AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MONONA PUBLIC LIBRARY MUNICIPAL ROOM 1000 NICHOLS ROAD MONDAY, JUNE 4, :00 P.M.

Transcription

1 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MONONA PUBLIC LIBRARY MUNICIPAL ROOM 1000 NICHOLS ROAD MONDAY, JUNE 4, :00 P.M. A. Call to Order. B. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance. C. Approval of Minutes from May 21, D. Appearances. E. Public Hearing. (None) F. Consent Agenda. 1. Approval of Applications for 2018/2019 Operator Licenses: a. Daniel R. Lowndes, Fraboni s Italian Specialties b. Araceli Angeles, La Rosita Mexican Buffet c. Anel L. Rodriguez, La Rosita Mexican Buffet d. Lizeth Martinez, La Rosita Mexican Buffet e. Beatriz Manjarrez, La Rosita Mexican Store 2. Approval of Applications for 2018/2020 Operator Licenses: a. Yolanda Cardenas, La Rosita Mexican Buffet b. Karla Quechol Jimenez, La Rosita Mexican Buffet c. Lina Hernandez, La Rosita Mexican Store d. Susana Olivos, La Rosita Mexican Store e. Juan Perez, La Rosita Mexican Store 3. Approval of Renewal Application for 2018/2020 Operator License: a. Cory M. Hayes, Tully s II 4. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Class A Fermented Malt Beverage License: a. La Rosita Mexican Store, LLC, d/b/a La Rosita Mexican Store, 6005 Monona Drive 5. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Class "A Fermented Malt Beverage and Class A Liquor (Cider Only) Licenses: a. Kwik Trip, Inc., P. O. Box 2107, La Crosse, Wisconsin, , d/b/a Kwik Trip 966, 105 East Broadway b. Shopko Holding Company LLC, 700 Pilgrim Way, Green Bay, Wisconsin, d/b/a Shopko #32, 2101 West Broadway c. Speedway LLC, P. O. Box 1580, Springfield, OH, 45501, d/b/a Speedway #4088, 5450 Monona Drive d. Speedway LLC, P. O. Box 1580, Springfield, OH, 45501, d/b/a Speedway #4533, 2500 Royal Avenue 6. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Class A Fermented Malt Beverage and Class A Liquor Licenses: a. Fellerson, Inc., 5725 Monona Drive, Monona, Wisconsin, 53716, d/b/a Ken's Meats & Deli, 5725 Monona Drive

2 b. Maroon Way Holdings, Inc., 4967 Highwood Circle, Middleton, Wisconsin, 53562, d/b/a Monona Mart, 1220 East Broadway c. W.D.S. Inc., 704 Raymond Road, Waunakee, Wisconsin, , d/b/a O Connell s Liquor, 6325 Monona Drive d. Ultimate Mart, LLC, P. O. Box , Nashville, Tennessee, , d/b/a Pick n Save #8181, 6540 Monona Drive e. Walgreen Co, P. O. Box 901, Deerfield, Illinois, , d/b/a Walgreens #4830, 5300 Monona Drive f. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 702 Southwest 8 th Street, Licensing Department 8916, Bentonville, Arkansas, , d/b/a Wal-Mart Supercenter #3857, 2151 Royal Avenue 7. Renewal Application for 2018/2019 Class A Liquor License: a. Fraboni s Italian Specialties, Inc., d/b/a Fraboni s, 108 Owen Road 8. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Class B Fermented Malt Beverage and Class B Liquor Licenses: a. T. L. McGuigan, LLC, d/b/a Angelo s, 5801 Monona Drive b. Breakwater Monona, LLC, 7497 Indigo Circle, Middleton, Wisconsin, 53562, d/b/a Breakwater, 6308 Metropolitan Lane c. Blazin Wings, Inc., 5500 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1600, Minneapolis, Minnesota, , d/b/a Buffalo Wild Wings, 6544 Monona Drive d. The East Side Club, Inc., d/b/a The East Side Club, 3735 Monona Drive e. Mr. Luo LLC Owned by Jun Luo, d/b/a Edo Garden Japanese Restaurant, 6309 Monona Drive f. Fat Jacks Monona, Inc., d/b/a Fat Jack s Barbecue, 6207 Monona Drive g. Joe s Fire Station LLC, 1910 Tarragon Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, , d/b/a Joe's Fire Station, 900 East Broadway h. Monona Garden Family Restaurant, Inc., d/b/a Monona Garden Family Restaurant, 6501 Bridge Road i. Pizza Oven of Monona LLC, d/b/a The Pizza Oven, 5511 Monona Drive j. Red Robin International, Inc., 6312 South Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 200N, Greenwood Village, Colorado, , d/b/a Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, 6522 Monona Drive k. Valdimark, Inc., d/b/a Silver Eagle Bar & Grill, 5805 Monona Drive l. Snick s Sportsman s Bar, LLC, d/b/a Snick s Sportsman's Bar, 4605 Monona Drive m. Tasting Room of Monona Inc., d/b/a The Tasting Room, 6000 Monona Drive, Suite 103 n. Wiltzius LLC, d/b/a Tower Inn, 1008 East Broadway o. Leskes Inc., d/b/a Tully s II Food & Spirits, 6401 Monona Drive p. Badger Bowl, Inc., d/b/a Monona Village Lanes, 208 Owen Road q. FHMonona, LLC, 622 Stockton Court, Madison, Wisconsin, 53711, d/b/a Waypoint Public House, 320 West Broadway, Suite E 9. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Class B Fermented Malt Beverage and Class C Wine Licenses: a. Huang & Lin China Star LLC Owned by Ming Yi Huang, d/b/a China Star Restaurant, 111 River Place b. Mr Brews Tap House Monona LLC, d/b/a Mr Brews Tap House Monona, 103 West Broadway, Suite B c. Shrestha Family LLC Owned by Madan Shrestha, d/b/a Swad Indian Restaurant, 6007A Monona Drive d. WB South, LLC, d/b/a World Buffet, 2451 West Broadway 10. Renewal Application for 2018/2019 Class B Fermented Malt Beverage License: a. La Rosita Mexican Buffet LLC, d/b/a La Rosita Mexican Buffet, 6001 Monona Drive b. Mitchell Marks, d/b/a Monona Community Center, 1011 Nichols Road

3 11. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Patio Permits: a. Breakwater Monona, LLC d/b/a Breakwater, 6308 Metropolitan Lane b. La Rosita Mexican Buffet LLC, d/b/a La Rosita Mexican Buffet, 6001 Monona Drive c. Mr Brews Tap House Monona LLC, W12674 State Road 188, Lodi, Wisconsin, , d/b/a Mr Brews Tap House Monona, 103 West Broadway, Suite B d. Badger Bowl, Inc., 506 E. Badger Road, Madison, Wisconsin, , d/b/a Monona Village Lanes, 208 Owen Road e. FHMonona, LLC, 960 John Nolen Drive, Apartment 308, Madison, Wisconsin, , d/b/a Waypoint Public House, 320 West Broadway, Suite E 12. Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Beer Gardens: a. Badger Bowl, Inc., 506 E. Badger Road, Madison, Wisconsin, , d/b/a Monona Village Lanes, 208 Owen Road (approved for specific dates) b. Breakwater Monona, LLC d/b/a Breakwater, 6308 Metropolitan Lane G. Council Action Items. 1. Unfinished Business. a. Convene in Closed Session under Wisconsin Statute section 19.85(1)(e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session (Development Agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC). b. Reconvene in Open Session Under Wisconsin Statute Section 19.85(2). * c. Consideration of Resolution Approving a Revised Development Agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC (Community Development Authority). d. Consideration of Ordinance Amending Chapter of the Code of Ordinances Regarding Historic Conservation (Landmarks Commission, Plan Commission). 2. New Business. * a. Consideration of Renewal Application for 2018/2019 Patio Permit with New Variance for Valdimark, Inc., d/b/a Silver Eagle Bar & Grill, 5805 Monona Drive. (License Review Committee). b. Consideration of Ordinance Establishing Temporary No Parking on Winnequah Road (Ad Hoc Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee). c. Consideration of Ordinance Establishing No Parking Here to Corner on Owen Road (Ad Hoc Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee). H. Reports of Committees, Commissions, Boards, Mayor, City Administrator, City Attorney, and Department Managers. 1. Agendas, Supporting Documents, and Minutes are Available on the Monona Web Page *request for immediate action

4 I. Appointments. 1. Andrew Piec to the Tourism Commission (effective immediately April 2019). 2. Cheryl DeVault to the Public Safety Committee (effective immediately April 2021). J. Adjournment. NOTE: Upon reasonable notice, the City of Monona will accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through auxiliary aids or services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Joan Andrusz at (608) (not a TDD telephone number) Fax: (608) or through the City Police Department TDD telephone number The public is notified that any final action taken at a previous meeting may be reconsidered pursuant to the City of Monona ordinances. A suspension of the rules may allow for final action to be taken on an item of New Business. It is possible that members of and a possible quorum of members of other governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above stated meeting to gather information or speak about a subject over which they have decision-making responsibility. Any governmental body at the above stated meeting will take no action other than the governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice. POSTED June 1, 2018 on the City Hall, Library, and Community Center bulletin boards and on the City of Monona s website mymonona.com. S:\City Council\AGENDAS\AGENDA Council docx

