FY14 MEP Questions & Answers, v.1 Office of Migrant Education CHILD ELIGIBILITY
|
|
- Hollie Hunt
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHILD ELIGIBILITY Q. Please provide clarification on the following two fishing work scenarios in terms of MEP eligibility: 1. During the first week of May, a father and his three sons (ages 12, 14, and 16) leave Florida on a Friday afternoon and travel by shrimp boat to Alabama. The trip to reach their destination is five hours by way of the Intracoastal Waterway. The father and his three sons shrimp Friday night, Saturday, and Sunday. The boys help their father shrimp, sort the shrimp, and pack the shrimp on ice to prepare to sell to the seafood packing house. Early Monday morning the family returns to Pensacola. The boys then return to school. This is repeated several times during the month. Do these moves constitute a change in residence? 2. A shrimper and his wife are divorcing. He must pay his wife child support for his two daughters, ages 9 and 13. The mother and the two daughters travel from Florida to Alabama to be present when the shrimp boat docks in order for the mother to collect the money for child support. The mother helps sort the seafood when the boat docks. Are the children eligible for the MEP? A. In Scenario #1, the question is whether the weekend moves constitute a change in residence, which as you know, is part of the Migrant Education Program s (MEP s) regulatory definition of a qualifying move [see 34 CFR section (g)]. OME does not establish a minimum duration for qualifying moves because there are some short duration moves that qualify and others that do not. Instead, we define the term residence in the MEP Guidance as a place where one lives and not just visits and say that generally, a person who goes to a new place to seek or obtain work, or because the person cannot afford to stay in his or her current location, is leaving the place where he or she currently lives and is going to a new place to live and thus, has changed from one residence to another residence (or changed residence) With respect to moves of such short duration (e.g., less than a week) that an independent reviewer might question whether the worker changed residence, we encourage SEAs to establish a policy for determining and documenting when and why these moves qualify for the MEP. This approach sets a uniform policy statewide in accordance with the needs of your state s migratory population, and avoids the need to make individual determinations of what constitutes a change in residence. In developing this policy, please visit the MEP Guidance, Chapter II, Section D, Q&As D3-D7 and D23-D25. In Scenario #2, based on the information provided, OME would not qualify these children for the MEP. According to program regulations [see 34 CFR (c)], one of the qualifying factors for our program is that one of the purposes of the move is to seek or obtain qualifying work. According to the regulations a worker who moves with any type of work in mind would qualify as long as the qualifying work was obtained soon after the move. However, in the scenario Page 1 of 6
2 described above, it does not appear as though employment was even one purpose of the move. Rather, the mother traveled to Alabama to collect child support. While some might ask whether the father could be considered the qualifying worker, we do not believe this is possible, because it does not appear as though the children moved to join their father. Q. A young man (14 years old) from Guatemala travels to Yakima, WA with the intent to seek or obtain qualifying work. Before he is able to reach WA, the youth is detained in Arizona by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and is sent to a detainment center. The youth is given the option to be either deported back to Guatemala or relocated with a relative in the U.S. He chooses the second option and is relocated to Florida to live with an uncle and as a condition he must enroll in school. Is this a qualifying move for which the child may be considered eligible for the MEP? A. To determine whether the youth in question might qualify for the MEP, recruiters must determine whether a qualifying move occurred. Per the MEP regulations, a move qualifies if it is a change from one residence to another residence due to economic necessity and if one of the purposes of the move is to seek or obtain qualifying work [see 34 CFR sections (c) and (g)]. In the scenario you described, the youth moved from one residence in Guatemala to another residence in Florida. Although the youth intended to move from Guatemala to Washington to do qualifying work, he did not complete the qualifying move, and therefore, we cannot say that a move to a residence in Washington occurred. The fact that one might question whether the detention center could be a residence would not change our analysis of the situation because he still did not complete the intended move. In order for the move from Guatemala to Florida to be considered qualifying for the purposes of the MEP, one of the reasons for the move must have been to seek or obtain qualifying work [see 34 CFR (c)]. Based on the information presented, we do not believe that one of the purposes of the youth s move from Guatemala to Florida was to seek or obtain qualifying work; rather, he was ordered there by officials of the U.S. Government. Therefore, we do not believe that the youth in the scenario would qualify for the MEP. IDENTIFICATION & RECRUITMENT (ID & R) Q. How many COEs should be sampled for independent re-interviews? What population should the sample be drawn from: children to be included in the Category I Child Count (ages 3-21) or all children currently eligible for the program (ages birth 21)? Is there a more cost-effective way to conduct re-interviews when our population is widely spread across the State? Page 2 of 6
