Thom Brooks University of Newcastle, UK
|
|
- Kathleen Holland
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Equality and democracy: the problem of minimal competency * Thom Brooks University of Newcastle, UK ABSTRACT. In a recent article, Thomas Christiano defends the intrinsic justice of democracy grounded in the principle of equal consideration of interests. Each citizen is entitled to a single vote, equal in weight to all other citizens. The problem with this picture is that all citizens must meet a threshold of minimal competence. My argument is that Christiano is wrong to claim a minimum threshold of competency is fully consistent with the principle of equality. While standards of minimal competency may be justifiable, these standards justify political inequality. This paper explores the relationship between equality and democracy in terms of minimal competency, demonstrating how minimal competency is justified and why it is inegalitarian in interesting ways. KEYWORDS. Children, Thomas Christiano, Robert Dahl, democracy, equality, egalitarianism Thomas Christiano defends the intrinsic justice of democracy grounded in the principle of equal consideration of interests. 1 This intrinsic justice is foremost expressed in the doctrine that each citizen is entitled to a single vote, equal in weight to all other citizens. 2 I agree with Christiano that this conception of justice may require equality in say despite differences in competence as long as individuals meet a threshold of minimum competence. 3 That is, we both agree that voters must satisfy a minimum threshold of competency prior to electoral participation. However, I do not hold as Christiano does that the requirement of a minimum threshold of competency is fully commensurable with the principle of equality: this threshold guarantees the political inequality of some * I am most grateful to Ger Casey, Fabian Freyenhagen, John Hymers, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments. ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES: JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ETHICS NETWORK 14, no. 1 (2007): by European Centre for Ethics, K.U.Leuven. All rights reserved. doi: /EP
2 ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES MARCH 2007 persons, either de facto or in truth. Instead, I argue that standards of minimal competency may well be just, but these standards create political inequality. The importance of demonstrating the problems with Christiano s account are simple. Many democratic theorists argue that minimal competence is not incommensurable with political equality, a view put forward forcefully and persuasively by Christiano s recent work. Whilst my discussion centres on his work, the implications for democratic theory extend far beyond it. Christiano defends a just system of governance where: (P1) No one s good is more important than anyone else s. (P2) No one s interest matters more than anyone else s. (P3) Each person has a life to live and the interests of each person are combined into a special unity within that life. (C1) Thus, the principle of equal consideration of interest requires that the interests of individuals be equally advanced in terms of lifetime prospects. 4 The only political system that satisfies these conditions is democracy. 5 Indeed, Christiano defends a version of modern, liberal, representative democracy where no particular conception of the good exists beyond those goods that individuals deem best for themselves. 6 Society cannot dictate what the good is simply by requiring consensus on principles of justice, even if these decisions were limited to reasonable citizens. 7 Instead, he advocates a principle of respect for the judgement of each citizen, treating all citizens as having something to say and of being worthy of being listened to and responded to. 8 As a result, the equal consideration of each citizen is respected despite the views of some prevailing over others. 9 Christiano s principle of respect for the judgement of each citizen only requires responsiveness to those who satisfy a minimum of competence in 4
3 T. BROOKS EQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY moral reflection. 10 Those citizens who possess competence deserve equal consideration for their political judgements. Those who fail to satisfy minimum standards of competence are justifiably excluded from holding equal political rights stemming from citizenship. Thus, the ability to form facts of judgement is crucial for political participation. 11 Persons who can form such a judgement adequately (a) reflect on ideas of justice, (b) voice ideas that reflect their true interests, (c) learn by appealing to conceptions of principles, and (d ) understand what is at issue in policy debates. Possession of minimal competence makes possible the ability to form such a judgement and, thus, only those who have minimal competence can participate fully in democratic affairs. In addition, Christiano says: If the facts of judgement do not hold for some group of people, then there is no basis within a welfarist theory of thinking that failure to respond to a person s judgements is an injustice to them. 12 The implications are, on the one hand, that persons of sufficient competence have rights to an equal consideration of their political judgements such that failure for the state to do this is itself an injustice to them. On the other hand, not only do persons of insufficient competence lack rights to an equal consideration of their political judgements, but it is not an injustice for the state to be dismissive of these judgements. The latter are in a position of political inferiority to the former. Interestingly, Christiano rejects so-called normative epistemic authoritarianism because he does not accept that someone can legitimate his power on the basis of being in possession of superior wisdom. 13 On the contrary, he adheres to what he considers just standards of minimal competence, whose direct consequence is that those who fail to satisfy these standards shall be governed by those who possess competence. 14 In fact, Christiano rejects this brand of authoritarianism because of the difficulty in determining a criteria of sufficient reasonableness for political participation and yet his own standard of minimal competence is precisely such a criteria. Indeed, the satisfaction of minimal competence is itself sufficient reasonableness for democratic participation. 5
