LX CPE Evidence ( )

Transcription

1 LX CPE Evidence ( ) View Online This is a provisional list that has yet to be reviewed. Items may therefore change. Dr. Susan Easton [1] Alastair Mullis Delayed criminal prosecutions for childhood sexual abuse: ensuring a fair trial. Law Quarterly Review. 115 (April) (1999), [2] Alex Stein After Hunt: The burden of proof, risk of non-persuasion and judicial pragmatism. The Modern Law Review. Vol. 54, No. 4. [3] Allen, C. J. W Practical guide to evidence. Routledge-Cavendish. [4] Allen, C. J. W The law of evidence in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press. [5] Anderson, Terence et al Analysis of evidence. Cambridge University Press. [6] Andrew Ashworth The Human Rights Act 1998: Part 2: Article 6 and the fairness of trials. Criminal Law Review. April (1999). 1/48

2 [7] Andrew L.-T Choo Evidence law in England and Wales: the impact of the Human Rights Act International journal of evidence & proof. 7, 1 (2003). [8] Ashworth, A Excluding Evidence as Protecting Rights. Criminal law review. (1977), [9] Ashworth, A. Re-drawing the boundaries of entrapment. Criminal law review. [10] Ashworth, A. Should the police be allowed to use deceptive practices? Law quarterly review [11] Ashworth, A. The Human Rights Act 1998: part 2: article 6 and the fairness of trials. Criminal law review [12] Ashworth, A The Human Rights Act 1998: Part 2: article 6 and the fairness of trials. Criminal law review. (1999). [13] Ashworth, A. and Redmayne, M The criminal process. Oxford University Press. [14] Ashworth, A.J. Criminal proceedings after the Human Rights Act: the first year. Criminal law 2/48

3 review [15] Ashworth, A.J. excluding evidence as protecting rights. Criminal Law Review [16] Ashworth, Andrew Four threats to the presumption of innocence. International journal of evidence & proof. 10, 4 (2006). [17] Auburn, J. Implied waiver and adverse inferences. Law quarterly review (case comment). 115, [18] Auld, Robin Review of the criminal courts of England and Wales: report, October Stationery Office. [19] Bandalli, S Abolition of the Presumption of Doli Incapax and the Criminalisation of Children. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 37, 2 (May 1998), [20] Barton, C Hearing children s voices. Family law. (1999). [21] Bates, P The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act - the evidence of children and vulnerable adults. Child and family law quarterly. 11, 3 (1999), [22] 3/48

4 Birch, D. Rethinking sexual history evidence: proposals for fairer trials. Criminal law review. [23] Birch, D. Untangling sexual history evidence: a rejoinder to Professor Temkin. Criminal law review. [24] Birch, D.J A better deal for vulnerable witnesses? Criminal law review. (2000). [25] Birch, D.J. Corroboration: goodbye to all that? Criminal law review. [26] Birch, D.J Criminal Justice Act 1991: Part 4: children s evidence. Criminal law review. April (1992), [27] Birch, D.J Criminal Justice Act 1991: Part 4: Children s evidence. Criminal law review. April (1992), [28] Birch, D.J. Hunting the snark: the elusive statutory exception. Criminal law review [29] Birch, D.J. The pace hots up: confessions and confusions under the 1984 Act. Criminal law review /48

5 [30] Birch, D.J. The sharp end of the wedge: use of mixed statements by the defence. Criminal law review. [31] Birch, Diane and Leng, Roger Blackstone s guide to the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act Blackstone. [32] Birdling, M Self-incrimination goes to Strasbourg: O Halloran and Francis v United Kingdom. International journal of evidence & proof. 12, 1 (2008), [33] Blake, M. The presumption of innocence in English criminal law. Criminal law review [34] Boyle, C Reasonable doubt in credibility contests: sexual assault and sexual equality. International journal of evidence & proof. 13, 4 (2009), [35] Bronitt, Simon The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe. Common Law World Review. Vol. 33, Issue 1 (2004), [36] Bucke, Tom et al In police custody: police powers and suspects rights under the revised PACE codes of practice. Home Office, Research and Statistics Directorate. [37] 5/48

6 Bucke, Tom et al In police custody: police powers and suspects rights under the revised PACE codes of practice. Home Office, Research and Statistics Directorate. [38] Burton, M. et al. Implementing special measures for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses: the problem of identification. Criminal law review [39] Burton, M Vulnerable and intimidated witnesses and the adversarial process in England and Wales. International journal of evidence & proof. 11, 1 (2007), [40] Cape, E. Advising on Silence: New Cases, New Strategies. Legal action. [41] Children Act 1989:. [42] Children and Young Persons Act 1933:. [43] Childs, M. and Ellison, L Feminist perspectives on evidence. Cavendish. [44] Childs, Mary and Ellison, Louise Feminist perspectives on evidence. Cavendish. [45] Choo, A.L.-T. Confessions and corroboration: a comparative perspective. Criminal law 6/48

