Sect 13.2 Flaws of Voting Methods

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Sect 13.2 Flaws of Voting Methods"

Transcription

1 218 Sect 13.2 Flaws of Voting Methods From an example the previous section, we had 48 sports writers rank the top four Spurs players of all time. Below is the preference table. Number of votes st choice TD GG DR GG 2 nd choice DR DR GG TD 3 rd choice GG TD TD DR 4 th choice TP TP TP TP As we saw in the last section, determining who is the top Spurs player of all time depends upon which voting method is employed: 1) The Plurality Method: Tim Duncan 2) The Borda Count Method: David Robinson 3) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method: George Gervin 4) The Pairwise Comparison Method: David Robinson The question arises as to which method is the most democratic and fair. In this section, we will look at the four criteria that a voting method should meet for the voting system to be fair. This is known as the fairness criteria: Fairness Criteria 1) The Majority 2) The Head-to-Head 3) The Monotonicity, and 4) The Irrelevant Alternatives Objective #1 Understanding the majority criterion. Most people believe that if a candidate receives more than half of the first place votes, the candidate should win the election. This is known as the majority criterion. This is different from the plurality method where the candidate that received the most first place votes is the winner. Just because a candidate receives the most first place votes does not mean he or she received more than half of the first place votes. Tim Duncan is a example of that for the last section. He had the most first place votes (20) so the plurality method said he was the winner, but he did not receive more than half of the first place votes (25 or higher).

2 The Majority If the candidate receives a majority of first-place votes in an election, then that candidate should win the election. Find the following: Ex. 1 Fifty-two tech reviewers were asked to rank the quality of cell phones by the brands Apple (A), Google (G), Moto (M), and Samsung (S). The results are displayed in the preference table below. Number of votes st choice A G S M G 2 nd choice G S G S S 3 rd choice S M M G A 4 th choice M A A A M a) Which brand has the majority of the vote? b) Which brand is the best brand using the Borda count method? c) Does the Borda count method for this problem the majority criterion? Solution: a) Apple has 27 first-place votes which is more than half of 52 votes, so it has received the majority of the first-place votes. b) Since there are four choices, each first-place vote is worth four points, each second-place vote is worth 3 points, each third-place vote is worth 2 points, and each last place vote is worth 1 point. 219 Number of votes st choice A: 4 27 = 108 G: 4 18 = 72 S: 4 4 = 16 M: 4 2 = 8 G: 4 1 = 4 2 nd choice G: 3 27 = 81 S: 3 18 = 54 G: 3 4 = 12 S: 3 2 = 6 S: 3 1 = 3 3 rd choice S: 2 27 = 54 M: 2 18 = 36 M: 2 4 = 8 G: 2 2 = 4 A: 2 1 = 2 4 th choice M: 1 27 = 27 A: 1 18 = 18 A: 1 4 = 4 A: 1 2 = 2 M: 1 1 = 1 Now total the points for each brand separately. Apple: = 134 Google: = 173 Moto: = 80 Samsung: = 133

3 So, by the Borda count method, Google is the winner since it has the most points. c) No, the Borda count method does not the majority criterion since Apple had the majority of the first-place votes. The Borda count method is the only one that can potentially violate the majority criterion. The plurality method, plurality-with-elimination method, and the pairwise comparison method will never violate the majority criterion. 220 Objective #2: Understanding the Head-to-Head. If one candidate is favored by the voters when compared to each of the other candidates, then most people feel that the candidate should win the election. This is known as the head-to-head criterion. Head-to-Head If a candidate is favored when compared separately (head-to-head) with every other candidate, then that candidate should win the election. Find the following: Ex. 2 Sixty frequent flyers were asked to rank in order the airlines they like the most among American Airline (A), Delta Airlines (D), and Southwest Airlines (S). The results are displayed below. Number of votes st choice A S D S D 2 nd choice D D A A S 3 rd choice S A S D A a) Which airline is preferred over the others using the head-to-head comparison? b) Which airline wins using the plurality method? c) Does the plurality method for this problem the head-to-head criterion? Solution: a) Since we have four candidates, we will need to do 3 C 2 = 3 comparisons. The comparisons are A vs. D, A vs. S, and D vs. S

4 A vs. D Number of votes st choice A D D 2 nd choice D D A A 3 rd choice A D A = 27 prefer American while = 33 prefer Delta, so Delta gets 1 point. 221 A vs. S Number of votes st choice A S S 2 nd choice A A S 3 rd choice S A S A = 28 prefer American while = 32 prefer Southwest, so Southwest gets 1 point. D vs. S Number of votes st choice S D S D 2 nd choice D D S 3 rd choice S S D = 35 prefer Delta while = 25 prefer Southwest, so Delta gets 1 point. Notice that Delta is preferred over the other two airlines using the head-to head comparison. b) We only need to examine the first choice row of the table: Number of votes st choice A S D S D 1 st place votes for American: 18 1 st place votes for Delta: = 17 1 st place votes for Southwest: = 25 Since Southwest Airlines has the most first place votes, then Southwest is the winner. c) No, the plurality method does not the head-to-head criterion since Southwest was not preferred over the other two in the head-to-head comparison.

