Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,"

Transcription

1 Index References in this index from 900 to 911 are to sections of the Wisconsin Rules of Evidence, and references from 1 to 33 are to chapters of this book. A Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice, Admissibility Limited purpose, Preliminary questions on, Relevance, rules governing, Admission of Evidence Relevance, rules governing, Admissions By party opponent, (4)(b) Affirmation or Oath Requirement for witness, Ancient Documents Authentication, (8) Applicability of Rules of Evidence Generally, Attorney-Client Privilege, Authentication and Identification Generally, ch. 909 Acknowledgment, certificate of, (8) Ancient documents, (8) Commercial paper and related documents, (9) Comparison with authenticated specimens, (3) Distinctive characteristics, (4) Examples, Foreign public documents, (3) General provisions, , Governmental publications, (5) Handwriting, (2) Method provided by statute or rule, (10) Newspapers, (6) Official publications, (5) Patient health care records, (11) Periodicals, (6) Process or system, accuracy of data, (9) Public documents under seal, (1) without seal, (2) Public records, , , Self-authentication, Statutory authentication, (10), (10) Subscribing witness s testimony, Telephone conversations, (6) Trade inscriptions, (7) Voice identification, (5) October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-1

2 Availability Declarant s availability immaterial, hearsay exception, Declarant unavailable, hearsay exception, B Baptismal Certificate Hearsay exception, (12) Best Evidence Rule Application, Business Records Hearsay exceptions, Self-authentication, (12), (13) Summaries, C Calculations Admissibility, Certificate of Acknowledgment Authentication of documents, (8) Certificates Marriage, baptismal, and similar, hearsay exception, (12) Character Evidence Generally, Accused, character of, (1)(a) HIV test results, Habit or routine practice, Impeachment of witnesses (See Impeachment of Witnesses) Methods of proving, , Other crimes, wrongs, or acts, (2) Specific instances of conduct, (2), (2) Victim, character of, (1)(b) Witness, character of, (1)(c), Charts Admissibility, Children Audiovisual recordings of statements, admissibility, Juvenile adjudications, admissibility, Chiropractor-Patient Clergy Communications to, privileged, Co-conspirators Statement by, admissibility, (4)(b) Collateral Matters Evidence of contents of writing, recording, or photograph, (4) Collateral Sources Evidence of payments or benefits, (6m)(bm) Common-Law Privileges Not recognized, Competency of Witnesses General rule, Judge as witness, Juror as witness, Oath or affirmation, Personal knowledge required, Index-2 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

3 Compromise Admissibility, Compulsion Privileged matter disclosed under, Conduct Character evidence as admissible to prove, Specific instances as method of proving character, (2), (2) Specific instances as method of proving habit or routine practice, Confessions Preliminary question of admissibility, Confrontation Clause, ch. 27 Confusion Relevant evidence excluded on grounds of, Construction of Rules Wisconsin rules of evidence, Conviction of Crime Evidence of, admissibility, (2), Hearsay exception, (22) Court Commissioners Applicability of rules of evidence, (1) Crawford Cases, ch. 27 Credibility See also Impeachment of Witnesses Character opinion and reputation evidence, (1) specific instances of conduct, (2) Conviction of crime or adjudication of delinquency, Cross-examination on, (2) Hearsay declarant, Religious beliefs and opinions, Who may attack, Crime Attorney-client privilege, furtherance as exception, (4) Impeachment by evidence of conviction, Other crimes evidence, (2) Cross-examination Court-appointed experts, Disclosure of facts or data underlying expert s opinion, Scope, (2) Specific instances of conduct, (2) Cumulative Evidence Relevant evidence, exclusion as, D Data Compilations Authentication, (7), (8) Public records, contents of, Death Hearsay declarant, unavailability of, (1) Impending, hearsay exception for statement under belief of, (3) October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-3

4 Declarant Attacking and supporting credibility of, Defined, (2) Hearsay exceptions declarant s availability immaterial, declarant unavailable, Depositions Former testimony, hearsay exception, (1) Use at trial, ch. 28 Writing to refresh recollections before or while testifying, Disclosure See Compulsion; In Camera Disclosure; Privileges Doctor-Patient Documents Ancient, (8) Authentication, illustrations, Public, contents of, Public, self-authentication, Self-authentication, Domestic Partner Privilege, Domestic Violence Victim advocate, privileged communications, Duplicates Admissibility, Defined, (4) Dying Declarations Hearsay exception, (3) E Emotional Condition Hearsay exception, (3) Erroneous Ruling Harmless error, determination, Plain error, Excited Utterances Hearsay exception, (2) Statement of injured person as, Exclusion of Evidence Character evidence, Compromise, Crime victim information, Farmer assistance programs, communications in, Irrelevant evidence, Liability insurance, Mediation, Objections, Offer of proof, Offer or plea of guilty or no contest, Offers to compromise, Payment of medical and hospital expenses, Prejudice, confusion, or waste of time, Protective headgear use or nonuse, Statement of injured person, Subsequent remedial measures, Withdrawn plea of guilty, Exclusion of Witnesses Generally, Exculpatory Statements Hearsay exception, (4) Index-4 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

