MINUTES BROWARD METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Thursday, March 10, 2016, 9:30 a.m. 100 West Cypress Creek Road Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309

Transcription

1 MINUTES BROWARD METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Thursday, March 10, 2016, 9:30 a.m. 100 West Cypress Creek Road Fort Lauderdale, Florida Chair: Hollywood Commissioner Richard Blattner Vice Chair: Fort Lauderdale Commissioner Bruce Roberts Davie Councilmember Bryan Caletka District 1: Coral Springs Commissioner Larry Vignola Alternates: Margate Commissioner Joanne Simone North Lauderdale Commissioner Jerry Graziose Parkland Commissioner Christine Hunschofsky District 2: Deerfield Beach Commissioner Gloria Battle Alternates: Lighthouse Point Commissioner Sandy Johnson Lauderdale-By-The-Sea Commissioner Mark Brown District 3: [Vice Chair Roberts] Fort Lauderdale Commissioner Romney Rogers Plantation Councilman Ron Jacobs Sunrise Commissioner Lawrence Sofield Alternates: Lauderdale Lakes Vice Mayor Beverly Williams Oakland Park Vice Mayor John Adornato Wilton Manors Commissioner Tom Green District 4: [Chair Blattner] Alternates: Hallandale Beach Mayor Joy Cooper District 5: [Vice Chair Caletka] Miramar Commissioner Yvette Colbourne Pembroke Pines Mayor Frank Ortis Weston Commissioner Toby Feuer Alternates: Cooper City Commissioner Lisa Mallozzi Southwest Ranches Councilmember Freddy Fisikelli Agenda Item R-2 Broward County School Board Member Patricia Good Broward County Board of County Commissioners Commissioner Mark Bogen Broward County Board of County Commissioners Commissioner Dale Holness South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Commissioner Tim Ryan Other Present Greg Stuart, Broward MPO Executive Director Michael Ronskavitz, Broward MPO Deputy Director Alan Gabriel, Broward MPO General Counsel Charlene Burke, Paul Calvaresi, James Cromar, Carl Ema, Roxana Ene, Paul Flavien, Peter Gies, Daniel Knickelbein, Tracy Mitchell-Flavien, Chris Ryan, Buffy Sanders II, Kathy Singer, Francis Tettey, Anthea Thomas and Lydia Waring, MPO Staff Todd Brauer, Whitehouse Group Carol Cascio, Broward County Public Schools Robert Kirckovich, Broward County Public Schools Doug Smith, City Manager, City of Margate

2 Page 2 Enid Valdez, Director of Career, Technical, Adult, and Community Education, Broward County Public Schools Jamie Opperlee, Recording Secretary, Prototype, Inc. (A copy of the sign-in sheet identifying those present is filed with the supplemental papers to the minutes of this meeting.) A meeting of the Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization was held at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, March 10, 2016, in Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization s Board Room at 100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. R-1 Call to Order and Pledge REGULAR ITEMS (All Items Open for Public Comment) Chair Blattner called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. R-2 Approval of Minutes February 11, 2016 Commissioner Bogen stated that the County Attorney has taken the position that expansion of the MPO Board is a violation of the interlocal agreement (ILA), as all parties to the ILA must agree to amend it. In the County Attorney s view, this means the ILA has not been amended. He recommended having an independent attorney offer an opinion on this issue; until this is done, he would raise a standing objection to any and all votes taken by the new members. Broward MPO General Counsel Alan Gabriel advised that the MPO is confident in its decision to modify its membership from 19 to 25 voting members, as this decision was based on State Statute Section , the enabling Statute for the MPO. Because the amendment was two years in the making, he pointed out that the County Attorney had the opportunity to raise any objections before action was taken. Attorney Gabriel read from the appropriate State Statute, asserting that the Broward MPO has taken all the necessary steps under its statutory requirements. The Board discussed the issue, with Mayor Cooper expressing frustration that the County has taken a position that does not embrace the recent change and Commissioner Bogen characterizing this position as an issue of law. Chair Blattner stated that once the Board members have discussed the issue further, Commissioner Bogen would have the opportunity to make a motion on his recommendation of independent review. Attorney Gabriel explained that the expansion did not add new members, but amended the voting privileges of alternate members. It was noted that representatives of the County

