Does Primary Parity Lead to the Presidency?
|
|
- Nickolas Allen
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Does Primary Parity Lead to the Presidency? By Kevin Carter Professor James Lengle 12/4/2009
2 An Unprecedented Primary On June 2, 2008, then-senator Barack Obama pushed past the minimum 2,118 delegates needed for the Democratic Party s presidential nomination and claimed victory before a crowd of supporters in St. Paul, MN. Meanwhile, in New York, presidential contender Hillary Clinton was giving a speech of her own. In it, she recognized Obama s accomplishment but neither conceded nor dropped out of the race. The New York Times called her speech more defiant than conciliatory as she reiterated her belief that she was not only the stronger candidate but also the popular choice of voters (Zeleny 2008). Her speech should not have come as a surprise to anyone following what had become a bitter and tight primary race. Earlier that day, two states held primaries; Clinton won South Dakota and Obama won Montana. The outcomes were representative of the entire primary race, which lasted five months and consisted of an unprecedented 57 contests held across every state and US territory. The Democratic Primary seemed especially protracted when compared to the Republican s. John McCain had passed the threshold of 1,191 delegates needed to clinch his party s nomination on March 3, 2008 (three months before Obama claimed victory for the Democrats) (Jackson 2008). However, unlike Obama s nomination, McCain s was an almost foregone conclusion after winning New Hampshire and South Carolina then parlaying those victories into a successful showing on Super Tuesday. Further, unlike Clinton, McCain s primary opponent, Mike Huckabee (former Governor of Arkansas) bowed out of the race and encouraged his supporters to unite behind McCain
3 (Bush 2008). Huckabee would not win more than 12 percent of the vote in any primary after his withdrawal. Political pundits declared March 3 rd a double victory for McCain: He had won both his party s nomination and a head start on whomever would be his general election challenger. "Tomorrow, he can get started," Republican strategist Alex Castellanos told CNN. "He'll have the [Republican National Committee] behind him. He'll have a broad base of financial support. It's a big step. Meanwhile, it looks like the Democrats are engaged in the land war across Russia, so he's got a big advantage now." (Bush 2008) The Big Advantage Castellanos words echo a sentiment shared by many politicians, pundits, and academics. Prior to the 2000 Democratic Primary, the Democratic National Convention s (DNC) Rules and Bylaws Committee chose not to reform the primary system because it produced clear winners early in the process. The Committee s report to DNC chair Ed Rendell stated, Criticism about a front-loaded schedule has to be weighed against a process that seems to be working well. In the last few cycles, the current system has allowed the Democratic Party to identify its presumptive nominee early. As a result, the process has helped the Party unify behind its nominee and focus its resources on the general election Therefore, at this point, there is little incentive to change the system. (2000) Indeed, Al Gore started out as the heir apparent and easily captured the 2000 nomination. (Gangale 2007) Gore s challengers failed to win a single primary while George W. Bush and McCain fought it out for the Republican nomination. Although the
4 2000 Republican Primary was effectively over by March, McCain still defeated Bush in seven of the eighteen primaries he entered (Stanley and Richard 2007). The general election would prove more competitive than either candidate s primary with Gore winning 48.4 percent of the popular vote to Bush s (However, Bush would win the majority of Electoral College votes and therefore, the presidency.) Building off of Castellanos comments, the Committee s report, and Gore s popular vote victory, one starts to see the genesis of a theory: The candidate with a less competitive primary is more competitive in the general election. The Primary System Since 1912, the parties have held presidential primaries to award delegates. Primaries originally started in twelve states and represented only a third of total delegates. As primaries grew in importance and size of delegate selection, it became increasingly difficult to win the party s nomination without winning a plurality of the primary vote would be the last year a candidate would have less than a plurality of primary votes yet still win the nomination (Scammon and McGillivray 1988). Even today, unpledged, super delegates (party leaders and elected officials that retain autonomy in their voting on nominees) have been recast as representatives of popular will. Barack Obama s campaign manager, David Plouffe admits to feeding the notion that super delegates should vote the same as their districts voted (Kamarck 2009). Primaries are also more likely to represent the popular will of voters. Since the Reform Movement that established the McGovern-Fraser reforms, primaries have become increasingly binding in their selection of delegates (Kamarck 2009).
5 Table 1. Number of Binding versus Beauty Contest Primaries: Pre-Reform and Post- Reform Era. Year Presidential Preference Presidential preference poll poll is binding is advisory only (beauty contest) Reform Movement Reform Movement Reform Movement a a. In 2008, the Michigan and Florida primaries on the Democratic side were initially beauty contests only; eventually those delegates were seated with half votes. Source: Kamarck, Elaine C Today, we can safely say that primaries are the most important formal part to the nominating process. Even in the early years of the post-reform era, political scientist James Lengle observed, Presidential primaries have become, without a doubt, the only Road to the White House. (1981) We know that winning the primary is all-important, but the question that follows is: Does it matter how you win it? Essentially, are Castellanos and the DNC Committee correct in their assertion that a non-competitive or uncontested primary increases general election viability? Alternatively, do the rigors of a protracted and intense primary race create a stronger nominee?
6 Revisionist History Four days after being mathematically eliminated from earning the Democratic nomination, Clinton again stood before her supporters. This would be her last speech as a candidate. In it she encouraged her followers to do all we can to help elect Barack Obama. (2008) While she preached party unity, her surrogates did their best to spin the heated rhetoric of the primary as a chance to battle-test Obama. Mr. Obama is a stronger candidate today thanks to Mrs. Clinton's pursuit of the Democratic nomination. Lanny Davis, former special counsel to President Bill Clinton, wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece. And, far from being polarizing, she has helped bring the party together more than at any time in recent memory. (2008) Null Hypothesis The purpose of this paper is to examine the claim - made by both Clinton s and Obama s campaigns - that a close election creates a stronger candidate. Davis listed the following as potential reasons why a close primary would benefit the eventual nominee: 1) Grassroots support and official campaign organization is set up in nearly every state. 2) Increased media exposure. 3) Increased networks for fundraising. 4) Prepared nominee for general election debates. 5) Exposed potential flaws and weaknesses and allowed campaign to develop effective responses.