5 MONONA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 21, 2018 The regular meeting of the Monona City Council was called to order by Mayor O Connor at 7:03 p.m. Present: Also Present: Mayor Mary K. O Connor, Alderpersons Jennifer Kuhr, Molly Grupe, Nancy Moore, Chad Speight, Doug Wood, and Andrew Kitslaar City Administrator April Little, City Attorney William Cole, City Planner/Economic Development Director Sonja Kruesel, Public Works Director Dan Stephany, Operations Lieutenant Curt Wiegel, and City Clerk Joan Andrusz ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES Alder Moore wished to clarify that during consideration of liquor licenses at the last meeting the Council was getting into a discussion on the merits of the type of liquor, craft cocktails versus regular drinks, and the type and size of glass; it made her uncomfortable that the Council was getting into those distinctions and it didn t move the discussion forward. A motion by Alder Wood, seconded by Alder Kuhr to approve the Minutes of the May 7, 2018 City Council meeting, was carried. APPEARANCES There were no Appearances. PUBLIC HEARING There was no Public Hearing. CONSENT AGENDA A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Wood to approve the following, was carried: 1. Approval of Application for 2018/2019 Operator License: a. Darin J. Wimann, Snicks Sportman s Bar 2. Approval of Renewal Applications for 2018/2019 Operator Licenses: a. Austen R. Williams, The Pizza Oven b. Norma C. Holt, Tower Inn c. Damon A. Okeson, Tower Inn d. Jeff D. Zumstein, Tower Inn 3. Approval of Renewal Applications for 2018/2020 Operator Licenses: a. Stephanie A. Pyke, Snicks Sportman s Bar b. Kelly A. Hamel, Tully s II c. Cathy Howland, Tully s II/O Connell s Liquor d. Jill A. Tollefson Blaney, Tully s II

6 MONONA CITY COUNCIL May 21, 2018 Page 2 e. Tonya L. Yancey, Tully s II UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no Unfinished Business. NEW BUSINESS A motion by Alder Wood, seconded by Alder Speight to suspend the rules and take action on the 2018 Temporary Class B Fermented Malt Beverage and Temporary Class B Wine Retailer s License Application for Monona Pee Wee Football 50 th Year Celebration, President Morrie Haukereid, 5513 Winnequah Road, Monona, Wisconsin, 53716, for the Period of August 11, 2018, was carried. Alder Wood reported the event is in celebration of Morrie Haukereid s 50 years working with the Monona Pee Wee Football league. It will be held at Ahuska Park with a band, double fencing, and licensed Operators. A motion by Alder Wood, seconded by Alder Speight to approve the 2018 Temporary Class B Fermented Malt Beverage and Temporary Class B Wine Retailer s License Application for Monona Pee Wee Football 50 th Year Celebration, President Morrie Haukereid, 5513 Winnequah Road, Monona, Wisconsin, 53716, for the Period of August 11, 2018, was carried. A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Grupe to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Approval of Participation in a Wisconsin Bureau of Transportation Safety Grant Titled: 2018 SPEED Task Force Grant, was carried. Operations Lieutenant Wiegel reported this is a $35,000 grant divided between the 7 Task Force jurisdictions. Monona will receive $5,000 with a 25% match offset by hours, mileage, and benefits. There will be nine 4-hour shifts in each of the 3 months starting June 1 through August 31. A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Kuhr to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Approval of Participation in a Wisconsin Bureau of Transportation Safety Grant Titled: 2018 SPEED Task Force Grant, was carried. A motion by Alder Kuhr, seconded by Alder Moore to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Approval to Submit 2017 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report (CMAR) Review and Recommendations, was carried. Public Works Director Stephany reported this is an annual sanitary sewer system report card required by the DNR. The City received a Grade A. Financial backing is available for pump and lift station maintenance and the work done is compliant with DNR regulations. The report was reviewed, including future planning, work on McKenna Road, the goals of the utility, cleaning, and televising. There are 39.2 miles of sanitary sewer under the streets, a lot for a small community. Four sources of Infiltration and Inflow a roof drain system, a hole in the casting to the grinder station, seams that weren t grouted, and drain tile issues were all repaired. The 2018 study will begin soon. Last year was the first year usage was required to be reported. Usage is consistent this year; comparisons will be able to be made in future. A motion by Alder Kuhr, seconded by Alder Kitslaar to approve Resolution Approval to Submit 2017 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report (CMAR) Review and Recommendations, was carried.

7 MONONA CITY COUNCIL May 21, 2018 Page 3 A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Speight to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Approving the Plan Commission Recommendation for the Yahara Commons Development Revised GDP and Phase III PIP, was carried. City Planner Kruesel reported Council approval is required by a section of the Zoning Code. On May 14 the Plan Commission approved the replacement of office use by a hotel and the hotel plans. The hotel has to meet the 40% standard for stormwater; they were showing only 16% but can easily meet and exceed per Strand Associates review. The CDA approved parking stalls as planned; location of stalls and street parking was reviewed and green space discussed. Stalls removed for tree planting will be replaced elsewhere. Four stalls were removed from street parking because they were too close to Bridge Road. A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Speight to approve Resolution Approving the Plan Commission Recommendation for the Yahara Commons Development Revised GDP and Phase III PIP, was carried. A motion by Alder Moore, seconded by Alder Grupe to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Authorization of New Construction Proposed Within Redevelopment Area #9 for Yahara Commons Revised GDP and Phase III PIP, was carried. City Planner Kruesel reported this is a separate requirement for Council approval. The CDA will review this tomorrow night and that body s approval is part of this Resolution. A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Speight to approve Resolution Authorization of New Construction Proposed Within Redevelopment Area #9 for Yahara Commons Revised GDP and Phase III PIP, was carried. A motion by Alder Speight, seconded by Alder Moore to Convene in Closed Session under Wisconsin Statute section 19.85(1)(e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session (West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC Development Agreement and Amendment #2 to the Development Agreement with Yahara Riverfront Development, LLC, et. al, both of which pertain to the Monona Riverfront Redevelopment Project). On a roll call vote, all members voted in favor of the motion. Upon reconvening in Open Session: A motion by Alder Grupe, seconded by Alder Kitslaar to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Approving a Revised Development Agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC, was carried. A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Moore to amend Resolution Approving a Revised Development Agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC as follows: Exhibit F, Phase 2 Infrastructure: section #1 language will be as approved by the City Council on April 16, 2018 and Park Parcel infrastructure in section #3 and Park Parcel amenities in section #4 will be completed by the Phase 3 completion deadline, was carried. A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Kuhr to approve Resolution Approving a Revised Development Agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC, as amended, was carried.

8 MONONA CITY COUNCIL May 21, 2018 Page 4 A motion by Alder Kuhr, seconded by Alder Kitslaar to suspend the rules and take action on Resolution Approving A Second Amendment to the Development Agreement with Yahara Riverfront Development, LLC; YRFD Phase 1 Land, Inc.; YRFD Phase 2 Land, Inc.; and YRFD Phase 3 Land, Inc., was carried. A motion by Alder Kuhr, seconded by Alder Grupe to approve Resolution Approving A Second Amendment to the Development Agreement with Yahara Riverfront Development, LLC; YRFD Phase 1 Land, Inc.; YRFD Phase 2 Land, Inc.; and YRFD Phase 3 Land, Inc., was carried. City Planner Kruesel provided information on Ordinance Amending Chapter of the Code of Ordinances Regarding Historic Conservation. There have been improvements and clarifications since the re-codification last fall. The changes are not substantive. Changes were reviewed including the Certification of Appropriateness and the nomination process is defined and clarified. Changes are exactly as recommend by the Landmarks Commission. The Plan Commission wanted removal of language regarding who could nominate a landmark and carry it through. It was decided that anyone could nominate but the Plan Commission would review and approve it. Alder Wood provided information on this disagreement between Commissions. He wanted it to be any person because a former Monona resident would not be able to nominate a structure and a Plan Commission member may not be interested in a particular style of structure. The nomination still goes through the Plan Commission either way. Alder Moore reported the nomination process is on the owner s part with research and detail provided to the Plan Commission; otherwise, all that work would have to be done by the Plan Commission. Alder Speight stated he disagreed with the Plan Commission on this issue. The process outlined takes care of that concern because the Plan Commission and City Council make the final decision. The process addresses the Plan Commission s concern. Alder Moore stated the Plan Commission struggled with home owner approval. City Planner Kruesel stated to be a Certified Local Government owner consent cannot be required. REPORTS Members announced upcoming meeting dates and times. Alder Grupe reported the Library Board is working on dementia friendly kits designed for caretakers of those affected to stimulate brain-boosting activities. One Story, Many Voices projects received grants. The summer reading program, Libraries Rock!, starts June 1. Alder Speight reported commuter bus service ridership has increased 20%. The Transit Commission will work on advertisements. Alder Wood reported at tonight s Finance & Personnel Committee meeting the end of the financial report included transit ridership numbers. The May 8 pedestrian/bicycle public information meeting at Winnequah School went very well with 60 to 65 attendees. Tom Lynch from Strand Associates presented information and gathered feedback. His report and slideshow are available on the City s website and on a YouTube video and provides links. Alder Kitslaar reported the Tourism Commission had a positive meeting and announced that grant opportunities are available. Funds will be awarded to entities for planned activities. $30,000 is available; more information will follow.