4 ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES MARCH 2007 Those of insufficient competence conveniently fall into at least one of two groups: children or the mentally disabled. Christiano says: Children and those who are severely mentally disabled do not have full liberal or democratic rights because they are not capable of assessing the significance of their actions for their own interests or the interests of others, nor can they grasp the limits of those rights. 15 The withholding of rights to full democratic participation is based upon a lack of competence not due to physical or social status. Thus, the fact that one is a child or mentally disabled is not itself a reason to deny voting privileges. Instead, a person s incapacity to comprehend adequately his or her personal and interpersonal rights is a reason to deny these privileges. While it may well be quite difficult to determine who possesses minimal standards of competence, it is rather easier to determine who is a child or a mentally disabled person. 16 Indeed, there are advantages to using age, for example, as a means of determining minimal standards of competence as age requirements are more or less common and uncontroversial grounds in every country... for limiting the right of citizens to vote. 17 Crucially, Christiano commits himself to standards of competency, not standards of age requirements. For this strategy to work, all children should be expected to lack competency. Children who possess competency should any exist ought to be granted full rights of participation. Moreover, adults who lack competency possess illegitimate rights of participation. Indeed, Christiano believes that all sane adults satisfy demands of competence in virtue of their being sane adults. 18 A number of studies of both electoral politics and public opinion suggest that not all sane adults would possess competence. 19 Moreover, Christiano recognizes that the fallibility of moral judgement is pervasive, even when confined to parameters set by his principle of equality. While he admits that individuals are rarely able to give as much as rough sketches of their own interests in social life as well as their relationship 6
5 T. BROOKS EQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY with fellow citizens, Christiano argues that it would be perverse and often self-defeating to rule out of court the judgements of those who disagree with one [intelligent person] on matters of justice. 20 The difficulty is that most people would be unable to provide competent moral judgements, owing to a corresponding inability to give more than a mere rough sketch of their own interests let alone the interests of others. The solution, for Christiano, seems to be that the great difficulty of governments making justified moral judgements will simply even itself out through democratic governance, rather than accelerate the problem. Thus, Christiano uses social status based upon age to determine who has full rights to political participation and not a standard of minimal competence, contrary to precisely what he claims to defend. Of course, it would be foolhardy to suggest that only democracies exclude children from full political participation, on whatever grounds. Robert Mayer notes: All regimes, democratic or not, exclude children from the demos, and they do so on the paternalistic ground of unequal competence. What makes authoritarian regimes different is that they often exclude sizable groups of adult subjects from power for the same reason that children are excluded. 21 In other words, all systems of governance exclude children from full participation for failure to satisfy demands of minimal competence. This is not necessarily an argument to continue to do so, but it points to a fact of political organization. The major difference between democracies and authoritarian governments on this view is that the latter excludes large numbers of adults from full participation for their failure to satisfy standards of minimal competence. Mayer suggests that a democracy may still legitimately exclude adults from full participation for lack of competence, as long as the number of adults is not sizable. 22 Mayer s position would exclude persons lacking competence from full participation similarly to Christiano. The major difference is that Mayer suggests competence, not age 7
6 ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES MARCH 2007 qualifications, ought to be the deciding factor, although it privileges adults over children. 23 On the other hand, Christiano seems to do just the opposite, privileging age over competence. Christiano s argument is a bit sloppy as he argues both (a) that children and the mentally disabled ought to be excluded from full rights of political participation due to lack of competency and (b) that each adult is denied the recognition of her moral personality whenever her judgement about that society is never taken seriously by others is treated in effect like a child or madman. 