5 The pairwise comparison method is the only voting method that does not have the potential to violate the head-to-head criterion. The other three methods the plurality method, the Borda count method, and the pluralitywith-elimination method have the potential to violate the head-to-head criterion. 222 Objective #3: Understanding the Monotonicity. In the first round of an election, sometimes a preliminary election or straw vote is taken where the votes do not count. This is done to measure the voter's intentions. Generally, it is believe that if a candidate wins the first election and then gains additional support without losing any of the original support, then the candidate should win the second election. This criterion is called the monotonicity criterion. The Monotonicity If a candidate wins an election and, in reelection, the only changes are changes that favor the candidate, then the candidate should win the reelection. Find the following: Ex. 3 Eighty-seven participants in a focus group are asked to rank their preferences among the networks ABC, CBS, and NBC at the beginning of the focus group and at the end of the focus group. The results are displayed below. Beginning of the focus group: Number of votes st choice NBC CBS ABC ABC 2 nd choice ABC NBC CBS NBC 3 rd choice CBS ABC NBC CBS End of the focus group: Number of votes st choice NBC CBS ABC ABC 2 nd choice ABC NBC CBS NBC 3 rd choice CBS ABC NBC CBS

6 223 a) Use the plurality-with-elimination to determine which network won the voting at the beginning of the focus group. b) Use the plurality-with-elimination to determine which network won the voting at the end of the focus group. c) Does this violate the montonicity criterion. Solution: a) Since there were a total of 87 ballots, a network will need 44 first place votes in order to have a majority. Number of votes st choice NBC CBS ABC ABC 2 nd choice ABC NBC CBS NBC 3 rd choice CBS ABC NBC CBS The number of first place votes are: 1 st place votes for ABC: = 33 1 st place votes for CBS: 24 1 st place votes for NBC: 30 Since none of the networks have a majority, eliminate the network with the fewest first place votes which would be CBS. Number of votes st choice NBC NBC ABC ABC 2 nd choice ABC ABC NBC NBC The number of first place votes are: 1 st place votes for ABC: = 33 1 st place votes for NBC: = 54 Since NBC has the majority of the first place votes, then NBC is the winner. b) Since there were a total of 87 ballots, a network will need 44 first place votes in order to have a majority. Number of votes st choice NBC CBS ABC ABC 2 nd choice ABC NBC CBS NBC 3 rd choice CBS ABC NBC CBS The number of first place votes are:

7 1 st place votes for ABC: = 22 1 st place votes for CBS: 24 1 st place votes for NBC: 41 Since none of the networks have a majority, eliminate the network with the fewest first place votes which would be ABC. Number of votes st choice NBC CBS CBS NBC 2 nd choice CBS NBC NBC CBS The number of first place votes are: 1 st place votes for CBS: = 45 1 st place votes for NBC: = 42 Since CBS has the majority of the first place votes, then CBS is the winner. 224 c) All that changed between the vote at the beginning of the focus group and the vote the end of the focus group was that 11 of the 12 voters in the last column switched their ballots to the first column. NBC won the first election and then picked additional support from the eleven voters that switched to the first column. Since NBC lost the second election, this violates the monotonicity criterion. The plurality method is the only voting method that does not have the potential to violate the monotonicity criterion. The other three methods the Borda count method, the plurality-with-elimination method, and pairwise comparison method have the potential to violate the head-to-head criterion. Objective #4: Understanding the Irrelevant Alternatives. Suppose a candidate wins the election and then one or more of the other candidates drops out and a recount is done. Most people would expect that the previous winner should still win the election. This is know as the irrelevant alternatives criterion. Irrelevant Alternatives If a candidate wins an election and, in a recount, the only changes are that one or more of the other candidates are removed from the ballot, then the previous winning candidate should still win the election.

8 Find the following: Ex. 4 Four candidates, Cruz (C), Jones (J), Ortega (O), and Wentworth (W), are running for mayor of Tuna, Texas. The election results are displayed below. 1 st choice C W O O 2 nd choice J J C C 3 rd choice W O W J 4 th choice O C J W 225 a) Use the pairwise comparison method to determine the winner. b) Prior to the announcement of the results, both Jones and Wentworth are forced to withdraw due to a major scandal. Use the pairwise comparison method to determine the winner. c) Does this violate the irrelevant alternatives criterion? Solution: a) Since we have four candidates, we will need to do 4 C 2 = 6 comparisons. The comparisons are C vs. J, C vs. O, C vs. W, J vs. O, J vs. W, and O vs. W. C vs. J 1 st choice C 2 nd choice J J C C 3 rd choice J 4 th choice C J = 858 people prefer Cruz and 330 people prefer Jones, so Cruz gets 1 point. C vs. O 1 st choice C O O 2 nd choice C C 3 rd choice O 4 th choice O C 528 people prefer Cruz and = 660 people prefer Ortega, so Ortega gets 1 point.

9 C vs. W 1 st choice C W 2 nd choice C C 3 rd choice W W 4 th choice C W = 858 people prefer Cruz and 330 people prefer Wentworth, so Cruz gets 1 point. J vs. O 1 st choice O O 2 nd choice J J 3 rd choice O J 4 th choice O J = 858 people prefer Jones and = 330 people prefer Ortega, so Jones gets 1 point. J vs. W 1 st choice W 2 nd choice J J 3 rd choice W W J 4 th choice J W = 594 people prefer Jones and = 594 prefer Wentworth so each gets ½ of a point. O vs. W 1 st choice W O O 2 nd choice 3 rd choice W O W 4 th choice O W = 330 people prefer Ortega and = 858 people prefer Wentworth, so Wentworth gets 1 point. Total points: Points for Cruz: = 2 Points for Jones: 1 + ½ = 1½ Points for Ortega: 1 Points for Wentworth: 1 + ½ = 1½ Since Cruz has the most points, Cruz is the winner. 226