3 A. In response to the first question regarding the number of COEs to include in the independent re-interviews, we clarify that re-interviews are based on a random sample of identified migratory children, not COEs. While the regulations do not specify a sample size, States must ensure that a sufficient number of eligibility determinations in the current year are tested on a statewide basis or within categories associated with identified risk factors [see 34 CFR (b)(2)(ii)]. We recommend that States conduct, on average, 50 re-interviews (i.e., smaller States might conduct fewer than 50 re-interviews, whereas larger States should conduct more than 50 re-interviews), and that re-interviews be conducted on a rolling basis, shortly after the original eligibility determination was made; this is an effort to reduce non-response, and help ensure that the state meets their target number of re-interviews. States should look at their sample size and response rates from prior years in order to determine the best number to include in the sample. See Section III, of the Technical Assistance Guide on Re-interviewing for additional technical assistance regarding prospective re-interviewing. Page 20 addresses non-response specifically. In response to your second question regarding the pool of migratory children from which your sample should be selected, you should limit your focus to those children ages 3-21 who were found eligible in the current year. Therefore, if the State conducts its independent prospective re-interviewing during the performance reporting period, it would sample children ages 3-21 who were recruited (i.e., the date the SEA reviewer signed the COE) between September 1, 2013 and August 30, We emphasize using the recruited date as opposed to the Qualifying Arrival Date (aka the Last Qualifying Move or LQM) because for children who are not identified and recruited soon after their QAD, their QAD and recruitment dates might occur in different performance periods. Please keep in mind that although face-to-face re-interviews are the preferred method and must be conducted unless circumstances make them impractical (e.g., excessive travel costs to interview one or two families who live a significant distance from the areas where the majority of re-interviews will be concentrated), States can adopt an alternative method such as telephone interviewing, if necessary. PROVISION OF SERVICES Q. Is it an allowable use of MEP funds to purchase laptop computers, ipads, and other electronic devices for migrant students to keep indefinitely (including after the child s MEP eligibility ends)? A. OME considers such purchases to be an unallowable use of MEP funds because the MEP would not be able to assure that the devices are used solely for authorized purposes, nor would the MEP be able to maintain effective control over the devices once the students MEP eligibility ends. In accordance with the cost principles that guide Title I, Part C grants to SEAs, in order to be considered allowable, costs must be allocable or chargeable to the MEP, relative to the benefit received [see OMB Circular A-87, now located in 2 CFR, Part 225, Appendix A, section C(3)]. In addition, 80.20(b)(3) of EDGAR, requires grantees and subgrantees to have financial Page 3 of 6
4 management systems that maintain effective control and accountability for all grant and subgrant cash, real and personal property, and other assets. This same provision requires grantees and subgrantees to adequately safeguard all such property and must assure that it is used solely for authorized purposes. If the MEP were to purchase electronic devices (e.g. laptop computers, ipads) for students to keep, it would be extremely difficult to determine the purposes for which they were being used. Moreover, the SEA would have no control over the electronic devices when the students MEP eligibility ends. If the MEP wishes to purchase electronic devices for migrant children to use (rather than to keep ) while they are receiving services from the Program, it might consider the following options: 1. The MEP may purchase computers or mobile computer devices (e.g., laptops or ipads) that it can use year after year to provide instruction/training to migratory students. In this situation, the MEP retains ownership and oversight of the computers and devices while also being able to use the devices for multiple years. 2. The MEP may share the cost of computer and mobile computer device purchases with another program, assuming that each program utilizes the devices for a period of time relative to each program s share of the cost. In this situation, the MEP may opt to share costs with another program because during particular times of the year migrant children may not reside in the state and the MEP could cut costs by allowing another program to use the devices during these times. 3. A loan system may be implemented for MEP-owned computers and mobile computer devices (e.g., laptops or ipads), which would allow students to check out the technology to use at home. The MEP should establish basic procedures for checking in with students about their uses of the devices (e.g., require students to sign a good-faith agreement to use the equipment for specific, academically-related purposes, limit access to certain software or websites which are not academically-related) and for returning the devices at the end of the project or term. The aforementioned options might allow the resources to benefit more students, while still maintaining ownership and oversight by the MEP. You can find more information about the use of MEP funds at: Chapter X discusses MEP fiscal requirements. PERFORMANCE REPORTING Q. How should a migrant child be counted when they reside in one state, and receive Migrant Education Program (MEP) services in a bordering state? The child receives services in the bordering state, where he travels for the day, but does not establish residency. There is no MEP project in the area of the state in which the child lives. Page 4 of 6
