Response of the Law Society of England and Wales to draft CPS guidance for consultation on 'Speaking to Witnesses at Court'
|
|
- Calvin Murphy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Response of the Law Society of England and Wales to draft CPS guidance for consultation on 'Speaking to Witnesses at Court' March 2015 The Law Society 2015 Page 1 of 7
2 Response of the Law Society of England and Wales to draft CPS guidance for consultation on 'Speaking to Witnesses at Court' Introduction The Law Society of England and Wales ('the Society') is the representative body for over 159,000 solicitors in England and Wales. It negotiates on behalf of the profession, and lobbies regulators, government and others. This response has been prepared on behalf of the Society by members of its specialist Criminal Law Committee. The Committee is drawn from a wide range of criminal law backgrounds, including prosecution and defence solicitors, a justices' clerk representative and an academic lawyer. The Society very much agrees that all witnesses who are required to attend court should be treated with dignity and respect, given that the experience is likely to be an unfamiliar, and in many cases, an unpleasant and traumatic experience, particularly where they are the victim of an offence. They should be supported by professional witness care staff and prosecutors at court; cases should be listed, as far as possible, to take into account their availability, convenience and any special needs; and they should be thanked for their time. The Society has on many occasions urged that trial listing practices should move away from the double and triple listing of cases in the interests of witnesses having the case dealt with as soon as possible. It can only add to their inconvenience and trauma if a witness has prepared to give evidence on a particular date, only to be told it has been deferred due to court unavailability. We therefore support most of the guidance to prosecutors, and agree that particular care and time needs to be taken to make sure witnesses understand what will happen in court. However, it is not only essential that the CPS is properly resourced to enable its in-house lawyers and independent advocates to explain court procedures and the roles of the various participants; they must also be able to ensure that court orders are complied with in a timely way, and that evidence that should be disclosed to the defence is disclosed to avoid ineffective trials and adjournments, which also cause unnecessary inconvenience and distress to witnesses. Many of the recommendations made by the President of the Queen's Bench Division in his recent review of the efficiency of criminal proceedings seek this outcome - in essence 'getting it right first time' - and are supported by the Society. Also essential is the need for effective support, appropriate to the needs of the particular complainant or witness, to be available at all stages of the investigation, and particularly at court, and for prosecutors to be aware of these services. The level and type of support will vary according to the seriousness and nature of the offence with which the witness is concerned and also local resources at a particular court. Indeed, such support should also be provided to relatives of victims and witnesses, for example, the mother of a child sexual assault victim. The availability of Independent Sexual Assault Advisors, and Independent Domestic Violence Advisors to assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims is welcomed, and we agree with the guidance that prosecutors should be familiar with these supporters' role and actively engage with them. Likewise, prosecutors should be familiar with and inform witnesses of the practical support and information that is offered by the Witness Service. Police Family Liaison Officers provide essential support to the families of homicide victims. The CPS must encourage its prosecutors to help witnesses access these services, so as to provide maximum support and assistance to help victims, witnesses and families through an unfamiliar, and often harrowing, experience at court. The Law Society 2015 Page 2 of 7
3 However, for reasons set out below, the Society does not agree that witnesses should be informed of the general nature of the defence case. While we agree that the criminal trial process is not a game, it is important to bear in mind that in England and Wales the process is adversarial, and is conducted orally with the witness (usually) present in court. This is because the responses, reactions and demeanour of a witness when giving evidence, particularly when challenged in cross-examination, should be seen by the jury or bench; it is in this way that the accuracy and veracity of the witness is assessed. If the witness is made aware of even the general nature of the defence case there is a significant risk that some witnesses will tailor or embellish their evidence to meet that case. There is a balance to be stuck between providing information to the witness that may improve their experience in giving evidence, on the one hand, and risking the fairness of the trial by alerting the witness in advance to those aspects of their evidence which are challenged, on the other. The Proposed Guidance Part 3 of the draft guidance includes an extract from CPS Guidance on the Care and Treatment of Victims and Witnesses, which the Society fully supports: witnesses should be treated with respect and sensitivity; prosecutors should introduce themselves; nervous or vulnerable witnesses should be put at ease; court procedures should be explained; they should be informed of delays; and they should be released as soon as possible after giving evidence. We agree that all the issues that are then explicitly set out in sections (a) Introductory Matters, (b) Providing Assistance about Procedure, and (c) Providing Assistance about Giving Evidence are permissible, and indeed sensible matters, for prosecutors to raise with the witness. They are all matters about which the witness, as a matter of common sense, should be informed. For example, it is simply common courtesy to introduce oneself, and there is no reason why doing so would affect the witness's evidence or the fairness of the trial. Likewise, explaining the court's procedure, oath taking, the order in which questions are asked, and that they can ask for a break are all likely to assist the witness to know what to expect and will not affect their evidence, nor the fairness of