9 MONONA CITY COUNCIL May 21, 2018 Page 5 City Clerk Andrusz reported the Board of Review hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, May 30 at 6:00 p.m. in the Library Municipal Room. Intent to Object notifications are due on May 28, Memorial Day. The formal Department of Revenue objection form is due by 8:00 p.m. on the day of the hearing. Property owners who wish to be added to the docket should contact her at Mayor O Connor reported the Memorial Day Parade is next Monday at 10:00 a.m. Alder Wood noted the high number of participating members; all except Alder Speight, who will be out of town, will be part of the parade. Mayor O Connor reported she met with City Administrator Little and Finance Director Houtakker regarding the Capital Budget. Department Heads have been notified that she wants to keep borrowing to $2 million, lower than usual, to free up debt capacity to allow for facility planning. City Administrator Little reminded members that anything not relating to the Riverfront Development is included in this borrowing. APPOINTMENTS A motion by Alder Kitslaar, seconded by Alder Wood to approve Robert Larsen, Chair, Board of Review (effective immediately through April, 2019), was carried. ADJOURNMENT A motion by Alder Moore, seconded by Alder Grupe to adjourn, was carried. (8:20 p.m.) Joan Andrusz City Clerk

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53 Resolution No Monona Common Council APPROVING A REVISED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH WEST BROADWAY HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC WHEREAS, the City Attorney and staff negotiated a development agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC for a 5-story, 92-room hotel within the Yahara riverfront redevelopment; and, WHEREAS, the Common Council found it to be in the public interest to enter into the development agreement and approved the agreement on April 16, 2018 per Resolution , then approved revisions to the agreement on May 21, 2018 per Resolution ; and, WHEREAS, the City Attorney and CDA Chairman then subsequently negotiated changes to the agreement prior to its execution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Monona, Dane County, Wisconsin, hereby resolves to accept and approve the attached development agreement with West Broadway Hotel Associates, LLC in place of the one approved on May 21, The mayor and city staff are authorized to execute same and take all further action as necessary to implement it. Adopted this day of, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MONONA, WISCONSIN Mary K. O Connor Mayor ATTEST: Joan Andrusz City Clerk Requested By: Community Development Authority 5/22/18 Council Action: Date Introduced: Date Approved: Date Disapproved:

54 Ordinance No Monona Common Council AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING HISTORIC CONSERVATION WHEREAS, the purpose and intent of the historic conservation ordinance is the protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of improvements of special character or special historical interest or value that are in the public interest; and, WHEREAS, the Landmarks Commission discussed this topic at its April 11, 2018 meeting and is recommending the Code of Ordinances be amended to reflect these changes; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission held a prehearing conference to discuss this topic at their meeting on February 12, 2018 and held a public hearing at their meeting on May 14, 2018 which was preceded by a published Class II notice in Monona s The Herald Independent newspaper; and. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Monona, Dane County, Wisconsin, do hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 480, Section 20 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as stated in the attached exhibit. SECTION 2: Chapter 480, Section 20, Sub. S (1) of the City of Monona Code of Ordinances Fees, Fines, and Penalties Schedule is hereby amended to add the following fees: General Penalty for Failure to Obtain Certificate of Appropriateness Not to Exceed $50 / Day. SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication as provided by law. Adopted this day of, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MONONA, WISCONSIN Mary K. O Connor Mayor ATTEST: Joan Andrusz City Clerk Approval Recommended by: Landmarks Commission 4/11/2018 and Plan Commission with Amendments 5/14/2018 Drafted by: Sonja Kruesel, City Planner 5/16/2018 Council Action: Date Introduced: Date Approved: Date Disapproved:

55 5211 SCHLUTER ROAD MONONA, WI CITY HALL (608) FAX (608) MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Sonja Kruesel, City Planner & Economic Development Director DATE: May 16, 2018 RE: Proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance Landmarks Commission Recommendation The redline version of the ordinance included in your packet is the version recommended by the Landmarks Commission. Plan Commission Recommendation The Plan Commission also recommended approval at their meeting on May 14, There was an original motion to approve the proposed ordinance, followed by an amendment to the motion as noted below. The amendment passed with five members voting in favor and two members voting against. Under Section D Nomination, remove reference to Any Person, as long as we would still qualify as a Certified Local Government. Only the Landmarks Commission may nominate for designation as a landmark. The current ordinance allows any person to nominate a landmark which initiates the process. Any person submitting a nomination must complete the required forms and documenation before Landmarks Commission and ultimately City Council would consider it. If you wish to view the Plan Commission s discussion and specific comments you can watch the May 14, 2018 video via YouTube on the Monona Community Media channel starting at 2:08 on the clock (link provided). The discussion surrounding the above amendment specifically, begins at 2:36 on the clock

56 Historic preservation. [Amended by Ord. No ] A. Purpose and intent. The protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of improvements of special character or special historical interest or value are in the public interest. The purpose of historic conservation is to: (1) Protect, enhance and perpetuate improvements and districts which represent or reflect elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political and architectural history; (2) Safeguard the City's historic and cultural heritage, as embodied and reflected in such landmarks and historic districts; (3) Stabilize and improve property values; (4) Foster civic pride in the beauty and noble accomplishments of the past; (5) Protect and enhance the City's attractions to residents, tourist and visitors, and serve as a support and stimulus to business and industry; (6) Strengthen the economy of the City; and (7) Promote the use of historic districts and landmarks for the education, pleasure and welfare of the people of the City. B. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: LANDMARK STRUCTURE Any improvement which has a special character or special historic interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, state or nation, and which has been designated as a landmark pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. LANDMARK SITE Any parcel of land of historic significance due to a substantial value in tracing the history of aboriginal people or upon which an historic event has occurred, and which has been designated as a landmark site under this chapter, or a parcel or part thereof on which is situated a landmark. HISTORIC DISTRICT Any area designated pursuant to the provisions of this chapter that contains two or more historic improvements or sites as well as those abutting improvement parcels which the Commission determines should fall under the provisions of this section to assure that their appearance and development is harmonious with such landmarks or landmark sites. CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES Contributing resources are the buildings, objects, sites and structures that played a role or, more simply, existed at the time the event associated with the proposed historic landmark occurred. The resources status as contributing shall be identified on the official landmark designation. NONCONTRIBUTING RESOURCES Noncontributing resources are the buildings, objects, sties, and structures that did not exist at the time the event(s) associated with the proposed historic landmark occurred or have lost integrity from that historic period. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The certificate issued which approves alteration, rehabilitation, construction, reconstruction or razing of a historic structure or site or any improvement in a historic district.

57 C. Historic structure, site, and district designation criteria. For the purposes of this chapter, a historic structure, site, or district designation may be placed on any site, natural or improved, including any building, improvement or structure located thereon, or any area of particular historic, architectural, or cultural significance to the city, which: (1) Exemplify or reflect the broad cultural, political, economic or social history of the nation, state or community; or (2) Are associated with the lives of important persons or with important events in national, state or local history; or (3) Embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type inherently valuable for a study of a period, style, method of construction or of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or (4) Are representative of the notable work of a master builder, designer or architect; or (5) Exhibit important archaeological or anthropological significance. D. Nomination. Any person, or the Landmarks Commission, may nominate a building or structure, site, or historic district for designation as a landmark. The person or Commission shall submit the nomination to the City Planning Division, to the attention of the City Planner, on a nomination form approved by the Landmarks Commission. The nomination shall clearly identify the proposed landmark structure, landmark site, or historic district and document why it qualifies under Subsection C. The City Planner may ask the person or Commission to submit additional information and documentation as needed to complete or clarify the nomination. When the City Planner determines that the nomination is complete, the City Planner shall refer the nomination to the Landmarks Commission. Any property nominated for landmark status located within a redevelopment area or tax increment financing district shall also be referred to the Community Development Authority for review and recommendation prior to Common Council action. E. Landmarks Commission review and public hearing of nomination. Whenever the Landmarks Commission receives a complete, accurate nomination under Subsection D, the Commission shall review the nomination. As part of its review, the Commission shall hold a public hearing, preceded by a Class I notice and notice to the owner of record of the proposed landmark, and to the owner of record of each lot located within 200 feet of the lot on which the proposed landmark is located. If any person or persons other than the owner of record files the nomination, the owner of record shall be notified of the nomination via certified mail no later than ten days prior to the public hearing. F. Designation. After the Landmarks Commission holds a public hearing and completes its review under Subsection E, the Commission shall file a report recommending approval, disapproval, or approval subject to conditions. Final approval of the designation shall be granted by the Common Council. Once designated, such historic structures, sites, and districts shall be subject to all provisions of this chapter. G. Notification and recording of designation. The City Clerk shall promptly notify the Building Inspector of each landmark designation, as well as the owner of record of the site. The City Clerk shall record the designation with the Dane County Register of Deeds at the City s expense. H. Voluntary supplemental restrictions. The Common Council may at any time supplement the terms of a landmark designation, pursuant to an agreement between the landmark owner and the Landmarks Commission, to enhance the preservation and protection of the landmark. I. Recognition of landmarks. Whenever the Common Council designates a landmark under Subsection F, the Landmarks Commission may affix a plaque identifying the property as a landmark to the landmark or landmark site with the permission of the owner or, in the absence of permission, in the public right-of-way as approved by the Public Works Director. The plaque shall be placed so that it is easily visible to passing pedestrians. In the case of a landmark structure, the plaque or sign shall