5 A: The Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) requires States to report to the Department (via the EDFacts reporting system) the number of eligible migrant children ages 3 through 21 in their State and various data on migrant children who participated in MEP-funded services during the previous performance period. Most relevant to your question are the counts of eligible migrant children (also known as Child Counts I and II) found in section 2.3.1, and the participation data found in sections of the CSPR. States may only include a child in Child Counts I and II (CSPR section 2.3.1), if the child resided in the State for one or more days during the performance period (see section 1303(a)(2)(B) of the statute and Chapter IX, Section B of the MEP Guidance). In regard to the MEP participation data reported in sections of the CSPR, States may report eligible migrant children [as well as formerly eligible migrant children being served under the Continuation of Services (COS) authority] who participated in the State s MEP-funded services during the regular school year, summer/intersession, and performance period. Participating migrant children, according to section of the EDFacts Workbook for SY are children who participate in Migrant Education Programs (MEP) under Title I, Part C, including those served under [the] continuation of services authority. Note that this definition does not include a requirement for migrant children to reside in the State where they receive services; therefore, the State that served the child may count the child under the MEP participation items, even if the child did not reside in the state. All States must ensure that any children they serve with MEP funds meet the definition of migratory child as defined by the statute. For this reason, if a State wishes to serve eligible migrant children who reside in another State, they should first make an independent determination that the children are MEP eligible. To help make this determination they could obtain the COEs for these children from the neighboring State or look for the children s information in MSIX, but the MEP should still conduct their own independent interview with the family. We recommend that MEP staff coordinate with their counterparts in the neighboring State to exchange pertinent information to identify the needs of the migratory children to be served. We also encourage the two State MEPs to collaborate in the provision of services for example, the State in which the child resides might be willing to help pay for an allocable portion of service costs or provide an allocable number of staff members for another State s MEP projects that provide services to their own State s eligible migratory children. If both State MEPs provide services to these children in whole or in part with MEP funds, both States can count these children in the MEP participation date reported in sections of the CSPR. FISCAL REQUIREMENTS Page 5 of 6
6 Q. A MEP subgrantee wants to charge the cost of a workers compensation claim to the MEP, a cost of over $8,000. The LOA is self-funded with regards to workers compensation every worker is covered for workers compensation. Instead of paying monthly premiums, as a self-funded agency, the district pays actual expenses on an employee s injury. A. Like funds available to a school district under any Federal grant program, MEP funds may be charged for a portion of workers compensation claims. However, as explained below, these costs must be charged in ways permitted by applicable cost principles established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Those principles do not permit a school district to charge Federal grant funds for the full amount of the claim, nor do they permit it to pay for actual losses that could have been covered by permissible insurance (see the limited exception to this statement in the last substantive paragraph of this response). In the paragraph below, we describe further when and how the MEP may pay for a portion of workers compensation claims. In cases where a district decides to insure its employees (including through an available workers compensation program), the MEP is charged its proper share of insurance costs on an ongoing basis. Where, however, a district elects to pay the workers compensation claims when an employee becomes entitled to those payments, the actual claims paid to or on behalf of employees are allowable in the year of the payment. However, for the employee who worked full time for the MEP, a district may not now simply charge the full amount of these costs to MEP funds because the MEP should have already paid its portion of these costs. The district would have either charged these costs on an ongoing basis as direct costs of the Federal program presumably through the district s formula for calculating fringe benefits, or as indirect costs that reflect the district s general administrative expenses approved in the district s indirect cost rate agreement. Please keep in mind that when the charges are taken as direct costs, the district must have a policy of applying them uniformly to all of its employees (for this reason, we doubt that any grantee agency would charge these costs as direct costs.) See OMB Circular A-87 now codified in 2 CFR Part 225, Appendix B, paragraphs 8 d(5) and 22 e, respectively. So that you can properly advise districts on this issue, we note that some payment of workers compensation could have been charged to MEP funds if a district had self-insured and the selfinsurance reserve did not have enough money to cover the claim. Self-insurance reserves are generally included in indirect costs because these are costs of doing business that apply to all activities of the grantee, regardless of whether a particular activity is funded by the Federal government. See 2 CFR Part 225, Appendix B, paragraphs 22 c and d(3). Page 6 of 6
FY18 Migrant Education Program (MEP) January 2018 Policy Questions & Answers (Q&As) Office of Migrant Education (OME) CHILD ELIGIBILITY
CHILD ELIGIBILITY Q. Please explain the difference between #4a and #4b on the Certificate of Eligibility (COE). If a worker actively sought new qualifying work soon after a qualifying move AND has a recent
More informationGuidance for Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Guidance for Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen March 7, 2017 The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is
More informationGuidance for Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Guidance for Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen March 30, 2017 The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is
More informationMigrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility
Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen March 6, 2018 The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and
