2006 Global Integrity Country Assessments and Global Integrity Index: Methodology White Paper
|
|
- Gervase Davidson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2006 Global Integrity Country Assessments and Global Integrity Index: Methodology White Paper The Global Integrity Approach Global Integrity's Integrity Indicators provide the underpinning for our core reporting and analysis on governance and corruption. The Indicators represent the world's most comprehensive data set providing quantitative data and analysis of corruption, rule-oflaw, openness, and business climate in diverse countries around the globe. Utilizing our network of several hundred on-the-ground analysts and our unique scoring system, Global Integrity generates actionable data and qualitative analysis from the indicators that assess a country's openness and potential for corruption. The Integrity Indicators are based on a simple yet revolutionary concept. Rather than trying to measure actual corruption, considered virtually impossible by experts, Global Integrity quantitatively measures the opposite of corruption, that is, the access that citizens and businesses have to a country's government, their ability to monitor its behavior, and their ability to seek redress and advocate for improved governance. The Integrity Indicators break down that "access" into a number of categories and questions, ranging from inquiries into electoral practices and media freedom to budget transparency and conflicts of interests regulations. We unpack these concepts by looking not only at what laws or institutions are on the books but by assessing their staffing levels, budget independence, political independence, and citizen access to the most important anticorruption mechanisms. Combined with vivid narration prepared by our unparalleled team of leading journalists, the extensive data provided by the Integrity Indicators informs and empowers citizens, activists, donors, businesses, and governments in any country. Global Integrity provides detailed data and comparative country-by-country assessments of the mechanisms in place to prevent abuses of power and promote public integrity. Using a blend of social science and journalism, in-country teams of independent social scientists and investigative journalists report on the de jure as well as de facto reality of corruption and anti-corruption mechanisms. While the Reporter s Notebook on the culture of corruption often paints a depressing picture (how corruption looks, tastes, feels and smells to the average citizen), the Integrity Indicators identify strengths and weaknesses in the national anti-corruption architecture and serve as a road map for possible reforms. Transparency, both in terms of our methodology and findings, is what characterizes the Global Integrity approach and enhances the robustness and credibility of our findings. As we continue to improve our methodology and learn from our field work experiences, we welcome your critical feedback Global Integrity th Street N.W. Suite 1040 Washington, D.C USA Website: info@globalintegrity.org Office: Fax:
2 Washington Team The core Global Integrity team in Washington [hyperlink to Who We Are staff page on site] both identifies and manages our teams of local, in country reporters and researchers who are primarily responsible for collecting the raw reporting and data that ultimately generates the Global Integrity country assessments and Global Integrity Index. The core staff in Washington undertakes additional research and analysis for the various components of the annual Global Integrity Report and other projects, as well as ongoing fundraising, communications and outreach activities. In 2006, Global Integrity benefited greatly from the feedback of an informal methodology advisory committee set up to provide technical assistance and feedback on methodological and scoring issues. The group included the following experts acting in their personal capacity: Omar Azfar (IRIS) Monica Dorhoi (World Bank) Gregory Kisunko (World Bank) Andrew Greene (USAID) Jennifer Gauck (ABA-CEELI) Leslie Harper (Inter-American Development Bank) Gregory Kisunko (World Bank) Steve Knack (World Bank) Gerardo Munck (University of Southern California) Brad Parks (Millennium Challenge Corporation) Gary Reid (World Bank) Joe Siegle (DAI) Fernando Straface (Inter-American Development Bank) We are grateful for these individuals feedback and encouragement. Global Integrity is responsible for all interpretation and assessments of the data and reporting as well as for any mistakes made. Fieldwork and Country Selection From June to December 2006, Global Integrity conducted field research (strictly covering the period June 2005 to end of May 2006) in the following 43 countries or territories: Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Benin, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Israel, Kenya, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mexico, Montenegro, Mozambique, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Romania, Russia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Uganda, the United States of America, Viet Nam, the West Bank, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. 2
3 While our ambition remains to cover all countries and regions of the world, the final set of countries for 2006 was chosen according to the following criteria: 1. Balance: Global Integrity seeks to ensure a basic geographic balance in its annual rounds of country assessments. For 2006, the breakdown is as follows: Africa: 15 (Benin, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Mexico, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe) South East Asia: 4 (Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Viet Nam) Europe: 5 (Bulgaria, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia) Latin America: 5 (Argentina, Brazil, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua Middle East: 5 (Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, the West Bank, Yemen). South and Central Asia: 8 (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, India, Kyrgyz Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Tajikistan) North America: 1 (United States of America) In selecting countries we referred to Freedom House s annual Freedom in the World survey [hyperlink to to ensure balanced coverage. Of this year s countries, 15 were ranked by Freedom House in 2006 as Free, 17 were Partly Free, and 11 were Not Free. 2. Budget: The current budget of Global Integrity limits our ability to undertake an increasing number of country assessments although our goal remains to expand our coverage to true global coverage, at least on an alternating year basis. The total number of countries covered in 2006, 43, was the maximum number of countries we could afford to assess thanks to the generous support of our current funders [link to Support Us page]. 3. Availability of experts: Perhaps the most important criteria that affects whether a country is selected is whether Global Integrity is able to recruit a sufficiently qualified research team in the country. We cannot, and do not, carry out country assessments where we lack confidence in our team. See additional details below on how country teams are recruited and selected. 4. Emphasis on large aid recipient countries: For 2006, our financial support from the World Bank included assessing a number of International Development Association [hyperlink to (the classification for the Bank s very poorest client countries). This explains the larger selection of sub-saharan African countries compared to other regions. 3
