Comment Letter No
|
|
- Bryan Summers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comment Letter No
2 Comment Letter No
3 Comment Letter No
4 Comment Letter No
5 Comment Letter No
6 Comment Letter No
7 Comment Letter No
8 Comment Letter No
9 Comment Letter No
10 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Comment Letter No. 6 Richard MacNaughton 9107 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 700 Beverly Hills, California March 18, 2006 Response 6-1 Commentor Richard MacNaughton states that the City web site contains incorrect information regarding the project. The commentor refers to the City s Case Information page which contains information regarding the previously proposed Whole Foods Market project. The comment is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. However, the Case Information page is not the mechanism by which the City provides notice to the public with respect to CEQA. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Proposed Project s Draft EIR (Appendix A to the Draft EIR) was circulated to agencies, organizations, persons who had expressed interest in the project and all owners and occupants located within 500 feet of the project site on May 9, The Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR was provided to the same distribution list when the Draft EIR was circulated. This notice was also posted on the City s Environmental Information website (cityplanning.lacity.org Environmental Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)). The text of the notice provided on the web site is shown below. This information was correct at the time of the Draft EIR and was consistent with the project description and analysis contained in the Draft EIR. All noticing associated with the NOP and Draft EIR was provided as required by CEQA Guidelines Sections and The following is the verbatim text from the notice published on the City s Environmental Information website: Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-47
11 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Hollywood- Garfield Mixed Use Development Case No EIR State Clearinghouse Number Council District 4 Hollywood Project Address: 5555 Hollywood Boulevard, 1711, 1717, ¾ North Garfield Place Project Description The proposed project consists of the new construction of a mixed-use development containing 108 multi-family residential units and 10,000 square feet of commercial/retail space. Parking for the proposed project would be contained in two parking levels (one ground level and one subterranean). REVIEW LOCATIONS AND COMMENT DUE DATE: If you wish to submit comments following review of the Draft EIR please submit them in writing by May 19, Jonathan Riker, Environmental Review Coordinator Environmental Review Section Department of City Planning 200 North Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, California Hardcopies of the Draft Environmental Impact Report or the documents referenced in the EIR, are available for review at the following locations: Department of City Planning 200 North Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA Central Library 630 W. 6th Street Los Angeles, CA Los Feliz Branch Library 1874 Hillhurst Avenue Los Angeles, CA Will and Ariel Durant Regional Library 7140 W. Sunset Boulevard Los Angeles, CA Response 6-2 The commentor suggests that the applicant is advertising the project site for sale with less parking than previously represented. The Draft EIR stated that the project would provide parking meeting City Code requirements, with the potential to include up to 183 parking spaces. The project has been since revised Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-48
12 City of Los Angeles August 2006 to increase parking supply to 190 spaces, while reducing the residential unit count from 108 to 90 and commercial square footage from 10,000 to 6,000. Parking supply would not only exceed the City s minimum requirements for the proposed uses, but would exceed the maximum parking supply permitted under the SNAP by four spaces, if the requested exception from the SNAP is approved. The Proposed Project would provide for its own parking needs on site and would not contribute to neighborhood parking impacts. Response 6-3 The commentor asserts that the information provided on the Case Information page deprives the public of sufficient information to meaningfully respond. As noted above in Response 6-1, the Case Information page is not the means by which this information and noticing is provided. The City provided proper notice of both the NOP and Draft EIR and the Draft EIR was made available for a public comment period of 45 days, as required by CEQA. Since the commentor s letter preceded the release of the Draft EIR for public and agency review, this comment was premature. The Draft EIR included a complete project description meeting the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section and consideration and discussion of significant environmental impacts meeting the requirements of Guidelines Section The commentor did not submit comments relating to the Draft EIR during the designated public comment period. Response 6-4 The commentor suggests that the location of the project driveway was being withheld from public view. This suggestion is incorrect. The Draft EIR shows a site plan (Figure II-3, page II-5) that indicates the location of the project driveway on Garfield Place. The driveway is located a safe distance north of the Garfield/Hollywood intersection, 100 feet, with room for five northbound vehicles to queue south of the driveway. With only 48 cars approaching the driveway in the northbound direction on Garfield during the PM peak hour, attempting to turn left into the site across 101 southbound vehicles (one every 36 seconds), there should not be a queue of more than one or two vehicles at any one time. The driveway is located so as not to attract traffic too far north onto Garfield in order to reduce the impact on the residential portion of the street. Response 6-5 The commentor suggests that the project has no room for a dedicated right turn lane from Garfield onto Hollywood Boulevard, even though the Councilmember for the area reportedly favors such dedicated lanes. The level of service calculations at the intersection of Hollywood Boulevard/Garfield Place were conducted with the assumption of one shared left turn/right turn lane and the level of service was shown to be LOS C in the a.m. peak hour and LOS B in the p.m. peak hour, including Proposed Project traffic. The intersection therefore operates at an acceptable level of service without the dedicated right turn only lane. If needed in the future, the right turn lane could be provided by prohibiting parking along the project frontage on the west side of Garfield Place, south of the project driveway, but this would reduce the supply of on-street parking. Regardless, inclusion of a dedicated right turn lane at this location would not be warranted, based on projected traffic conditions at project completion. Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-49