24 This second claim is that an adult citizen must have an equal share in political judgement making in order for her political judgement to be taken seriously. The claim may well be true, but it categorically denies the right of moral personality recognition to children and the mentally disabled. The recognition of one s moral personality by others seems to be both a fundamental right of all persons and an argument for political equality. Only adults should enjoy full recognition on grounds of political equality, not because they all possess minimal competence. Children are assumed to lack minimal competence and, thus, they are denied full recognition. Christiano wants to link full recognition of moral personality to those who possess minimal competence. Instead, we find full recognition based upon age, not competence. As a result, his arguments in favour of (a) and (b) are incompatible. A final point is worth raising at this point. Christiano s support of minimal competency qualifications to determine simply who is entitled to fully participate politically is only a claim about who should and who should not fully participate in democratic life. It is not a claim in support of empowering further those of particularly superior competence over those with average competence. He says: We have rejected the idea that competence rankings can justify unequal responses to citizens; still, competence rankings play an important role in the organization of society... In a complex society with a division of labour we need to have a way to choose who is to perform each task. The optimal division of labour is one in which each task is performed by the most competent at that task. In addition, we often need advisors 8
7 T. BROOKS EQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY who are reliable guides to truth. The most reliable guides to truth are the best advisors. Furthermore, we must sometimes choose partners in joint ventures and it is important that we choose competent partners because we have to live with the results. So competence rankings play a very important role in social organization. And this holds for moral competence as well. 25 While there are a number of substantive issues raised beyond the limited scope of this article, is it worth asking if, as Christiano purports to believe, (a) competence rankings have an important role in social organization, (b) we live in a complex society whose optimal division of labour necessitates having only the most competent perform tasks in which they are most competent, and (c) the importance of competence rankings holds for moral competence as well. Such views clearly suggest that persons of particular competence ought to participate in moral and political decision-making more substantively than those of less competence. Indeed, if competence rankings have an important role, namely, in determining who is most competent to perform complex tasks of political governance, then we might think that those with greater competence ought to have a special place in democratic governance: we should accept some degree of political inequality as justified. 26 Nevertheless, Christiano rejects proportional power distribution beyond a separation of those who can fully participate and those who cannot. 27 It is not the purpose of this article to reject the principle of minimal standards of competence. Nor do I want to suggest that only democracies deny children equal rights of citizenship granted most adults. 28 Instead, I agree with Christiano that liberal democracies do, in fact, demand the satisfaction of minimal standards of competency for full political participation. What I do reject is the argument that a democracy can both demand minimal competence and possess political equality at one and the same time. Unless all citizens meet these standards, then political inequality will exist in some variety. Indeed, political inequality is a likely consequence of holding any such standards and Christiano is not adverse to 9
8 ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES MARCH 2007 such a view, given his argument that no child or mentally disabled will be satisfactorily competent. This inequality between adults and children need not be considered an injustice, if standards of competence are applied justly. Thus, democracy may still possess political equality amongst the many that possess minimal competence. The main problem with Christiano s views is that they fail to satisfy his own demands of democratic equality. In fact, he offers a defence of justified political inequality. The view that democracies are governments where everyone is equal is common to most democratic theorists. This view sits uncomfortably with a second position that only adults should enjoy full participation in democratic life. The virtue of Christiano s work is that he best exemplifies an interesting and persuasive account of how these two positions might be harmonized. My task has been to argue that the tension between equal participation and restriction of participation to adults is problematic insofar as we claim that rights to equal participation rest upon possession of minimal competence for full political participation. Indeed, there is reason to think that some adults will fail this standard and some children (especially those close to eighteen years in age) will satisfy the standard, while allowed or denied full participation because of their age, not competence. I believe that minimal competence is an appropriate standard for full political participation, although its use may deny an appropriate degree of autonomy and it is very difficult to see how any relevant test might be employed. Such reservations then tell against such a standard. If these reservations have some weight, then perhaps we should avoid speaking of minimal competence as a standard for full political participation after all contra Christiano and others. NOTES 1. Thomas Christiano, Knowledge and Power in the Justification of Democracy, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2001): 198. See my Can We Justify Political Inequality? Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 89(3) (2003): for more extended criticisms of this paper. 10