4 5. Emphasis on emerging markets: For 2006, Global Integrity also sought to increase its coverage of emerging markets in order to appeal to the private investment community. As such, our 2006 list of countries covered includes eleven of the 25 countries defined as emerging markets according to Morgan Stanley Capital International s (MSCI) July 2006 Emerging Markets Index [hyperlink to 6. Appeal to the international policy community: For 2006, we included 14 countries that were either eligible or threshold countries under the Millennium Challenge Corporation s [hyperlink to criteria. Thirty eight of our 2006 countries are signatories to the U.N. Convention Against Corruption [hyperlink to Our 2006 sample is by no means globally representative but provides interesting country coverage across several key variables. Country Teams Global Integrity combines the skills of leading journalists with expert social scientists and researchers to produce its comprehensive country assessments. In each country, Global Integrity retained a team of at least four or five researchers, working independently, to compile the material for the country assessments. A Global Integrity country team typically consists of: A lead reporter who writes the Reporter s Notebook. A lead social scientist who compiles the initial scores for the Integrity Indicators. Two to six additional country readers (a mix of other in-country experts and out-of-country experts) who blindly review the raw data and reporting to provide additional perspectives and serve as part of the quality control mechanism. The teams are coordinated from Washington via the Internet and phone. Until the public release of the country assessments, the social scientists, journalists, and peer reviewers are unaware of the identities of other members of the country team. This is done to maintain the independence of the individual responses and avoid a peer-influenced consensus. Global Integrity s country assessments are produced through a coordinated effort of a large number of researchers and journalists, the vast majority of them located in-country. To identify appropriate social scientists, journalists, and peer reviewers in each country, Global Integrity actively recruits potential team members through informal partnerships with several well-placed international NGOs that work in the anti-corruption and good governance field. We also heavily recruit at international conferences and seek referrals 4
5 from colleagues with whom we already work in various countries. Prospective team members undergo a thorough background check to verify their expertise and independence (as a policy, Global Integrity does not retain an individual if the individual works in or for the government). For 2006, we received around 550 CVs from individuals who expressed interest in serving on a country team in one of our three distinct capacities (journalist, lead researcher, or country reader). After a competitive internal selection process, the most qualified and available social scientists and journalists in each country were identified, invited, and sent a contract with specific instructions on the scope of the work. The total number of country team members for 2006 was more than 220. The Country Reports For each of the 43 countries, Global Integrity produces an online Country Report that includes: Country Facts: Prepared by Global Integrity staff, these are drawn from a variety of publicly-available sources and provide basic political and economic background information on every country assessed. Corruption Timelines: compiled by Global Integrity researchers in Washington, these are a unique political/historical timeline of significant corruption-related events at the national level. Designed as a quick reference resource, each timeline summarizes the main corruption-related events in the country from the early 1990s through present-day. Based largely on reliable English-language international and national media sources, the Corruption Timeline pulls together in an easy-to-read, chronological fashion what is essentially in the public domain about corruption in a particular country. The Reporter s Notebooks: prepared by the lead in-country journalist, these are 1,250-word original essays by leading journalists on the culture of corruption and state of governance in a particular country. This hard-hitting, impressionistic essay provides a snapshot of corruption in day-to-day life as well as the recent history and context regarding the most high-profile corruption cases dominating that country s media. The Integrity Scorecard: prepared by the lead in-country social scientist/researchers. Each country s Integrity Indicators are aggregated to generate the Global Integrity Index (see additional details below). Details on the Integrity Scorecard The Integrity Scorecard for each country examines three things: 1. The existence of public integrity mechanisms, including laws and institutions, which promote public accountability and limit corruption. 5