3 Page 3 Commission were present during the discussions of amending the ILA, and there has been no written correspondence to the MPO from the County on this issue. Attorney Gabriel continued that the MPO was advised by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) with regard to the appropriate procedure for amending the ILA. MPO Executive Director Greg Stuart added that MPOs in Orlando and Palm Beach have taken similar actions to expand their voting memberships. Chair Blattner stated that the MPO sent documents to all its member cities and organizations. Commissioner Rogers suggested that the members should be provided with copies of the ILA identifying the provisions to which the County Attorney has taken exception. He felt it would be irresponsible for the Board to vote on this issue without seeing the document. Vice Chair Caletka observed that the FDOT District 4 Secretary signed the amended ILA, which has been recorded in the public records of Broward County. Chair Blattner reiterated that the amended ILA was sent to every member municipality and organization, and the County did not respond to it. Attorney Gabriel stated once again that he has not received any written communication or request for information on this issue from the County Attorney. Motion made by Mayor Cooper, seconded by Vice Chair Caletka, to reconfirm the Board s decision that they agree with the MPO attorney and that they support the 25-member MPO. Commissioner Bogen advised that neither he nor the County Attorney speak on behalf of the entire Broward County Board of County Commissioners, as its various members may feel differently on this issue. Mr. Stuart observed that County Commissioners took part in the final vote on this issue, which was taken at the February 11, 2016 meeting; the authorization of the ILA amendment took place after an earlier vote, which was held in The County Commissioners voted affirmatively at the February 11 meeting. Commissioner Holness advised that he agreed with Commissioner Bogen, and felt the Board should delay any vote on this issue until the next meeting without greater clarification of both sides points of view. Commissioner Mallozzi called the question, seconded by Mayor Cooper. In a show of hands, the Board voted to call the question. In a show of hands, the motion passed Motion made by Commissioner Bogen, seconded by Commissioner Holness, to request a third-party opinion from an attorney to determine that the action of the Board is legally correct.

4 Page 4 Chair Blattner requested clarification of which entity would pay for the proposed third-party opinion. Mr. Stuart replied that this would be left up the Board to determine. In a show of hands, the motion failed Commissioner Bogen stated that he would raise a standing objection to all future votes taken by the 25-member Board until the matter is clarified. [Commissioner Sofield arrived at 10:15 but abstained from voting on either motion made with regard to the ILA amendment.] Motion made by Mayor Ortis, seconded by Mayor Cooper, to approve the February 11, 2016 minutes. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. R-3 Approval of Agenda Chair Blattner advised that Item NA-1 would be heard out of order on the Agenda, immediately following Item R-9. Motion made by Commissioner Mallozzi, seconded by School Board Member Good, to approve the Agenda [as amended]. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. R-4 Public Comments None. R-5 Comments from the Chair Chair Blattner advised that the absences of Commissioner Debra Placko and Commissioner Barbara Sharief were excused. Motion made by School Board Member Good, seconded by Commissioner Mallozzi, to approve. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. Chair Blattner added that in the future, the City of Dania Beach will be represented by Mayor Marco Salvino. R-6 Status Report Strategic Business Plan (Economic Development) Meeting of February 11, 2016 Mayor Cooper reported that the Economic Development Advisory Committee will focus on implementation of the 2040 South Florida Regional Freight Plan, and will work to develop a framework with which to move forward. They will also develop a list of memberships for the MPO Freight Committee which will include not only MPO Board members but other stakeholders, including industry experts, airports, and ports.

