APPENDIX A Comment Letters on the Draft EIR

Transcription

1 APPENDIX A Comment Letters on the Draft EIR

2 Comment Letter No. A1 1-1

3 Comment Letter No. A1 1-1

4 Comment Letter No. A2 2-1

5 Comment Letter No. A2 2-1

6 Comment Letter No. A

7 Comment Letter No. A

8 Comment Letter No. A3

9 Comment Letter A3

10 Comment Letter No. A4 4-1

11 Comment Letter A4

12 Comment Letter No. A

13 Comment Letter No. A

14 Comment Letter No. A

15 Comment Letter No. A

16 Comment Letter No. A

17 Comment Letter No. A

18 Comment Letter No. A

19 Comment Letter No. A

20 Comment Letter No. A

21 Comment Letter No. A

22 Comment Letter No. A

23 Comment Letter No. A6

24 Comment Letter No. A6

25 Comment Letter No. A6

26 Comment Letter No. A6

27 Comment Letter No. A6

28 Comment Letter No. A6

29 Comment Letter No. A6

30 Comment Letter No. A6

31 Comment Letter No. A6

32 Comment Letter No. A6

33 Comment Letter No. A6

34 Comment Letter No. A6

35 Comment Letter No. A6

36 Comment Letter No. A6

37 Comment Letter No. A6

38 Comment Letter No. A

39 Comment Letter No. A7 7-6

40 Comment Letter No. A

41 Comment Letter No. A

42 Comment Letter No. A8 Comment Letter No. A

43 Comment Letter No. A

44 Comment Letter No. A8 Comment Letter No. A

45 Comment Letter No. A

46 Comment Letter No. A9 From: "Heidi McWhorter" To: "'Rowena Lau'" "David Somers" "Jimmy Liao" Date: 1/25/2007 3:06:03 PM Subject: FW: Ponte Vista - Notice of Completion and Availability of DraftEIR Ms. Lau, Thank you for your correspondence. I am forwarding your comment to the City Planning Department so that it can be addressed in the Final EIR. Thank you, Heidi McWhorter Senior Environmental Planner heidi.mcwhorter@cajaeir.com Christopher A. Joseph & Associates Environmental Planning and Research Oakland Office th Street, Suite 514 Oakland, CA Phone: (510) , ext. 14 Fax: (510) Original Message----- From: Rowena Lau [mailto:rowena.lau@lacity.org] Sent: Thursday, January 25, :53 PM To: heidi.mcwhorter@cajaeir.com Cc: Abdulsamad Danishwar; Rowena Lau Subject: Ponte Vista - Notice of Completion and Availability of DraftEIR To: Heidi McWhorter, We were reviewing through your draft EIR for the project stated above and it seems that our previous response letter was not included in the draft. Instead only a copy of the SCAR approval was submitted as a part of the appendix. The response letter was in regards to your previous Wastewater Service Information was sent to us on 1/25/2006. Also, according to our first response, your projected wastewater discharge was 411,363 gpd, but in the Draft EIR it states 279,800, which is close to the approved SCAR. Is that the current flow you are not requesting for? Please add the requested response into the Draft EIR and resubmit it for further comments. Thank you! Rowena Lau Sanitary Engineering Associate

47 Comment Letter No. A9 City of LA - Bureau of Sanitation Wastewater Engineering Services Division Rowena.Lau@lacity.org CC: "'Abdulsamad Danishwar'" <Abdulsamad.Danishwar@lacity.org>, "Rob Carnachan" <rob.carnachan@cajaeir.com>