10 227 b) Since both Jones and Wentworth are forced to withdraw due to a major scandal, then Cruz and Ortega are the only two candidates left: 1 st choice C O O O 2 nd choice O C C C Since we have two candidates, we will need to do 2 C 2 = 1 comparison. The comparison is C vs. O. C vs. O 1 st choice C O O O 2 nd choice O C C C 528 people prefer Cruz and = 660 people prefer Ortega, so Ortega gets 1 point. Total points: Points for Cruz: 0 Points for Ortega: 1 Since Ortega has the most points, Ortega is the winner. c) Cruz was the winner in the first election result. Since both Jones and Wentworth were not winners, their removal made Ortega the winner. This violates the irrevelant alternatives criterion. All four of the voting methods the plurality method, the Borda count method, the plurality-with-elimination method, and pairwise comparison method may violate the irrevelant alternatives criterion. Objective #5: Understanding Arrow's Impossibility Theorem. For an election to truly be democratic and fair, it must each of the four fairness criteria majority criterion, head-to-head criterion, monotonicity criterion, and irrevelant alternatives criterion. Below is a summary of each of the four fairness criteria:

11 228 Majority Head-to-Head Monotonicity Irrelevant Alternatives Description If the candidate receives a majority of first-place votes in an election, then that candidate should win the election. If a candidate is favored when compared separately (head-to-head) with every other candidate, then that candidate should win the election. If a candidate wins an election and, in reelection, the only changes are changes that favor the candidate, then the candidate should win the reelection. If a candidate wins an election and, in a recount, the only changes are that one or more of the other candidates are removed from the ballot, then the previous winning candidate should still win the election. The next table shows which voting methods the criteria. Voting Method Plurality-withelimination Borda count Method Method Always satisfies Fairness Criteria Majority Head-to- Head Monotonicity Irrelevant Alternatives Plurality Method Always satisfies Always satisfies Pairwise Comparison Method Always satisfies Always satisfies None of the voting methods discussed satisfies all of the fairness criteria. In fact, for an election involving more than two candidates, there is no perfectly democratic and fair voting method. This is known as Arrow's Impossibility Theorem. Arrow's Impossibility Theorem It is mathematically impossible for any democratic voting system to each of the four fairness criteria.

The Mathematics of Voting. The Mathematics of Voting

The Mathematics of Voting. The Mathematics of Voting 1.3 The Borda Count Method 1 In the Borda Count Method each place on a ballot is assigned points. In an election with N candidates we give 1 point for last place, 2 points for second from last place, and

More information

Head-to-Head Winner. To decide if a Head-to-Head winner exists: Every candidate is matched on a one-on-one basis with every other candidate.

Head-to-Head Winner. To decide if a Head-to-Head winner exists: Every candidate is matched on a one-on-one basis with every other candidate. Head-to-Head Winner A candidate is a Head-to-Head winner if he or she beats all other candidates by majority rule when they meet head-to-head (one-on-one). To decide if a Head-to-Head winner exists: Every

More information

Fairness Criteria. Majority Criterion: If a candidate receives a majority of the first place votes, that candidate should win the election.

Fairness Criteria. Majority Criterion: If a candidate receives a majority of the first place votes, that candidate should win the election. Fairness Criteria Majority Criterion: If a candidate receives a majority of the first place votes, that candidate should win the election. The plurality, plurality-with-elimination, and pairwise comparisons

More information

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods What You Will Learn Plurality Method Borda Count Method Plurality with Elimination Pairwise Comparison Method Tie Breaking 15.1-2 Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society President

More information

Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

Arrow s Impossibility Theorem Arrow s Impossibility Theorem Some announcements Final reflections due on Monday. You now have all of the methods and so you can begin analyzing the results of your election. Today s Goals We will discuss

More information

1.6 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

1.6 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem 1.6 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem Some announcements Homework #2: Text (pages 33-35) 51, 56-60, 61, 65, 71-75 (this is posted on Sakai) For Monday, read Chapter 2 (pages 36-57) Today s Goals We will discuss

More information

Chapter 1 Practice Test Questions

Chapter 1 Practice Test Questions 0728 Finite Math Chapter 1 Practice Test Questions VOCABULARY. On the exam, be prepared to match the correct definition to the following terms: 1) Voting Elements: Single-choice ballot, preference ballot,

More information

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods INB Table of Contents Date Topic Page # February 24, 2014 Test #3 Practice Test 38 February 24, 2014 Test #3 Practice Test Workspace 39 March 10, 2014 Test #3 40 March 10, 2014

More information

Measuring Fairness. Paul Koester () MA 111, Voting Theory September 7, / 25

Measuring Fairness. Paul Koester () MA 111, Voting Theory September 7, / 25 Measuring Fairness We ve seen FOUR methods for tallying votes: Plurality Borda Count Pairwise Comparisons Plurality with Elimination Are these methods reasonable? Are these methods fair? Today we study

More information

Voting Criteria: Majority Criterion Condorcet Criterion Monotonicity Criterion Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion

Voting Criteria: Majority Criterion Condorcet Criterion Monotonicity Criterion Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion We have discussed: Voting Theory Arrow s Impossibility Theorem Voting Methods: Plurality Borda Count Plurality with Elimination Pairwise Comparisons Voting Criteria: Majority Criterion Condorcet Criterion