13 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Response 6-6 The commentor cites a noise study conducted by the Community Redevelopment Agency in conjunction with the First Amendment to the Hollywood Redevelopment Plan to suggest that unacceptable noise levels currently exist in the project area which would be exascerbated by the Proposed Project. The analysis that was conducted for the Redevelopment Amendment EIR was a program level analysis that was designed to address the potential effects a 26-year buildout of the Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area, with resulting total development levels of over 20 million square feet of commercial development and 5,800 residential units. The analysis considered a representative sample of roadway segments located throughout the Redevelopment Project Area. The segment referred to by the commentor consisted of Hollywood Boulevard, East of Wilton Place, a 0.3 mile segment that experiences varying traffic levels and notably higher levels closer to the freeway (away from the project site). The Draft EIR, on the other hand, included an analysis of multiple locations immediately adjacent to the project site and in the surrounding area that more accurately represents existing noise levels at and near the project site. The monitored noise levels ranged from 55.6 dba to 65.6 dba (Draft EIR, page IV.D-5). These levels are within the normally acceptable (up to 65 dba) and conditionally acceptable (up to 70 dba) ranges 3 for multi-family residential areas (Draft EIR, page IV.D-9). Noise levels were also modeled, based on current traffic counts, at smaller segments on Hollywood Boulevard. These modeled noise levels ranged from 62.2 to 63.8 dba between Western Avenue and Wilton Place (Draft EIR, page IV.D-7), within the Normally Acceptable level for multifamily residential uses. These measurements and calculations provide a considerably more refined analysis of the existing noise levels than is provided in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR analysis. The Draft EIR also includes an analysis of potential increase in projected traffic noise levels as a result of project and cumulative traffic. The analysis shows that projected noise level increases would be less than the 3 dba threshold of audibility and therefore impacts associated with traffic noise would be less than significant. Response 6-7 The commentor suggests that the features of the project directly relevant to transportation and noise have been withheld from the public. This suggestion is incorrect. The relevant features of the Proposed Project, along with the resulting impacts related to traffic and noise, were included in the Draft EIR, which was circulated for public and agency review after the commentor submitted this letter. Response 6-8 The commentor suggests that the applicant intends to sell the property. Any intentions of the applicant beyond those expressed in the development application submitted to the City that is the subject of this EIR are irrelevant. The City is obligated under CEQA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project whenever a development application is filed. Any change that may occur in the ultimate use of the property, if any, is speculative and beyond the scope of this EIR. 3 Conditionally Acceptable means new construction should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in project design. Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-50
14 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Response 6-9 The commentor asserts that the public s right to make intelligent contributions has been abridged. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. With respect to information provided as part of the noticing process for the EIR, see Response No However, considering that the commentor submitted this letter prior to public circulation and review of the Draft EIR and did not submit any comments on the Draft EIR during the designated review period, this comment must be considered premature. As evidenced by other comment letters received during the designated review period, the public was provided ample opportunity to comment on the project and the analyses provided in the Draft EIR. Response 6-10 The commentor suggests that, because the applicant does not intend to building on the lot, the EIR process should be ended. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. With respect to the City s obligations regarding the applicant s intentions for the project site, see Response No Response 6-11 The commentor provided information regarding potential sale of the project site. As noted in Response 6-8, the applicant has submitted an application for development of the proposed project site that the City is obligated to process. This EIR comprises a part of that development review process under City procedures. Response 6-12 The commentor provided a printout of the Case Information Summary Sheet regarding the project site. As noted in Response No. 6-1, this site does not provide official noticing of actions taken by the City under CEQA. The Case Information has been updated. Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-51
15 7-1
16
17 7-3
18
19
20
21 7-9
22 7-9
23 7-9
24 7-9
25 7-9
26 7-9
27 7-9
28 7-9
29 7-9
30 7-9
31 7-9
32 7-9
33 7-9
34 7-9
35 7-9
36 7-9
37 7-9
38 7-9
39 7-9
40 7-9
41 7-10
42 7-10
43 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Richard MacNaughton Hollywoodians Encouraging Local Planning 9107 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 700 Beverly Hills, California March 17, 2006 Response 7-1 Commentor Hollywoodians Encouraging Local Planning indicates that the applicant has not returned to the Planning and Land Use Management Committee of the Hollywood United Neighborhood Council and therefore no community organization will support the Proposed Project. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decisionmakers. Response 7-2 The commentor suggests that the applicant is selling the property and is using the EIR process to increase the sales price. See Response Nos. 6-8 and Response 7-3 The commentor suggests that noise levels in the area are already unacceptable. See Response No In addition, the commentor suggests that, based on the CRA analysis, future noise levels with the project would be unacceptable. The commentor s reliance on the CRA analysis for conclusions related to the Proposed Project is misleading. The CRA analysis was based on a 26-year buildout of the entire Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area, including, in varying combinations, total development of up to 20 million square feet of commercial development and up to 5,800 housing units throughout the Redevelopment Project Area. This is a considerably larger increase in development than would occur under the Proposed Project. As noted in Response 6-6, a specific analysis of the potential traffic noise impacts of the Proposed Project, as well as related projects, was included in the Draft EIR, which concludes that project-related and cumulative increases in noise levels would be below the City s significance threshold and that resulting noise levels would be within acceptable levels for multi-family residential areas. Response 7-4 The commentor suggests that resulting noise levels, based on the CRA analysis of Maximum Development within the Redevelopment Project Area, would constitute an unacceptable impacts on the St. Francis Hotel. As noted in Response 6-15, reliance on the CRA s analysis of full buildout of the Redevelopment Project Area for purposes of determining the impacts of the Proposed Project is misleading. The analysis conducted for the Proposed Project and contained in the Draft EIR shows that the projected traffic noise level, including project traffic, would be 64.2 dba on Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-80
