SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Transcription

1 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE County Government Center Rooms 161/ Monterey Street Wednesday, February 7, 2007 San Luis Obispo 1:30 p.m. 1. Introductions and determination of a quorum 2. Approval of December meeting minutes 3. Public Comment 4. Member Reports 5. Ongoing Updates: a. Groundwater Banking Sub-Committee Next Meeting March 1, 2007 b. SLO County Ocean Disposal Alternative/Central Valley Selenium Project Update c. Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) Interagency Efforts Membership Committee Dry Year Reserve Program (Excess Allocation Policies attached) Capacity Analyses Subcontractor Meeting held January 24, 2007 (agenda attached) CCWA Suspended Water 6. Resource Management System 7. Santa Margarita Ranch EIR Water Resources Considerations 8. Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program 9. WRAC Membership and By-Laws 10. Future Agenda Items --- Adjourn by 3:00 PM; 3:30PM at the latest --- Next Meeting: March 7, :30 pm City/County Library Community Room 995 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo Visit Water Resources on the Web at: Purpose of the Committee: To advise the County Board of Supervisors concerning all policy decisions relating to the water resources of the SLO County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. To recommend to the Board specific water resource programs. To recommend methods of financing water resource programs. Excerpts from WRAC By-Laws dated 199

2 WATER RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2007* Organization Representative Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul** Aug* * Sep Oct Nov Dec Atascadero Mutual Ken Weathers M John Neil A Golden State Water Henric Szopinski M Warren Morgan A Ca Mens Colony John Kellerman M X Gerald Elwood A Cambria CSD Bryan Bode M Jim Adams A Camp SLO Chris Wide M 0 A City of Arroyo Grande* Joe Costello M Ed Arnold A Jim Guthrie NA X Chuck Fellows NM City of Atascadero* Jerry Clay M Wade McKinney A George Luna NM X City of Grover Beach* Chuck Ashton M Larry Versaw A John Shoals NM Steve Lieberman NA City of Morro Bay Betty Winholtz M X Bill Boucher A City of Paso Robles Brad Hagemann M 0 A City of Pismo Beach* Bill Rabenaldt M Dennis Delzeit A Kris Vardas NM City of San Luis Obispo* Christine Mulholland M X Allen Settle A Andrew Carter NA Ron Munds Staff Gary Henderson Staff X County Farm Bureau Joy Fitzhugh M X Jackie Crabb A Cuesta College Edralin Maduli M Terry Reece A District 1 Steve Sinton M District 2 Hal Fones M X District 2* Bill Garfinkel NM District 3 Robert Mires M X District 4 Michael Winn M X District 5 Dan O'Grady M X Environmental at Large* Bill Bianchi M X David Chipping NA Environmental at Large* Eric Greening M X Sue Luft NA Heritage Ranch CSD John D'Ornellas M Debbie Fransen A Los Osos CSD Steve Senet M X John Fouche A TBD NA George Milanes Staff X Margret Falkner Staff Nipomo CSD Ed Eby M X Bruce Buel A X Bruce Buel NM Ed Eby NA Oceano CSD Rick Searcy M Francis Cooney A X San Luis Coastal RCD Linda Chipping M X Kathie Matsuyama A Templeton CSD William Van Orden M Laurie Ion A Upper Salinas RCD Tom Mora M Chuck Pritchard A Agriculture at Large* Ray Allen M X Mike Broadhurst A Development at Large* Jeff Edwards NM 0 NA Public Works Staff Courtney Howard Staff X Paavo Ogren Staff X Mark Hutchinson Staff X Sylas Cranor Staff X Planning Staff James Caruso Staff X Jeff Oliveria Staff Staff Env. Health Staff Laurie Salo Staff Staff Ag. Staff Michael Isensee Staff X GUESTS G&G Taylor Public X Dennis Gibbs Snta Brbra Cnty Wtr X M= Member; A= Alternate; NM=New Member NA= New Alternate 0 = No appointment received as of 2/1/07 * New Membership to be confirmed at BOS Meeting **No Meeting Scheduled

3 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes January 10, 2007 Approximately 1:35 pm; Chairman Winn called the meeting to Order 1) Introductions of Members and Attendees Quorum Established 2) Approval of October 2006 Meeting Minutes Upon motion by Member Mulholland, second by Member Winholtz, and vocal vote, minutes of the December 6, 2006 meeting of the Water Resource Advisory Committee (WRAC) were approved as submitted. 3) Public Comment Member Greening asks about the timing for the Resource Management System (RMS) on the January 23, 2007 Board of Supervisors meeting agenda and the impact of the action taken by Supervisor Chairman Lenthall to include a 2:00 pm Los Osos Wastewater Project update at every Board meeting on the length of those meetings. Public Works Deputy Director Paavo Ogren explains that the Los Osos Wastewater Project will have 30 minutes, starting at 2 pm, allocated at every Board meeting for a brief staff update and public comment, plus the time for staff agenda items as they are scheduled; no items will be placed on the consent agenda. The timing for the RMS was unknown. 4) Member Reports - Chairman Winn informs the WRAC that the Santa Clara Superior Court s final decision on the Santa Maria Groundwater Basin being posted on their website 5) Ongoing Updates a. Groundwater Banking Subcommittee: Courtney Howard, SLO County Public Works, informs the WRAC that the Subcommittee met on January 7, 2007 and heard a presentation from the Paso Basin Feasibility Study Consultant on their response to comments on the Preliminary Engineering Technical Memorandum. The next Subcommittee meeting is tentatively scheduled for March 1, 2007 from 5:00 to 6:30 pm at the Templeton Community Services District, when the Consultant will be back to present the initial alternatives for coarse screening. b. Membership and By-Laws Update: Courtney Howard, SLO County Public Works, informs the WRAC that the membership and By-Laws will be taken to the Board for approval on January 23, 2007 and provides a hand-out on the proposed membership changes. Discussion ensues regarding the District 2 representative and Member Fones confirms that Supervisor Gibson asked him to continue for now. Ms. Howard notes that the environmental-at-large and agricultural-at-large alternate positions have new applicants to be considered for appointment by the Board. c. SLO County Ocean Disposal Alternative/Central Valley Selenium Project Update: Mark Hutchinson, SLO County Public Works, summarizes staff s WRAC 2/7/07 Minutes 3