6 2. The effectiveness of these mechanisms. 3. The access that citizens have to these mechanisms. More specifically, indicators of existence assess the laws, regulations, and agencies/entities or equivalently functioning mechanisms that are in place in a particular country. Indicators of effectiveness assess such aspects of public integrity as protection from political interference; appointments that support the independence of an agency; professional, full-time staff and funding; independently initiated investigations; and imposition of penalties. Indicators of citizen access assess the ready availability of public reports to citizens, or publicly available information, within a reasonable time period and at a reasonable cost. The Integrity Indicators are a unique instrument designed to provide a quantitative assessment of anti-corruption safeguards in a particular country. Carefully selected from a comprehensive review of the anti-corruption literature and other democratic governance sources, and building on Transparency International s National Integrity Systems approach to assessing governance, the Integrity Indicators are used to score the institutional framework that exists at the national level to promote public integrity and accountability and prevent abuses of power. For 2006, the 75 core Integrity Indicators (290 including sub-indicators) were organized into six main governance categories and 23 sub-categories. They are: I Civil Society, Public Information and Media I-1 Civil Society Organizations I-2 Media I-3 Public Access to Information II II-1 II-2 II-3 III III-1 III-2 III-3 III-4 IV IV-1 IV-2 IV-3 IV-4 Elections Voting & Citizen Participation Election Integrity Political Financing Government Accountability Executive Accountability Legislative Accountability Judicial Accountability Budget Processes Administration and Civil Service Civil Service Regulations Whistle-blowing Measures Procurement Privatization V Oversight and Regulatory Mechanisms V-1 National Ombudsman V-2 Supreme Audit Institution V-3 Taxes and Customs 6
7 V-4 Financial Sector Regulation V-5 Business Licensing and Regulation VI VI-1 VI-2 VI-3 VI-4 Anti-Corruption Mechanisms and Rule of Law Anti-Corruption Law Anti-Corruption Agency Rule of Law Law Enforcement Click here [hyperlink to Excel file provided by Global Integrity] to download the 2006 Integrity Indicators. Generating an Integrity Scorecard Each Integrity Indicator is scored directly by the lead social scientist and substantiated as far as possible with relevant references and additional comments. The data is relayed from the field to HQ via the internet using a password-protected web site. There are two general types of indicators: in law and in practice. All indicators, regardless of type, are scored on the same ordinal scale of 0 to 100 with zero being the worst possible score and 100 perfect. In law indicators provide an objective assessment of whether certain legal codes, fundamental rights, government institutions, and regulations exist. These de jure indicators are scored with a simple yes or no with yes receiving a 100 score and no receiving a zero. In practice indicators address de facto issues such as implementation, effectiveness enforcement, and citizen access. As these usually require a more informed and subjective assessment, these in practice indicators are scored along an ordinal scale of zero to 100 with possible scores at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100. Lead researchers are required to provide a reference to substantiate each of their scores. This may be an interview conducted with a knowledgeable individual, a website link to a relevant report, or the name of a specific law or institution, depending on the particular indicator. As an incredibly rich research tool we plan to expand and harmonize the types of references for each of the indicators in future iterations of the index. Lead researchers are also offered the opportunity to include additional comments to support their score and reference for a particular indicator. These are particularly useful in capturing the nuances of a particular situation, namely the Yes, but phenomenon which is often the reality in undertaking this type of research. Personality, language, and culture can all affect the interpretation of a particular indicator and the score assigned to it. To minimize this effect and maximize inter-coder reliability, Global Integrity, in consultation with the methodology advisory committee, developed a master codebook for scoring the 2006 Integrity Indicators. The Codebook anchors every single indicator and sub-indicator to a predefined set of criteria. In essence, the scoring 7
8 criteria guide the lead researcher by suggesting, If you see X on the ground, score this indicator in the following way. For binary yes/no in law indicators, scoring criteria are provided for both yes (100) and no (0) responses. For in practice indicators, scoring criteria are defined for each of the 100, 50, and 0 scores with 25 and 75 deliberately left undefined to serve as in between scoring options. The master Codebook is downloadable here [hyperlink to Excel file to be provided by Global Integrity]. In summary, a given indicator or sub-indicator has the following elements: Indicator question, provided by Global Integrity Indicator scoring criteria/coding, provided by Global Integrity Indicator score (either yes (100)/no (0) or ordinal scale of with steps at 25, 50, and 75), assigned by the lead researcher based on o References, provided by the lead researcher o Comments (optional), provided by the lead researcher o Reader review comments (optional), as provided through a blind peer review process (See more on the peer review process below.) Example of an Integrity Scorecard: A powerful tool for analysis The data presented in an Integrity Scorecard is a powerful and unique way to succinctly assess the strengths and weaknesses of a country s national integrity framework (i.e. the existence and effectiveness of the mechanisms in place to prevent abuses of power). The data can be used to prioritize governance challenges and allocate available resources in a more efficient manner, for instance to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, or tighten up transparency around political financing. Integrity Scorecards are also a valuable tool for grassroots advocates seeking to target their advocacy programs on key priority sectors. Generating the Global Integrity Index: A Tool for Cross-Country Analysis While it is important to stress that the strength of the Integrity Indicators is the Integrity Scorecard they generate for an individual country (which provides an in-depth diagnostic tool for users), Global Integrity is also able to generate scores across categories and countries and classify countries into an overall Global Integrity Index according to various performance bands. These may be useful tools for those wishing to compare countries overall performances against each another. The Global Integrity Index groups countries into five performance tiers generated from the scores assigned to the individual integrity indicators: Very strong (90-100) Strong (80-90) Moderate (70-80) Weak (60-70) Very Weak (Below 60) 8
