FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
|
|
- Austin Robertson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 61 California Street San Francisco, California Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of Californians Likely to Vote in the June 216 Democratic Primary about the Presidential Election - prepared for the - Sacramento Bee and Capitol Alert April 8, 216 1
2 Introduction This volume presents the statistical data developed from a Field Poll survey in California conducted among 1,4 registered voters, including 584 voters considered likely to vote in the state s June Democratic presidential primary. NOTE: The statewide sample was augmented among Democrats and Party Preference registrants to increase the number of interviews conducted among likely voters in the state s Democratic presidential primary. Interviews were administered by telephone in English and Spanish using live interviewers calling from the Davis Research central location call center in Calabasas during the period March 24, 215 April 4, 216. Sampling Individual voters were sample at random from listings derived from the statewide voter registration rolls. Once a voter s name and telephone had been selected, interviews are attempted only with the specified voter. Interviews can be conducted on either the voter s landline or cell phone, depending on the source of the telephone listing from the voter file and the preference of the voter. In this survey about two-thirds of all the interviews (63%) were completed with voters on their cell phones, while 37% were completed on a landline or other type of phone. Prior to the start of data collection, professionally-trained telephone interviewers were briefed with regard to the survey s proper calling and interviewing procedures by the Study Director. This session provided both interviewers and supervisors with an overview of the study and includes a question-by-question review of all items in the survey. Interviewers then completed survey interviews by telephone through the computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system. CATI controls the telephone scripts read to individual respondents by displaying the appropriate questionnaire items and their valid response code alternatives in their proper sequence on computer screens at each interviewer's booth. The interviewer then reads each question aloud to the respondent from the screen and enters each respondent's pre-coded answer category through the keyboard directly to a computer disk. All answers are automatically stored in computer memory. In order to bring hard-to-reach respondents into the survey, up to four attempts were made to each telephone number selected for inclusion into the sample. Callbacks were made at different times and on different days to increase the probability of finding voters available for the interview. Where possible, appointments are made at specified dates and times to maximize convenience. 2
3 Data Processing The data file resulting from CATI interviewing is itself virtually error-free. Even so, a final series of data checks were performed by means of a specially designed cleaning program that scrutinizes each respondent record for internally inconsistent information. Once the data were determined to be clean and error-free, the overall sample was weighted to align it to its proper statewide proportions by demographic characteristics of the state s registered voter population. Guide to Reading the Tables The following is an explanation of the detailed statistical tabulations contained in this report: The question or questions upon which the data are based is shown at the top of each table. Tables are percentaged vertically with the raw percentage base appearing at the top of each column. The data have been weighted to known parameters of the statewide registered voter population. All percentages and frequencies reported in each table are therefore weighted tabulations. In instances where percentages are calculated on small bases (e.g., when the base is fewer than 1 respondents) the reader is urged to interpret the data with caution, since results are subject to larger levels of sampling error. Throughout the tables an asterisk is used to denote a value of less than 1/2 of 1%. A hyphen indicates zero value. On some tables the percentages may add to more than 1% due to multiple mentions. s of subgroups used in the tabulations may add to less than the total number of respondents due to some respondents not reporting that characteristic. 3
4 Subgroup Definitions The following are some of the definitions applicable to some of the voter subgroups reported in this volume: Southern California: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Imperial, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Kern, and San Luis Obispo counties rthern California: all other 48 California counties SF Bay/rth/ Coast: San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Del rte, Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino, Santa Cruz, and Monterey counties Valley/ Sierras: Coastal Counties: Inland counties: Los Angeles: San Diego/Orange: So Cal: SF Bay Area: Valley: rth Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, Yuba, Siskiyou, Modoc, Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Lake, Sierra, Nevada, El Dorado, Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Tuolumne, Mono, Mariposa, and Inyo counties San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, San Francisco, Contra Costa, Alameda, Marin, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Santa Clara, Mendocino, Humboldt and Del rte counties all other 38 California counties Los Angeles County San Diego County and Orange counties San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Del rte, El Dorado, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Monterey, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Sierra, Siskiyou, Trinity, and Tuolumne 4
