The Minutes of the 21st Meeting of the Vaughan Committee of Adjustment for the year 2012 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, :04 p.m.

Transcription

1 The Minutes of the 21st Meeting of the Vaughan Committee of Adjustment for the year 2012 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2012 Present at the meeting were: 6:04 p.m. J. Cesario Chair A. Perrella Vice Chair L. Fluxgold H. Zheng Members of Staff present: Todd Coles, Secretary-Treasurer Mark Chiovitti, Assistant to the Secretary-Treasurer Mark Antoine, Planner Francesco Morea, Plans Examiner INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM REPORTS That the addendum reports be incorporated into the minutes and be on view at the back of the room in the Report Book. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST None. ADOPTION OR CORRECTION OF MINUTES THAT the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment Meeting of Thursday, October 11, 2012, be adopted as circulated. THAT the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment Meeting of Thursday, October 25, 2012, be adopted as circulated. It was noted that H. Zheng did not attend the October 11, 2012 meeting and could not approve the meeting minutes. Seconded by A. Perrella THAT the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment Meeting of Thursday, October 11, 2012, be adopted as circulated. ADJOURNMENTS AND/OR DEFERRALS On November 8, 2012 an was received from Gerry Borean representing the owner Alex Pizzimenti, requesting that item 6, File No. A296/12 ALEX PIZZIMENTI, be ADJOURNED to the meeting of November 22, 2012, to allow time to address the Planning Department comments. On October 31, 2012 an was received from Colin Ruskin, the agent, requesting that item 19, File No. A260/12 GAIL RUSKIN, be further ADJOURNED to the meeting of December 6, 2012, to allow time for the Planning Department to review the woodlot study. On November 1, 2012 an was received from Andrew Ip, the agent, requesting that item 22, File No. A285/12 LCT INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED, be further ADJOURNED to the meeting of November 22, 2012, to allow time for staff to review the recently submitted parking study. Page 1 of 14

2 ADJOURNMENTS AND/OR DEFERRALS CONT D That items 6, File No. A296/12 ALEX PIZZIMENTI, be ADJOURNED to the meeting of November 22, That item 19, File No. A260/12 GAIL RUSKIN, be further ADJOURNED to the meeting of December 6, That item 22, File No. A285/12 LCT INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED, be further ADJOURNED to the meeting of November 22, 2012, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTIONS None. MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: Item # 1 FILE NUMBER: A334/12 DAOUD KLANA Part of Lot 5, Concession 3 (Lot 18, Registered Plan 2468, municipally known as 43 Baldwin Avenue, Concord). The subject lands are zoned R1V Old Village, Residential Zone and OS1 Open Space Conservation under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the continued construction of a second storey addition to a single family dwelling, as follows: 1. To permit an interior sideyard setback of 0.72 metres to the dwelling. 2. To permit an interior sideyard setback of 0.26 metres to the concete patio. 3. To permit a front yard setback of 9.44 metres to the dwelling. 1. A minimum interior sideyard setback of 1.5 metres is permitted. 2. A minimum interior sideyard setback of 1.5 metres is permitted. 3. A minimum front yard setback of 9.89 metres is permitted. Mario Faraone, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant gave a brief submission regarding the request. During the discussions between the Committee and Mr. Faraone, the Committee advised the Mr. Faraone of the Planning Department s decision to not support the second variance of the side yard setback to the concrete patio. Mr. Faraone agreed to remove the second variance from the application. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the THAT Application No. A334/12, DAOUD KLANA, be APPROVED AS AMENDED, in accordance with the attached sketch subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant successfully receive a revision to their Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit (Permit No. C ) to verify that the grading works associated with the additional driveway area has no adverse impacts on the Regional Storm Flood Plain to the satisfaction of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 2. The applicant submit the variance application fee of $300 payable to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 3. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. (PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TIME PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED IN ANY WAY, FAILURE TO MEET THIS DEADLINE WILL RESULT IN REQUIRING A NEW APPLICATION AND FEE.) Page 2 of 14