9 For the purpose of producing the Global Integrity Index, a simple aggregation method is used that parallels the process for generating indicator, sub-category, and category scores for each country. Original indicator and sub-indicator values are assigned by the lead social scientist for the country (those scores are adjusted following the peer review process; see more below). Each indicator score is then averaged within its parent subcategory, which produces a subcategory score. The subcategory score is in turn averaged with the other subcategory scores in a parent category. Category scores are averaged to produce a country score which then falls into one of the above five groupings. Because some aspects of governance integrity are harder to measure definitively, some categories require a more complex matrix of questions than others. Thus, the categories are equally valued, even if some categories are derived from a more lengthy series of questions than others. Similarly, the subcategories are equally valued within their parent category. The same comparison cannot be made between subcategories in different parent categories. In other words, each score (sub-indicators, indicator, and so on) is equally weighted with its peers addressing the same topic. However, indicators from different categories are not equally weighted. Our approach of using equally valued concepts and adding subordinate elements as needed has produced score weightings that reflect the six main conceptual categories. Peer Review Process The importance of the peer review process cannot be overstated. Since Global Integrity utilizes an expert assessment approach to compile the Integrity Indicators and Reporter s Notebook, it is crucial that we employ quality control mechanisms to ensure that our data and reporting is as accurate and as balanced as possible. Individually contracted and carefully vetted readers, selected for their independence and expertise in particular countries, are asked to blindly review both the raw Reporter s Notebook and the raw Integrity Indicators using the same password protected website used to file the original data and reporting from the field. The blind review process ensures that readers are unrestrained in their commentary, which most likely adds to 9
10 frankness when commenting on the draft country report. Reader comments are used to interpret and in some cases adjust scores that reviewers identify as containing errors, bias, or out-of-date information. Score adjustments follow certain rules and generally require repetition (i.e. similar comments from several reviewers) or solid referencing of a factual dispute. See further details on this below (Final Index Scores). In reviewing the Reporter s Notebook for the country, readers are asked to consider the following: Is the Reporter s Notebook factually accurate? Is the Reporter s Notebook fair? Is anything misrepresented or unclear? Are there any significant events or developments that were not addressed? Reader comments on the Reporter s Notebook are captured in narrative, paragraph style and are published anonymously alongside the final Reporter s Notebook. For the Integrity Indicators, readers are asked to consider the following: Is the particular Indicator or Sub-indicator scored by the lead researcher factually accurate? Are there any significant events or developments that were not addressed? Does the Indicator or Sub-indicator offer a fair and balanced view of the anticorruption environment? Is the scoring consistent within the entire set or sub-set of Integrity Indicators? Is the scoring controversial or widely accepted? Is controversial scoring sufficiently sourced? Are the sources used reliable and reputable? The reader process for the data scorecard, like for that of the Reporter s Notebook, does not assign direct attribution of reader comments. This ensures that readers are unrestrained in their commentary. Reader comments on the country s data scorecard are included alongside the final scorecard and play an important role in final scoring adjustments prior to publication. For 2006, Global Integrity retained the services of approximately 130 readers for the 43 country assessments, with some readers reviewing a number of countries [hyperlink to the part of Who We Are page that lists the readers] Final Index Scores Global Integrity takes full and final responsibility for the scores contained in the Integrity Scorecard for each country and the Global Integrity Index. These scores are generated following an elaborate and collaborative review process that includes balancing information from several (sometimes conflicting) sources while being guided by the master codebook. 10
11 While Global Integrity makes every attempt to produce credible information we welcome all feedback on the veracity and accuracy of our data. Please Global Integrity with specific comments on indicator scores that you may not agree with, particularly with regard to factual accuracy. In generating the final Index, initial data (both scores and narrative) gathered by the lead social scientist underwent several interactive rounds of substantive review over and above stylistic revisions and copyediting. These four phases of the review process served to strengthen the integrity of the Index as a research tool. They may be summed up as follows: 1) Interpretation. The scoring committee reviewed commentary provided by the lead social scientist to ensure a uniform application of each indicator. Because highly specific questions are asked in diverse contexts, accurate application of a consistent approach is crucial to obtaining reliable data. This process involved dialogue with the lead social scientist and was repeated during later review stages. 2) Peer review. After editing and corrections based on interpretation, each dataset was posted online for comment from a panel of carefully selected researchers and journalists. These comments indicated which scores panelists disagreed with and included explanations for their dissent. The entire process was double-blind: The lead social scientists did not know who was reviewing their work, and the reviewers did not know on whose research they were commenting. Reader comments were used to interpret and in some cases adjust scores that reviewers identified as erroneous, biased, or out-of-date. In order to adjust a score, Global Integrity followed a number of rules, notably requiring similar comments from multiple reviewers and the provision of specific, solid references to settle disagreements over questions of fact. 3) Indicator evaluation. Based on feedback from the field teams and the double-blind peer reviews, several indicators were cut from the final report. Only indicators judged to be distinct, universally valid, and reliable were included in the final set of Integrity Indicators. 4) Intercoder reliability. Personality, language, and culture can all affect the relationship between the qualitative interpretation of a particular indicator and the score assigned to it. To minimize this effect, Global Integrity examined each indicator for consistency among scorers. Reviewing the codebook scoring criteria and reader comments, the scoring committee examined the full set of scores; in some cases, score adjustments were ultimately made to improve intercoder consistency. 11
Global Integrity Report: 2007