58 include the accepted name of the landmark, the date of its construction, and other information that the Landmarks Commission considers appropriate. In the case of a landmark that is not a structure, the plaque or sign shall include the common name of the landmark and other information that the Commission considers appropriate. If the Commission determines that, because the landmark is ecologically or culturally sensitive, a plaque or sign would be inappropriate, no plaque or sign is required. No person may remove or modify a plaque without approval of the City Planner. J. Amending or rescinding a landmark designation. Any person may petition the Landmarks Commission to amend or rescind a Landmark Designation. The process for amending a landmark shall be the same as for designating a landmark under Subsections D through G above. K. Regulation of construction, reconstruction or alterations. If an application for a zoning or building permit for exterior work involves a landmark structure, landmark site, or a contributing resource within a historic district, the permit shall first be referred to the Landmarks Commission for consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness. No permit may be issued until the Commission has issued a Certificate of Appropriateness under Subsection N. In cases where a building permit is not required, ordinary maintenance and repairs may be undertaken without a certificate of appropriateness provided that the work involves repairs to existing features of a historic structure or site or the replacement of elements of a structure with pieces and materials identical in appearance and provided that the work does not change the exterior appearance of the structure or site. This consideration shall be based on the considerations below, and the United States Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation, 36 CFR 67. (1) Whether the proposed work would detrimentally change, destroy or adversely affect any architectural feature of the landmark; and (2) In the case of a new construction, whether the exterior of such construction would be in harmony with the external appearance of other landmarks on the site; and (3) Whether the proposal would significantly alter or destroy the historic characteristics of the landmark or the landmark site. L. Regulation of demolition. No permit to demolish all or part of a historic structure or contributing resource in a historic district, shall be granted by the Building Inspector except as follows: (1) No person in charge of an historic structure shall be granted a permit to demolish such property under any circumstances without first receiving the written approval of the Commission. (2) At the time a person applies for a permit to demolish such property, an application shall be forwarded to the Commission. The Commission may refuse to grant written approval of a period of up to six months from the time of the application, during which time the Commission and the applicant shall undertake serious and continuing discussions for the purpose of finding a method to save the property. The six-month period may be extended by mutual agreement of the applicant and the Commission. If the time period is not extended, the Commission s denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness shall become final unless a formal application for funds from any governmental unit or nonprofit to preserve the property is pending. The Commission s denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness may be appealed to the Common Council within 60 days of a final denial under Subsection N. If a mutually agreeable method of saving the property or an application for funds is apparent after the six-month period, but is then unsuccessful within a period of sixty (60) days following the end of the required time period, the Commission s denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness stands and the applicant may appeal to the Council under Subsection N. (3) In determining whether to issue a certificate of appropriateness for any demolition, the Commission shall consider the following:

59 (a) Whether the building or structure is of such an architectural or historic significance that its demolition would be detrimental to the public interest and contrary to the general welfare of the people of the City of Monona and the State. (b) Whether the demolition of the subject property would be contrary to the purpose and intent of this chapter. (c) Whether the building or structure is of such old and unusual or uncommon design, texture and / or material that it could not be reproduced or reproduced only with great difficulty and / or expense. (d) Whether the retention of the building or structure would promote the general welfare of the people of the City of Monona and the State by encouraging study of American history, architecture, and design or by developing an understanding of American culture and heritage. (e) Whether the building or structure is in such deteriorated condition that it is not structurally or economically feasible to preserve or restore it, provided that any hardship claimed by the owner is not self-created, or is a result of failure to maintain the property in good repair. M. Certificate of Appropriateness. If the Commission determines that the application for a certificate of appropriateness and the proposed changes are consistent with the character and features of the property or district, and considering the matters referred to in Subsection K, it shall issue the certificate of appropriateness. The Commission shall make this decision within 45 days of filing of the application. The issuance of a certificate of appropriateness shall not relieve the applicant from obtaining other permits and approvals required by the city. If the Commission fails to issue a certificate of appropriateness, the Commission shall, at the request of the applicant, cooperate and work with the applicant in an attempt to obtain a certificate of appropriateness within the guidelines of this chapter. N. Appeals. Should the Commission fail to issue a certificate of appropriateness due to the failure of the proposal to conform to the guidelines, the applicant may appeal such decision to the Common Council in accordance with Chapter 68 of the Wisconsin Statutes by filing a written notice with the City Clerk within 30 days after expiration of the applicable period set forth in Subsections L and M above. O. Sale of historic structures and historic sites. Any person who is listed as the owner of record of an historic structure at the time of its designation, who can demonstrate to the Commission that by virtue of such designation, he or she is unable to find a buyer willing to pay fair market value and to preserve such structure or site, even though he or she has made reasonable attempts in good faith to find and attract such a buyer, may petition the Commission for a rescission of its designation. In the event of such rescission, the Commission shall notify the Building Inspector as well as the owner of record of the site, and shall cause the rescission to be recorded with the Dane County Register of Deeds at the city s expense. P. Conditions dangerous to life, health, or property. Nothing contained in this chapter shall prohibit the construction, reconstruction, alteration or demolition of any historic structure pursuant to the order of any appropriate City or State governmental official, or any court order having jurisdiction, for the purpose of remedying conditions determined to be dangerous to life, health, or property. In such cases, no approval from the Commission shall be required. Q. Duty to maintain in good repair. Every person in charge of a historic structure or historic site shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement and all interior portions thereof, which, if not so maintained, may cause or tend to cause the exterior portions of such improvement to fall into a state of disrepair. This provision shall be in addition to all other provisions of law requiring such improvement to be kept in good repair.

60 R. Variances. (1) General. A property owner who applies for a certificate of appropriateness may request a variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance from the standards in Subsection K for any of the following reasons: (a) Economic hardship under sub. (4) below. (b) Historic design under sub. (5) below. (c) Alternative design under sub. (6) below. (d) Projects which are necessary for the public interest under sub. (7) below. (2) Variance request. A property owner shall make a variance request to the Landmarks Commission. The request shall include: (a) The name and address of the property owner. (b) The location of the property to which the request pertains. (c) The certificate of appropriateness application to which the variance request pertains. (d) The type of variance requested under sub. (1). (e) The specific variance requested. (f) The circumstances and supporting evidence that justify the requested variance. (g) Any other materials requested by the City Planner or Landmarks Commission. (3) Hearing, decision, and appeal. (a) The Landmarks Commission shall hold a public hearing on each variance request. The Commission shall give notice of the hearing as provided in Subsection E. The Commission may combine the hearing with a hearing on the proposed certificate of appropriateness to which the variance request pertains, provided that the hearing notice identifies both items. (b) After it holds a public hearing on a variance request, the Commission shall grant or deny the request. (c) The Commission s decision may be appealed to the Common Council as provided under Subsection M. (4) Economic hardship variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance if all of the following apply: (a) Strict literal application of the standards in Subsection K would deny the property owner a reasonable rate of return on investment or would impose upon the property owner an unreasonable and unnecessary financial hardship. (b) The circumstances justifying the variance are unique to the property in question, and: 1. Are not caused by the owner s failure to maintain the property as required by this chapter; and 2. Does not apply to a substantial portion of the historic district or historic resources within 200 feet of the subject property; and

61 3. Will not alter the historic character of the historic district or historic resources within 200 feet of the subject property. (c) The property owner documents the circumstances justifying the variance. Required documentation should include: 1. Property purchase costs; 2. Rental income; 3. Real estate listings, disclosure statements, asking prices, and purchase offers; 4. Tax assessments and real estate listings for comparable properties; 5. Improvements made and improvement costs incurred during ownership; 6. Routine maintenance costs incurred during ownership; 7. Costs to comply with the standard from which a variance is requested; 8. Other documentation as reasonable requested by the Landmarks Commission. (5) Historic design variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance allowing, as part of the alteration of an existing structure, elements otherwise prohibited under Subsection K if all of the following apply: (a) The property owner provides photographic or other evidence to show that other local structures of similar age and style incorporated similar elements as part of the original design. (b) The proposed alteration complies with all other applicable standards under Subsection K. (c) The alteration will not destroy significant architectural features on the building. (6) Alternative design variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance allowing, in a new or altered structure, elements that are otherwise prohibited under Subsection K if all of the following apply: (a) The elements will enhance the quality of the design. (b) The design complies with all other applicable standards under Subsection K. (c) The design does not allow material deviations from historic district standards and guidelines in the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation that would undermine the character or purpose of the historic district. (d) The design will have a beneficial effect on the historic character of the area within 200 feet of the subject property. (7) Public interest variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance allowing the construction of a new structure, or the alteration, demolition, or removal of an existing structure, which would otherwise be prohibited under Subsection K, if the Commission finds that a variance is necessary in the public interest. A variance is necessary in the public interest if the Commission finds all of the following: (a) The proposed building, object, site or structure provides unique, high priority benefits to the general public.