3 Item # 2 FILE NUMBER: A335/ ONTARIO INC. Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, (Parcel G & H, Registered Plan 449, municipally known as 86 and 92 Woodbridge Avenue, and 30 & 36 Clarence Street, Woodbridge). The subject lands are zoned RA3 (H), Apartment Residential Zone with a Holding Provision and subject to the provisions of Exception Number 9(1315) under By-Law 1-88 as amended. To permit the construction of a 125 unit condominium building. 1) To permit a minimum landscape strip of 0.0 metres in width around the periphery of an outdoor parking area and within the lot on which the said parking area is situated. Also to not provide screening consisting of either a landscaped earth berm or evergreen hedgerow with a minimum height of 1.2 metres. 2) That only the residential parking ratio of parking spaces/unit (including visitor parking) and commercial parking ratio of 3.0 parking spaces/100m2 G.F.A be applied towards the parking requirements of the site (eliminating the minimum 210 spaces as per the by-law). 1) A minimum 3.0 metre wide landscape strip is required around the periphery of an outdoor parking area within the lot on which the said parking area is situated. Also, screening consisting of either a landscape earth berm or evergreen hedgerow with a minimum height of 1.2 metres is required. 2) A minimum of 210 parking spaces shall be provided on the site and shall be calculated as follows; residential at spaces/unit which includes visitor parking; and commercial at 3.0 spaces/100m2 G.F.A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Other Planning Act Applications The land which is the subject in this application was also the subject of another application under the Planning Act: Zoning By-law Amendment - Z removal of the "H" Holding symbol John Zipay, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant. Nadia Meffe, 18 Rosebury Lane, Woodbridge ON, L4L 3Z2 appeared in opposition and expressed her concerns with the zero lot line set back as well as with the number of parking spaces being reduced. A request for decision was received from Nadia Meffe, 18 Rosebury Lane, Woodbridge ON, L4L 3Z2. During the discussions between the Committee, Mr. Zipay and Mrs. Meffe, the Committee asked Mr. Antoine from the Planning Department to speak to Mrs. Meffe s concerns. Mr. Antoine advised the zero lot line set back was minor as it only applied to a very small section of the property. With regards to the reduction of the parking spaces, again the variance was minor in nature reducing the total amount of parking spaces from 210 to 201. No one else appeared before the Committee in support of or in opposition to the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the THAT Application No. A335/12, ONTARIO INC, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant submit the variance application fee of $500 payable to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, if required to the satisfaction of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; 2. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.(PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TIME PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED IN ANY WAY, FAILURE TO MEET THIS DEADLINE WILL RESULT IN REQUIRING A NEW APPLICATION AND FEE.) Page 3 of 14

4 Item # 3 FILE NUMBER: A336/12 ELVIO & ROSA RASILE Part of Lot 26, Concession 8 (Lot 14, Registered Plan 65M-3377, municipally known as 309 Treelawn Blvd, Kleinburg). The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential under By-Law 1-88 as amended and further subject to exception 9(563). To permit the construction of a cabana related to a single family dwelling, as follows: 1) 0.6m minimum interior sideyard setback to cabana 2) 3.41m maximum cabana height (11.2feet). 3) 13m2 maximum cabana area. 1) 1.5m minimum interior sideyard setback to cabana 2) 2.5m maximum cabana height. 3) 10m2 maximum cabana area. No one appeared on behalf of the applicant. The Committee recommended that the item be stood down to allow the applicant or agent to appear before the Committee and, the opportunity to speak to the Planning Department s concerns. THAT Application No. A336/12, ELVIO & ROSA RASILE, be STOOD DOWN, to be heard later in the meeting. Item # 4 FILE NUMBER: A337/12 ANTONINA & PAUL CORNACCHIA Part of Lot 12, Concession 7 (Lot 22, Registered Plan 65M-2518, municipally known as 16 Sesame Court, Woodbridge). The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential Zone and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(542) under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the construction of a gazebo related to a single family dwelling, as follows: 1. To permit 1.22m minimum rear yard setback to the gazebo. 2. To permit 3.8m maximum gazebo height. 3. To permit 37.92m2 maximum gazebo floor area. 1. Minimum rear yard setback of 7.5m. 2. Maximum accessory building height of 2.5m. 3. Maximum accessory building floor area of 10m2. Paul Cornacchia, the applicant and Anthony Lombardi, the agent appeared and gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the THAT Application No. A337/12, ANTONINA & PAUL CORNACCHIA, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Page 4 of 14