More information

Fairness Criteria. Review: Election Methods

Fairness Criteria. Review: Election Methods Review: Election Methods Plurality method: the candidate with a plurality of votes wins. Plurality-with-elimination method (Instant runoff): Eliminate the candidate with the fewest first place votes. Keep

More information

The Impossibilities of Voting

The Impossibilities of Voting The Impossibilities of Voting Introduction Majority Criterion Condorcet Criterion Monotonicity Criterion Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion Arrow s Impossibility Theorem 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide

More information

Introduction: The Mathematics of Voting

Introduction: The Mathematics of Voting VOTING METHODS 1 Introduction: The Mathematics of Voting Content: Preference Ballots and Preference Schedules Voting methods including, 1). The Plurality Method 2). The Borda Count Method 3). The Plurality-with-Elimination

More information

Math116Chap1VotingPart2.notebook January 12, Part II. Other Methods of Voting and Other "Fairness Criteria"

Math116Chap1VotingPart2.notebook January 12, Part II. Other Methods of Voting and Other Fairness Criteria Part II Other Methods of Voting and Other "Fairness Criteria" Plurality with Elimination Method Round 1. Count the first place votes for each candidate, just as you would in the plurality method. If a

More information

In this lecture we will cover the following voting methods and fairness criterion.

In this lecture we will cover the following voting methods and fairness criterion. In this lecture we will cover the following voting methods and fairness criterion. Borda Count Method Plurality-with-Elimination Method Monotonicity Criterion 1 Borda Count Method In the Borda Count Method

More information

Write all responses on separate paper. Use complete sentences, charts and diagrams, as appropriate.

Write all responses on separate paper. Use complete sentences, charts and diagrams, as appropriate. Math 13 HW 5 Chapter 9 Write all responses on separate paper. Use complete sentences, charts and diagrams, as appropriate. 1. Explain why majority rule is not a good way to choose between four alternatives.

More information

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. Chapter 1 Review SHORT ANSWER. Answer each question. Circle your final answer. Show all work. Determine whether any of the listed candidates has a majority. 1) Four candidates running for congress receive

More information

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued 7 March 2014 Voting III 7 March 2014 1/27 Last Time We ve discussed several voting systems and conditions which may or may not be satisfied by a system.

More information

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan Lesson Plan For All Practical Purposes An Introduction to Social Choice Majority Rule and Condorcet s Method Mathematical Literacy in Today s World, 9th ed. Other Voting Systems for Three or More Candidates

More information

Today s plan: Section : Plurality with Elimination Method and a second Fairness Criterion: The Monotocity Criterion.

Today s plan: Section : Plurality with Elimination Method and a second Fairness Criterion: The Monotocity Criterion. 1 Today s plan: Section 1.2.4. : Plurality with Elimination Method and a second Fairness Criterion: The Monotocity Criterion. 2 Plurality with Elimination is a third voting method. It is more complicated

More information

12.2 Defects in Voting Methods

12.2 Defects in Voting Methods 12.2 Defects in Voting Methods Recall the different Voting Methods: 1. Plurality - one vote to one candidate, the others get nothing The remaining three use a preference ballot, where all candidates are

More information

The Mathematics of Voting

The Mathematics of Voting The Mathematics of Voting Voting Methods Summary Last time, we considered elections for Math Club President from among four candidates: Alisha (A), Boris (B), Carmen (C), and Dave (D). All 37 voters submitted

More information

The search for a perfect voting system. MATH 105: Contemporary Mathematics. University of Louisville. October 31, 2017

The search for a perfect voting system. MATH 105: Contemporary Mathematics. University of Louisville. October 31, 2017 The search for a perfect voting system MATH 105: Contemporary Mathematics University of Louisville October 31, 2017 Review of Fairness Criteria Fairness Criteria 2 / 14 We ve seen three fairness criteria

More information

n(n 1) 2 C = total population total number of seats amount of increase original amount

n(n 1) 2 C = total population total number of seats amount of increase original amount MTH 110 Quiz 2 Review Spring 2018 Quiz 2 will cover Chapter 13 and Section 11.1. Justify all answers with neat and organized work. Clearly indicate your answers. The following formulas may or may not be

More information

Intro to Contemporary Math

Intro to Contemporary Math Intro to Contemporary Math Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criteria Nicholas Nguyen nicholas.nguyen@uky.edu Department of Mathematics UK Agenda Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criteria

More information

Mathematical Thinking. Chapter 9 Voting Systems

Mathematical Thinking. Chapter 9 Voting Systems Mathematical Thinking Chapter 9 Voting Systems Voting Systems A voting system is a rule for transforming a set of individual preferences into a single group decision. What are the desirable properties

More information

Elections with Only 2 Alternatives

Elections with Only 2 Alternatives Math 203: Chapter 12: Voting Systems and Drawbacks: How do we decide the best voting system? Elections with Only 2 Alternatives What is an individual preference list? Majority Rules: Pick 1 of 2 candidates

More information

Section 3: The Borda Count Method. Example 4: Using the preference schedule from Example 3, identify the Borda candidate.