62 (b) The benefits to the general public substantially outweigh the strong public interest in preserving historic resources expressed in this chapter. (c) There are no reasonable alternatives to granting a variance that would allow the proposed project to occur in the city and satisfy the standards of this chapter. S. Penalties for failure to obtain a certificate of appropriateness. (1) General penalty. Any person who, without obtaining a certificate of appropriateness, performs acts requiring a certificate of appropriateness or who violates the terms of the certificate of appropriateness shall be subject to the forfeiture set forth in the forfeiture schedule. (2) Permits. The Building Inspector shall not issue a permit allowing alteration, construction, demolition, removal, or for any other action for which a certificate of appropriateness is required unless the certificate has been approved by the Commission and issued by the City Planner. (3) Prohibition. No owner, operation, or person in charge of a landmark structure, landmark site, or contributing resource within an historic district shall cause or permit any painting of signs, alteration, construction, demolition, or removal for which a certificate of appropriateness is required unless a certificate has been approved by the Commission. (4) Penalty for work done without Certificate of Appropriateness. In addition to any other penalty provided in this chapter, the Landmarks Commission may order the removal or modification of any alteration, construction or other work that was performed without a required certificate, or that was not performance in compliance with the conditions of an issued certificate, when such work does not meet the applicable standards for a certificate under Subsection K. Alternatively, the Commission may order renovation to make such work comply with those standards.

63 The following Code does not display images or complicated formatting. Codes should be viewed online. This tool is only meant for editing Historic conservation preservation. [Amended by Ord. No ] A. Purpose and intent. The protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of improvements of special character or special historical interest or value are in the public interest. The purpose of historic conservation is to: (1) Protect, enhance and perpetuate improvements and districts which represent or reflect elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political and architectural history; (2) Safeguard the City's historic and cultural heritage, as embodied and reflected in such landmarks and historic districts; (3) Stabilize and improve property values; (4) Foster civic pride in the beauty and noble accomplishments of the past; (5) Protect and enhance the City's attractions to residents, tourist and visitors, and serve as a support and stimulus to business and industry; (6) Strengthen the economy of the City; and (7) Promote the use of historic districts and landmarks for the education, pleasure and welfare of the people of the City. B. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: LANDMARK STRUCTURE Any improvement which has a special character or special historic interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, state or nation, and which has been designated as a landmark pursuant to the provisions of this chapter LANDMARK SITE Any parcel of land of historic significance due to a substantial value in tracing the history of aboriginal people or upon which an historic event has occurred, and which has been designated as a landmark site under this chapter, or a parcel or part thereof on which is situated a landmark. HISTORIC DISTRICT Any area designated pursuant to the provisions of this chapter that contains two or more historic improvements or sites as well as those abutting improvement parcels which the Commission determines should fall under the provisions of this section to assure that their appearance and development is harmonious with such landmarks or landmark sites. CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES Contributing resources are the buildings, objects, sites and structures that played a role or, more simply, existed at the time the event associated with the proposed historic landmark occurred. The resources status as contributing shall be identified on the official landmark designation. NONCONTRIBUTING RESOURCES 1

64 Noncontributing resources are the buildings, objects, sties, and structures that did not exist at the time the event(s) associated with the proposed historic landmark occurred or have lost integrity from that historic period. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The certificate issued which approves alteration, rehabilitation, construction, reconstruction or razing of a historic structure or site or any improvement in a historic district. C. Designation. The Common Council, after considering the recommendation of the Landmarks Commission under Subsection G below, may designate a landmark according to this section. DC. Historic structure, site, and district designation criteria. Landmarks and landmark sites designation criteria. For the purposes of this chapter, a historic structure, site, or district designation may be placed on any site, natural or improved, including any building, improvement or structure located thereon, or any area of particular historic, architectural, or cultural significance to the city, which: The Landmarks Commission may designate as a landmark or landmark site any site, natural or improved, including any building, improvement or structure located thereon, or any area of particular historical, architectural or cultural significance to the City, such as historic structures or sites, which: (1) Exemplify or reflect the broad cultural, political, economic or social history of the nation, state or community; or (2) Are associated with the lives of important persons or with important events in national, state or local history; or (3) Embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type inherently valuable for a study of a period, style, method of construction or of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or (4) Are representative of the notable work of a master builder, designer or architect; or (5) Exhibit important archaeological or anthropological significance. ED. Nomination. Any person, or the Landmarks Commission, may nominate a building or structure, site, improvement or site with improvements or historic district for designation as a landmark. The person or Commission shall submit the nomination to the City Planning Division, to the attention of the City Planner, on a nomination form approved by the Landmarks Commission. The nomination shall clearly identify the proposed landmark structure, landmark site, or historic district and document why it qualifies under Subsection DC. The City Planner may ask the person or Commission to submit additional information and documentation as needed to complete or clarify the nomination. When the City Planner determines that the nomination is complete, the City Planner shall refer the nomination to the Landmarks Commission. Any property nominated for landmark status located within a redevelopment area or tax increment financing district shall also be referred to the Community Development Authority for review and recommendation prior to Common Council action. FE. Landmarks Commission review and public hearing of nomination. Whenever the Landmarks Commission receives a complete, accurate nomination under Subsection ED, the Commission shall review the nomination. As part of its review, the Commission shall hold a public hearing on the nomination, preceded by a Class 2 I notice and notice to the notice to each owner of record of the proposed landmark, on each lot on which the proposed landmark is located and to each the owner of record of each lot located within 200 feet of the lot on which the proposed landmark is located. If any person or persons other than the owner of record files the nomination, the owner of record shall be notified of the nomination via certified mail no later than ten days prior to the public hearing.the 2

65 Commission may also conduct its own investigation of the facts, as it deems necessary. GF. Landmarks actiondesignation. After the Landmarks Commission holds a public hearing and completes its review under Subsection FE, the Commission shall file a report recommending approval, disapproval, or approval subject to conditions. Final approval of the designation shall be granted by the Common Council. Once designated, such historic structures, sites, and districts shall be subject to all provisions of this chapter. report to the Common Council a recommendation supporting or opposing the proposed landmark designation. The Commission shall send notice of the recommendation to each owner of record on each lot on which the proposed landmark is located and to each owner of record of each lot located within 200 feet of any lot on which the site or structure is located at least 10 days before any meeting at which the Common Council may act on the Commission's recommendation. H.G. Notification and recording of designation. The City Clerk shall promptly notify the Building Inspector of each landmark designation, as well as the owner of record of the site. The City Clerk shall record the designation with the Dane County Register of Deeds at the City s expense. Common Council action. After considering the Landmark Commission's report recommendation under Subsection G, and based on the standards under Subsection D, the Common Council shall vote to designate or decline to designate the property as a landmark. The City Clerk shall promptly notify the Building Inspector of each landmark designation. The City Clerk shall record the designation with the Dane County Register of Deeds at the City's expense. IH. Voluntary supplemental restrictions. The Common Council may at any time supplement the terms of a landmark designation, pursuant to an agreement between the landmark owner and the Landmarks Commission, to enhance the preservation and protection of the landmark JI. Recognition of landmarks. Whenever the Common Council designates a landmark under Subsection HF, the Landmarks Commission shall may affix a plaque identifying the property as a landmark to the landmark or landmark site with the permission of the owner or, in the absence of permission, in the public right-of-way as approved by the Public Works Director. The plaque shall be placed so that it is easily visible to passing pedestrians. In the case of a landmark structure, the plaque or sign shall include the accepted name of the landmark, the date of its construction, and other information that the Landmarks Commission considers appropriate. In the case of a landmark that is not a structure, the plaque or sign shall include the common name of the landmark and other information that the Commission considers appropriate. If the Commission determines that, because the landmark is ecologically or culturally sensitive, a plaque or sign would be inappropriate, no plaque or sign is required. No person may remove or modify a plaque without approval of the City Planner KJ. Amending or rescinding a landmark designation. Any person may petition the Landmarks Commission to amend or rescind a Landmark Designation. The process for amending a landmark shall be the same as for designating a landmark under Subsections E D through H G above. LK. Determination of effect on proposed use or improvementregulation of construction, reconstruction or alterations. If an application for a zoning or building permit for exterior work, building or demolition permit under this chapter involves a landmark structure, landmark site, or a contributing resource within a historic district, the permit shall first be referred to the Landmarks Commission for consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness. No permit may be issued until the Commission has issued a Certificate of Appropriateness under Subsection N. In cases where a building permit is not required, ordinary maintenance and repairs may be undertaken without a certificate of appropriateness provided that the work involves repairs to existing features of a historic structure or site or the replacement of elements of a structure with pieces and materials identical in appearance and provided that the work does not change the exterior appearance of the structure or site. This consideration shall be based on the considerations below, and the United States Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation, 36 CFR 67.or landmark site designated as such, the 3