5 Estimates of Sampling Error In any survey based on a sampling, there is some sampling error introduced into the data by the process of sampling itself. When the sample has been drawn using random processes, it is possible to apply probability principles to determine the potential range of such error. While survey samples of human populations rarely, if ever, meet all of the criteria theoretically required for the application of these principles, it is customary to use them as an approximation of error that is introduced as a result of sampling. The table below shows the range of error associated with samples of various sizes at the 95% confidence level, which is customary for most public opinion surveys. For example, if 5% of the overall sample of 584 likely voters in the Democratic presidential primary answered yes to a specific question, this statistic would have a sampling error of plus or minus about 4. percentage points at the 95% confidence level. This means that there is a 95% chance that had the overall population of all likely Democratic primary voters statewide been interviewed using the same questionnaire and methods, the results of such a census would yield a result between 46% and 54%. The same procedure can be used to estimate the sample error ranges of any other statistic contained in this report. Approximate percentage distribution of replies to question Sample size 1% 3% 5% 7% 9% 2 +/ / / / / /- 3. +/ /- 5. +/ / / / /- 4. +/ / / / / / /- 1.9 There are many other possible sources of error other than sampling variability in this and any other public opinion survey. The overall design and execution of the survey minimized the potential for these other sources of error. 5
6 Questions Asked ASKED OF LIKELY VOTERS IN THE JUNE CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY: I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote (NAMES OF CANDIDATES READ IN RANDOM ORDER) or someone else? ASKED OF ALL REGISTERED VOTERS: Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion. (NAMES AND TITLES OF CANDIDATES READ IN RANDOM ORDER) Is your opinion of (NAME) favorable or unfavorable? 6
7 Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 1) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% Hillary Clinton 47.4% 47.2% 47.7% 49.4% 44.8% 46.8% 49.1% 5.7% 39.5% 45.2% 46.9% 55.2% 23.1% 49.8% % 38.% 45.3% 49.2% 64.2% 42.7% Bernie Sanders 41.4% 42.5% 4.% 45.7% 3.4% 44.7% 31.7% 4.5% 46.2% 44.4% 29.3% 39.2% 71.8% 39.1% % 59.2% 42.9% 42.2% 25.% 43.5% (DO NOT READ) OTHER 4.1% 2.6% 5.9%.4% 15.1% 1.7% 11.2%.5% 5.% 4.8% 14.1%.5% 4.4% 3.1% - 7.9% 1.7% 5.5% 2.2% 1.8% 2.2% (DO NOT * READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 7.7% 6.4% 4.5% 9.7% 6.8% 7.9% 8.3% 9.3% 5.5% 9.8% 5.2%.7% 8.% - 3.8% 1.2% 6.4% 6.3% 9.% 11.7% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 1 7
8 Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 2) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% Hillary Clinton 47.4% 4.3% 53.% 17.6% 3.6% 51.2% 54.2% 63.9% 44.6% 57.6% 47.1% 42.5% 48.8% 54.6% 43.8% % 46.1% Bernie Sanders 41.4% 48.5% 35.8% 77.2% 56.2% 39.3% 33.7% 23.2% 45.7% 36.5% 24.% 33.4% 37.2% 41.% 49.3% % 42.6% (DO NOT READ) OTHER 4.1% 6.8% 2.1% 1.1% 5.4% 1.3% 4.1% 6.6% 4.4% 1.7% 13.1% 15.2% 7.% - 1.% % 3.9% (DO NOT READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 4.4% 9.1% 4.1% 7.9% 8.1% 8.% 6.2% 5.3% 4.2% 15.8% 8.9% 7.% 4.5% 5.9% % 7.4% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 2 8
9 Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 3) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 H.S. graduate or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college/ trade school College graduate Post graduate work $2, Under - $2, $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant/ other Christian Catholic religion preference Married/ t married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Parent Grandparent Neither Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% Hillary Clinton 47.4% 56.8% 43.8% 36.2% 57.3% 46.4% 49.5% 4.8% 45.7% 5.5% 58.1% 54.7% 34.2% 46.8% 49.9% 56.7% 34.6% 45.9% 56.% 46.6% 47.8% Bernie Sanders 41.4% 35.3% 38.% 53.2% 36.2% 42.9% 44.3% 45.6% 45.% 38.8% 31.9% 31.7% 58.8% 37.4% 4.% 29.5% 54.8% 43.7% 3.1% 42.4% 4.8% (DO NOT READ) OTHER 4.1% 4.2% 9.9% 1.3% 1.6% 5.4% 2.6% 4.6% 3.% 5.5% 5.6% 4.2% 1.7% 6.4% 4.7% 5.% 2.2% 5.8% 9.6% 2.9% 3.7% (DO NOT READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 3.7% 8.3% 9.3% 4.9% 5.3% 3.6% 9.% 6.3% 5.2% 4.4% 9.3% 5.3% 9.5% 5.4% 8.8% 8.5% 4.6% 4.3% 8.1% 7.7% n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 3 9