44 City of Los Angeles August 2006 between Western and Garfield, and 58.3 dba on Garfield Place north of Hollywood Boulevard (Draft EIR, page IV.D-15). These projected noise levels would be within the Normally Acceptable level for multi-family residential and hotel uses (Draft EIR, Table IV.D-5, page IV.D-9). The maximum projectrelated traffic noise increase would be 1.5 dba on Garfield Place, which would be below the City s significance threshold of 3 dba increase. Project-related noise impacts on the St. Francis Hotel would therefore be less than significant. Response 7-5 The commentor suggests that the applicant has failed to work with the community. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. The project applicant presented the Proposed Project to the Planning and Land Use Committee of the Hollywood United Neighborhood Council on January 11, Response 7-6 The commentor suggests that the project site be utilized for additional off-street parking in conjunction with implementation of the shared street concept on Garfield Place. See Response Nos and Response 7-7 The commentor suggests that the applicant intends to sell the property and therefore a new applicant and EIR are needed. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. See Response Nos. 6-8 and Response 7-8 The commentor suggests that the EIR process should be discontinued. See Response No Response 7-9 The commentor included a copy of Section III.H, Noise of the Hollywood Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR. See Response Nos. 6-6, 7-3 and 7-4. Response 7-10 The commentor provided information regarding potential sale of the project site. See Response Nos. 6-8 and Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-81
45 Comment Letter No
46 Comment Letter No
47 Comment Letter No
48 Comment Letter No
49 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Comment Letter No. 8 Richard MacNaughton 9107 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 700 Beverly Hills, California February 6, 2006 Response 8-1 Commentor Richard MacNaughton indicates that the information on the City s Case Information regarding the project site is incorrect. See Response Nos. 6-1 and Response 8-2 The commentor asks whether the applicant has provided additional information and whether a positive EIR is about to issue. Subsequent to issuance of the Revised Notice of Preparation for the Proposed Project on May 9, 2005, preparation of the Draft EIR was initiated. The applicant provided necessary information over the course of preparing the Draft EIR to allow for thorough and accurate analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. With respect to the second question, EIRs are not positive or negative. An EIR is intended to provide factual analysis reflecting the independent judgment of the lead agency as to the potential environmental effects of the project. The City has established thresholds of significance for environmental impacts, that are identified in the Draft EIR. If a project exceeds the threshold of significance, it is identified as having a significant impact on the environment. If the project s impact is below the significance threshold, the impact is identified as less than significant. Complete discussion of the potential impacts of the Proposed Project is contained in the Draft EIR. Response 8-3 The commentor suggests that the City has tainted the EIR process by providing false information. See Response Nos. 6-1 and 6-9. Response 8-4 The commentor suggests that, if a new EAF number has been issued for the Proposed Project, the City should circulate a new NOP. A new EAF number was not issued for the Proposed Project. The Revised NOP for the Proposed Project, which provided information regarding the mixed use project that was evaluated in the Draft EIR, was circulated for public and agency review on May 9, The Draft EIR was circulated for public and agency review from April 4, 2006 to May, 19, A copy of the Draft EIR was provided to persons who had previously commented on the project in the NOP process. The Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR was also provided to all owners and occupants within 500 feet of the project site (see Response No. 6-1). Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-86
50 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Response 8-5 The commentor reiterates prior objections to the May 9, 2005 NOP. The comment is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. The commentor s objections to the May 9, 2005 NOP related to the identification of issues to be included in the Draft EIR (see Appendix B to the Draft EIR). The justification for including certain issues in the Draft EIR under the title Impacts Found to be Less Than Significant is contained in the Draft EIR (pages IV.A-1 through IV.A-30). The commentor submitted no timely comments as to the sufficiency of the analysis contained in this section of the Draft EIR. Response 8-6 The commentor reiterates comments related to the deficiency of the NOP and City web site information. The comment is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. See Response Nos. 6-1, 6-9 and 8-5. Response 8-7 The commentor provided a copy of a letter from the project applicant, dated June 2005, that announced that the previous commercial project for the project site was no longer viable and that the project was being redesigned as a mixed use project containing 108 residential units and 10,000 square feet of retail uses. This information was consistent with the project description provided in the May 9, 2005 Notice of Preparation and with the analysis presented in the Draft EIR. This letter was sent by the applicant to approximately community stakeholders and other parties who had indicated interest following the progress of the commercial project and in locating a Whole Foods Market in Hollywood. This letter, along with the revised NOP, undermines the commentor s contention that misleading information was provided to the public. Response 8-8 The commentor provided a printout of the Case Information Summary Sheet regarding the project site. As noted in Response No. 6-1, this site does not provide official noticing of actions taken by the City under CEQA. The Case Information has been updated. Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-87
51 Comment Letter No