66 Landmarks Commission shall determine: (1) Whether the proposed work would detrimentally change, destroy or adversely affect any architectural feature of the landmark; and (2) In the case of a new construction, whether the exterior of such construction would be in harmony with the external appearance of other landmarks on the site; and (3) Whether the proposal would significantly alter or destroy the historic characteristics of the landmark or the landmark site. M. Action on permit application. The permit application shall be first referred to the Landmarks Commission for consideration. The Landmarks Commission shall make a determination as to the matters referred to in Subsection L and shall forward its determination to the appropriate body for action in accordance with (zoning permits in single-family and two-family residence districts), (zoning permits in all other districts), (building permits), and ) (demolition permits). Notwithstanding the previous sentence, upon the recommendation of the Landmarks Commission and after consideration of the purpose and intent of this section, the Landmarks Commission shall refer the application with an advisory report to the Common Council for consideration of acquisition or preservation of the landmark or landmark site. The City Planner shall provide notice to the State Historic Preservation Officer of any proposed action which would affect a designated landmark in accordance with , Wis. Stats. L. Regulation of demolition. No permit to demolish all or part of an historic structure or contributing resource in an historic district, shall be granted by the Building Inspector except as follows: (1) No person in charge of an historic structure shall be granted a permit to demolish such property under any circumstances without first receiving the written approval of the Commission. (2) At the time a person applies for a permit to demolish such property, an application shall be forwarded to the Commission. The Commission may refuse to grant written approval of a period of up to six months from the time of the application, during which time the Commission and the applicant shall undertake serious and continuing discussions for the purpose of finding a method to save the property. The six-month period may be extended by mutal agreement of the applicant and the Commission. If the time period is not extended, the Commission s denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness shall become final unless a formal application for funds from any governmental unit or nonprofit to preserve the property is pending. The Commission s denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness may be appealed to the Common Council within 60 days of a final denial under Subsection N. If a mutually agreeable method of saving the property or an application for funds is apparent after the six-month period, but is then unsuccessful within a period of sixty (60) days following the end of the required time period, the Commission s denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness stands and the applicant may appeal to the Council under Subsection N. (3) In determining whether to issue a certificate of appropriateness for any demolition, the Commission shall consider the following: (a) Whether the building or structure is of such an architectural or historic significance that its demolition would be detrimental to the public interest and contrary to the general welfare of the people of the City of Monona and the State. (b) Whether the demolition of the subject property would be contrary to the purpose and intent of this chapter. (c) Whether the building or structure is of such old and unusual or uncommon design, texture and / 4

67 or material that it could not be reproduced or reproduced only with great difficulty and / or expense. (d) Whether the retention of the building or structure would promote the general welfare of the people of the City of Monona and the State by encouraging study of American history, architecture, and design or by developing an understanding of American culture and heritage. (e) Whether the building or structure is in such deteriorated condition that it is not structurally or economically feasible to preserve or restore it, provided that any hardship claimed by the owner is not self-created, or is a result of failure to maintain the property in good repair. M. Certificate of Appropriateness. If the Commission determines that the application for a certificate of appropriateness and the proposed changes are consistent with the character and features of the property or district, and considering the matters referred to in Subsection K, it shall issue the certificate of appropriateness. The Commission shall make this decision within 45 days of filing of the application. The issuance of a certificate of appropriateness shall not relieve the applicant from obtaining other permits and approvals required by the city. If the Commission fails to issue a certificate of appropriateness, the Commission shall, at the request of the applicant, cooperate and work with the applicant in an attempt to obtain a certificate of appropriateness within the guidelines of this chapter. N. Appeals. Should the Commission fail to issue a certificate of appropriateness due to the failure of the proposal to conform to the guidelines, the applicant may appeal such decision to the Common Council in accordance with Chapter 68 of the Wisconsin Statutes by filing a written notice with the City Clerk within 30 days after expiration of the applicable period set forth in Subsections L and M above. O. Sale of historic structures and historic sites. Any person who is listed as the owner of record of an historic structure at the time of its designation, who can demonstrate to the Commission that by virtue of such designation, he or she is unable to find a buyer willing to pay fair market value and to preserve such structure or site, even though he or she has made reasonable attempts in good faith to find and attract such a buyer, may petition the Commission for a rescission of its designation. In the event of such rescission, the Commission shall notify the Building Inspector as well as the owner of record of the site, and shall cause the rescission to be recorded with the Dane County Register of Deeds at the City s expense. P. Conditions dangerous to life, health, or property. Nothing contained in this chapter shall prohibit the construction, reconstruction, alteration or demolition of any historic structure pursuant to the order of any appropriate City or State governmental official, or any court order having jurisdiction, for the purpose of remedying conditions determined to be dangerous to life, health, or property. In such cases, no approval from the Commission shall be required. Q. Duty to maintain in good repair. Every person in charge of a historic structure or historic site shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement and all interior portions thereof, which, if not so maintained, may cause or tend to cause the exterior portions of such improvement to fall into a state of disrepair. This provision shall be in addition to all other provisions of law requiring such improvement to be kept in good repair. R. Variances. (1) General. A property owner who applies for a certificate of appropriateness may request a variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance from the standards in Subsection K for any of the following reasons: 5

68 (a) Economic hardship under sub. (4) below. (b) Historic design under sub. (5) below. (c) Alternative design under sub. (6) below. (d) Projects which are necessary for the public interest under sub. (7) below. (2) Variance request. A property owner shall make a variance request to the Landmarks Commission. The request shall include: (a) The name and address of the property owner. (b) The location of the property to which the request pertains. (c) The certificate of appropriateness application to which the variance request pertains. (d) The type of variance requested under sub. (1). (e) The specific variance requested. (f) The circumstances and supporting evidence that justify the requested variance. (g) Any other materials requested by the City Planner or Landmarks Commission. (3) Hearing, decision, and appeal. (a) The landmarks Commission shall hold a public hearing on each variance request. The Commission shall give notice of the hearing as provided in Subsection E. The Commission may combine the hearing with a hearing on the proposed certificate of appropriateness to which the variance request pertains, provided that the hearing notice identifies both items. (b) After it holds a public hearing on a variance request, the Commission shall grant or deny the request. (c) The Commission s decision may be appealed to the Common Council as provided under Subsection M. (4) Economic hardship variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance if all of the following apply: (a) Strict literal application of the standards in Subsection K would deny the property owner a reasonable rate of return on investment or would impose upon the property owner an unreasonable and unnecessary financial hardship. (b) The circumstances justifying the variance are unique to the property in question, and: 1. Are not caused by the owner s failure to maintain the property as required by this chapter; and 2. Does not apply to a substantial portion of the historic district or historic resources within 200 feet of the subject property; and 3. Will not alter the historic character of the historic district or historic resources within 200 feet of the subject property. (c) The property owner documents the circumstances justifying the variance. Required documentation should include: 1. Property purchase costs; 2. Rental income; 3. Real estate listings, disclosure statements, asking prices, and purchase offers; 6

69 Tax assessments and real estate listings for comparable properties; 5. Improvements made and improvement costs incurred during ownership; 6. Routine maintenance costs incurred during ownership; 7. Costs to comply with the standard from which a variance is requested; 8. Other documentation as reasonable requested by the Landmarks Commission. (5) Historic design variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance allowing, as part of the alteration of an existing structure, elements otherwise prohibited under Subsection K if all of the following apply: (a) The property owner provides photographic or other evidence to show that other local structures of similar age and style incorporated similar elements as part of the original design. (b) The proposed alteration complies with all other applicable standards under Subsection K. (c) The alteration will not destroy significant architectural features on the building. (6) Alternative design variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance allowing, in a new or altered structure, elements that are otherwise prohibited under Subsection K if all of the following apply: (a) The elements will enhance the quality of the design. (b) The design complies with all other applicable standards under Subsection K. (c) The design does not allow material deviations from historic district standards and guidelines in the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation that would undermine the character or purpose of the historic district. (d) The design will have a beneficial effect on the historic character of the area within 200 feet of the subject property. (7) Public interest variance. The Landmarks Commission may grant a variance allowing the construction of a new structure, or the alteration, demolition, or removal of an existing structure, which would otherwise be prohibited under Subsection K, if the Commission finds that a variance is necessary in the public interest. A variance is necessary in the public interest if the Commission finds all of the following: (a) The proposed building, object, site or structure provides unique, high priority benefits to the general public. (b) The benefits to the general public substantially outweigh the strong public interest in preserving historic resources expressed in this chapter. (c) There are no reasonable alternatives to granting a variance that would allow the proposed project to occur in the city and satisfy the standards of this chapter. S. Penalties for failure to obtain a certificate of appropriateness. (1) General penalty. Any person who, without obtaining a Certificate of Appropriateness, performs acts requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness or who violates the terms of the Certificate of Appropriateness shall be subject to the forfeiture set forth in the forfeiture schedule. (2) Permits. The Building Inspector shall not issue a permit allowing alteration, construction, demolition, removal, or for any other action for which a Certificate of Appropriateness is required 7

70 unless the certificate has been approved by the Commission and issued by the City Planner. (3) Prohibition. No owner, operation, or person in charge of a landmark structure, landmark site, or contributing resource within an historic district shall cause or permit any painting of signs, alteration, construction, demolition, or removal for which a Certificate of Appropriateness is required unless a Certificate has been approved by the Commission. (4) Penalty for work done without Certificate of Appropriateness. In addition to any other penalty provided in this chapter, the Landmarks Commission may order the removal or modification of any alteration, construction or other work that was performed without a required Certificate, or that was not performance in compliance with the conditions of an issued Certificate, when such work does not meet the applicable standards for a Certificate under Subsection K. Alternatively, the Commission may order renovation to make such work comply with those standards. 8