More informationTitle I, Part C Education of Migratory Children. Texas Migrant Education Program Guidance
Title I, Part C Education of Migratory Children Texas Migrant Education Program Guidance Based on October 23, 2003 Section A: Child Eligibility (Revised August 2010) U.S. Department of Education Guidance
More informationGuidance for Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Guidance for Migrant Education Program (MEP) Eligibility Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Patricia Meyertholen Lisa Gillette 2017 National ID&R Forum New Orleans, Louisiana September 19-21,
More informationEligibility under Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Nae McDaniel, Senior Recruiter/Trainer August 21, 2018
Eligibility under Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Nae McDaniel, Senior Recruiter/Trainer August 21, 2018 Authorities Statute Sections 1115(b) and (c), 1304(c)(2), and 1309 of the Elementary and Secondary
More informationRevisions to the National Certificate of Eligibility (COE)
Revisions to the National Certificate of Eligibility (COE) Maria Rowan Patricia Meyertholen June 1, 2017 The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance,
More informationGRASSROOTS SCIENCE PROGRAM
APRIL 2016 GRASSROOTS SCIENCE PROGRAM State Authorization: Session Law 2015-241, House Bill 97, Section 15.18 An act to make base budget appropriations for Current Operations of State Departments, Institutions,
More informationThe Migrant Education Program 101 A brief overview of the MEP and the OME
The Migrant Education Program 101 A brief overview of the MEP and the OME Lindsay Booth & Tara Ramsey New Directors Orientation March 6, 2017 The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide
More informationRevisions to the National Certificate of Eligibility (COE)
Revisions to the National Certificate of Eligibility (COE) Lisa Gillette Patricia Meyertholen 2017 ID&R Forum New Orleans, Louisiana September 19-21, 2017 The mission of the Office of Migrant Education
More informationMERCER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. 626 MERCER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT SECTION: TITLE: ADOPTED: REVISED: FINANCES FEDERAL FISCAL COMPLIANCE 626. FEDERAL FISCAL COMPLIANCE 1. Authority Part 200 The Board shall ensure federal funds received
More informationLEVERAGING TITLE I, PART C FUNDS
LEVERAGING TITLE I, PART C FUNDS Lisa Gillette Patricia Meyertholen For more information on CAMP, HEP, and MEP visit www.ed.gov Combined Federal Programs Summer Meeting July 30, 2015 The mission of the
More informationI-M 1. District and regional parent advisory councils (PACs) fulfill their responsibilities to:
I. INVOLVEMENT I-ME 01: Parent Advisory Councils I-M 1. District and regional parent advisory councils (PACs) fulfill their responsibilities to: (a) Establish migrant education program goals, objectives,
More informationIdentification & Recruitment (ID&R) and Data Collections Handbook
2017-2018 Identification & Recruitment (ID&R) and Data Collections Handbook TITLE I, PART C EDUCATION OF MIGRATORY CHILDREN GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 205 Jesse Hill Jr. Dr., SE, 1858 Twin Towers
More informationCourthouse News Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) MAINE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ) PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, and ) Civil No. THE MAINE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER,
More informationNATIONAL CERTIFICATE OF ELIGIBILITY (COE) INSTRUCTIONS
Education of Migratory Children under Title I, Part C of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 OMB Control No.: 1810-0662 Exp. 5/31/2020 NATIONAL CERTIFICATE OF ELIGIBILITY (COE) INSTRUCTIONS
More informationGeorgia Department of Education Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP)
Georgia Department of Education Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP) Georgia ID&R: From Hopeulikit GA to Downtown Atlanta 2015 ID&R Forum Louisville, KY. October 6-8, 2015 10/27/2015 1 AGENDA
More informationJorge Echegaray Senior Education Specialist
Presented by: Jorge Echegaray Senior Education Specialist June 2017 Scenario 1 Monica Smith moved to Houma, LA (Terrebonne) when her parents decided to open a restaurant. She was 4 years old when they
More informationWashington State Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program
Washington State Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program QUARTERLY WEBINAR January 19, 2018 1 The Migrant Education Program Update by OSPI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
More informationTitle I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP) Updates FASFEPA Spring Forum May 16, 2018
Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP) Updates FASFEPA Spring Forum May 16, 2018 Dr. Dinh Nguyen, Director 1 Agenda Updates from United States Department of Education (USED) Office of Migrant
More informationLOOKS LIKE A DUCK, QUACKS LIKE A DUCK BUT COULD BE A GATOR SHARPENING YOUR SKILLS IN DETERMINING IF A CHILD IS MEP ELIGIBLE
LOOKS LIKE A DUCK, QUACKS LIKE A DUCK BUT COULD BE A GATOR SHARPENING YOUR SKILLS IN DETERMINING IF A CHILD IS MEP ELIGIBLE DO YOU KNOW ME? I may not start school at the beginning of the school year.
More informationMigrant Education Title I Part C
Migrant Education Title I Part C March 2, 2016 Page 1 of 6 Purpose of the Program The purpose of the Migrant Education Program (MEP) is to provide supplemental educational services to eligible migrant
More informationMigrant Education Program. Morgan Hill Unified School District
Migrant Education Program Morgan Hill Unified School District What is the Migrant Educational Program? Among the neediest students in California are migratory youth children, who change schools throughout
More informationFlorida Migrant Education Program MANUAL FOR IDENTIFICATION AND RECRUITMENT
Florida Migrant Education Program MANUAL FOR IDENTIFICATION AND RECRUITMENT Last revised July 26, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Florida Migrant Education Program (FMEP) Identification & Recruitment (ID&R) Office
More informationQuality Assurance and Compliance Onsite Monitoring Visit for Adult Education and Family Literacy. ACE of Florida, Inc. January 8, 2015.