5 Page 5 R-7 Executive Director s and Legislative Reports Mr. Stuart stated that the MPO s advocacy team, Holland & Knight, have provided information on two grant opportunities: Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) and Fast Lane grants. The MPO is working on a joint Fast Lane grant application with Port Everglades. Holland & Knight have also provided access to United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) staff, who are working with city staff on the projects most likely to move forward in the TIGER grant process. At the State level, several bills have recently died, including bills for traffic infraction detectors, transportation reinvestment zones, participation of electric vehicles in mileagebased user fees, and an express lane authority bill. Bills that continue to move forward include traffic safety bills requiring railings for all roads adjacent to bodies of water, a $25 million annual funding program for Florida seaports, and a bill allowing for the increase of enclave annexation from 10 acres to 150 acres. Mr. Stuart continued that SB 1392, which is currently on the Senate floor, would place traffic control devices in school zones and remove any such devices that do not conform with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This bill would also regulate autonomous vehicles by including them in the next draft of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), expand on enforcement of State, county, and municipal parking laws, revise the definition of port vehicles and equipment, and require local governments to consider information provided by FDOT that affects denial of land use changes. Mr. Stuart noted that USDOT has recently issued guidance to all states to repurpose $200 billion in unused earmarks, of which Broward County and its affiliated governments have $10.2 million. Funds must be spent within 50 miles of the earmark. The MPO will meet with FDOT District 4 Secretary Gerry O Reilly to discuss this further. A Let s Go Biking event was held the previous weekend in Pembroke Pines, with over 100 attendees. Other recent events include a workshop on the proposed one-cent surtax, held in Miramar on March 2, 2016; a ribbon-cutting for the Flagler Greenway in Fort Lauderdale; a presentation to the Hallandale Beach Chamber of Commerce on February 25; and a transportation workshop with the County on February 16. R-8 General Counsel s Report Attorney Gabriel stated that the MPO s lease with the Trade Center South building expires in June The MPO currently occupies its eighth floor. They are considering relocation to the sixth floor, which will provide additional square footage. He anticipated being able to bring a lease document before the Board for approval in the next few months. R-9 Member Comments Commissioner Rogers observed that there have been discussions in Fort Lauderdale regarding the impact of increased freight traffic on overall traffic. He recommended that

6 Page 6 any grant funds related to freight be used to facilitate a better way to do business while moving freight. Mr. Stuart replied that Holland & Knight advocates in favor of inserting more funds into the Federal Railway Administration for railroad crossings. Chair Blattner commented that many cities along the CSX corridor have not passed quiet zone legislation. He requested that Mr. Stuart work with these municipalities to encourage them to pass appropriate legislation on this issue. Mr. Stuart replied that he would bring back an item on next month s Agenda which deals with quiet zones. Commissioner Graziose thanked Broward County Traffic Engineering for their work on Cypress Creek Road, which includes re-striping, new signage, and flashing lights on approaches to bridges and curves. Commissioner Simone pulled Item C-1 from the Consent Agenda for additional discussion. The following Item was taken out of order on the Agenda. NON-ACTION ITEMS NA-1 Report from Partner Agencies Broward County Public Schools: Partnership & Internship Opportunities School Board Member Good reported that the Strategic Advisory Committee on Education and Development has received feedback from other Board members regarding Safe Walks to School Day, which will be held on October 5, She asked that members interested in participating reach out to Chris Ryan of MPO Staff. Enid Valdez, Director of Career, Technical, Adult, and Community Education (CTACE) for Broward County Public Schools, showed a PowerPoint presentation on the basics of this program. There are over 92 CTACE programs in Broward County public schools, including engineering, robotics, culinary training, finance, and global logistics. Over 8000 CTACE students receive industry credentials through the program, which means they receive college credit and/or allow them to be placed immediately in the workplace. Ms. Valdez advised that CTACE seeks to create a synergy with organizations such as the MPO in order to perpetuate internship opportunities. These opportunities allow students to earn credentials, develop a student portfolio at the senior level, allow concurrent dual enrollment, and teach soft skills such as confidence. She concluded that the partnership is off to a good start, with schools participating in MPO projects and providing students with access to an upcoming Board meeting. Mr. Ryan requested that agencies or other entities that can offer internship or shadowing opportunities contact him.