71

72

73 Ordinance No Monona Common Council AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY NO PARKING ON WINNEQUAH ROAD WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Monona to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, on Winnequah Road, from Bridge Road to Owen Road, the travel lanes, bike lanes, and parking lane are considered to be too narrow to safely accommodate the various types of traffic this section of road often sees; and, WHEREAS, when residential and contractor vehicles are parked in the southbound parking lane, those vehicles often encroach on the bike lane which forces foot traffic and bike traffic out into the vehicle travel lanes of the road, making it unsafe for all; and, WHEREAS, to improve safety for all types of traffic within this area of Winnequah Road, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee has recommended Temporary No Parking be established along the southbound lane of Winnequah Road, from Owen Road to Bridge Road, from date of publication of this ordinance until September 30, 2018; and, WHEREAS, with this approval, and with continued interest to protect public safety, the Mayor is authorized to extend the Temporary No Parking within the identified area beyond the date of September 30, 2018, for a time frame as determined by the Mayor; and, WHEREAS, parking restrictions would be enforced under Code of the City of Monona, Chapter 434, Article III Parking Regulations; and, WHEREAS, based upon the recommendations of city staff, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee, and the Public Works Committee, the Common Council finds it in the public interest to establish parking restrictions at the location stated below. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Monona, Dane County, Wisconsin, do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Temporary No Parking be established along the southbound lane of Winnequah Road, from Owen Road to Bridge Road, from date of publication of this ordinance until September 30, 2018, and with the continued interest in public safety, the Mayor is authorized to extend the timeframe beyond September 30, 2018, for a timeframe as determined by the Mayor. SECTION 2. City staff is directed to take all action necessary to implement this ordinance, including the installation of appropriate signage consistent with practices specified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication as provided by law. Adopted this day of, 2018.

74 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MONONA, WISCONSIN Mary K. O Connor Mayor ATTEST: Joan Andrusz City Clerk Drafted By: Dan Stephany, Public Works Director 4/26/18 Approval Recommended By: Pedestrian and Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee 5/23/18; Public Works Committee 6/6/18 Council Action: Date Introduced: Date Approved: Date Disapproved:

75 Ordinance No Monona Common Council AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER ON OWEN ROAD WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Monona to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, a pedestrian and bicycle safety concern exists for this type of traffic on Winnequah Road exiting eastbound to Owen Road; and, WHEREAS, pedestrian and bicycle traffic currently use the bump-out on Winnequah Road at Owen Road to travel eastbound on Owen Road and, at times, encounter parked vehicles immediately past the bump-out; and, WHEREAS, to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety at this location, at the recommendation of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee, staff is requesting No Parking Here To Corner be established for a distance of twenty (20) feet from the end of the bump-out; and, WHEREAS, parking restrictions would be enforced under the Code of the City of Monona, Chapter 434, Article III Parking Regulations; and, WHEREAS, based upon the recommendations of city staff, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee, and the Public Works Committee, the Common Council finds it in the public interest to establish parking restrictions at the location stated below. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Monona, Dane County, Wisconsin, do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Street parking is hereby restricted for a distance of twenty (20) feet from the end of the bump-out on Owen Road at Winnequah Road, with signs stating No Parking Here To Corner. SECTION 2. City staff is directed to take all action necessary to implement this ordinance, including the installation of appropriate signage consistent with practices specified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication as provided by law. Adopted this day of, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MONONA, WISCONSIN Mary K. O Connor Mayor ATTEST: Joan Andrusz City Clerk Approval Recommended By: Pedestrian and Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee 5/23/18; Public Works Committee 6/6/18 Drafted By: Dan Stephany, Public Works Director 5/30/18

76 DEPARTMENT: City Administrator April Little MONTH OF: May 2018 Major Projects / Issues Budget 2019 o Capital following are the next few steps in the process: Department heads prepare 5- year capital project plan: obtain committee approval. Prepare 5-year plan (based on approved committee budgets) July 31 August 1-15 Should go to the Committees twice - June and July meetings. Finance Director prepares the budget and plan based on approved committee recommendations o Operating: Staff budget process planning meeting is June 13. Long-Term Facilities Planning - The advisory committee met May 3 with Bray Architects and toured Community / Senior Center. We are also working to put together a method to create an interim facilities list to address current and near-future facilities upgrades and maintenance needs that can t wait until (if) new facilities are built. The next full committee meeting is June 21. Jeff Belongia (Hutchinson, Shockey and Erley) and Marc H. are invited to attend to explain facility financing options and capital debt scenarios. Bike/Pedestrian/Transportation/Winnequah Road Studies The Ad Hoc Committee hosted a very well-attended public information workshop on May 8 at Winnequah School. We have continued pushing to receive more public comments after the meeting, with a special effort to reach seniors and parents. Our Strand consultant, Tom Lynch, is accepting a new position at the City of Madison, so the work group will meet to plan the next phase of the project. A proposal for Winnequah Road temporary parking restrictions is on the June 4 City Council agenda. Riverfront The Riverfront Park Plaza Ad Hoc Committee will meet again June 5 to recommend final amenities and materials for the project, to tie in with those needed for the interior roads. A separate work group will explore options for art concepts, artists, and ideas for the Riverfront project s public art (sculpture, fence panel, and potential public art). Communications Needs Assessment Consultant Maggie Baum met with staff May 31 to present initial study findings. They will be expanded into an initial report, the rough draft of which we will receive mid-june. Tourism Commission Kristie Schilling (MESBA) arranged a Monona Tourism Task Force Committee meeting May 15. MESBA is our designated tourism agent. Nancy Moore and I attended. Andrew Nussbaum, Wis. Department of Tourism Regional Specialist, gave an overview of the power of tourism and tourism data. The group is launching a tourism inventory assessment process to gather data about visits to Monona, which will be conducted by committee members. The group will meet monthly over the summer. I will keep up on how best to help coordinate from the City s end. F:\Council\Department Head Report May 2018.docx 1 of 2

77 Stormwater Drain Mural - Madison Area Stormwater Partnership / Dane Arts Mural Arts (DAMA) / MG21 charter school completed its educational storm drain mural initiative, located along Winnequah Park across from the library (right). Meetings / Training Attended May 2018 Edger May 9 Clean Lakes Alliance May 2 (hosted table) Budget staff meetings (with Mayor, Finance Director) Staff had fun with Bucky: Upcoming Meetings / Training June 2018 June 5 - Riverfront Parks Plaza Ad Hoc Committee June 21 - Long-Range Facilities Advisory Committee June 27 - Ad Hoc Pedestrian & Bicycle Committee June Attending WCMA Conference F:\Council\Department Head Report May 2018.docx 2 of 2

78 MONONA POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT April 2018

79 Police Department Monthly Activity Summary April 2018 Arrests Arrests by Month 12 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Total Arrests Calls for Service 0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Type of Calls by Month Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Officer Initiated Citizen Gen Unknown Total 1,099 1,073 1,347 1,127 1,197 1,330 0 Calls Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Top 10 Natures Feb Mar Apr Check Area/Foot Patrol Follow Up Traffic Stop Traffic Arrest Information (Law) Check Person Directed Patrol Aa-Assist Ambulance Street Parking Traffic Complaint Calls Check Area/Foot Patrol Follow Up Traffic Stop Traffic Arrest Information (Law) Check Person Apr Mar Feb Directed Patrol Aa-Assist Ambulance Street Parking Traffic Complaint Citations Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr County Ordinance Parking Traffic Warning Citations Citations by Month Total Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Crash Reports Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Angle Head On No Collision With Motor Transp Rear End Sideswipe, Opposite Direction Sideswipe, Same Direction Unknown Accidents Accidents by Month Total Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

80 Calls for Service by Shift for Apr of Total 911 Abandoned Disconnect Misdial Open Line Test Unintentional/Callercontct Aa-Assist Ambulance Ac-Assist Citizen Accident-Hit/Run Accident-Injury Accident-No Injury Accident-Private Property Accident-Unknown Injury Afd-Assist Fire Department Alarm Alcohol Compliance Check Animal-Barking Animal-Disturbance Animal-Found Animal-General/Stray Animal-Lost Aoa-Assist Other Agency Aoak9-Assist Other Agency-K Arrested Adult Assist-Community Policing Atl-Person Check Area/Foot Patrol Check Person Check Property Civil Dispute Conveyance Damage To Property Death Investigation Directed Patrol Disabled Vehicle Disturbance Domestic/Family Trouble Drug Investigation Follow Up Found Property Fraud Harassment Information (Law) Intoxicated Driver Intoxicated Person Juvenile Complaint Liquor Law Violation Liquor Law-Bar Check Lost Property Meeting Missing Juvenile Neighbor Trouble On Duty Training Ordinance Violation Phone Message (Law) Private Parking Repossessed Vehicle Info Robbery-Armed Safety Hazard Special Event Street Parking Suspicious Person Suspicious Vehicle

81 1 2 3 Total Theft Theft-Auto Theft-From Auto Theft-Retail Threats Traffic Arrest Traffic Complaint Traffic Incident-Past Traffic Incident-Road Rage Traffic Stop Unwanted Person Weapons Violation Worthless Checks Total ,330

82 OPERATIONS DIVISION In April of 2018, the Operations Division handled 30 vehicle crashes and issued 122 traffic warnings, 223 traffic citations, and 37 parking tickets. Our calls total for April was 1,330 calls for service. Training Lt Wiegel attended a 1-day CVMIC class on Risk Management & Safety Administration Lt Deuman attended a 1-day CVMIC class on Risk Management & Safety Administration and a 1-day CVMIC class on Investigating Complaints of Harassment Speed Trailer The Speed Trailer had been put away for the winter season but is about to be set out. To request the speed trailer in your neighborhood contact Officer Jim Reiter at: jreiter@ci.monona.wi.us Security Checks Officers performed 222 security checks in the month of April. A security check is when an Officer goes into a business and walks around to meet with staff to discuss any problems that the businesses are aware of. This also serves as a deterrent for theft. For the overnight shift, this entails checking the perimeter of the business and pulling on doors to make sure the businesses are secure. Retail Thefts There were 24 retail theft cases in April, down quite a few from the 36 cases in March. Around 40 cases are typical in a month. These cases can be time consuming if the suspect flees and follow-up outside the City is necessary. Tellurian Treatment Center In April we had 11 calls to the Tellurian property totaling 22 hours of police time. Use of Force Incidents On April 16 th at 8:46 pm an Officer observed a speeding vehicle and locked his radar at 45 MPH in a 30 MPH zone. The driver pulled into a gas station and immediately fled on foot. The suspect jumped over a fence and ran into the backyards. Another Officer was in the area and located the male in a backyard. The Officer drew his Taser and ordered the male to get on the ground, and he complied and was arrested without further issue.