7 review. [46] Choo, A.L.-T Evidence. Oxford University Press. [47] Choo, A.L.-T. Evidence law in England and Wales: the impact of the Human Rights Act International journal of evidence and proof. 7, 1, [48] Choo, A.L.-T Prepared statements, legal advice and the right to silence: R v Knight. International journal of evidence & proofcase comment. 8, 1 (2004), [49] Choo, A.L.-T Prepared statements, legal advice and the right to silence: R v Knight. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 8, 1 (2004), [50] Choo, A.L.-T Silence on legal advice revisited: R v Howell. International journal of evidence & proof (case comment). 7, 3 (2003). [51] Choo, A.L.-T The notion of relevance and defence evidence. Criminal law review. (1993), [52] Choo, A.L.T. Halting criminal prosecutions: the abuse of process doctrine revisited. Criminal law review. 7/48

8 [53] Choo, A.L.T Improperly obtained evidence in the Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales? International journal of evidence & proof. 11, 2 (2007). [54] Choo, Andrew L.-T Abuse of process and judicial stays of criminal proceedings. Oxford University Press. [55] Choo, Andrew L.-T Silence on legal advice revisited: R v Howell. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 7, 3 (2003). [56] Colm Campbell Two steps backwards: the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act Criminal Law Review. [57] Colm Campbell Two steps backwards: the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act Criminal Law Review. (1999). [58] Cooper, D Pigot unfulfilled: video-recorded cross-examination under section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act Criminal law review. June (2005). [59] Cooper, D Pigot unfulfilled: video-recorded cross-examination under section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act Criminal law review. Jun (2005), [60] 8/48

9 Cooper, S Legal advice and pre-trial silence - unreasonable developments. International journal of evidence & proof. 10, 1 (2006). [61] Cooper, S Legal advice and pre-trial silence - unreasonable developments. International journal of evidence & proof. 10, 1 (2006). [62] Cooper, S Legal advice and pre-trial silence - unreasonable developments. International journal of evidence & proof. 10, 1 (2006). [63] Cooper, S Legal advice and pre-trial silence unreasonable developments. The international journal of evidence & proof. 10, 1 (Jan. 2006), [64] Coroners and Justice Act 2009:. [65] Creighton, P Spouse competence and compellability. Criminal law review. (1990). [66] Crime and Disorder Act 1998:. [67] Criminal Evidence Act 1898:. [68] 9/48

10 Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998:. [69] Criminal Justice Act 1967:. [70] Criminal Justice Act 1988:. [71] Criminal Justice Act 1991:. [72] Criminal Justice Act 2003:. [73] Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008:. [74] Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994:. [75] Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act 1991:. [76] Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964:. 10/48

11 [77] Cutler, Brian L. and Penrod, Steven Mistaken identification: the eyewitness, psychology, and the law. Cambridge University Press. [78] David Feldman Regulating treatment of suspects in police stations: judicial interpretation of detention provisions in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act Criminal law review. [79] Dennis, I Reconstructing the law of Evidence. Current legal problems. 21, (1989). [80] Dennis, I. Sexual history evidence: evaluating section 41. Criminal law review (Editorial). [81] Dennis, I. Silence in the police station: the marginalisation of section 34. Criminal law review [82] Dennis, I. Silence in the police station: the marginalisation of section 34. Criminal law review. [83] Dennis, I The right to confront witnesses: meanings, myths and human rights. Criminal law review. 4 (2010). [84] 11/48

12 Dennis, I. H The law of evidence. Thomson Reuters. [85] Diane J. Birch Suffering in silence: a cost-benefit analysis of section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act Criminal law review. (1999). [86] Diane J. Birch Suffering in silence: a cost-benefit analysis of section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act Criminal Law Review. (1999). [87] Dingwall, G Statutory exceptions, burdens of proof and the Human Rights Act Modern law review. 65, 3 (2002). [88] Doak, J Child witnesses: do special measures directions prejudice the accused s right to a fair hearing? R v Camberwell Green Youth Court, ex p. D; R v Camberwell Green Youth Court, ex p. G. International journal of evidence & proof. 9, 4 (2005), [89] Doak, J. et al Evidence in context. Routledge. [90] Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004:. [91] Duff, Antony The trial on trial: Volume 3: Towards a normative theory of the criminal trial. Hart. 12/48

13 [92] Duff, R. A The trial on trial: Volume one: Truth and due process. Hart. [93] Durston, G Bad character evidence and non-party witnesses under the Criminal Justice Act International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 8, 4 (2004), [94] Durston, G Cross-Examination of Rape Complainants: Ongoing Tensions between Conflicting Priorities in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Criminal Law. 62, 1 (1998), [95] Durston, G The impact of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 on similar fact evidence. Journal of criminal law. 68, 4 (2004), [96] Durston, Gregory Evidence: text & materials. Oxford University Press. [97] Dwyer, D Can a marriage be delayed in the public interest so as to maintain the compellability of a prosecution witness?: R (on the application of the Crown Prosecution Service) v Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages. International journal of evidence & proof. 7, 3 (2003), [98] Easton, S. Adventures in Neverland: child abuse trials in the wake of the Jackson case. Family law. [99] 13/48