10 Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 4) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Tenure Union Affiliation Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference GOP 23 CA recall voter Own Rent / McClintock union n-union Schwarz- Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump /other /Don't HH HH enegger recall Didn't vote Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? Weighted Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders (DO NOT READ) OTHER (DO NOT READ) UNDECIDED % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 51.3% 41.6% 52.9% 45.8% 1.% % 37.1% 49.6% 39.9% 41.8% - 1.% % 5.4% 2.% 2.7% 4.7% % 6.2% 6.8% 4.6% 7.7% Field Research Corporation Table 4 1
11 Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 5) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Voter Age Voters under age 4 Voters age 4+ Gender Ethnicity Marital Status Gender Ethnicity Marital Status Married/ Married/ Male Female White t Single White t Single Asian/ Asian/ non- Latino married /Never All other Male Female non- Latino married /Never Hispanic living married Hispanic living married All other together together Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% Hillary Clinton 47.4% 25.% 17.4% 31.9% 26.3% 25.4% 19.% 26.1% 26.1% - 57.% 51.2% 61.3% 51.3% 65.5% 66.1% 58.2% 47.3% 59.9% Bernie Sanders 41.4% 65.2% 71.6% 59.4% 62.1% 69.% 67.% 63.9% 65.3% 84.7% 31.2% 37.5% 26.5% 37.% 23.9% 2.1% 31.7% 39.% 26.4% (DO NOT READ) OTHER 4.1% 3.6% 7.5% - 5.9% - 3.6% 6.% % 4.4% 6.4% 2.9% 5.4% 3.8% 1.6% 4.2% 5.4% 4.4% (DO NOT READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 6.2% 3.5% 8.7% 5.6% 5.6% 1.3% 4.% 8.6% - 7.4% 4.9% 9.3% 6.2% 6.8% 12.2% 5.8% 8.3% 9.3% Field Research Corporation Table 5 11
12 Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 1: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 74.5% 76.% 83.4% 63.9% 79.1% 64.1% 74.2% 78.2% 69.1% 64.6% 81.4% 91.3% 74.8% % 69.4% 79.4% 67.2% 71.% 76.9% UN 16.2% 15.9% 16.6% 1.% 27.6% 12.5% 26.8% 16.6% 9.7% 21.7% 26.6% 1.9% 8.7% 16.5% % 14.6% 16.1% 18.1% 15.% 9.5% % 9.6% 7.3% 6.7% 8.4% 8.4% 9.2% 9.2% 12.1% 9.3% 8.8% 7.7% - 8.8% - 8.% 16.% 4.5% 14.6% 14.1% 13.5% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 81 12
13 Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 2: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% % 79.8% 71.2% 92.8% 83.6% 84.9% 69.5% 58.9% 77.% 63.3% 47.3% 6.3% 67.9% 76.7% 88.9% % 77.8% UN % 13.6% 18.5% 2.9% 11.4% 6.8% 16.1% 33.6% 15.5% 21.1% 42.3% 2.9% 19.2% 13.4% 9.8% % 15.5% % 6.6% 1.3% 4.4% 5.% 8.3% 14.5% 7.5% 7.5% 15.6% 1.5% 18.8% 12.9% 9.9% 1.3% % 6.7% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 82 13
14 Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 3: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% 1.% % % % % % % % % 59.6% 65.4% 84.6% 85.6% 57.3% 7.7% 63.2% 83.9% 82.6% 74.5% 63.3% 86.9% 72.6% 76.9% 57.1% 83.2% 82.6% 56.% 76.9% 72.3% UNFAVORABL E 16.2% 22.8% 24.1% 9.9% 11.5% 19.5% 19.6% 2.6% 13.9% 13.4% 16.9% 22.8% 8.6% 18.7% 15.6% 29.4% 8.9% 11.% 33.1% 14.1% 18.3% % 17.6% 1.5% 5.5% 2.9% 23.1% 9.7% 16.2% 2.2% 4.% 8.6% 13.9% 4.5% 8.7% 7.6% 13.5% 7.9% 6.4% 11.% 8.9% 9.4% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 83 14
15 Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 4: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger GOP 23 CA recall voter McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% % 1.% 1.% % 74.% 77.6% 76.2% 74.7% 81.9% 66.2% 61.% 99.1% % 45.3% % 66.2% 78.8% UN 16.2% 19.8% 1.% 14.3% 17.1% 11.% 23.2% 26.3%.5% % 39.8% % 23.1% 13.% % 6.2% 12.4% 9.6% 8.2% 7.1% 1.5% 12.7%.4% % 14.9% % 1.7% 8.2% Field Research Corporation Table 84 15
16 Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 1: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 69.4% 7.4% 73.2% 65.7% 71.% 66.7% 75.4% 63.8% 63.% 61.2% 78.7% 57.4% 73.6% % 67.% 68.6% 71.3% 8.1% 66.4% UN 27.2% 27.% 27.4% 25.2% 31.% 26.1% 3.4% 19.2% 35.1% 35.% 35.3% 19.5% 42.6% 23.5% % 28.2% 29.8% 24.4% 9.9% 32.5% * * 2.9% 3.5% 2.2% 1.5% 3.3% 3.% 2.8% 5.4% 1.1% 2.% 3.5% 1.8% - 2.9% - 2.9% 4.9% 1.5% 4.2% 1.% 1.1% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 73 16
17 Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 2: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% % 6.3% 78.1% 43.5% 62.8% 71.5% 81.4% 77.% 67.7% 83.3% 55.6% 49.3% 67.1% 77.5% 75.4% % 69.4% UN % 36.9% 18.8% 5.4% 35.3% 26.8% 15.4% 2.6% 29.6% 12.4% 44.4% 5.7% 28.% 21.6% 24.2% % 27.1% * * % 2.8% 3.% 6.1% 1.8% 1.7% 3.2% 2.4% 2.7% 4.3% %.9%.4% - -.8% 3.5% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 74 17
18 Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 3: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% 1.% % % % % % % % % 72.8% 55.8% 69.9% 81.9% 62.% 72.4% 62.1% 69.7% 72.% 77.4% 73.7% 59.6% 68.9% 75.2% 66.3% 57.8% 71.3% 76.7% 67.4% 69.3% UNFAVORABL E 27.2% 24.6% 39.6% 27.4% 16.4% 35.3% 19.3% 34.2% 28.8% 26.7% 2.6% 21.6% 36.7% 29.9% 23.6% 27.% 37.3% 26.6% 21.9% 28.8% 27.4% % 2.6% 4.6% 2.7% 1.7% 2.7% 8.2% 3.7% 1.5% 1.3% 2.% 4.7% 3.7% 1.2% 1.2% 6.6% 5.% 2.1% 1.4% 3.7% 3.2% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 75 18
19 Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 4: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger GOP 23 CA recall voter McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% % 1.% 1.% % 75.% 6.7% 69.7% 69.7% 69.4% 7.5% 98.% 49.6% % 26.1% % 71.7% 71.% UN 27.2% 23.4% 34.3% 27.2% 27.4% 27.5% 26.8% 1.6% 46.5% % 72.6% % 23.9% 25.6% % 1.6% 4.9% 3.% 2.9% 3.1% 2.7%.4% 3.9% % 1.3% % 4.4% 3.5% Field Research Corporation Table 76 19