4 conversation with the Bureau of Reclamation including their indication that there is no new information, that they still must issue the final record of decision in mid-february in accordance with a court-order, and that they would get back to County staff on whether or not the meetings were public. Discussion ensues on how to find out if the meetings are public; the timing of legal or other action by the Board after the final record of decision is issued; disseminating information on the issue at the federal level. County Staff indicates that they will follow up with the Ferguson Group, lobbyist group for the County. d. Santa Margarita Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR): James Caruso, SLO County Planning, announces that the EIR will be released for public comment on January 11, 2007 and that a meeting will be held in Santa Margarita on January 11, 2007 at 7 pm. Copies will be available at (pdf), libraries (hard copy), and the Planning Department (CDs). Discussion ensues regarding WRAC review of the water aspects of the EIR at the February meeting. 6) Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) Executive Board Membership Evaluation Subcommittee Identify Participants: Chairman Winn and Member Greening discuss the need to evaluate membership on CCWA, and Public Works Deputy Director Paavo Ogren summarizes discussions and activities with the State Water Subcontractors and CCWA. Discussion ensues regarding the membership in relation to the excess allocation, State Water Subcontractors and governance issues related to the idea of groundwater banking. Bill Bianchi, Mitch Cooney, Eric Greening, Betty Winholtz (or Bill Boucher in her absence), Steve Senet, Bruce Buel, Dennis Delzeit, Brad Hagemann, and Mike Winn are all identified as members of the subcommittee. Upon motion by Alternate Member Buel, second by Member Mulholland and vocal vote, the identified members are unanimously approved for the CCWA Executive Board Membership Evaluation Subcommittee. 7) Consider recommending that the Board of Supervisors recommend to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) that videotaping of the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) meetings be included in its annual budget: Member Greening speaks to the absence of a budget item for videotaping the CCRWQCB, that the SWRCB sets the CCRWQCB budget, and the importance of public education regarding water issues. Member Bianchi moves to recommend that the County Board of Supervisors send a letter to the SWRCB requesting that a budget item be included for the videotaping of the CCRWQCB meetings. Discussion ensues regarding including recommending broadcasting funds in the budget item, CCRWQCB s indication that they would support the Board s recommendation letter, emphasis in the letter of the importance of public education, and interim videotaping and broadcasting. Upon second by Member Allen, and unanimous vocal vote, the amended motion to recommend that the County Board of Supervisors send a letter to the SWRCB requesting that a budget item be included for the videotaping and broadcasting of the CCRWQCB meetings, with the intent that the letter to the Board be executed by the WRAC Chairperson with Public Works Staff assistance, was approved. WRAC 2/7/07 Minutes 4

5 8) Appointment of WRAC Liaison(s) to the Transferable Development Credit (TDC) Blue Ribbon Committee: Chairman Winn explains that the Board decided to have the existing TDC Blue Ribbon Committee evaluate the Rural Planned Development Ordinance, the TCC Blue Ribbon Committee does not have a water resources expert as a member, the Board was not willing to change the membership to accommodate the WRAC s recommendation but recommended that the WRAC send a liaison to the Committee meetings. Discussion ensues regarding the timing of meetings and coverage by potential WRAC liaisons. Member Winholtz moves that the WRAC Chairperson be appointed as liaison to the TDC Blue Ribbon Committee, which is seconded by Member Mulholland with the amendment to include that Member Greening or other alternates attend in the Chairperson s absence. Upon clarification that the liaison would not be a voting member of the Committee and vocal vote, the motion carries unanimously. 9) Los Osos Resource Capacity Study (RCS): James Caruso, SLO County Planning, summarizes the intent and content of the Los Osos Resource Capacity Study including the ability of the Board of Supervisors to certify a Level of Severity III upon its completion, understanding that there are recommendations in the RCS but entities other than the County decide whether to implement them, availability of good information from the Los Osos CSD and Cleath and Associates, addressing the resource capacity issues by increasing supply (i.e. importing water) and extending the capacity of the resource (i.e. conservation, retrofit program), the determination that the Los Osos groundwater basin is in overdraft, and recent actions by water agencies to address problems with overdrafting. Discussion ensues on implementing a retrofit program and other conservation measures, prohibition of subdivisions resulting in a net increase of non-agricultural draw on the basin, uncertainty of the wastewater being available for recharge/reclaim. Mr. Caruso further explains that the County will not be implementing a moratorium on development for lack of a resource that is not managed by the County, even though legally the County could. Discussion ensues regarding County police powers, Coastal Commission involvement, current litigation regarding the Los Osos Groundwater Basin, growth trends in Los Osos, the purpose and sufficiency of the RCS, and changes in water purveyor operations to supplement existing water supplies. Consensus is reached to review the final draft of the RCS in terms of the determination in level of severity and the actual recommendations included, and act at the March WRAC meeting. 10) Countywide Master Water Plan Outline and Identification of Resources: Deferred 11) Election of 2007 WRAC Officers: Member Mulholland nominates Member Mike Winn to be the 2007 WRAC Chairperson, and the nomination is seconded by Member Bianchi. Member Allen moves to close nominations, and upon unanimous vocal vote, Member Mike Winn is elected 2007 WRAC Chairperson. Member Mulholland nominates Member Eric Greening as 2007 WRAC Vice-Chairperson, and the nomination is seconded by Member Guthrie. Upon motion by Member Allen to close nominations, Member Greening is elected 2007 WRAC Vice-Chairperson by unanimous vocal vote. Meeting adjourned approx. 2:57 pm WRAC 2/7/07 Minutes 5