14 Easton, S Adverse inferences and the right to silence. International journal of evidence & proof. 4, 1 (2000), [100] Easton, S Legal advice, common sense and the right to silence. International journal of evidence & proof. 2, 2 (1998), [101] Easton, Susan The case for the right to silence. Ashgate. [102] Easton, Susan The case for the right to silence. Ashgate. [103] Edwards, S Compelling a reluctant spouse. New law journal. 139, (1989). [104] Ellison, L Closing the credibility gap: the prosecutorial use of expert witness testimony in sexual assault cases. International journal of evidence & proof. 9, 4 (2005). [105] Ellison, L The mosaic art?: Cross-examination and the vulnerable witness. Legal studies: the journal of the Society of Legal Scholars. 21, 3 (2001), [106] Ellison, L The protection of vulnerable witnesses in court: an Anglo-Dutch comparison. International journal of evidence & proof. 3, 1 (1998). 14/48

15 [107] Ellison, Louise The adversarial process and the vulnerable witness. Oxford University Press. [108] Emson, R Evidence. Palgrave Macmillan. [109] Family Law Reform Act 1969:. [110] Finch, E Juror Stereotypes and Blame Attribution in Rape Cases Involving Intoxicants: The Findings of a Pilot Study. British Journal of Criminology. 45, 1 (Jun. 2004), [111] Finch, E. and Munro, V Breaking Boundaries: Sexual Consent in the Jury Room. Legal Studies. 26, 3 (2006), [112] Finch, E. and Munro, V.E The demon drink and the demonized woman: socio-sexual stereotypes and responsibility attribution in rape trials Involving intoxicants. Social & Legal Studies. 16, 4 (Dec. 2007), [113] Fitzpatrick, B Human rights and the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Journal of Criminal Law. 65, 5 (2001), [114] Fortson, R Bad character evidence and cross-admissibility. Criminal law review. 15/48

16 (2009), [115] Francis Bennion Statutory exceptions: a third knot in the golden thread? Criminal law review [116] Gearty, C.A. Insanity and the European Court of Human Rights. Criminal law review [117] Geddes, A The exclusion of evidence relating to a complainant s sexual behaviour in sexual offence trials. New law journal. 149, 6897 (1999). [118] Gerry Kearns More fact(s) about the insanity defence. Criminal law review. [119] Giannoulopoulos, D The exclusion of improperly obtained evidence in Greece: putting constitutional rights first. International journal of evidence & proof. 11, 3 (2007), [120] Gillespie, A.A Compellability of a child victim. Journal of criminal law. 64, 1 (2000), [121] Glover, R. and Murphy, P Murphy on evidence. Oxford University Press. 16/48

17 [122] Goudkamp, J Bad character evidence and reprehensible behaviour. The international journal of evidence & proof. 12, 2 (Apr. 2008), [123] Great Britain Criminal law: evidence in criminal proceedings : previous misconduct of a defendant; a consultation paper. HMSO. [124] Great Britain and Great Britain Memorandum of good practice on video recorded interviews with child witnesses for criminal proceedings. Home Office. [125] Great Britain and Great Britain Speaking up for justice: report of the Interdepartmental Working Group Report of the Interdepartmental Working Group on the Treatment of Vulnerable or Intimidated Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System. Home Office. [126] Gregory, J. and Lees, S Attrition in rape and sexual assault cases. British Journal of Criminology. 36, 1 (1996), [127] Grevling, K Fairness and the exclusion of evidence under section 78(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Law quarterly review. 113 (1997), [128] Grevling, K Fairness and the exclusion of evidence under Section 78(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Law quarterly review. 113, (1997). [129] 17/48

18 Grevling, K. Fairness and the exclusion of evidence under section 78(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Law quarterly review [130] Gudjonsson, G.H Unreliable confessions and miscarriages of justice in Britain. International journal of police science & management. 4, 4 (2002), [131] Gudjonsson, Gisli The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Wiley. [132] Gudjonsson, Gisli The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Wiley. [133] Gudjonsson, Gisli The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Wiley. [134] Gudjonsson, Gisli The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. J. Wiley. [135] Hall, M Children Giving Evidence through Special Measures in the Criminal Courts: Progress and Problems Research. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 21, 1 (2009), [136] Hall, M Giving evidence at just 4: just means to just ends? Family law. (2009), [137] 18/48