Section 3: The Borda Count Method. Example 4: Using the preference schedule from Example 3, identify the Borda candidate. Chapter 1: The Mathematics of Voting Section 3: The Borda Count Method Thursday, January 19, 2012 The Borda Count Method In an election using the Borda Count Method, the candidate with the most points

More information

Exercises For DATA AND DECISIONS. Part I Voting

Exercises For DATA AND DECISIONS. Part I Voting Exercises For DATA AND DECISIONS Part I Voting September 13, 2016 Exercise 1 Suppose that an election has candidates A, B, C, D and E. There are 7 voters, who submit the following ranked ballots: 2 1 1

More information

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued. Voting II 1/27

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued. Voting II 1/27 Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued Voting II 1/27 Last Time Last time we discussed some elections and some issues with plurality voting. We started to discuss another voting system, the Borda

More information

The actual midterm will probably not be multiple choice. You should also study your notes, the textbook, and the homework.

The actual midterm will probably not be multiple choice. You should also study your notes, the textbook, and the homework. Math 101 Practice First Midterm The actual midterm will probably not be multiple choice. You should also study your notes, the textbook, and the homework. Answers are on the last page. MULTIPLE CHOICE.

More information

Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Kenneth Arrow. Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Strategically vulnerable

Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Kenneth Arrow. Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Strategically vulnerable Outline for today Stat155 Game Theory Lecture 26: More Voting. Peter Bartlett December 1, 2016 1 / 31 2 / 31 Recall: Voting and Ranking Recall: Properties of ranking rules Assumptions There is a set Γ

More information

The Mathematics of Voting

The Mathematics of Voting Math 165 Winston Salem, NC 28 October 2010 Voting for 2 candidates Today, we talk about voting, which may not seem mathematical. President of the Math TA s Let s say there s an election which has just

More information

Make the Math Club Great Again! The Mathematics of Democratic Voting

Make the Math Club Great Again! The Mathematics of Democratic Voting Make the Math Club Great Again! The Mathematics of Democratic Voting Darci L. Kracht Kent State University Undergraduate Mathematics Club April 14, 2016 How do you become Math Club King, I mean, President?

More information

Desirable properties of social choice procedures. We now outline a number of properties that are desirable for these social choice procedures:

Desirable properties of social choice procedures. We now outline a number of properties that are desirable for these social choice procedures: Desirable properties of social choice procedures We now outline a number of properties that are desirable for these social choice procedures: 1. Pareto [named for noted economist Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923)]

More information

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods What You Will Learn Plurality Method Borda Count Method Plurality with Elimination Pairwise Comparison Method Tie Breaking 15.1-2 Example 2: Voting for the Honor Society President

More information

Voting rules: (Dixit and Skeath, ch 14) Recall parkland provision decision:

Voting rules: (Dixit and Skeath, ch 14) Recall parkland provision decision: rules: (Dixit and Skeath, ch 14) Recall parkland provision decision: Assume - n=10; - total cost of proposed parkland=38; - if provided, each pays equal share = 3.8 - there are two groups of individuals

More information

Josh Engwer (TTU) Voting Methods 15 July / 49

Josh Engwer (TTU) Voting Methods 15 July / 49 Voting Methods Contemporary Math Josh Engwer TTU 15 July 2015 Josh Engwer (TTU) Voting Methods 15 July 2015 1 / 49 Introduction In free societies, citizens vote for politicians whose values & opinions

More information

Social Choice: The Impossible Dream. Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them.

Social Choice: The Impossible Dream. Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them. Chapter Objectives Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them. Analyze and interpret preference list ballots. Explain three desired properties of Majority Rule. Explain May s theorem.

More information

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible.

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible. Voting Theory 1 Voting Theory In many decision making situations, it is necessary to gather the group consensus. This happens when a group of friends decides which movie to watch, when a company decides

More information

Voting Criteria April

Voting Criteria April Voting Criteria 21-301 2018 30 April 1 Evaluating voting methods In the last session, we learned about different voting methods. In this session, we will focus on the criteria we use to evaluate whether

More information

Practice TEST: Chapter 14

Practice TEST: Chapter 14 TOPICS Practice TEST: Chapter 14 Name: Period: Date: SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Use the given information to answer the question.

More information

9.3 Other Voting Systems for Three or More Candidates

9.3 Other Voting Systems for Three or More Candidates 9.3 Other Voting Systems for Three or More Candidates With three or more candidates, there are several additional procedures that seem to give reasonable ways to choose a winner. If we look closely at

More information

Voting Methods

Voting Methods 1.3-1.5 Voting Methods Some announcements Homework #1: Text (pages 28-33) 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 19, 22, 29, 32, 38, 42, 50, 51, 56-60, 61, 65 (this is posted on Sakai) Math Center study sessions with Katie

More information

Math for Liberal Arts MAT 110: Chapter 12 Notes

Math for Liberal Arts MAT 110: Chapter 12 Notes Math for Liberal Arts MAT 110: Chapter 12 Notes Voting Methods David J. Gisch Voting: Does the Majority Always Rule? Choosing a Winner In elections with more then 2 candidates, there are several acceptable

More information

Voting Definitions and Theorems Spring Dr. Martin Montgomery Office: POT 761

Voting Definitions and Theorems Spring Dr. Martin Montgomery Office: POT 761 Voting Definitions and Theorems Spring 2014 Dr. Martin Montgomery Office: POT 761 http://www.ms.uky.edu/~martinm/m111 Voting Method: Plurality Definition (The Plurality Method of Voting) For each ballot,

More information

Social welfare functions

Social welfare functions Social welfare functions We have defined a social choice function as a procedure that determines for each possible profile (set of preference ballots) of the voters the winner or set of winners for the

More information

Chapter 10. The Manipulability of Voting Systems. For All Practical Purposes: Effective Teaching. Chapter Briefing

Chapter 10. The Manipulability of Voting Systems. For All Practical Purposes: Effective Teaching. Chapter Briefing Chapter 10 The Manipulability of Voting Systems For All Practical Purposes: Effective Teaching As a teaching assistant, you most likely will administer and proctor many exams. Although it is tempting to

More information

Name Date I. Consider the preference schedule in an election with 5 candidates.