9 T. BROOKS EQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY 2. See Robert Dahl, On Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), p Christiano, Knowledge and Power, Ibid., Ibid., For criticism of this view, see my A Defence of Sceptical Authoritarianism, Politics 22(3) (2002): and Can We Justify Political Inequality? 7. Ibid., Ibid., 204. Mayer alerts us to the fact that [p]olitical equality is premised not only on equal competence but on equal stake, the assumption that each is equally interested in, and equally affected by, decisions of the association. (Robert Mayer, Strategies of Justification in Authoritarian Ideology, Journal of Political Ideologies 6 (2001): 151). 9. See Dahl, On Demcoracy, Christiano, Knowledge and Power, Ibid., 207. Political participation seems to be limited to a right to vote in democratically held elections. 12. Ibid., Ibid., 199. See David Estlund, Making Truth Safe for Democracy in David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John Roemer (eds.), The Idea of Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993): In addition, representative democracies will create a fracture within those of sufficient competence, giving representatives a greater say in political judgement making than the represented whose say appears limited to a right to vote. (See my Can We Justify Political Inequality? and Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes, Elections and Representation, in Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999): 50). 15. Christiano, Knowledge and Power, 200 and see ibid., 202. Christiano cites at 200n12 Daniel Wickler, Dan Brock, and Allen Buchanan. (See Daniel Wickler, Paternalism and the Mildly Retarded, in Rolf Sartorius (ed.), Paternalism (Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1983) and Dan Brock and Allen Buchanan, Deciding for Others (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).) See also Tamar Schapiro, What is a Child? Ethics 109 (1999): This task is often achieved by defining a child as someone under a certain age limit and defining a mentally disabled person as someone under a certain IQ. 17. Richard Rose, Elections and Electoral Systems: Choices and Alternatives. In Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler (eds.), Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983): Christiano, Knowledge and Power, See David Austen-Smith and William H. Riker, Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation, American Political Science Review 81 (1987): ; David Austen-Smith and William H. Riker, Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation: A Correction, American Political Science Review 84 (1989): ; Richard R. Lau and David P. Redlawsk, Voting Correctly, American Political Science Review 91 (1997): ; and William H. Riker, Liberalism Against Populism (San Francisco: Freeman, 1982). On similar conclusions from studies in 11
10 ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES MARCH 2007 public opinion, see José María Maravell, Accountability and Manipulation, in Przeworski, et al, Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, p. 178 and John Zaller, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992). 20. Christiano, Knowledge and Power, Mayer, Strategies of Justification in Authoritarian Ideology, If a democratic government did exclude a large number of adults because of political competency, it might be argued that the competency tests are unfair. 23. This is a strategy I would defend, however difficult it would be in practice to implement it. See my Intenciolnálne novy zpusob myslení o volbách, Filosoficky Casopis 52 (2004): (reprinted in English as An Intentionally New Way of Thinking about Voting, Review Journal of Political Philosophy 3 (2005): 1-7). 24. Christiano, Knowledge and Power, 206. Regrettably, the traditional political discourse often uses madman and mentally disabled person interchangeably. 25. Christiano, Knowledge and Power, See my Plato, Hegel, and Democracy, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, forthcoming. 27. See Christiano, Knowledge and Power, See Mayer, Strategies of Justification in Authoritarian Ideology,
DEMOCRACY AND EQUALITY
The Philosophical Quarterly 2007 ISSN 0031 8094 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.495.x DEMOCRACY AND EQUALITY BY STEVEN WALL Many writers claim that democratic government rests on a principled commitment
More informationPhil 290, February 8, 2011 Christiano, The Constitution of Equality, Ch. 2 3
Phil 290, February 8, 2011 Christiano, The Constitution of Equality, Ch. 2 3 A common world is a set of circumstances in which the fulfillment of all or nearly all of the fundamental interests of each
More informationJus in Bello through the Lens of Individual Moral Responsibility: McMahan on Killing in War
(2010) 1 Transnational Legal Theory 121 126 Jus in Bello through the Lens of Individual Moral Responsibility: McMahan on Killing in War David Lefkowitz * A review of Jeff McMahan, Killing in War (Oxford
More informationA New Proposal on Special Majority Voting 1 Christian List
C. List A New Proposal on Special Majority Voting Christian List Abstract. Special majority voting is usually defined in terms of the proportion of the electorate required for a positive decision. This
More informationProblems with the one-person-one-vote Principle
Problems with the one-person-one-vote Principle [Please note this is a very rough draft. A polished and complete draft will be uploaded closer to the Congress date]. In this paper, I highlight some normative
More informationIntroduction. Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes
Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes Introduction The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most
More informationDemocracy and Common Valuations