Quality Assurance and Compliance Onsite Monitoring Visit for Adult Education and Family Literacy ACE of Florida, Inc. Final Report State Board of Education Gary Chartrand, Chair John R. Padget, Vice Chair
More informationPolice Detention Legal Assistance Service
April 2018 Police Detention Legal Assistance Service Operational policy Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry
More informationHEAD START CHILD& FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY-LAWS Board of Directors: General Information
HEAD START CHILD& FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY-LAWS Board of Directors: General Information Meetings: All Board of Directors meetings are held at the Central Office, 333 Buchner Place,
More informationDeportations and Detentions
Deportations and Detentions PROVIDED BY SAN FRANCISCO IMMIGRANT LEGAL AND EDUCATION NETWORK NOTE: This brochure is intended as general information. It is not a substitute for individualized legal advice.
More informationTitle I-C Migrant Student Identification & Reporting
Title I-C Migrant Student Identification & Reporting Gloria Altamirano, Records Coordinator & Malena Gutierrez, ID&R Coordinator Ohio Migrant Education Center (OMEC) 428 ½ Croghan St. Fremont, OH 43420
More informationLast Updated July 22, 2013
REFERENCE MANUAL for ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE REVISED: July 22, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE SECTION A- ECC COMMITTEE MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES SECTION B - SUBCOMMITTEES SECTION C POLICY DOCUMENTS
More informationTitle I, Part C, Migrant Education Program. Webinar September 28, 2012
Title I, Part C, Migrant Education Program Webinar September 28, 2012 Topics Welcome New Districts Migrant Education Program Priorities Grant Application Updates Supplement vs. Supplant End-of-Year Reports
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS BY-LAWS
SHASTA HEAD START CHILD DEVELOPMENT, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY-LAWS Article I Name The name of the Corporation is Shasta County Head Start Child Development, Inc. Article II Purpose Shasta Head Start
More informationNATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS & POVERTY
NATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS & POVERTY Arkansas State Procedures McKinney-Vento Act Dispute Resolution Pursuant to the McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act, a Local Agency ( LEA ) must continue
More information*New* Recruiter Training
*New* Recruiter Training Module 101 2014-15 Michigan Migrant Education Programs Vision The MiMEP vision is to ensure ALL ELIGIBLE migrant students have access to high quality, supplemental educational
More informationI, I "" I ' Revised: 'l~
1: orkli>r.l, ( O'\ l\ FC TO'\S, "" ' Workforce Connections General Policies WA Administrative Standards Policy Approved By: WC Executive Director Policy Adopted on: July 2014 Adinin-010-01 Revised: '\
More informationButte County Office of Education: Migrant Education, Region 2
Butte County Office of Education: Migrant Education, Region 2 The Migrant Education Program was established under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, was reauthorized under the No
More informationBYLAWS ANDREW JACKSON COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
BYLAWS ANDREW JACKSON COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ARTICLE I. NAME The name of the corporation is Andrew Jackson Council, Boy Scouts of America, sometimes referred to in these bylaws as the "corporation."
More informationHidden Chains. Recommendations
Hidden Chains Rights Abuses and Forced Labor in Thailand s Fishing Industry Recommendations To the Government of Thailand Adopt legislation prohibiting use of forced labor as a stand-alone offense, giving
More informationMUNA 2018 PROCEDURES
MUNA 2018 PROCEDURES Principles The Model United Nations Assembly aims to involve senior secondary students in a hands-on experience of a UN-style conference, with the aim of increasing international understanding
More informationSECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR RESOLUTION:
RESOLUTION 2014-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, CALLING FOR A REFERENDUM ELECTION TO DETERMINE IF THE ELECTORS OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZE
More informationRipped from the Headlines
How to Prepare for a Federal Audit Under the Uniform Grants Guidance Leigh Manasevit lmanasevit@bruman.com National Title I Conference February 2015 Ripped from the Headlines Texas School District Security
More informationFlorida Migrant Education Program Service Delivery Plan
Florida Migrant Education Program Service Delivery Plan June 2018 Acronym Description Acronym Descriptions CNA Comprehensive Needs Assessment MEP Migrant Education Program COE Certificate of Eligibility
More informationIMPORTANT THIS PACKET IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE ADVICE OF A PRIVATE ATTORNEY. IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT THIS PACKET IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE ADVICE OF A PRIVATE ATTORNEY. IMPORTANT If either party is in the military, special rules may apply and it is strongly recommended that
More informationBYLAWS TIDEWATER COUNCIL
BYLAWS TIDEWATER COUNCIL ARTICLE I. NAME The name of the corporation is Tidewater Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America, sometimes referred to in these bylaws as the "corporation." SECTION 1. ARTICLE II.