48 Comment Letter No. A

49 Comment Letter No. A10 Comment Letter No. A

50 Comment Letter No. A

51 Comment Letter No. A10

52 Comment Letter No. A

53 Comment Letter No. A

54 Comment Letter No. A

55 Comment Letter No. A

56 Comment Letter No. A

57 Comment Letter No. A

58 10-20 Comment Letter No. A

59 Comment Letter No. A10 Comment Letter No. A

60 Comment Letter No. A

61 Comment Letter No. A

62 Comment Letter No. A

63 Comment Letter No. A

64 Comment Letter No. A

65 Comment Letter No. A

66 Comment Letter No. A

67 Comment Letter No. A

68 Comment Letter No. A

69 Comment Letter No. A

70 Comment Letter No. A

71 Comment Letter No. A

72 Comment Letter No. A

73 Comment Letter No. A

74 Comment Letter No. A

75 Comment Letter No. A

76 Comment Letter No. A

77 Comment Letter No. A

78 Comment Letter No. A

79 Comment Letter No. A

80 Comment Letter No. A

81 Comment Letter No. A

82 Comment Letter No. A

83 Comment Letter No. A

84 Comment Letter No. A

85 Comment Letter No. A

86 Comment Letter No. A

87 Comment Letter No. A

88 Comment Letter No. A

89 Comment Letter No. A

90 Comment Letter No. A

91 Comment Letter No. A

92 Comment Letter No. A

93 Comment Letter No. A

94 Comment Letter No. A

95 Comment Letter No. A

96 Comment Letter No. A

97 Comment Letter No. A

98 Comment Letter No. A

99 Comment Letter No. A

100 Comment Letter No. A

101 Comment Letter No. A

102 Comment Letter No. A

103 Comment Letter No. A

104 Comment Letter No. A

105 Comment Letter No. A10

106 Comment Letter No. A

107 Comment Letter No. A12 From: To: Date: Subject: LOS ANGELES Jimmy Liao Suk Chong 1/30/2007 5:02:03 PM Re: PONTE VISTA - DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF Dear Mr. Chong: Comments received. Thank you. Your comments will be taken into consideration in the preparation of the Final EIR. Have a great day. Jimmy Liao >>> "Chong, Suk" <SCHONG@dpw.lacounty.gov> 1/30/2007 3:54 PM >>> PONTE VISTA DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF LOS ANGELES The proposed project, located at South Western Avenue on the east side of Western Avenue, generally between Green Hills Drive and Avenida Aprenda in the Wilmington-Harbor City area of the City of Los Angeles, consists of the development of 2,300 residential dwelling units, including 1,725 condominium units and 575 senior housing units. The project also proposes to accommodate vehicular access to Mary Star of the Sea High School, which is located immediately east of the project. As a result, the traffic from the 600-student high school, which was previously approved by the City, is included with the traffic from the proposed project in the Draft Environmental Impact Report. The proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 9,355 vehicle trips daily, with 636 and 760 vehicle trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. We generally agree with the study that the traffic generated by the project alone would not have a significant impact to any County or County/City roadways or intersections. However, the cumulative traffic generated by the project and other related projects will significantly impact the following County intersections. We request that the City condition the project to pay the County for its proportionate share of the cost for the following mitigation measures prior to the City issuing any building permit for the project These mitigation measures should also be included in Table 1-1, Executive Summary of Project Impacts Mitigation Measures and Impacts after Mitigations of the Environmental Impact Report. * Normandie Avenue at Sepulveda Boulevard North approach: One left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one exclusive right-turn lane (add one through lane) South approach: One left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through/right-turn lane (add one through lane). The project's proportionate share is 2.7 percent.

108 Comment Letter No. A12 * Normandie Avenue at Lomita Boulevard South approach: Two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane (add one left-turn lane) The project's proportionate share is 11.8 percent. * Vermont Avenue at Sepulveda Boulevard East approach: Two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared through/right-turn lane (add one left-turn lane). South approach: One left-turn lane, two through lanes, and two exclusive right-turn lanes (add one exclusive right-turn lane) The project's proportionate share is 3.7 percent. * Vermont Avenue at Lomita Boulevard North approach: One left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one exclusive right-turn lane (add one exclusive right-turn lane). South approach: One left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one exclusive right-turn lane (add one exclusive right-turn lane) The project's proportionate share is 16.4 percent. We further request that the City condition the project to submit conceptual drawings and cost estimates to Matthew Dubiel of our Traffic and Lighting Division for the proposed mitigation measures noted above. He can be reached at (626) Suk Chong Senior Civil Engineer County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Land Development Division (626) CC: David Somers

109 Comment Letter No. A

110 Comment Letter No. A

111 Comment Letter No. A

112 Comment Letter No. A

113 Comment Letter No. A

114 Comment Letter No. A

115 Comment Letter No. A

116 Comment Letter No. A

117 Comment Letter No. A

118 Comment Letter No. A

119 Comment Letter No. A

120 Comment Letter No. A

121 Comment Letter No. A

122 Comment Letter No. A

123 Comment Letter No. A

124 Comment Letter No. A

125 Comment Letter No. A

126 Comment Letter No. A