Name Date I. Consider the preference schedule in an election with 5 candidates. Name Date I. Consider the preference schedule in an election with 5 candidates. 1. How many voters voted in this election? 2. How many votes are needed for a majority (more than 50% of the vote)? 3. How

More information

Math Circle Voting Methods Practice. March 31, 2013

Math Circle Voting Methods Practice. March 31, 2013 Voting Methods Practice 1) Three students are running for class vice president: Chad, Courtney and Gwyn. Each student ranked the candidates in order of preference. The chart below shows the results of

More information

SOCIAL CHOICES (Voting Methods) THE PROBLEM. Social Choice and Voting. Terminologies

SOCIAL CHOICES (Voting Methods) THE PROBLEM. Social Choice and Voting. Terminologies SOCIAL CHOICES (Voting Methods) THE PROBLEM In a society, decisions are made by its members in order to come up with a situation that benefits the most. What is the best voting method of arriving at a

More information

answers to some of the sample exercises : Public Choice

answers to some of the sample exercises : Public Choice answers to some of the sample exercises : Public Choice Ques 1 The following table lists the way that 5 different voters rank five different alternatives. Is there a Condorcet winner under pairwise majority

More information

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan Lesson Plan For ll Practical Purposes Voting and Social hoice Majority Rule and ondorcet s Method Mathematical Literacy in Today s World, 7th ed. Other Voting Systems for Three or More andidates Plurality

More information

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible.

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible. Voting Theory 35 Voting Theory In many decision making situations, it is necessary to gather the group consensus. This happens when a group of friends decides which movie to watch, when a company decides

More information

Grade 6 Math Circles Winter February 27/28 The Mathematics of Voting - Solutions

Grade 6 Math Circles Winter February 27/28 The Mathematics of Voting - Solutions Faculty of Mathematics Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing Grade 6 Math Circles Winter 2018 - February 27/28 The Mathematics of Voting - Solutions Warm-up: Time

More information

: It is mathematically impossible for a democratic voting method to satisfy all of the fairness criteria was proven in 1949.

: It is mathematically impossible for a democratic voting method to satisfy all of the fairness criteria was proven in 1949. Chapter 1 Notes from Voting Theory: the mathematics of the intricacies and subtleties of how voting is done and the votes are counted. In the early 20 th century, social scientists and mathematicians working

More information

Grade 7/8 Math Circles Winter March 6/7/8 The Mathematics of Voting

Grade 7/8 Math Circles Winter March 6/7/8 The Mathematics of Voting Faculty of Mathematics Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing Grade 7/8 Math Circles Winter 2018 - March 6/7/8 The Mathematics of Voting Warm-up: Time to vote! We need

More information

that changes needed to be made when electing their Presidential nominee. Iowa, at the time had a

that changes needed to be made when electing their Presidential nominee. Iowa, at the time had a Part I The Iowa caucuses are perhaps the most important yet mysterious contest in American politics. It all began after the 1968 Democratic National Convention protest, the party decided that changes needed

More information

Majority- more than half of the votes Plurality- the most first place votes. The Majority Criterion

Majority- more than half of the votes Plurality- the most first place votes. The Majority Criterion 1 Notes from 1.21.10 The marching band is deciding which bowl to play at (Rose, Fiesta, Hula, Orange, Sugar). Here is the preference schedule summarizing the ballots. Preference Schedule: Which Bowl? Number

More information

Syllabus update: Now keeping best 3 of 4 tests

Syllabus update: Now keeping best 3 of 4 tests Syllabus update: Now keeping best 3 of 4 tests The answer was 22. Recall order of operations: Parentheses, exponents, multiplication/division, addition/subtraction. PEMDAS Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally

More information

Main idea: Voting systems matter.

Main idea: Voting systems matter. Voting Systems Main idea: Voting systems matter. Electoral College Winner takes all in most states (48/50) (plurality in states) 270/538 electoral votes needed to win (majority) If 270 isn t obtained -

More information

The Mathematics of Elections

The Mathematics of Elections MTH 110 Week 1 hapter 1 Worksheet NME The Mathematics of Elections It s not the voting that s democracy; it s the counting. Tom Stoppard We have elections because we don t all think alike. Since we cannot

More information

2-Candidate Voting Method: Majority Rule

2-Candidate Voting Method: Majority Rule 2-Candidate Voting Method: Majority Rule Definition (2-Candidate Voting Method: Majority Rule) Majority Rule is a form of 2-candidate voting in which the candidate who receives the most votes is the winner

More information

Economics 470 Some Notes on Simple Alternatives to Majority Rule

Economics 470 Some Notes on Simple Alternatives to Majority Rule Economics 470 Some Notes on Simple Alternatives to Majority Rule Some of the voting procedures considered here are not considered as a means of revealing preferences on a public good issue, but as a means

More information

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems. Voting I 1/36

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems. Voting I 1/36 Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems Voting I 1/36 Each even year every member of the house is up for election and about a third of the senate seats are up for grabs. Most people do not realize that there

More information

Many Social Choice Rules

Many Social Choice Rules Many Social Choice Rules 1 Introduction So far, I have mentioned several of the most commonly used social choice rules : pairwise majority rule, plurality, plurality with a single run off, the Borda count.

