BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1 S. Main St., 9 th Floor Mount Clemens, Michigan FAX macombcountymi.gov/boardofcommissioners

Transcription

1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1 S. Main St., 9 th Floor Mount Clemens, Michigan FAX macombcountymi.gov/boardofcommissioners FINANCE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11, 2012 AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Adoption of Agenda, AS AMENDED, TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL APPOINTMENT OF LAW FIRM (#9), #9A AND #12A (RESOLUTION) AND #12B (PROCLAMATION) 4. Approval of Minutes dated February 22 and March 14, 2012 (previously distributed) 5. Public Participation (five minutes maximum per speaker, or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson related only to issues contained on the agenda) 6. Recommendations from Health & Human Services Committee Meeting: a) Approve Increase in Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures in (mailed) Health Grant Fund ($118,744) b) Approve Increase in Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures in (mailed) Health Grant Fund ($90,000) c) Approve Increase in Health Department Grant Fund 220 ($179,471.68) (mailed) d) Approve Increase in Senior Citizen Services General Fund Budget ($29,057.93) (mailed) 7. Fourth Quarter Financial Report for Martha T. Berry (mailed) 8. Approve 2012 Equalization Report (mailed and attached) 9. Appointments of Law Firms (3) (mailed and attached) MACOMB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Kathy D. Vosburg District 8 Chair Marvin E. Sauger District 2 Vice Chair Fred Miller District 9 Sergeant-At-Arms Toni Moceri District 1 Phillip A DiMaria- District 3 David Flynn - District 4 Ray Gralewski- District 5 James L. Carabelli - District 6 Don Brown- District 7 Roland Fraschetti- District 10 Kathy Tocco- District 11 Bob Smith- District 12 Joe Sabatini- District 13

2 FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 11, 2012 PAGE 2 9a. Recommendation from Justice & Public Safety Committee Meeting: a) Approve 2012 Budget Amendments for Community Corrections Dept. (attached) 10. Adoption of Compensation Ordinances: Correspondence from Corporation Counsel dated (mailed) a) Adopt Compensation Ordinance for Commissioners (mailed) b) Adopt Compensation Ordinance for Countywide Elected Officials (mailed) 11. Recommendation from Economic Development Committee Meeting: a) Millage for Detroit Institute of Arts (to be provided after meeting) 12. Adoption of Resolution: a) In Support of Requesting the Michigan Public Service Commission to (attached) Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of Smart Meters (offered by Carabelli) 13. Adoption of Proclamation: a) Commending the Clinton River Watershed Council 40 th Anniversary (attached) (offered by Moceri) 14. New Business 15. Public Participation 16. Adjournment MEMBERS: Brown-Chair, Miller-Vice-Chair, Carabelli, DiMaria, Flynn, Fraschetti, Gralewski, Moceri, Sabatini, Sauger, Smith, Tocco and Vosburg.

3 1 *(see below) Commissioner Toni Moceri, Chair, Health & Human Services Committee

4 2

5 3

6 4

7 5

8 6

9 7

10 8

11 9

12 10

13 11 RESOLUTION NO. _ MEETING DATE: _ AGENDA ITEM: _ MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: Approve an increase in budgeted revenues and expenditures in the Health Grant Fund in the amount of $90,000 to account for a grant award to the Health Department '(see below) Further, this budget action addresses budgetary issues only. It does not constitute the Commission's approval of any County contract. If a contract requires Commission approval under the County's Contracting Policy or the County's Procurement Ordinance, such approval must be sought separately. FORWARD TO THE FINANCE COMMITIEE. '(This language was added by Health & Human Services Committee Chair Moceri) INTRODUCED BY: Commissioner Toni Moceri, Chair, Health & Human Services Committee Background: The budget for the Health Grant Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012 was developed in June 2011 and approved by the Board of Commissioners in September The budget was developed with information known at that time. Since then, the County has received notification of an additional award from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Specifics of this grant award are as follows: Environmental Health: Increase of $90,000. The grant funds will be used to develop a digital beach model for Lake St. Clair Metropark beach (formerly Metro Beach) and Memorial Park beal:h in the City of St. Clair Shores. The model will aid in the identification and remediation of sources of bacterial pollution that contribute to beach closings and will help predict conditions that are conducive to elevated bacterial concentrations. Also, this grant will be used to conduct illicit discharge elimination activities in four storm drainage systems located near Memorial Park beach in St. Clair Shores. Supporting documentation is attached. COMMITIEE I MEETING DATE Health & Human Services [special meeting)

14 12 Date 02/13/2012 HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW GRANT PROGRAM GRANT PROGRAM NAME GlRI - BEACH MODELING AMOUNT $90,00000 SOURCE OF FUNDS DEQ H: rcsolutiorl

15 n This GLRI GRANT CONTRACT 8ETWEENTHE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND MACOMB COUNTY Gran! Contract rcontract"} is made between the Mich~an Department of Environmental Quality estate") and the Macomb County Health Department (~Granlee")_ The purpose of this Contract is 10 provide funding in exchange for work to be performed for the project named below. The State is authorized to provide grant assistance pursuanllo the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative This Contract is subject 10 the terms and C<Inditions specifj~ herein Project Name MACOMB COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BEACH Project n MODELING Amount of grant % of grant state QI % 0' grant federal 100 Amount of match: $0.00 = 0% PROJECT TOTAL- ~ (grant plus match) Start Date. October End Oale September 30, 2012 GRANTEE CONTACT: Mr. Steve Lichota, Associate Director NlIlmeITlt\e MAcof,Ie COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT tlmronflental HeALTH rvanuliltion STATE'S CONTACT: Dr, Shannon Briggs N.\IITla!Title DEO-WRD-SWAS Surlace Waler Assessmenl Section Divi'sionJBureawOffi=~c Elizabeth Road P.O. Box Addr.u Addn!l65 Mt. Clemens, MI lansing, MI AddlE!$l> A(jojf6S$ ( Telephol"lll Number Telephone Number Fax Number Fa)/. Number steve.lichola@macombcountymi,gov _briggss4@michigan,gov The individuals signing below certify by their signatures that they are authorized to sign this Grant Contract on behalf of their agencies, and tha( the parties will rulfill the terms of this Contract including any attached appendic s. as set forth herein. FOR THE GRANTEE; ~=~",, JJ~1t.<':'R,,==- ~ _ Sjgnat~ Dale /O<~($.- II NamelTitfe Mark Deldin. Deputy County Executive Macomb County FOR THE STATE: lallu.jw WIl..l.IIUoI Cl'lEAl., CHlcr WATEA RESOURces DNiSlON M1ctlIGM.. DEPAA.lMeNTOF EN\I'IRONoENTAl QUALITY JAN 27 lcl2 Macomb Counry 11~!!h IJepartmr.n1 EllVii Cll :;T'{;r; ~:~~ H.::l<.i:; : Ser',a::; BP rev

16 14 RESOLUTION NO. _ MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: Approve an increase in the Health Department Grant Fund 220 in the net amount of $179, by rolling available fund balances collected in previous years, as per attached documentation Further, this budget action addresses budgetary issues only. It does not constitute the Commission's approval of any County contract. If a contract requires Commission approval under the County's Contracting Policy or the County's Procurement Ordinance, such approval must be sought separately. FORWARD TO THE FINANCE COMMITIEE. (This language was added by Health & Human Services Committee Chair Moceri) INTRODUCED BY: Commissioner Toni Moceri, Chair, Health & Human Services Committee Background: The attachment lists six programs for which fund balances are being carried over from 2011 to These represent the difference between earlier projected amounts remaining the grants at the end of the year and the actual amount that remained at the end of Two of these need additional explanation, as follows: DEQ Support #4: The original funds in this grant were used to operate and maintain the Real Time Drinking Monitoring System. At the time the projection was made, the Health Department did not know about the funds that were ultimately contributed by Macomb and St. Clair Counties ($50,000 each, total $100,000) to fund the data management portion of the system for The carry-over includes those addition funds. Animal Shelter Act 287: The amount specified represents excess funds appropriated for refunding costs of spaying and neutering animals adopted from the Animal Shelter. Act 287 specifies that unused funds can only be utilized for spay/neuter activities and therefore the funds are being carried forward from 2011 to Supporting documentation is attached. For the six programs, the amount of the adjustment represents the difference between the final allocation once received and the projection or estimate of that allocation which was used in the original budget submission. COMMITIEE / MEETING DATE Health & Human Services (special meeting)