7 Page 7 CONSENT ITEMS C-1 MOTION TO ACCEPT the Quarterly Hazardous Walking Conditions Report (February 2016), Directing MPO Staff to Work with Partner Agencies to Reevaluate the List of Projects and Identify and Correct Hazardous Conditions Commissioner Simone pointed out that the majority of the conditions listed in the report are attributable to a lack of crossing guards. She asked if the MPO funds provision of crossing guards as well as capital improvements. Mr. Stuart replied that the MPO may only fund capital improvements. Commissioner Simone also pointed out that the report does not include a legend for the codes provided in the report. A copy of the legend was distributed to the Board members at this time. Commissioner Graziose advised that he was formerly one of the individuals responsible for the report, which was first issued in He explained some of the conditions associated with the report, as well as conditions not recognized by the State of Florida. He also provided a brief history of how the reports were compiled, including previous standards for roadways requiring crossing guards. The State has recently added two additional agencies (for a total of four partner agencies) that will work together to review areas and determine whether conditions are hazardous. These agencies are the School Board, the state or local government with jurisdiction over the road, the local Police Department, and the MPO. Commissioner Graziose continued that depending upon the number of students affected by the report, the School Board could receive up to $900,000 in transportation funds from the Florida Department of Education to provide transportation services for affected students. The State also wants hazardous conditions to be corrected, which includes substandard walking conditions (as defined by the State Statute) on major roadways and intersections in addition to the presence of crossing guards when warranted. Motion made by Mayor Ortis, seconded by School Board Member Good, to approve Item C-1. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS A-1 MOTION TO APPROVE the Draft FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for Submittal to Funding Agencies for Review Broward MPO Deputy Director Michael Ronskavitz explained that the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) covers a two-year period that begins on July 1, 2016 and ends June 30, It is the MPO s scope of work for projects and is required to receive funding from federal and State governments. While the UPWP comes before the Board every two years, amendments are presented to the Board for approval as they arise. Mr. Ronskavitz stated that the UPWP consists of six sections:

8 Page 8 1. Introduction 2. Organization and management 3. Work Program and tasks 4. Data collection 5. Program and plan development 6. 5 year Financial Plan The document serves as a business plan for the MPO s next two years. On March 15, 2016, it will be submitted to federal and State funding agencies for review, and will be returned to the MPO with comments on April 15, after which it will be presented to the Board for final approval in May. Motion made by Mayor Cooper, seconded by School Board Member Good, to approve. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. A-2 MOTION TO APPROVE: A. Advancing Strategic Initiatives Task Work Order No. 04 to support Strategic Business Plan Advisory Committees in an Amount Not to Exceed $19, Motion made by Mayor Ortis, seconded by Mayor Cooper, to approve. At this time Chair Blattner opened public comment. As there were no individuals wishing to speak on this Item, the Chair closed public comment and brought the discussion back to the Board. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. B. Advancing Strategic Initiatives Task Work Order No. 05 to Support the 2016 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant Application in an Amount Not to Exceed $27, Motion made by Mayor Cooper, seconded by Vice Chair Roberts, to approve. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. C. Advancing Strategic Initiatives Task Work Order No. 06 to Develop a Local Transportation Plan Guidebook in an Amount Not to Exceed $61, Motion made by Vice Chair Roberts, seconded by Mayor Cooper, to approve. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. A-3 MOTION TO ACCEPT the Audit Report Prepared for the Broward MPO Mr. Ronskavitz reported that there were no findings or deficiencies. It was noted that the auditor would be willing to attend the April meeting if the members wished to ask any

