Agenda of ECSOEM/SC08/TG2 TASK GROUP ON DRILLING & WELL SERVICING EQUIPMENT (Spec 7K, RP 7L)

Transcription

1 Agenda of ECSOEM/SC08/TG2 TASK GROUP ON DRILLING & WELL SERVICING EQUIPMENT (Spec 7K, RP 7L) 2017 Exploration & Production Standards Conference on Oilfield Equipment and Materials Telus Convention Center Calgary, Alberta, Canada Date: Tue. June 27, 2017 Time: 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. Chairman: Faisal Yousef Vice-Chairman: Kurt Vandervort SC08 Agenda Item Numbers: [Year] NXX [Year]= Single digit year of introduction N= 0 = No Specific Task Group, 1 = TG1 (Drlg Structures), 2= TG2 (Drlg & Well Serv. Equip.), 3= TG3 (Hoisting Equip.), 4=TG4 (Wirerope and Roller chain) and 5=TG5(Hammer Unions) XX = Sequential Number 1. Open Meeting Introduction and Safety 2. Attendance list and Roster Circulate attendance list and roster. 3. Review minutes of last 2016 TG2 meeting 4. Old Business Drilling and Well Servicing Equipment (Items Y2XX) a. Item 9202: Spec 7K requirement for BOP Handling Systems Mark Trevithick discussed the requirements for BOP Handling Systems. It was noted that only one manufacturer has added this equipment to the scope of their license. Additionally, few manufacturers are offering this equipment to meet API Spec 7K due to onerous requirements for design verification testing, proof load testing, and factors of safety. Motion by: Mark Trevithick Second by: Samir Ghalayini Motion to: Create a NWI and work group to review the product specifications for BOP Handling equipment. The work group will specifically review factors of safety, design verification load test, and proof load test requirements. Motion Passes Shawn Firenza will be the interim lead of this work group and will recruit appropriately. Subsequent to the June 2009 Conference, the following activities took place: Page 1 of 14

2 An open invitation was sent for a work group meeting was called for March 11 th at the offices of Stress Engineering Services. Other than the chairman, no one attended. A formal work group needs to be established or this items needs to be dropped from the agenda. At the June 2010 Conference, the following activities took place: The question was raised whether there is sufficient interest in the work item to keep it on the agenda. It was agreed that a review and possible revision is necessary due to the onerous demands of the current specification and the lack of use in the API community. A formal work group is created consisting of Shawn Firenza, Mark Trevithick, Dewayne Vogt, and Paul Meade-Clift Shawn will chair this group until somebody else agrees to take the role. A work group meeting will be planned for October. Subsequent to the June 2010 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group meeting was not called in October as planned. The first meeting will occur during the June 2011 conference. At the June 2011 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met on June 27 th with the goal of identifying the scope of work. Originally, we believed that the revisions would be limited to a few areas. After further review, it was determined that the entire section needs to be overhauled. Chris Ponzi volunteered to lead the effort. Additionally, the following people have agreed to participate in the work group: Mikael Pedersen, Anthony Mannering, Dewayne Vogt, Norm Dyer, Robert Urbanowski, Mike Yoakum, Dennis Fetter, Paul Boeckman, Eric Simon. At the task group meeting, Shawn Firenza presented the current status. Shawn and Chris will work to develop the NWI with a detailed scope. Subsequent to the June 2011 Conference, the following activities took place: None At the June 2012 Conference, the following activities took place: The Work Group meeting yesterday to discuss the lack of progress on this item. The chair of the work group, Chris Ponzi, has been contacted, and he has committed to progress this item. Additional work group members have been identified and submitted to the work group chair. The TG chair will stay in touch with the work group to expedite progress. Current Work Group Members are: Mikael Pedersen, Anthony Mannering, Dewayne Vogt, Norm Dyer, Robert Urbanowski, Mike Yoakum, Dennis Fetter, Paul Boeckman, Eric Simon, Richard Savage, Harish Patel, John Busbee, Walter Weaver, Mike Seminatore Page 2 of 14