5 Expert Testimony Generally, Bases of opinion testimony by expert, , Court-appointed experts, Criminal cases, (5) Facts or data underlying expert opinion, , Lay testimony, distinctions, Reading expert s report into evidence, Ultimate issue, opinion on, F Family History, hearsay exception, (19), (23) Records, hearsay exception, (13) Farmer Assistance Programs Communication inadmissible, Foreign Records and Documents Self-authentication, Translations, Forfeiture See Waiver Former Testimony Hearsay exception, (1) Fraud Attorney-client privilege, furtherance as exception, (4) G Grand Juries Applicability of rules of evidence, (4) Greater Latitude Rule, (2) Guilty Plea Withdrawn plea, admissibility, H HIV Admissibility of test results, Habit Admissibility, Handwriting Nonexpert opinion as to genuineness, (2) Harmless Error Determination, Health Care Provider See also Privileges Statement of apology or condolence, inadmissibility, Health Care Provider Records See Patient Health Care Records Health Care Regulatory Agency Reports Inadmissibility, Hearsay Generally, ch. 908 Admissions, (4)(b) Availability of declarant immaterial, hearsay exceptions, October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-5

6 Co-conspirator, (4)(b) Declarant, (2) Declarant s credibility, Defined, (3) Exceptions, , , , see also (4) ancient documents, statements in, (16) comparable guarantees of trustworthiness, materials with, (24), (6) excited utterance, (2) family records, (13) former testimony, (1) hospital records, (6m) impending death, statement under belief of, (3) judgment as to history or boundaries, (23) judgment of conviction, (22) market reports and commercial documents, (17) marriage, baptismal, and other certificates, (12) medical diagnosis or treatment, statements relating to, (4) mental, emotional, or physical condition, then existing, (3) personal or family history statement, (5), (5m) present sense impression, (1) public records and reports, (8), (10) recorded recollection, (5) records, absence of entry in, (7), (10) records of documents affecting property interest, (15) records of regularly conducted activity, (6), (7) records of religious organizations, (11) records of vital statistics, (9) reputation as to character, (21) reputation concerning boundaries or general history, (20) reputation concerning personal or family history, (19) statement against interest, (4) statement in document affecting property interest, (15) treatises, (18) Nonverbal conduct, (1) Prior statements by witnesses, (4) Rule, Statement defined, (1) excluded categories, (4) Unavailability of declarant death or infirmity, (1)(d) definition, Within hearsay, Helmet Evidence of use or nonuse, Honesty Testing Devices Privilege, Husband and Wife and Domestic Partner Privilege, Identification Authentication and, ch. 909 Other crimes evidence as proof of, (2) Statement of, (4) I Index-6 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

7 Impeachment of Witnesses By whom, Character evidence, Conviction of crime or adjudication of delinquency, evidence of, Hearsay declarant, Nolo contendere pleas, Opinion evidence, Pendency of appeal of conviction or delinquency adjudication, (5) Prior inconsistent statements, (2) Religious belief, evidence of, Reputation, (1) Specific instances of conduct, (2) In Camera Disclosure Communications in mediation, (4) Informer privilege, (3) Writings, used to refresh memory, Inconsistent Statements Prior, (2), (4)(a) Inferences Experts, basis of, Facts underlying, Lay witness, Ultimate issue, Infirmity Hearsay declarant, unavailability of, (1) Informer Privilege, Injured Person Evidence of protective headgear or nonuse, Statement by, admissibility, Insurance Evidence regarding, admissibility, Intent Other crimes evidence as proof, (2) Interpreters Privilege, Witness rules, Interrogation By judge, Mode and order, Irrelevant Evidence Admissibility, John Doe Proceedings Applicability of rules of evidence, (4) J Judges Calling and interrogation of witnesses by, Control of interrogation of witnesses, Definition, (1) Determination of admissibility, Incompetency as witness, October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-7