19 Hamer, D A Dynamic Reconstruction of the Presumption of Innocence. Oxford journal of legal studies. 31, 2 (Apr. 2011), [138] Hamer, D The Truth Will Out? Incoherence and Scepticism in Foundations of Evidence Law. Modern law review. 70, 2 (Mar. 2007), [139] Hamlyn, B. et al Are special measures directions working? Evidence from surveys of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses. Home office. [140] Harris, Jessica et al A question of evidence?: investigating and prosecuting rape in the 1990s. Home Office. [141] Hartshorne, J Corroboration and care warnings after Makanjuola. International journal of evidence & proof. 2, 1 (1998). [142] Hartshorne, J Defensive use of a co-accused s confession and the Criminal Justice Act International journal of evidence & proof. 8, 3 (2004). [143] Healy, P. Proof and policy: no golden threads. Criminal law review [144] Heaton-Armstrong, Anthony Witness testimony: psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives. Oxford University Press. 19/48

20 [145] Heaton-Armstrong, Anthony Witness testimony: psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives. Oxford University Press. [146] Ho, H.L Justice in the Pursuit of Truth: A Moral Defence of the Similar Facts Rule. Common Law World Review. 35, 1 (Jan. 2006), [147] Ho, H.L Re-imagining the criminal standard of proof: lessons from the ethics of belief. The international journal of evidence & proof. 13, 3 (Jul. 2009), [148] Ho, H.L Similar Facts in Civil Cases. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26, 1 (Jan. 2006), [149] Ho, H.L State entrapment. Legal Studies. 31, 1 (Mar. 2011), [150] Ho, H. L A philosophy of evidence law: justice in the search for truth. Oxford University Press. [151] Homicide Act 1957:. [152] Hoyano, L.C.H Coroners and Justice Act 2009: special measures directions take two: entrenching unequal access to justice? Criminal law review. 5 (2010), /48

21 [153] Hoyano, L.C.H Striking a balance between the rights of defendants and vulnerable witnesses: will special measures directions contravene guarantees of a fair trial? Criminal law review. December (2001). [154] Hoyano, L.C.H Variations on a theme by Pigot: special measures directions for child witnesses. Criminal law review. April (2000). [155] Hunter, M. Judicial discretion: section 78 in practice. Criminal law review. [156] Huxley, P Evidence: the fundamentals. Thomson Reuters. [157] Huxley, P Mental gymnastics and intellectual acrobatics: the meanings of statutory and common law bad character. The Journal of criminal law. 75, 2 (Apr. 2011), [158] Huxley, Phil Blackstone s statutes on evidence. Oxford University Press. [159] Ian Dennis Miscarriages of justice and the law of confessions: evidentiary issues and solutions. Public law. Summer (1993). [160] 21/48

22 Ian Dennis Reverse onuses and the presumption of innocence: in search of principle. Criminal Law Review [161] J.R. Spencer Sentencing, children s evidence and children's trauma. Criminal Law Review. June (1990). [162] Jackson, J Re-conceptualizing the right of silence as an effective fair trial standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 58, 04 (Oct. 2009). [163] Jackson, J.D. and Summers, S.J The internationalisation of criminal evidence: beyond the common law and civil law traditions. Cambridge University Press. [164] Jackson, J.D. and Summers, S.J The internationalisation of criminal evidence: beyond the common law and civil law traditions. Cambridge University Press. [165] Jackson, J.D. and Summers, S.J The internationalisation of criminal evidence: beyond the common law and civil law traditions. Cambridge University Press. [166] Jackson, John D. and Summers, Sarah J The internationalisation of criminal evidence: beyond the common law and civil law traditions. Cambridge University Press. [167] Jennifer Temkin Sexual history evidence - beware the backlash. Criminal Law Review. 22/48

23 [168] Jennings, A.F. Silence and safety: the impact of human rights law. Criminal law review [169] Jennings, A.F. Silence and safety: the impact of human rights law. Criminal law review [170] Jeremy Bentham Rationale of judicial evidence. F.B. Rothman. [171] John D. Jackson Analysing the New Evidence Scholarship: Towards a New Conception of the Law of Evidence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 16, No. 2. [172] John D. Jackson Silence and proof: extending the boundaries of criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom. International journal of evidence & proof. 5, 3 (2001), [173] John D. Jackson Silence and proof: extending the boundaries of criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom. International journal of evidence & proof. 5, 3 (2001), [174] Jonathan Auburn Implied waiver and adverse inferences. Law Quarterly ReviewCase Comment. 115 (1999). [175] Justice for all:. 23/48

