Indicator : Number of countries with migra;on policies that facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migra;on and mobility of people

Transcription

1 Indicator : Number of countries with migra;on policies that facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migra;on and mobility of people IOM / Alexander Rozhenyuk

2 Process of developing indicator Mapping of exis.ng indicators Conceptual framework: Migra.on Governance Framework, welcomed by IOM Council Data source: UN Inquiry among Governments on Popula.on and Development Simple methodology (see SDG indicators and 5.6.2) Extensive consulta.ons, involving a range of stakeholders Regionallyrepresenta.ve pilot

3 The conceptual framework: Migra;on Governance Framework (MiGOF) SDG indicator DOMAINS

4 For each domain, one ques;on with five subcategories 2. Domain: Whole-of-government/ Evidence-based policies Proxy measure: Dedicated ins.tu.ons, legal frameworks and policies or strategies to govern migra.on Ques;on: Does the Government have any of the following ins.tu.ons, policies or strategies to govern immigra.on or emigra.on? Subcategories: a. A dedicated Government agency to implement na.onal migra.on policy b. A na.onal policy or strategy for regular migra.on pathways, including labour migra.on c. A na.onal policy or strategy to promote the inclusion or integra.on of immigrants d. Formal mechanisms to ensure that the migra.on policy is gender responsive e. A mechanism to ensure that migra.on policy is informed by data, appropriately disaggregated

5 Methodology and computa;onal method Coding of values: Domain 1: Yes, regardless of immigra.on status coded 1 ; Yes, only for those with legal immigra.on status coded 0.5 ; No coded 0 Domains 2 to 6: Yes coded 1 ; No coded 0 Computa;on: Unweighted average of the 30 subcategories (percentage) Categoriza;on of results: Less than 40 per cent Requires further progress 40 to less than 80 per cent Par.ally meets 80 per cent or more Meets or fully meets Disaggrega;on: By region By domain Treatment of missing values: No imputa.on of values No imputa.on of missing country data

6 Scope of the proposed indicator SDG indicator DOES: Document the existence and range of migra.on policies at the country level Monitor progress across comparable policy domains Document policy gaps, allowing to iden.fy need for capacity building Reflect the different reali.es of countries of origin, transit and des.na.on DOES NOT: Serve as a na.onal monitoring framework for migra.on policies Provide an exhaus.ve picture of migra.on policies Address the implementa.on of migra.on policies Assess the impact or effec.veness of migra.on policies

7 Data source: The United Na;ons Inquiry among Governments on Popula;on and Development Mandate: General Assembly resolu.on 1838 (XVII) of 18 December 1962 Conducted on behalf of the Secretary-General Periodicity: Biennial (every two years) star.ng with the Twelfh Inquiry (2018) Content of the TwelUh Inquiry: Module I on popula.on ageing and urbaniza.on Module II on fer.lity, family planning and reproduc.ve health Module III on interna.onal migra.on. Process for the collec;on and dissemina;on of data (Twelfh Inquiry): Implemented in the second half of 2018 Sent to 193 Member States, 2 Observer and 2 non-member States through their Permanent Missions to the UN in New York Permanent Missions redirect the modules to the relevant government departments IOM and OECD assist in garnering government responses to Module III through their substan.ve counterparts or country offices Country responses transmiied to UN DESA for basic consistency checking Data compiled/integrated into the World Popula.on Policies database

8 Consulta;ons on the methodology for indicator Date Type of event Venue Par;cipants 29 February - 1 March 2016 Panel in the IOM Interna.onal Dialogue on New York, USA 282 par.cipants, including 155 Migra.on governments representa.ves 12 December 2016 Presenta.on at the Global Forum on Migra.on and Development Dhaka, Bangladesh 150 par.cipants June 2017 Session at the Expert Group Mee.ng on SDGs and Migra.on Data New York, USA 46 par.cipants, including representa.ves from 14 NSO 5 July 2017 Consulta.on on the Migra.on Governance Geneva, Switzerland 45 par.cipants Indicators 29 August 2017 Half-day workshop on indicator , organised by UN DESA, IOM and ECLAC San.ago, Chile 15 par.cipants, including government officials 8 November 2017 Half-day workshop on indicator , organised by UN DESA, IOM and ESCAP Bangkok, Thailand 33 par.cipants from 19 countries 18 December 2017 Half-day event organised by IOM to brief on the World Migra.on Report 2018 and New York, USA 70 representa.ves, including Member States on World Migra.on Indicators February 2018 Presenta.on at a session of the Coordina.on Mee.ng on Interna.onal Migra.on New York, USA 243 par.cipants, including government representa.ves from 39 countries March 2018 Presenta.on at the IOM Interna.onal Dialogue on Migra.on New York, USA 300 par.cipants, including government representa.ves, Mid-March to April 2018 Three dedicated consulta.ons for Africa, Europe and Northern America, and Western Asia organised by UN DESA, IOM, ECA and ESCWA Online 44 par.cipants, including government representa.ves and experts from 21 countries June 2018 Presenta.on at the OECD Working Party on Paris, France government representa.ves Migra.on from 33 countries

9 Pilot of indicator Thirty countries invited to take part in the pilot; six from each of the UN regional commissions. Ten countries responded to the questionnaire: Côte D'Ivoire; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Finland; France; Lesotho; Lithuania; Mexico; Morocco; Sweden and Yemen. In addition, over twenty countries provided feedback on the proposed methodology. Number of countries with well-managed migra;on policies as a percentage of countries that par;cipated in the pilot Requires Par;ally Meets or fully progress meets meets Domain 1. Migrant rights 10% 40% 50% Domain 2. Whole-of-government/ Evidence-based policies 10% 50% 40% Domain 3. Coopera;on and partnerships 30% 30% 40% Domain 4. Socioeconomic well-being 20% 50% 30% Domain 5. Mobility dimensions of crises 20% 40% 40% Domain 6. Safe, orderly and regular migra;on 20% 60% 20% Overall indicator % 70% 10%