6 Excess Entitlement - Definition State Water Project Proposed Excess Entitlement Policies January 2003 The District State Water Project Excess Entitlement is the portion of the District s total entitlement that is not contracted to others for their deliverable or drought buffer uses. Priority of Use 1. Prior to transferring the excess entitlement for any other use, contractors of state water entitlement with capacity in Phase II of the Coastal Aqueduct shall have the first right to utilize the excess entitlement for drought buffer (reliability) purposes under the terms of a drought buffer agreement. 2. Preference shall be given to local agencies and water purveyors regardless of whether a transfer is on an annual, multi-year, or a permanent basis. 3. No permanent transfer of the excess entitlement for use outside District boundaries shall be made prior to a final update of the District s Master Water Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors, and then only if the transfer is consistent with the then adopted Master Plan. (See Note below) 4. No multi-year transfer for use outside District boundaries shall be made with a term in excess of five years prior to a final update to the District s Master Water Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors, and then out of District transfers can only take place if the transfer is consistent with the adopted Master Plan. 5. On any out -of-district transfer, preference shall be given to those that provide: a) revenues that recover current costs and some or all of the District s past costs, b) maintain the District s right to use the water in the future, or c) which are used for environmental mitigation. 6. The Public Works Director is authorized to determine the annual amount of the excess entitlement to transfer to the State Water Project Turnback Pools established under the existing terms of State Water Agreements. In making that determination, the Public Works Director shall first consider local needs and how the use of the Turnback Pool might impact other potential transfers. Note: These policies were adopted by the Board of Supervisors with the understanding there will be no permanent sales outside the District. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #5.c 6

7 State Water Project Subcontractors DATE: January 24, 2007 TIME: 2:00 4:00 PM LOCATION: Community Conference Room, New County Government Center, San Luis Obispo Agenda 1. Operation Update Reclassification of Article 21 Water/utilization options Turnback pools A and B: February and March Bond Measures/IRWM Water Supply/Quality Projects Grant Opportunities District Process Prop 1E: Monies for fixing delta, levees, and improving reliability Prop 84: Monies for IRWM and Water Quality Projects 3. CCWA Membership WRAC Subcommittee Previous Board Actions 4. Groundwater Banking Plan Status Process Objectives 5. State Water Excess Allocation Flow Tests/Capacity Study CCWA/SLOCFC&WCD Contract Los Osos and other requests Response to Requests Master Water Plan Short term options (Yearly Option Agreement) 6. Proposed change of annual shutdown Shutdown impact on Morro Bay and Guadalupe in November 2006 No emergency State Water available for 2007 shutdown WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #5.c 7

8 TO: FROM: VIA: Water Resources Advisory Committee Courtney Howard, Water Resources Engineer Paavo Ogren, Deputy Director of Public Works DATE: February 7, 2007 SUBJECT: Agenda Item #6: Resource Management System Recommendation Review Board of Supervisor actions from January 23, 2007 Resource Management System (RMS) hearing. Discussion On January 23, 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved the staff recommendations in the Annual Resource Summary Report for the RMS, with an amendment to designate a LOS I for the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin and complete a Resource Capacity Study. Additionally: The Board directed County staff to review and update the Nipomo Resource Capacity Study and bring the item back to the Board mid-year (120 day estimate) for a certification of LOS III hearing, after first reviewing the item with the WRAC and Planning Commission. The Board actions in December of 2005 and May of 2006 are attached for review. The Board directed County Staff to review the "Hwy 46 Corridor / Jardine Area" issue and to bring the item back to the Board mid-year (90 day estimate) with recommendations on how to complete a Resource Capacity Study, including timing, funding and staffing considerations. The Los Osos Resource Capacity Study is being presented to the Planning Commission on February 22, The LOS III certification hearing is scheduled for the March 27, 2007 Board meeting. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #6 8

9 December 20, 2005: Hearing to consider the Resource Management System (RMS) Annual Resource Summary Report Matter is fully discussed and thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Achadjian, seconded by Supervisor Lenthall and unanimously carried, the Board adds to the staff letter on Page C-6-3, under Roads: Halcyon Road - between its intersections with Highway 1"; the language in Mr. Hand s memorandum to the Board dated December 20, 2005 regarding the requested language by representatives of the Woodlands project, be replaced with the language as follows: The Woodlands Village Specific Plan and certification of its 20 year water supply have been approved by the Board of Supervisors through separate water verification under State Law. Any change to water supply level of severity for the Nipomo Mesa area do not apply to the Woodlands Specific Plan area. ; that the Annual Resource Summary Report should include a recommendation for Level of Severity III for water supply in the Nipomo Mesa area and that the Recommended Actions be amended to include additional actions as follows: 1) at this time, a building moratorium is not considered an appropriate action for the Nipomo Mesa area. The Board of Supervisors has specified other appropriate actions that are currently in the implementation process; 2) Complete the processing of planning area standards that would require new development to incorporate specific water conservation features and make the provision of supplemental water a condition of general plan amendments. Direct staff to return with an amendment to reduce the Level of Severity at such time as those planning area standards become effective; 3) Environmental determinations for development proposals on the Nipomo Mesa will continue to be made on a case by case basis, do not require environmental impact reports for projects that would not otherwise be required to prepare an environmental impact report. Mitigation measures and project amendments may be available to lessen or avoid Class I water impacts in some circumstances, approved. Chairperson Bianchi amends her motion to approve a Level of Severity III for the Los Osos area and a Resource Capacity Study be done, with Supervisor Patterson concurring and thereafter, on motion, seconded and unanimously carried the Board approves a Level of Severity III for the Los Osos area and a Resource Capacity Study be done. Thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Ovitt, seconded by Supervisor Achadjian and unanimously carried, the Board approves the 2005 Annual Resource Summary Report as amended and directs staff to continue implementation of the ongoing RMS programs and to initiate work on new approved programs. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #6 9