17 15 Dale 02/13t2012 ADJUSTMENTS TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENTS 2012 BEGINNING BALANCES NEEDED ORG AMOUNT OF SOURCE KEY GRANT PROGRAM NAMF ADJUSTMENT OF FUNDS RAPID WATER TESTING ($ ) OED GLRI - IDEP $16,25656 EPA GLRI - HHW $ EPA INLAND BEACH MONITORING ($400) OEQ B OEG SUPPORT #4 $745070B MACOMB & ST CLAIR CQUN 1Y CON rributrons ANlMI\l SHElTER - ACT 287 $62, SPAY/NEUTER NET EFFECT ON FUND 220 IN 2012 $179,471,68 increase AdrusIZ012 beginning budget balances to ending budgel balance al12/ H: resolution

18 16 RESOLUTION NO. MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: Approve an increase in Senior Citizen Services general fund budget for $29, in special needs funds which have been received throughout previous years through fundraising efforts, per attached document. The requested funds are currently in the fund balance. *(see below) *Further, this budget action addresses budgetary issues only. It does not constitute the Commission s approval of any County contract. If a contract requires Commission approval under the County s Contracting Policy or the County s Procurement Ordinance, such approval must be sought separately. FORWARD TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. INTRODUCED BY: Commissioner Toni Moceri, Chair, Health & Human Services Committee COMMITTEE / MEETING DATE Health & Human Services (special meeting)

19 SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES Dunham Road, Suite 6 Clinton Township, Michigan Phone: (586) Fax: (586) Rhonda M. Powell Director 17 MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Deldin, Deputy pc: Steve Gold, Director Macomb County Executive Dept. of H&CS FROM: Rhonda M. Powell, Director Senior Citizen Services DATE: February 13, 2012 RE: 2012 Budget Amendment The Department of Senior Citizen Services is requesting an increase in the general fund budget of $29, for Special Needs funds raised throughout previous years. The funds requested were generated by hosting various departmental fundraisers such as rummage sales, jewelry sales, etc. Historically the special needs fund has served to offset program expenses which would otherwise prevent certain community events/outreaches or place an undue burden on seniors. It is with the intent of continuing to offer programs at no cost to aging populations while increasing our reach into communities that the special needs fund was established. Execution of this request will ensure continuation of the 2012 calendar of events, programs and services which benefit Macomb County seniors. Thank you for your attention to this matter and please contact me at if additional information is needed. /rmp

20 18 RESOLUTION NO. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO INTRODUCED BY: receive and file the Fourth Quarter Financial Report for Martha T. Berry Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE Finance

21 19

22 20

23 21 Resolution No. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: April 12, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: Approve the 2012 Equalization Report recommendation as submitted by the Equalization Department INTRODUCED BY: A "Master Copy" of the 2012 Equalization Report will be provided, electronically, as soon as it is available. The local community has until April 4, 2012 to submit the data to the Equalization Department. Pursuant to MCL and , the Equalization Director files a tabular statement (L4024) of equalization for adoption by the County Board of Commissioners at their equalization session in April, then furnishes the adopted values to the State Tax Commission. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE 3/12/2012

24 22 April 09, 2012 Kathy D. Vosburg, Chairman Macomb County Board of Commissioners One South Main Street, 8 th Floor Mt. Clemens, MI Dear Chairman Vosburg: The 2012 recommendation to the Board of Commissioners from the Equalization Department is hereby submitted for the Board s review, consideration and adoption. Total State Equalized Value for previous year (2011) $26,749,661,711 Recommended Total County Equalized Value for current year (2012) $25,021,187,994 This valuation reflects a decrease of 6.96% due to the decrease in the Market Value of all properties within the County. This valuation reflects a increase of.49% due to the new construction within the County. Respectfully Submitted, Steven M. Mellen, MMAO Equalization Director SMM/jq Attachments

25 EQUALIZATION REPORT Prepared by: The Macomb County Equalization Department Steven M. Mellen, MMAO, Director

26 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT 2012 RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 24 4/5/2012 Real Real Real Real Real Real Commercial Commercial Commercial Government Unit Assessed Value C.E.V Factor to C.E.V. Assessed C.E.V. Factor to C.E.V. Cities Center Line $ 45,994,940 $ 45,994, Eastpointe 78,651,880 78,651, Fraser 66,084,836 66,084, Memphis 2,472,510 2,472, Mt. Clemens 91,919,412 91,919, New Baltimore 30,703,138 30,703, Richmond 37,547,700 37,547, Roseville 247,154, ,154, St. Clair Shores 208,399, ,399, Sterling Heights 649,253, ,253, Utica 100,582, ,582, Warren 510,962, ,962, Total Cities $ - $ - $ 2,069,726,824 $ 2,069,726,824 Townships Armada $ 24,947,500 $ 24,947, $ 9,125,450 $ 9,125, Bruce 17,036,840 17,036, ,263,030 17,263, Chesterfield 5,791,350 5,791, ,900, ,900, Clinton 634,343, ,343, Harrison 89,751,500 89,751, Grosse Pointe Shores Lenox 39,617,170 39,617, ,986,005 54,986, Macomb 7,435,240 7,435, ,146, ,146, Ray 33,157,985 33,157, ,893,006 6,893, Richmond 27,732,588 27,732, ,249,532 5,088, Shelby ,841, ,841, Washington 15,251,700 15,251, ,779,200 94,779, Total Townships $ 170,970,373 $ 170,970,373 $ 1,728,279,447 $ 1,728,118,605 Grand Total $ 170,970,373 $ 170,970,373 $ 3,798,006,271 $ 3,797,845,429 Page 1 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

27 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT 2012 RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 25 4/5/2012 Real Real Real Real Real Real Industrial Industrial Industrial Residential Residential Residential Government Unit Assessed Value C.E.V. Factor to C.E.V. Assessed Value C.E.V. Factor to C.E.V. Cities Center Line $ 22,448,850 $ 22,448, $ 71,349,740 $ 71,349, Eastpointe 1,748,210 1,748, ,689, ,689, Fraser 69,396,536 69,396, ,692, ,692, Memphis 313, , ,623,606 14,623, Mt. Clemens 30,827,643 30,827, ,939, ,939, New Baltimore 10,696,800 10,696, ,359, ,359, Richmond 4,291,100 4,291, ,095, ,095, Roseville 47,664,901 47,664, ,084, ,084, St. Clair Shores 12,418,200 12,418, ,156,284,175 1,156,284, Sterling Heights 317,041, ,041, ,530,676,550 2,530,676, Utica 2,526,187 2,526, ,585,741 71,585, Warren 479,895, ,895, ,761,111,820 1,761,111, Total Cities $ 999,268,387 $ 999,268,387 $ 7,283,494,238 $ 7,283,494,238 Townships Armada $ 11,959,550 $ 11,959, $ 139,751,100 $ 139,751, Bruce 49,593,440 49,593, ,023, ,023, Chesterfield 117,486, ,486, ,010,229,329 1,010,229, Clinton 116,811, ,811, ,741,212,100 1,741,212, Harrison 23,732,580 23,732, ,218, ,218, Grosse Pointe Shores 9,689,220 9,689, Lenox 23,313,104 23,313, ,359, ,359, Macomb 57,601,620 57,601, ,432,780,840 2,432,780, Ray 5,190,308 5,190, ,739, ,739, Richmond 1,662,559 1,641, ,844, ,128, Shelby 163,384, ,384, ,150,287,758 2,150,287, Washington 23,323,600 23,323, ,434, ,434, Total Townships $ 594,058,843 $ 594,038,120 $ 9,765,569,716 $ 9,764,854,515 Grand Total $ 1,593,327,230 $ 1,593,306,507 $ 17,049,063,954 $ 17,048,348,753 Page 2 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