8 Judgment Hearsay exception as to personal, family, or general history, or boundaries, (23) of previous conviction, (22) Judicial Notice Adjudicative facts, Administrative rules, Foreign laws, Ordinances, Juror Competency as witness, Jury Hearings outside presence of, , Inadmissible evidence, Validity of verdict or indictment, (2) Jury Instructions Judicial notice, Presumptions in criminal cases, L Law Enforcement Informer privilege, Privilege for investigatory files, Lawyer-Client Privilege, Lay Opinion Testimony by lay witness, Lead Dust testing results, admissibility, Leading Questions When used, (3) Learned Treatises Hearsay exception, (18) Liability Insurance Admissibility, Limited Admissibility Application of rule, M Marriage Certificate, hearsay exception, (12) Husband-wife privilege, Religious record of, hearsay exception, (11) Marriage and Family Therapist Patient Mediation See also Negotiations Privilege, Medical and Similar Expenses, Payment of Admissibility, Medical Diagnosis or Treatment Hearsay exception for statements relating to, (4) Memory Writings, used to refresh, Index-8 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

9 Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition Hearsay exception, (3) Statement of injured person, Mental Incapacity Competency of witness, Hearsay declarant, unavailability of, Minors See Children Motion to Strike Admission of evidence, Motive Other crimes evidence as proof of, (2) Prior statement by witness to rebut, (4) State of mind, hearsay exception, (3) Municipal Courts Applicability of rules of evidence, (1) N Negotiations Conduct occurring during, Newspapers Self-authentication, (6) Nolo Contendere (No Contest) Pleas Admissibility, Nurse-Patient O Oath or Affirmation Requirement for witness, Objection Admission of evidence, Exclusion of evidence, Offer of Proof Requirement, Offer to Plead Guilty or No Contest Admissibility, Official Publications Self-authentication, (5) Opinion on Ultimate Issue Admissibility, Opinion Testimony Expert witnesses, , , Handwriting, nonexpert opinion, (2) Lay witnesses, Method of proving character, (1), (1) Method of proving habit or routine practice, Opportunity Other crimes evidence as proof of, (2) Ordinances Judicial notice, Original Defined, (3) Duplicates, admissibility, October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-9

10 Required to prove contents of writing, recording, or photograph, Unavailable, admissibility of other evidence of contents, Other Crimes Evidence Admissibility, (2) Pamphlet Hearsay exception, (18) Patient Health Care Records Authentication, (11) Hearsay exception, (6m) Payment of Medical Expenses As evidence of liability, Periodicals Hearsay exception, (18) Self-authentication, (6) Personal History Statements of, hearsay exception, (5), (5m) Personal Injury Evidence of protective headgear use or nonuse, Statement of injured person, Personal Knowledge Lay witness opinion testimony, requirement, Recorded recollection, requirement, (5) Witness s testimony, requirement for, P Photographs Contents proved through adverse party s admission, Defined, (2) Duplicates, admissibility, Original evidence determination, function of trier of fact, Original required to prove contents, Summaries, Physical Condition Hearsay exceptions, (3), (4), (6m) Impending death, hearsay exception, (3) Statement of injured person, Physician-Patient Plain Error Determination, Plan Other crimes evidence as proof of, (2) Pleas and Plea Discussions Exclusion, Podiatrist-Patient Political Vote Privilege, Polygraphs Privilege, Prejudicial Relevant evidence, excluded as, , , Index-10 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

11 Preliminary Hearings Jury presence, (3) Testimony of accused, (4) Preliminary Questions Generally, Applicability of the rules of evidence, (4) Conviction of crime or delinquency adjudication, (3) Preparation Other crimes evidence as proof of, (2) Present Sense Impression Hearsay exception, (1) Statement of injured person as, Presumptions Generally, Criminal cases, Prior Inconsistent Statements Generally, (2), (4)(a) Prior Statements by Witness Generally, , (4)(a) Privileged Matter Disclosure under compulsion, Forfeiture, attorney-client privilege, (5) Waiver, Privileges Applicability in proceedings, Attorney-client, Chiropractor-patient, Clergy, communications to, Comments by judge or counsel, Crime victim compensation proceedings, Disclosure of privileged matter compulsion, forfeiture, (5) waiver, Domestic partner, Domestic violence or sexual abuse victim advocate, Existence of privilege, preliminary questions, Farmer assistance programs, Federal tax returns, General rule, Honesty testing devices, Husband-wife, Identity of informers, Inference from claim, Interpreters, Jury instruction, Law enforcement records, Marriage and family therapist patient, Nurse-patient, Physician-patient, Podiatrist-patient, Political vote, Professional counselor patient, Psychologist-patient, Report required by law, Self-incrimination, , (3) Sexual abuse or domestic violence victim advocate, Social worker patient, Trade secrets, Veteran mentors, Waiver by voluntary disclosure, Probative Value vs. Prejudice Test Exclusion of evidence of conviction of a crime or adjudication of delinquency, Exclusion of HIV test results, Exclusion of relevant evidence, October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-11