52 City of Los Angeles August 2006 Comment Letter No. 9 David Fincher May 2, 2006 Response 9-1 Commentor David Fincher suggests that the proposed development would not be consistent with the neighborhood and will not be properly maintained. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. Because the residential uses within the Proposed Project will be condominiums, responsibility for maintenance of the residential component will be shared among the condominium owners. Response 9-2 The commentor expresses concerns over the traffic impacts of the project. The traffic impacts of the Proposed Project were evaluated in the Draft EIR (pages IV.E-1 through IV.E-23). Project-related traffic would not cause the City s significance threshold to be exceeded at any of the 12 study intersections. Therefore the Draft EIR concludes that the traffic impacts of the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Response 9-3 The commentor expresses support for the previously proposed Whole Foods project on the project site. The commentor s opinion is noted and will be considered by the decision makers. However, the previously proposed Whole Foods project was voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant after the prospective tenant withdrew from the project (Draft EIR, page I-2). See also Comment and Response No. 8-7). Hollywood/Garfield Mixed-Use Development Final Environmental Impact Report IV. Responses to Comments Page IV-89
ORDINANCE NO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.6 ORDINANCE NO. 23-2016 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE ADOPTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER, LP WHEREAS, on
More informationFwd: Council File: message
Etta Armstrong Fwd: Council File: 13-1134 1 message Sharon Gin To: Etta Armstrong Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:08 AM --------- Forwarded
More informationAnd: Council No: 14 - Huizar CPC GPA-ZC; CPC SN; and CPC DA-CU-MCUP-CUX-SPR
To Owners: Within a 100-Foot Radius Within a 500-Foot Radius Abutting a Proposed Development Site And Occupants: And: Within a 100-Foot Radius Within a 500-Foot Radius Interested Parties/Others This notice
More informationCITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.1 AGENDA TITLE: Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Multi-Agency Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans, SACOG,
More information(DIRECTOR, AREA PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY PUNNING COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL)
Master Appeal Form City of Los Angeles - Department of City Planning APPEAL TO THE: City Council (DIRECTOR, AREA PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY PUNNING COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL) REGARDING CASE #: Case No. CPC-2014-666-VCU-ZAA-SPR,
More informationExecutive Summary General Plan Amendment, Planning Code Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment
Executive Summary General Plan Amendment, Planning Code Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 CONTINUED FROM: JULY 16, 2015 & AUGUST 13, 2015 Project Name: Case Number:
More informationExecutive Summary General Plan Amendment, Planning Code Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment
Executive Summary General Plan Amendment, Planning Code Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: AUGUST 13, 2015 CONTINUED FROM: JULY 16, 2015 Project Name: Case Number: Initiated by: Staff
More informationYORK COUNTY GOVERNMENT
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: June 20, 2016 York County Council York County Planning Commission Audra Miller, Planning Director YORK COUNTY GOVERNMENT Planning & Development Services Proposed Revisions
More information6.0 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
6.0 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 6.1 INTRODUCTION This section documents the Mid-City/Westside Transit Corridor Study Public Involvement Program process over the course of three phases. Phase I, the Major Investment
More informationInformacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213)
Informacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213) 978-1300 Kimberly Chemerinsky, President Daphne Brogdon, Vice President Jennifer Chung Kim, Commissioner Oliver DelGado,
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014 DATE: February 7, 2014 SUBJECTS: A. PDSP #161 PHASED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for the purpose of revising Condition
More informationDEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT
DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT City Planning Commission Date: September 27, 2018 Time: After 8:30 A.M. Place: Van Nuys City Hall Council Chamber, 2nd Floor 14410 Sylvan Street Van Nuys,
More informationCITY OF KENT, OHIO ZONING CODE CHAPTER 1119 HOME BASED BUSINESSES Page CHAPTER 1119 HOME BASED BUSINESSES
HOME BASED BUSINESSES Page 1119-1 HOME BASED BUSINESSES 1119.01 Purpose 1119.02 Definitions 1119.03 Districts Where Permitted 1119.04 Limited Home Businesses 1119.05 Home Occupations 1119.06 Compliance
More information3.12 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
3.12 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.12 Transportation and Circulation This section of the Draft EIR analyzes the existing transportation system in the area and addresses the potential transportation and circulation
More informationAPPENDIX A Comment Letters on the Draft EIR
APPENDIX A Comment Letters on the Draft EIR Comment Letter No. A1 1-1 Comment Letter No. A1 1-1 Comment Letter No. A2 2-1 Comment Letter No. A2 2-1 Comment Letter No. A3 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4 3-5 Comment Letter
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. PUBLIC SERVICES 2. POLICE PROTECTION
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. PUBLIC SERVICES 2. POLICE PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) is the local law enforcement agency responsible for providing police
More informationArticle XIII. Vacation Home Rentals. 28A-68 Purpose of article. The city council of the city of South Lake Tahoe finds and declares as follows:
Article XIII. Vacation Home Rentals 28A-68 Purpose of article. The city council of the city of South Lake Tahoe finds and declares as follows: A. Vacation home rentals provide a community benefit by expanding
More informationLOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICIAL MINUTES THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2017
LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICIAL MINUTES THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2017 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, ROOM 340 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90012 THESE MINUTES OF THE LOS ANGELES
More informationTECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD DEVELOPMENT AREA RZ1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA DEVELOPMENT AREA A DEVELOPMENT AREA B
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD AREA SITE DATA Acreage: ± 2.57 acres Tax Parcel #s: 155-012-09;- 10 & -12 Existing Zoning: O-2 Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O Existing Uses: Medical and professional offices uses.
More informationAGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor & City Council Laurence S Wiener, City Attorney AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS. To:
AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: December 6, 2016 Item Number: 1-6 To: From: Subject: Honorable Mayor & City Council Laurence S Wiener, City Attorney AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS AMENDING BEVERLY
More informationFiled 2/26/19; Modified and Certified for Partial Publication on 3/20/19 (order attached)
Filed 2/26/19; Modified and Certified for Partial Publication on 3/20/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Amador) ---- IONE VALLEY LAND, AIR,
More information38 Estate Drive Zoning Application Final Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 38 Estate Drive Zoning Application Final Report Date: April 16, 2009 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Director, Community Planning, Scarborough
More informationAGENDA REPORT. INTRODUCTION This ordinance amends the Municipal Code to limit new or expanded medical uses in commercial zones.
çbev~rly~rly AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: Janua~ 11,2011 Item Number: G-6 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council From: City Attorney Subject: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS AMENDING THE BEVERLY HILLS
More informationSa>aJos. Memorandum. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: September 21, 2015 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 6
COUNCIL AGENDA: 9/22/15 ITEM: 11.2 Sa>aJos CITY OF ~ CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Harry Freitas SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: September 21, 2015 Date SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationVACATION REQUEST - VAC- E Council File No East Boulevard and South Park Avenue (portion surrounding Island Lot D)
Office of the City Engineer Los Angeles, California To the Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee Of the Honorable Council Of the City of Los Angeles June 8, 2016 Honorable Members: SUBJECT: VACATION
More informationAttachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment
Attachment 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 1785 Recommending a Zone Text Amendment RESOLUTION NO. 1785 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF
More information(JULY 2000 EDITION, Pub. by City of LA) Rev. 9/13/
Sec. 12.24 SEC. 12.24 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND OTHER SIMILAR QUASI- JUDICIAL APPROVALS. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,268, Eff. 7/1/00.) A. Applicability. This section shall apply to the conditional use
More informationAppendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance
Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 11-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1860-18,
More informationCITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 28A-TRANSIENT LODGING, ARTICLE XIII- VACATION HOME RENTALS, SECTIONS 28A-71,
More informationWEST HOLLYWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, March 3, 6:30 PM
WEST HOLLYWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, @ 6:30 PM City of West Hollywood California 1984 Regular Meeting at West Hollywood Park Auditorium 647 N. San Vicente Boulevard, West Hollywood, California
More informationArea Year 2000 Year 2030 Change. Housing Units 3,137,047 4,120, % Housing Units 1,276,578 1,637, % Population 83,070 96,
4.3 POPULATION, HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE This section describes potential project-related impacts to population, housing and employment associated with the Canoga Transportation Corridor Project.
More informationORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 1207 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MODIFYING STANDARDS FOR NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES, REHABILITATION PERMITS, AND MULTI-FAMILY PARKING (Z-S-700) AND
More informationARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE
ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 7.1 GENERAL AMENDMENTS 7-1 7.1.1 Intent 7-1 7.1.2 Authority 7-1 7.1.3 Proposal to Amend 7-1 7.1.4 Application and Fee 7-1 7.1.5 Referral for Advisory Opinion 7-2 7.1.6
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES D. SALISBURY DEPUTY CLERK B. HALL, CSL/CT.ASST.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DATE: 0//1 HONORABLE ALLAN J J.. GOODMAN HONORABLE :0 am BS JUDGE JUDGE PRO TEM Deputy Sheriff NONE SAVE HOLLYWOOD.ORG VS Defendant THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
More informationCHAPTER 110. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. R.S.39:4-8 is amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 110 AN ACT concerning municipal and county authority over roads and amending R.S.39:4-8, R.S.39:4-197, R.S.39:4-201, P.L.1945, c.284, and P.L.2004, c.107 and supplementing Title 39 of the Revised
More informationInformacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213)
Informacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213) 978-1300 Samantha Millman, President Daphne Brogdon, Vice President Kimberly Chemerinsky, Commissioner Jennifer Chung, Commissioner
More informationO2-CD Zoning. B1-CD Zoning. O2-CD Zoning. RZ-1: Technical Data Sheet CHARLOTTE ETJ LIMITS 75' CLASS C RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT, LEFT IN ACCESS POINT
SITE PROPERTY LINE VICINITY MAP --Proposed Uses: On the portion of the Site zoned O-2(CD): a health institution (hospital), medical and general offices, and medical, dental and optical laboratory uses
More informationBEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON Regarding an Application for a Conditional Use ) Case File No. Permit to Establish a Home Occupation to Host ) Events. ) (Clackamas River
More informationArticle 18 Amendments and Zoning Procedures
18.1 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATIVE BODIES. The provisions of this Article of the Zoning Ordinance shall be administered by the Planning and Land Use Department, in association with and in support of the
More informationThat the vacation of the area shown colored orange on Exhibit B, be denied.