7 Alternative Hypothesis The alternative hypothesis is that the candidate with a less competitive primary is more competitive in the general election. The reasons for the alternative hypothesis are: 1) Concentrated financial support. 2) Support of the party s networks and organizations. 3) Focus issues and attacks on the opposition. 4) Competitive primaries demonstrate an inability to secure the base. 5) Avoids infighting and divisions that may last through general election. Support The literature on competitive primaries answers only part of my question. For example, a table of primary vote percentage and general election results among incumbent presidents showed a clear trend towards the alternative hypothesis that the less competitive the primary the more likely the candidate is to win.
8 Table 2. Incumbent s Percentage of: Primary Vote General Election Results Clear Sailing Woodrow Wilson (1916) 99% Won Calvin Coolidge (1924) 68% Won Franklin D. Roosevelt (1936) 93% Won Franklin D. Roosevelt (1940) 72% Won Franklin D. Roosevelt (1944) 71% Won Harry S. Truman (1948) 64% Won Dwight D. Eisenhower (1956) 86% Won Lyndon B. Johnson (1964)* 88% Won Richard Nixon (1972) 87% Won Ronald Reagan (1984) 99% Won Bill Clinton (1996) 88% Won George W. Bush (2004)*** 99% Won Tough Sledding William H. Taft (1912) 34% Lost Herbert Hoover (1932) 33% Lost Gerald R. Ford (1976) 53% Lost Jimmy Carter (1980) 55% Lost George Bush (1992)** 72% Lost *The Johnson primary vote includes votes for favorite sons and uncommitted delegates. ** It would seem that George Bush (1992) is the one anomaly in the table. He had a primary vote percentage greater than or equal to three of those listed in Clear Sailing but the author chose to list him in Tough Sledding. I do not know the author s reasoning; therefore, I have left him as originally placed in the table. *** I added George W. Bush to the Clear Sailing so the information would be up-to-date. Source: Levin, Jerome D. 2002, pp.105 Although Table 2 is not clear on where it draws the line between Clear Sailing and Tough Sledding, it does appear that, all things being equal, it is preferable to enter the general election with the support of your party at least for incumbents. Primary competitiveness is further examined in Table 3 in Thomas Gangale s work on the competitiveness of nomination campaigns in terms of number of candidates.
9 Table 3: Competitiveness of Presidential Nomination Campaigns, Number of Candidates Democratic Party Republican Party Year Start End Start End General Election Winner uncontested Republican Democrat Republican uncontested Republican Republican Democrat 1996 uncontested 10 6 Democrat Republican uncontested Republican A. End = Candidates remaining in the race at the time of the national convention. Source: Source: Parshall and Mattei 2002, Parties and the Presidential Nomination Process, 41 It is clear that in the four uncontested contests, the unchallenged nominee went on to win the general election. However, Gangale points out that in four of the five elections without an uncontested nominee, the party with more candidates won. Gangale argues, Thus the historical data suggests the next best thing to an uncontested nomination, which can only occur in the case of a popular incumbent is a highly contested nomination. (2007) He suggests parties should promote highly contested elections as they generate more media attention, more interest in the party s candidates, more diversity of issues, and hopefully in the end, a more fully vetted political platform. (2007) However, his logic is extremely flawed. First, he does not consider that Gore was the general election s popular vote winner in 20o0. If he had listed the Democratic Party as the 2000 winner, his theory in favor of more competitive primaries would have held up only three out of five elections. Second, the remaining three uncontested races (in
10 which the general election winner had a more competitive primary) all involved incumbents. For example, in 1992, the Republican Party started and ended with two candidates for the nomination, and the Democratic Party started with eight and ended with five. The Democratic Party won the general election. Gangale s theory suggests that the Republicans would have fared better had they run more candidates in the primary. Gangale ignores the fact that the Republican nominee was a sitting president and 1980 also saw sitting presidents who were challenged in the primary and lost the general. I doubt there are many people (besides Gangale) who believe that these incumbents would have benefited from more challengers. Although we can throw out Gangale s theory, we should not be as quick to throw out his data. Pulling from Table 3, we find that any year an incumbent is challenged in a primary, he loses. Any year the incumbent s primary is uncontested, he wins. Additionally, any year that there is no incumbent from either party (1988 and 2000) the less competitive party wins the general election. 1 When we account for incumbents and Gore winning the 2000 general election s popular vote, we find the opposite of Gangale s theory. We find that the less competitive primary race produces the more competitive nominee. Both tables provide us a good base from which to examine our hypothesis, but Table 2 tells us nothing about open races or comparative competitiveness (i.e. the primary percentage of one party compared to the other s) and Table 3 tells us nothing about the degree of competitiveness (i.e. it tells us how many candidates were in a primary race but not the percentage of the vote received). A study on the effects of 1 This assumes Gore as the 2000 election winner.