the trial. Indeed, many prosecutors proactively request the judge to allow the witness a break if it becomes apparent the witness is tiring or needs to compose themself emotionally. Perhaps most importantly, we agree that it is appropriate for the prosecutor to explain to the witness the role of the defence advocate; that it is their job to put their client's case and challenge the prosecution version of events, and to suggest the witness is mistaken or lying. We further agree that explaining why this may occur is permissible, that is, telling the witness that this is how the jury or magistrates will decide the issues in the case, by seeing and hearing their reaction when the opposing case is put. We would suggest that if such an explanation of the role of the defence advocate is provided the witness will then have sufficient understanding of the process of, and the reason for, cross-examination. There would then be no need to go further and inform the witness of the nature of the defence case, which creates the risk that the witness may tailor their evidence and thus imperil the fairness of the trial. We agree that the witness should be informed of all matters listed in (c): to listen to questions carefully, to ask for questions to be repeated or rephrased, to answer truthfully, The Law Society 2015 Page 3 of 7
4 and to say so if they're unable to answer a question. The ability to refresh their memory from their statement should also be explained. Section 3 (d) and (f) of the guidance on updating the witness, and when the witnesses has completed their evidence, are further sensible aspects of good practice that we agree should be encouraged. Providing Assistance for Cross-examination The first paragraph of section 3(d) provides a very clear explanation of the purpose of crossexamination within the adversarial system - to cast doubt, to put pressure on witnesses, to attack their character to reduce their credibility, and that it may address deeply personal aspects of the witness's life. We agree that some witnesses will be better than others at anticipating the type of cross-examination they will face, depending on the context of the case and on their intellectual capacity; other witness may be less capable or otherwise vulnerable. We do not, however, agree that this justifies departing from the general rule that advocates should not disclose even the general nature of the defence case to prosecution witnesses. There is considerable danger that if the victim is informed of the general nature of the defence case their instinctive reaction in the witness box when they are confronted with the defence case will be lost. This is a very telling part in assessing the witness's demeanour, and if they are warned in advance that element is likely to be lost. Moreover, it is not clear that the evidence of the witness would either be improved by knowing the nature of the defence, nor that it would increase their satisfaction and/or cause less distress. The first response of the witness to the defence case, which can often be quite physical, when it's put to the witness is very important in assessing the witness's veracity; this can only be ascertained by the jury or magistrates by observing their demeanour in court. If this element of surprise is removed by informing the witness beforehand is lost, it will allow the witness to 'dig in their heels' and to attempt not give an objective account of what they saw, heard etc. The quality of their evidence would be diminished as a result. Preventing the jury from seeing the spontaneous reaction of an honest witness may damage their credibility. This is a danger even where the witness is telling the truth; but if the witness is dishonest and lying, or embellishing the truth, knowing the nature of the defence may make it easier for the witness to maintain the falsehood or embellishment in the witness box. Informing such a witness of the nature of the defence, and depriving the jury of their initial reaction, may make it easier for the dishonest witness to lie. If the witness is in fact giving truthful testimony, it could undermine their credibility in the eyes of the jury were they to make known that they had been informed of the defence case; it may suggest that the witness's answers were rehearsed. Serious problems will arise if the witness were to say: I have tailored my evidence because I was told what the nature of the defence is. Where the witness is informed in advance that a particular defence is in issue, this could be seen as 'tipping off' the witness so that they could tailor, consciously or unconsciously, their evidence to rebut the defence. Informing the witness of even the general nature of the defence case - consent, identity, selfdefence - will create a risk that the witness will tailor their evidence to meet that case. If The Law Society 2015 Page 4 of 7
5 identity is in issue, the witness may attempt to appear more sure of the accuracy of their identification that they otherwise would have been; if its a question of self-defence, the witness may, either consciously or unconsciously, exaggerate or emphasise certain aspects of their evidence. We do not agree with the assertion in the guidance that this is not impermissible witness coaching, as considered by the Court of Appeal in Momodou and Limani. In paragraph 61 in discussing the rationale for the rule against witness coaching, the Court states that: '...The witness should give his or her own evidence, so far as practicable uninfluenced by what anyone else has said, whether in formal discussions or informal conversations. The rule reduces, indeed hopefully avoids any possibility, that one witness may tailor his evidence in the light of what anyone else said, and equally, avoids any unfounded perception that he may have done so. These risks are inherent in witness training' (emphasis added). We acknowledge that the Momodou case concerned a situation in which prosecution witnesses were at risk of learning in detail what other prosecution witnesses would say, in the context of a serious detention centre disturbance. However, to inform a (prosecution) witness of even the general nature of the defence case makes it possible that the witness may be influenced by what someone else (i.e. the defendant) has said, and creates the possibility that the witness may tailor their evidence accordingly. Experienced defence lawyers know not to tell defence witnesses what the defendant is intending to say, because there is a danger that if the defence