Regular Session. Legislative Regular Agenda

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Regular Session. Legislative Regular Agenda"

Robert Jennings
5 years ago
Views:

1 Notice of Meeting for the Historic and Architectural Review Commission of the City of Georgetown May 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM at Council and Courts Building, 101 East 7th Street Georgetown, TX The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission, appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on applications, by issuing Certificates of Design Compliance based upon the City Council adopted Downtown Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Welcome and Meeting Procedures: Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission.) Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant Comments from Citizens * Applicant Response Commission Deliberative Process Commission Action * Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes. Legislative Regular Agenda B Review and possible approval of the minutes of the April 23, 2015 meeting. C Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior paint for the property located at West 9 th Street bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 6-7 (PTS),.1446 acres (CDC ). D Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior paint for the property located at 823 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description of Page 1 of 29

2 E F City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 8 (S/PT), acres (CDC ). Consideration and possible action to recommend the creation of the Historic Resource Survey Subcommittee - Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. G Staff updates and reminder of upcoming meetings related to HARC. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the day of, 2015, at, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. Jessica Brettle, City Secretary Page 2 of 29

3 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: The Historic and Architectural Review Commission, appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on applications, by issuing Certificates of Design Compliance based upon the City Council adopted Downtown Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Welcome and Meeting Procedures: Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission.) Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant Comments from Citizens * Applicant Response Commission Deliberative Process Commission Action * Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: na SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary Page 3 of 29

4 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Review and possible approval of the minutes of the April 23, 2015 meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes of May 23, 2015 Regular Meeting Type Backup Material Page 4 of 29

5 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior paint for the property located at West 9 th Street bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 6-7 (PTS),.1446 acres (CDC ). ITEM SUMMARY: The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior paint for the structure located at West 9 th Street. According to the submitted letter of intent, the applicant wishes to paint the exterior of the structure. Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the approval criteria of Section of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the attached Staff Report. The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The applicant paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description CDC Staff Report CDC Exhibit Building Permit CDC Exhibit 2 - Plans and Specifications Type Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Page 5 of 29

6 Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting Date: May 28, 2015 File Number: CDC AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior paint for the property located at West 9 th Street, bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 6-7 (PTS),.1446 acres AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: West 9 th Street Exterior Paint Project Applicant: Rick O Donnell Property Owner: Robert Stern Property Address: West 9 th Street Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 6-7 (PTS),.1446 acres Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 1 Case History: This is the first review for this project HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of construction: 1935, significantly altered in 1985 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 Medium Low National Register Designation: Noncontributing structure within the NR district Texas Historical Commission Designation: None APPLICANT S REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Design Compliance for exterior paint for the structure located at West 9 th Street. APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines: GUIDELINES FINDINGS 11.1 Develop a color scheme for the entire building that coordinates all the façade Complies elements Paint colors should enhance individual building elements while creating a Complies unified, coordinated appearance for the entire structure A muted color is preferred for the base color of most buildings. Complies 11.8 Leave natural masonry finishes unpainted when feasible. Does not comply CDC West 9 th Street Page 1 of 3 Page 6 of 29

7 Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant s request for exterior paint for the historic structure is in compliance with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines with one exception. Guideline 11.8 states that natural masonry surfaces shall be left unpainted. However, the subject structure was significantly altered in 1985, as documented by the attached building permit file, which includes approval for the changes from the Historic Preservation Commission. The alteration included the installation of the current brick façade, using modern brick. Modern brick is fired at higher temperatures and is less susceptible to moisture damage. Therefore, staff is in support of the applicant s request for painting the masonry. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the following criteria: SECTION CRITERIA A. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; B. Compliance with any design standards of the Unified Development Code; C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay District; D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is preserved. E. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding historic properties. F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable Overlay District is protected. G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted design standards, and are not in character with the site or landmarks within the Historic or applicable Overlay District in question will not be permitted. H. The following may also be considered by the HARC when determining whether to approve a Certificate for Design Compliance: 1. The effect of the proposed change upon the FINDINGS The application is deemed complete by staff. The design Standards of the UDC do not apply to this project. The proposed project complies with the Design Guidelines, with the exception outlined above. The project does not adversely affect the integrity of the structure. No new buildings or additions are proposed for this project. The proposed project does not have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Downtown Overlay District. No signage is proposed for this project. The proposed project has a limited impact upon the overall district. The proposed color project is in compliance with the Guidelines and the structure does not possess any CDC West 9 th Street Page 2 of 3 Page 7 of 29

8 Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission SECTION CRITERIA general historic, cultural, and architectural nature of the site, landmark, or District. 2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural features, including parking and loading spaces, which can be seen from a public street, alley, or walkway. 3. The general design, arrangement, texture, material, and color of the building or structure and the relation of such factors to similar features of buildings or structures in the District, contrast or other relation of such factors to other landmarks built at or during the same period, as well as the uniqueness of such features, considering the remaining examples of architectural, historical, and cultural values. FINDINGS significant historic features, due to the 1985 alterations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC as proposed by the applicant. PUBLIC COMMENTS As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the request. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit Building Permit and Historic Preservation Commission decision Exhibit 2 Plans and Specifications SUBMITTED BY Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner CDC West 9 th Street Page 3 of 3 Page 8 of 29