Democracy and Common Valuations Philip Pettit Three views of the ideal of democracy dominate contemporary thinking. The first conceptualizes democracy as a system for empowering public will, the second
More informationProblems in Contemporary Democratic Theory
Kevin Elliott KJE2106@Columbia.edu Office Hours: Wednesday 4-6, IAB 734 POLS S3310 Summer 2014 (Session D) Problems in Contemporary Democratic Theory This course considers central questions in contemporary
More informationComment on Baker's Autonomy and Free Speech
University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2011 Comment on Baker's Autonomy and Free Speech T.M. Scanlon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm
More informationEthics Handout 18 Rawls, Classical Utilitarianism and Nagel, Equality
24.231 Ethics Handout 18 Rawls, Classical Utilitarianism and Nagel, Equality The Utilitarian Principle of Distribution: Society is rightly ordered, and therefore just, when its major institutions are arranged
More informationWhy Majority Rule Cannot Be Based only on Procedural Equality*raju_
446 113..122113..122 Ratio Juris. Vol. 23 No. 1 March 2010 (113 22) Why Majority Rule Cannot Be Based only on Procedural Equality*raju_ BEN SAUNDERS Sadurski (2008) takes the value of political equality
More informationProceduralism and Epistemic Value of Democracy
1 Paper to be presented at the symposium on Democracy and Authority by David Estlund in Oslo, December 7-9 2009 (Draft) Proceduralism and Epistemic Value of Democracy Some reflections and questions on
More informationCriminal Justice Without Moral Responsibility: Addressing Problems with Consequentialism Dane Shade Hannum
51 Criminal Justice Without Moral Responsibility: Addressing Problems with Consequentialism Dane Shade Hannum Abstract: This paper grants the hard determinist position that moral responsibility is not
More informationIncentives and the Natural Duties of Justice
Politics (2000) 20(1) pp. 19 24 Incentives and the Natural Duties of Justice Colin Farrelly 1 In this paper I explore a possible response to G.A. Cohen s critique of the Rawlsian defence of inequality-generating
More informationYour use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
International Phenomenological Society Review: What's so Rickety? Richardson's Non-Epistemic Democracy Reviewed Work(s): Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy by Henry S. Richardson
More informationPolitical equality, wealth and democracy
1 Political equality, wealth and democracy Wealth, power and influence are often mentioned together as symbols of status and prestige. Yet in a democracy, they can make an unhappy combination. If a democratic
More informationEdinburgh Research Explorer
Edinburgh Research Explorer Against a Minimum Voting Age Citation for published version: Cook, P 2013, 'Against a Minimum Voting Age' Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol
More informationIs Rawls s Difference Principle Preferable to Luck Egalitarianism?
Western University Scholarship@Western 2014 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2014 Is Rawls s Difference Principle Preferable to Luck Egalitarianism? Taylor C. Rodrigues Western University,
More informationWhat Is Unfair about Unequal Brute Luck? An Intergenerational Puzzle
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-00053-5 What Is Unfair about Unequal Brute Luck? An Intergenerational Puzzle Simon Beard 1 Received: 16 November 2017 /Revised: 29 May 2018 /Accepted: 27 December 2018
More informationPhilosophy 267 Fall, 2010 Professor Richard Arneson Introductory Handout revised 11/09 Texts: Course requirements: Week 1. September 28.
1 Philosophy 267 Fall, 2010 Professor Richard Arneson Introductory Handout revised 11/09 Class meets Tuesdays 1-4 in the Department seminar room. My email: rarneson@ucsd.edu This course considers some
More informationPart 1B Paper 7: Political Philosophy - Democracy Lecture 1: Justifications for democracy. Chris Thompson
Part 1B Paper 7: Political Philosophy - Democracy Lecture 1: Justifications for democracy Chris Thompson cjt68@cam.ac.uk 1 Overview of the lectures 1. Jus>fica>ons for democracy 2. Epistemic democracy
More informationControversy Liberalism, Democracy and the Ethics of Votingponl_
, 223 227 Controversy Liberalism, Democracy and the Ethics of Votingponl_1359 223..227 Annabelle Lever London School of Economics This article summarises objections to compulsory voting developed in my
More informationThe Great Debate Handbook. Name
The Great Debate Handbook Name Freedom Equality Unity Diversity Law Ethics Common Wealth Private Wealth Period # (Beaulieu- Social Studies) The Great Debate Key Vocabulary Key Terms citizens people who
More informationGLOBAL DEMOCRACY THE PROBLEM OF A WRONG PERSPECTIVE
GLOBAL DEMOCRACY THE PROBLEM OF A WRONG PERSPECTIVE XIth Conference European Culture (Lecture Paper) Ander Errasti Lopez PhD in Ethics and Political Philosophy UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA GLOBAL DEMOCRACY
More informationThe UK General Election 2017
The UK General Election 2017 Supporting people who have learning disabilities to vote A guide for family carers and supporters This guide answers some common questions about how to approach the UK General
More informationGreat comments! (A lot of them could be germs of term papers )
Phil 290-1: Political Rule February 3, 2014 Great comments! (A lot of them could be germs of term papers ) Some are about the positive view that I sketch at the end of the paper. We ll get to that in two
More informationJustice and collective responsibility. Zoltan Miklosi. regardless of the institutional or other relations that may obtain among them.
Justice and collective responsibility Zoltan Miklosi Introduction Cosmopolitan conceptions of justice hold that the principles of justice are properly applied to evaluate the situation of all human beings,
More informationA Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting : Some Reasons for Scepticism.