3 Subsequent to the June 2012 Conference, the following activities took place: A proposed revision was circulated to the work group for review on May 30, The work group will meet in Washington, D.C. on Monday, June 24 th. Reference File Drilling and Well Servicing Equipment CRP, pdf At the June 2013 Conference, the following activities took place: Chris Ponzi presented on the Work Group Meeting discussions. A draft is being circulated for comment and a follow-up meeting will be planned for end of September. The goal is to have a new draft ready for circulation by the end of the year. This is an ongoing agenda item. Subsequent to the June 2013 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group will meet during the June 2014 Conference. Due to work load, Chris Ponzi has stepped down as Chair of this group. The new work group Chairman is Mikael Pedersen, NOV. At the June 2014 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group did not meet during the June conference. A draft has been created by Chirs Ponzi and Mikael Pedersen. Mikael presented this draft during the TG2 meeting. The working document will be issued with the TG2 minutes. Counter to the 2013 TG2 minutes, Chris Ponzi will retain the chairmanship for this work group with support from Mikael Pedersen. The TG2 chair solicits the TG for more work group members. Work Group Volunteers Brad Williams, Anwer Masood, Richard Savage, Steve Morin, Norm Dyer, and Dewayne Vogt, At the June 2015 Conference, the following activities took place: Chris Ponzi chaired a group meeting on Monday. The work group has not received any feedback regarding the draft changes to the BOP Handling Systems sections that was sent out prior to the 2014 conference. As such, a motion at the WG meeting was passed that the draft changes would be sent to the API 7K Licensees (by Katie Burkle) and again to Item 9202 workgroup members (by Chris Ponzi) for input with a deadline of a number of days (suggested 60 days). The workgroup would review the input received and adjust the draft changes as needed prior to sending to ballot. At the TG2 meeting, a motion was made by Robert Urbanowski to pass the draft to the API 7K Licensees. Motion by: Robert Urbanowski Second by: Chris Ponzi Page 3 of 14

4 Motion to: Pass the draft to the API 7K Licensees and 7K mailing list for comments. Motion: Carries After The June 2015 Conference There has been no activity on this work item. Chris will not be attending the conference this year but is going to try and have a teleconference meeting sometime in the summer. At the June 2016 Conference TG2 Meeting No Progress over last year. Mikael Pedersen reviewed the 3 year old draft sent by Chris Ponzi. New Work Group Chairman: Mikael Pedersen. Motion: Work Group to review draft and review API RP 7L for changes. Motion By: Faisal Yousef Second By: Robert Urbanowski Motion Passed. After The June 2016 Conference Mikael Pederson reviewed, edited and sent the draft to the work group on October 19, 2016 for comments. Received some comments that were addressed by January 5, There has been more discussion regarding the proof load testing. The draft is being consolidated for distribution to TG2 members prior to 2017 June Conference. This is an ongoing agenda item b. Item 0202: Coverage of Drawworks versus Drawworks Components Currently the scope of API Spec 7K covers drawworks components only and not complete drawworks assemblies. This limits licensees from applying the API monogram to complete drawworks. Should spec 7K cover drawworks, and if so, what else needs to be specified in section 9? At the June 2010 Conference, the following activities took place: This is a difficult issue. It is agreed that Drawworks may not be monogrammed under the current specification as the spec does not cover enough and leaves gaps in critical areas. Page 4 of 14

5 General Discussion more specification would be required including but not limited to types of DW, primary brakes and secondary brakes load sharing, rating, and heat absorption, drive systems The current specification covers primary load path components. Why would it be treated differently than top drives in API 8C? The answer was if the drive system failed on a top drive, the load would not fall. Norm Dyer clarification 3 rd party societies have made their own certification/rules/guidelines due to the lack of coverage in API Paul Meade comments on lacking good direction even from the 3 rd party documents. Norm/Paul discussion on braking capacity proprietary what is and what is not. Shawn Firenza to review List of licenses holders for DW components Motion by: Mark SibilleSecond by: Bob de Pont Motion to: Create a new work item to address drawworks assemblies. Motion Passed Work group will consist of Shawn Firenza, Paul Meade-Clift, Faisal Yousef and Robert Urbanowski. Shawn will approach license holders to solicit further work group members. The work group will be formed by the end of October. Shawn Firenza will advise TG02 of the membership. This is new work item #0202. Subsequent to the June 2010 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group meeting was not called in October as planned. The first meeting will occur during the June 2011 conference. At the June 2011 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met on June 27 th to develop the scope of work. It was agreed that the standard should be limited to the physical drawworks skid. We will not consider the electrical drives, controls, etc. in this specification. The specification will include requirements for ratings (likely single line pull), primaryloadcarrying components, transmission, motors, drives, and brakes (including capacity, redundancy, and criteria for dynamic braking). The safety factor for wire rope should be considered. During the task group meeting, we discussed it further. Faisal Yousef agreed to lead the work group. The current work group members include Adrian Lis, Norm Dyer, Alf Aker, Mike Yoakum, Randy Pyrch, Mark Miser, Shawn Firenza, Paul Mead-Clift, and Robert Urbanowski Page 5 of 14