24 [176] Keane, Adrian and McKeown, Paul The modern law of evidence. Oxford University Press. [177] Kearns, G. An upturn in unfitness to plead? Disability in relation to the trial under the 1991 Act. Criminal law review [178] Keenan, C Interviewing allegedly abused children with a view to criminal prosecution. Criminal law review. November (1999), [179] Kelly, L. et al A Gap or a Chasm?, Home Office Research Study 293. Home office. [180] Kelly, L Section 41: an evaluation of new legislation limiting sexual history evidence in rape trials. Home Office. [181] Kerrigan, K Mentally Disordered Suspects: The Lessons of R v. Aspinall. Journal of Criminal Law. 64, 1 (2000), [182] Kibble, N Judicial discretion and the admissibility of prior sexual history evidence under section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: sometimes sticking to your guns means shooting yourself in the foot: Part 2. Criminal law review. Apr (2005), /48

25 [183] Kibble, N. Judicial perspectives on the operation of s.41 and the relevance and admissibility of prior sexual history evidence: four scenarios: Part 1. Criminal law review. [184] Kibble, N. The sexual history provisions: charting a course between inflexible legislative rules and wholly untrammelled judicial discretion? Criminal law review [185] Kimberley, Keith et al New readings: contributions to an understanding of literacy. A & C Black. [186] Laudan, L Need verdicts come in pairs? The International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 14, 1 (Jan. 2010), [187] Laudan, Larry Truth, error and criminal law: an essay in legal epistemology. Cambridge University Press. [188] Laura C.H. Hoyano The child witness review: much ado about too little. Criminal Law Review [189] Lees, Sue Carnal knowledge: rape on trial. Women s Press. [190] Leng, R Silence in court: from common sense to common law: Azzopardi. 25/48

26 International journal of evidence & proof (case comment). 6, 1 (2002). [191] Leng, R Silence pre-trial, reasonable expectations and the normative distortion of fact finding. International journal of evidence & proof. 5, 4 (2001), [192] Leng, R Silence pre-trial, reasonable expectations and the normative distortion of fact finding. International journal of evidence & proof. 5, 4 (2001). [193] Leng, Roger and Great Britain The right to silence in police interrogation: a study of some of the issues underlying the debate. HMSO. [194] Leng, Roger and Great Britain The right to silence in police interrogation: a study of some of the issues underlying the debate. HMSO. [195] Lewis, P. The Human Rights Act 1998: shifting the burden. Criminal law review [196] Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on lay magistrates of hearing that the defendant is of good character, being left to speculate, or hearing that he has a previous conviction. Criminal law review [197] Lloyd-Bostock, Sally M. and Clifford, Brian R Evaluating witness evidence: recent psychological research and new perspectives. Wiley. 26/48

27 [198] Louise Ellison Cross-examination in rape trials. Criminal Law Review. [199] Louise Ellison Promoting effective case-building in rape cases: a comparative perspective. Criminal Law Review [200] M. Dumont A Treatise on Judicial Evidence, Extracted from the Manuscripts of Jeremy Bentham. Fred B Rothman & Co. [201] Mack, K Continuing barriers to women s credibility: A feminist perspective on the proof process. Criminal Law Forum. 4, 2 (1993), [202] Mackay, R.D. et al A continued upturn in unfitness to plead - more disability in relation to the trial under the 1991 Act. Criminal law review. (2007), [203] Mackay, R.D. et al. Yet more facts about the insanity defence. Criminal law review [204] Mackay, R.D. and Mitchell, B.J. Sleepwalking, automatism and insanity. Criminal law review [205] 27/48

28 Madhloom, L Corruption and a reverse burden of proof. The Journal of Criminal Law. 75, (Apr. 2011), [206] Magistrates Courts Act 1980:. [207] Malcolm Birdling Self-incrimination goes to Strasbourg: O Halloran and Francis v United Kingdom. International journal of evidence & proof. 12, 1 (2008), [208] Malcolm Birdling Self-incrimination goes to Strasbourg: O Halloran and Francis v United Kingdom. International Journal of Evidence & ProofCase Comment. 12, 1 (2008), [209] Mary Hunter Judicial discretion: Section 78 in practice. Criminal Law Review. [210] May, R. Admissibility of Confessions: Recent Developments. Journal of Criminal Law. 55, 3, [211] McAlhone, Christina Core statutes on evidence. Palgrave Macmillan. [212] McCartney, C Forensic identification and criminal justice: forensic science, justice and risk. Routledge. 28/48

29 [213] McColgan, A Common law and the relevance of sexual history evidence. Oxford journal of legal studies. 16, 2 (Jun. 1996), [214] McConville, Michael and Great Britain Corroboration and confessions: the impact of a rule requiring that no conviction can be sustained on the basis of confession evidence alone. HMSO. [215] McEwan, J In defence of vulnerable witnesses: the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act International journal of evidence & proof. 4, 1 (2000), [216] McEwan, J In defence of vulnerable witnesses: the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act International journal of evidence & proof. 4, 1 (2000), [217] McEwan, J In the box or on the box? The Pigot report and child witnesses. Criminal law review. June (1990). [218] McEwan, J Proving consent in sexual cases: legislative change and cultural evolution. International journal of evidence & proof. 9, 1 (2005). [219] McEwan, J Proving consent in sexual cases: legislative change and cultural evolution. International journal of evidence & proof. 9, 1 (2005), [220] 29/48