20 Q12c (Banner 1: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 52.5% 58.9% 69.% 44.8% 6.1% 42.1% 58.7% 48.9% 48.% 42.5% 69.5% 56.9% 72.5% 19.7% 62.6% 61.9% 51.6% 59.3% 65.8% 58.5% UN 34.8% 37.2% 31.2% 23.% 42.7% 3.3% 46.1% 31.9% 39.6% 41.7% 43.3% 21.4% 42.4% 17.4% 7.4% 26.9% 23.4% 39.3% 26.9% 21.2% 32.2% * % 1.4% 9.9% 7.9% 12.5% 9.5% 11.8% 9.4% 11.5% 1.3% 14.1% 9.%.7% 1.1% 9.9% 1.5% 14.7% 9.2% 13.9% 13.% 9.3% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 61 2
21 Q12c (Banner 2: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 54.7% 55.3% 78.% 62.8% 57.% 47.1% 42.% 55.3% 54.2% 19.6% 27.3% 54.1% 77.9% 88.2% 1.9% 33.4% 41.2% 59.8% UN % 37.3% 32.6% 18.7% 28.3% 31.5% 37.3% 49.5% 35.2% 31.% 75.1% 52.% 32.9% 12.2% 1.6% 83.6% 49.8% 43.9% 31.7% % 8.% 12.1% 3.4% 8.9% 11.5% 15.6% 8.5% 9.4% 14.8% 5.3% 2.7% 13.% 1.% 1.1% 5.5% 16.8% 14.9% 8.5% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 62 21
22 Q12c (Banner 3: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% 1.% % % % % % % % % 45.7% 48.2% 62.3% 62.6% 58.8% 52.9% 47.2% 56.8% 57.7% 42.6% 51.7% 64.5% 66.3% 51.5% 44.2% 73.6% 57.5% 4.6% 57.5% 54.1% UNFAVORABL E 34.8% 34.7% 4.1% 29.8% 34.4% 21.1% 35.4% 38.5% 34.8% 37.1% 45.5% 36.3% 27.4% 26.4% 4.1% 38.4% 15.9% 32.8% 47.4% 32.7% 35.6% % 19.6% 11.7% 7.8% 2.9% 2.1% 11.7% 14.3% 8.4% 5.2% 11.9% 12.% 8.1% 7.3% 8.3% 17.3% 1.5% 9.7% 12.% 9.8% 1.3% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 63 22
23 Q12c (Banner 4: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating GOP 23 CA recall voter Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 51.2% 61.8% 58.6% 54.% 57.3% 51.7% 61.% 99.1% 26.5% 47.5% 8.1% 77.7% 19.4% 23.8% 6.% 17.3% 6.1% 53.9% 41.8% UN 34.8% 4.1% 25.7% 3.1% 36.3% 34.% 36.% 26.3%.5% 66.5% 44.2% 83.6% 13.8% 69.3% 65.9% 85.8% 72.7% 29.4% 35.3% 43.6% % 8.7% 12.5% 11.3% 9.7% 8.7% 12.3% 12.7%.4% 7.% 8.4% 8.3% 8.5% 11.3% 1.3% 8.2% 1.% 1.5% 1.7% 14.6% Field Research Corporation Table 64 23
24 Q12a (Banner 1: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 44.1% 51.9% 58.4% 42.7% 51.% 37.5% 55.3% 35.4% 36.% 38.9% 61.9% 38.5% 72.5% 11.6% 43.5% 44.6% 4.2% 57.8% 74.3% 49.4% UN 48.3% 51.2% 43.9% 36.4% 54.4% 43.8% 59.8% 37.8% 61.9% 6.6% 58.4% 32.2% 6.8% 23.8% 84.7% 5.1% 47.9% 55.9% 36.3% 17.5% 46.5% * % 4.7% 4.3% 5.2% 2.9% 5.2% 2.7% 6.9% 2.7% 3.4% 2.7% 5.9%.7% 3.7% 3.7% 6.4% 7.5% 3.9% 5.9% 8.3% 4.1% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 53 24
25 Q12a (Banner 2: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted % 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 39.7% 53.8% 38.2% 49.9% 45.7% 52.1% 46.8% 45.1% 62.2% 12.8% 18.7% 48.1% 74.% 73.% 2.4% 25.8% 35.% 51.4% UN % 56.8% 4.8% 52.% 46.9% 52.2% 42.6% 5.8% 5.6% 32.7% 82.5% 81.3% 45.3% 22.% 26.3% 95.9% 67.2% 6.6% 44.1% % 3.5% 5.4% 9.8% 3.3% 2.1% 5.3% 2.5% 4.4% 5.2% 4.7% - 6.6% 3.9%.8% 1.7% 6.9% 4.5% 4.5% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 54 25
26 Q12a (Banner 3: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 1.% 1.% % % % % % % % % 49.4% 37.2% 5.3% 52.9% 56.1% 48.% 4.8% 45.4% 47.% 34.6% 54.4% 44.9% 61.3% 47.1% 41.9% 51.2% 46.9% 49.9% 46.5% 47.3% UNFAVORABL E 48.3% 45.9% 56.2% 45.5% 44.7% 37.9% 46.3% 55.6% 5.1% 49.1% 59.9% 41.4% 5.5% 35.3% 5.2% 51.5% 4.2% 5.% 47.9% 47.7% 47.6% % 4.7% 6.7% 4.2% 2.4% 6.1% 5.7% 3.6% 4.5% 4.% 5.5% 4.2% 4.7% 3.3% 2.7% 6.5% 8.6% 3.1% 2.2% 5.8% 5.1% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 55 26
27 Q12a (Banner 4: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating GOP 23 CA recall voter Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% % 47.1% 47.5% 51.1% 45.9% 44.6% 5.9% 98.% 49.6% 11.9% 31.6% % 6.8% 8.6% 8.3% 8.9% 52.6% 48.% 38.4% UN 48.3% 5.% 45.4% 43.5% 49.8% 49.8% 46.1% 1.6% 46.5% 84.2% 66.2% 1.% 21.7% 89.9% 89.6% 91.7% 86.9% 42.6% 47.1% 59.% % 2.9% 7.1% 5.4% 4.3% 5.6% 3.%.4% 3.9% 3.9% 2.2% - 5.4% 3.3% 1.8% - 4.2% 4.8% 5.% 2.6% Field Research Corporation Table 56 27
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 15 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 8 32563 Tabulations From a Survey of California Registered Voters About the Job Performance of the
More informationThe California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief
Increasing Proportions of Vote-by-Mail Ballots In Millions 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. VBM Use Rates by Sub-Group Youth and Older Voters: Disparities in VBM Use Only voters age 55 and older use VBM at a rate
More informationHMO PLANS Anthem Select $ $1, $1,541.23
& one Dep., & 2 Anthem Select $592.78 $1,185.56 $1,541.23 Reimbursement NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE $592.78 $1,185.56 $1,237.00 Differential (Amount Not Reimbursed) $0.00 $0.00 $304.23 Anthem Traditional
More informationRURAL CAUCUS BY-LAWS California Democratic Party State Central Committee
RURAL CAUCUS BY-LAWS California Democratic Party State Central Committee (Last amended 04/13/13 at Rural Caucus during CDP State Convention in Sacramento.) ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSE SECTION 1: NAME The
More informationMr. John Mott-Smith Chief, Elections Division Secretary of State th Street, Sixth Floor Sacramento, CA Dear Mr.