More informationCorrective Action Plans Drafting 101. Intro. Agenda
Corrective Action Plans Drafting 101 Bonnie Little Graham, Esq. bgraham@bruman.com Jenny Segal, Esq. jsegal@bruman.com Fall Forum 2013 Intro [N]ewly purchased items of equipment were not consistently entered
More informationMUNA 2017 PROCEDURES
MUNA 2017 PROCEDURES Principles The Model United Nations Assembly aims to involve senior secondary students in a hands-on experience of a UN-style conference, with the aim of increasing international understanding
More informationContract Assurances Attachment 4. Contract Assurances
Contract Assurances 1) The Contracting Agency assures that it and its subrecipients will establish in accordance with WIA Section 184, fiscal control and fund accounting procedures that may be necessary
More informationYOUTH COMMISSION CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS ARTICLE I
YOUTH COMMISSION CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS ARTICLE I The name of the organization shall be called the Westport Youth and Recreation Commission. ARTICLE II Purpose As provided by the General Municipal Law,
More informationFIELD MANUAL FOR THE MIGRANT FOLLOW-UP DATA COLLECTION (EDITED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE)
FIELD MANUAL FOR THE MIGRANT FOLLOW-UP DATA COLLECTION (EDITED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE) 1. INTRODUCTION This is the second phase of data collection for the 1994-95 CEP-CPC project. The entire project is a follow-up
More informationAuburn University Student Organization Neighborhood Association Constitution and By-Laws
Auburn University Student Organization Neighborhood Association Constitution and By-Laws I. PURPOSE Auburn University s Board of Trustees authorizes the leasing of university property to student organizations
More informationLaw on the Election of Commune/Sangkat Council
Law on the Election of Commune/Sangkat Council Chapter 1: General Provisions Article 1: The purpose of this law is to determine the administration and the conduct of the election of commune/sangkat council.
More informationBYLAWS. Adopted October 22, 1979 Revised September 11, 2001
BYLAWS Adopted October 22, 1979 Revised September 11, 2001 ARTICLE I. NAME The name of the corporation is Central Florida Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America, sometimes referred to in these bylaws as
More informationShared Mission: Opportunities and Challenges Getting to the Future NAFEPA Conference Washington, DC
Shared Mission: Opportunities and Challenges Getting to the Future 2017 NAFEPA Conference Washington, DC { Rich Rasa, Director, State and Local Advice and Assistance Keith Cummins, Assistant Director,
More informationArizona Game and Fish Commission 2016 Five-Year-Review Report. Prepared for the Governor s Regulatory Review Council
Arizona Game and Fish Commission 2016 Five-Year-Review Report TITLE 12. NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 4. GAME AND FISH COMMISSION ARTICLE 5. BOATING AND WATER SPORTS Prepared for the Governor s Regulatory
More informationSTATE BAR OF NEW MEXICO CLE SURVEY TOPLINE RESULTS TOP 12 UNAIDED RESPONSES
STATE BAR OF NEW MEXICO CLE SURVEY TOPLINE RESULTS 1. Where do you complete most of your CLE courses? LOCATION CLE COURSES COMPLETED MOST FREQUENTLY TOTAL RESPONSES (N=652) TOP 10 UNAIDED RESPONSES STATE
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0063 Expires: March 31, 2018 Estimated average burden hours per response.... 1,998.78 A.
More informationHAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS
HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS The agreement shall be subject to the following conditions contained in the OWNER S grant agreement with the Florida Division of Emergency Management.
More informationGAINESVILLE BOAT CLUB BYLAWS. (Revised December 2008) ARTICLE I NAME
GAINESVILLE BOAT CLUB BYLAWS (Revised December 2008) ARTICLE I NAME The official name of this organization shall be the GAINESVILLE BOAT CLUB (the Club ). ARTICLE II PURPOSE The purpose of this organization
More informationDRAFT PLEASE REFER TO THE INSTRUCTIONAL LETTER THAT CAME WITH THIS TEMPLATE. BYLAWS COUNCIL ARTICLE I. NAME
PLEASE REFER TO THE INSTRUCTIONAL LETTER THAT CAME WITH THIS TEMPLATE. BYLAWS COUNCIL ARTICLE I. NAME The name of the corporation is Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America, sometimes referred to in these
More informationPEACE CORPS OPERATIONS PLAN IN THE ABSENCE OF CURRENT YEAR APPROPRIATIONS
January 18, 2018 PEACE CORPS OPERATIONS PLAN IN THE ABSENCE OF CURRENT YEAR APPROPRIATIONS 1. PURPOSE This is general guidance in the event of a funding hiatus caused by the absence of current year appropriations,
More informationMigrant Education Program Title I, Part C. Priority for Services (PFS) Action Plan
Migrant Education Program Title I, Part C Priority for Services (PFS) Action Plan 2011-2012 08/19/2011 1 of 10 Office of Federal Programs Staff Joe Ceballos - Director of Federal Programs/Migrant Service