Global Integrity Report: 2007 Overview and Key Findings February 7, 2008 Brookings Institution Outline 1. Introduction 2. About Global Integrity 3. 2007 Global Integrity Fieldwork 4. 2007 Key Findings
More information2017 Social Progress Index
2017 Social Progress Index Central Europe Scorecard 2017. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited In this pack: 2017 Social Progress Index rankings Country scorecard(s) Spotlight on indicator
More informationWhich Countries are Most Likely to Qualify for the MCA? An Update using MCC Data. Steve Radelet 1 Center for Global Development April 22, 2004
Which Countries are Most Likely to Qualify for the MCA? An Update using MCC Data Steve Radelet 1 Center for Global Development April 22, 2004 The Millennium Challenge Corporation has posted data for each
More informationData access for development: The IPUMS perspective
Data access for development: The IPUMS perspective United Nations Commission on Population and Development Strengthening the demographic evidence base for the post-2015 development agenda New York 11 April
More informationOfficial development assistance of the Czech Republic (mil. USD) (according to the OECD DAC Statistical Reporting )
Official development assistance of the Czech Republic (mil. USD) (according to the OECD DAC Statistical Reporting ) Column1 ODA Total 219,63 210,88 212,15 199,00 I.A Bilateral ODA 66,44 57,04 62,57 70,10
More information2018 Social Progress Index
2018 Social Progress Index The Social Progress Index Framework asks universally important questions 2 2018 Social Progress Index Framework 3 Our best index yet The Social Progress Index is an aggregate
More informationGLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017
GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017 GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS Results from the World Economic Forum Executive Opinion Survey 2017 Survey and
More informationHow to Develop Assessment Tools for Standards of Professional Conduct: A Review of 78 Countries
How to Develop Assessment Tools for Standards of Professional Conduct: A Review of 78 Countries Presented by: April 14, 2007 Presented at: 2007 PREM Learning Week Civil Service Course April 20, 2007 Washington
More informationGlobal Integrity Report: 2010 Key Findings. EMBARGO Hold until May
Global Integrity Report: 2010 Key Findings Locally reported. Transparently sourced. 100% original data. A bottom-up scorecard of anti-corruption worldwide. EMBARGO Hold until May 4 2011 Anti-Corruption
More informationBank Guidance. Thresholds for procurement. approaches and methods by country. Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public
Bank Guidance Thresholds for procurement approaches and methods by country Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public Catalogue Number OPSPF5.05-GUID.48 Issued Effective July, 206 Retired August
More informationAUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25
19 July 2013 AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25 Australia is not the world s most generous country in its response to refugees but is just inside the top 25, according to
More informationWHO Global Task Force on TB Impact Measurement Progress update No.4 (January 2012)
WHO Global Task Force on TB Impact Measurement Progress update No.4 (January 2012) This is the fourth progress update from the Task Force, focusing on progress made in 2011 and activities coming up in
More informationReport on Countries That Are Candidates for Millennium Challenge Account Eligibility in Fiscal
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/01/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-18657, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 921103 MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
More informationTowards the 5x5 Objective: Setting Priorities for Action
Towards the 5x5 Objective: Setting Priorities for Action Global Remittances Working Group Meeting April 23, Washington DC Massimo Cirasino Head, Payment Systems Development Group The 5x5 Objective In many
More informationCzech Republic Development Cooperation in 2014
Czech Republic Development Cooperation in 2014 Development cooperation is an important part of the foreign policy of the Czech Republic aimed at contributing to the eradication of poverty in the context
More informationThe Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1
2016 Report Tracking Financial Inclusion The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1 Financial Inclusion Financial inclusion is an essential ingredient of economic development and poverty reduction
More informationGlobal Social Progress Index
Global Social Progress Index How do we advance society? Economic Development Social Progress www.socialprogressindex.com The Social Progress Imperative defines social progress as: the capacity of a society
More informationMeeting our Commitment to Democracy and Human Rights An Analysis of the U.S. Congressional FY2008 Appropriation
Meeting our Commitment to Democracy and Human Rights An Analysis of the U.S. Congressional FY2008 Appropriation May 2008 www.freedomhouse.org Meeting our Commitment to Democracy and Human Rights An Analysis
More informationKPMG: 2013 Change Readiness Index Assessing countries' ability to manage change and cultivate opportunity
KPMG: 2013 Change Readiness Index Assessing countries' ability to manage change and cultivate opportunity Graeme Harrison, Jacqueline Irving and Daniel Miles Oxford Economics The International Consortium
More informationGLOBAL INTEGRITY REPORT: Executive Summary EDITED BY GLOBAL INTEGRITY
GLOBAL INTEGRITY REPORT: 20 Executive Summary EDITED BY GLOBAL INTEGRITY GLOBAL INTEGRITY REPORT: 20 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Our work is donated to the public; anyone may share, quote from and build on this
More information2018 Global Law and Order
2018 Global Law and Order Copyright Standards This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted and trademarked materials of Gallup, Inc. Accordingly, international and domestic laws and penalties
More informationMillennium Profiles Demographic & Social Energy Environment Industry National Accounts Trade. Social indicators. Introduction Statistics
1 of 5 10/2/2008 10:16 AM UN Home Department of Economic and Social Affairs Economic and Social Development Home UN logo Statistical Division Search Site map About us Contact us Millennium Profiles Demographic
More informationControl of Corruption and the MCA: A Preview to the FY2008 Country Selection Sheila Herrling and Sarah Rose 1 October 16, 2007
Control of Corruption and the MCA: A Preview to the FY2008 Country Selection Sheila Herrling and Sarah Rose 1 October 16, 2007 The Millennium Challenge Corporation places a premium on good governance.