April 16, 2004 Mr. John Mott-Smith Chief, Elections Division Secretary of State 1500 11 th Street, Sixth Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Subject: State Certification and Federal Qualification of County Voting
More informationThe California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief
Increasing Proportions of Vote-by-Mail Ballots In Millions 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. VBM Use Rates by Sub-Group Youth and Older Voters: Disparities in VBM Use Only voters age 55 and older use VBM at a rate
More informationJUSTICE BY GEOGRAPHY: DO POLITICS INFLUENCE THE PROSECUTION OF YOUTH AS ADULTS?
JUSTICE BY GEOGRAPHY: DO POLITICS INFLUENCE THE PROSECUTION OF YOUTH AS ADULTS? Mike Males, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice June 2016 Research Report Introduction
More informationLegislative Policy Study. Can California County Jails Absorb Low-Level State Prisoners?
CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE MARCH 2011 www.cjcj.org Legislative Policy Study Can California County Jails Absorb Low-Level State Prisoners? by Mike Males, PhD Senior Research Fellow, Center
More informationThree Strikes Analysis: Urban vs. Rur al Counties
Three Strikes Analysis: Urban vs. Rur al Counties Jessica Jin 16 Jennifer Walsh, PhD, Project Supervisor May 3, 216 85 Columbia Avenue Kravis Center 436 Claremont, CA 91711-642 P: (99) 621-8159 E: roseinstitute@cmc.edu
More information1: HOW DID YOUTH VOTER TURNOUT DIFFER FROM THE REST OF THE 2012 ELECTORATE?
March 2013 The Califor nia Civic Enga gement Project CALIFORNIA'S 2012 YOUTH VOTER TURNOUT: DISPARATE GROWTH AND REMAINING CHALLENGES Boosted by online registration, the youth electorate (ages 18-24) in
More informationState 4-H Council Bylaws Adopted 10/23/2010 R = Required O = Optional
. Article 1 Membership State 4-H Council Bylaws Adopted 10/23/2010 = equired O = Optional Section 1 Categories Membership shall be active, ex-officio and honorary, and open to all persons without regard
More informationImpact of Realignment on County Jail Populations
Technical Appendix Impact of Realignment on County Jail Populations Magnus Lofstrom and Steven Raphael with research support from Brandon Martin Supported with funding from the Smith Richardson Foundation
More information25% Percent of General Voters 20% 15% 10%
Policy Brief Issue 6 May 2013 Page 1 The California Civic Engagement Project Policy Brief Issue 6 May 2013 In This Brief: In 2012, Latinos increased their share of California voters, but their proportion
More information-- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES NEW ALL COUNTY LETTERS
CCWRO Weekly New Welfare News - #2002-10 March 13, 2002 HEADLINES --IN BRIEF -- DSS NEWS -- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES NEW ALL COUNTY LETTERS -- TANF UPDATE -- CWD VICTIMS OF THE WEEK --STATISTICS OF
More informationVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION Adopted October 12, 1988 Amended September 27, 1989 Amended January 27, 1990 Amended January 24, 1990 Amended June 28, 1992 Amended
More information1. Summary of the FY coordinated claim for Sonoma County Transit Services dated April, 28, 2009 marked Exhibit A and attached hereto;
Resolution No. Administration Building Santa Rosa, CA June 9, 2009 CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SONOMA COUNTY, AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, AND SONOMA COUNTY
More informationCounty Structure & Powers
County Structure & Powers There is a fundamental distinction between a county and a city. Counties lack broad powers of self-government that California cities have (e.g., cities have broad revenue generating
More informationConstitution of the California State Division International Association for Identification as amended through May 2, 2018 Las Vegas, Nevada
Constitution of the California State Division International Association for Identification as amended through May 2, 2018 Las Vegas, Nevada ARTICLE I NAME AND GOALS OF THE ASSOCIATION SECTION 1.01 NAME
More informationCounty-by- County Data
April 2017 State and Local Tax Contributions of Undocumented Californians -by- Data Public debates in California over immigrants, specifically around undocumented immigrants, often suffer from insufficient
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS RECOMMENDATIONS... 6 CONCLUSION... 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 CURRENT LAW... 2 2014 REPORT SUMMARY... 2 2017 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY... 3 COMPLIANCE FINDINGS... 3 COMMON POLICY DEFICIENCIES... 4 FAILURE TO MANDATE NOTIFICATION OF
More informationVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION Adopted October 12, 1988 Amended September 27, 1989 Amended January 27, 1990 Amended January 24, 1990 Amended June 28, 1992 Amended
More informationRules Committee Report Anaheim, California Saturday, October 21, 2017
Rules Committee Report Anaheim, California Saturday, October 21, 2017 The Rules Committee met on Saturday, October 21, 2017 in the Grand G-H Room at the Anaheim Marriott to consider proposed bylaw changes
More informationCalifornia Public Defender Websites
California Websites This directory of California websites and contact information is a companion piece to New Beginnings: A Congregational Guide to Restorative Justice through Expungement. The version
More informationPART I Introduction to Civil Litigation for the Paralegal
PART I Introduction to Civil Litigation for the Paralegal CHAPTER 1 Litigation and the Paralegal KEY POINTS Civil Litigation in California State Courts is regulated by: California Code of Civil Procedure
More informationCALIFORNIA S 58 CRIME RATES: REALIGNMENT AND CRIME IN 2012
CALIFORNIA S 58 CRIME RATES: REALIGNMENT AND CRIME IN 2012 Mike Males, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow Brian Goldstein, Policy Analyst Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice JANUARY 2014 Research Report
More informationSPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER S USE DEED OF TRUST WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: ORDER NO.: Parcel No.: SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER S USE DEED OF TRUST WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS This DEED OF TRUST, made, between whose address