9 Page 9 questions regarding the audit. The members, having no questions on the Report, stated that a presentation would not be necessary. Motion made by Commissioner Mallozzi, seconded by Vice Mayor Adornato, to accept the audit. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. A-4 DISCUSSION AND MOTION(S) Regarding Local Surtax Options to Fund Transportation and Infrastructure Needs Todd Brauer, representing the Whitehouse Group, recalled that a Surtax Committee was seated in December 2015 to look into the issue of a transportation and/or infrastructure tax and determine whether or not it could succeed. At their January 17, 2016 meeting, the Committee discussed what must be done, and ultimately endorsed a one-cent infrastructure sales tax, which would provide approximately 60% to the County and 40% to the municipalities (by population). At their February 4 meeting, after working with Broward County and MPO staff, the Committee identified regional transportation issues and the importance of operations and maintenance issues in advancing transit plans. At that time, the Committee reevaluated their endorsement and recommended that 50% of surtax revenue go directly to Broward County, 25% to a regional transportation bank, and 25% to the municipalities themselves. There was also a suggestion that an independent oversight entity should be established to ensure projects move forward as intended. At their February 11 meeting, the MPO Board discussed this framework and determined that one half-cent would be used for transportation and one half-cent for infrastructure, with 50% of revenue going to the County, 25% to a regional transportation bank, and 25% to the municipalities by population, along with the establishment of an independent oversight board. This position would be a starting point from which any further negotiations occur between elected officials representing either municipalities or the County. On February 16, the Broward County Board of County Commissioners hosted a workshop to discuss the surtax further, including the need to identify funding for operations and maintenance as well as regional challenges. No action was taken by the Board of County Commissioners at that time; however, Broward County Commissioner Tim Ryan was designated as liaison from the Board of County Commissioners to work with the MPO Board on the surtax issue. The Surtax Committee met once again on March 3, where it was determined that a regional transportation bank was unlikely to be part of the final proposal. The Committee determined that the allocation of the transportation surtax would provide 65% of revenue directly to Broward County and 35% directly to the municipalities. By State Statute, this would mean 100% of the allocation would go to the County, although this may be changed by interlocal agreement. Mr. Brauer emphasized that the key issue is whether the surtax revenue would be an allocation, or if it would address the process through which municipal

10 Page 10 projects are achieved. He concluded that the County would have to undertake a discretionary process to determine how funds are distributed. At this time Chair Blattner opened public comment. As there were no individuals wishing to speak on this Item, the Chair closed public comment and brought the discussion back to the Board. The Board discussed the surtax further, with Mayor Cooper encouraging the Board of County Commissioners to acknowledge the needs of all Broward residents. She noted the leveraging power of transportation dollars and their ability to influence household incomes, and urged all present to work toward resolving this issue and take action. Mr. Brauer explained that the County did not discuss an infrastructure tax, but a transportation tax only. He added that the workshop showed there was little support for splitting the revenue, as that would require two referenda on the ballot. Another difficulty has been the compilation of a list of projects for which the surtax revenue could be used. He characterized the issue as one of top-down versus bottom-up government. Mr. Brauer continued that many of the projects submitted have been representative of larger issues, including not only transportation aspects but others. School Board Member Good asked that Broward County Public Schools be kept in mind during the process, as they are a major transit provider within the County. Commissioner Holness recalled that the last time a surtax was placed on the ballot, the allocation to the municipalities was 10%, which many cities would not have been able to use. He felt the percentage should be determined so the Board may make an informed decision on how to proceed. He noted that the County would be in charge of the distribution of surtax revenue, and briefly reviewed the allowable uses for this revenue. Mr. Brauer stated that from the MPO s perspective, a budget is determined and then projects are built into it; however, this is not the same process used by the County. Commissioner Holness confirmed that if this issue is placed on the ballot, it will be placed there by the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Ryan observed that the infrastructure surtax is no longer an option for this election cycle. With regard to the distribution of a transportation surtax, he advised that he objected to a direct allocation of revenue to the municipalities, which he felt would be contrary to the core mission of the MPO, as it would not deliver the best projects to improve transportation throughout the County. He concluded that he would propose a higher percentage to the municipalities, with the understanding that it would benefit County roadways as well as municipal streets and highways. He felt the MPO, not the municipalities, should prioritize these projects. Commissioner Ryan asserted that he would recommend a 60% allocation of surtax revenue directly to the County for transit, including buses, light rail, or traffic light synchronization. He recommended that the remaining 40% be used for County and