More informationMIND THE GAP. Gender Responsive Policies. Lorena Aguilar Global Senior Gender Adviser
MIND THE GAP Gender Responsive Policies Lorena Aguilar Global Senior Gender Adviser Of 143 economies - 90% have at least one law restricting economic equality for women 4% of chairs at World Energy Council
More information1 THICK WHITE SENTRA; SIDES AND FACE PAINTED TO MATCH WALL PAINT: GRAPHICS DIRECT PRINTED TO SURFACE; CLEAT MOUNT TO WALL CRITICAL INSTALL POINT
Map Country Panels 1 THICK WHITE SENTRA; SIDES AND FACE PAINTED TO MATCH WALL PAINT: GRAPHICS DIRECT PRINTED TO SURFACE; CLEAT MOUNT TO WALL CRITICAL INSTALL POINT GRAPHICS PRINTED DIRECT TO WHITE 1 THICK
More informationTISAX Activation List
TISAX Activation List ENX doc ID: 621 Version: 1.0 Date: 2017-02-07 Audience: TISAX Stakeholders Classification: Public Status: Mandatory ENXtract: List of Countries with special requirements for certain
More informationShares of data by source of information for the 2016 Global Report. edition
Annex I: Methodology and data coverage The quantitative and qualitative information that form the basis of the Global Report was collected by UNODC in two ways: through a dedicated questionnaire 1 distributed
More informationWorld Refugee Survey, 2001
World Refugee Survey, 2001 Refugees in Africa: 3,346,000 "Host" Country Home Country of Refugees Number ALGERIA Western Sahara, Palestinians 85,000 ANGOLA Congo-Kinshasa 12,000 BENIN Togo, Other 4,000
More informationIPUMS at the 58 th ISI ISI (Dublin, Aug 20-21, 21, 2011) IPUMS Workshop (Aug 20-21) 21)» STS065 Future of Microdata Ac
Welcome to the 11 th IPUMS-International International workshop: Dublin, Ireland, Aug 20-21, 21, 2011 *** Robert McCaa, Professor of population history University of Minnesota rmccaa@umn.edu for additional
More informationGal up 2017 Global Emotions
Gallup 2017 Global Emotions Copyright Standards This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted materials and literary property of Gallup, Inc. It is for the guidance of your organization only
More informationMechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle
Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle In the first year, a total of 29 reviews will be conducted.
More informationEvaluation Methodology
Appendix A Evaluation Methodology This appendix presents the detailed methodology for the different evaluation components. I. Selection of Evaluation Countries Selection of evaluation countries Countries
More informationThe National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.
Monthly statistics December 2017: Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders. The
More informationPer Capita Income Guidelines for Operational Purposes
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Per Capita Income Guidelines for Operational Purposes May 23, 2018. The per capita Gross National Income (GNI) guidelines covering the Civil Works
More informationFood Procurement. Annual Report. WFP Food Procurement January December January - December 2006
Food Procurement Annual Report WFP Food Procurement January December 2006 January - December 2006 Procurement Mission Statement To ensure that appropriate commodities are available to WFP beneficiaries
More informationEmbassies and Travel Documents Overview
Embassies and Travel Documents Overview Possible to obtain passport? Minimum processing time Adults with ID embassy turnaround times Adults who need to obtain ID / prove identity embassy turnaround times
More informationGovernance Matters IV: New Data, New Challenges. Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi 1 The World Bank May 2005
Governance Matters IV: New Data, New Challenges Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi 1 The World Bank May 2005 In a new study we present a set of governance indicators covering 209 countries
More informationRule of Law Index 2019 Insights
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights Highlights and data trends from the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Trinidad & Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom
More informationPerformance-based financing (PBF) to accelerate progress towards MDGs 4 and 5: What have we learned? Henrik Axelson (PMNCH) Daniel Kraushaar (MSH)
Performance-based financing (PBF) to accelerate progress towards MDGs 4 and 5: What have we learned? Henrik Axelson (PMNCH) Daniel Kraushaar (MSH) Women Deliver conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia May 29,
More informationACE GLOBAL A Snapshot
ACE GLOBAL A Snapshot FACTS Present in 46 countries worldwide Provide asset Management to 172 financial institutions Total assets in excess of US$ 9 billion More than 4,800 employees HISTORY ACE GLOBAL,
More informationMechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle
Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle In the first year, a total of 29 reviews will be conducted.
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D
HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D This fact sheet presents the latest UIS S&T data available as of July 2011. Regional density of researchers and their field of employment UIS Fact Sheet, August 2011, No. 13 In the
More informationUNDP Brown Bag Lunch 2 February 2009, New York. Katsuji Imata Deputy Secretary General-Programmes CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation
UNDP Brown Bag Lunch 2 February 2009, New York Katsuji Imata Deputy Secretary General-Programmes CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation What is CIVICUS? 1 CIVICUS Mission and Vision Mission:
More informationAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 1997
EMBARGOED UNTIL 0001 HRS GMT, WEDNESDAY 18 JUNE 1997 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 1997 Annual Report Statistics 1997 AI INDEX: POL 10/05/97 NOTE TO EDITORS: The following statistics on human rights abuses
More informationTranslation from Norwegian
Statistics for May 2018 Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 402 persons in May 2018, and 156 of these were convicted offenders. The NPIS is responsible
More informationThe World of Government WFP
The World of Government Partnerships @ WFP Induction Briefing for new EB Members Government Partnerships Division (PGG) 22 January 213 WFP s Collaborative Resourcing Roadmap : The Six Pillars Pillar I:
More informationCountry Participation
Country Participation IN ICP 2003 2006 The current round of the International Comparison Program is the most complex statistical effort yet providing comparable data for about 150 countries worldwide.
More informationFigure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016
Figure 2: Range of s, Global Gender Gap Index and es, 2016 Global Gender Gap Index Yemen Pakistan India United States Rwanda Iceland Economic Opportunity and Participation Saudi Arabia India Mexico United
More informationBY Amy Mitchell, Katie Simmons, Katerina Eva Matsa and Laura Silver. FOR RELEASE JANUARY 11, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:
FOR RELEASE JANUARY 11, 2018 BY Amy Mitchell, Katie Simmons, Katerina Eva Matsa and Laura Silver FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research Katie Simmons, Associate Director,
More informationFood Procurement 2007 Annual Report
Food Procurement 2007 Annual Report Procurement Mission Statement To ensure that appropriate commodities are available to WFP beneficiaries (operations) in a timely and cost-effective manner. Further to
More informationContracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention
Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention 14/12/2016 Number of Contracting Parties: 169 Country Entry into force Notes Albania 29.02.1996 Algeria 04.03.1984 Andorra 23.11.2012 Antigua and Barbuda 02.10.2005
More informationThe National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.