witness was told they may change or tailor their evidence, even sub-consciously, in order to help the defendant. In order to maximise their credibly as a witness, those called for the defence should not be informed of the defendant's case, but only asked to relate what it is they saw, heard or otherwise experienced which is relevant to the defence case. There is an equality of arms issue. The recorded police interview of the defendant will usually be before the jury, which will include the defendant's first reaction to the allegations. However, at that stage in the investigation the police will often withhold much of their case from the suspect. The accused's initial reaction to the allegation will thus be before the jury; whereas, if allowed, the witness will have been informed of the defence case in advance, and will be able to moderate their reaction. There is a wider risk that, by introducing this change, the adversarial system of criminal justice will move towards a more inquisitorial system. In English and Welsh criminal law it is a fundamental principle that the State brings the prosecution, with witnesses being called to support the prosecution case. Whilst it is of course important to make the giving of evidence as 'pain free' for witnesses as possible, care must be taken to ensure the case is not seen to be the witness or complainant's case. The evidence of the witness - of what they experienced, saw or heard - must be given dispassionately and objectively in order to prove the case against the accused. On a practical level, where the defendant exercised his right to silence and/or no Defence Statement has been served, it is likely to be difficult for prosecutors to know what the 'general nature' of the defence case is, and when asked inevitable follow-up questions by the witness, it will be difficult know what, if any, more detail could be given. To refuse to elaborate may confuse and distress the witness more than not informing them would do. We note the guidance states that 'it is important that prosecutors should not provide the detail of, The Law Society 2015 Page 5 of 7
6 discuss or speculate upon the specific question a witness is likely to face or discuss with them how to answer questions'; however, to refuse to give further details may cause the witness more anxiety than not raising the general nature of the defence would do. There are likely to be problems in working out the 'general nature' of the defence case in a multi-handed case where defences may differ between the accused; what is the 'general nature' in the event of a complex set of defences? In our view, if asked why the witness is having to attend court to give evidence, aside from explaining the role of the defence advocate and that they may or will challenge the prosecution case/evidence, the prosecutor should go no further than to tell the witnesses that the court requires you to give oral evidence. Third party material, bad character and evidence of sexual history In relation to section d(ii) and (iii) we consider that there is nothing objectionable in informing a witness that third party material about the witness has been disclosed to the defence, or that the court has granted leave for bad character or sexual history evidence to be adduced. However, great care will need to be taken by prosecutors in informing witnesses of these matters, as to do so will create a risk that the witness will feel worse and more upset about giving evidence. If such matters are to be disclosed in advance of the witness giving evidence, it must be done in a very sensitive and case-specific way, depending on the situation and the prosecutor's assessment of the particular witness in question. Training needs It may be that a wider training need will be identified arising from the introduction of the guidance; inexperienced prosecutors may blur the boundaries between appropriate witness support and impermissible coaching. The CPS currently instruct a significant number of newly qualified agents who, along with the self-employed bar, will presumably not receive CPS training on any new guidance. We suggest that this should be considered. Consultation questions 1. Does the guidance cover the key issues that impact upon the victim or witness's experience at court? If not, what other subject areas might be covered? It may be useful if the guidance was to provide information to witnesses about reclaiming a witness's out-of-pocket expenses, such as which agency is responsible and how they should make a claim. 2. Does the guidance strike the right balance between supporting the witness in advance of their appearance in court and ensuring that the trial is, and is seen to be, fair to the defendant? Most of the guidance will result in prosecution witnesses who are better supported and informed about the process of giving evidence and will not affect, nor be seen to affect, the right of a defendant to a fair trial. However, as set out above, the Society does not agree with the proposal that witnesses should be informed of the general nature of the defence case. The Law Society 2015 Page 6 of 7
7 3. Does the guidance set out clearly what a prosecutor should do when meeting a witness at court? Is there anything else that might be done? Yes, it does. We are unable to think of anything further that might be done. 4. Does the guidance give enough information regarding other support services at court? The final section on 'court supporters' appears to be comprehensive. This may be an appropriate place to remind the prosecutor to raise the issue of how the witness should go about reclaiming any witness expenses. It may be that the Witness Service will be best placed to provide further information about expense claims. The Law Society 2015 Page 7 of 7
Prosecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify
This guide is a gift of the United States Government PRACTICE GUIDE Prosecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify AT A GLANCE Intended Audience: Prosecutors working
More informationWitness Preparation. Introduction
Witness Preparation Purpose To assist barristers to identify what is permissible by way of factual and expert witness familiarisation and preparation, in both civil and criminal cases Overview Prohibition
More informationA Guide to Giving Evidence in Court
Preparation A Guide to Giving Evidence in Court It doesn't matter whether you have a lot of experience or a little - you may find that the witness box is a lonely place if you are not prepared for it.