More information

Voting Fairness Idea: Condorcet Criterion (CO)

Voting Fairness Idea: Condorcet Criterion (CO) Voting Fairness Idea: ondorcet riterion (O) Definition (Voting Fairness Idea: ondorcet riterion (O)) voting system satisfies the ondorcet riterion if the ondorcet andidate always wins. In the ballots below,

More information

Mathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College

Mathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College Mathematics of Voting Systems Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College Arrow s Impossibility Theorem 1) No special treatment of particular voters or candidates 2) Transitivity A>B and B>C implies

More information

The Manipulability of Voting Systems. Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them.

The Manipulability of Voting Systems. Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them. Chapter 10 The Manipulability of Voting Systems Chapter Objectives Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them. Explain what is meant by voting manipulation. Determine if a voter,

More information

Notes for Session 7 Basic Voting Theory and Arrow s Theorem

Notes for Session 7 Basic Voting Theory and Arrow s Theorem Notes for Session 7 Basic Voting Theory and Arrow s Theorem We follow up the Impossibility (Session 6) of pooling expert probabilities, while preserving unanimities in both unconditional and conditional

More information

Math for Liberal Studies

Math for Liberal Studies Math for Liberal Studies There are many more methods for determining the winner of an election with more than two candidates We will only discuss a few more: sequential pairwise voting contingency voting

More information

Rock the Vote or Vote The Rock

Rock the Vote or Vote The Rock Rock the Vote or Vote The Rock Tom Edgar Department of Mathematics University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana October 27, 2008 Graduate Student Seminar Introduction Basic Counting Extended Counting Introduction

More information

VOTING SYSTEMS AND ARROW S THEOREM

VOTING SYSTEMS AND ARROW S THEOREM VOTING SYSTEMS AND ARROW S THEOREM AKHIL MATHEW Abstract. The following is a brief discussion of Arrow s theorem in economics. I wrote it for an economics class in high school. 1. Background Arrow s theorem

More information

Rationality & Social Choice. Dougherty, POLS 8000

Rationality & Social Choice. Dougherty, POLS 8000 Rationality & Social Choice Dougherty, POLS 8000 Social Choice A. Background 1. Social Choice examines how to aggregate individual preferences fairly. a. Voting is an example. b. Think of yourself writing

More information

Presidential Election Democrat Grover Cleveland versus Benjamin Harrison. ************************************ Difference of 100,456

Presidential Election Democrat Grover Cleveland versus Benjamin Harrison. ************************************ Difference of 100,456 Presidential Election 1886 Democrat Grover Cleveland versus Benjamin Harrison Cleveland 5,540,309 Harrison 5,439,853 ************************************ Difference of 100,456 Electoral College Cleveland

More information

Voting Lecture 3: 2-Candidate Voting Spring Morgan Schreffler Office: POT Teaching.

Voting Lecture 3: 2-Candidate Voting Spring Morgan Schreffler Office: POT Teaching. Voting Lecture 3: 2-Candidate Voting Spring 2014 Morgan Schreffler Office: POT 902 http://www.ms.uky.edu/~mschreffler/ Teaching.php 2-Candidate Voting Method: Majority Rule Definition (2-Candidate Voting

More information

Social Choice & Mechanism Design

Social Choice & Mechanism Design Decision Making in Robots and Autonomous Agents Social Choice & Mechanism Design Subramanian Ramamoorthy School of Informatics 2 April, 2013 Introduction Social Choice Our setting: a set of outcomes agents

More information

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics Lecture 6 June 29, 2015 Slides prepared by Iian Smythe for MATH 1340, Summer 2015, at Cornell University 1 Basic criteria A social choice function is anonymous if voters

More information

Voting Methods for Municipal Elections: Propaganda, Field Experiments and what USA voters want from an Election Algorithm

Voting Methods for Municipal Elections: Propaganda, Field Experiments and what USA voters want from an Election Algorithm Voting Methods for Municipal Elections: Propaganda, Field Experiments and what USA voters want from an Election Algorithm Kathryn Lenz, Mathematics and Statistics Department, University of Minnesota Duluth

More information

Computational Social Choice: Spring 2007

Computational Social Choice: Spring 2007 Computational Social Choice: Spring 2007 Ulle Endriss Institute for Logic, Language and Computation University of Amsterdam Ulle Endriss 1 Plan for Today This lecture will be an introduction to voting

More information

(c) 2013 Janice L. Epstein Voting Methods 1

(c) 2013 Janice L. Epstein Voting Methods 1 (c) 2013 Janice L. Epstein Voting Methods 1 Majority Rule: Each voter votes for one candidate. The candidate with the majority of the votes wins. n n + 1 When there are n votes, the majority is + 1 [n

More information

Voting Protocols. Introduction. Social choice: preference aggregation Our settings. Voting protocols are examples of social choice mechanisms

Voting Protocols. Introduction. Social choice: preference aggregation Our settings. Voting protocols are examples of social choice mechanisms Voting Protocols Yiling Chen September 14, 2011 Introduction Social choice: preference aggregation Our settings A set of agents have preferences over a set of alternatives Taking preferences of all agents,

More information

Explaining the Impossible: Kenneth Arrow s Nobel Prize Winning Theorem on Elections