11 competitiveness will need to compare one nominee s primary percentage to the other s and account for incumbency advantage in primaries. Data and Methodology: My dataset consists of the 25 presidential elections since the parties introduced primaries ( ). Table 4 lists the percentage of primary vote out of all primary voters. So, in 2008, McCain won 9.9 million out of million votes in the Republican primary (or 47.3%) and Obama million votes (or 48.2%) (Real Clear Politics, 2008). Originally, I was concerned that this would give me an inaccurate measure of competitiveness. The percentage of popular vote tells us nothing about the length of a primary race. McCain might have 47.3% of the popular vote, but is it accurate to call his race more competitive than Obama s? Yes, I believe that the percentage of primary vote is an accurate measure of competitiveness. The Republican and Democratic parties hold an almost identical number of primaries each election cycle. Further, although McCain essentially clinched the nomination in March, his early results, which included several losses of less than 20%, are reflected in his overall primary percentage. However, the popular vote percentage still may be skewed by several large states positioned early in the primary. These states would influence the primary percentage because a) they have large populations and b) their position at the beginning of the race would increase turnout. For example, Florida held its Republican primary in January and voted only 36% for McCain. That percentage could arguably skew the results since Florida represented 10 percent of total Republican primary voters. Essentially, McCain s
12 final primary percentage will look more like the elections at the beginning of the race (i.e. Florida) than the inconsequential ones at the end of the race (such as Oregon, which voted 81% for McCain but only represented 1.5% of Republican primary voters). This would not be true of Obama s primary percentage because his race was competitive until the last primaries. One way to test the skew is to average the nominee s vote percentage in each state. This would weigh each state equally regardless of size, turnout, or position in the primary. In making all states equal, this number is extremely flawed, but it provides a rough idea of a primary percentage skew. McCain s primary state average is 49.3% compared to a primary popular vote of 47.3%. Obama s primary state average is 53% to his primary popular vote of 48.2%. I predicted this average would be slightly higher than the popular vote percentage because there are fewer candidates to split the vote in the later states, which are now weighted equally with the early states. The result from averaging each primary is useless except in supporting the primary percentage as a measure of competitiveness. I am now comfortable saying McCain faced a more competitive primary than Obama despite conventional wisdom suggesting otherwise. Returning to Table 4, we find that in 21 out of 25 elections, the candidate that had a higher primary percentage and therefore, a less competitive primary race, won the general election.
13 Table 4: Comparative Primary Competitiveness and General Election Outcomes Primary % General % Primary Spread Republican Outcome 2008 McCain Loss Obama Bush Win Kerry Bush Loss* Gore Dole Loss Clinton Bush Loss Clinton Bush Win Dukakis Reagan Win Mondale Reagan Win Carter Ford Loss Carter Nixon Win McGovern Nixon Win Humphrey Goldwater** Loss Johnson Nixon Loss Kennedy Eisenhower Win Stevenson Eisenhower Win
14 Stevenson Dewey Loss Truman Dewey Loss Roosevelt Willkie Loss Roosevelt Landon Loss Roosevelt Hoover Loss Roosevelt Hoover Win Smith Coolidge Win Davis Harding Win Cox Hughes Loss Wilson Taft Loss Wilson * I list Gore as the winner of the popular vote in **Johnson s 1964 primary percentage includes votes for favorite sons and uncommitted delegates. At first glance, these results are encouraging. When the primary spread (the Republican primary percentage minus the Democrat s) is a positive number, it signifies the Republican candidate had the less competitive primary election. A negative spread signifies the Republican candidate had the more competitive primary election. Further, I find that the primary score corresponds to election outcomes 84% of the time. The two instances since 1972 (the year primary reforms took effect) that the primary spread did not predict the election outcome involved incumbents. To account
15 for a sitting president, I need to assign some point value for incumbency. For purposes of this test, I am assigning incumbency as worth 22 points in a primary election. The number is somewhat arbitrary but it is the value I can subtract from George Bush s (1992) primary percentage to get a negative spread (indicating a Republican loss) while still maintaining a negative spread (and Johnson victory) in The value 22 comes from those two spreads (-22.8 and 21.9) and appears to be an accurate reflection of how much incumbency is worth in a primary. Accounting for an incumbency advantage is also necessary to perform a regression with primary election and general election percentages. Table 5 shows elections with sitting presidents when we account for incumbency: Table 5: Re-Election Results with Incumbency Valued at 22 Primary Percentage Points Primary % General % -22 Primary Scores Primary Spread Outcome 2004 Bush Win Kerry Dole Loss Clinton Bush Loss Clinton Reagan Win Mondale Reagan Win Carter Ford Loss Carter Nixon Win McGovern Goldwater Loss
16 Johnson Eisenhower Win Stevenson Dewey Loss Truman Willkie Loss Roosevelt Landon Loss Roosevelt Hoover Loss Roosevelt Coolidge Win Davis Hughes Loss Wilson Adjusted for incumbency advantage, the primary spread correctly predicts the election 23 out of 25 times (92%) and in all 10 elections since primary reforms took effect. Regression Next, I wanted to see how well primary elections correspond to general election percentages. The data in Tables 4 and 5 suggest that having a less competitive primary is more likely to result in a general election victory, but I am still not certain whether the degree of competitiveness matters. For example, Obama ran in a less competitive primary than McCain and we can assume, using the spread analysis from earlier, that he would win the general election. We cannot; however, assume that had Clinton dropped out of the race and Obama pulled in a higher percentage of primary voters, he would