More informationRESPONSE by FACULTY OF ADVOCATES To Pre-Recording evidence of Child and Other Vulnerable Witnesses
RESPONSE by FACULTY OF ADVOCATES To Pre-Recording evidence of Child and Other Vulnerable Witnesses The Faculty of Advocates is the professional body to which advocates belong. The Faculty welcomes the
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationCROWN LAW VICTIMS OF CRIME GUIDANCE FOR PROSECUTORS
CROWN LAW VICTIMS OF CRIME As at 6 December 2014 CONTENTS Purpose... 1 Victims of Crime... 1 Principles... 1 Role of Prosecutor... 1 Information about Proceedings... 2 Assistance for Victims... 2 Vulnerable
More informationWhat happens at a Crown Court trial - The prosecution case.
What happens at a Crown Court trial - The prosecution case. Please note that in the Crown Court you can be represented by either a barrister or a solicitor advocate. Representation is the single most important
More informationExamination of witnesses
Examination of witnesses Rules and procedures in the courtroom for eliciting (getting information) from witnesses Most evidence in our legal system is verbal. A person conveying their views and beliefs,
More information.. HOW TO PREPARE YOUR WITNESS FOR AN EXAMINATION FOR DISCOVERY
.. HOW TO PREPARE YOUR WITNESS FOR AN EXAMINATION FOR DISCOVERY )., The~ematerialswerepreparedby Murray Hinds, of Woloshyn & Company law firm Saskatoon,.Saskatchewan for the Saskatchewan Legal Education
More information-1- NOTES TO A WITNESS AT AN ARBITRATION HEARING
-1- NOTES TO A WITNESS AT AN ARBITRATION HEARING As a witness, you will be playing a very important role in the upcoming hearing. Through you, we present the facts that are essential to our case. Please
More informationLegal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE
Legal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE Director, Centre for Professional Legal Studies Strathclyde University Outline of Presentation 1. Introduction
More informationThe criminal justice system cannot function without the participation of witnesses like you.
Your Role as a Witness in a Criminal Case The criminal justice system cannot function without the participation of witnesses like you. The information you provide is evidence that helps police solve crimes
More informationThe Criminalisation of Victims of Trafficking
The Criminalisation of Victims of Trafficking Legal Framework The UK is bound by the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings referred to as the Trafficking Convention.
More informationOBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!
OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR! ROBERT S. HARRISON JENNIFER McALEER FASKEN MARTINEAU DuMOULIN LLP THE BASICS What is an Objection? By definition an objection is an interruption. It should only be made when it is
More informationA GUIDE. for. to assist with LIAISON AND THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. when there are simultaneous
A GUIDE for THE POLICE THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE LOCAL SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN BOARDS to assist with LIAISON AND THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION when there are simultaneous CHAPTER 8 SERIOUS CASE REVIEWS
More informationNotes and Observations to the questions relating to Criminal Legal Aid
Notes and Observations to the questions relating to Criminal Legal Aid Question 24: Do you agree with the proposals to: pay a single fixed fee of 565 for a guilty plea in an either way case which the magistrates
More informationSIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy
More informationDOMESTIC NOISE CONTROL A GUIDE TO LEGAL ACTION
DOMESTIC NOISE CONTROL A GUIDE TO LEGAL ACTION Cardiff County Council, Regulatory Services, City Hall, Cardiff. CF10 3ND. Tel. (029) 2087 1650. \\valeofglamorgan\sharetree\shared Regulatory Services\SRS
More informationGoing. A booklet for children and young people who are going to be witnesses at Crown, magistrates or youth court
Going to court A booklet for children and young people who are going to be witnesses at Crown, magistrates or youth court This book should be read with the assistance of an adult supporter who knows about
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2017 The goal of this 2018 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy
More informationThe Code. for Crown Prosecutors
The Code for Crown Prosecutors January 2013 Introduction 1.1 The Code for Crown Prosecutors (the Code) is issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under section 10 of the Prosecution of Offences
More informationPRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100
PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CACI No. 100 You have now been sworn as jurors in this case. I want to impress on you the seriousness and importance of serving on a jury. Trial by jury is a fundamental right in
More informationWho s who in a Criminal Trial
Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being
More informationJustice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission the Law Society of Scotland
Justice Committee Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill Written submission the Law Society of Scotland Introduction The Law Society of Scotland aims to lead and support a successful and respected Scottish legal
More informationCriminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Act 2014 No 83
New South Wales Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Act 2014 No 83 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 New South Wales Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURT (CHAMBER) CASE OF ISGRÒ v. ITALY (Application no. 11339/85) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 February
More informationIntroduction. Deciding to report abuse. Reporting to police
Introduction One of the hardest processes for abuse survivors is coming forward and reporting their experiences to the police, despite the fact that seeking a criminal prosecution against an abuser can
More informationA PROTOCOL ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION SETTING OUT THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE VICTIMS ADVOCATE PILOT AREAS
A PROTOCOL ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION SETTING OUT THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE VICTIMS ADVOCATE PILOT AREAS General Principles This protocol provides a description of
More informationLaw Commission. EVIDENCE OF BAD CHARACTER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A Summary
Law Commission EVIDENCE OF BAD CHARACTER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A Summary Law Com No 273 (Summary) 9 October 2001 EVIDENCE OF BAD CHARACTER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A Summary 1. Bad character may arise
More informationLondon Criminal Courts Solicitors Association. Response to the Sentencing Advisory Panel Consultation Paper on Bail Act Offences
London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association Response to the Sentencing Advisory Panel Consultation Paper on Bail Act Offences 1 The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) represents the
More informationAdvice on the Structure of Visually Recorded Witness Interviews (2 nd Edition)
Advice on the Structure of Visually Recorded Witness Interviews (2 nd Edition) National Investigative Interviewing Strategic Steering Group October 2013 First edition published in August 2010. Second edition
More informationCode of Practice Issued Under Section 377A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Code of Practice Issued Under Section 377A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Presented to Parliament under section 377A(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Code of Practice Issued Under Section 377A
More informationSensitive and Personal Records
Victim support Sensitive and Personal Records Information for victims of sexual crimes COPFS Policy on Obtaining Sensitive and Personal Records for use in Criminal Prosecutions This leaflet explains why
More informationTHE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION
THE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER CORROBORATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER No 3/2008/CP December 2008 The Jersey Law Commission was set up by a Proposition
More informationA Guide for Teachers & Students Visiting the Court
A Guide for Teachers & Students Visiting the Court 1 Overview Students should be aware that they are in a real court, where decisions will be made affecting the lives of real people. Some of these decisions
More informationPart V Code Amendments, draft guidance
Part V Code Amendments, draft guidance Investigating or collecting evidence and taking witness statements 1. There is no longer a rule which prohibits a self-employed barrister from investigating or collecting
More informationFRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.
I. Deposition Goals A. Each deposition and each deposition question should be aimed at accomplishing a desired result. 1. Determine knowledge of relevant facts and pin down lack of knowledge of relevant
More informationV.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS
V.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS (Note: Some of the advice provided below is applicable primarily in personal injury cases. Practitioners will wish to tailor these instructions to suit particular cases.)
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Coss [2016] QCA 44 PARTIES: R v COSS, Michael Joseph (appellant/applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 111 of 2015 DC No 113 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT:
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT. Courtroom Testimony & Demeanor. Clinical Coordinator Training
STATE OF CONNECTICUT Court Support Services Division Division of Criminal Justice Courtroom Testimony & Demeanor Clinical Coordinator Training Prepared by: Francis J. Carino, Supervisory Assistant State
More informationVulnerable Witnesses (Criminal Evidence) (Scotland) Bill
SPICe Briefing Pàipear-ullachaidh SPICe Vulnerable Witnesses (Criminal Evidence) (Scotland) Bill Frazer McCallum This Scottish Government bill sets out reforms relating to the use of special measures in
More informationRESPONSE BY THE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND A SCOTTISH SENTENCING COUNCIL
1 RESPONSE BY THE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND A SCOTTISH SENTENCING COUNCIL The Sheriffs Association welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation
More informationHelping people with learning disabilities who go to court
Being a witness Helping people with learning disabilities who go to court A guide for carers Being a witness Helping people with learning disabilities who go to court A guide for carers i Written by ENABLE
More informationINITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT
INITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT November 2011 For further information contact Maggie Scott QC; Jodie Blackstock, Director of Criminal and EU Justice Policy Email: scottish.justice@advocates.org.uk
More informationJustice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Victim Support Scotland
Justice Committee Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill Written submission from Victim Support Scotland INTRODUCTION 1. Victim Support Scotland welcomes the introduction of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill.