28 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT 2012 RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 26 4/5/2012 Real Real Real Total Total Developmental Developmental Developmental Real Real Government Unit Assessed Value C.E.V. Factor to C.E.V. Assessed Value C.E.V. Cities Center Line $ 139,793,530 $ 139,793,530 Eastpointe 429,089, ,089,874 Fraser 381,174, ,174,244 Memphis 17,409,756 17,409,756 Mt. Clemens 298,686, ,686,541 New Baltimore 325,759, ,759,750 Richmond 152,934, ,934,600 Roseville 806,904, ,904,450 St. Clair Shores 1,377,101,595 1,377,101,595 Sterling Heights 3,496,971,300 3,496,971,300 Utica 174,694, ,694,149 Warren 2,751,969,660 2,751,969,660 Total Cities $ - $ - $ 10,352,489,449 $ 10,352,489,449 Townships Armada $ - $ - $ 185,783,600 $ 185,783,600 Bruce ,916, ,916,460 Chesterfield - - NA 1,337,407,771 1,337,407,771 Clinton 2,492,366,800 2,492,366,800 Harrison 846,702, ,702,358 Grosse Pointe Shores 9,689,220 9,689,220 Lenox - - NA 254,275, ,275,971 Macomb 25,276,190 25,276, ,720,239,990 2,720,239,990 Ray - - NA 175,980, ,980,931 Richmond 145,488, ,592,110 Shelby - - 2,728,513,672 2,728,513,672 Washington - - NA 1,016,788,920 1,016,788,920 Total Townships $ 25,276,190 $ 25,276,190 $ 12,284,154,569 $ 12,283,257,803 Grand Total $ 25,276,190 $ 25,276,190 $ 22,636,644,018 $ 22,635,747,252 Page 3 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

29 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT 2012 RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 27 4/5/2012 Personal Personal Total Assessed Personal Factor to Assessed Total Government Unit Value C.E.V. C.E.V. Value C.E.V. Cities Center Line $ 32,475,609 $ 32,475, $ 172,269,139 $ 172,269,139 Eastpointe 35,620,390 35,620, ,710, ,710,264 Fraser 62,313,511 62,313, ,487, ,487,755 Memphis 1,041,790 1,041, ,451,546 18,451,546 Mt. Clemens 52,026,447 52,026, ,712, ,712,988 New Baltimore 13,647,800 13,647, ,407, ,407,550 Richmond 8,984,300 8,984, ,918, ,918,900 Roseville 106,002, ,002, ,907, ,907,050 St. Clair Shores 65,118,200 65,118, ,442,219,795 1,442,219,795 Sterling Heights 506,194, ,194, ,003,165,700 4,003,165,700 Utica 16,331,197 16,331, ,025, ,025,346 Warren 609,201, ,201, ,361,170,897 3,361,170,897 Total Cities $ 1,508,957,481 $ 1,508,957,481 $ 11,861,446,930 $ 11,861,446,930 Townships Armada $ 40,917,284 $ 40,917, $ 226,700,884 $ 226,700,884 Bruce 58,771,290 58,771, ,687, ,687,750 Chesterfield 117,961, ,961, ,455,369,629 1,455,369,629 Clinton 190,072, ,072, ,682,439,400 2,682,439,400 Harrison 26,780,000 26,780, ,482, ,482,358 Grosse Pte Shores 118, , ,807,830 9,807,830 Lenox 39,007,403 39,007, ,283, ,283,374 Macomb 109,580, ,580, ,829,820,970 2,829,820,970 Ray 20,308,544 20,308, ,289, ,289,475 Richmond 10,714,172 10,714, ,203, ,306,282 Shelby 155,409, ,409, ,883,922,702 2,883,922,702 Washington 106,841, ,841, ,123,630,410 1,123,630,410 Total Townships $ 876,483,261 $ 876,483,261 $ 13,160,637,830 $ 13,159,741,064 Grand Total $ 2,385,440,742 $ 2,385,440,742 $ 25,022,084,760 $ 25,021,187,994 Page 4 of 4 25,022,084,760 25,021,187, Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

30 Assessor: Julie Geldhof MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF CENTER LINE /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,994, % 92,765,875 45,994, Industrial 46 22,448, % 45,130,850 22,448, Residential 2,447 71,349, % 143,931,040 71,349, Developmental Exempt 140 Real Property Totals 2, ,793, ,827, ,793,530 **Personal Property** Commercial 353 7,356, % 14,765,654 7,356,249 Industrial 12 19,741, % 39,483,892 19,741,946 Residential Utility 5 5,377, % 10,754,824 5,377,414 Personal Property Totals ,475, % 65,004,370 32,475, Combined Totals 3, ,269, ,832, ,269,139 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 01 Page 1

31 Assessor: Linda Weishaupt MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF EASTPOINTE 2012 ***Real Property*** 29 4/5/2012 Commercial ,651, % 157,716,364 78,651, Industrial 14 1,748, % 3,496,805 1,748, Residential 12, ,689, % 699,467, ,689, Developmental Exempt 188 Real Property Totals 13, ,089, ,680, ,089,874 **Personal Property** Commercial 1,149 12,893, % 25,839,098 12,893,710 Industrial 8 1,190, % 2,646,787 1,190,260 Residential Utility 6 21,536, % 43,072,834 21,536,420 Personal Property Totals 1,163 35,620, % 71,558,719 35,620, Combined Totals 15, ,710, ,239, ,710,264 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 02 Page 2

32 Assessor: Gary Blash MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF FRASER /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,084, % 132,562,873 66,084, Industrial ,396, % 138,919,549 69,396, Residential 4, ,692, % 492,258, ,692, Developmental Exempt 101 Real Property Totals 5, ,174, ,741, ,174,244 **Personal Property** Commercial ,391, % 35,100,239 17,391,794 Industrial ,390, % 78,812,333 39,390,404 Residential Utility 3 5,531, % 11,062,651 5,531,313 Personal Property Totals ,313, % 124,975,223 62,313, Combined Totals 6, ,487, ,716, ,487,755 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 03 Page 3

33 Assessor: Jaime Barra MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF MEMPHIS /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial 35 2,472, % 4,953,953 2,472, Industrial 2 313, % 628, , Residential ,623, % 29,741,682 14,623, Developmental Exempt 26 Real Property Totals ,409,756 35,324,174 17,409,756 **Personal Property** Commercial , % 429, ,760 Industrial 1 624, % 1,248, ,010 Residential Utility 2 203, % 406, ,020 Personal Property Totals 57 1,041, % 2,083,590 1,041, Combined Totals ,451,546 37,407,764 18,451,546 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 04 Page 4

34 Assessor: Nancy Strehl MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF MOUNT CLEMENS /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,919, % 184,472,562 91,919, Industrial ,827, % 61,873,592 30,827, Residential 5, ,939, % 352,436, ,939, Developmental Exempt 302 Real Property Totals 6, ,686, ,782, ,686,541 **Personal Property** Commercial ,995, % 31,951,710 15,995,026 Industrial 33 28,731, % 58,101,163 28,731,025 Residential Utility 4 7,300, % 14,600,682 7,300,396 Personal Property Totals ,026, % 104,653,555 52,026, Combined Totals 7, ,712, ,436, ,712,988 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 05 Page 5

35 Assessor: Emma Germain MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF NEW BALTIMORE /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,703, % 61,958,373 30,703, Industrial 51 10,696, % 21,445,099 10,696, Residential 4, ,359, % 570,286, ,359, Developmental Exempt 82 Real Property Totals 4, ,759, ,689, ,759,750 **Personal Property** Commercial 320 4,428, % 9,028,399 4,428,430 Industrial 17 4,304, % 8,608,160 4,304,080 Residential Utility 2 4,915, % 9,830,578 4,915,290 Personal Property Totals ,647, % 27,467,137 13,647, Combined Totals 4, ,407, ,156, ,407,550 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 06 Page 6

36 Assessor: Lynn Houston MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF RICHMOND /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,547, % 75,209,990 37,547, Industrial 16 4,291, % 8,590,004 4,291, Residential 2, ,095, % 222,497, ,095, Developmental Exempt 90 Real Property Totals 2, ,934, ,297, ,934,600 **Personal Property** Commercial 276 5,767, % 11,540,925 5,767,000 Industrial 6 998, % 1,996, ,000 Residential Utility 4 2,219, % 4,438,583 2,219,300 Personal Property Totals 286 8,984, % 17,975,508 8,984, Combined Totals 2, ,918, ,273, ,918,900 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 07 Page 7