17 have won the general election by a larger margin. To make that assertion, we need to find a correlation between primary and general election percentages. I enlisted the help of fellow graduate student and friend Colin Shelby to assist me with the data analysis and statistical software STATA. Our first test used the original data for all 25 elections. The results were discouraging: R-squared equaled , suggesting only 22% of the variance in the general election percentages is explained by the percentage of primary vote earned. Our second test used only data from the ten most recent elections. These results were more accurate (R-squared equaled 0.351) - most likely because they all occurred after the reform movement. However, these results still did not account for incumbency advantage. Our third and final test used data from the ten most recent elections while subtracting 22 points from any incumbent s primary percentage (see Table 5). These results did not fare much better. We achieved an R-squared equal to The results suggest that the general election percentage vote a candidate receives only corresponds to a small part of his or her showing in a primary. There are many other factors which may influence the election results during the period after the primaries up until the first Tuesday in November. My model does not capture these developments. However, from this final test, I can build a model for predicting the general election percentage of each candidate. The model is: General Election % = (Primary %) For the past ten elections, with incumbency valued at 22 points, this model is an average of 4 points off predicting the general election. In some cases, it came very close
18 (it predicted John McCain s score within 0.09% of the actual result) others, not so much (it was 6.87% off of Obama s). Conclusion I cannot say that Clinton endangered Obama s presidential hopes by extending the primary nor can I say that McCain would have won if he polled just a percentage point higher among Republicans. What I can say is that the trend over the past nearly hundred years points decidedly against claims that a more competitive primary creates a more competitive candidate. The fact is: In 21 of the 25 elections, the candidate with the less competitive primary race as measured by percentage of popular vote won the general election. When accounting an expected 22 point advantage for incumbents, the trend holds in 23 out of 25 elections and more important, in the ten most recent elections since the parties instituted primary reforms. Unfortunately, using primary percentages to predict the general election percentages does not hold up nearly as well. This correlation should not be mistaken for causation. We have no way of knowing if Edward Kennedy s run in 1980 weakened Carter s chances or whether it was the chinks in the presidents armor that encouraged an intraparty opponent in the first place. I tend to think it is a little of both. A candidate s inability to secure his or her base (represented by the primary voters which later become general election voters) is both a reflection of a candidate s weakness and a reason for independent and swing voters to question the candidate s electability. Future presidential hopefuls would be wise to win big and win early during the primaries, and if they can t, get out of the way.
19 References: "2008 Republican Popular Vote." Real Clear Politics. Web. 28 Nov < nt.html>. Bush, Dana. "McCain wins GOP nomination; Huckabee bows out." CNN.com. Cable News Network, 5 Mar Web. 20 Nov < Davis, Lanny J. "Hillary Made Obama a Better Candidate." WSJ.com. Wall Street Journal, 17 Oct Web. 28 Nov < Democratic National Committee. Beyond 2000: The Scheduling of Future Democratic Presidential Primaries and Caucuses, 11, 16. Washington, DC: Democratic National Committee, Gangale, Thomas. From the Primaries to the Polls How to Repair America's Broken Presidential Nomination Process. New York: Praeger, 2007, pp. 52, 54 "Hillary Clinton Endorses Barack Obama." NewYorkTimes.com. New York Times, 7 June Web. 28 Nov < Jackson, David. "McCain clinches nomination, turns attention to November." USAToday.com. USA Today, 5 Mar Web. 20 Nov < Kamarck, Elaine C. Primary Politics: How Presidential Candidates Have Shaped the Modern Nominating System. Washington: Brookings Institution, 2009, pp Lengle, James. Representation and Presidential Primaries: The Democratic Party in the Post-Reform Era. Greenwood, 1981, pp. 6 Levin, Jerome D. Presidential Elections (Presidential Elections Since 1789). New York: CQ, Print. Scammon, Richard M., and Alice V. McGillivray, comps. America at the Polls 2. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc., Print. Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi. Vital Statistics on American Politics (Vital Statistics on American Politics). New York: CQ, Print. Zeleny, Jeff. "Obama Clinches Nomination; First Black Candidate to Lead a Major Party Ticket." NewYorkTimes.com. New York Times, 4 June Web. 20 Nov
American Presidential Elections. The American presidential election system has produced some interesting quirks, such as...
American Presidential Elections The American presidential election system has produced some interesting quirks, such as..., when s Jefferson and Burr receive the same number of electoral votes, thus forcing
More informationElectoral College Reform: Evaluation and Policy Recommendations
Electoral College Reform: Evaluation and Policy Recommendations Albert Qian, Alex Hider, Amanda Khan, Caroline Reisch, Madeline Goossen, and Araksya Nordikyan Research Question What are alternative ways
More informationThe 2014 Legislative Elections
The 2014 Legislative Elections By Tim Storey The 2014 election resulted in Republican dominance of state legislative control unmatched in nearly a century. Riding a surge of disaffection with a president
More informationTHE 2008 ELECTION: 1 DAY TO GO October 31 November 2, 2008
CBS NEWS POLL For Release: Monday, November 3 rd, 2008 3:00 PM (EST) THE 2008 ELECTION: 1 DAY TO GO October 31 November 2, 2008 On the eve of the 2008 presidential election, the CBS News Poll finds the
More informationAmericans fear the financial crisis has far-reaching effects for the whole nation and are more pessimistic about the economy than ever.
CBS NEWS POLL For Release: Wednesday, October 1st, 2008 3:00 pm (EDT) THE BAILOUT, THE ECONOMY AND THE CAMPAIGN September 27-30, 2008 Americans fear the financial crisis has far-reaching effects for the
More informationSS7 CIVICS, CH. 8.1 THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN PARTIES FALL 2016 PP. PROJECT
PROJECT SS7 CIVICS, CH. 8.1 THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN PARTIES DATE FALL 2016 CLIENT PP. 1. WHAT IS A POLITICAL PARTY? A POLITICAL PARTY IS AN ASSOCIATION OF VOTERS WITH COMMON INTERESTS WHO WANT TO INFLUENCE
More informationAmerican political campaigns
American political campaigns William L. Benoit OHIO UNIVERSITY, USA ABSTRACT: This essay provides a perspective on political campaigns in the United States. First, the historical background is discussed.