6 Robert Urbanowski commented about cylinders as hoisting is being addressed in TG3 and there may be overlaps in groups. Norm commented on API having one type of drawworks in 8C and another type in 7K. Should they be combined into either 7K or 8C? Ken Kondo discussed different as drawworks components always being in 7K while the new specification for cylinders includes more overhead applications. Mark Sibille suggested that Richard Akerman (chair of the TG3 work group) speak to API about this issue and discuss the possibility of moving drawworks to 8C. This will impact users and license holders and other. Richard and Shawn will discuss this with the Roland Goodman. Subsequent to the June 2011 Conference, the following activities took place: A work group meeting was held on May 3 rd, Minutes are attached At the June 2012 Conference, the following activities took place: Faisal Yousef presented the work group progress. The work group met in early May as well as on June 11 th. The minutes will be published along with the TG2 minutes. There is work to be done to clean-up the definition of a drawworks. The work group also identified a basic list of requirements that should be addressed in the scope of drawworks coverage. Once the scope is finalized the requirements will be divided and drafted in smaller groups. Additional work group members have been identified. The current work group includes: Faisal Yousef (Chair), Ahmed Mohammed, Ken Kondo or his representative, Norm Dyer, Jeremy Johnson, Brent Dein, Adrian Lis, Norm Dyer, Alf Aker, Mike Yoakum, Randy Pyrch, Mark Miser, Shawn Firenza, Paul Mead-Clift,Robert Urbanowski, and Richard Verhoef Subsequent to the June 2012 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met on April 26 th and May 1, 2013 and developed the attached working document. The work group will also meet on Monday, June 24, 2013 in Washington, D.C. Reference Documents: TG2 Item 0202 (API 7K) Meeting Minutes May pdf API 7K RevisionsRev 5.pdf At the June 2013 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met again and continued to work out revisions in the working draft. The current work group draft will be posted on the API my committee s Page 6 of 14

7 site along with the TG2 minutes. The next work group meeting will be in October. This is an ongoing agenda item. Subsequent to the June 2013 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group has met on several occasions to work through the draft. The work group will also meet during the June 2014 conference to continue the draft. At the June 2014 Conference, the following activities took place: Faisal Yousef updated the TG on the work group status. The work group has held several meetings in the past year, and also met during the June conference. If possible, and additional work group meeting will be held after the SC8 meeting on Wednesday. There has been much progress made, but many questions remain to be answered. After the June 2014 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group had several meetings during 2015 and made some significant progress. The Work group is planning for a meeting at the June 2015 conference. At the June 2015 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met on Monday and reviewed the entire draft and made some changes based on the feedback and discussion. It was suggested that the draft should be circulated to the 7K licensees for review. It was also suggested the draft be reviewed by well services contractor. The work group may require two to three more meetings before a draft is ready for circulation and ballot. At the TG2 meeting, the draft was discussed and comments were made regarding the inclusion of the current load path carrying components. It was noted that API 7K already has that covered. It was also suggested to review API 7L for possible changes due to this work item. The work group will address the above issues. Robert Urbanowski suggested that once the draft is completed, it should be sent to the task group for comments prior to ballot. After The June 2015 Conference: A work group meeting was held at Canrig and continued working on the draft. Discussed the marking and control language to include as an Annex as INFORMATIVE. The work group is planning on meeting on Monday June 27 at the conference. Page 7 of 14

8 At The June 2016 Conference: The work group met on Monday and reviewed the comments that were received from Katie Burkle on the draft that was circulated to the work group on June 15, The group then reviewed the draft and several changes were suggested to the definitions, load rating, brakes and quality control sections. Extensive discussion took place regarding the maximum fast line load during emergency stop. The current draft calls for the fast line load not to exceed 90% of the minimum breaking force of the new rope. Dennis Fetter objected to the use of 90% but he had no way of quantifying what the value should be. This issue still on the table to be resolved. At the June 2016 Conference TG2 Meeting Faisal Yousef noted that the Work Group met over the period since last Conference and Proposed Wording for review. Review of Proposed Wording. Comments and discussion on various points of proposed wording. Changes to proposed wording recorded separate to Minutes. Motion: To send draft back to the work group to review suggested changes in the TG2 meeting and continue working on it. Motion By: Mark Trevithick Second By: Dennis Fetter Motion Passed. After The June 2016 Conference: The work group met on March 15, Draft 2 was circulated the work group members for review prior to the meeting. Comments from Norm Dyer, Mark Sibille, Dennis Fetter and Alf Henry Aker were received. The work group addressed some of the comments during the meeting. The work group also discussed the need for used wire rope test data. Brent Dein and Tim Watson volunteered to search and provide data. The work group also worked on rewording the emergency brake section and Tim Watson volunteered to propose new wording at the next meeting. Andrew Roskey volunteered to do some calculations on existing drawworks to help determine the fast line tension percentage of minimum wire rope breaking strength during emergency stop. The work group met again on April 11, 2017 and reviewed some of the test data received from Tim Watson and was not conclusive. More data is needed. Andrew presented some calculations and graphs but it was a sample of one drawwork. Page 8 of 14