37 Assessor: Dan Hickey MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF ROSEVILLE /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,154, % 500,454, ,154, Industrial ,664, % 96,455,202 47,664, Residential 17, ,084, % 1,035,958, ,084, Developmental Exempt 303 Real Property Totals 18, ,904,450 1,632,868, ,904,450 **Personal Property** Commercial 1,363 45,930, % 92,004,389 45,930,210 Industrial ,905, % 86,502,903 42,905,440 Residential Utility 6 17,166, % 34,328,912 17,166,950 Personal Property Totals 1, ,002, % 212,836, ,002, Combined Totals 20, ,907,050 1,845,704, ,907,050 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 08 Page 8

38 Assessor: Terri Socia MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF ST CLAIR SHORES /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial 1, ,399, % 419,171, ,399, Industrial 73 12,418, % 24,860,839 12,418, Residential 26,246 1,156,284, % 2,321,494,301 1,156,284, Developmental Exempt 353 Real Property Totals 27,740 1,377,101,595 2,765,526,867 1,377,101,595 **Personal Property** Commercial 1,522 35,674, % 71,663,319 35,674,000 Industrial 17 7,526, % 15,090,016 7,526,900 Residential Utility 8 21,917, % 43,834,453 21,917,300 Personal Property Totals 1,547 65,118, % 130,587,788 65,118, Combined Totals 29,287 1,442,219,795 2,896,114,655 1,442,219,795 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 09 Page 9

39 Assessor: Matthew Schmidt MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial 1, ,253, % 1,305,009, ,253, Industrial ,041, % 642,126, ,041, Residential 41,657 2,530,676, % 5,073,884,190 2,530,676, Developmental Exempt 574 Real Property Totals 44,005 3,496,971,300 7,021,020,740 3,496,971,300 **Personal Property** Commercial 2, ,489, % 228,947, ,489,350 Industrial ,119, % 667,306, ,119,400 Residential Utility 12 59,585, % 119,171,221 59,585,650 Personal Property Totals 2, ,194, % 1,015,425, ,194, Combined Totals 46,969 4,003,165,700 8,036,446,101 4,003,165,700 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 10 Page 10

40 Assessor: Nancy Strehl MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF UTICA /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,582, % 201,657, ,582, Industrial 27 2,526, % 5,062,270 2,526, Residential 1,357 71,585, % 144,959,190 71,585, Developmental Exempt 162 Real Property Totals 1, ,694, ,678, ,694,149 **Personal Property** Commercial ,960, % 25,942,661 12,960,953 Industrial 3 425, % 850, ,056 Residential Utility 4 2,945, % 5,890,376 2,945,188 Personal Property Totals ,331, % 32,683,149 16,331, Combined Totals 2, ,025, ,362, ,025,346 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 11 Page 11

41 Assessor: Marcia D.M. Smith MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION CITY OF WARREN /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial 2, ,962, % 1,024,798, ,962, Industrial 1, ,895, % 965,232, ,895, Residential 51,500 1,761,111, % 3,527,532,077 1,761,111, Developmental Exempt 1,981 Real Property Totals 57,172 2,751,969,660 5,517,562,628 2,751,969,660 **Personal Property** Commercial 3, ,984, % 304,151, ,984,425 Industrial ,293, % 776,897, ,293,536 Residential Utility 23 68,923, % 137,846,551 68,923,276 Personal Property Totals 4, ,201, % 1,218,895, ,201, Combined Totals 61,380 3,361,170,897 6,736,458,350 3,361,170,897 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 12 Page 12

42 Assessor: Tom Schlichting MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF ARMADA /5/2012 ***Real Property*** ,947, % 50,240,833 24,947, Commercial 70 9,125, % 18,522,358 9,125, Industrial 54 11,959, % 23,960,264 11,959, Residential 2, ,751, % 282,479, ,751, Developmental Exempt 92 Real Property Totals 2, ,783, ,202, ,783,600 **Personal Property** Commercial 138 1,689, % 3,409,322 1,689,660 Industrial 19 3,698, % 7,397,858 3,698,929 Residential Utility 12 35,528, % 71,057,393 35,528,695 Personal Property Totals ,917, % 81,864,573 40,917, Combined Totals 2, ,700, ,067, ,700,884 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 13 Page 13

43 Assessor: Lisa Griffin MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF BRUCE /5/2012 ***Real Property*** ,036, % 34,240,621 17,036, Commercial 92 17,263, % 34,878,632 17,263, Industrial ,593, % 99,745,154 49,593, Residential 3, ,023, % 582,182, ,023, Developmental Exempt 156 Real Property Totals 4, ,916, ,047, ,916,460 **Personal Property** Commercial 249 4,296, % 8,596,639 4,296,600 Industrial 47 43,288, % 86,576,940 43,288,470 Residential Utility 14 11,186, % 22,364,694 11,186,220 Personal Property Totals ,771, % 117,538,273 58,771, Combined Totals 4, ,687, ,585, ,687,750 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 14 Page 14

44 Assessor: Dean Babb MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD /5/2012 ***Real Property*** 75 5,791, % 11,582,700 5,791, Commercial ,900, % 410,152, ,900, Industrial ,486, % 235,736, ,486, Residential 16,146 1,010,229, % 2,020,356,597 1,010,229, Developmental NA Exempt 529 Real Property Totals 17,671 1,337,407,771 2,677,828,280 1,337,407,771 **Personal Property** Commercial ,287, % 70,588,402 35,287,142 Industrial ,038, % 122,493,647 61,038,584 Residential Utility 13 21,636, % 43,272,259 21,636,132 Personal Property Totals 1, ,961, % 236,354, ,961, Combined Totals 18,766 1,455,369,629 2,914,182,588 1,455,369,629 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 15 Page 15

45 Assessor: James Elrod MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial 1, ,343, % 1,276,464, ,343, Industrial ,811, % 234,289, ,811, Residential 30,614 1,741,212, % 3,487,220,041 1,741,212, Developmental Exempt 1,231 Real Property Totals 33,749 2,492,366,800 4,997,973,572 2,492,366,800 **Personal Property** Commercial 2,977 90,332, % 182,048,569 90,332,500 Industrial ,484, % 118,732,336 59,484,900 Residential Utility 14 40,255, % 80,510,594 40,255,200 Personal Property Totals 3, ,072, % 381,291, ,072, Combined Totals 36,966 2,682,439,400 5,379,265,071 2,682,439,400 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 16 Page 16

46 Assessor: Carol Ryan MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,751, % 179,958,821 89,751, Industrial ,732, % 47,598,990 23,732, Residential 10, ,218, % 1,470,601, ,218, Developmental Exempt 393 Real Property Totals 10, ,702,358 1,698,159, ,702,358 **Personal Property** Commercial 398 8,766, % 17,688,458 8,766,400 Industrial 56 6,849, % 13,857,536 6,849,780 Residential Utility 2 11,163, % 22,327,647 11,163,820 Personal Property Totals ,780, % 53,873,641 26,780, Combined Totals 11, ,482,358 1,752,032, ,482,358 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 17 Page 17

47 Assessor: Timothy O'Donnell MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION VILLAGE OF GROSSE POINTE SHORES /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial Industrial Residential 45 9,689, % 19,377,816 9,689, Developmental Exempt Real Property Totals 45 9,689,220 19,377,816 9,689,220 **Personal Property** Commercial 8 1, % 2,580 1,290 Industrial Residential Utility 2 117, % 234, ,320 Personal Property Totals , % 237, , Combined Totals 55 9,807,830 19,615,028 9,807,830 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 18 Page 18

48 Assessor: Betty Hartway MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF LENOX /5/2012 ***Real Property*** ,617, % 79,505,667 39,617, Commercial ,986, % 110,154,644 54,986, Industrial 54 23,313, % 46,653,823 23,313, Residential 2, ,359, % 273,620, ,359, Developmental NA Exempt 274 Real Property Totals 3, ,275, ,934, ,275,971 **Personal Property** Commercial 241 6,522, % 13,046,858 6,522,124 Industrial 21 7,189, % 14,379,766 7,189,883 Residential Utility 28 25,295, % 50,590,369 25,295,396 Personal Property Totals ,007, % 78,016,993 39,007, Combined Totals 3, ,283, ,951, ,283,374 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 19 Page 19