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL34222 Presidential Nominating Process: Current Issues Kevin J. Coleman, Government and Finance Division June 26, 2008
More informationTIME FOR A CHANGE? FORECASTING THE 2008 ELECTION Forecasts of the Primary Model
TIME FOR A CHANGE? FORECASTING THE 2008 ELECTION 2008 Forecasts of the Primary Model (Democratic Percentage of 2-Party Vote) (August 1, 2007) Democratic Candidate Republican Candidate Clinton Obama Edwards
More informationSelecting a President: The Presidential Nomination and Election Process
Selecting a President: The Presidential Nomination and Election Process Presidential Selection Stage 1: Caucuses & Primaries The Battle for the Party Faithful Stage 2: Nominating Conventions Glorified
More informationWednesday, March 7 th
Parties and Politics 1 Wednesday, March 7 th Final version of Essay 1 version due in lab tomorrow or Friday Film #2: Glory on Wednesday, March 14 th and Thursday, March 15 th in 140 JSB at 5:00 and 7:30
More informationContemporary Developments in Presidential Elections
Contemporary Developments in Presidential Elections Kevin J. Coleman Analyst in Elections R. Sam Garrett Specialist in American National Government Thomas H. Neale Specialist American National Government
More informationAnalyzing presidential elections without incumbents. Alexander Slutsker. University of Maryland. I. Introduction
Analyzing presidential elections without incumbents Alexander Slutsker University of Maryland I. Introduction As pundits and scholars analyze the upcoming 2008 presidential election, it is useful to examine
More informationFEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT President & Domestic Policy October 11, Dr. Michael Sullivan. MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30
President & Domestic Policy October 11, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30 TODAY S AGENDA Current Events Presidency & Domestic Policy Upcoming Assignments
More informationHow did third parties affect US Presidential Campaigns since 1900? By Tom Hyndman 9E
How did third parties affect US Presidential Campaigns since 1900? By Tom Hyndman 9E Independent Candidates in the United States since 1900 Introduction In the United States since 1900 a few candidates
More informationNEWS RELEASE. Poll Shows Tight Races Obama Leads Clinton. Democratic Primary Election Vote Intention for Obama & Clinton
NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 18, 2008 Contact: Michael Wolf, Assistant Professor of Political Science, 260-481-6898 Andrew Downs, Assistant Professor of Political Science, 260-481-6691 Poll
More informationELECTING THE PRESIDENT:
ELECTING THE PRESIDENT: Six Steps to the Summit Teacher s Guide TEACHER S GUIDE Educational Video Group presents ELECTING THE PRESIDENT Six Steps To The Summit. This fifty-six minute program has been constructed
More informationThe Keys to the White House: Updated Forecast for 2008
The Keys to the White House: Updated Forecast for 2008 Allan J. Lichtman Professor of History American University Washington, DC 20016 202-885-2411 lichtman@american.edu Abstract The Keys to the White
More information2008 AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS: AN OVERVIEW
Neslihan Kaptanoğlu TEPAV Foreign Policy Studies Program On November 4, 2008, the United States of America will hold its 55 th election for President and Vice President. Additionally, all 435 members of
More informationContemporary Developments in Presidential Elections
Contemporary Developments in Presidential Elections Kevin J Coleman Analyst in Elections R Sam Garrett Specialist in American National Government Thomas H Neale Specialist American National Government
More information2008 Democratic Nomination
28 Democratic Nomination God s gift to government teachers The Big Picture - Step 1 Each state holds a primary or caucus between January & June States who hold their contests early get more media and candidate
More informationWhy The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice
Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice A quick look at the National Popular Vote (NPV) approach gives the impression that it promises a much better result in the Electoral College process.
More informationDEMOCRATS DIGEST. A Monthly Newsletter of the Conference of Young Nigerian Democrats. Inside this Issue:
DEMOCRATS DIGEST A Monthly Newsletter of the Conference of Young Nigerian Democrats Inside this Issue: Primary Election I INTRODUCTION Primary Election, preliminary election in which voters select a political
More informationRural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008
June 8, 07 Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 08 To: From: Interested Parties Anna Greenberg, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner William Greener, Greener and
More informationChapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4 Objectives 1. Describe the role of conventions in the presidential nominating process. 2. Evaluate the importance of presidential primaries. 3. Understand the caucus-convention
More informationELECTING CANDIDATES WITH FAIR REPRESENTATION VOTING: RANKED CHOICE VOTING AND OTHER METHODS
November 2013 ELECTING CANDIDATES WITH FAIR REPRESENTATION VOTING: RANKED CHOICE VOTING AND OTHER METHODS A voting system translates peoples' votes into seats. Because the same votes in different systems
More informationTo understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on
To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on Tuesday, November 8th, they are not voting together in
More informationThe Presidential Nominating Process and the National Party Conventions, 2016: Frequently Asked Questions
The Presidential Nominating Process and the National Party Conventions, 2016: Frequently Asked Questions Kevin J. Coleman Analyst in Elections December 30, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationTHE DEMOCRATS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE January 5-6, 2008
FOR RELEASE: Monday, January 7, 2008 11:00am ET THE DEMOCRATS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE January 5-6, 2008 Only 27 of Democratic primary voters in New Hampshire say the results of the Iowa caucuses were important
More informationLSP In-Class Activity 5 Working with PASW 20 points Due by Saturday, Oct. 17 th 11:59 pm ANSWERS
LSP 121-405 In-Class Activity 5 Working with PASW 20 points Due by Saturday, Oct. 17 th 11:59 pm ANSWERS Statistics Age at Inauguration N Valid 44 Missing 0 Mean 54.64 Median 54.50 Mode 54 Std. Deviation
More informationConventions 2008 Script
Conventions 2008 Script SHOT / TITLE DESCRIPTION 1. 00:00 Animated Open Animated Open 2. 00:05 Stacey Delikat in Front of the White House STACEY ON CAMERA: I M STACEY DELIKAT FOR THE.NEWS. COME JANUARY
More informationTEACHER S GUIDE Educational Video Group, Inc.