More informationCalifornia State Senators
California State Senators # Photo Last Name First Name Term Ends Address Phone Fax Website Email SD 36 Anderson Joel- R 2018 State Capitol, (916)651-4036 (916) 651-4936 http://district36 Room 5052.cssrc.us/
More informationEnactment Of Tax Measures By Legislature
University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository nitiatives California Ballot Propositions and nitiatives 2-10-1977 Enactment Of Tax Measures By Legislature Follow
More informationREGIONS SECTION 15 ACSA POLICIES & PROCEDURES
2018 REGIONS SECTION 15 POLICIES & PROCEDURES Policies: 15.1 Region Governing Boards Each region governing board shall include at least: president, vice president for legislative action, treasurer and
More informationAgricultural Workers--Collective Bargaining Rights And Secondary Boycott Prohibition
University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 10-28-1971 Agricultural Workers--Collective Bargaining
More informationContents APA CALIFORNIA BYLAWS
Contents Article 1. NAME, AREA SERVED, AND NON-PROFIT NATURE... 4 1.1 NAME... 4 1.2 AREA SERVED... 4 1.3 NON-PROFIT NATURE OF CHAPTER... 4 Article 2. PURPOSE AND AFFILIATED ENTITIES... 4 2.1 STATEMENT
More informationCALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES. County Offices and Ballot Measures
CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES 1999 ELECTIONS County Offices and Ballot Measures Institute for Social Research Center For California Studies California State University,
More informationCriminal Justice Realignment:
Criminal Justice Realignment: What Counties Need to Know to Implement Jointly Presented by: CSAC, CPOC, CSSA, CDAA, CPDA and AOC September 2011 What is Criminal Justice Realignment? Shifts custody of felons
More informationThese are the highlights of the latest Field Poll completed among a random sample of 997 California registered voters.
THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,
More informationBYLAWS ARTICLE I OFFICES ARTICLE II MEMBERS
BYLAWS OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS ARTICLE I OFFICES 1.1 Principal Office. The principal office of California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions (
More informationUSA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION
USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION OF THE PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION OF USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I NAME Name... 3 Address...
More informationState Employee Salaries
University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 2-9-1972 State Employee Salaries Follow this and additional
More information01/19/2018. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
0 SSAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MICHAEL T. RISHER () (MRISHER@ACLUNC.ORG) RAUL L. MACIAS (0) (RMACIAS@ACLUCA.ORG) Drumm Street, nd Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone:
More informationAppendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report
Appendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership Membership
More informationBYLAWS DEPOSITION REPORTERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation
BYLAWS OF DEPOSITION REPORTERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I OFFICES OF THE CORPORATION Section 1. PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE. The principal
More informationReport on Arrests for Driving Under the Influence in California, 1997
Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 3-1999 Report on Arrests for Driving Under the Influence in California, 1997 Office of the Attorney
More informationSECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
CALSAWS CONSORTIUM SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT Originally Adopted: December 1998 First Amended: June 2007 Second Amended: June 2010 Amended and Restated: September 2017
More informationProposed gas tax repeal backed five to four. Support tied to voter views about the state s high gas prices rather than the condition of its roads
Jack Citrin Center for Public Opinion Research Institute of Governmental Studies 124-126 Moses Hall University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 Tel: 510-642- 6835 Email: igs@berkeley.edu Release
More informationPREPARED FOR: Breaking ICE s Hold. Presented by: Angela Chan Senior Staff Attorney and Policy Director Advancing Justice Asian Law Caucus
PREPARED FOR: Breaking ICE s Hold Presented by: Angela Chan Senior Staff Attorney and Policy Director Advancing Justice Asian Law Caucus About us Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus San Francisco, CA
More informationHow Proposed Changes to the Public Charge Rule Will Affect Health, Hunger and the Economy in California
THE UCLA CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH 1 The Center s 2018 Health Policy Seminar Series: How Proposed Changes to the Public Charge Rule Will Affect Health, Hunger and the Economy in California Ninez
More informationI A I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y C A LI F O R N
DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125 CITIZENSHIP AND POLITICAL REPRESENTATION IN CONTEMPORARY CALIFORNIA R. Michael Alvarez Tara
More informationCalifor nia Migration: A Comparative Analysis CALIFORNIA. A Comparative Analysis NEXT 10
Califor nia Migration: A Comparative Analysis CALIFORNIA M I G R AT I O N A Comparative Analysis $ NEXT 1 1 PRODUCED BY Next 1 F. Noel Perry Colleen Kredell Marcia E. Perry Stephanie Leonard PREPARED BY
More informationCalifornia Court Reporters Association Bylaws (Adopted October 4, 2017)
California Court Reporters Association Bylaws (Adopted October 4, 2017) ARTICLE 1 NAME The name of this organization shall be the California Court Reporters Association, Incorporated (hereinafter referred
More informationRelease #2337 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Friday, June 4, 2010
THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,
More informationCalifornia Counts. California s Newest Immigrants. Summary. Public Policy Institute of California POPULATION TRENDS AND PROFILES