12 Products Liability Subsequent remedial measures, Professional Counselor Patient Property Records Hearsay exception, (15) Protective Headgear Evidence of use or nonuse, Psychologist-Patient Public Documents Self-authentication, Public Records Authentication, (7), Certified copies, self-authentication, Contents, how proved, Hearsay exceptions, (8), (10) Purpose of Rules Generally, R Rape Shield Law Generally, (1)(b) See also , (1), (3)(cm), (1), (1) Recollection Recorded, hearsay exception, (5) Refreshing memory, Recordings Contents proved through adverse party s admission, Defined, (1) Duplicates, admissibility, Original evidence determination, function of trier of fact, Original required to prove contents, Related, admissibility, Summaries, Records Authentication business records, (12), (13) public records, (7), Hearsay exceptions, (6), (6m), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (13), (14) Refreshing Memory Writings, use of, Rehabilitation of Witnesses Character opinion and reputation evidence, (1) specific instances of conduct, (2) Religious beliefs or opinions, Relevant Evidence Admissibility rules, Conditioned on fact, (2) Definition, Exclusion, grounds of, Religious Beliefs Impeachment by evidence of, Religious Records Hearsay exception, (11) Marriage, baptismal, and similar certificates, hearsay exception, (12) Repair After Event Admissibility, Index-12 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

13 Reports Expert s, Health care regulatory agency, inadmissibility, Hearsay exception, (8), (17) Law enforcement, privileged, Prepared in course of regularly conducted business, hearsay exception, (6) Required by statute, privileged, Reputation Character, hearsay exception, (21) Complaining witness in certain actions, (3) Concerning boundaries or general history, hearsay exception, (20) Concerning personal and family history, hearsay exception, (19) Method of proving character, (1), (1) Restitution Hearings Applicability of rules of evidence, (5) Routine Practice Admissibility, Rulings on Evidence Generally, Scope Generally, S Seals Domestic public documents, authentication under seal, (1) without seal, (2) Self-Authentication Generally, Self-Incrimination Comment on privilege in civil case, (4) Credibility testimony not waiver of privilege, (3) Sentencing Inapplicability of rule of evidence, (4) Settlement Conduct occurring during negotiations, exclusion of, In mediation, Sexual Abuse or Assault See also Rape Shield Law Victim advocate, privileged communications, Victim s past behavior, relevance, (3)(c) Sexual Conduct Admissibility, generally, in civil action for damages, Preliminary question of admissibility, Small Claims Court Inapplicability of rules of evidence, (4) Social Worker Patient October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-13

14 State of Mind Hearsay exception, (3) Statement Defined, (1) Of apology or condolence, by health care provider, inadmissibility, Of injured person, admissibility, Statements Against Interest Admissions, Hearsay exception, (4) Subsequent Remedial Measures Admissibility, Summaries Admissibility, T Telephone Calls Authentication, (6) Testimony Cross-examination, Expert testimony, , Interpreters, Oath or affirmation, Opinion testimony by lay witnesses, Personal knowledge, Personal presence at trial, Trade Inscriptions Self-authentication, (7) Trade Secrets Privilege, Truthfulness Character evidence, U Ultimate Issue Opinion on, Unavailability Definition, Hearsay exceptions, Uniform Commercial Code Self-authentication of documents under, (9) Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act Generally, V Victims Character evidence, Crime victim compensation proceedings, privilege, Crime victim, information about, Domestic violence or sexual abuse, communications to victim advocate, Sexual assault victim s past behavior, relevance, Vital Statistics Hearsay exception, (9) Voice Identification Authentication, (5) Treatises Hearsay exception, (18) Index-14 October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