More informationIntroduction. Analysis
1 Additional Views of Bill McCollum, Chairman Subcommittee on Crime, Committee on the Judiciary Regarding the Articles of Impeachment of President Clinton December 15, 1998 Introduction I have carefully
More informationIMPROVE JUSTICE : INQUISITORIAL OR ADVERSARY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (Vilnius, Lithuania 23 April) * * * * * * * * *
1 IMPROVE JUSTICE : INQUISITORIAL OR ADVERSARY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (Vilnius, Lithuania 23 April) NATIONAL REPORTS : Mr. Dominique Inchauspé, France. The main concern is that, very often, most of the lawyers
More informationPreparing Your Employees to be Witnesses in Civil Cases
Preparing Your Employees to be Witnesses in Civil Cases ACC West Central Florida Chapter Corporate Counsel Symposium Longboat Key Club August 19, 2011 Presented by Fowler White Boggs P.A. Bob Olsen, Tampa
More informationHow to Conduct a Hearing on the Merits Part 2 of a 4-Lecture Series on the Basics for ALJs
Part 2 of a 4-Lecture Series on the Basics for ALJs Presentation by Paul Keeper, retired ALJ This paper provides an administrative law judge (ALJ) with a brief overview of how to conduct a hearing on the
More informationTestifying 201. We will cover today 12/19/2012. CASA Advocacy Skills Seminar December 19, 2012 Charles G. Childress, Attorney at Law
Testifying 201 CASA Advocacy Skills Seminar December 19, 2012 Charles G. Childress, Attorney at Law We will cover today CASA s right to testify Best Interest and testifying to support your best interest
More informationHow to obtain permission... 17
Use of video link, telephone evidence and special measures at Medical Practitioners Tribunal hearings Guidance for Decision Makers, Parties and Representatives DC4252 1 Contents Introduction... 3 When
More informationA GUIDE TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2015 (S.I. 2015/1490)
A GUIDE TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2015 (S.I. 2015/1490) Where to find the new Rules The Criminal Procedure Rules 2015 are at this address: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1490/contents/made
More informationGuidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, the use of special measures, and the provision of pre-trial therapy.
Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, the use of special measures, and the provision of pre-trial therapy. January 2012 Contents Overview 1.1
More informationFlashcards BEST PRACTICE GUIDE TO FAIR TRIAL STANDARDS IN SIERRA LEONE
Flashcards BEST PRACTICE GUIDE TO FAIR TRIAL STANDARDS IN SIERRA LEONE Contents 1: Accused Persons These flashcards provide a concise summary of the key human rights standards and obligations that Judges,
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014
LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key
More informationPolice Station Advice Advising on Silence
6873 Crim Practitioners Guide 13/1/06 3:55 pm Page 1 Police Station Advice Advising on Silence by Professor Ed Cape on behalf of the Law Society Criminal Law Committee Criminal Practitioners Newsletter
More informationUSALSA Report U.S. Army Legal Services Agency. Trial Judiciary Note. Claiming Privilege Against Self-Incrimination During Cross-Examination
USALSA Report U.S. Army Legal Services Agency Trial Judiciary Note Claiming Privilege Against Self-Incrimination During Cross-Examination Lieutenant Colonel Fansu Ku * Introduction At a general court-martial
More informationGoing to court. A booklet for children and young people who are going to be witnesses at Crown, magistrates or youth court
Going to court A booklet for children and young people who are going to be witnesses at Crown, magistrates or youth court 5051688011814 This booklet tells you: 1 2 3 4 What a witness does Who will be
More informationIn his report into the failure of the authorities to properly disclose material in the Mouncher case, Richard Horwell QC said:
January 2018 Foreword The legitimacy of our criminal justice system relies on the process being fair and even-handed. The public rightly expects to see the guilty convicted, but it is equally important
More informationTransforming legal aid: delivering a more credible and efficient system
Transforming legal aid: delivering a more credible and efficient system Response of the Bar Standards Board Introduction 1. This is the response of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), the independent regulator
More informationVictims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL]
Victims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL] CONTENTS 1 Overview 2 Victims 3 Victims code of practice 4 Enforcement of the victims code of practice Area victims
More informationCash Seizure and Forfeiture
Cash Seizure and Forfeiture Kirwans is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No: 71723. VAT No: 595 5994 62 Cash Seizure and Forfeiture Welcome to the Kirwans Guide on Cash Seizure and Forfeiture.