POPULATION TRENDS AND PROFILES Hans P. Johnson, editor Volume 5 Number 2 November 2003 California s Newest Immigrants By Laura E. Hill and Joseph M. Hayes Immigration and immigrant adaptation are an integral
More informationAGENDA ITEM 9A. MEETING: July 18, 2018
MEETING: July 18, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9A Humboldt LAFCo Commissioners Colette Metz, Executive Officer CALAFCO Annual Conference Items The Commission will receive a report relating to 2018
More information2013 UCLA Asian American Studies Center. All rights reserved. Asian American Studies Center Bridging Research with Community
Ford Foundation The Ford Foundation supports visionary leaders and organizations on the frontlines of social change worldwide. Created with gifts and bequests by Edsel and Henry Ford, the foundation is
More informationRelease #2345 Release Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010
THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,
More informationFBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOCIATES, INC., CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE BOARD PROTOCOL AND POLICIES
FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOCIATES, INC., CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE BOARD PROTOCOL AND POLICIES The Executive Board Protocol and Policies are dedicated to the memory and service of Past President Bernard
More informationCalifornia Counts. A State of Diversity Demographic Trends in California s Regions. Summary. Public Policy Institute of California
POPULATION TRENDS AND PROFILES Hans P. Johnson, editor Volume 3 Number 5 May 2002 Demographic Trends in California s Regions By Hans P. Johnson This edition of uses recent data from the 2000 Census to
More informationLegislative Policy Study. Proposition 19: Did Failure Build Larger Success?
Appendix A. Demographics of Proposition 19 vote CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FEBRUARY 2011 www.cjcj.org Legislative Policy Study Proposition 19: Did Failure Build Larger Success? by Mike Males,
More informationMarijuana. Use And Possession.
University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 10-5-1973 Marijuana. Use And Possession. Follow this
More informationTHE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact
Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94108-2814 415.392.5763 FAX: 415.434.2541 field.com/fieldpollonline THE FIELD POLL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY
More informationCalifornia Republican Party
Standing Rules and Bylaws of the California Republican Party As Amended October 22, 2017* *On-line version updated 11-16-17 to correct formatting errors 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CRP Standing Rules & Bylaws
More informationSYSTEMWIDE OFFICE of the EDUCATION ABROAD PROGRAM (UCEAP) 2011 Brazil Student Visa Information: PUC-Rio de Janeiro Programs
SYSTEMWIDE OFFICE of the EDUCATION ABROAD PROGRAM (UCEAP) 2011 Brazil Student Visa Information: PUC-Rio de Janeiro Programs To receive a visa is a privilege, not a right. Consulates reserve the right to
More informationPPIC Statewide Survey:
Global California: PPIC Statewide Survey: Perspectives on U.S.-Japan Relations Mark Baldassare Senior Fellow and Survey Director September 2001 Public Policy Institute of California Contents Press Release
More informationUSA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED) PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION OF THE PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION (A MEMBER OF
USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION OF THE PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION (A MEMBER OF USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I NAME Name...
More informationCalifornia Civic Engagement Project
California Civic Engagement Project Policy Brief Issue 10 July 2015 Page 1 Policy Brief Issue 10 July 2015 Highlights: Only 17.3% of eligible Latinos and 18.4% of eligible Asian Americans voted in the
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER UNDER CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE 42 U.S.C. 1983
(HC) McCullock v. Cate et al Doc. 7 Att. 1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER UNDER CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE 42 U.S.C. 1983 I. Scope of Section 1983 An action under Section 1983 is available
More informationDisparities in California s Uncounted Vote-by-Mail Ballots: Youth, Language Preference and Military Status
The California Civic Engagement Project Disparities in California s Uncounted Vote-by-Mail Ballots: Youth, Language Preference and Military Status The (CCEP) recently published an issue brief examining
More informationIntegration Potential of California s Immigrants and Their Children
ROSENBERG FOUNDATION Integration Potential of California s Immigrants and Their Children > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > New Estimates of Potential New Voters at the State, County, and Legislative District
More informationDRAFT BYLAWS for Caucus Comments of the CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE VETERANS CAUCUS ARTICLE I NAME
DRAFT BYLAWS for Caucus Comments of the CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE VETERANS CAUCUS ARTICLE I NAME SECTION 1. NAME: The name of this organization shall be the Veterans Caucus of
More informationCOUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS
COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS Last Updated: September 27, 2016 DISCLAIMER:
More informationRelease #2486 Release Date: Friday, September 12, 2014
THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco,
More informationTHE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact
Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94108-2814 415.392.5763 FAX: 415.434.2541 field.com/fieldpollonline THE FIELD POLL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY
More informationPOLL DATA HIGHLIGHTS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGISTERED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.
- - - - - - e THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN STATEWIDE SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 947 BY MERVIN D. FIELD. 234 Front Street San Francisco 94 (45) 392-5763 COPYRIGHT 978 BY THE FIELD INSTITUTE.