1 A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting : Some Reasons for Scepticism. Annabelle Lever Department of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science (annabelle@alever.net) Justine Lacroix
More informationEducational Adequacy, Educational Equality, and Ideal Theory. Jaime Ahlberg. University of Wisconsin Madison
Educational Adequacy, Educational Equality, and Ideal Theory Jaime Ahlberg University of Wisconsin Madison Department of Philosophy University of Wisconsin - Madison 5185 Helen C. White Hall 600 North
More informationDemocracy As Equality
1 Democracy As Equality Thomas Christiano Society is organized by terms of association by which all are bound. The problem is to determine who has the right to define these terms of association. Democrats
More informationDEMOCRACY, JUDICIAL REVIEW AND DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE
DEMOCRACY, JUDICIAL REVIEW AND DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE Dean Machin* Abstract Jeremy Waldron claims to have identified the core of the case against judicial review. He argues that as citizens have fundamental
More informationWe the Stakeholders: The Power of Representation beyond Borders? Clara Brandi
REVIEW Clara Brandi We the Stakeholders: The Power of Representation beyond Borders? Terry Macdonald, Global Stakeholder Democracy. Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States, Oxford, Oxford University
More informationLibertarianism. Polycarp Ikuenobe A N I NTRODUCTION
Libertarianism A N I NTRODUCTION Polycarp Ikuenobe L ibertarianism is a moral, social, and political doctrine that considers the liberty of individual citizens the absence of external restraint and coercion
More informationPolitics between Philosophy and Democracy
Leopold Hess Politics between Philosophy and Democracy In the present paper I would like to make some comments on a classic essay of Michael Walzer Philosophy and Democracy. The main purpose of Walzer
More informationPOLITICAL AUTHORITY AND PERFECTIONISM: A RESPONSE TO QUONG
SYMPOSIUM POLITICAL LIBERALISM VS. LIBERAL PERFECTIONISM POLITICAL AUTHORITY AND PERFECTIONISM: A RESPONSE TO QUONG JOSEPH CHAN 2012 Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), Vol. 2, No. 1 (2012): pp.
More informationAMY GUTMANN: THE CONSTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF COMMUNITARIAN VALUES DOES GUTMANN SUCCEED IN SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF COMMUNITARIAN VALUES?
AMY GUTMANN: THE CONSTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF COMMUNITARIAN VALUES DOES GUTMANN SUCCEED IN SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF COMMUNITARIAN VALUES? 1 The view of Amy Gutmann is that communitarians have
More informationIntroduction 478 U.S. 186 (1986) U.S. 558 (2003). 3
Introduction In 2003 the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its decision in Bowers v. Hardwick and struck down a Texas law that prohibited homosexual sodomy. 1 Writing for the Court in Lawrence
More informationThe public vs. private value of health, and their relationship. (Review of Daniel Hausman s Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering)
The public vs. private value of health, and their relationship (Review of Daniel Hausman s Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering) S. Andrew Schroeder Department of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna
More informationThe Proper Metric of Justice in Justice as Fairness
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 5-8-2009 The Proper Metric of Justice in Justice as Fairness Charles Benjamin Carmichael Follow
More informationWestern Philosophy of Social Science
Western Philosophy of Social Science Lecture 5. Analytic Marxism Professor Daniel Little University of Michigan-Dearborn delittle@umd.umich.edu www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~delittle/ Western Marxism 1960s-1980s
More informationIs Respect for Autonomy Defensible?
Is Respect for Autonomy Defensible? Dr James Wilson Centre for Professional Ethics (PEAK) Keele Hall Keele University Staffordshire ST5 5BG UK Phone: 0044 1782 584085 / 0044 207 0121230 Email: j.g.wilson@peak.keele.ac.uk
More informationPolitical Obligation 3
Political Obligation 3 Dr Simon Beard Sjb316@cam.ac.uk Centre for the Study of Existential Risk Summary of this lecture How John Rawls argues that we have an obligation to obey the law, whether or not
More informationChapter 12. Representations, Elections and Voting
Chapter 12 Representations, Elections and Voting 1 If Voting Changed Anything They d Abolish It Title of book by Ken Livingstone (1987) 2 Representation Representation, as a political principle, is a relationship
More informationExploitation as Theft vs. Exploitation as Underpayment
Exploitation as Theft vs. Exploitation as Underpayment San Jacinto College BIBLID [0873-626X (2015) 40; pp. 45-59] Abstract Marxists claim capitalists unjustly exploit workers, and this exploitation is
More informationPhil 290, February 22, 2011 Christiano, The Constitution of Equality, Ch. 7
Phil 290, February 22, 2011 Christiano, The Constitution of Equality, Ch. 7 Limits to democratic authority: When the democratic assembly (positively) makes a decision that encroaches on: 1. democratic
More informationThe limits of background justice. Thomas Porter. Rawls says that the primary subject of justice is what he calls the basic structure of
The limits of background justice Thomas Porter Rawls says that the primary subject of justice is what he calls the basic structure of society. The basic structure is, roughly speaking, the way in which
More informationLast time we discussed a stylized version of the realist view of global society.