10 May 9, 2006: Hearing to consider amendments to Title 26, the County s Growth Management Ordinance, Title 19, the Building and Construction Ordinance and Title 22, the County Land Use Ordinance A motion by Supervisor Ovitt, seconded by Supervisor Bianchi, to tentatively approve the amendment for LRP (Title 22) as presented with a review of the fees charged and the Woodlands language, is discussed. Matter is discussed and thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Ovitt, seconded by Supervisor Bianchi and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Ovitt, Bianchi, Lenthall, Patterson, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: None the Board tentatively approves LRP , amending Titles 19 & 22 as recommended by the Planning Commission, with the following proposed changes: (1) to the Woodlands Specific Plan, (2) the NCSD s involvement in Fee Structure dealing with land division and the General Plan, (3) requiring every structure to pay toward supplemental water and (4) the minor corrections made by staff, and staff is directed to bring back language for this changes and said hearing is continued to May 23, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. Thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Ovitt, seconded by Supervisor Bianchi and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Ovitt, Bianchi, Lenthall, Patterson, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: None the Board tentatively approves the language for LRP as outlined in the staff report dated May 9, 2006, with the following changes: SECTION 3 Page C-6-43(1)Maximum number of new dwelling units allowed in the Nipomo Mesa area. The maximum number of new dwelling units allowed in the Nipomo Mesa area (see Figure 1) for the period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007, shall not exceed a 1.8 percent annual increase in the number of existing dwelling units in 2005, resulting in the potential for a Maximum Annual Allocation of 127 new residences in the Nipomo Mesa area for the period from July 1, 2006 through June 30, In addition to the 1.8 percent annual allotment, a.5 percent supplement of allotments resulting in the potential for an additional 35 new residences in the Nipomo Mesa area shall be made available for the period from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007 to projects on the waiting list located within urban or village reserve lines that have received intent-to-serve letters from the applicable water district and are either located within, and meet the standards of, the Olde Towne Nipomo Design Plan and meet identified criteria as Smart Growth, Senior Housing, Mixed Use, Green Build (equivalent to LEED certified) or other projects that will result in the completion of construction of WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #6 10

11 sections of road improvements identified on the South County Circulation Study Road Improvement list; and, SECTION 9 - Page C (3) 20% of the total annual allotment in the Nipomo Mesa Area for multi-family/planned development projects that have received intent to serve letters from the applicable water district and meet any one of the following: (i) Projects that meet criteria as a Smart Growth, Senior Housing, Mixed Use, Green Build (equivalent to LEED certified); or (ii)projects that guarantee long term affordability for at least 35% of the units in accordance with County Ordinance; or (iii) Projects that will result in the completion of construction of sections of road improvements identified on the South County Circulation Study Road Improvement list; and said item is continued to May 16, 2006 for staff to bring back this corrected language for reintroduction of the ordinance at that time. May 16, 2006: Continued hearing (continued from May ) on the proposed changes to the County s Growth Management Ordinance, Title 26 of the County Code, to maintain the County-wide growth rate at 2.3% and the Nipomo Mesa Area rate at 1.8% and set the Cambria growth rate at 0%. Matter is fully discussed and thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Ovitt, seconded by Supervisor Bianchi and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Ovitt, Bianchi, Lenthall, Patterson, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: None the Board amends Section 3 of the proposed ordinance as follows: in (1) the third sentence shall read: In addition to the 1.8 percent annual allotment, up to 35 additional units shall be made available from previous years unused allotments in the Nipomo Mesa area for the period from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007 to multifamily/planned development projects on the waiting list located within the urban or village reserve lines that have received intent-to-serve letters from the applicable water district and are either: in subsection (a) shall read as follows: Projects that are located within and meet the standards of the Olde Town Nipomo Design and Circulation Plan are and meet identified criteria as Smart Growth, Senior Housing, Mixed Use, Green Build (equivalent to LEED certified); or; ; subsection (b) is amended to read as follows: Projects that will result in the completion of construction of sections of road improvements identified on the South County Circulation Study Road Improvement list or will result in construction of road improvements where such construction will materially improve traffic and circulation on existing or proposed roads.. under Section 9 f (i) is amended to read: Projects that meet criteria as a are Smart Growth, Senior Housing, Mixed Use, Green Build (equivalent to LEED certified) and are located within, and meet the standards of the Olde Towne Nipomo Design and Circulation Plan; or ; (iii) is amended to read: Project that will result in the completion of construction of sections of road improvements identified on the South County Circulation Study Road Improvement list or will result in construction of road improvements where such construction will WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #6 11

12 materially improve traffic and circulation on existing or proposed roads. ; introduces an ordinance amending Title 26 of the San Luis Obispo County Code, the Growth Management Ordinance as amended and continues the hearing to May 23, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. May 23, 2006: Continued hearing to consider adoption of resolutions to take final action on all the amendments tentatively recommended for approval on May 9, 16, 23, 2006 Amendments to the Land Use Element (South County Area Plan), Title 19 (Building and Construction Ordinance), Title 22 (Land Use Ordinance), and Title 26 (Growth Management Ordinance) Summer General Plan Amendment Cycle 2006; All Districts. (At the beginning of the meeting this item was amended to replace pages listed under Exhibit LRP :1 (pages 23-27) these changes reflect action taken by the Board on May 16, 2006.) Matter is discussed and thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Patterson, seconded by Supervisor Ovitt and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Patterson, Ovitt, Lenthall, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Bianchi RESOLUTION NO , resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Luis Obispo approving the carry over of 10% of the maximum allotment from the previous year to make those unused allotments available for distribution in the Fiscal Year 06-07, resulting in an additional 110 units Countywide with none of these units available in the Nipomo Mesa Area or the Community of Cambria, adopted. Thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Patterson, seconded by Supervisor Ovitt and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Patterson, Ovitt, Lenthall, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Bianchi RESOLUTION NO , resolution to amend the San Luis Obispo County General Plan, Land Use Element (South County Area Plan), the Building and Construction Ordinance, Title 19 of the County Code, the Land Use Ordinance, Title 22 of the County and the Growth Management Ordinance, Title 26 of the County Code and to adopt ordinances entitled an ordinance amending Title 19 of the San Luis Obispo County Code, the Building and Construction Ordinance, by amending Section relating to the Water Conservation on the Nipomo Mesa, an ordinance amending Title 22 of the San Luis Obispo County Code, the Land Use Ordinance, Section relating to the Nipomo Mesa Water Conservation Area, an ordinance amending Title 26 of the San Luis Obispo County Code, the Growth Management Ordinance and an ordinance amending specific sections of the San Luis Obispo County Land Use Ordinance, WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #6 12