Statistics March 2018: Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders. The NPIS is responsible
More informationRegional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001
Regional Scores African countries Press Freedom 2001 Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cape Verde Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo (Brazzaville) Congo (Kinshasa) Cote
More informationDevelopment Cooperation
Development Cooperation Development is much more than the transition from poverty to wealth. Certainly economic improvement is one goal, but equally important are the enhancement of human dignity and security,
More informationGeoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita
G E O T E R M S Read Sections 1 and 2. Then create an illustrated dictionary of the Geoterms by completing these tasks: Create a symbol or an illustration to represent each term. Write a definition of
More informationIncome and Population Growth
Supplementary Appendix to the paper Income and by Markus Brueckner and Hannes Schwandt November 2013 downloadable from: https://sites.google.com/site/markusbrucknerresearch/research-papers Table of Contents
More informationInternational Campaign to Ban Landmines Cluster Munition Coalition Campaign Action Plan
International Campaign to Ban Landmines Cluster Munition Coalition 2016 Campaign Action Plan 1 Table of Contents I) Executive Summary... Error! Bookmark not defined. II) No more use of landmines or cluster
More informationREINVENTION WITH INTEGRITY
REINVENTION WITH INTEGRITY Using the UN Convention against Corruption as a Basis for Good Governance Regional Forum on Reinventing Government in Asia Jakarta, Indonesia November, 2007 The Integrity Irony
More informationCountry pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption
Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption In the first year, a total of 29 reviews will be conducted.
More informationGovernance and growth go together. Growth of GDP per capita, (%) 10
Introduction M easuring governance The breakup of the Soviet Union and the emergence of democracies in many developing countries have increased interest in governance. Good governance, strong institutions,
More informationCountry pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption
Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption In year 1, a total of 29 reviews will be conducted: Regional
More information2013 Political Risk Map
2013 Political Risk Map March 2013 Aon Risk Solutions Global Broking Centre Crisis Management Interactive Map 2013 Political Risk Map History and general overview: Leading the industry for 15 years Aon
More informationPanel 3 New Metrics for Assessing Human Rights and How These Metrics Relate to Development and Governance
Panel 3 New Metrics for Assessing Human Rights and How These Metrics Relate to Development and Governance David Cingranelli, Professor of Political Science, SUNY Binghamton CIRI Human Rights Data Project
More informationThe World s Most Generous Countries
The World s Most Generous Countries Copyright Standards This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted and trademarked materials of Gallup, Inc. Accordingly, international and domestic laws and
More informationASYLUM STATISTICS MONTHLY REPORT
ASYLUM STATISTICS MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2016 January 2016: asylum statistics refer to the number of persons instead of asylum cases Until the end of 2015, the statistics published by the CGRS referred
More information=======================================================================
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)] [Notices] [Pages 47618-47619] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: E9-22306]
More informationReturn of convicted offenders
Monthly statistics December : Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 869 persons in December, and 173 of these were convicted offenders. The NPIS forcibly
More informationCharting Cambodia s Economy, 1H 2017
Charting Cambodia s Economy, 1H 2017 Designed to help executives interpret economic numbers and incorporate them into company s planning. Publication Date: January 3 rd, 2017 HELPING EXECUTIVES AROUND
More informationA Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference
A Partial Solution To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference Some of our most important questions are causal questions. 1,000 5,000 10,000 50,000 100,000 10 5 0 5 10 Level of Democracy ( 10 = Least
More informationGood Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-
Directions: AP Human Geography Summer Assignment Ms. Abruzzese Part I- You are required to find, read, and write a description of 5 current events pertaining to a country that demonstrate the IMPORTANCE
More informationDelays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.
Monthly statistics December 2013: Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 483 persons in December 2013. 164 of those forcibly returned in December 2013
More informationDevelopment Cooperation of the Czech Republic in 2015
Development Cooperation of the Czech Republic in 2015 Development cooperation is an important part of foreign policy of the Czech Republic. It promotes security, stability, prosperity and sustainable development
More informationProgress For People Through People: Perspectives from CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation
Progress For People Through People: Perspectives from CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation Katsuji Imata Deputy Secretary General-Programmes OECD World Forum, Busan, Korea, 27 October 2009
More informationThe NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.
Monthly statistics December 2014: Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 532 persons in December 2014. 201 of these returnees had a criminal conviction
More informationDiaspora Bonds for Education
Diaspora Bonds for Education Suhas Ketkar Vanderbilt University & Dilip Ratha The World Bank Diaspora Bonds: Introduction Definition: Bonds issued by a country to its own Diaspora to tap in their wealth
More informationCUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT, AMENDMENT OF SCHEDULE NO. 2 (NO. 2/3/5)
Government Gazette No. 41038 No. R.829 CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT, 1964. AMENDMENT OF SCHEDULE NO. 2 (NO. 2/3/5) Date: 2017-08-11 In terms of section 57 of the Customs and Excise Act, 1964, Part 3 of Schedule
More informationFP2020 CATALYZING COLLABORATION ESTIMATE TABLES
FP2020 CATALYZING COLLABORATION 2017-2018 ESTIMATE TABLES CORE INDICATORS 2-3 NO. 1: Number of additional users of modern methods of contraception 4-5 NO. 2: Modern contraceptive prevalence rate, MCPR
More informationHuman Resources in R&D
NORTH AMERICA AND WESTERN EUROPE EAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE SOUTH AND WEST ASIA LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ARAB STATES SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA CENTRAL ASIA 1.8% 1.9% 1. 1. 0.6%
More informationPartnering to Accelerate Social Progress Presentation to Swedish Sustainability Forum Umea, 14 June 2017
Partnering to Accelerate Social Progress Presentation to Swedish Sustainability Forum Umea, 14 June 2017 Social Progress Index Framework Why SPI? GDP provides an incomplete picture of human and societal
More informationGlobal Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region
Country Year of Data Collection Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region National /Regional Survey Size Age Category % BMI 25-29.9 %BMI 30+ % BMI 25- %BMI 30+ 29.9 European Region Albania
More informationThe National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.