More informationLAW550 Litigation Final Exam Notes
LAW550 Litigation Final Exam Notes Important Provisions to Keep in Mind... 2 Voir Dire... 2 Adducing of Evidence Ch 2 Evidence Act... 4 Calling Witnesses... 8 Examination of witnesses... 11 Cross-Examination...
More informationEthical Limits in Witness Preparation. Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017
Ethical Limits in Witness Preparation Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017 Ethical limits in Witness Preparation The line between permissible conduct and impermissible coaching is like the difference between
More informationi. complainants in respect of a sexual offence; or complainants in respect of an offence under sections 1 or 2 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015,
GUIDANCE 1 ON THE USE OF S.28 YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999; PRE RECORDING OF CROSS EXAMINATION AND RE EXAMINATION FOR WITNESSES CAPTURED BY S.17(4) YJCEA 1999 1. When section 28 of the
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) High Court Ref No: 13858 Goodwood Case No: C1658/2012 In the matter between: STATE And RAYMOND TITUS ACCUSED Coram: BINNS-WARD & ROGERS
More informationIn their own words. Executive summary. The experiences of 50 young witnesses in criminal proceedings. Policy Practice Research Series
Policy Practice Research Series Executive summary In their own words The experiences of 50 young witnesses in criminal proceedings The NSPCC in partnership with Victim Support by Joyce Plotnikoff and Richard
More informationEthics and Values: The Criminal Justice System. Version 2.2
Ethics and Values: The Criminal Justice System Version 2.2 - College of Policing Limited (the College) June 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, modified, amended, stored
More informationDonoghue v Stevenson MiniTrial SCLR Edition. MiniTrial Starter Pack Chapter 2 The Student Handout
MiniTrial Starter Pack Chapter 2 The Student Handout MiniTrial Procedure To run your MiniTrial: decide who is to play which role see the list of participants below, decide on a timetable for the various
More informationEmployment Tribunal Rules: review by Mr Justice Underhill - response form
Employment Tribunal Rules: review by Mr Justice Underhill - response form The Department may, in accordance with the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information, make available, on public request,
More informationGiving a witness statement to the police what happens next?
Giving a witness statement to the police what happens next? 2 Thank you for coming forward. We value your help. The criminal justice system cannot work without witnesses.they are the most important element
More informationDefending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea
Defending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea The ideal solution when you have been charged with a criminal offence is to allow a lawyer to handle your case. However, if the matter is reasonably simple
More informationLaw Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response
Law Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response January 2018 The Law Society 2018 Page 1 of 12 Introduction The Law Society of England and Wales ( The Society ) is the professional
More informationThe Witness and the Justice System in Alberta
The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta Introduction This booklet provides basic information about appearing as a witness in the courts of Alberta. It is designed to explain your role as a witness,
More informationJudicial Protocol on the implementation of section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: Pre-recording of crossexamination
Judicial Protocol on the implementation of section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: Pre-recording of crossexamination and reexamination September 2014 Contents Contents Background
More information1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal. accusation or indictment, no defense attorney shall be allowed to represent
Form TJ-110, INSTRUCTION FOR CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS (Sections 6, 7, and 16, Rule 3, of the JSR) Recommendation: 1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal accusation or
More informationIN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 37/06 ARC 111/05
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 37/06 ARC 111/05 IN THE MATTER of a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to declare a witness hostile
More informationGoing to Court. A DVD and booklet for young witnesses
Going to Court A DVD and booklet for young witnesses We have prepared this booklet for young witnesses in criminal cases but other people may also find it useful. It explains what a witness is, what a
More informationSubmission to the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee. Victims of Crime Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016
Submission to the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee Victims of Crime Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 16 January 2016 1 Introduction knowmore is an independent, national
More informationYOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation or
More informationREPORT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE CONSULTATION ON CHANGES TO THE CRIMINAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SCHEME AND THE PEER REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THE NEW CYCLE