13 Title 22 of the County Code and to approve environmental documents, adopted as amended. Thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Patterson, seconded by Supervisor Ovitt and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Patterson, Ovitt, Lenthall, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Bianchi the reading of the proposed ordinance is waived and said proposed ordinance is read by title only and ORDINANCE NO. 3089, an ordinance amending Title 19 of the San Luis Obispo County Code, the Building and Construction Ordinance, by amending Section relating to the Water Conservation on the Nipomo Mesa, adopted. Thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Patterson, seconded by Supervisor Ovitt and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Patterson, Ovitt, Lenthall, Chairperson Achadjian NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Bianchi the reading of the proposed ordinance is waived and said proposed ordinance is read by title only and ORDINANCE NO. 3090, an ordinance amending Title 22 of the San Luis Obispo County Code, the Land Use Ordinance, Section relating to the Nipomo Mesa Water Conservation Area, adopted. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #6 13

14 TO: FROM: VIA: Water Resources Advisory Committee Jeff Werst, Senior Engineer, Hydraulic Planning Unit Paavo Ogren, Deputy Director of Public Works DATE: February 7, 2007 SUBJECT: Agenda Item #7: Santa Margarita Ranch EIR Water Resources Considerations for CSA 23 Discussion The purpose of this staff report is to provide a brief informational update of the status of the Draft EIR for the Santa Margarita Ranch Agricultural Residential Cluster Subdivision Project and potential water resources and infrastructure impacts for the community of Santa Margarita. Draft EIR Status. The draft EIR for the Santa Margarita Ranch was presented at a public meeting held on January 11, 2007 at the Santa Margarita Community Center. The community meeting coincided with the commencement of the 60-day public comment period, which has since been extended to 90 days. Comments are due back to the SLO County planning Department (James Caruso, jcaruso@co.slo.ca.us) by April 12, The draft EIR addresses the environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed development of a 112 lot agricultural cluster subdivision, as well as future development scenarios on the Ranch. The document is available on the Planning Department s website at Water Resources Considerations for CSA 23. County Service Area 23 (CSA 23) currently serves approximately 484 residential, 22 commercial and 6 public authority metered customers in Santa Margarita. All of the water demand for CSA 23 is met by shallow alluvial and deeper fractured rock aquifers underlying the community. The safe yield of the currently developed ground water supplies has been estimated to be approximately 200 acre-feet per year (AFY). According to projections by Public Works staff, an additional 90 AFY of yield is needed to reliably serve existing customers as well as to serve buildable lots within the CSA 23 service area boundary. Due to concerns about water rights, safe yield, water quality and operational issues, Public Works staff considers the existing groundwater resources for the community to be vulnerable, and has therefore shared the community s interest in the release of the draft EIR. We have participated in review and comment on the Administrative Draft and we are participating in the review of the Draft EIR with the CSA 23 Advisory Group. While the Public Works Department does not take an official stance on the overall land use issues of the Santa Margarita Ranch project, if the project is approved, the Department would advocate implementing mutually beneficial water resource programs and improvements. Such improvements might include an emergency or operational inter-tie between the water distribution systems for the two communities, shared water storage facilities, and/or shared acquisition of supplemental water. These scenarios have been presented for discussion by staff at numerous previous meetings of the CSA 23 Advisory Group and with representatives of the Ranch. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #7 14

15 TO: FROM: VIA: Water Resources Advisory Committee Courtney Howard, Water Resources Engineer Paavo Ogren, Deputy Director of Public Works DATE: February 7, 2007 SUBJECT: Agenda Item #8: Integrated Regional Water Management Program Recommendation 1. Send letters and/or s to State officials regarding their proposed changes to the Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Program grant award process. 2. Submit projects for consideration under the IRWM Program Discussion Proposition 50 During the Los Osos item (2:05 pm) at the February 6, 2007 Board of Supervisors meeting, staff will be requesting that the Chairman of the Board send a letter to State officials regarding proposed changes to the IRWM grant award process. On July 14, 2005, applications were filed for IRWM implementation grant funding as a part of the first step (Step 1) of the first funding cycle (Round 1) under Proposition 50 for the following four projects: 1. Los Osos Wastewater Treatment Facility Project 2. Nacimiento Water Supply Project 3. Lake Nacimiento Watershed Mercury Sediment Reduction Project 4. Nipomo Supplemental Water Supply Project The attached spreadsheet demonstrates the DWR and SWRCB ranking of the applications, and indicates the sixteen (16) applications that were invited to final selection in Round #1 funding. DWR is now proposing to award all sixteen (16) applicants grant funding available under Proposition 50 rather than having a second competitive funding cycle (Round 2) as was previously established under the IRWM program planned. In essence, DWR is now proposing to significantly deviate from their established program guidelines. The letter from the Chairman of the Board to DWR, the SWRCB, Assemblyman Sam Blakeslee, and Senator Abel Maldonado is recommended to oppose the proposed change to the award process since: The District has been acting in good faith under the process that was established. Applications that scored lower than the District s application are included in the 16 proposed to be funded. The District would be excluded from competing for Proposition 50 grant funding that would significantly benefit critical projects. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #8 15

16 Proposition 84/1E $52 Million has been allocated to the Central Coast Region for safe drinking water and water quality projects that meet requirements outlined in Chapter 2 of Proposition 84. The Central Coast Region consists of Santa Cruz, San Benito, Monterey, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties, and the grant award process will be administered by DWR through the IRWM program. Additionally, Proposition 1E has $300 Million designated for grants for stormwater flood management projects that meet all of the following requirements: (a) Have a nonstate cost share of not less than 50 percent. (b) Are not part of the State Plan of Flood Control. (c) Are designed to manage stormwater runoff to reduce flood damage and where feasible, provide other benefits, including groundwater recharge, water quality improvement, and ecosystem restoration. (d) Comply with applicable regional water quality control plans. (e) Are consistent with any applicable integrated regional water management plan. Staff is requesting that agencies submit projects they consider to meet the requirements as listed in Propositions 50, 84 and 1E to the District for consideration in the update to our IRWM Plan. Staff is currently coordinating with the other entities in the Central Coast Region that have adopted IRWM Plans in order to ensure that an equitable mechanism for distributing the $52 Million designated to the Region is established. It is critical for the District to identify high priority projects and update the IRWM Plan in a timely fashion in order to be in a good position to compete for grant funds. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #8 16