83 This subject was cited for Operating after Suspension ($124), Speeding ($98.80), and Operating without Insurance ($124) and was taken to jail on charges of Resisting Arrest, Possession of Marijuana, and 4 arrest warrants. The DA s Office decided fleeing on foot with 4 arrest warrants and some drugs was not worth prosecuting as a crime and simply pled the arrest charges out as a county forfeiture citation. (MO ) On April 20 th at 2:03 am Officers were dispatched to Wal-Mart for a retail theft. The suspect did not stop when told to by the Officer, and as he fled down the escalator he tripped and fell. The Officer then went to handcuff the male and he resisted by keeping his hands under his body. A second officer presented a Taser and the male then complied with being handcuffed. The male was issued a citation for Retail Theft and taken to jail for possession of Heroin, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, Resisting Arrest, and two warrants. (MO ) On April 26 th at 3:50 pm Officers were dispatched to Wal-Mart for a Retail Theft. A male stole $239 worth of food, alcohol and clothing and fled from the staff. The male refused to stop when the Officer arrived and the officer pursued the male on foot. The Officer caught the male by Goodwill and held him against the building but the male tried again to run away and the Officer decentralized him to the ground then secured the male into handcuffs. The male was taken to jail on a Probation hold and issued citations for Retail Theft ($313), Resisting Arrest ($313), and Trespass ($313). (MO ) There were no citizen complaints in April. Citizen Complaints 1 st Shift Monthly Report With the return of winter came an increase in automobile crashes. From April 13 th -16 th Monona handled 12 crash incidents. On April 9 th at 12:27 pm an Officer was dispatched to a one car accident on Broadway. There was a conflicting story to what occurred. A male and female were arguing in the parking lot, and as the couple left, their car crashed into a pole. The driver stated he was upset and went to pull forward but his foot got caught between the break and acceleator and he lunged forward towards moving traffic so he twisted his foot and ended up hiting the gas and he turned the wheel and ended up hiting the pole. The female stated she believed the male struck the pole intentionally to harm her. The male stated he would not intentially do that, as his 1 year old and 3 month old were in the back seat of the car. The report was forwarded to the DA s Office for review to see if they believe charges should be filed. (MO )

84 On April 13 th Officers were informed by Madison Police that there may be violence at a burial in Monona. The 45 year old deceased had children with two different males and a few days after her passing, one male shot at the other male in Madison. There was concern both might attend the funeral and burial and violence could occur. Officers stood by in the area in one marked and three unmarked squads for the hour people were present in the cemetary. Thankfully no disturbance of any kind occurred. Officer Overtime Analysis 2018 JAN Hrs FEB Hrs MAR Hrs APR Hrs TOTAL HRS To Date APPROX COST To Date TRAINING CONSORTIUM (In-Service) $2,951 TRAINING CONSORTIUM (Instructors for In-Service) $1,765 OTHER REQUIRED TRAINING (ECIR/Radar/CPR/K9) $0 OPTIONAL OFFICER TRAINING $0 SICK LEAVE Coverage $1,476 VACATION Coverage $5,217 FLOATING HOLIDAY Coverage $211 MILITARY LEAVE Coverage $0 COURT $2,543 LATE/EARLY CALL or SERIOUS INCIDENT $6,337 Special Event (Meeting, Parade, Festival, Drug Work) $2,490 Mental Health Case $2,464 Dispatch Coverage by an Officer $0 MG High School OT (Reimbursed) $1,476 TRAFFIC GRANT (Reimbursed) $8,274 TASK FORCE (Reimbursed) $0 TOTAL HRS Expense Per average $52.70 / HR $7,457 $7,615 $14,189 $5,942 $35,204 Lieutenant Curtis Wiegel is the Operations Commander and 1 st shift patrol supervisor. He can be reached at cwiegel@ci.monona.wi.us

85 2nd Shift Monthly Report Here is the second shift activity report for the month of April. Officers conducted 110 traffic stops, 11 Retail Thefts, 16 crashes, and 2 OWI. The following are some of the cases second shift handled this month. On April 9 th about 7:35pm Officers responded to the 300 block of Femrite Dr. for a disturbance. Officers made contact with a male subject who had threatened staff. The suspect threatened to punch staff. When staff stated that they were going to call police the suspect took the phone from staff and threw it. The suspect was yelling and clinching his fists. He was arrested and charged with Disorderly Conduct, Intimidation of a Victim and a Probation Hold was placed on him by the Department of Corrections. He was transported to the Dane County Jail. On April 16 th at about 8:45pm an Officer performed a traffic stop on Monona Dr. The vehicle pulled into the lot of Speedway Gas station. The driver exited the vehicle. The Officer ordered the suspect to get back into the vehicle. The suspect then fled on foot towards Walgreens. Additional Officers were requested and a foot chase ensued. The suspect jumped the fence behind Walgreens and was taken into custody on Admiral. The suspect had several warrants for his arrest and marijuana was discovered in the vehicle. The suspect was transported to the Dane County Jail. On April 18 th about 9:06pm Officers were dispatched to the 6200 block of Eastgate Rd for a disturbance. Upon their arrival the suspect had fled the scene. While investigating the disturbance a nearby resident called the police and stated someone had just run through their backyard. Officers responded to that area and located fresh footprints in the snow. They also located the suspects slippers. The Officers were able to track the suspect down. The suspect was apprehended. During a frisk of the suspect a hand gun, a fixed blade knife, and crack cocaine were located. The suspect, who was a convicted felon, was charged with felon in possession of a firearm, carrying a concealed weapon, possession of cocaine, and a probation hold. The suspect was taken to the Dane County Jail. Sergeant Jeremy Winge is the 2nd shift patrol supervisor and can be contacted at: jwinge@ci.monona.wi.us 3rd Shift Monthly Report The Monona Police Department third shift officers handled 1 Retail Theft, 4 Alarm calls, investigated 4 accidents and responded to several domestic disturbance calls during the month of April. Officers made 100 traffic stops resulting in 3 OWI arrests. On April 3 rd, 2018 at 1:38 a.m. officers responded to Wal-Mart for an intoxicated male. During the investigation it determined that the intoxicated male was homeless and had just been released from Detox earlier in the day. The male proceeded to go to Wal-Mart,

86 and become incapacitated from drinking more alcohol. Officers transported him back to Detox. On April 8 th, 2018 at 12:57 a.m. officers responded to a single vehicle crash on Monona Dr near HWY 12. Officers arrived and observed that a vehicle exited westbound HWY 12 at Monona Dr, lost control of the vehicle and struck the brick MONONA wall. The driver was arrested for OWI 1 st offense and refused the breath test. A P.B.T. showed the driver had a B.A.C. of.17 g/210l. On April 20 th, 2018 at 2:21 a.m. officers responded to Wal-Mart for a retail theft. When the suspect passed the last point of sale with merchandise concealed officers attempted contact with the suspect. The suspect fled down the escalators, falling at the bottom. Officers were able to arrest the suspect and recovered the $247 worth of merchandise. During a search of the suspect officers located.7 grams of Heroin and 3 needles. The suspect also had 2 active arrest warrants out for him. He was transported to the Dane Co Jail. On April 26 th, 2018 at 2:26 a.m. an officer attempted to stop a vehicle for speeding, 54 mph in a 30 mph zone on Monona Dr. The vehicle failed to stop and eluded police traveling in excess of 100 MPH on Broadway. Officers responded to the City of Madison to check the registered owners address, where it was later determined the vehicle had been stolen. After the pursuit had been terminated officers were advised the vehicle had struck a tree on the 4100 blk of Monona Dr. A K9 track was conducted where officers located the suspects cell phone in a backyard. The investigation is ongoing. Sergeant Adam Nachreiner is 3 rd shift patrol supervisor and can be contacted at anachreiner@ci.monona.wi.us Community Relations Monthly Report During the month of April, Community Resource Officer Reiter was involved in the following crime prevention and community relations activities: I conducted a coffee with a Cop at the Monona Senior Center. This is always a great way for the police department to interact with our senior population in an environment they