TEACHER S GUIDE Educational Video Group, Inc. presents ELECTING THE PRESIDENT Six Steps To The Summit. This fifty-six minute program has been constructed for use as a single presentation within one class
More information9. Some industries like oil and gas companies largely support candidates. A) Democrats B) Republicans C) Libertarians D) Independent candidates
Name: Date: 1. is the constitutional clause that delegates control of elections to the state governments. A) Time, place, and manner clause B) Time and place clause C) Time clause D) Election clause 2.
More informationThe Old Way ( ) 9/2/13. The Road to the White House. Nominations Primaries and Caucuses. Road to the White House Overview
The Road to the White House Nominations Primaries and Caucuses Road to the White House Overview Presidential Elections The Road to the White House (A) The Primary System: Nominating Presidential Candidates
More information115 Talbert Hall :30 4:50pm Tuesdays & Thursdays
PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS PSC 344, Fall 2013 Prof. James E. Campbell University at Buffalo, SUNY 511 Park Hall 115 Talbert Hall 645-8452 3:30 4:50pm Tuesdays & Thursdays e-mail: jcampbel@buffalo.edu Course
More informationElection 2012 in Review
Election 2012 in Review Photo source: AP, Bradenton Herald John John Coleman Coleman University of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin Clark University Harrington Lecture, October 24, 2011 Clark University
More information2. A bitter battle between Theodore Roosevelt and his successor, William H. Taft, led to.
Unit 1 Exam Review 1. Why did Theodore Roosevelt propose the Square Deal? 2. A bitter battle between Theodore Roosevelt and his successor, William H. Taft, led to. 3. President Wilson promised a foreign
More informationIntroduction What are political parties, and how do they function in our two-party system? Encourage good behavior among members
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1 Objectives Define a political party. Describe the major functions of political parties. Identify the reasons why the United States has a two-party system. Understand
More informationThe Historical Experience of Experience: How and When Experience in a President Counts Charles O. Jones
Number 12 March 2008 Recent Issues in Governance Studies The Future of Red, Blue and Purple America (January 2008) The Politics of Economic Insecurity (September 2007) Shaping the 44th Presidency (August
More informationPresidents of the United States Cards
Presidents of the United States Cards Print on card stock and laminate for more durability if desired. Use as trading cards with friends as flashcards or a timeline to learn the Presidents. Created by
More informationA Record Shortfall in Personal Popularity Challenges Romney in the Race Ahead
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: Favorability #23 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 5 p.m. Monday, April 16, 2012 A Record Shortfall in Personal Popularity Challenges Romney in the Race Ahead Mitt Romney has emerged
More informationTUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES: 11
ARIZONA E L E C T I O N D A Y : TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES: 11 TOTAL POPULATION (2014): 6,731,484 LATINO POPULATION (2014): 2,056,456 Since 2000, Arizona has seen one particularly
More informationChoosing the Nominee: How Presidential Primaries Came To Be and Their Future in American Politics
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College 4-18-2013 Choosing the Nominee: How Presidential Primaries Came To Be and Their Future in American Politics Ryan Rainey
More informationCampaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30
Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30 Current Events, Recent Polls, & Review Background influences on campaigns Presidential
More information2008 Presidential Debates Questions And Answers 2012 Vice
2008 Presidential Debates Questions And Answers 2012 Vice discussed the history and value of presidential debates with Newton Minow, who played In 1996, as Deputy Campaign Manager for Senator Bob Dole's
More informationSolutions. Algebra II Journal. Module 3: Standard Deviation. Making Deviation Standard
Solutions Algebra II Journal Module 3: Standard Deviation Making Deviation Standard This journal belongs to: 1 Algebra II Journal: Reflection 1 Respond to the following reflection questions and submit
More informationMacroeconomics and Presidential Elections
Macroeconomics and Presidential Elections WEEKLY MARKET UPDATE JUNE 28, 2011 With the start of July, it s now just 16 months until we have our next presidential election in the United States. Republican
More informationDebates and the Race for the White House Script
Debates and the Race for the White House Script SHOT / TITLE DESCRIPTION 1. 00:00 Animated Open Animated Open 2. 00:07 Barack Obama and John McCain convention footage THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN PARTY
More informationCampaign Finance Charges Raise Doubts Among 7% of Clinton Backers FINAL PEW CENTER SURVEY-CLINTON 52%, DOLE 38%, PEROT 9%
FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1996, 5:00 P.M. Campaign Finance Charges Raise Doubts Among 7% of Clinton Backers FINAL PEW CENTER SURVEY-CLINTON 52%, DOLE 38%, PEROT 9% FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
More informationMarist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu New Hampshire Presidential Primary EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Wednesday 6 p.m.
More informationJulie Lenggenhager. The "Ideal" Female Candidate
Julie Lenggenhager The "Ideal" Female Candidate Why are there so few women elected to positions in both gubernatorial and senatorial contests? Since the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920
More informationCampaign Process: Running for the Presidency Activity
Campaign Process: Running for the Presidency Activity On blank paper, create a flowchart, timeline, or another visual representation that organizes the process of running for the Presidency. You can work
More informationAmy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents
Amy Tenhouse Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents In 1996, the American public reelected 357 members to the United States House of Representatives; of those
More information2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview
2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview ʺIn Clinton, the superdelegates have a candidate who fits their recent mold and the last two elections have been very close. This year is a bad year for Republicans.