11 Page 11 municipal roadway projects, prioritized by the MPO in accordance with its planning and public input protocols. He characterized this as a compromise for all parties. Commissioner Mallozzi emphasized the need for both the County and the municipalities to back the initiative. While she was supportive of a transportation surtax, she pointed out that her municipality alone has $71 million in transportation needs. She concluded that many municipalities may not use the 35% to 40% they would receive in surtax revenue, and suggested that these unused funds could revert to the County. Vice Chair Roberts requested clarification of how the 60/40 proposal offered by Commissioner Ryan would be prioritized. Commissioner Ryan explained that 40% would be allocated for roadway projects throughout the County, including operations and maintenance expenses for those roadways. Vice Chair Roberts asked if this would mean the County would stipulate in the ILA that expenditure of the 40% would be established by the MPO. Commissioner Ryan agreed that this would be the concept, although he did not wish to state that the MPO would directly control the distribution of the 40%. Chair Blattner advised that he would not be able to support Commissioner Ryan s proposal because it was limited to a transportation surtax only and did not address nontransportation issues such as connectivity, landscaping, lighting, and other concerns. He felt the Statute enabling the infrastructure surtax would allow the funding of a broader range of eligible projects. Commissioner Sofield stated that 100% of surtax revenue should go into a single fund controlled by a separate entity. The proposed surtax would produce approximately $300 million per year, with $150 million going to the County. Under the previously discussed 50/25/25 split, municipalities would receive $75 million for their own projects, with the remaining $75 million going into a regional transit bank. He did not feel the surtax should be passed in a form other than the 50/25/25 split, which meets the needs of all parties. He urged the Board not to pass the version of the surtax as described by Commissioner Ryan. Commissioner Graziose observed that the County did not wish to pass the 50/25/25 split because they felt smaller cities would not be able to spend their funds on the projects. He pointed out that many of the city roads in North Lauderdale are more than 55 years old; however, if there is no guaranteed percentage going to the municipalities, he felt there will be too many strings attached to these funds to allow the cities to use them. He concluded that in order for him to approve a plan, the cities must receive a percentage of the surtax revenue. Vice Chair Caletka requested clarification of whether the deadline for filing a ballot would be in May or June Mr. Brauer replied that any resolution must be filed by June 20, 2016; furthermore, if the proposed surtax is for transportation, only the Board of County Commissioners would be able to file. An infrastructure surtax could be filed by either the Board of County Commissioners or the governing boards representing 51% of the total population of Broward County. If the municipalities wish to move forward with the infrastructure surtax, both initiatives could be placed on the November ballot.