THE SCOTTISH LEGAL AID BOARD CRIMINAL QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE 15 NOVEMBER 2018 REPORT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE CONSULTATION ON CHANGES TO THE CRIMINAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SCHEME AND THE PEER REVIEW CRITERIA
More informationDate of communication: 5 February 1987 (date of initial letter)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Robinson v. Jamaica Communication No. 223/1987 30 March 1989 VIEWS Submitted by: Frank Robinson Alleged victim: The author State party concerned: Jamaica Date of communication: 5
More informationMULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A
MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A 2010 Second Semester Assignment 1 Question 1 If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first of all search
More informationAgency Disclosure Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement Order of inquiries to determine fitness to stand trial under the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement
More informationA GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE
A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE THE AIM OF THIS BOOKLET IS TO PROVIDE SOME ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE CONTENTS 02
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015
LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points
More informationNOTES FOR GUIDANCE. RESTRICTED (when completed) Rev 10/13 Page 1 of 9 (Criminal Procedure Rules, rule 6.31; SECTION 2, Criminal Justice Act 1987)
Page 1 of 9 (Criminal Procedure Rules, rule 6.31; SECTION 2, Criminal Justice Act 1987) 1. Use of this form This form is for use in connection with an application by a member of the Serious Fraud Office
More informationCC Mick Creedon QPM National Investigative Interviewing Strategic Steering Group
Advice on the Structure of Visually Recorded Witness Interviews (3 rd Edition) The (NPCC) with the College of Policing has agreed to this revised strategy being circulated to, and adopted by, Police Forces
More informationNo Returns Protocol. The rationale for this recommended approach
No Returns Protocol The rationale for this recommended approach 1. The criminal justice system relies heavily on the traditional practice of barristers working cooperatively with their colleagues by covering
More informationGetting it Right First Time Case Ownership Duty of Direct Engagement Consistent judicial case management
1. Better Case Management (BCM) links certain key complementary initiatives, which together should improve the way cases are processed through the system, for the benefit of all concerned within the criminal
More informationBefore : THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES LORD JUSTICE GROSS and MR JUSTICE MITTING Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Crim 2434 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM CAMBRIDGE CROWN COURT His Honour Judge Hawksworth T20117145 Before : Case No: 2012/02657 C5 Royal
More informationANZRPTIP 1 ACTING AS AN EXPERT WITNESS. Please view the video for this Technical Information Paper on YouTube
ANZRPTIP 1 ACTING AS AN EXPERT WITNESS Please view the video for this Technical Information Paper on YouTube View and download the Resource Pack, ANZRPRP 1 A&NZ Valuation and Property Standards Technical
More informationHealth service complaints
Health service complaints Mental Capacity Health service complaints Contents Complaints v legal proceedings 1 The complaints procedure 1 Who can make a complaint? 2 Time limits 2 Complaints not required
More informationTake the example of a witness who gives identification evidence. French CJ, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ stated at [50]:
Implications of IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14 Stephen Odgers The High Court has determined (by a 4:3 majority) that a trial judge, in assessing the probative value of evidence for the purposes of a number
More informationHANDBOOK FOR VICTIMS/WITNESSES OF VIOLENT CRIMES
HANDBOOK FOR VICTIMS/WITNESSES OF VIOLENT CRIMES Thank you for your cooperation and hard work as a victim/witness. TABLE OF CONTENTS Illinois Crime Victims Bill of Rights Introduction General Information
More informationPolice stations. What happens when you are arrested
Police stations What happens when you are arrested This factsheet looks at what happens at the police station when the police think you have committed a crime. This factsheet may help you if you, or someone
More informationCriminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court
Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court Contents Part 1 Underpinning knowledge...3 1.1 An understanding
More informationTRIAL DIRECTIONS FOR THE LOCAL COURT ADVOCATE
TRIAL DIRECTIONS FOR THE LOCAL COURT ADVOCATE A paper prepared for the Legal Aid Annual Criminal Law Conference 2014 Slade Howell 1 & Daniel Covington 2 The operation of the general principles have a significance
More informationGovernors Adjudications. Easy Read Self Help Toolkit
Governors Adjudications Easy Read Self Help Toolkit About this document This document was made by CHANGE, a charity led by people with learning disabilities. This document uses easy words and pictures
More informationF.A.O.: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees and the All Party Parliamentary
F.A.O.: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Migration Re: Submission for the Parliamentary Inquiry into the use of immigration detention in the UK Dear
More information