49 Assessor: Dan Hickey MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF MACOMB /5/2012 ***Real Property*** 42 7,435, % 14,976,370 7,435, Commercial ,146, % 397,406, ,146, Industrial ,601, % 116,467,957 57,601, Residential 28,492 2,432,780, % 4,878,056,198 2,432,780, Developmental 93 25,276, % 50,612,724 25,276, Exempt 137 Real Property Totals 29,254 2,720,239,990 5,457,519,575 2,720,239,990 **Personal Property** Commercial ,786, % 65,861,993 32,786,100 Industrial 52 27,686, % 55,595,622 27,686,620 Residential Utility 21 49,108, % 98,216,544 49,108,260 Personal Property Totals ,580, % 219,674, ,580, Combined Totals 30,055 2,829,820,970 5,677,193,734 2,829,820,970 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 20 Page 20

50 Assessor: Kelly Timm MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF RAY /5/2012 ***Real Property*** ,157, % 66,536,385 33,157, Commercial 114 6,893, % 13,853,594 6,893, Industrial 38 5,190, % 10,398,468 5,190, Residential 1, ,739, % 262,926, ,739, Developmental NA Exempt 193 Real Property Totals 2, ,980, ,715, ,980,931 **Personal Property** Commercial 157 2,081, % 4,211,647 2,081,817 Industrial 1 22, % 45,000 22,500 Residential Utility 23 18,204, % 36,408,445 18,204,227 Personal Property Totals ,308, % 40,665,092 20,308, Combined Totals 2, ,289, ,380, ,289,475 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 21 Page 21

51 Assessor: Cindy Smith MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF RICHMOND /5/2012 ***Real Property*** ,732, % 55,982,709 27,732, Commercial 31 5,249, % 10,177,379 5,088, Industrial 21 1,662, % 3,283,672 1,641, Residential 1, ,844, % 220,257, ,128, Developmental Exempt 44 Real Property Totals 1, ,488, ,701, ,592,110 **Personal Property** Commercial 82 1,305, % 2,598,117 1,305,554 Industrial 2 55, % 134,515 55,622 Residential Utility 18 9,352, % 18,704,987 9,352,996 Personal Property Totals ,714, % 21,437,619 10,714, Combined Totals 1, ,203, ,139, ,306,282 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 22 Page 22

52 Assessor: William Griffin MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY /5/2012 ***Real Property*** Commercial ,841, % 834,792, ,841, Industrial ,384, % 330,987, ,384, Residential 26,057 2,150,287, % 4,336,772,799 2,150,287, Developmental Exempt 515 Real Property Totals 28,066 2,728,513,672 5,502,552,970 2,728,513,672 **Personal Property** Commercial 2,049 57,340, % 115,652,441 57,340,480 Industrial ,842, % 106,066,259 52,842,210 Residential Utility 16 45,226, % 90,452,725 45,226,340 Personal Property Totals 2, ,409, % 312,171, ,409, Combined Totals 30,262 2,883,922,702 5,814,724,395 2,883,922,702 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 23 Page 23

53 Assessor: Debra Susalla MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON /5/2012 ***Real Property*** ,251, % 30,942,391 15,251, Commercial ,779, % 193,004,437 94,779, Industrial 97 23,323, % 47,205,463 23,323, Residential 9, ,434, % 1,780,481, ,434, Developmental NA Exempt 276 Real Property Totals 10,611 1,016,788,920 2,051,634,254 1,016,788,920 **Personal Property** Commercial ,352, % 29,130,160 14,352,430 Industrial 24 42,966, % 85,932,100 42,966,050 Residential Utility 20 49,523, % 99,046,027 49,523,010 Personal Property Totals ,841, % 214,108, ,841, Combined Totals 11,372 1,123,630,410 2,265,742,541 1,123,630,410 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls 24 Page 24

54 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION SUMMARY OF NEW, LOSS AND ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS BY CLASSIFICATION ALL LOCAL UNITS /5/2012 ***Real Property*** 1, ,970, % 344,007, ,970,373 Commercial 12,178 3,798,006, % 7,640,097,429 3,797,845,429 Industrial 5,048 1,593,327, % 3,210,149,161 1,593,306,507 Residential 300,958 17,049,063, % 34,228,781,543 17,048,348,753 Developmental 93 25,276, % 50,612,724 25,276,190 Exempt 8,142 Real Property Totals 327,928 22,636,644,018 45,473,648,533 22,635,747,252 **Personal Property** Commercial 21, ,848, % 1,364,200, ,848,004 Industrial 1,616 1,172,373, % 2,348,755,297 1,172,373,605 Residential Utility ,219, % 1,068,424, ,219,133 Personal Property Totals 23,178 2,385,440, % 4,781,379,407 2,385,440,742 Combined Totals 351,106 25,022,084,760 50,255,027,940 25,021,187,994 Equal 402 CountyWide.xls Summary Page 25

55 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIAZATION 2012 SUMMARY OF EQUALIZATION VALUATION CHANGES FROM THE 2011 EQUALIZATION REPORT TO THE 2012 EQUALIZATION REPORT 53 4/5/ C.E.V. C.E.V C.E.V. C.E.V. C.E.V. C.E.V. Government Unit Commercial Industrial Residential Developmental Personal Cities Center Line $ - $ 45,991,740 $ 24,387,950 $ 83,419,158 $ - $ 33,194,661 Eastpointe - 87,063,730 2,288, ,623,896-35,432,430 Fraser - 72,140,951 82,482, ,892,861-63,044,440 Memphis - 2,541, ,300 16,182,729-1,111,368 Mt. Clemens - 101,180,861 32,870, ,652,811-51,846,878 New Baltimore - 35,521,924 12,734, ,508,427-13,208,880 Richmond - 37,729,100 4,743, ,399,000-9,227,300 Roseville - 280,793,065 54,222, ,452, ,012,390 St. Clair Shores - 234,344,050 12,989,300 1,277,997,590-63,823,300 Sterling Heights - 713,771, ,837,800 2,720,689, ,463,050 Utica - 117,765,886 2,972,110 75,888,947-16,833,354 Warren - 591,055, ,359,600 2,006,909, ,336,034 Total Cities $ - $ 2,319,899,519 $ 1,108,270,319 $ 8,082,617,463 $ - $ 1,519,534,085 Townships Armada $ 25,403,947 $ 9,827,154 $ 11,613,767 $ 156,101,209 $ - $ 29,561,964 Bruce 15,968,590 19,942,980 55,692, ,209,933-59,201,040 Chesterfield 10,983, ,911, ,254,945 1,055,705, ,892,903 Clinton 682,790, ,231,500 1,863,727, ,867,100 Harrison 96,544,780 28,285, ,724,883-25,886,720 Grosse Pte Shores ,010,475-66,680 Lenox 42,733,478 63,707,912 25,110, ,285,403-41,308,291 Macomb 7,218, ,784,570 65,437,792 2,476,207,900 5,165, ,347,870 Ray 32,563,855 8,062,753 6,182, ,496,820-19,605,883 Richmond 27,597,956 5,340,071 1,676, ,721,307-9,082,210 Shelby 452,121, ,752,553 2,195,710, ,327,149 Washington 15,497, ,517,500 27,156, ,498, ,714,120 Total Townships $ 177,967,326 $ 1,898,552,310 $ 652,394,044 $ 10,118,399,665 $ 5,165,050 $ 866,861,930 Grand Total $ 177,967,326 $ 4,218,451,829 $ 1,760,664,363 $ 18,201,017,128 $ 5,165,050 $ 2,386,396,015 Page 1 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