5 Item # 5 FILE NUMBER: A338/12 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ONTARIO INC. Part of Lot 16, Concession 5 (Lot 2, Registered Plan 65M-3849, municipally known as 125, 135, 145 Hawkview Blvd., Vaughan) The subject lands are zoned C4, Neighbourhood Commercial Zone and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(1180) under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the continued construction of a dry cleaning establishment. 1. To permit a Dry Cleaning Establishment with processing. 1. A Dry Cleaning Depot (drop-off, no processing) is permitted Other Planning Act Applications The land which is the subject in this application was also the subject of another application under the Planning Act: Consent Application B002/11 Approved February 10, 2011 (Creation of a new lot) Minor Variance Application A146/12 - WITHDRAWN, May 31/12 - (To permit the continued construction of a dry cleaning establishment.) A182/11 Approved July 21, 2011 (setbacks, parking and number of outdoor patio, variances). Nicole Sampogna, Evans Planning, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the THAT Application No. A338/12, ONTARIO INC., be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Item # 6 FILE NUMBER: A339/12 MARCELLA CARELLI Part of Lot 16, Concession 8, (Lot 27, Registered Plan 65M-3303, municipally known as 20 Masi Court, Woodbridge). The subject lands are zoned RV3, Residential Urban Village Zone Three and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(988) under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the construction of an inground pool and the location of the pool and equipment, as well as the maintenance of an A/C unit. 1. To permit 0.61m minimum rear yard setback to pool. 2. To permit 0.66m interior side yard setback to pool equipment. 3. To permit 0.66m interior side yard setback to air conditioning unit. 1. Minimum 1.5m rear yard setback to a pool. 2. Minimum 1.2m interior side yard setback to pool equipment. 3. Minimum 1.2m interior side yard setback to a central air conditioning unit. Marcella Carelli, the applicant appeared and gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the Page 5 of 14

6 Item # 6 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A339/12 MARCELLA CARELLI MOVED by H. Zheng Seconded by A. Perrella THAT Application No. A339/12, MARCELLA CARELLI, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Item # 7 FILE NUMBER: A340/12 DOROTHY STALONY-PANZICA Part of Lot 23, Concession 4 (Lot 170, of Registered Plan 65M-3106 municipally known as 25 Burnhaven Ave, Maple) The subject lands are zoned R3, Residential Zone Three and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(840) under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the maintenace of the existing pool equipment. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.6 metres to the pool equipment. A minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres is permitted. Chad Geense, Aveco Pools, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the Seconded by L. Fluxgold THAT Application No. A340/12, DOROTHY STALONY-PANZICA, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Item # 8 FILE NUMBER: A341/12 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: IMPROVE INC. C/O OLEG CHEKHTER Part of Lots 2 & 3, Concession 4, (municipally known as 7250 Keele Street, Concord) The subject lands are zoned PBM1, Parkway Belt Restricted Industrial Zone under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the construction of an accessory building. 1. To permit a lot coverage of 32.0% (including accessory building). 2. To permit a rear yard setback of 2.03 metres to an accessory building. 3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.80 metres to an accessory building. 1. A maximum lot coverage of 25% is permitted. 2. A minimum rear yard setback of 15.0 metres is required. 3. A minimum interior side yard setback of 6.0 metres is required. A068/12 & A073/11 Page 6 of 14

7 Item # 8 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A341/12 IMPROVE INC. C/O OLEG CHEKHTER Tim Jessop, Weston Consulting, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the THAT Application No. A341/12, IMPROVE INC. C/O OLEG CHEKHTER, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Previously adjourned SINE DIE at the March 1, 2012 meeting Item # 9 FILE NUMBER: A195/ ONTARIO LTD. Part of Lot 19, Concession 8 (municipally known as 9732 Highway #27, Kleinburg). The subject lands are zoned OS1, Open Space Conservation under By-Law 1-88 as amended. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: To permit the construction of a restaurant drive-thru as follows: 1) To permit an Eating Establishment, Convenience with drive through. 1) An Eating Establishment, Convenience with drive through is not a permitted use. A135/86 - Refused June 4, 1986 A031/03 - Refused May 15, 2003 Nicole Sampogna, Evans Planning, the agent and Dr. Battista, the applicant, gave a submission regarding the request. They have at this point taken their site plan application to the Ontario Municipal Board, and requested to have the minor variance application approved with a condition. During the discussions between the Committee, Miss Sampogna and Mr. Battista, the Committee acknowledged the comments received from staff did not support the application and would oblige the applicant with a decision. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought cannot be considered minor and are not desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will not be maintained. THAT Application No. A195/11, ONTARIO LTD., be REFUSED, in accordance with the attached sketch Page 7 of 14