15 W Waiver Privilege forfeiture, attorney-client privilege, (5) waiver by voluntary disclosure, Waste of Time Relevant evidence excluded as, Witnesses Calling by judge, (1) Character of, (1)(c), Competency, Credibility, Cross-examination, Exclusion, Expert, ch. 907 Impeachment (See Impeachment of Witnesses) Interrogation by judge, (2) Interpreters, Judge as witness, Juror as witness, Lay witnesses, Mode of interrogation, Oath or affirmation, Personal knowledge requirement, Prior statements, Privileges (See Privileges) Qualification, determination by preliminary questions, Rehabilitation (See Rehabilitation of Witnesses) Religious beliefs, Sexual conduct, (3)(c) Work Product Attorney-client privilege, Used to refresh memory, Written Statement Copies, Related writings, Writings Contents proved through adverse party s admission, Definition, (1) Duplicates, admissibility, Foreign languages, submission, translation, Original evidence determination, function of trier of fact, Original required to prove contents, Related, admissibility, Summaries, Used to refresh memory, October 2017, State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE Index-15

16

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) In American trials complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to

More information

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... Dedication... v About the Author... xvii Acknowledgments... xix Foreword... xxi Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... xxvi Chapter 1 Trial Process and Procedure... 1 The Role of the Trial Judge

More information

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (ADOPTED 9/4/2012) INDEX ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope... 1 Rule 102 Purpose and Construction... 1 ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE... 1 Rule 201

More information

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE 2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"

More information

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope These Simplified Federal Rules of Evidence (Mock Trial Version) govern the trial proceedings of the

More information

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"

More information

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Federal Rules of Evidence Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope Rule 102. Purpose and Construction Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence Rule 104. Preliminary Questions Rule

More information

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Part of a Continuum MBE Essay PT Memorize law Critical reading Identify relevant facts Marshal facts Communication skills

More information

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) The Supplement to the 2012 Edition of the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) is a complete revision of the Military

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2017 The goal of this 2018 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy

More information

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) 2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that

More information

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) of 27 2/26/2012 10:34 AM Published on Federal Evidence Review (http://federalevidence.com) Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) The Federal Rules of Evidence Page provides the current version of the Federal

More information

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Article IV: Relevancy and its Limits Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would

More information

Thinking Evidentially

Thinking Evidentially Thinking Evidentially Writing & Arguing Powerful Motions October 17, 2013 2013 www.rossdalecle.com Presentation of Proof Plaintiff (or prosecutor) presents case-in-chief, then rests; When witnesses are

More information

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive TRIAL OBJECTIONS Albert E. Durkin, Esq. Miroballi Durkin & Rudin LLC Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive Will the answer hurt your case? Protecting the record

More information

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Last Updated: January 6, 2014 American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I. Rule 101. Scope; Definitions (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in the courts of the State of

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: Section 1. A new Chapter is

More information

MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE

MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE Last reviewed and edited December 15, 2011 Including amendments effective January 1, 2012 MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE TABLE OF RULES ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS RULE: 101. SCOPE. 102. PURPOSE AND CONSTRUCTION.

More information

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, 2016 ARTICLE I. Rule 101. Rule 102. Rule 103. Rule 104. Rule 105. Rule 106. Rule 107. ARTICLE II. Rule 201. Rule 202. Rule 203. Rule 204. ARTICLE III. Rule 301.

More information

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2018 The goal of this 2019 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy

More information

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. This seminar focuses on the fundamentals of evidence in Florida including documentary evidence, demonstrative evidence, expert testimony, trial objectives and

More information

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Admissibility of Electronic Evidence PAUL W. GRIMM AND KEVIN F. BRADY 2018 Potential Authentication Methods Email, Text Messages, and Instant Messages Trade inscriptions (902(7)) Certified copies of business

More information

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE by Curtis E. Shirley RELEVANCE Indiana Evidence Rule 401: Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the

More information

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE Recognized Objections I. Authority RULE OBJECTION PAGE 001/002 Outside the Scope of the Ordinance 3 II. Rules of Form RULE OBJECTION PAGE RULE OBJECTION PAGE 003 Leading 3 004

More information

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows: Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows: Article 1. General Provisions. Rule 101. Scope. These rules govern proceedings in the courts of

More information

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline Law applying to both FRE & CEC is in black Law applying to FRE only is in blue Law applying to CEC only is in red WHEN TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW - only on

More information

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq. LIST OF CHAPTERS Chapter 1 PRETRIAL.............................................. 1 Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Chapter 2 MOTIONS IN LIMINE................................... 17 Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Chapter

More information

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013 ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS (F) a hearing on justification for pretrial detention not involving bail; RULE 101. TITLE AND SCOPE Title. These rules shall

More information

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM.  EVIDENCE FULL OUTLINE www.barexamdoctor.com EVIDENCE I. RELEVANCE a. Definition i. Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the

More information

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence Vicki Voisin, ACP And Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. 2011 Vicki Voisin, Inc. and Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. All rights reserved. No part of this handout may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic

More information

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 These exceptions are allowed because the rules feel that they have inherent indicia of reliability. Therefore, they can be allowed even though they re hearsay. The

More information

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1 Article 6. Witnesses. Rule 601. General rule of competency; disqualification of witness. (a) General rule. Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules. (b) Disqualification

More information

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page ii elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page iii Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

More information

PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1

PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1 Preface xxv Acknowledgments xxix Art Credits xxxi About the Author xxxiii PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO EVIDENCE AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE 2 Chapter Topics 2 Objectives

More information

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: This handout contains a detailed answer explanation for each Evidence question that appeared

More information

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005 THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005 The ability to call the state laws to witness must be given prime importance, without being influenced solely by what is said by the incumbents. Zhabdrung Rimpochhe THE

More information

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1 DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE Title 6 Page 1 TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 GENERAL 6-1-1 Scope, Purpose and Construction 6-1-2

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF 1 1 Innocence Legal Team 00 S. Main Street, Suite Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: -000 Attorney for Defendant SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) Case No. CALIFORNIA, ) ) POINTS

More information

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES Speakers: Honorable Krystal Q. Alves, Circuit Court Honorable

More information

The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: So it makes some sense to go straight to Rule 1101, even though it is

The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: So it makes some sense to go straight to Rule 1101, even though it is ALABAMA RULES OF EVIDENCE BACK TO THE BASICS The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: Rule 101. Scope. These rules govern proceedings in the courts of the State of Alabama to the

More information

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE 3 credit hours Prepared by: Mark A. Byington Revised by: Mark A. Byington Revised Date: August 2014 Dr. Sandy Frey, Chair, Social Science

More information

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE EVIDENCE OUTLINE Why have federal rules of evidence? We want to 1) Reign in the parties in an adversary system; 2) We don t fully trust juries; 3) Time is short; 4) We want people to consult attorneys

More information

GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L (JUNE 12, 2015)

GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L (JUNE 12, 2015) GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L. 33-051 (JUNE 12, 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE 6 EVIDENCE DIVISION 1 GUAM RULES OF EVIDENCE DIVISION 2 PRINCIPLES OF EVIDENCE Chapter 1. General

More information

y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015

y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015 y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015 Instructor: Steven J. Katz POPP@ARTC - WLAC Course Section No.7572 Mon-Wed. 7:35 9:00 a.m. ARTC E-mail: katzsj@wlac.edu Message Telephone:(310)

More information

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct John Rubin UNC School of Government April 2010 What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct Issues Theories Character directly in issue Character as circumstantial

More information

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses N.J.R.E 601. General Rule of Competency Every person is competent to be a witness unless (a) the judge finds that the proposed witness is incapable of

More information

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS EVIDENCE: COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS Topic 1: Introduction to the Law of Evidence Read: Text pages 1 9 Rules 101, 102, 1101 A. Addressing Societal Conflicts/Disputes 1. Name various ways we address

More information

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE Twelfth edition COLIN TAPPER, MA, BCL Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS Preface to the 12th edition v Extractfrom the preface

More information

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1 Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1 Class Schedule Fall 2015 Class# Day Date 1 Mon 17-Aug 2 Wed 19-Aug 3 Mon 24-Aug 4 Wed 26-Aug 5 Mon 31-Aug 6 Wed 2-Sep HOLIDAY Mon 7-Sep 7 Wed

More information

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Jay E. Grenig Rocco M. Scanza Cornell University, ILR School Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution JURIS Questions

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dustin has been charged with participating

More information

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION SWEET & MAXWELL ;: THOMSON REUTERS PAGE Foreword Preface Table of Cases Table of Statutes Table of Civil Procedure Rules Table of Legislation

More information

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006 Katz EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006 I. RELEVANCE Threshold Question: What is the purpose for this offer of evidence? -Where we start, almost all other areas of evidence law rely on relevance LOGICAL RELEVANCE:

More information

Antitrust Evidence Handbook. Third Edition

Antitrust Evidence Handbook. Third Edition Antitrust Evidence Handbook Third Edition CONTENTS Foreword... xi Preface... xiii Chapter I Hearsay Issues Most Relevant in Antitrust Cases... 1 A. Procedural Matters... 6 1. Evidentiary Burden... 6 2.