17 Michael Winn Eric Greening Paavo Ogren Chairperson Vice Chairperson Secretary Room 207, County Government Center San Luis Obispo CA PH (805) FAX (805) Members Steve Sinton District 1 Harold Fones District 2 Michael Winn District 4 Dan O'Grady District 5 Joe Costello Arroyo Grande Jerry Clay Atascadero Chuck Ashton Grover Beach Betty Winholtz Morro Bay Brad Hagemann Paso Robles Bill Rabenaldt Pismo Beach Christine Mulholland San Luis Obispo Ken Weathers Atascadero MWC Henric Szopinski Golden State Water Co. Bryan Bode Cambria CSD John D Ornellas Heritage Ranch CSD Steve Senet Los Osos CSD Ed Eby Nipomo CSD Richard Searcy Oceano CSD Bill VanOrden Templeton CSD Linda Chipping Coastal RCD Tom Mora Upper Salinas RCD Chris Wide Camp San Luis Obispo Joy Fitzhugh County Farm Bureau Edralin Maduli Cuesta College John Kellerman CA Men s Colony Bill Bianchi Environmental-at-Large Eric Greening Environmental-at-Large Ray Allen Agriculture-at-Large February 7, 2007 Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District County Government Center, Room D430 San Luis Obispo CA Subject: Dear Supervisors: Letter Reflecting San Luis Obispo County Water Resource Advisory Committee Opposition to the Proposed Modifications in Proposition 50 Grant Allocations The purpose of this letter is to express opposition to the proposed changes in Proposition 50 grant allocations. As we understand the proposal, Round Two (2) of the Implementation Grant funding, originally intended to allocate $220 million to local agencies, is being reduced to zero. The San Luis Obispo County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC) strongly opposes such a change in allocation plans since it excludes the County from competing for Proposition 50 grants on behalf of the 24 agencies and organizations of the WRAC. Appointees of the WRAC include elected officials, water resource professionals, and agricultural and environmental stakeholders. For over 50 years, WRAC hearings have been the primary forum for the regional review of water resource issues and details. WRAC s many purposes include developing recommendations to the County s Board - thereby making WRAC the most obvious stakeholder group for Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) planning. The WRAC developed an IRWM subcommittee with representatives of municipalities, private water purveyors, agricultural and environmental stakeholders. Public workshops were then conducted to review IRWM plan objectives and strategies, identify and review IRWM projects, and review and recommend project prioritization. WRAC s recommendations were submitted to the County s Board, and approved on May 3, 2005 along with direction for County to submit the IRWM Plan and grant applications for the prioritized projects recommended by the WRAC. The proposed elimination of Round Two (2) of Proposition 50 Implementation grants, however, excludes the County from competing for Proposition 50 grants for projects deemed to be of high priority by the WRAC. Purpose of the Committee: To advise the County Board of Supervisors concerning all policy decisions relating to the water resources of the SLO County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. To recommend to the Board specific water resource programs. To recommend methods of financing water resource programs. Excerpts from WRAC By-Laws dated 2005

18 In addition, your attention to this letter should also note the attached ranking of the original Proposition 50 Implementation grant applications for Round One (1). The evaluation prepared by staff of the Department of Water Resources and the State Water Board clearly indicate that the Round One (1) Implementation Grant application for San Luis Obispo County outscored several other applications but was excluded from further consideration while the lower scoring applications were allowed to continue and obtain funding. From the evidence before us, the IRWM ranking criteria and funding decisions do not reflect the IRWM guidelines and create serious questions regarding the overall credibility of a water resource program that intended to improve collaboration and integration of numerous water resource goals and objectives. Consequently, we request that Round Two (2) of $220 million in Implementation Grant funding is allocated based on a competitive application process as currently established in IRWM guidelines. Respectfully, MICHAEL WINN Chair, San Luis Obispo County Water Resources Advisory Committee c: Roger Briggs, CCRWQCB Lester Snow, Director, DWR Acting Executive Director, SWRCB Tracie Billington, IRWM Program, DWR Shahla Farahnak, IRWM Program, SWRCB