Political Philosophy, Spring 2003, 1 The Terrain of a Global Normative Order 1. Realism and Normative Order Last time we discussed a stylized version of the realist view of global society. According to
More informationBetween Equality and Freedom of Choice: Educational Policy for the Least Advantaged
Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain Annual Conference New College, Oxford 1-3 April 2016 Between Equality and Freedom of Choice: Educational Policy for the Least Advantaged Mr Nico Brando
More information1100 Ethics July 2016
1100 Ethics July 2016 perhaps, those recommended by Brock. His insight that this creates an irresolvable moral tragedy, given current global economic circumstances, is apt. Blake does not ask, however,
More informationThought Leader Summary. Heather Conley SVP for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic; and Director, Europe Program, CSIS
Prospects and Priorities for U.S. Gray Zone Competition Center for Strategic and International Studies Tuesday, November 27, 2018 Heather Conley SVP for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic; and Director, Europe
More informationIs the Ideal of a Deliberative Democracy Coherent?
Chapter 1 Is the Ideal of a Deliberative Democracy Coherent? Cristina Lafont Introduction In what follows, I would like to contribute to a defense of deliberative democracy by giving an affirmative answer
More informationDoes political community require public reason? On Lister s defence of political liberalism
Article Does political community require public reason? On Lister s defence of political liberalism Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2016, Vol. 15(1) 20 41 ª The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions:
More informationDEMOCRACY is commonly conceived of in political theory in terms of
The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 18, Number 2, 2010, pp. 137 155 Democracy and Proportionality* Harry Brighouse Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, Madison and Marc Fleurbaey Economics, University
More informationSOCIAL JUSTICE AND THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION OF A MARKET SOCIETY
SOCIAL JUSTICE AND THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION OF A MARKET SOCIETY By Emil Vargovi Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
More informationECON 4270 Distributive Justice Lecture 4: Rawls and liberal equality
ECON 4270 Distributive Justice Lecture 4: Rawls and liberal equality Hilde Bojer www.folk.uio.no/hbojer hbojer@econ.uio.no February 16, 2011 Economics and welfarism Rawls: liberal equality Rawls: a Kantian
More informationUniversity of Alberta
University of Alberta Rawls and the Practice of Political Equality by Jay Makarenko A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
More informationARRANGEMENTS FOR ABSENT VOTING: MEMORANDUM FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE. Introduction
ARRANGEMENTS FOR ABSENT VOTING: MEMORANDUM FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE Introduction 1. This memorandum was originally submitted to the Procedure Committee in the 2015 Parliament in response to a request
More informationPolitical Norms and Moral Values
Penultimate version - Forthcoming in Journal of Philosophical Research (2015) Political Norms and Moral Values Robert Jubb University of Leicester rj138@leicester.ac.uk Department of Politics & International
More informationThe limits of background justice. Thomas Porter. Social Philosophy & Policy volume 30, issues 1 2. Cambridge University Press
The limits of background justice Thomas Porter Social Philosophy & Policy volume 30, issues 1 2 Cambridge University Press Abstract The argument from background justice is that conformity to Lockean principles
More informationA Rawlsian Idea of Deliberative Democracy
Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository January 2012 A Rawlsian Idea of Deliberative Democracy Angela D. White The University of Western Ontario Supervisor
More informationDo we have a moral obligation to the homeless?