9 Andrew asked for data from other drawworks and Norm volunteered to provide some drawworks data that he has. This is an ongoing agenda item c. Item 2202 and Item 3201: Hose for use in Underbalanced and Gas Drilling/ Proposed Increase to Rated Pressure of Mud and Cement Hoses At the June 2012 Conference, the following activities took place: Dr. Nagy presented a NWI to create a work group to address hoses used for Gas and underbalanced drilling within API Spec 7K. Motion by: Robert Urbanowski Second by: Dr. Tibor Nagy Motion to: Approve the NWI and create a work group to address this item with the limitation that the hoses used for underbalanced drill be limited to those that are carrying fluid to the well bore and not hoses that may be transporting fluids from the well bore. Motion Passed THIS WILL BE ADDED TO THE ONGOING AGENDA AS ITEM 2202 Work Group members: Dr. Nagy (chair), other work group members to be identified but should include other hose manufacturers as well as contractors and operators familiar with these drilling operations Robert Urbanowski suggested to invite to API hose manufactures and representation from IADC s UBO/MPD (Underbalanced Operations & Managed Pressure Drilling) committee Kurt Vandervort suggests that we contact Ken Malloy at Stress for recommendations. Subsequent to the June 2012 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met on May 9 th. Dr. Nagy is working on a draft to present at the June meeting based on the work groups comments. At the June 2013 Conference, the following activities took place: Dr. Nagy presented the work group proposal. Rev 1 of the draft is ready for review by the task group. Motion by: Robert Urbanowski Second by: Tibor Nagy Motion to: Send the new draft revision 1 to TG2 and the licensees that have hoses in their scope for review with a deadline for comments of 45 days. After 45 days, the work group will revise the draft as needed and send the draft to the TG chair and API for letter ballot. Motion: Passed Page 9 of 14

10 LETTER BALLOT ITEM This is an ongoing agenda item. Subsequent to the June 2013 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met in May, 2013 to discuss the Items 2202 and At the June 2014 Conference, the following activities took place: The work group met during the June conference but with limited attendance. There is a working draft that has been circulated with limited comments. These comments will be combined into a new draft. The work group recommends that the new draft be circulated to the TG and the affected licenses holders for comment. These comments will be considered in a new draft that may be sent for letter ballot. Note that this draft includes, higher pressure ratings, considerations for hoses for underbalanced and gas drilling, and fire testing. Motion by: Robert U. Second by: (Guillermo Spangenberg) Motion to: Accept the work group recommendations to circulate the working draft to TG2 and affected licensees with a 90 day time limit for comment, consider any comments and revise the draft as needed, submit the revised draft to API for letter ballot. Motion: Carries At the June 2015 Conference, the following activities took place: Item 2202 and 3201 were combined. Dr. Nagy held a group meeting on Monday to resolve 31 comments received. It was agreed by the work group to recirculate the revised draft to the API Licensees before balloting. A motion was made by Robert Urbanowski to circulate the revised draft to TG2 and API 7K Licensees for review and comments. Motion by: Robert Urbanowski Second by: Anthony Mannering Motion to: Circulate the revised draft to TG2 and API 7K Licensees for review and comments. Motion: Carries After The June 2015 Conference: Draft 4 of Addendum of API 7K 6 th ed. on High Pressure Mud and Cement hose assemblies was prepared, which included new sizes and pressure ratings, new FSL level and gas test, as well as two levels of fire resistance as supplemental requirements. 106 comments were received, and draft 5 formulized. Page 10 of 14