19 Summary of Step 1 - Ranking of Scores and Statewide Priorities Statewide Priorities PIN Applicant_Name Score Consolidated Score Score Ranking Reduce Conflict Resolve Water Rights Disputes Implement TMDL Implement Watershed Management Initatives Implement NPS Plan Assist in meeting Delta WQ Objectives Implement Various State Plans Address EJ Concerns Assist in Achieving Calfed Goals Overall Priority Ranking 5976 Mojave Water Agency 110 A Low NA High NA Low Med NA High Med 6584 Humboldt County 109 A Low High High Med ND Med High NA Med 5636 Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency 106 A High Med Med Low NA Med Med NA Med 4698 Plumas County 106 A Med NA High Md NA NA NA NA Med 5756 Yucaipa Valley Water District 99 High NA Med NA NA Low NA Low 94 A Med 6986 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 94 High Low Med Med NA Low NA Low 3998 Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County 98 A NA Med Med High NA NA NA NA Med 6984 Calleguas Municipal Water District 94 Med High High High Low Med Low Low 94 A 6462 Ventura Countywide Integrated Regional Water Management 87 Med Low Low Low NA Low Low NA Med-Low 6504 Orange County 94 A Med Med Low Med Low Med Low Med Med-Low 6398 Tahoe Resource Conservation District 93 A Low High Med Med NA Med Med NA Med 6964 Contra Costa Water District 91 A NA Low Low Low Med Med NA High Med-Low 6884 Freeport Regional Water Authority 90 High NA Med High Med Med Low High 90 A 6336 Regional Water Authority 80 Med Low Low Low Med Low Low Med Med-Low 4676 San Luis and Delta Mendota Water Authority 89 A High High Med Med High Med Low Med High-Med 3816 Monterey County Water Resources Agency 89 A High Low NA Low NA NA NA NA Med 7084 Santa Monica Bay Restoration Authority 81 High High High High NA Low NA Low 7036 West Basin Municipal Water District 78 NA High Med Med NA NA NA Med 81 B 5956 Watershed Conservation Authority 76 Med High High High Med High Med Med High-Med 7068 Los Angeles, City of 76 Med High Med High Med High High Med 6456 Alameda County Water District 88 Med NA NA NA NA NA NA Low 7092 Santa Clara Valley Water District 78 High Med Low Low Med Med NA Med 78 B 6770 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies 75 High Med Med Med Low High Low High High-Med 6624 Montara Water and Sanitary District 56 Low Low Med High Low Med Low Low 5796 Northern California Joint Exercise of Powers 71 High Med NA NA High High NA High 71 B 5816 Butte County Dept of Water & Resource Conservation 56 Low Low Med Low NA Low Low Med High 3840 San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 83 B Med Med Med Med NA NA NA NA Med 6416 Solano County Water Agency 83 B NA NA NA Low Low Low Low Med Low 6766 Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District 82 B Med Low NA NA NA NA NA NA Low 5996 Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 80 B Med Med Low Low NA Med Low Med Med-Low 6178 Madera Irrigation District 79 B Med Low NA NA NA Low NA Low Low 6136 Salton Sea Authority 77 B High High Med Med NA NA NA NA Med 6438 Santa Barbara County 76 B Low Med Low Low NA Med Low Med Med-Low 4076 San Bernardino County 74 B NA NA NA NA NA Low NA NA Low 5880 Upland, City of 73 B Low Low Med Med NA Low NA Low Med-Low 4136 San Diego County Water Authority 68 C Low Low Low Low NA Low Med Med Med-Low 6016 Stockton, City of 67 C Med High NA NA Low NA NA Med Med-Low 6156 Kings River Conservation District 61 C NA NA NA NA NA Low NA NA Low 7246 Pleasant Valley Water District 60 C NA NA Med NA Low NA NA Med Med-Low 7024 Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 60 C High Med Med Med NA High NA NA High-Med 5316 Lake County Watershed Protection District 59 C NA Low Med NA NA Low NA Med Med-Low 6646 Inyo County Water Department DQ 7040 Calexico New River Committee DQ 6804 Merced - University of California DQ 7034 Nevada Irrigation District DQ 7144 County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County DQ 6564 Lake County Special Districts DQ 6098 Shafter, City of DQ 7038 Moreno Valley, City of DQ 7042 Downey, City of DQ Proposal invited to submit Step 2 proposal Consolidated Score based on either highest score or the highest score that represents the consolidated region A = Score of 85 & above; Quality projects; Call back on merit B = Scores from 84-70; Consider degree of benefit to Statewide Priorities C = Score < 70 points; Not cosidered for call back High-Proposal with a high degree of benefit to this Statewide Priority. Med-Proposal with a moderate degree of benefit to this Statewide Priority. Low-Proposal with a low degree of benefit to this Statewide Priority. NA-Statewide Priority not addressed by applicant in Attachment 12 WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #8 19

20 TO: FROM: VIA: Water Resources Advisory Committee Courtney Howard, Water Resources Engineer Paavo Ogren, Deputy Director of Public Works DATE: February 7, 2007 SUBJECT: Agenda Item #9: WRAC Membership and By-Laws Recommendation Review and approve the approach to updating WRAC membership and By-Laws. Discussion Public Works staff recommends going to the Board of Supervisors for approval of the following items: 1. New member and alternate member agency nominations 2. Environmental-at-Large and Agriculture-at-Large member reappointments and recommended alternates 3. District 2 membership nomination 4. Modification of the By-Laws to (see attached draft of By-Laws for language): a. include changes approved at December 6, 2006 WRAC meeting b. change the reappointment of Environmental-at-Large and Agricultural-at-Large Membership to February of odd years c. add a Development-at-Large membership group Recommendations and nominations for the membership positions are included in the attached table. Staff recommends appointing the members as shown based on a review of applications received to-date (attached). In order to improve the process for taking WRAC membership appointments to the Board of Supervisors, staff recommends changing the appointment/reappointment of Environmental-at- Large and Agricultural-at-Large Membership to February of odd years in order to also receive nominations from agencies that are typically submitted by January. It is important to notify staff immediately if a change in membership is anticipated in order to properly notice the vacancy prior to Board of Supervisors approval. Staff will include an item in the February WRAC meeting agendas in order to present the recommended appointments prior to the Board of Supervisor meetings. Additionally, staff recommends including a Development at Large membership group in the By- Laws to improve WRAC diversity and breadth of representation. The development community has an active interest in water resource policies and programs considered by the County Board. It is also a constituency that expends significant funds on mitigations including reclamation and conservation programs. Inclusion of this membership will facilitate participation of interested constituents. WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 20

21 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE BYLAWS ARTICLE I Purposes of the Committee 1. To advise the County Board of Supervisors concerning all policy decisions relating to the water resources of the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The Committee shall determine the needs and financial capabilities of the District with respect to water resources and upon deliberation shall convey their recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. 2. To recommend to the Board of Supervisors specific water resource and water conservation programs with recognition of the economic and environmental values of the programs. Further, to recommend to the Board of Supervisors other programs concerning the objectives and purposes of the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act. 3. To recommend methods of financing water resource programs. ARTICLE II Members 1. Membership on the Committee shall be available to the following agencies or groups (agencies): a. Each Incorporated City b. Each Supervisorial District c. Each Water Serving Independent Special District d. Each Resource Conservation District e. Atascadero Mutual Water Company f. California Men s Colony g. Camp San Luis Obispo h. Cuesta Community College i. Golden State Water Company j. Rural Water Company k. County Farm Bureau l. Environmental At Large (2 members) m. Agriculture At Large (1 member) n. Development At Large (1 member) 2. Each agency or group may have a member and an alternate 3. Members (and alternates) for agencies shall be nominated by their agency and confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. 4. Members (and alternates) for the Supervisorial Districts shall be nominated by the Supervisor of that district and confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Such Deleted: Cal Cites Formatted: Bullets and Numbering ADOPTED JULY 19, 2005 WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 21