More information

6. Secondary evidence rule. 7. CEC 352 discretion to exclude for unfair prejudice. a 2/3 vote by legislature after 1982.

6. Secondary evidence rule. 7. CEC 352 discretion to exclude for unfair prejudice. a 2/3 vote by legislature after 1982. EVIDENCE OUTLINE 1. Key CA Distinction ( Truth in Evidence Amendment) a. Proposition 8 makes all relevant evidence admissible in a criminal case. i. Exceptions: 1. Exclusionary rules under the US Constitution

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul sued David in federal court

More information

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES K.I.S.S. TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES Paul S. Milich Georgia State University College of Law Atlanta, Georgia 1 of 9 Institute of Continuing Legal Education K.I.S.S Keep It Short & Simple November 14, 2014

More information

FORENSIC EXERCISE. JTIP Handout: Lesson 28 Hearsay. b. Is consistent with the declarant s WHAT IS HEARSAY?

FORENSIC EXERCISE. JTIP Handout: Lesson 28 Hearsay. b. Is consistent with the declarant s WHAT IS HEARSAY? FORENSIC EXERCISE WHAT IS HEARSAY? FRE Rule Notes/Examples 801(a) (c): Definition of Hearsay (a) A statement is an oral or written assertion or nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person

More information

Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN

Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN Evid. R. 401 Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination

More information

EVIDENCE CHAPTER 65 EVIDENCE

EVIDENCE CHAPTER 65 EVIDENCE [CH.65 1 LIST OF AUTHORISED PAGES 1-2 LRO 1/2008 3-8 Original 9-10 LRO 1/2008 11-22 Original 23-24 LRO 1/2008 25-77 Original CHAPTER 65 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title.

More information

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY

More information

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question. MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Criminal trials are conducted using strict rules of evidence to promote fairness. To participate in a Mock Trial, you need to know its rules of evidence. The California

More information

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice Impeachment by omission Impeachment for inconsistent statement The Evidence Dance Opening Statement Tip Twice Closing Argument The Love Boat Story: A Vicious Tale Top Six Objections Evidence Review Housekeeping

More information

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Revised August 2015 Rules Unique to Middle School Mock Trial I. Invention of Facts and Extrapolation The object of these rules is to prevent a team

More information

ER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson

ER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson Top of Form Volume: 39-1 Date: Sep 1 2003 TRIAL NEWS WASHINGTON STATE TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION ER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson ER 904 was supposed

More information

Evidence. I) Relevance

Evidence. I) Relevance Evidence I) Relevance A) Rule 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence": "Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination

More information

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq. EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS Laurie Vahey, Esq. KINDS OF EVIDENCE Testimonial Including depositions Make sure you comply with CPLR requirements Experts Real Documentary Demonstrative Visual aid

More information

Evidence. An Overview of Relevance and Hearsay: A Nine Step Analytical Guide

Evidence. An Overview of Relevance and Hearsay: A Nine Step Analytical Guide Evidence In this subject, CALI has Lessons, Podcasts and elangdell Press Texts. There are also Casebook Correlations available on the CALI website to aid you in assigning lessons. CALI Lessons: An Overview

More information

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY TEXAS DISCOVERY Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW 2. 1999 REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY 3. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLANS 4. FORMS OF DISCOVERY A. Discovery Provided for by the Texas

More information

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary acquit: affidavit: alibi: amendment: appeal: arrest: arraignment: bail: To set free or discharge from accusation; to declare that the defendant is innocent

More information

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) Rev. January 2015 This chart was prepared by Children s Law Center as a practice aid for attorneys representing children, parents, family

More information

Mock Trial Practice Law Test

Mock Trial Practice Law Test Mock Trial Practice Law Test NOTE: The practice law test is provided as an example and will not be updated each year. Below are sample questions that are similar to those that students may see on the real

More information

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial C H A P T E R 1 0 Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial O U T L I N E Introduction Pretrial Activities The Criminal Trial Stages of a Criminal Trial Improving the Adjudication Process L E A R N I

More information

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and:

More information

1980, No. 27 Evidence Amendment (No. 2) 173

1980, No. 27 Evidence Amendment (No. 2) 173 1980, No. 27 Evidence Amendment (No. 2) 173 Title 1. Short Title, commencement, and application PART I ADMISSIBILITY OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE 2. Interpretation Documentary Hearsay Evidence 3. Admissibility

More information

I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee

I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee comments? 3. Why is this the best objection? Is there

More information

ARTICLE VI. WITNESSES

ARTICLE VI. WITNESSES WITNESSES 225 Rule 601 ARTICLE VI. WITNESSES Rule 601. Competency. 602. Need for Personal Knowledge. 603. Oath or Affirmation to Testify Truthfully. 604. Interpreter. 605. Judge s Competency as a Witness.