More informationAmerican Dental Association
American Dental Association May 2, 2016 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1 Heading into the Election Year SLIDE 2 Direction of country remains strongly negative for over a decade. Right Track Wrong Direction WT 80
More informationThe Presidential Nominating Process and the National Party Conventions, 2012: Frequently Asked Questions
The Presidential Nominating Process and the National Party Conventions, 2012: Frequently Asked Questions Kevin J. Coleman Analyst in Elections June 12, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members
More informationChapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1 What is a Party? The party organization is the party professionals who run the party at all levels by contributing time, money, and skill. The party in government
More informationBattleground 59: A (Potentially) Wasted Opportunity for the Republican Party Republican Analysis by: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber
Battleground 59: A (Potentially) Wasted Opportunity for the Republican Party Republican Analysis by: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber In what seems like so long ago, the 2016 Presidential Election cycle began
More informationA Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy
THE strategist DEMOCRATIC A Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy www.thedemocraticstrategist.org A TDS Strategy Memo: Why Democrats Should Ignore Swing Voters and Focus on Voter Registration
More informationDPI 613 Polling in the Real World: Using Survey Research To Win Elections and Govern
DPI 613 Polling in the Real World: Using Survey Research To Win Elections and Govern Fall 2013 INSTRUCTOR Peter D. Hart Email: Peter_Hart@hks.harvard.edu Phone: 617-495-8993 (o) Cell Phone: 202-255-0257
More informationSubmission of the President s Budget in Transition Years
Submission of the President s Budget in Transition Years Michelle D. Christensen Analyst in Government Organization and Management May 17, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationAbout the Survey. Rating and Ranking the Presidents
Official Results of the 2018 Presidents & Executive Politics Presidential Greatness Survey Brandon Rottinghaus, University of Houston Justin S. Vaughn, Boise State University About the Survey The 2018
More informationFOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19 AT 4 PM
P O L L Interviews with 1,019 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on December, 2006. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus
More informationExpansion and Reform. (Early 1800s-1861) PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. By Daniel Casciato
Expansion and Reform (Early 1800s-1861) PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES By Daniel Casciato PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES Published by Weigl Publishers Inc. 350 5th Avenue, Suite 3304 PMB 6G New York,
More informationLESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2016 ELECTION
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2016 ELECTION IE 561 Continuous Quality Improvement of Process Fall 2016 Cameron MacKenzie Most of this information comes from the website 538 IE 561 CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
More informationOregon Progressive Party Position on Bill at 2017 Session of Oregon Legislature:
March 23, 2017 411 S.W. 2nd Avenue Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 503-548-2797 info@progparty.org Oregon Progressive Party Position on Bill at 2017 Session of Oregon Legislature: HB 2211: Oppose Dear Committee:
More informationCongressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond
Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond Robert S. Erikson Columbia University 2018 Conference by the Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston Triple Play: Election 2018; Census 2020; and
More informationFuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral College Votes
Fuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral College Votes (Problems with the Whole Number Proportional and Congressional District Systems) By Monideepa Talukdar, Rob Richie and Ryan O Donnell
More informationTHE PRO S AND CON S OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM
High School: U.S. Government Background Information THE PRO S AND CON S OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM There have, in its 200-year history, been a number of critics and proposed reforms to the Electoral
More informationNATIONALLY, THE RACE BETWEEN CLINTON AND OBAMA TIGHTENS January 30 February 2, 2008
CBS NEWS POLL For Release: Sunday, February 3, 2008 6:00 PM EDT NATIONALLY, THE RACE BETWEEN CLINTON AND OBAMA TIGHTENS January 30 February 2, 2008 It s now neck and neck nationally between the two Democratic
More informationPARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS
Number of Representatives October 2012 PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS ANALYZING THE 2010 ELECTIONS TO THE U.S. HOUSE FairVote grounds its analysis of congressional elections in district partisanship.
More informationante tar-1cbger/eagleton POLL
ground memo will appear in Sunday s StarLedger. Other newspapers may also A story based on the survey findings presented in this release and back RELEASE INFORMATION RELEASE: SL/EP192 EP692) BOB CARTER
More informationPresidential Project
Birth/Death February 22, 1732, December 14, 1799 Place of Birth Pope s Creek, Westmoreland County, Virginia Ancestry English Marital Status Martha Dandridge Custis Children None, Adopted two children from
More informationThe Forum. Volume 6, Issue Article 8. The Magnitude of the 2008 Democratic Victory: By the Numbers
The Forum Volume 6, Issue 4 2008 Article 8 ON THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION The Magnitude of the 2008 Democratic Victory: By the Numbers James W. Ceaser, University of Virginia & Stanford University Daniel
More informationDUI Arrest Not a Factor, So Far SLIGHT BUSH MARGIN HOLDING WITH DAYS TO GO
FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2000, 4:00 P.M. DUI Arrest Not a Factor, So Far SLIGHT BUSH MARGIN HOLDING WITH DAYS TO GO FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut, Director Carroll Doherty, Editor
More informationThe 2010 Election and Its Aftermath John Coleman and Charles Franklin Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison
The 2010 Election and Its Aftermath John Coleman and Charles Franklin Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Credit Union League January 25, 2011 Seat Change in States
More informationSELA Antenna in the United States SELA Permanent Secretary No th Quarter 2007
SELA Antenna in the United States SELA Permanent Secretary No. 86 4 th Quarter 2007 SUMMARY: TRADE POLICY AND THE U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Impact of the Election on Issues in 2008 Impact of the Election
More informationPoliticians who needs them? 1 of 5 10/23/2014 8:30 AM. October , 5.34am EDT. Glenn Altschuler
1 of 5 10/23/2014 8:30 AM October 22 2014, 5.34am EDT AU T H O R Glenn Altschuler Education and Summer Sessions at Cornell University Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Professor of American Studies and Dean of
More informationThe Constitution of the United States of America
The Constitution of the United States of America The Federal Government is made up of 3 Branches that have individual powers, duties, and responsibilities. Qualifications to be a: *Representative *Senator
More informationResearch Skills. 2010, 2003 Copyright by Remedia Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
Research Skills U.S. Presidents REM 311 Cover Designer: Meg Turecek A Teaching Resource From 2010, 2003 Copyright by Remedia Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. The purchase of
More informationDELEGATE STRENGTH - AN OVERVIEW BY CNN POLLING DIRECTOR KEATING HOLLAND
- AN OVERVIEW BY CNN POLLING DIRECTOR KEATING HOLLAND It's easy to tell when presidential candidates have won a majority of the delegates up for grabs, but a lot harder to calculate when they have reached
More informationFrom Straw Polls to Scientific Sampling: The Evolution of Opinion Polling
Measuring Public Opinion (HA) In 1936, in the depths of the Great Depression, Literary Digest announced that Alfred Landon would decisively defeat Franklin Roosevelt in the upcoming presidential election.