22 WRAC BYLAWS Page 2 of 3 representatives shall reside in, and represent their District at the pleasure of the District's supervisor. 5. The Agricultural At-Large member (and alternate) shall be selected by the Board of Supervisors from applicants engaged in production agriculture. Their terms shall be for two years, to be replaced or reaffirmed in February of odd numbered years. 6. The two Environmental At-Large members (and their alternates) shall be selected by the Board of Supervisors from applicants with a record of membership in one or more environmental groups and/or independent environmental activism. Their terms shall be for two years, to be replaced or reaffirmed in February of odd numbered years. 7. Members are required to provide an update on water resource issues relevant to their group or agency at least once per year. 8. Three successive unexcused absences of a member without notifying the Committee, if no alternate is representing the member, shall be cause for the member to be dropped from the Committee and the member s agency shall be notified and nomination of a new representative requested. 9. This Committee shall comply with all applicable laws, including the Ralph M. Brown Act. 10. Members and alternates serve at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors. Deleted: should Deleted: January Deleted: January Formatted: Bullets and Numbering ARTICLE III Meetings 1. Meetings shall be held on the first Wednesday of each month except for July and August. If a majority vote of members present in a regular meeting approve, the July and/or August meeting may be held, and any regular meeting may be postponed if it would fall on a holiday. 2. Meetings shall begin at 1:30 p.m. and shall continue for no more than two hours unless extended time is approved by a majority vote. 3. The Chairperson, or the Vice Chairperson in the Chairperson s absence, may call a Special Meeting after proper notification of the Committee members. Proper notification shall be deemed to have been met if such notification is written and is delivered personally, by mail, by with a confirmation receipt, or by direct contact by telephone at least 24 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting. 4. Meetings may be canceled by vote of the committee in a meeting. If there are insufficient items to justify a meeting it may be canceled by agreement between the Chairperson and Secretary. Notice of canceled meetings shall be the same as for special meetings. 5. Ten members, or their alternates in their absence, shall constitute a quorum. 6. Any decision or recommendation to the Board of Supervisors shall require a majority vote by Committee members present, or their alternates, for passage. Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Chairman s Deleted: Chairman ADOPTED JULY 19, 2005 WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 22

23 WRAC BYLAWS Page 3 of 3 7. Every member agency shall have one vote. This vote may be cast by the member or the alternate. 8. Meetings shall be open to the public and members of other governmental agencies. Visitors may express opinions or make requests during public comment. The Chairperson may open and close the meeting to public comment. Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Page Break ARTICLE IV Officers 1. Officers of the Committee shall consist of the Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary. 2. The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of the Committee shall be selected from the members of the Committee and elected by a majority vote of the members present. The Secretary shall be County Public Works staff assigned annually by the County Public Works Department Director. 3. Election of Officers shall be done annually at the January meeting of the Committee. 4. Vacated elected offices shall be filled by election/appointment by the Committee. The Vice-Chairperson shall assume the Chairpersonship in the event of absence of the Chairperson. Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Chairman Deleted: may be a non-member but shall be selected by the Committee by a majority vote of the members present Deleted: and appointment of the Secretary Deleted: Chairman Deleted: Chairmanship Deleted: Chairman V:\Water Resources Program\WRAC\BYLAWS\Adopted WRAC Bylaws.doc ADOPTED JULY 19, 2005 WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 23

24 Appointment Recommendations for WRAC Membership New Appointment: Agency/At-Large: Previous Member: Regular Members: George Luna City of Atascadero Jerry Clay Chuck Fellows City Of Arroyo Grande Joe Costello John Shoals City of Grover Beach Chuck Ashton Bruce Buel Nipomo CSD Ed Eby Francis (Mitch) Cooney Oceano CSD Rick Searcy Kris Vardas City of Pismo Beach Bill Rabenaldt Jeff Edwards Development-at-Large (proposed) NA Alternate Members: Jim Guthrie City Of Arroyo Grande Ed Arnold Steve Lieberman City of Grover Beach Larry Versaw TBD Los Osos CSD John Fouche Ed Eby Nipomo CSD Bruce Buel Vern Dahl Oceano CSD Francis (Mitch) Cooney Andrew Carter City of San Luis Obispo Allen Settle Michael Broadhurst Agriculture-at-Large John Snyder A. Sue Luft Environmental-at-Large Vacant David Chipping Environmental-at-Large Vacant TBD Development-at-Large (proposed) NA WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 24

25 . COUNlY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPUCATtON FOR APPOINTMENT TO A BOARD. COMMISSION, COMMITTEE Date --1 IA-I07. I I Applying For: Name: t-~!:-i- JfJ; S~ Last ( First Middle InitiaJ Ad dress: q.. S 6 ( 14 J "",.o...q 'D r, Ie ;,. (lj.", CJ 5 4 {; S- Number Street C. Zip Code Home Phone 8' C?78S-BusinessPhone '8' <19o::z... Supervisorial' District. / ~ Years resided in the county? <{- Present OccupationlEmployer: r;;~tn~.j- / jp~s..~ n.~.<..wh~ I ~ a., ~ (I... "'f-;$ J I If retired, past occupation/employer:.&-v~ "J~ owv\e...r- ~c:., - { 5> 1:, t --r~ -44 rej( \ Lu..E=. '\l"?= ~ ~ : ~ ~ ;,J- G-a u, ""0 -Y"" p". -%2 Education: B.s. ~~+r-tj ~}V"\~r\:f CSLA8. /"-/C~-",-~oY'\ (,o~~ 10- Ct..L"""~ ~r. I ~I Mp\'~"~A:5_/-'1 IJ~-H.'i" j~c:... - Ust any school courses, volunteer activities, special skills, training. certificates, licenses or work experience that you feel relate to your qualifications. If you like. you may attach a separate sheet for tl11s purpose or to state your qualifications. I I..- PrevIous service on county or city advisory bodies qr an elected office (namestdates): l- I ~~~ ~L7jSO"'f~ D~~~ ~<,,~Q r- -- tm.~,,!1 DM:S.. ~~, Y~J~'.-J- &~)( - ~~ {D(A~ - f I-r 4t "--- S ~ txbfo... C1-.e J ~ D G So - I. eyn"r-o,...w'vf'~ ~~~.~-- ~yo- 2 7lj~s. I (OVER) WRAC Agenda Item # ~ WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 25

26 Application for Membership on a Board. Commission, Committee Page two ~~ Should you be appointed, are you willing, If necessary for that particular body, to file a statement of disclosure as a public official under the standards set forth by the Fair Political Practice Commission? ~ YES - NO Comments:. published? _YES_NO WRAC Agenda Item # WRAC 2/7/07 Agenda Item #9 26