Monthly statistics August 2018 Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders. The NPIS is responsible
More informationIOM International Organization for Migration OIM Organisation Internationale pour les Migrations IOM Internationale Organisatie voor Migratie REAB
IOM International Organization for Migration OIM Organisation Internationale pour les Migrations IOM Internationale Organisatie voor Migratie REAB Return and Emigration of Asylum Seekers ex Belgium Statistical
More informationIdentifying Emerging Markets using UK NARIC data. Ian Bassett Head of Commercial Group UK NARIC
Identifying Emerging Markets using UK NARIC data Ian Bassett Head of Commercial Group UK NARIC Contents What is an emerging market? Emerging market key considerations Education & Emerging Markets Emerging
More informationSEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD
SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD No one likes to dwell on lay-offs and terminations, but severance policies are a major component of every HR department s
More informationBuilding an Identification Ecosystem for Africa The World Bank s Sub-Regional Identification for Development Projects
Building an Identification Ecosystem for Africa The World Bank s Sub-Regional Identification for Development Projects Laura Rawlings, World Bank ID4Africa Forum April 2017 CONTEXT: IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT
More informationCountry pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption
Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption YEAR 1 Group of African States Zambia Zimbabwe Italy Uganda Ghana
More informationThe Democracy Ranking 2008/2009 of the Quality of Democracy: Method
The Democracy Ranking 2008/2009 of the Quality of Democracy: Method and Ranking Outcome David F. J. Campbell Georg Pölzlbauer February 23, 2009 David F. J. Campbell Research Fellow University of Klagenfurt
More informationSex ratio at birth (converted to female-over-male ratio) Ratio: female healthy life expectancy over male value
Table 2: Calculation of weights within each subindex Economic Participation and Opportunity Subindex per 1% point change Ratio: female labour force participation over male value 0.160 0.063 0.199 Wage
More informationVACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD
VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD AT A GLANCE ORDER ONLINE GEOGRAPHY 47 COUNTRIES COVERED 5 REGIONS 48 MARKETS Americas Asia Pacific
More informationPersonnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat
International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors General Conference GOV/2005/54-GC(49)/4 Date: 9 August 2005 General Distribution Original: English For official use only Item 7(b)(i) of the Board's
More informationTI s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
ADB-OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific 5th regional anti-corruption conference Beijing, September 28-30, 2005 How can public opinion surveys assist in preparing anti-corruption reform?
More informationPress release 9th January 2019 For immediate release
Press release 9th January 2019 For immediate release Democratic advances, and a long way to go Asia in The EIU's 2018 Democracy Index Since we began producing the Democracy Index, Asia and Australasia
More informationThe 2017 TRACE Matrix Bribery Risk Matrix
The 2017 TRACE Matrix Bribery Risk Matrix Methodology Report Corruption is notoriously difficult to measure. Even defining it can be a challenge, beyond the standard formula of using public position for
More informationPolitical Party Strengthening Toolkit Political Participation and Representation Programme
Political Party Strengthening Toolkit - 2018 Political Participation and Representation Programme info@idea.int Through guides, training modules, databases and digital tools, International IDEA supports
More informationA National Security Education Program Initiative Administered by the Institute of International Education
A National Security Education Program Initiative Administered by the Institute of International Education National Security Education Act Authored by Senator David L. Boren Originally Established in 1991
More informationTAKING HAPPINESS SERIOUSLY
TAKING HAPPINESS SERIOUSLY FLACSO-INEGI seminar Mexico City, April 18, 2013 John Helliwell Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and Vancouver School of Economics, UBC In collaboration with Shun Wang,
More informationMigrant Workers & Trade Union Membership. Survey Findings
Migrant Workers & Trade Union Membership Survey Findings June 2016 Published in June 2016. Doras Luimní Central Buildings 51 O Connell Street Limerick Tel: 061310328 Email: info@dorasluimni.org Web: www.dorasluimni.org
More informationDiplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities
E VIP/DC/7 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: JUNE 21, 2013 Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities Marrakech,
More informationA Foundation for Dialogue on Freedom in Africa
A Foundation for Dialogue on dom in Africa Sub-Saharan Africa in 007 presents at the same time some of the most promising examples of new democracies in the world places where leaders who came to power
More informationFREEDOM ON THE NET 2011: GLOBAL GRAPHS
1 FREEDOM ON THE NET 2011: GLOBAL GRAPHS 37-COUNTRY SCORE COMPARISON (0 Best, 100 Worst) * A green-colored bar represents a status of Free, a yellow-colored one, the status of Partly Free, and a purple-colored
More information