8 Previously adjourned from the July 26, 2012, September 6, 2012, October 11, 2012 & October 25, 2012 meetings Item # 10 FILE NUMBER: A224/12 MARCO DELUCA LTD. Part of Lot 6, Concession 8 (Block A, Registered Plan M-1875 (M-1489), municipally known as 5732 Highway #7, Units 31-33, Woodbridge). The subject lands are zoned EM1, Prestige Employment Area under By-Law 1-88 as amended and further subject to exception 9(208) and 9(261). To permit the maintenance of a banquet hall for units 31, 32 & 33. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1) m2 maximum banquet hall area. 2) Units 33, 32 and 31 used for a banquet hall. 3) 254 parking spaces minimum (provided). 1) m2 maximum banquet hall area. 2) Unit 33 used for a banquet hall. 3) 602 parking spaces minimum (required). Committee of Adjustment File #: A B Marco DeLuca, the applicant appeared, and advised the Committee he was awaiting the arrival of his engineer. The Committee recommended that the item be stood down to await the arrival of Mr. DeLuca s engineer. THAT Application No. A224/12, MARCO DELUCA LTD., be STOOD DOWN, to be heard later on in the meeting. Previously adjourned from the August 23, 2012 & October 25, 2012 meetings Item # 11 FILE NUMBER: A246/12 A. LOFRANCO HOLDINGS INC. Part of Lot 31, Concession 1 (Lot 50, Registered Plan 3977, municipally known as 20 Oakbank Road, Thornhill). The subject lands are zoned R1V, Residential, subject to Exception 9(662), under Bylaw 1-88, as amended. To permit the construction a proposed in ground pool, cabana, covered lounge and porch area, and to permit the maintenance of an existing wetbar. 1. To permit a cabana with a maximum area of m To permit a cabana with a maximum height of 4.5 m to the peak and 3.0 m to the underside of the eave. 3. To permit a minimum rear yard setback of 2.1 m to a cabana exceeding 10 m2. 4. To permit a minimum area of 307 m 2 soft landscaping in the rear yard (53.64%). 5. To permit the maintenance of the existing covered accessory structure partially located in the interior side yard. 6. To permit the maintenance of an accessory structure in the interior side yard with a maximum height of 3.7 m. 7. To permit the maintenance of an accessory structure in the interior side yard with a maximum area of 32.7 m To permit the maintenance of an accessory structure in the interior side yard with a minimum interior side yard setback of 0.30 m. 9. To permit the total area of all accessory structures to equal a maximum of 101.8m To permit an existing driveway width of 6.7 m. 11. To permit a maximum lot coverage of 24.2% (dwelling = 18.6%, cabana = 3.8%, interior accessory structure = 1.8%). Page 8 of 14

9 Item # 11 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A246/12 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A. LOFRANCO HOLDINGS INC. 1. An accessory structure with a maximum area of 10 m 2 is permitted at this location. 2. A maximum accessory structure height of 2.5 m is permitted at this location. 3. A minimum rear yard setback of 9.0 m is required. 4. A minimum area of m 2 soft landscaping is required in the rear yard (60% of m 2 ). 5. Accessory structures must be located in the rear yard. 6. A maximum height of 2.5 m is permitted. 7. A maximum area of 10 m 2 is permitted. 8. A minimum interior side yard setback of 1.5 m is required. 9. A total maximum area of 67 m 2 is permitted for all accessory structures. 10. A maximum driveway width of 6 m is permitted. 11. A maximum lot coverage of 20% is permitted. Other Planning Act Applications The land which is the subject in this application was also the subject of another application under the Planning Act: Minor Variance Application A191/03 APPROVED July 24, 2003 (min. front yard encroachment 3.16m NOT 1.8m) A314/02 APPROVED August 29, 2002 (min. front yard setback 10.13m NOT 12.88m) Scott W. McCraig, Eden Tree Design Inc., the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant. Tony Evangelista, 53 Bentworth Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M6A 1P5 appeared in support of the application. No one else appeared before the Committee in support of or in opposition to the request. A request for decision was received from Tony Evangelista, 53 Bentworth Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M6A 1P5. During the discussions between the Committee, Mr. McCraig and Mr. Evangelista, the Committee acknowledged the concerns brought forth by Mr. Evangelista with respect to a landscape plan. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the THAT Application No. A246/12, A. LOFRANCO HOLDINGS INC., be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch and subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Owner shall submit a full-scale landscape plan (indicating all existing and proposed landscaping, and further indicating any trees to be removed as part of the construction process) for review and approval, if required, by the Development Planning Department; 2. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.(PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TIME PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED IN ANY WAY, FAILURE TO MEET THIS DEADLINE WILL RESULT IN REQUIRING A NEW APPLICATION AND FEE.) Previously adjourned from the July 26, 2012, September 6, 2012, October 11, 2012 & October 25, 2012 meetings Item # 12 FILE NUMBER: A257/12 ANTONIO FIGLIOMENI Part of Lot 23, Concession 5 (Lot 15, Registered Plan 65M-4105, municipally known as 78 Boticelli Way, Woodbridge). The subject lands are zoned RS1, Residential Zone and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(1224) under By-law 1-88 as amended. Page 9 of 14