More information

OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE

OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope of rules: applicability; privileges; exceptions 102 Purpose and construction; supplementary principles 103 Rulings on evidence 104 Preliminary

More information

TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE

TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE SECTION 1: JUDGE S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Thoroughly know all of the Simplified Rules of Evidence and Trial Procedure Rules and make sure they are strictly enforced

More information

ADVOCATES ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM PRESENTED BY: REBECCA MILLER

ADVOCATES ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM PRESENTED BY: REBECCA MILLER ADVOCATES ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM PRESENTED BY: REBECCA MILLER Advocates Role in the Criminal Justice System OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this module participant will be able to: Understand

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dave brought his sports car into

More information

Minnesota Rules of Evidence [Relevant Extracts Full Rules here] ARTICLE 7. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY. Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witness

Minnesota Rules of Evidence [Relevant Extracts Full Rules here] ARTICLE 7. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY. Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witness Minnesota Rules of Evidence [Relevant Extracts Full Rules here] ARTICLE 7. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witness If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness

More information

EVIDENCE. Professor Franks. Final Examination, Fall 2013 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

EVIDENCE. Professor Franks. Final Examination, Fall 2013 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS EVIDENCE Professor Franks Final Examination, Fall 2013 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Carefully analyze the facts and grasp the issues in each question before beginning to write. Spend time reading the question

More information

matter as follows. NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2015

matter as follows. NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2015 IN NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 1 Appellee v. CRAIG GARDNER, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant No. 3662 EDA 2015 Appeal from the

More information

PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE Jeffrey K. Anderson, Esq. Anderson, Moschetti & Taffany, PLLC 26 Century Hill Drive, Suite 206 Latham, New York 12110 anderson@amtinjurylaw.com

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : : GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY EXPLANATION OF DEFENDANT S RIGHTS You or your attorney

More information

Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination Penny J. White

Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination Penny J. White Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination Penny J. White I. Introduction: Duty to Exercise Control Rule 611 II. Specific Limitations on Witness Examinations A. Direct Examination Scope and

More information

Chapter 48. Evidence Act Certified on: / /20.

Chapter 48. Evidence Act Certified on: / /20. Chapter 48. Evidence Act 1975. Certified on: / /20. INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Chapter 48. Evidence Act 1975. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Interpretation. bank business

More information

FEDERAL RULES EVIDENCE

FEDERAL RULES EVIDENCE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE DECEMBER 1, 2014 E PLURIBUS UNUM Printed for the use of THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 113TH CONGRESS " COMMITTEE PRINT! No. 10 2nd Session FEDERAL RULES

More information

WHEN IS IT PROPER TO OBJECT IN A DEPOSITION OR TO INSTRUCT A WITNESS NOT TO ANSWER? by Mark A. Lienhoop September 4, 1996

WHEN IS IT PROPER TO OBJECT IN A DEPOSITION OR TO INSTRUCT A WITNESS NOT TO ANSWER? by Mark A. Lienhoop September 4, 1996 WHEN IS IT PROPER TO OBJECT IN A DEPOSITION OR TO INSTRUCT A WITNESS NOT TO ANSWER? by Mark A. Lienhoop September 4, 1996 Some lawyers spend a lot of time in depositions. Despite this it seems many do

More information

As used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following

As used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following Page 1 Massachusetts General Laws Annotated Currentness Part IV. Crimes, Punishments and Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 263-280) Title II. Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 275-280) Chapter 278A.

More information

CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING

CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING ADJUDICATORY HEARING 237 Rule 401 CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING Rule 401. Introduction to Chapter Four. 404. Prompt Adjudicatory Hearing. 406. Adjudicatory Hearing. 407. Admissions. 408. Ruling on Offenses.

More information

USA v. Brian Campbell

USA v. Brian Campbell 2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-7-2012 USA v. Brian Campbell Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-4335 Follow this and

More information

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Spring 2014) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 01/02/2014) Page 1

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Spring 2014) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 01/02/2014) Page 1 Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 01/02/2014) Page 1 Class Schedule Spring 2014 Class# Day Date 1 Mon 13-Jan 2 Wed 15-Jan HOLIDAY Mon 20-Jan 3 Wed 22-Jan 4 Mon 27-Jan 5 Wed 29-Jan 6 Mon 3-Feb 7 Wed

More information

How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana

How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana How to Testify Qualifications for Testimony Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. CPE PIN Instructions 2018 Association of Certified

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 18, 2004 v No. 244553 Shiawassee Circuit Court RICKY ALLEN PARKS, LC No. 02-007574-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A 2010 Second Semester Assignment 1 Question 1 If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first of all search

More information

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,

More information