9 Page 9 of 29

10 Page 10 of 29

11 Page 11 of 29

12 Page 12 of 29

13 Page 13 of 29

14 Page 14 of 29

15 Page 15 of 29

16 Page 16 of 29

17 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior paint for the property located at 823 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 8 (S/PT), acres (CDC ). ITEM SUMMARY: The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior paint for the structure located at 823 South Austin Avenue. According to the submitted letter of intent, the applicant wishes to paint the exterior of the structure. Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the approval criteria of Section of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the attached Staff Report. The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The applicant paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description CDC Staff Report CDC Exhibit 1 Type Exhibit Exhibit Page 17 of 29

18 Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting Date: May 28, 2015 File Number: CDC AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior paint for the property located at 823 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 8 (S/PT) acres AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: 823 South Austin Avenue Exterior Paint Project Applicant: Rick O Donnell Property Owner: Robert Stern Property Address: 823 South Austin Avenue Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 51, Lot 8 (S/PT) acres Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 1 Case History: This is the first review for this project HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of construction: 1925 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 Medium Medium National Register Designation: Contributing structure within the NR district Texas Historical Commission Designation: None APPLICANT S REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Design Compliance for exterior paint for the structure located at 823 South Austin Avenue. APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines: GUIDELINES FINDINGS 11.1 Develop a color scheme for the entire building that coordinates all the façade Complies elements Paint colors should enhance individual building elements while creating a Complies unified, coordinated appearance for the entire structure A muted color is preferred for the base color of most buildings. Complies 11.4 Roof colors must complement the style and overall color scheme of the structure Complies CDC South Austin Avenue Page 1 of 3 Page 18 of 29

19 Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant s request for exterior paint for the historic structure is in compliance with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. The proposed base color is a muted color, with accent colors proposed for the architectural details. The roof color also complements the proposed structure and coordinates with the adjacent structure. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the following criteria: SECTION CRITERIA A. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; B. Compliance with any design standards of the Unified Development Code; C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay District; D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is preserved. E. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding historic properties. F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable Overlay District is protected. G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted design standards, and are not in character with the site or landmarks within the Historic or applicable Overlay District in question will not be permitted. H. The following may also be considered by the HARC when determining whether to approve a Certificate for Design Compliance: 1. The effect of the proposed change upon the general historic, cultural, and architectural nature of the site, landmark, or District. 2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural FINDINGS The application is deemed complete by staff. The design standards of the UDC do not apply to this project. The proposed project complies with the Design Guidelines, with the exception outlined above. The project does not adversely affect the integrity of the structure. No new buildings or additions are proposed for this project. The proposed project does not have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Downtown Overlay District. No signage is proposed for this project. The proposed project has a limited impact upon the overall district. The proposed color project is in compliance with the Guidelines, providing a muted base color and highlighting the appropriate elements. CDC South Austin Avenue Page 2 of 3 Page 19 of 29

20 Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission SECTION CRITERIA features, including parking and loading spaces, which can be seen from a public street, alley, or walkway. 3. The general design, arrangement, texture, material, and color of the building or structure and the relation of such factors to similar features of buildings or structures in the District, contrast or other relation of such factors to other landmarks built at or during the same period, as well as the uniqueness of such features, considering the remaining examples of architectural, historical, and cultural values. FINDINGS STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC as proposed by the applicant. PUBLIC COMMENTS As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding the request. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 Plans and Specifications SUBMITTED BY Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner CDC South Austin Avenue Page 3 of 3 Page 20 of 29

21 Page 21 of 29

22 Page 22 of 29

23 Page 23 of 29

24 Page 24 of 29

25 Page 25 of 29

26 Page 26 of 29

27 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to recommend the creation of the Historic Resource Survey Subcommittee - Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ITEM SUMMARY: The City of Georgetown is updating the existing 1984 and 2007 historic resource surveys. the survey is a key tool for the historic preservation program and serves as the basis for many decisions. Staff wishes to create the Historic Resource Survey Subcommittee to assist staff throughout the survey process. Article VI of the Commission bylaws authorizes the Commission to create subcommittees for specific projects related to Commission matters. Subcommittees with non-members require Council approval prior to their formation. The Survey Subcommittee will be comprised of the following people: 1. Historic and Architectural Review Commission Chair or designee 2. City of Georgetown Planning Director or designee 3. Chief Building Official or designee 4. Citizen at Large with an interest in historic preservation 5. Georgetown Heritage Society President or designee The Survey Subcommittee will work with City staff and the selected project consultant to manage the survey project and provide updates to the Historic and Architectural Review Commission. The Subcommittee will work closely with staff to ensure timely completion of the survey and assist with the coordination of additional research and other services. The proposed members work closely with the current survey and will continue to play an active role in the utilization of the survey. Requested action: Staff requests a motion to recommend the creation of the Survey Subcommittee to the City Council FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not applicable. SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner Page 27 of 29

28 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. ITEM SUMMARY: Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary Page 28 of 29

29 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review May 28, 2015 SUBJECT: ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: na SUBMITTED BY: Page 29 of 29

Regular Session. Legislative Regular Agenda. Adjournment

Regular Session. Legislative Regular Agenda. Adjournment Notice of Meeting for the of the City of Georgetown at 8:30 AM at the Williamson County Courthouse, 2nd Floor North Conference Room, 710 S. Main St., Georgetown, Texas. The City of Georgetown is committed