More informationInternational Social Service-USA Branch 200 East Lexington Street Suite 1700 Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax:
International Social Service-USA Branch 200 East Lexington Street Suite 1700 Baltimore, MD 21202 Phone: 443-451-1200 Fax: 443-451-1230 www.iss-usa.org iss-usa@iss-usa.org TODAY YOU WILL: 1. Analyze complex
More informationOperating a District or Shared Service Arrangement (SSA) Migrant Parent Advisory Council (PAC)
Operating a District or Shared Service Arrangement (SSA) Migrant Parent Advisory Council (PAC) Texas Education Agency Division of NCLB Program Coordination Migrant Education Program Parental Involvement
More informationTitle I, Part C. Education of Migratory Children
Title I, Part C Education of Migratory Children Title I, Part C Education of Migratory Children Intent and Purpose: Title I, Part C provides supplemental resources to local education agencies to provide
More informationMigrant Education Program Comprehensive Needs Assessment Update
Migrant Education Program Comprehensive Needs Assessment Update Submitted to: Office of Migrant Education U.S. Department of Education By: Tomas Mejia, Migrant Education Program Director April 2013 (Updated
More informationANNUAL EVALUATION REPORT. Kentucky Migrant Education Program June 2015 Revised June 2016
ANNUAL EVALUATION REPORT Kentucky Migrant Education Program June 2015 Revised June 2016 CREDITS Arroyo Research Services is an education professional services firm that helps education organizations meet
More informationOffice of the Public Auditor. Monthly Subsistence Allowance Provided to Members of the Senate Covering the Six Months Ending June 30, 2002
Office of the Public Auditor CNMI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Monthly Subsistence Allowance Provided to Members of the Senate Covering the Six Months Ending June 30, 2002 Report No. AR-03-05, dated August 6, 2003
More informationGAO. IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT Controls over Program Authorizing State and Local Enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws Should Be Strengthened
GAO For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EST March 4, 2009 United States Government Accountability Office Testimony Before the Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives IMMIGRATION
More informationAPPROVES CONSOLIDATION
ARIZONA SUPREME APPROVES CONSOLIDATION In October, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a long-awaited Order that effects the most extensive structural changes to Arizona civil procedural rules since the initial
More informationAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION Corporate Governance for Mutuals APPENDIX. Sample Nominating Committee Charter
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION Corporate Governance for Mutuals APPENDIX Sample Nominating Committee Charter MUTUAL BANK NAME NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER Purpose The purpose of the Nominating Committee
More information42 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 105 - COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS SUBCHAPTER II - HEAD START PROGRAMS 9839. Administrative requirements and standards (a) Employment practices, nonpartisanship,
More informationNEVADA STATE DELEGATE SELECTION PLAN
NEVADA STATE DELEGATE SELECTION PLAN FOR THE 2020 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION ISSUED BY THE NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY (AS OF FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 2019) The Nevada Delegate Selection Plan For the 2020
More informationCITY OF GONZALES BANK DEPOSITORY SERVICE RFP
CITY OF GONZALES BANK DEPOSITORY SERVICE RFP NOTICE TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS PROPOSAL FOR DEPOSITORY CONTRACT " ;. ':,; Notice is hereby given that the Governing Body of the City of Gonzales, Texas, subject
More information(i) Non-Immigrant Visa (NIV), (Business, Visit, Tourist) single entry US$120.00
This is to inform all visa applicants holding U.S. passports or Travel Documents that effective immediately, Non-Immigrant Visa (NIV) fee for single entry to Nigeria is now US$100 instead of previous figure
More informationPolicy on Conducting Right to Study Checks
Policy on Conducting Right to Study Checks Verifying Pupils' Immigration Status City of London Freemen's School 24 November 2017 1 Introduction 1.1 The City of London Corporation (the School) is licensed
More informationThe Education of Migratory Children and Youth. Unit of Federal Programs Office of Language, Culture and Equity
The Education of Migratory Children and Youth Unit of Federal Programs Office of Language, Culture and Equity September 18, 2014 The Goal This session will cover the statutory purpose and background of
More informationIC Repealed (As added by P.L , SEC.244. Repealed by P.L , SEC.15.)
