditions that took Chinese Nationalism to the populace and thus reinforced political forces with Nationalistic agendas, specifically the GMD and CCP. Sun Yat Sen s negotiations with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) resulted in the First United Front in 1922, with the aim of ending the fiefdom of the warlords [3]. Though the First United Front was short lived, breaking down over fighting and distrust between the GMD and the CCP it remains important. Both the GMD and the CCP, by virtue of entering the alliance, accepted that regionalism had to come to an end, and a nationalist reunification was more important than fighting each other. This was even more significant as by 1922 these were the two largest political forces in the country. Amidst all this jousting for power another development was underway that would lay the seeds for a popular nationalist sentiment in China. It began on the 4 th of May 1919 with a set of student demonstrations in Beijing protesting the conditions imposed on China under the Treaty of Versailles. In what grew to become the New Culture Movement, the May Fourth Movement was crucial in shifting Chinese Nationalism from a concept largely limited to the intellectual elite to a populist sentiment. As Zarrow states, the movement represented an entirely new type of grass roots politics based largely on nationalistic feelings. [4] The broader New Culture Movement was also important for accelerating a transition from traditional Confucian ideals to modern global and western values, a process that had begun with the removal of the Qing in 1911.

8 A key component of squashing the warlords and establishing power at the ce ntre was developing a strong centralized army. This led to the development of two parallel forces. For the GMD it meant the establishment of the National Revolutionary Army (NRA) in Developed for Chiang Kai Shek s Northern Expedition, this grew into the primary military arm of the GMD during the civil war, and later developed into the Republic of China (Taiwan) military. The CCP simultaneously established the People s Liberation Army. This originated as a peasant guerilla force evolved into China s armed forces and the largest conventional military organization in the world. While this parallel development of two armies inevitably led to conflict and eventually to all out civil war, there are key similarities between the two. An example of this is the Whampoa Military Academy. Developed by Sun Yat Sen in the early twenties with Soviet help, the academy aimed to lessen China s reliance on warlords for military leadership, and instead train a new generation of professional officers to lead ever evolving armed forces in China. It was also a symbol of GMD-CCP cooperation, as both parties worked together on the project. [6] The academies influence on nationalism and politics is even greater because the academy trained both GMD and CCP officers and would have a great effect on the ideologies of both the PLA and the ROC Army. [7] During the second Sino-Japanese War ( ) the GMD and the CCP again collaborated, this time to fight the Japanese. While the cooperation was less than

9 whole hearted, they reinforced the belief that China, and Chinese Nationalism came first for both parties. Following the eventual Chinese victory, with allied assistance, China again erupted into civil war. By 1948 however, the CCP was able to use its massive peasant support base and lessons learnt from fighting the Japanese to route the GMD forces to the island of Formosa and establish a government in Beijing. While the GMD was far better equipped, it appears that their leadership was unable to make use of it. As General Barr stated Their military debacles can be attributed to the worst leadership in the world and a complete loss of will to fight. [7] The fight was far from over for the PLA. Within a few short years of its birth, the People s Republic of China had to face the American forces in Korea ( ), the Indians in the Sino-Indian War (1962) and the Vietnamese (1979). This was accompanied by a decades long border conflict with the Soviet Union. But Mao and the CCP were able to use these conflicts to build and cultivate a stronger Chinese identity. This sort of almost militant nationalism definitely contributed towards the development of a stronger, more cohesive and unified China. The PLA s doctrine changed considerably after Mao s death, much in keeping with other policies in the nation. Mao had seen China under existential threat. Along these lines, we can see that Mao invested heavily in developing the organizational and technological prowess of the armed forces, evidenced by the heavy investment into space and missile technology [8]

10 Following Mao s death there was a massive revision in this policy. In Mao s China, the assumption was that war, when it came, would be total and global in scope, and the resulting devastation would also be total. Despite Maoist bravado, this tended to make China think rather carefully before it used force because of the real dangers of escalation. Today, from Beijing s perspective, the dominant trends in the world are supposed to be peace and development. Furthermore, the PLA s current doctrine of limited war under high technology conditions also makes it likely that Beijing will see conflict as an acceptable risk. [9] This has spawned, firstly a renewed nationalistic feeling among the Chinese populace, and secondly an almost ultra-nationalistic fervor in the military combined with a redistribution of military investments to first the air force, and more recently the navy, [the] PLAAF is concentrating on shifting from positional, defensive operations to mobile, offensive operations. This reflects China s shift from an existentially defensive doctrine in most of the 20th century to a more confident, hegemonic, and aggressive attitude recently, which reflects their newfound power on the world stage [10] On the basis of empirical evidence throughout the last century, it is reasonable to conclude that there is a direct link between Chinese Nationalism and the development of a strong, centralized and modern military. The concept of Chinese Nationalism a modern one, it arose near the end of the 19 th century. Nationalism throughout the first half of the 20 th century seems to have been only as healthy as the army at the

11 time. The Warlord Era reinforces this notion as the only period of the 20 th century that Chinese Nationalism was on the decline coincided with the only period of deterioration in the military. China has gone from being a loosely federated empire to a strongly unified nation with strict centralization. It has also gone from being a poor country at the mercy of western powers to a leading economic power. A Chinese identity was cultivated, a sense of the Chinese nation developed. That, simultaneously, a regular Chinese military was formed, developed from a group of ill-trained militias to one of the largest, most battle hardened and centralized military forces in the world is not a coincidence.

12 Notes Throughout this essay the term nationalist does not refer to the GMD alone, but rather to the political ideology. Therefore Sun Yat Sen s Republic, the GMD and the CCP are all considered to be nationalists References 1 Edmund S. K. Fung, The Military Dimension of the Chinese Revolution: The New Army and Its Role in the Revolution of 1911 (Vancouver,: University of British Columbia Press, 1980). Pp Ralph L. Powell, The Rise of Chinese Military Power, (Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press, 1955) 3 Ibid 4 Zarrow, Peter. China in War and Revolution, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, Print. Pp Ibid. Pp PLA History, online 7 Ibid. 7. Bianco, Origins of Chinese Revolution, , Stanford University Press, 1971, Print. Pp Burkitt et Al, The Lessons of History: The People s Liberation Army at 75, Washinton: The Strategic Studies Institute, 2003, Pp Ibid. Pp Ibid. Pp. 90

13 Bibliography A History of the Modern Chinese Army, Xiabong Li, New York, Johns Hopkins University, Print Van De Van, Hans. War and Nationalism in China: London: RoutledgeCurzon, Print. Meisner, Maurice J. Mao's China and After: A History of the People's Republic. New York: Free, Print. Zarrow, Peter. China in War and Revolution, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, Print. Burkitt et Al, The Lessons of History: The People s Liberation Army at 75, Washinton: The Strategic Studies Institute, 2003, Bianco, Origins of Chinese Revolution, , Stanford University Press, 1971, Print PLA History, , Online.