30 McEwan, J The rape shield askew? International journal of evidence & proof. 5, 4 (2001). [221] McEwan, Jenny Evidence and the adversarial process: the modern law. Hart. [222] McEwan, Jenny Evidence and the adversarial process: the modern law. Hart. [223] McEwan, Jenny The verdict of the court: passing judgment in law and psychology. Hart. [224] McGourlay, Claire Evidence statutes Routledge. [225] McKay, S Entrapment: competing views on the effect of the Human Rights Act on English criminal law. European human rights law review. 6 (2002). [226] Mike Redmayne A corroboration approach to recovered memories of sexual abuse: a note of caution. Law quarterly review. 116 (2000). [227] Mike Redmayne Drugs, money and relevance. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 3, 2 (1999), [228] 30/48

31 Mike Redmayne Myths, relationships and coincidences: the new problems of sexual history. International journal of evidence & proof. 7, 2 (2003), [229] Mirfield, P Character and credibility. Criminal law review. (2009), [230] Mirfield, P Character, credibility and truthfulness. Law quarterly review. 124, (2008), 1 6. [231] Mirfield, P. Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000: Part 2: evidential aspects. Criminal law review. [232] Mirfield, P. Successive confessions and the poisonous tree. Criminal law review. [233] Mirfield, P. Successive confessions and the poisonous tree. Criminal law review. [234] Mirfield, P. The legacy of Hunt. Criminal law review [235] Mirfield, P.N. Corroboration after the 1994 Act. Criminal law review. [236] Mirfield, Peter Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence. Oxford 31/48

32 University Press. [237] Mirfield, Peter Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence. Clarendon Press. [238] Mirfield, Peter Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence. Oxford University Press. [239] Mirfield, Peter Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence. Clarendon Press. [240] Mirfield, Peter Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence. Clarendon Press. [241] Mirfield, Peter Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence. Clarendon Press. [242] Morgan, Jane and Zedner, Lucia Child victims: crime, impact, and criminal justice. Clarendon. [243] Munday, R Bad character rules and riddles: explanatory notes and true meanings of s.103(1) of the Criminal Justice Act Criminal law review. (2005), /48

33 [244] Munday, R Case management, similar fact evidence in civil cases, and a divided law of evidence. International journal of evidence & proof. 10, 2 (2006), [245] Munday, R. Cut-throat defences and the propensity to be untruthful under s.104 of the Criminal Justice Act Criminal law review [246] Munday, R. Inferences from silence and European human rights law. Criminal law review [247] Munday, R. Inferences from silence and European human rights law. Criminal law review. [248] Munday, R Misconduct that Has to Do with the Alleged Facts of the Offence with which the Defendant Is Charged More or Less. The Journal of Criminal Law. 72, 3 (Jun. 2008), [249] Munday, R Single-act Propensity. The Journal of Criminal Law. 74, 2 (Apr. 2010), [250] Munday, R The purposes of gateway (g): yet another problematic of the Criminal Justice Act Criminal law review. (2006), [251] 33/48

34 Munday, R The quick and the dead: who counts as a person under s.100 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003? Journal of criminal law. 71, 3 (2007), [252] Munday, R. What constitutes other reprehensible behaviour under the bad character provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003? Criminal law review [253] Munday, R Sham marriages and spousal compellability. Journal of criminal law. 65, 4 (2001). [254] Munday, R. J. C Evidence. Oxford University Press. [255] Murphy, P Evidence, proof, and facts: a book of sources. Oxford University Press. [256] Nash, S Secretly recorded conversations and the European Convention on Human Rights: Khan v UK. International journal of evidence &proof. 4, 4 (2000). [257] Nash, S. What s the matter with section 78? Criminal law review [258] no. 273, L.C Evidence of bad character in criminal proceedings. [259] 34/48

35 Ormerod, D. The evolution of the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Criminal law review. [260] Ormerod, D. The evolution of the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Criminal law review. [261] Ormerod, D. The evolution of the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Criminal law review. [262] O Doherty, S Child Witnesses: a decade of progress. Justice of the peace. 162, (1998). [263] P. S. Atiyah Res ipsa loquitur in England and Australia. The modern law review. Vol. 35, No. 4. [264] Pattenden, R Should confessions be corroborated? Law quarterly review. 107, April (1991). [265] Pattenden, R Should confessions be corroborated? Law quarterly review. 107, April (1991). [266] Pattenden, R Silence: Lord Taylor s legacy. International journal of evidence & proof. 2, 3 (1998), /48