Office of the City Engineer Los Angeles, California To the Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee Of the Honorable Council Of the City of Los Angeles February 1, 2018 Honorable Members: SUBJECT: VACATION
More informationPLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT
PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT SILVERCREEK JUNCTION 35 AND 40 SILVERCREEK PARKWAY, GUELPH Silvercreek Guelph Developments Ltd. Official Plan Amendment OP1201 Zoning Amendment Application ZC1204 May 7, 2012
More informationCITY OF ESCONDIDO. Planning Commission and Staff Seating AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION. 201 North Broadway City Hall Council Chambers. 7:00 p.m.
CITY OF ESCONDIDO Planning Commission and Staff Seating JEFF WEBER Chairman GUY WINTON Commissioner ED HALE Commissioner MERLE WATSON Commissioner AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION BOB McQUEAD Vice-Chair GREGORY
More informationMETROWEST DRI DO RESCISSION
June 20, 2017 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board C A S E # D R I 2 0 1 7-00001 I t e m # 5 METROWEST DRI DO RESCISSION DRI Subject Property Boundary Conroy-Windermere Rd. Location Map Subject
More informationFIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Burbank 275 East Olive Avenue P.O. Box 6459 Burbank, California 91510 Attention: City Clerk This document is exempt from the payment of a recording
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 13, 2010
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 13, 2010 DATE: November 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SP #106 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to Shirlington Village Comprehensive Sign Plan and Sign Guidelines
More informationATTACHMENT D. Resolution Goleta Community Plan Amendments
ATTACHMENT D Resolution Goleta Community Plan Amendments Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT D RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF SANTA BABARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER
More informationCITY OF BEVERLY HILLS ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION (Landscape Architect Position) APPLICATION
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION (Landscape Architect Position) APPLICATION TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I am interested in being considered for an appointment on the Architectural
More informationCITY OF COVINGTON Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance ADOPTED DRAFT
3.3014. Additional MUOD Requirements. In addition to the required yard, landscaped buffers, signage and screening, an enhanced landscape plan shall be required of all mixed-use developments, consistent
More informationSPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Please complete this application and provide the required information. In order for this application to be accepted, all applicable sections must be fully
More informationTEMPORA. Company s Name: of Operation: Hours. List of applic
Civic Center 18125 Bloomfield Avenue P.O. Box 3130 Cerritos, California 90703-3130 Phone: (562) 916-1201 Fax (562) 916-1371 TEMPORA RY USE PERMIT APPLICATIO N Please read the administrative guidelines
More informationPETITION FOR VARIANCE
City of Maitland 1776 Independence Lane Maitland, Florida 32751 407-539-6212 CONTENTS: 1) General Public Summary Information 2) Petition Form VARIANCE APPROVAL PROCEDURE General Summary The following is
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 21, 2018 DATE: April 13, 2018 SUBJECT: SP #362, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for the addition of approximately 1,760 square feet of new gross
More informationMINUTE RECORD PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2018
MINUTE RECORD PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2018 The Papillion met in open session at the Papillion City Hall Council Chambers on Wednesday, at 7: 00 PM. Chairwoman Rebecca Hoch called
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 6, 2005
City of West Hollywood California 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting West Hollywood Park Auditorium 647 N. San Vicente Boulevard, West Hollywood, California 90069 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair
More informationORDINANCE NO. 17_3_9_9_2_
I - ----,--.- ORDINANCE NO. 17_3_9_9_2_ An Ordinance amending Sections 11.5.7, 12.03, 12.04, 12.21, 12.22, 12.24, 12.32, 12.36, 14.00, 16.05 and 98.0403.2 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to make technical
More information21. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 15, DATE: December 6, 2018
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 15, 2018 DATE: December 6, 2018 SUBJECT: Request to authorize advertisement of public hearings by the Planning Commission and County
More informationCOUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ZONING ORDINANCE NO
Case No.: A-9960-C Applicant: TSC/MUMA Mattawoman Associates, LP COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 2-2006 AN ORDINANCE to amend the
More informationARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 240 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS NY ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 7.1 GENERAL AMENDMENTS 7-1 7.1.1 Authority 7-1 7.1.2 Proposal to Amend 7-1 7.1.3 Application and
More informationS U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A
S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A Thursday, 9:00 A.M. November 1, 2018 Hearing Room No. 3 Churchill Building, 10019-103 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Hearing
More informationLOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICIAL MINUTES THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2018
LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICIAL MINUTES THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2018 VAN NUYS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 14410 SYLVAN STREET, 2 ND FLOOR VAN NUYS CALIFORNIA 91401 THESE MINUTES OF THE LOS ANGELES
More informationCITY OF Los ANGELES CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF BUILDING AND SAFETY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF Los ANGELES CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY 201 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 VAN AMBATIELOS PRESIDENT E. FELICIA BRANNON VICE
More informationARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE
ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 7.1 GENERAL AMENDMENTS 7-1 7.1.1 Authority 7-1 7.1.2 Proposal to Amend 7-1 7.1.3 Application and Fee 7-1 7.1.4 Referral for Advisory Opinion 7-1 7.1.5 Public Hearing Notice
More informationDRAFT. City of Falls Church. Meeting Date:
1 2 DRAFT City of Falls Church Meeting Date: XX-XX-2011 Title: Ordinance To Amend Chapter 48, Zoning, Of The Code Of The City Of Falls Church, Virginia, In Order To Shift Authority For Review And Approval
More information01/13/2014 Item 16. Robles, Sandra. Subject:
Robles, Sandra Subject: FW: 2610 E. Colorado Blvd. From: Masuda, Gene Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 3:00PM To: Jomsky, Mark Cc: Sullivan, Noreen Subject: 2610 E. Colorado Blvd. Hi Mark, I am requesting
More informationMarch 20, LAX Landside Access Modernization Program and Related Amendments to the LAX Plan and LAX Specific Plan
396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 T: (415) 552-7272 F: (415) 552-5816 www.smwlaw.com JOSEPH D. PETTA Attorney petta@smwlaw.com Via E-Mail and FedEx David H. Ambroz, President City Planning Commission
More informationTOWN OF LIVONIA A LOCAL LAW -2018
TOWN OF LIVONIA A LOCAL LAW -2018 A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 150 (ZONING) OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF LIVONIA TO CHANGE VARIOUS SECTIONS AND ADD REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SHORT-TERM RENTALS Be it enacted
More informationORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.
ORDINANCE NO. 1170 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING PART II OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SUBPART B-LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 78-DEVELOPMENT
More informationChapter 205 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES
Chapter 205 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES 205.01 Purpose 205.02 Definitions 205.03 Description of Decision-Making Procedures 205.04 Type I Procedure 205.05 Type II Procedure 205.06 Type III Procedure 205.07
More information)JY" /If'- Department of Transportation
CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: June 10, 2015 To: From: 0 ~,A; Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall t tion: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee
More informationOf the City of Los Angeles July 22, Honorable Members: C. D. No. 9
Office of the City Engineer Los Angeles, California To the Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee Of the Honorable Council Of the City of Los Angeles July 22, 2015 Honorable Members: C. D. No. 9 SUBJECT:
More informationKitsap County Department of Community Development
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Staff Report and Recommendation Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process for 2018 Kingston Urban Village Center (UVC) Report Date 6/25/18; Revised 10/1/2018
More informationAMENDMENTS TO CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD ZONING ORDINANCE Amendment 1 to Ordinance No. 68 approved February 9, 2016 and effective February 28, 2016 provided for the following changes to the Zoning Ordinance:
More informationSupplemental Guide Signing Manual
Supplemental Guide Signing Manual 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 Foreword... 2 1.1 Policy... 2 2.0 Criteria For Supplemental Guide Signing... 2 2.1 Introduction... 2 2.2 Responsibility... 4 2.3 Specific Criteria...
More informationSPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - 6:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - 6:00 p.m. 1. Award of Excellence from the Municipal Information Systems Association of California (Mitch Cochran, City of
More informationThe current note, which was approved by the County Commission on July 10, 2001, restricts the plat as follows (O.R. Book 32635, Page 1549, B.C.R.
Page 1 of 21 STAFF REPORT Lauderdale Miami Auto Auction 061-MP-88 A request to amend the note on the plat has been filed with the Planning and Redevelopment Division. This plat was approved by the County
More informationREMY I MOOSE I MANLEY LLP. September 23, 2015
ORIGINAl REMY I MOOSE I MANLEY LLP Sabrina V. Teller steller@rrnmenvirolaw.com VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS The Honorable Judith L. Haller, Acting Presiding Justice The Honorable Cynthia Aaron, Associate Justice
More informationCARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney
City Hall East 200 N. Main Street Room 800 Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 978-8100 Tel (213) 978-8312 Fax CTrutanich@lacitv.org www.lacity.org/atty CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE: REPORT NO.
More informationNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND AVAILABILITY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
CITY OF L OS A NGELES C ALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND AVAILABILITY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT To Owners: Within a 100-Foot Radius Within a 500-Foot Radius
More informationORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG
ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG VILLAGE, TEXAS AMENDING ARTICLE V, ZONING REGULATIONS, SECTION 509, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS, OF THE HEDWIG VILLAGE PLANNING AND
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS MEETINGS: 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers, First Floor of City Hall. DUE DATE FOR SUBMITTALS: 2 weeks
More informationInformacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213)
Informacion en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida llamando al (213) 978-1300 Samantha Millman, President Daphne Brogdon, Vice President Kimberly Chemerinsky, Commissioner Jennifer Chung, Commissioner
More informationMANHATTAN TOWERS 1230 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 110 MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA (310) FAX (310)
MICHAEL JENKINS CHRISTI HOGIN MARK D. HENSLEY BRADLEY E. WOHLENBERG KARL H. BERGER GREGG KOVACEVICH JOHN C. COTTI ELIZABETH M. CALCIANO LAUREN B. FELDMAN JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP A LAW PARTNERSHIP MANHATTAN
More informationUp Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Title 23 ZONING
Up Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Chapter 23.105 SPECIFIC PLAN 5 Note * Prior ordinance history: Ordinances 86 O 118, 88 O 118 and 90 O 101. 23.105.010 Location. This specific plan shall encompass
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 19, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 19, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Bianca Siegl, Long Range & Mobility Planning Manager) (Georgia
More informationTOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION Building and Planning Committee Issue Briefing. Prepared By: Robert Duncan, Assistant Township Manager
Page 1 of 11 TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION Building and Planning Committee Issue Briefing Topic: Noise Ordinance Amendments Prepared By: Robert Duncan, Assistant Township Manager Date: April 6, 2016 I. Action
More informationRECOMMENDATION APPROVED; RESOLUTION AND ORDER ADOPTED; BY THE BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS. August 23, vuuw
RECOMMENDATION APPROVED; RESOLUTION 18-8334 AND ORDER 18-7243 ADOPTED; BY THE BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS August 23, 2018 LA THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES vuuw Executive Director's AMBER M. KLESGES BOARD SECRETARY
More informationORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS
ORDINANCE NO. 13-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DEBARY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF DEBARY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 SECTION 1-3 CONCERNING HEDGE DEFINITION; CHAPTER 2 SECTION 2-5 CONCERNING
More information-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION III OF TITLE 20 MENDOCINO TOWN ZONING CODE
CHAPTER 20.720 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REGULATIONS Sec. 20.720.005 Purpose. Sec. 20.720.010 Applicability. Sec. 20.720.015 Permit Requirements. Sec. 20.720.020 Exemptions. Sec. 20.720.025 Application
More informationCOUNTY OF HAWAI I PLANNING DEPARTMENT RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. RULE 23. SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS (V draft) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
COUNTY OF HAWAI I PLANNING DEPARTMENT RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULE 23. SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS (V0.3-1.25.19 draft) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 23-1 Authority Pursuant to the authority conferred
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into as of February 27, 2014 by and between Plaintiff/Petitioner
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into as of February 27, 2014 by and between Plaintiff/Petitioner BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION BAY AREA and Defendants/Respondents
More informationTable of Contents. Title 1: Administration. Table of Contents. gwinnettcounty Unified Development Ordinance Updated July 2015
Title 1: Administration Chapter 100. General Provisions. Section 100-10. Title. 1 Section 100-20. Purpose. 1 Section 100-30. Authority. 2 Section 100-40. Jurisdiction. 2 Section 100-50. Application of
More informationTown of Apple Valley Home Occupation Permit/ Cottage Food Operations
Town of Apple Valley Home Occupation Permit/ Cottage Food Operations Please type or print legibly in ink Application Processing Fee: $86 FOR TOWN USE ONLY Date Submitted: Case No. Received by: Planning
More informationVACATION REQUEST - VAC- E Council File No Melrose Place (Portion of Northerly Side) between Croft Avenue and Orlando Avenue
Office of the City Engineer Los Angeles, California To the Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee Of the Honorable Council Of the City of Los Angeles March 15, 2018 Honorable Members: SUBJECT: VACATION
More informationThe following signs shall be permitted in all business and industrial districts:
1405. Signs Authorized in Business and Industrial Districts. The following signs shall be permitted in all business and industrial districts: A. Temporary special event signs. Temporary special event signs,
More informationAPPLICATION FOR OFF-PREMISE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DEVICE PERMIT
RW-745 (2-17) www.dot.state.pa.us APPLICATION FOR OFF-PREMISE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DEVICE PERMIT (Instructions for completion of this application and related information is available as Form RW-745I) The
More informationTITLE 9 CHAPTER 9A UNIFORM STREET NAMING AND ADDRESS NUMBERING SYSTEM
9-9A-1 9-9A-2 TITLE 9 CHAPTER 9A UNIFORM STREET NAMING AND ADDRESS NUMBERING SYSTEM SECTION: 9-9A-1: 9-9A-2: 9-9A-3: 9-9A-4: 9-9A-5: 9-9A-6: 9-9A-7: 9-9A-8: 9-9A-9: 9-9A-10: 9-9A-11: Authority, Purpose
More informationPIKE TOWNSHIP, OHIO July 6, 2010 ZONING REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 6 - SIGN AND BILLBOARD REGULATIONS Section A - Permitted Signs for Which No Certificate is Required The following signs shall be permitted in the unincorporated area of Pike Township that is subject
More informationThe next regular meeting of the Central Los Angeles Area Planning Commission will be held at 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at:
CENTRAL LOS ANGELES AREA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2018, AFTER 4:30 P.M. CITY HALL, 10 TH FLOOR 200 NORTH SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Jennifer Chung Kim, President
More informationPLANNING AND LAND USE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND LAND USE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Meeting Date: October 17, 2017 Meeting Time: 6:30pm Meeting Location: City National Plaza Underground Food Court 505 S. Flower St. Suite B530 Los Angeles,
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 5, 2007 DATE: April 23, 2007 SUBJECT: SP #231 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for a Flea Market; premises known as 1400 North Courthouse Road. (RPC
More information