56 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIAZATION 2012 SUMMARY OF EQUALIZATION VALUATION CHANGES FROM THE 2011 EQUALIZATION REPORT TO THE 2012 EQUALIZATION REPORT 54 4/5/ C.E.V. C.E.V C.E.V. C.E.V. C.E.V. C.E.V. Government Unit Commercial Industrial Residential Developmental Personal Cities Center Line $ - $ 45,994,940 $ 22,448,850 $ 71,349,740 $ - $ 32,475,609 Eastpointe - 78,651,880 1,748, ,689,784-35,620,390 Fraser - 66,084,836 69,396, ,692,872-62,313,511 Memphis - 2,472, ,640 14,623,606-1,041,790 Mt. Clemens - 91,919,412 30,827, ,939,486-52,026,447 New Baltimore - 30,703,138 10,696, ,359,812-13,647,800 Richmond - 37,547,700 4,291, ,095,800-8,984,300 Roseville - 247,154,697 47,664, ,084, ,002,600 St. Clair Shores - 208,399,220 12,418,200 1,156,284,175-65,118,200 Sterling Heights - 649,253, ,041,000 2,530,676, ,194,400 Utica - 100,582,221 2,526,187 71,585,741-16,331,197 Warren - 510,962, ,895,320 1,761,111, ,201,237 Total Cities $ - $ 2,069,726,824 $ 999,268,387 $ 7,283,494,238 $ - $ 1,508,957,481 Townships Armada $ 24,947,500 $ 9,125,450 $ 11,959,550 $ 139,751,100 $ - $ 40,917,284 Bruce 17,036,840 17,263,030 49,593, ,023,150-58,771,290 Chesterfield 5,791, ,900, ,486,462 1,010,229, ,961,858 Clinton - 634,343, ,811,300 1,741,212, ,072,600 Harrison - 89,751,500 23,732, ,218,278-26,780,000 Grosse Pointe Shores ,689, ,610 Lenox 39,617,170 54,986,005 23,313, ,359,692-39,007,403 Macomb 7,435, ,146,100 57,601,620 2,432,780,840 25,276, ,580,980 Ray 33,157,985 6,893,006 5,190, ,739,632-20,308,544 Richmond 27,732,588 5,088,690 1,641, ,128,996-10,714,172 Shelby - 414,841, ,384,320 2,150,287, ,409,030 Washington 15,251,700 94,779,200 23,323, ,434, ,841,490 Total Townships $ 170,970,373 $ 1,728,118,605 $ 594,038,120 $ 9,764,854,515 $ 25,276,190 $ 876,483,261 Grand Total $ 170,970,373 $ 3,797,845,429 $ 1,593,306,507 $ 17,048,348,753 $ 25,276,190 $ 2,385,440,742 Page 2 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

57 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIAZATION 2012 SUMMARY OF EQUALIZATION VALUATION CHANGES FROM THE 2011 EQUALIZATION REPORT TO THE 2012 EQUALIZATION REPORT 55 4/5/ or - + or - + or - + or - + or - + or - Commercial Industrial Residential Developmental Personal Government Unit C.E.V. from 2011 C.E.V. from 2011 C.E.V. from 2011 C.E.V. from 2011 C.E.V. from 2011 C.E.V. from 2011 Cities Center Line $ 3,200 $ (1,939,100) $ (12,069,418) $ (719,052) Eastpointe (8,411,850) (540,260) (69,934,112) 187,960 Fraser (6,056,115) (13,086,180) (15,199,989) (730,929) Memphis (68,722) (1,559,123) (69,578) Mt. Clemens (9,261,449) (2,042,619) (28,713,325) 179,569 New Baltimore (4,818,786) (2,037,300) (16,148,615) 438,920 Richmond (181,400) (452,300) (11,303,200) (243,000) Roseville (33,638,368) (6,557,410) (82,367,853) 1,990,210 St. Clair Shores (25,944,830) (571,100) (121,713,415) 1,294,900 Sterling Heights (64,517,500) (37,796,800) (190,013,050) 11,731,350 Utica (17,183,665) (445,923) (4,303,206) (502,157) Warren (80,093,210) (43,464,280) (245,797,919) (24,134,797) Total Cities $ - $ (250,172,695) $ (108,933,272) $ (799,123,225) $ - $ (10,576,604) Townships Armada $ (456,447) $ (701,704) $ 345,783 $ (16,350,109) $ - $ 11,355,320 Bruce 1,068,250 (2,679,950) (6,098,720) 813,217 - (429,750) Chesterfield (5,192,100) (23,011,260) (15,768,483) (45,475,678) - (931,045) Clinton (48,447,500) (2,420,200) (122,515,500) - (794,500) Harrison - (6,793,280) (4,552,670) (31,506,605) - 893,280 Grosse Pointe Shores (1,321,255) - 51,930 Lenox (3,116,308) (8,721,907) (1,796,901) (12,925,711) - (2,300,888) Macomb 216,390 (30,638,470) (7,836,172) (43,427,060) 20,111,140 5,233,110 Ray 594,130 (1,169,747) (992,621) (9,757,188) - 702,661 Richmond 134,632 (251,382) (34,807) (592,311) - 1,631,962 Shelby - (37,280,206) (15,368,233) (45,423,020) - (3,918,119) Washington (245,500) (10,738,300) (3,832,900) (25,063,930) - (1,872,630) Total Townships $ (6,996,953) $ (170,433,706) $ (58,355,924) $ (353,545,150) $ 20,111,140 $ 9,621,331 Grand Total $ (6,996,953) $ (420,606,401) $ (167,289,196) $ (1,152,668,375) $ 20,111,140 $ (955,273) Page 3 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

58 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIAZATION 2012 SUMMARY OF EQUALIZATION VALUATION CHANGES FROM THE 2011 EQUALIZATION REPORT TO THE 2012 EQUALIZATION REPORT 56 4/5/ Increase or Decrease Per Cent Government Unit Total C.E.V. Total C.E.V. C.E.V. from 2011 of County Volume Cities Center Line $ 186,993,509 $ 172,269,139 $ (14,724,370) 0.69% Eastpointe 543,408, ,710,264 (78,698,262) 1.86% Fraser 478,560, ,487,755 (35,073,213) 1.77% Memphis 20,217,629 18,451,546 (1,766,083) 0.07% Mt. Clemens 390,550, ,712,988 (39,837,824) 1.40% New Baltimore 361,973, ,407,550 (22,565,781) 1.36% Richmond 174,098, ,918,900 (12,179,900) 0.65% Roseville 1,033,480, ,907,050 (120,573,421) 3.65% St. Clair Shores 1,589,154,240 1,442,219,795 (146,934,445) 5.76% Sterling Heights 4,283,761,700 4,003,165,700 (280,596,000) 16.00% Utica 213,460, ,025,346 (22,434,951) 0.76% Warren 3,754,661,103 3,361,170,897 (393,490,206) 13.43% Total Cities $ 13,030,321,386 $ 11,861,446,930 $ (1,168,874,456) 47.41% Townships Armada $ 232,508,041 $ 226,700,884 $ (5,807,157) 0.91% Bruce 437,014, ,687,750 (7,326,953) 1.72% Chesterfield 1,545,748,195 1,455,369,629 (90,378,566) 5.82% Clinton 2,856,617,100 2,682,439,400 (174,177,700) 10.72% Harrison 915,441, ,482,358 (41,959,275) 3.49% Grosse Pointe Shores 11,077,155 9,807,830 (1,269,325) 0.04% Lenox 322,145, ,283,374 (28,861,715) 1.17% Macomb 2,886,162,032 2,829,820,970 (56,341,062) 11.31% Ray 206,912, ,289,475 (10,622,765) 0.78% Richmond 154,418, ,306, , % Shelby 2,985,912,280 2,883,922,702 (101,989,578) 11.53% Washington 1,165,383,670 1,123,630,410 (41,753,260) 4.49% Total Townships $ 13,719,340,325 $ 13,159,741,064 $ (559,599,261) 52.59% Grand Total $ 26,749,661,711 $ 25,021,187,994 $ (1,728,473,717) % Page 4 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

59 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIAZATION 2012 SUMMARY OF EQUALIZATION VALUATION CHANGES FROM THE 2011 EQUALIZATION REPORT TO THE 2012 EQUALIZATION REPORT 57 4/5/2012 County Equalized Value: 2011 $ 26,749,661,711 Increase Due to Price Adjustments (based on Residue of 2011 C.E.V.) -6.96% Net Growth (based on 2011 C.E.V. ) 0.49% County Equalized Value: 2012 $ 25,021,187,994 Assessed Value Inc/(Decr) over Previous Year $ (1,728,473,717) Overall Assessment Reduction % -6.46% Page 5 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