More information5.1d- Presidential Roles
5.1d- Presidential Roles Express Roles The United States Constitution outlines several of the president's roles and powers, while other roles have developed over time. The presidential roles expressly
More informationPresidential term: Lived: Occupations: Planter, Lawyer. Vice Presidents: Aaron Burr, George Clinton
In this resource you will find portraits of the individuals who served as presidents of the United States, along with their occupations, political party affiliations, and other interesting facts. **The
More informationNEW JERSEY VOTERS TAKE ON 2008
Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-263-5858 (office) 732-979-6769 (cell) pdmurray@monmouth.edu Released: Wednesday, 30, For more information: Monmouth University Polling Institute 400 Cedar Avenue West Long Branch,
More informationAttack Politics Negativity in Presidential Campaigns since 1960 by Emmett H. Buell, Jr. and Lee Sigelman
Attack Politics Negativity in Presidential Campaigns since 1960 by Emmett H. Buell, Jr. and Lee Sigelman The study of several dimensions of presidential campaigns Degree of negativity Topics of campaign
More informationObama Leaves on a High Note Yet with Tepid Career Ratings
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: Obama s Legacy EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 7 a.m. Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2017 Obama Leaves on a High Note Yet with Tepid Career Ratings Boosted by an improving economy, Barack
More informationFranklin Pierce / WBZ Poll
Franklin Pierce / WBZ Poll By: R. Kelly Myers Senior Fellow Franklin Pierce College President and Chief Analyst RKM Research and Communications 603.433.3982 To download this report in.pdf format: www.fpc.edu/nhdems-0604.pdf
More informationChapter 5: Political Parties Ms. Nguyen American Government Bell Ringer: 1. What is this chapter s EQ? 2. Interpret the quote below: No America
Chapter 5: Political Parties Ms. Nguyen American Government Bell Ringer: 1. What is this chapter s EQ? 2. Interpret the quote below: No America without democracy, no democracy without politics, no politics
More informationPost-War United States
Post-War United States (1945-Early 1970s) PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES By Marty Gitlin PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES Published by Weigl Publishers Inc. 350 5th Avenue, Suite 3304 PMB 6G New York,
More informationPresident Trump And America s 2020 Presidential Election: An Analytical Framework
President Trump And America s 2020 Presidential Election: An Analytical Framework March 6, 2019 Trump 2020 Meets Trump 2016 Trump 2020 Is A Stronger Candidate Than Trump 2016 Looking purely at Trump s
More informationIowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group
Department of Political Science Publications 3-1-2014 Iowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group Timothy M. Hagle University of Iowa 2014 Timothy
More informationMidterm Elections Used to Gauge President s Reelection Chances
90 Midterm Elections Used to Gauge President s Reelection Chances --Desmond Wallace-- Desmond Wallace is currently studying at Coastal Carolina University for a Bachelor s degree in both political science
More informationThe United States Presidential Election Process: Undemocratic?
The United States Presidential Election Process: Undemocratic? The Bill of Rights Institute Chicago, IL October 2, 2008 Artemus Ward Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University aeward@niu.edu
More informationEXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE,
WHS (2009) ISSN: 1535-4738 Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. EXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, 1964-2008 ABSTRACT The purpose of this work is to examine the sources
More informationFriends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner 1994=2010. Report on the Democracy Corps and Resurgent Republic bipartisan post election poll
Date: November 9, 2010 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stan Greenberg and James Carville 1994=2010 Report on the Democracy Corps and Resurgent Republic bipartisan post
More informationThe American Electoral Process By Mike Kubic 2016
Name: Class: The American Electoral Process By Mike Kubic 2016 In this article, Mike Kubic, a former correspondent of Newsweek, explains the history and function of the United States Electoral College.
More informationThe Electoral Process. Learning Objectives Students will be able to: STEP BY STEP. reading pages (double-sided ok) to the students.
Teacher s Guide Time Needed: One Class Period The Electoral Process Learning Objectives Students will be able to: Materials Needed: Student worksheets Copy Instructions: All student pages can be copied
More informationThe California Primary and Redistricting
The California Primary and Redistricting This study analyzes what is the important impact of changes in the primary voting rules after a Congressional and Legislative Redistricting. Under a citizen s committee,
More informationFranklin D. Roosevelt To George W. Bush (Education Of The Presidents) READ ONLINE
Franklin D. Roosevelt To George W. Bush (Education Of The Presidents) READ ONLINE If you are searched for a ebook Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush (Education of the Presidents) in pdf format, then
More information