10 Item # 12 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A257/12 ANTONIO FIGLIOMENI To permit the maintenance of garage door steps, deck, a/c unit and shed related to a single family dwelling, as follows: 1. To permit a garage size width of 2.70 metres. 2. To permit a southerly interior side yard setback of 0.3 metres to the air conditioning unit. 1. A minimum garage width of 3.0 metres is permitted. 2. A minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres is permitted to the air conditioning unit. Antonio Figliomeni and Terri Bimm, the applicants gave a brief submission regarding the request. Mrs. Snejva Areva, 76 Boticelli Way, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 0J5 appeared in opposition of the application. No one else appeared before the Committee in support of or in opposition to the request. A request for decision was received from Mrs. Snejva Areva, 76 Boticelli Way, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 0J5. During the discussions between the Committee, Mr. Figliomeni, Mrs. Brimm and Mrs. Areva, there was concerns raised with respect to the noise admitting from the air conditioner unit as well as parking issues. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the Seconded by A. Perrella THAT Application No. A257/12, ANTONIO FIGLIOMENI, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Previously adjourned from the September 6, 2012 and September 20, 2012 meetings Item # 13 FILE NUMBER: A264/12 MARIA DIBIASE Part of Lot 8, Concession 8, (Part of Lot 66, municipally known as 69 Harmonia Crescent, Woodbridge) The subject lands are zoned R4, Residential under By-Law 1-88 as amended and further subject to exception 9(328). To permit the construction of an open patio roofed canopy related to a single family dwelling, as follows: 1) 3.75m minimum rear yard setback to a covered patio. 2) 15.75m2 maximum shed area. 3) 3.35m maximum shed height. 4) 0.91m minimum rear yard setback to shed. 5) 0.91m minimum side yard setback to shed. 1) 7.5m minimum rear yard setback to a covered patio. 2) 8m2 maximum shed area. 3) 2.5m maximum shed height. 4) 7.5m minimum rear yard setback to shed. 5) 1.2m minimum side yard setback to shed. Maria DiBiase, the applicant and Anthony DiBiase, the agent gave a brief submission regarding the request. Mrs. Palma Pallante, 104 Dustan Crescent, Woodbridge, ON, L4L 3W6 appeared on behalf of residents to the adjacent properties in opposition of the application, and reiterated some of their concerns, as outlined in their letter of objection. Mr. Reginald Walker, 67 Harmonia Crescent, Woodbridge, ON, L4L 3Y2 appeared in opposition of the application. Page 10 of 14

11 Item # 13 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A264/12 MARIA DIBIASE Mr. Nick Pinto, 57 Mapes Avenue, Woodbridge, ON, L4L 8R4 appeared in support of the application. No one else appeared before the Committee in support of or in opposition to the request. Request for decisions was received from the following, Mrs. Palma Pallante, 104 Dustan Crescent, Woodbridge, ON, L4L 3W6, Mr. Reginald Walker, 67 Harmonia Crescent, Woodbridge, ON, L4L 3Y2 and Mr. Nick Pinto, 57 Mapes Avenue, Woodbridge, ON, L4L 8R4. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the MOVED by H. Zheng Seconded by L. Fluxgold A. Perrella was opposed to the application. THAT Application No. A264/12,, MARIA DIBIASE be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Previously adjourned from September 20, 2012 meeting Item # 14 FILE NUMBER: A274/12 BRIAN TAUB AND DEBRA FELDMAN Part of Lot 11, Concession 2, (Lot 86, Registered Plan 65M-3521, municipally known as 38 Bentwood Crescent, Thornhill). The subject lands are zoned RVM1 (WS-B)*, Residential Urban Village Multiple Dwelling Zone One under By-law 1-88 subject to Exception 9(1063) as amended. PRIOR to the applicants submission it was agreed to amend the Application, Sketch, and Notice of Application by amending the following: 1. Minimum Rear Yard Setback to open and unenclosed deck = 2.1m NOT 0m To permit the maintenance of an existing open and unenclosed deck at the rear of an existing two-storey single family detached dwelling. 1. Minimum Rear Yard Setback to open and unenclosed deck = 2.1m 2. Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback to open and unenclosed deck = 0m 1. Minimum Rear Yard Setback to open and unenclosed deck = 4.2m 2. Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback to open and unenclosed deck = 1.2m Debra Feldman, the applicant gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the Seconded by L. Fluxgold THAT Application No. A274/12, BRIAN TAUB AND DEBRA FELDMAN, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch subject to the following conditions: 1. That a building permit be issued for the accessory structure, if required to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 2. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.(PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TIME PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED IN ANY WAY, FAILURE TO MEET THIS DEADLINE WILL RESULT IN REQUIRING A NEW APPLICATION AND FEE.) Page 11 of 14