60 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION PERCENT OF COUNTY TOTALS REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY 58 4/5/2012 Real Percent Real Percent Real Percent Of County Commercial Of County Industrial Of County Government Unit C.E.V. Total C.E.V. Total C.E.V. Total Cities Center Line $ - $ 45,994, % $ 22,448, % Eastpointe - 78,651, % 1,748, % Fraser - 66,084, % 69,396, % Memphis - 2,472, % 313,640 Mt. Clemens - 91,919, % 30,827, % New Baltimore - 30,703, % 10,696, % Richmond - 37,547, % 4,291, % Roseville - 247,154, % 47,664, % St. Clair Shores - 208,399, % 12,418, % Sterling Heights - 649,253, % 317,041, % Utica - 100,582, % 2,526,187 Warren - 510,962, % 479,895, % Total Cities $ - $ 2,069,726, % $ 999,268, % Townships Armada $ 24,947, % $ 9,125, % $ 11,959, % Bruce 17,036, % 17,263, % 49,593, % Chesterfield 5,791, % 203,900, % 117,486, % Clinton - 634,343, % 116,811, % Harrison - 89,751, % 23,732, % Grosse Pte Shores Lenox 39,617, % 54,986, % 23,313, % Macomb 7,435, % 197,146, % 57,601, % Ray 33,157, % 6,893, % 5,190, % Richmond 27,732, % 5,088, % 1,641, % Shelby - 414,841, % 163,384, % Washington 15,251, % 94,779, % 23,323, % Total Townships $ 170,970, % $ 1,728,118, % $ 594,038, % Grand Total $ 170,970, % $ 3,797,845, % $ 1,593,306, % Page 1 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

61 MACOMB COUNTY EQUALIZATION PERCENT OF COUNTY TOTALS REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY 59 4/5/2012 Real Percent Real Percent Percent Total Residential Of County Developmental Of County Personal Of County Total Percent Government Unit C.E.V. Total C.E.V. Total C.E.V. Total C.E.V. Of County Cities Center Line $ 71,349, % $ - $ 32,475, % $ 172,269, % Eastpointe 348,689, % - 35,620, % 464,710, % Fraser 245,692, % - 62,313, % 443,487, % Memphis 14,623, % - 1,041, % 18,451, % Mt. Clemens 175,939, % - 52,026, % 350,712, % New Baltimore 284,359, % - 13,647, % 339,407, % Richmond 111,095, % - 8,984, % 161,918, % Roseville 512,084, % - 106,002, % 912,907, % St. Clair Shores 1,156,284, % - 65,118, % 1,442,219, % Sterling Heights 2,530,676, % - 506,194, % 4,003,165, % Utica 71,585, % - 16,331, % 191,025, % Warren 1,761,111, % - 609,201, % 3,361,170, % Total Cities $ 7,283,494, % $ - $ 1,508,957, % $ 11,861,446, % Townships Armada $ 139,751, % $ - $ 40,917, % $ 226,700, % Bruce 287,023, % - 58,771, % $ 429,687, % Chesterfield 1,010,229, % - 117,961, % $ 1,455,369, % Clinton 1,741,212, % - 190,072, % $ 2,682,439, % Harrison 733,218, % - 26,780, % $ 873,482, % Grosse Pointe Shores 9,689, % - 118, % $ 9,807, % Lenox 136,359, % - 39,007, % $ 293,283, % Macomb 2,432,780, % 25,276, % 109,580, % $ 2,829,820, % Ray 130,739, % - 20,308, % $ 196,289, % Richmond 110,128, % - 10,714, % $ 155,306, % Shelby 2,150,287, % - 155,409, % $ 2,883,922, % Washington 883,434, % - 106,841, % $ 1,123,630, % Total Townships $ 9,764,854, % $ 25,276, % $ 876,483, % $ 13,159,741, % Grand Total $ 17,048,348, % $ 25,276, % $ 2,385,440, % $ 25,021,187, % Page 2 of Equal 402 CountyWide.xls

62 EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT SENIORITY LIST 60 APPRAISAL STAFF Equalization NAME OF EMPLOYEE CERTIFICATION HELD SENIORITY DATE Steven M. Mellen, Director MMAO (4) 06/19/00 Theresa Moceri MAAO (3) & P.P. Auditor 02/23/87 Personal Property Manager Sandra Birkenshaw MAAO (3) & P.P. Examiner 11/13/01 Real Property Manager Kristine Greschak, Appraiser II MCAO & P.P. Examiner 12/02/02 Jeanette Makowiec, Appraiser II MAAO (3) & P.P. Examiner 02/14/05 Mary B. Smith, Appraiser II MAAO (3) & P.P. Examiner 06/26/06 MI Master Assessing Officer (MMAO) MI Advanced Assessing Officer (MAAO) MI Certified Assessing Officer (MCAO) CLERICAL STAFF Nancy Brockman Typist Clerk III 11/13/95 Laura Nixon Typist Clerk III 04/18/05 Vacant Senior Secretary 4/5/2012

63 61 RESOLUTION NO. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF McCONAGHY & NYOVICH TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN VS MACOMB COUNTY AND MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF ANTHONY M. WICKERSHAM WHICH IS PENDING IN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of McConaghy & Nyovich to represent the County in the above lawsuit pending in Macomb County Circuit Court. Police Officers Association of Michigan filed a Complaint in Macomb County Circuit Court asking for an injunction against the County which would prevent the County from deducting the cost of health care provided to members of the POAM. As you may recall, the state limits the amount that a public employer may pay for the cost of heath care insurance for its employees. The health care cost for the POAM members exceed those limits. The County is merely attempted to comply with the requirements of the state law. The law firm of McConaghy & Nyovich and in particularly Tim McConaghy has been involved in the negotiations concerning the POAM and are familiar with the statues and issues involved. They have represented the County in other labor matters over the years. It is requested that the Board of Commissioners concur in this appointment. Should you have any questions regarding the above lawsuit, please feel free to contact our office. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE 4/11/12

64 62 RESOLUTION NO. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF YORK DOLAN & TOMLINSON, PC TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED KEN HAGAR VS. COUNTY OF MACOMB, MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS AND/OR MACOMB COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION WHICH IS PENDING IN THE MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE This lawsuit was recently filed in the Macomb County Circuit Court. The allegations are that the Department of Roads, in June of 2011, was doing work in or around the Plaintiff s home. It is alleged that because of the work that was being done, significant water damage resulted to the Plaintiff s home. Prior to the Department of Roads being a department of the County, it was the jurisdiction and responsibility for these types of actions to fall on the Macomb County Road Commission. During the previous time that the Road Commission was in existence Mr. Jack Dolan did a majority of the defense work on behalf of the Department of Roads. Mr. Hoepfner has indicated that the work done by Mr. Dolan s firm in defending the Road Commission was more than satisfactory and he recommends, and I concur, in the appointment of Mr. Dolan and his law firm to handle the representation of the County and the Department of Roads in this pending litigation. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE 4/11/12

65 63 RESOLUTION NO. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF CUMMINGS McCLOREY DAVIS & ACHO PLC TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED JOSEPH CORSETTI VS. MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ET AL, WHICH IS PENDING IN FEDERAL COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho PLC to represent the County in the above lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that was filed by Joseph Corsetti in Federal Court alleging violation of his civil rights while an inmate at the Macomb County Jail. This lawsuit alleges various violations of his constitutional rights. Mr. Timothy Ferrand of the law firm of Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho PLC has represented the County and other municipalities throughout the Southeast Michigan on these types of constitutional rights claims and jail cases and is very experienced in this area. It is the recommendation of the Office of Corporation Counsel that the law firm of Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho PLC, particularly Mr. Ferrand, continue to represent the County Defendants in this pending litigation. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE 4/11/12