More informationCounty of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report
Revision No. 20170501-1 County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report Agenda Item Number: 1 (This Section for use by Clerk of the Board Only.) Clerk of the Board 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403
More informationMarquette Law School Poll --- February 18-21, 2016
Marquette Law School Poll --- February 18-21, 2016 S1. May I please speak with the (male/female) adult member of your household, currently at home, age 18 or older, with the most recent birthday? (IF SELECTED
More informationResolutions Committee Report Anaheim, CA Saturday, October 21, 2017
Resolutions Committee Report Anaheim, CA Saturday, October 21, 2017 The Resolutions Committee met on Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 4:00pm in Grand D at the Anaheim Marriott to consider resolutions for
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BY A PRISONER:
(PC) Trevino v. Gomez, et al Doc. 62 Att. 1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BY A PRISONER: 1. AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNDER BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN
More informationTwo-to-one voter support for Marijuana Legalization (Prop. 64) and Gun Control (Prop. 63) initiatives.
UC Berkeley IGS Poll Title Two-to-one voter support for Marijuana Legalization (Prop. 64) and Gun Control (Prop. 63) initiatives. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/51c1h00j Author DiCamillo, Mark
More informationNBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll Iowa September 20, 2012 Presidential Election Questionnaire
Screener Are you 18 years of age or older? Do you consider your permanent home address to be in Iowa? HH SELECTION LANDLINE FRAME ONLY GENDER GUESS NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll Iowa
More informationMarquette Law School Poll March 24-28, 2016
Marquette Law School Poll March 24-28, 2016 S1. May I please speak with the (male/female) adult member of your household, currently at home, age 18 or older, with the most recent birthday? (IF SELECTED
More informationMCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES NATIONAL OMNIBUS March 23, 2016
MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES NATIONAL OMNIBUS March 23, 2016 1. FOR THE 2016 NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT, HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE TO VOTE? VERY LIKELY 87.8 SOMEWHAT LIKELY 12.2 2. DO YOU
More informationCalifornia Xegi$Lature PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE STATE SENATE
California Xegi$Lature.- DON PERATA PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE STATE SENATE CORRESPONDENC'E~ 1paga,165 June 6,2008 The Honorable Thomas Mayfield County Supervisor Stanislaus County 101 0 10th St, Suite 6500
More informationCOUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS
COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS Last Updated: September 27, 2016 DISCLAIMER:
More informationCriminal Appeals in California
California Law Review Volume 24 Issue 6 Article 1 September 1936 Criminal Appeals in California Ronald H. Beattie Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview
More informationBYLAWS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS. (a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation) ARTICLE I. General Provisions
Draft approved by the Board 6/19/18 Approved by the Membership / /18 BYLAWS OF CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS (a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation) ARTICLE I. General
More informationHealth Coverage and Care for Undocumented Immigrants
Health Coverage and Care for Undocumented Immigrants November 10, 2015 Iwunze Ugo, Shannon McConville, Joseph Hayes, and Laura Hill Overview California policy and undocumented immigrants Population estimates
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE) ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationCALIFORNIA ELECTIONS DATA ARCHIVE INTRODUCTION
CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS DATA ARCHIVE INTRODUCTION The California Elections Data Archive (CEDA) is a joint project of the Center for California Studies and the Institute for Social Research, both of California
More informationRelease #2475 Release Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 WHILE CALIFORNIANS ARE DISSATISFIED
THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco,
More informationHealth Policy Research Brief
Health Policy Research Brief June 2005 More Than 2.9 Million Californians Now Food Insecure One in Three Low-Income, An Increase in Just Two Years Gail G. Harrison, George Manalo-LeClair, Anthony Ramirez,
More informationTHE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2007: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1
THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2007: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1 Ruth Milkman and Bongoh Kye UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment September 2007
More informationLoras College Statewide Wisconsin Survey October/November 2016
Loras College Statewide Wisconsin Survey October/November 0 Field Dates: October November, 0 Completed Surveys: 00 Margin of Error: +/.% Note on Methodology: The Loras College Poll surveyed 00 Wisconsin
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/15/2018 (UPDATE)
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/15/2018 (UPDATE) ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationBylaws of the California Association of Resource Conservation Districts
Bylaws of the California Association of Resource Conservation Districts Approved November 2013 California Association of Resource Conservation Districts 801 K Street, 18 th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916)
More informationCalifornia Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer: This guide is designed for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The Election Protection Coalition does not warrant
More informationNBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll. April New York Questionnaire
Residents: n=2,521, MOE +/- 2.0% Registered Voters: n=1,987, MOE +/- 2.2% NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll New York Questionnaire Potential Republican Electorate: n=477, MOE +/- 4.5% Likely Republican Primary
More informationMarist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: McClatchy-Marist Poll* Clinton Leads Sanders by 22
More informationTHE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1
THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1 Lauren D. Appelbaum UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Ben Zipperer University
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Last updated December 7, 2017
Frequently Asked Questions Last updated December 7, 2017 1. How will the new voting process work? Every registered voter will receive a ballot in the mail one month before the election. Voters will have
More informationCALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFICERS ASSOCIATION B Y L A W S
CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFICERS ASSOCIATION B Y L A W S Amended June 12, 2014 AMENDMENTS October 1997 Amended, restated and renumbered Amended, June 1999 Amended, January 2000 Amended, July 9, 2002 Amended,
More informationBYLAWS LOCAL UNION NO INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD ELECTRICAL WORKERS VACAVILLE, CALIFORNIA. APPROVED: January 30, 2015
BYLAWS OF LOCAL UNION NO. 1245 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS VACAVILLE, CALIFORNIA APPROVED: January 30, 2015 ORDER OF BUSINESS 1. Opening. 2. Roll Call of Officers and Reading of Minutes.
More informationTHE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact
Field Research Corporation 601 California St., Ste 900, San Francisco, CA 94108-2814 (415) 392-5763 FAX: (415) 434-2541 field.com/fieldpollonline THE FIELD POLL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY
More information