12 Previously adjourned from the September 20, 2012 meeting Item # 15 FILE NUMBER: A286/ ONTARIO LTD. Part of Lot 4, Concession 6 (Lot 19, Registered Plan 65M-2643, municipally known as 115 Sharer Road, Woodbridge) The subject lands are zoned EM2, General Employment Area Zone, subject to the provisions under By-Law 1-88 as amended. To permit the continued construction of tenant interiors, as follows: 1) To permit a minimum of 28 parking spaces for the site 1) A minimum of 42 parking spaces are required for the site. (Tenant 1 requires 3.5 spaces per 100m2 for the unit which exceeds the maximum 49% accessory office and is thus an office 3.5 spaces per 100m2 not an employment use). Nino Rico, Nino Rico Architect, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the THAT Application No. A286/12, ONTARIO LTD., be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant satisfy the Development/Transportation Engineering Department, if required. 2. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.(PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TIME PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED IN ANY WAY, FAILURE TO MEET THIS DEADLINE WILL RESULT IN REQUIRING A NEW APPLICATION AND FEE.) Previously adjourned from the October 11, 2012 meeting Item # 16 FILE NUMBER: A303/12 ALENA KHARLIP Part of Lot 11, Concession 2 (Lot 370, Registered Plan 65M-37575, municipally known as 203 Seabreeze Avenue, Thornhill) The subject lands are zoned RV3 (WS), Residential, subject to Exception 9(1063), under By-law 1-88, as amended. To permit the construction of a deck related to a single family dwelling, as follows: 1. To permit a minimum rear yard setback of m to a covered, open and unenclosed deck. 1. A minimum rear yard setback of 3.6 m is required to a covered, open and unenclosed deck. Sergej Terentjev, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the Page 12 of 14

13 Item # 16 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A303/12 ALENA KHARLIP Seconded by L. Fluxgold THAT Application No. A303/12, ALENA KHARLIP, be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Previously adjourned from the October 25, 2012 meeting Item # 17 FILE NUMBER: A333/ ONTARIO INC. Part of Lot 30, Concession 3 (Lots 389 & 390, Registered Plan 65M-3556, municipally known as Keele Street, Maple). The subject lands are zoned C3, Local Commercial Zone and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(946) under By-law 1-88 as amended. To permit the maintenance of an eating establishment as follows: 1. To permit Eating Establishments to occupy a maximum of 26% of the total combined Gross Floor Area of the building. 2. To permit a total of 111 parking spaces. 1. A maximum of 20% of the total combined Gross Floor Area of the building can be occupied by Eating Establishments. 2. A minimum of 136 parking spaces are required. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Zoning By-law Amendment & Site Plan application - Z & DA Jane Mcfarlane, Weston Consulting Group, the agent appeared on behalf of the applicant. The Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the THAT Application No. A333/12, ONTARIO INC., be APPROVED, in accordance with the attached sketch Item # 10 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A336/12 ELVIO & ROSA RASILE The Committee called for the applicant and/or agent, but no one appeared for the application. THAT Application No. A286/12, ONTARIO LTD., be ADJOURNED SINE DIE. Page 13 of 14

14 Item # 19 Cont d FILE NUMBER: A224/12 MARCO DELUCA LTD. At this point Marco DeLuca s engineer was still not present. The Committee suggested to adjourn the application to allow staff time to review the recently submitted parking study THAT Application No. A224/12, MARCO DELUCA LTD, be ADJOURNED TO NOVEMBER 22, OTHER BUSINESS None. MOTION TO ADJOURN THAT the meeting of Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:06p.m., and the next regular meeting will be held on November 22, Page 14 of 14