IC 11-8-8 Chapter 8. Sex Offender Registration IC 11-8-8-0.1 Repealed (As added by P.L.220-2011, SEC.244. Repealed by P.L.63-2012, SEC.15.) IC 11-8-8-0.2 Application of certain amendments to prior law
More informationNATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION. Requirements for the Allocation and Election of Delegates to the NEA Representative Assembly
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION Requirements for the Allocation and Election of Delegates to the NEA Representative Assembly 2015 NEA Representative Assembly Orlando, Florida Timeline for the Allocation
More informationEMPLOYEE HANDBOOK/DISTRICT POLICIES JOB DESCRIPTION. OVERTIME POLICY (Applicable Non-Certified Employees)
APPENDIX 1 EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK/DISTRICT POLICIES I hereby certify by my signature that I have received, read, understand, and agree to abide by the terms of the Employee Handbook and all other applicable
More informationIn this agreement, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings unless the context otherwise requires:
Memos: terms of use Introduction The following licence terms will govern the use of the licensed material and Advice Line by the Subscriber to an Indicator - FL Memo Ltd publication. Copyright and other
More informationNECTD Title VI Policy and Procedures. northeastern connecticut transit district nectd.org
NECTD Title VI Policy and Procedures northeastern connecticut transit district nectd.org Introduction The Northeastern Connecticut Transit District (NECTD) is committed to a policy of non-discrimination
More informationRules of Practice in Proceedings under Section 5 of the Debt Collection Act
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/18/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-03368, and on FDsys.gov 7710-12 POSTAL SERVICE 39 CFR Part 961
More informationNEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
NEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR By-Laws Of The Management Committee Article I. Relationship to ISO Agreement 1.01 The Management Committee of the New York Independent System Operator (the ISO ) is
More informationCONSOLIDATED AGREEMENTS BETWEEN UWI, MONA AND WIGUT, JAMAICA FOR UWI 12:
CONSOLIDATED AGREEMENTS BETWEEN UWI, MONA AND WIGUT, JAMAICA FOR UWI 12: 1984-2008 MITS User WEST INDIES GROUP OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS, JAMAICA Contents Consolidated WIGUT Agreements for UWI 12 from 1984
More informationINSTRUCTIONS. If the petitioner cannot meet the income requirements, a joint sponsor may submit an additional affidavit of support.
US Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service OMB No 1115-0214 Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the Act Purpose of this Form This form is required to show that an intending
More informationNorthern Elementary School Site Based Decision Making Council By-Laws
Northern Elementary School Site Based Decision Making Council By-Laws ARTICLE I. PURPOSE To provide the council with a set of operational guidelines with which to function effectively. ARTICLE II. MISSION
More informationGUIDELINE 13: Relocate and evacuate migrants when needed
GUIDELINE 13: Relocate and evacuate migrants when needed Certain stakeholders have mandates and unique skills to address the needs of different migrants. Referral procedures can help access these skills
More informationFresno Regional Workforce Development Board
Fresno Regional Workforce Development Board A proud member of America s Job Center of California SM Network 2125 Kern Street, Suite 208 Fresno, California 93721 559.490.7100 Fax 559.490.7199 www.workforce-connection.com
More informationSUMMARY: This final rule adopts the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) we
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/10/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-19568, and on FDsys.gov 4191-02U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
More informationThe Essential Report. 1 July 2016 ESSENTIALMEDIA.COM.AU
The Essential Report 1 July 2016 ESSENTIALMEDIA.COM.AU The Essential Report Date: 1/7/2016 Prepared By: Essential Research Data Supplied: Essential Media Communications is a member of the Association of
More informationINTERAGENCY COOPERATION CONTRACT between THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
INTERAGENCY COOPERATION CONTRACT between THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS State of Texas County of Travis ' ' ' OAG Contract No. This contract is entered into by the Office
More informationParent Advisory Council PAC TRAINING MANUAL
Parent Advisory Council PAC TRAINING MANUAL Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) Washington State Migrant Education Program PO Box 47200 Olympia, WA 98504-7200 (360) 725-6147
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2019 SENATE BILL 136
Stricken language will be deleted and underlined language will be added. 0 0 0 State of Arkansas nd General Assembly As Engrossed: S// S// S// A Bill Regular Session, 0 SENATE BILL By: Joint Budget Committee
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 168
Stricken language will be deleted and underlined language will be added. 0 State of Arkansas st General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, SENATE BILL By: Joint Budget Committee For An Act To Be Entitled
More informationAMENDED BYLAWS OF ANDERSON VALLEY HEALTH CENTER, INC. ARTICLE I Purpose. ARTICLE II Offices
AMENDED BYLAWS OF ANDERSON VALLEY HEALTH CENTER, INC. ARTICLE I Purpose Section 1. Objectives and Purposes The Anderson Valley Health Center Corporation exists to ensure provision of quality, affordable
More informationEligibility and Application Information
February 21, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Eligible Applicants Tony Smith, Ph.D. State Superintendent of Education NOTICE OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY (NOFO) / REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP): Fiscal Year 2018 Summer
More informationChapter 801. LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARDS. Section contains amendments regarding Requests for Formation of Boards.
Chapter 801. Local Workforce Development Boards Sections 801.1, 801.11-801.13, 801.16, 801.17 and Section 801.3 The following rule(s) will be effective November 2, 2000. Chapter 801. LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
More informationAIDSNET BYLAWS ARTICLE I - NAME ARTICLE II - ORGANIZATION ARTICLE III - PURPOSE MISSION
AIDSNET BYLAWS ARTICLE I - NAME 1.1 The name of this organization shall be AIDSNET. ARTICLE II - ORGANIZATION 2.1 The organization shall be a voluntary, not for profit corporation incorporated under the
More informationTENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS
TENTATIVE CALENDAR OF GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 6, 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE All documents are to be filed with and duties performed by the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk unless otherwise specified. DATES
More information