Explaining the Impossible: Kenneth Arrow s Nobel Prize Winning Theorem on Elections Explaining the Impossible: Kenneth Arrow s Nobel Prize Winning Theorem on Elections Dr. Rick Klima Appalachian State University Boone, North Carolina U.S. Presidential Vote Totals, 2000 Candidate Bush

More information

Voting Systems. High School Circle I. June 4, 2017

Voting Systems. High School Circle I. June 4, 2017 Voting Systems High School Circle I June 4, 2017 Today we are going to start our study of voting systems. Put loosely, a voting system takes the preferences of many people, and converted them into a group

More information

Introduction to the Theory of Voting

Introduction to the Theory of Voting November 11, 2015 1 Introduction What is Voting? Motivation 2 Axioms I Anonymity, Neutrality and Pareto Property Issues 3 Voting Rules I Condorcet Extensions and Scoring Rules 4 Axioms II Reinforcement

More information

The Math of Rational Choice - Math 100 Spring 2015

The Math of Rational Choice - Math 100 Spring 2015 The Math of Rational Choice - Math 100 Spring 2015 Mathematics can be used to understand many aspects of decision-making in everyday life, such as: 1. Voting (a) Choosing a restaurant (b) Electing a leader

More information

Introduction to Theory of Voting. Chapter 2 of Computational Social Choice by William Zwicker

Introduction to Theory of Voting. Chapter 2 of Computational Social Choice by William Zwicker Introduction to Theory of Voting Chapter 2 of Computational Social Choice by William Zwicker If we assume Introduction 1. every two voters play equivalent roles in our voting rule 2. every two alternatives

More information

Lecture 16: Voting systems

Lecture 16: Voting systems Lecture 16: Voting systems Economics 336 Economics 336 (Toronto) Lecture 16: Voting systems 1 / 18 Introduction Last lecture we looked at the basic theory of majority voting: instability in voting: Condorcet

More information

MATH4999 Capstone Projects in Mathematics and Economics Topic 3 Voting methods and social choice theory

MATH4999 Capstone Projects in Mathematics and Economics Topic 3 Voting methods and social choice theory MATH4999 Capstone Projects in Mathematics and Economics Topic 3 Voting methods and social choice theory 3.1 Social choice procedures Plurality voting Borda count Elimination procedures Sequential pairwise

More information

(67686) Mathematical Foundations of AI June 18, Lecture 6

(67686) Mathematical Foundations of AI June 18, Lecture 6 (67686) Mathematical Foundations of AI June 18, 2008 Lecturer: Ariel D. Procaccia Lecture 6 Scribe: Ezra Resnick & Ariel Imber 1 Introduction: Social choice theory Thus far in the course, we have dealt

More information

Mathematics and Social Choice Theory. Topic 4 Voting methods with more than 2 alternatives. 4.1 Social choice procedures

Mathematics and Social Choice Theory. Topic 4 Voting methods with more than 2 alternatives. 4.1 Social choice procedures Mathematics and Social Choice Theory Topic 4 Voting methods with more than 2 alternatives 4.1 Social choice procedures 4.2 Analysis of voting methods 4.3 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem 4.4 Cumulative voting

More information

CS 886: Multiagent Systems. Fall 2016 Kate Larson

CS 886: Multiagent Systems. Fall 2016 Kate Larson CS 886: Multiagent Systems Fall 2016 Kate Larson Multiagent Systems We will study the mathematical and computational foundations of multiagent systems, with a focus on the analysis of systems where agents

More information

Section 7.1: Voting Systems. Plurality Method The candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is the winner.

Section 7.1: Voting Systems. Plurality Method The candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is the winner. Section 7.1: Voting Systems Plurality Method The candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is the winner. Borda Count Method Each voter s last choice receives one point, each voter s second-to-last

More information

How should we count the votes?

How should we count the votes? How should we count the votes? Bruce P. Conrad January 16, 2008 Were the Iowa caucuses undemocratic? Many politicians, pundits, and reporters thought so in the weeks leading up to the January 3, 2008 event.

More information

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems 3 March 2014 Voting I 3 March 2014 1/27 In 2014 every member of the house is up for election and about a third of the senate seats will be up for grabs. Most people

More information

The mathematics of voting, power, and sharing Part 1

The mathematics of voting, power, and sharing Part 1 The mathematics of voting, power, and sharing Part 1 Voting systems A voting system or a voting scheme is a way for a group of people to select one from among several possibilities. If there are only two

More information

Chapter 4: Voting and Social Choice.

Chapter 4: Voting and Social Choice. Chapter 4: Voting and Social Choice. Topics: Ordinal Welfarism Condorcet and Borda: 2 alternatives for majority voting Voting over Resource Allocation Single-Peaked Preferences Intermediate Preferences

More information

Voting. Suppose that the outcome is determined by the mean of all voter s positions.

Voting. Suppose that the outcome is determined by the mean of all voter s positions. Voting Suppose that the voters are voting on a single-dimensional issue. (Say 0 is extreme left and 100 is extreme right for example.) Each voter has a favorite point on the spectrum and the closer the

More information

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems. Voting I 1/31

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems. Voting I 1/31 Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems Voting I 1/31 In 2014 every member of the house is up for election and about a third of the senate seats will be up for grabs. Most people do not realize that there

More information

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream The application of mathematics to the study of human beings their behavior, values, interactions, conflicts, and methods of making decisions is generally

More information