36 [267] Pattenden, R Silence: Lord Taylor s legacy. International journal of evidence & proof. 2, 3 (1998), [268] Paul Roberts Drug dealing and the presumption of innocence: The Human Rights Act (almost) bites. International journal of evidence & proof. 6, 1 (2002), [269] Paul Roberts Monitoring success, accounting for failure: the outcome of prosecutors applications for special measures directions under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 9, 4 (2005). [270] Penney Lewis A comparative examination of corroboration and caution warnings in prosecutions of sexual offences. Criminal Law Review. [271] Pigot, Thomas and Advisory Group on Video-Recorded Evidence Report of the Advisory Group on Video-Recorded Evidence. Home Office. [272] Plotnikoff, Joyce and Woolfson, Richard Prosecuting child abuse: an evaluation of the government s speedy progress policy. Blackstone Press. [273] Plotnikoff, Joyce and Woolfson, Richard Prosecuting child abuse: an evaluation of the government s speedy progress policy. Blackstone Press. 36/48

37 [274] Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984:. [275] Police and Justice Act 2006:. [276] Powell, R R (D) v Camberwell Green Youth Court - Child witnesses deemed to be in need of special protection and the European Convention. Child and family law quarterly. 18, 3 (2006), [277] Prevention of Corruption Act 1916:. [278] Prevention of Crime Act 1953:. [279] Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005:. [280] Redmayne, M. Recognising propensity. Criminal law review [281] Redmayne, M The ethics of character evidence. Current legal problems. 61, 1 (Jan. 2008), [282] 37/48

38 Redmayne, M The relevance of bad character. The Cambridge law journal. 61, 03 (Jan. 2003). [283] Redmayne, M The structure of evidence law. Oxford journal of legal studies. 26, 4 (Jan. 2006), [284] Redmayne, Mike Standards of proof in civil litigation. Modern Law Review. 62, 2 (1999). [285] Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000:. [286] Report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Paper 2263:. [287] Road Traffic Act 1988:. [288] Roberts, A Pre-trial defence rights and the fair use of eyewitness identification procedures. Modern law review. 71, 3 (May 2008), [289] Roberts, A The trouble with Teixeira: developing a principled approach to entrapment. International journal of evidence & proof. 6, 1 (2002). [290] 38/48

39 Roberts, P Taking the burden of proof seriously. Criminal law review. Oct (1995), [291] Roberts, P. The presumption of innocence brought home? Kebilene deconstructed. Law quarterly review [292] Roberts, P. and Hunter, J.B Criminal evidence and human rights: reimagining common law procedural traditions. Hart Pub. [293] Roberts, P. and Hunter, J.B Criminal evidence and human rights: reimagining common law procedural traditions. Hart. [294] Roberts, P. and Hunter, J.B Criminal evidence and human rights: reimagining common law procedural traditions. Hart. [295] Roberts, P. and Hunter, J.B Criminal evidence and human rights: reimagining common law procedural traditions. Hart. [296] Roberts, P. and Zuckerman, A.A.S Criminal evidence. Oxford University Press. [297] Roberts, Julian V. and Mohr, Renate M Confronting sexual assault: a decade of legal and social change. University of Toronto Press. 39/48

40 [298] Roberts, Paul and Redmayne, Mike Innovations in evidence and proof: integrating theory, research and teaching. Hart. [299] Roche, D Between rhetoric and reality: sociolegal and republican perspectives on entrapment. International journal of evidence & proof. 4, 2 (2000). [300] Roderick Munday The paradox of cross-examination to credit. Simply too close for comfort. The Cambridge Law Journal. Vol. 53, No. 2. [301] Rosemary Pattenden Using the overtly non-incriminating statement to incriminate: a theoretical framework. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 3, 4 (1999). [302] Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Federal Rules of Evidence LII / Legal Information Institute:. [303] Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons Federal Rules of Evidence LII / Legal Information Institute:. [304] Rumney, P.N.S Male rape in the courtroom: issues and concerns. Criminal law review. Mar (2001), [305] Sally Lloyd-Bostock The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant s previous 40/48

41 criminal record: a simulation study. Criminal Law Review [306] Samuels, A Illegally Obtained Evidence: In or Out. Journal of Criminal Law. 67, 5 (2003), [307] Seabrooke, S More caution needed on s. 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act International journal of evidence & proof. 3, 4 (1999). [308] Seabrooke, S More caution needed on s. 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act International journal of evidence & proof. 3, 4 (1999). [309] Seidmann, D.J. and Stein, A The Right to Silence Helps the Innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege. Harvard Law Review. 114, 2 (Dec. 2000). [310] Seidmann, Daniel J. The right to silence helps the innocent: A game-theoretic analysis of the fifth amendment privilege. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 114, 2. [311] Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976:. [312] Sexual Offences Act 2003:. 41/48