12 Page 12 Mayor Cooper reiterated that if there is not a dedicated percentage for the cities, any ballot initiative would fail because cities would not support it. Mr. Brauer clarified that the key issue remains that these funds may not be spent on operations or maintenance costs, but must be spent on capital funds. Chair Blattner stated that he has requested information from MPO Staff regarding examples of the types of projects eligible for funding through an infrastructure surtax. Commissioner Rogers pointed out that nearly all members of the Board represent individual cities and towns. He also noted that the proposal offered by the Surtax Committee automatically terminates on March 24, 2016 if the Board of County Commissioners does not act upon it. He concluded that the Board must craft a compromise that can be sent to the County, and that he felt it was possible to live with the proposed Resolution as presented. Motion made by Commissioner Rogers, seconded by Vice Chair Roberts, to forward the Surtax Committee s recommendation to the County Commission as the MPO s position. It was clarified that the Surtax Committee s recommendation was for a 65/35 division of surtax revenue. Vice Chair Roberts offered an amendment to the motion: in the event that the County Commission does not accept [the Surtax Committee s recommendation], that the MPO will move forward with a sales tax plan, and the cutoff date for the County is April 1. The Board members discussed the amendment, with Mayor Cooper and Vice Mayor Green speaking in favor of making the amendment a separate entity from the original motion. Vice Mayor Green pointed out that in order to sell the surtax to residents of a city, that city must receive some share of the surtax revenue. He felt the true reason a surtax had failed in 2006 was because 90% of the funds would go to the County, which was not specific about how those funds would be spent. Vice Chair Caletka proposed a different amendment to the motion, which would state that, regardless of whether or not the County approves the Surtax Committee s recommendation, Staff should begin work on an infrastructure surtax. Mr. Brauer emphasized that the MPO educates the public and supports the governing bodies of the municipalities, 51% of which would ultimately be responsible for placing an infrastructure tax on the ballot. He added that the Board of County Commissioners does not take official action on the recommendation until April 5. Mayor Ortis advised that it is not possible to entertain a second amendment while the original amendment is still under discussion. He continued that he agreed with the amendment proposed by Vice Chair Roberts, as the municipalities need services for their roadways.

13 Page 13 Commissioner Holness suggested that the reason the proposed surtax failed in 2006 was because the Board of County Commissioners was divided on whether or not to support it. He emphasized the need for agreement at the County as well as at the municipal level. School Board Member Good asked if voters in November would know how the municipalities will spend their allocations. Chair Blattner replied that the Statute provides a broad definition of eligible projects, and reiterated that more specific definitions are needed. If the recommendation is adopted, municipalities are likely to reach out to their residents and request input on projects those residents would like to see funded through surtax revenue. Attorney Gabriel explained that the State Legislature has adopted a bill, which is on its way to the Governor s Office, which would restrict the ability to place referenda on ballots outside of a general election year. If a referendum is placed on a ballot in a year other than a general election year, the bill would increase the percentage by which a referendum must pass to 60% plus one. It was noted that while the Resolution is set to terminate automatically by March 24, the Board of County Commissioners will next meet on April 5. It was suggested that the Resolution s termination date be amended to April 5 to correct this disparity. Chair Blattner stated that this would be made part of the amendment. Motion made by Mayor Cooper, seconded by Mayor Ortis, to call the question. In a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously. The amendment was restated as follows: passing the 65/35 would be presented to the Broward County Commission; if no action is taken by April 5, then at that time the cities would work together to move toward an infrastructure tax at one penny. Vice Chair Roberts stated that he did not want to delay the process of approving an infrastructure surtax until after April 5, but instead wished to pursue both options at the same time. It was clarified that the amendment would direct Staff to draft an infrastructure Resolution. In a show of hands, the amendment passed 15-2 (Commissioners Holness and Bogen dissenting). In a show of hands, the amended motion passed 15-2 (Commissioners Holness and Bogen dissenting). There being no further business to come before the Board at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 12:33 p.m.

14 Page 14 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS AD-1 Broward MPO Outreach & Events January/February 2016 AD-2 Speak Up Broward Quarterly Update Jan-Mar 2016 AD-3 The Broward MPO and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) plan to jointly perform an interim roadway functional class assessment, with special emphasis placed on public roads not currently eligible for federal aid funds from FHWA for disaster recovery and other purposes. Municipalities interested in participating in the interim assessment, please visit: AD-4 March is Florida Bike Month For Bike Month Events, visit our web site at: AD-5 Quiet Zone Designation Update NEXT MEETING: April 14, 2016