66 64

67 65

68 ~S ~~(, CORPORATION COUNSEL ~ 1818 ~ 1 South Main St., 8 th Floor flj ~ < it'c::""igp.~ Mark A. Hackel County Executive.. Mount Clemens, Michigan Phone: (586) Fax: (586) MEMORANDUM 66 Corporation Counsel George E. Brumbaugh. Jr. Assistant Corporation Counsel Frank Krycia James S. Meyerand Jill K. Smith TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Don Brown, Chair Finance Committee George E. Brumbaugh, J~ Corporation Counsel April 3, 2012 Establishing Compensation for Countywide Elected Officials & Commissioners The County Charter establishes the methods and time period during which the Board of Commissioners must establish compensation for the term of office for the aforementioned Elected Officials. Prior to the adoption of the County Charter, the compensation of the Elected Officials and the Commissioners was done by a resolution. Section of the Charter requires that the establishment of the compensation for the Countywide Elected Officials and Commissioners must be done by ordinance. Further, state law provides that the compensation of the Elected Officials will be for the term of their office and that such compensation cannot be lowered during that term. State law further provides that during the term of office of an Elected Official, their compensation could be raised. The Charter, however, now indicates that an increase in compensation for a Countywide Elected Official is not effective until the commencement of the new term of office. Thus, any increase in compensation for all the aforementioned Elected Officials may only take effect at the commencement of a new term of office for them. Pursuant to statute and Attorney General Opinions interpreting same, the compensation of the Elected Officials could be established before the commencement of their office. The Charter clearly now provides that the ordinance establishing the compensation for Elected Officials must be adopted before the filing deadline for the office. '. This office has prepared two ordinances, one for the Countywide Elected Officials and one for the Board of Commissioners. Because the term of office for the Countywide

69 Bo" Brawn, e"'air, Finl!mee eemmittee April 3, 2012 Page 2 67 Elected Officials is four years and there are differences in such things as fringe benefits, two separate ordinances are proposed. In 2011, a compensation ordinance was passed by the Board of Commissioners to establish its compensation through December 31,2012. This proposed ordinance concerning the Board of Commissioners is in conformity with the prior ordinance passed by this Board last year. With regard to the Countywide Elected Officials, the proposed ordinance mirrors very closely the past pay resolutions that have been passed by the Board in establishing the compensation and fringe benefits for the Countywide Elected Officials. The amounts of money for the salaries for both the Countywide Elected Officials and the Board of Commissioners remains the same as it has in the last pay resolutions and ordinance in the prior term of office for the aforementioned Elected Officials. YOIJ have asked this office to also comment on the request by the Public Works Commissioner for an increase in compensation for the additional duties that office has undertaken with regard to the Macomb County Waste Water Disposal District. It is totally within the discretion of the Board of Commissioners to determine the appropriate salary for the Public Works Commissioner, as well as the other Countywide Elected Officials taking into consideration their job duties and responsibilities. State statute, MCl , does require that the compensation paid to the Public Works Commissioner is to be paid from the General Fund of the County in the same manner and at the same time as other County employees are paid. The correspondence from the Public Works Commissioner for compensation for the additional duties he has undertaken for overseeing the Macomb County Waste Water Disposal District has been reviewed as requested. The proposal is that any increase in compensation could be paid by the Waste Water Disposal District. Its creation and management is set in Public Act 342 of This office could find no authority to pay compensation to Officials of the Department of Public Works from any funds collected by a sewer district. GEB/mla

70 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1 S. Main St., 9 th Floor Mount Clemens, Michigan FAX macombcountymi.gov/boardofcommissioners 68 April 4, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: Finance Committee Don Brown, Finance Committee Chair Correspondence from Public Works Commissioner Attached is correspondence from Public Works Commissioner Marrocco, dated March 30, 2012, regarding his request for a salary adjustment, which is referenced in the April 3, 2012 correspondence from Corporation Counsel. MACOMB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Kathy D. Vosburg District 8 Chair Marvin E. Sauger District 2 Vice Chair Fred Miller District 9 Sergeant-At-Arms Toni Moceri District 1 Phillip A DiMaria- District 3 David Flynn - District 4 Ray Gralewski- District 5 James L. Carabelli - District 6 Don Brown- District 7 Roland Fraschetti- District 10 Kathy Tocco- District 11 Bob Smith- District 12 Joe Sabatini- District 13

71 69 Anthony V. Marrocco Public Works Commissioner Macomb County March 30, 2012 Don Brown, Chairman, Finance Committee Macomb County Board of Commissioners Macomb County Administration BUilding Mount Clemens MI Re: Compensation Adjustment! Macomb County Public Works Commissioner Dear Chairperson Brown: Submitted herewith for approval by the Finance Committee on April 11,2012 and full Board of Commissioners on April 12, 2012 is a request for a compensation adjustment for the position of Macomb County Public Works Commissioner. The supplement will have no impact on the Macomb County general fund or county budget, as the proposed adjustment will be paid for by the Macomb County Wastewater Disposal District. The adjustment being requested is $24,000. It will provide an adjusted annual compensation for the Public Works Commissioner of $135,540. The adjustment will place the Macomb County Public Works Commissioner's compensation in a range commensurate with the compensation of drain commissioners in the counties of Oakland and Genesee, (Wayne County is not representative. It does not have an elected drain commissioner and the duties are spread among several positions.) The salaries of the Oakland and Genesee county drain commissioners, which are comparable to Macomb County in terms of workload and responsibilities, are $135,524 and $134,150 respectively. The compensation for the Public Works Commissioner has not been increased in six years. IF the pay rate had been adjusted for the cost of living from 2006 to 2012, the salary today would stand at $132,806. So I am basically requesting an adjustment equal to the cost of living plus $2,734. Because the compensation can be raised only once every four years, if it is not increased this year, the salary for the Public Works Commissioner will be unchanged for a period of ten years, The adjustment is warranted based on the addition of major duties and responsibilities that have been delegated to the Public Works Commissioner in connection with the management and administration of the expanded Macomb County Wastewater Disposal District, the newly formed Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District (MID) and the recently created Oakland Macomb Interceptor (OMI) Drain Drainage District. Prior to 2009 the Macomb Interceptor and Oakland Macomb Interceptor districts had not been formed and the Macomb County sewer district was a contractual authority with few ownership obligations. The sewer system in Macomb County, as it then existed, was owned and operated by the city of Detroit. which billed the counties for service through sewer rates. That situation changed dramatically after 2009 with the transfer of ownership of the inter~ ceptor system from Detroit to Macomb and Oakland counties. OFFICE LOCATION: Dunham Road, Clinlon Township, MI Phone: Fax: MAILING ADDRESS. PO. Box 806, Mount Clemens, MI ENGINEERING: - Phone Fax: SOIL EROSION: - Phone: Fax:

72 70 Forty two miles of large capacity sewer interceptors, pump stations and appurtenances worth millions of dollars have been added to the physical inventory of assets under our ju~ risdiction and control. The Macomb County Wastewater Disposal District and Macomb Interceptor Drainage District have service populations of 500,000 in eleven municipalities, while the OMI Drain Drainage District serves a joint Macomb-Oakland county population of 833,000 in 25 communities. The work effort required to manage and administer these systems represents a major expansion of duties and obligations for the Public Works Commissioner. A $160 million, five year, rehabilitation and repair program is in progress in the Oakland Macomb District. In the Macomb District, work has commenced on a $30 million contract to upgrade the Clintondale Pump Station and a series of initiatives has been launched to re store the structural integrity of the interceptors, meters and manhole structures. The county budget for Wastewater Services will not be increased by the proposed adjustment because the adjustment will be paid from the line item of $80,000 earmarked in the 2012 budget for the salary of director, which is currently vacant. The director's position will remain unfilled. I request that the adjustment be made payable effective January 1, 2012 as I have been performing the additional duties for three years. The Charter provision at Section stating that increases in salary for elected officials shall not take effect until the start of a new term (January 1, 2013) does not apply in my situation because the Charter language refers to "county" salaries, whereas this adjustment will be paid by the sewer district. To reiterate, the proposed adjustment for the Public Works Commissioner is not a general salary increase for pre-existing duties. It is an adjustment to the base pay predicated on the addition of operational tasks and responsibilities. Previously, former Public Works Commissioner Thomas S. Welsh was paid separately for his work as a drain commissioner, soil erosion control supervisor and administrator of the original sewer system before the salaries were combined into one base salary. I am suggesting that a similar approach be employed in this instance, Le., a supplement to the base salary for assumption of additional duties. Please forward a copy of the Finance Committee agenda for April 11 when it is available indicating that this matter will be considered. Thank you for your consideration. Please advise if there are any questions. Sincerely, {/~! // AfM-~"-<-./"/7-; '"'/ Anthony V. Marrocco Macomb County Public Works Commissioner cc: Kathy Vosburg, Chair, Board of Commissioners Peter Provenzano, County Finance Director Corinne Bedard, Board Office