42 [313] Sharpe, S. The European Convention: a suspects charter? Criminal law review [314] Sharpe, Sybil Judicial discretion and criminal investigation. Sweet & Maxwell. [315] Signorelli, W.P Criminal law, procedure, and evidence. CRC Press. [316] Skinns, L The right to legal advice in the police station: past, present and future. Criminal law review. 1 (2011). [317] Soothill, K. et al Murder and Serious Sexual Assault: What Criminal Histories can Reveal about Future Serious Offending. The Home Office. [318] Spencer, J.R Child witnesses and cross-examination at trial: must it continue? Archbold review. 3 (2011), 7 9. [319] Spencer, J.R Child witnesses, video-technology and the law of evidence: Part 1. Criminal law review. February (1987). [320] Spencer, J. R. and Flin, Rhona The evidence of children: the law and the psychology. Blackstone. 42/48

43 [321] Spencer, John R Evidence of bad character. Hart. [322] Spencer, John R. and Lamb, Michael E Children and cross-examination: time to change the rules?. Hart. [323] Stannard, J.E A presumption and four burdens. Northern Ireland legal quarterly. 51, 4 (2000), [324] Stumer, Andrew C The presumption of innocence: evidential and human rights perspectives. Hart Pub. [325] Susan Easton Adverse inferences and the right to silence. International Journal of Evidence & ProofCase Comment. 4, 1 (2000), [326] Susan Easton Legal advice, common sense and the right to silence. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 2, 2 (1998), [327] Susan Nash Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber. International journal of evidence & proof. 9, 1 (2005), [328] 43/48

44 Susan Nash Secretly recorded conversations and the European Convention on Human Rights: Khan v UK. International Journal of Evidence & ProofCase Comment. 4, 4 (2000). [329] Susan Nash What s the matter with section 78? Criminal Law Review. [330] Tadros, V. and Tierney, S The Presumption of Innocence and the Human Rights Act. Modern law review. 67, 3 (May 2004), [331] Tapper, C. Criminal Justice Act 2003: part 3: evidence of bad character. Criminal law review. [332] Tapper, C Fair s fair? International journal of evidence & proof. 12, 1 (2008), [333] Tapper, C. and Cross, R Cross and Tapper on evidence. Oxford University Press. [334] Taylor, A The competence of children. Justice of the peace and local government law. (1997). [335] Taylor, N. Mind the gaps: safety, fairness and moral legitimacy. Criminal law review /48

45 [336] Taylor, Richard D. et al Blackstone s guide to the Criminal Justice Act Oxford University Press. [337] Temkin, J Reporting Rape in London: A Qualitative Study. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 38, 1 (Feb. 1999), [338] Temkin, Jennifer Rape and the legal process. Oxford University Press. [339] Temkin, Jennifer and Krahâe, Barbara Sexual assault and the justice gap: a question of attitude. Hart. [340] Terrorism Act 2000:. [341] The Magistrates Courts (Special Measures Directions) Rules 2002:. [342] Timothy H. Jones Insanity, automatism, and the burden of proof on the accused. Law Quarterly Review [343] Tinsley, Y Even better than the real thing? The case for reform of identification procedures. International journal of evidence & proof. 5, 2 (2001). 45/48

46 [344] Twining, William Rethinking evidence: exploratory essays. Northwestern University Press. [345] Twining, William and Stein, Alex Evidence and proof. Dartmouth Pub.Co. [346] Uglow, S. The Human Rights Act 1998: Part 4: covert surveillance and the European Convention on Human Rights. Criminal law review. [347] Vahit Bicak, A.V Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, S. 76 (2): Re-emergence of the Involuntariness Test. Journal of criminal law. 65, 2 (2001), [348] Vulnerable Defendants in the Criminal Courts: A Review of Provision for Adults and Children:. [349] Wade, A. and Lawson, A Stories in Court - Video-Taped Interviews and the Production of Children s Testimony Research. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 10, 2 (1998), [350] Walker, C.P Terrorist offences: Terrorism Act 2000 s.11(1) - belonging to proscribed organisation. Criminal law review. Dec (2005), [351] Ward, T The privilege against self incrimination: in search of legal certainty. 46/48

47 European human rghts law review. 4, (2003), [352] Ward, T The privilege against self incrimination: in search of legal certainty. European human rights law review. 4, (2003). [353] Waterman, A. Bad character: feeling our way one year on. Criminal law review [354] Wilcock, Rachel et al Witness identification in criminal cases: psychology and practice. Oxford University Press. [355] Wilson, W. Violence, sleepwalking and the criminal law: Part 2: the legal aspects. Criminal law review [356] Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999:. [357] Zuckerman, A The Third exception to the rule in Woolmington. The Law quarterly review. 92, (1976). [358] Zuckerman, A.A.S. No third exception to the Woolmington rule. Law quarterly review (Case Comment). 103, /48

48 [359] Criminal Law Review. [360] International journal of evidence & proof. [361] Sexual Abuse: standards of proof. Family law. (1994). [362] The European Convention on Human Rights Article 14(2). [363] The European Convention on Human Rights Article 6(1). 48/48