11 Draft 5 was discussed at WG meeting on 04 May in Houston, and further refinements decided, mainly in the definition of hose design family and fire resistance requirements. New draft is due for the WG meeting on Monday 27 June in Washington. At the June 2016 Conference: Alternative Marking of Products Aaron Duke (API Certification Program) explained marking requirements of API 7K HP hose products. Alternative Marking Agreement: Allows third party to re-apply / apply Monogram and License number of a licensed manufacturer, if process performed under controlled conditions. Presently API 7K HP hoses are not part of the program, although listed among eligible products. After detailed discussion the WG concluded, that conditions of Alternative Marking Agreement for API 7K HP hoses should be elaborated, since there is demand for it. Discussion of Addendum API 7K High Pressure Mud and Cement Hose Assemblies WG draft 6a: Draft 6 included the changes agreed to at the 04 May meeting, and it was distributed for comment well before the meeting. Comments received from Robert Urbanowski were incorporated in draft 6a, while comments of Gary Bernard on fire test were discussed during the meeting. It was decided by majority vote, that the two levels of fire test (5 min and 30 min) will be kept, but the procedure will be changed according to the proposal of Gary Bernard. The WG proposes after the modification is implemented, and sent for final comments to WG members, Addendum of API 7K 6 th ed. on High Pressure Mud and Cement Hose Assemblies should go for ballot. At the June 2016 Conference TG2 Meeting Dr. Nagy explained the proposal made by the work group. Motion: Send the draft back to the work group to make proposed changes and send to letter ballot. Motion By: Mark Trevithick Second by: Robert Urbanowski Motion passed. Page 11 of 14

12 After The June 2016 Conference: After the Washington DC meeting, fire test was included into draft 7, this became draft 7a. The main contributors were Eric van der Putten (DNV-GL) and Gary Bernard (Technip). The draft was distributed among WG members for commenting. Nearly 70 comments were received. Among others it was proposed, that basis definitions of HP hoses should be in line with API 16C flexible choke and kill line definitions, however work on API 16C 3rd. Ed. is still ongoing. In consideration of the comments received, Draft 8 is being prepared and will be distributed among the WG members before the Calgary meeting. This is an ongoing agenda item d. Item 5202: API RP 7L: Revise to align with changes to 7K regarding hoses At the June 2015 Conference, the following activities took place: A new work item was submitted by Dr. Nagy. Dr. Nagy explained this current WG working on item 3201 will work on this as well. After The June 2015 Conference: Draft 1 of the proposed HP hose related changes was prepared. 37 comments were received from WG members, and draft 2 was prepared. Draft 2 was discussed at WG meeting on 04 May in Houston, and further refinements decided. New draft is due for the WG meeting on 27 June (Summer Standards Conf. 2016) At the June 2016 Conference: Draft 3 included the changes agreed to at the 04 May meeting, and it was distributed for comment well before the meeting. Comments were received from Robert Urbanowski. His comments (with one exception) were incorporated to draft 3a. The WG proposes that Hose Related sections of API 7L draft 3a should go for ballot. Page 12 of 14

13 At the June 2016 Conference TG2 Meeting Motion: Send work item to letter ballot Motion By: Mark Sibille Second By: Robert Urbanowski second Motion Passed. After The June 2016 Conference: It was suggested by Dr. Nagy that we hold on the API 7L ballot until the hose addendum ballot is nearly done. LETTER BALLOT ITEM This is an ongoing agenda item e. Item 5203: Makeup and Breakout machines (Iron Roughneck) / Power Tong At the June 2015 Conference, the following activities took place: Adrian Lis proposed a new work item to add Power Tongs back into 7K with more meaningful requirement. He was asked to complete new item form and submit at the SC8 meeting. After The June 2016 Conference: The work group met on May 17, 2017 to form a plan for adding the power tongs back into 7K. The group decided to have a meeting on June 26, 2017 at the Calgary conference. f. Item 6201: 2 year extension for API 7L Motion: Have SC8 send request for 2 year 7L extension to CSOEM Motion By: Robert Urbanowski Second BY: Kurt Vandervort Motion Passed. Work Group for reviewing API 7L: Robert Urbanowski (Chairman), Shawn Firenza, Surya Komaragiri. Page 13 of 14

14 After The June 2016 Conference: A draft of API 7L (revised) was circulated within the workgroup for comments. This draft did not include any modifications to the following sections, since other workgroups are working on possible changes to same: (a) blowout preventer (BOP) handling systems, and (b) high-pressure mud and cement hose assemblies. Comments received on the rest of the document have been resolved, with the exception inspection frequencies in Table 1 Periodic Inspection and Maintenance Categories and Frequencies. The draft was recirculated in the workgroup for comments. 5. New Business Drilling and Well Servicing Equipment (Items 72XX) a. Design Validation: Ensure API 7K is in line with API Q1 b. 6. Adjournment Page 14 of 14