Fakultät Für geisteswissenschaften Prof. Dr. matthew braham Do we have a moral obligation to the homeless? Fakultät Für geisteswissenschaften Prof. Dr. matthew braham The moral demands of the homeless:
More informationSUMMARY REPORT KEY POINTS
SUMMARY REPORT The Citizens Assembly on Brexit was held over two weekends in September 17. It brought together randomly selected citizens who reflected the diversity of the UK electorate. The Citizens
More informationEconomic Perspective. Macroeconomics I ECON 309 S. Cunningham
Economic Perspective Macroeconomics I ECON 309 S. Cunningham Methodological Individualism Classical liberalism, classical economics and neoclassical economics are based on the conception that society is
More informationLibertarianism and the Justice of a Basic Income. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri at Columbia
Libertarianism and the Justice of a Basic Income Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri at Columbia Abstract Whether justice requires, or even permits, a basic income depends on two issues: (1) Does
More informationLGIU Local Government Information Unit
Page 1 of 5 LGIU Local Government Information Unit Independent Intelligent Information Local petitions and calls for action: a consultation (LGiU) 3/1/2008 Author: Hilary Kitchin Reference No: PB 1704/08L
More informationOn Original Appropriation. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia
On Original Appropriation Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia in Malcolm Murray, ed., Liberty, Games and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism (Aldershot: Ashgate Press,
More informationMark Scheme (Results) Summer Pearson Edexcel GCE in Government & Politics (6GP03) Paper 3B: UK Political Ideologies
` Mark Scheme (Results) Summer 2017 Pearson Edexcel GCE in Government & Politics (6GP03) Paper 3B: UK Political Ideologies Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by
More informationTheories of Justice to Health Care
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2011 Theories of Justice to Health Care Jacob R. Tobis Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Tobis, Jacob R.,
More informationIn his theory of justice, Rawls argues that treating the members of a society as. free and equal achieving fair cooperation among persons thus
Feminism and Multiculturalism 1. Equality: Form and Substance In his theory of justice, Rawls argues that treating the members of a society as free and equal achieving fair cooperation among persons thus
More informationLegal Reasoning, the Rule of Law, and Legal Theory: Comments on Gerald Postema, Positivism and the Separation of the Realists from their Skepticism
Legal Reasoning, the Rule of Law, and Legal Theory: Comments on Gerald Postema, Positivism and the Separation of the Realists from their Skepticism Introduction In his incisive paper, Positivism and the
More informationWHY NOT BASE FREE SPEECH ON AUTONOMY OR DEMOCRACY?
WHY NOT BASE FREE SPEECH ON AUTONOMY OR DEMOCRACY? T.M. Scanlon * M I. FRAMEWORK FOR DISCUSSING RIGHTS ORAL rights claims. A moral claim about a right involves several elements: first, a claim that certain
More informationIntroduction to Equality and Justice: The Demands of Equality, Peter Vallentyne, ed., Routledge, The Demands of Equality: An Introduction
Introduction to Equality and Justice: The Demands of Equality, Peter Vallentyne, ed., Routledge, 2003. The Demands of Equality: An Introduction Peter Vallentyne This is the second volume of Equality and
More informationCode of Administrative Justice 2003
Public Report No. 42 March 2003 to the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia Code of Administrative Justice 2003 National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data British Columbia. Office of
More informationThe Justification of Justice as Fairness: A Two Stage Process
The Justification of Justice as Fairness: A Two Stage Process TED VAGGALIS University of Kansas The tragic truth about philosophy is that misunderstanding occurs more frequently than understanding. Nowhere
More informationResponsible Victims and (Partly) Justified Offenders
Responsible Victims and (Partly) Justified Offenders R. A. Duff VERA BERGELSON, VICTIMS RIGHTS AND VICTIMS WRONGS: COMPARATIVE LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL LAW (Stanford University Press 2009) If you negligently
More informationTwo Models of Equality and Responsibility
Two Models of Equality and Responsibility The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Published Version Accessed
More informationA Defence of Sceptical Authoritarianism
POLITICS: 2002 VOL 22(3), 152 162 A Defence of Sceptical Authoritarianism Thom Brooks Department of Philosophy University of Sheffield Vittorio Bufacchi argued in this journal that democracy was under
More informationTHRESHOLDS. Underlying principles. What submitters on the party vote threshold said
THRESHOLDS Underlying principles A threshold is the minimum level of support a party needs to gain representation. Thresholds are intended to provide for effective government and ensure that every party
More informationFRED S. MCCHESNEY, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, U.S.A.
185 thinking of the family in terms of covenant relationships will suggest ways for laws to strengthen ties among existing family members. To the extent that modern American law has become centered on
More information1. In the feudal period there was little idea of individuals having their own interests or
Liberalism Core concepts The individual 1. In the feudal period there was little idea of individuals having their own interests or possessing personal and uniue identities. Tahter people were seen as members
More informationEquality and Priority
Equality and Priority MARTIN PETERSON AND SVEN OVE HANSSON Philosophy Unit, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden This article argues that, contrary to the received view, prioritarianism and egalitarianism
More informationMEDICAL MARIJUANA ANALYZED USING PRINCIPLISM
MEDICAL MARIJUANA ANALYZED USING PRINCIPLISM Jeffrey W. Bulger Utah Valley State College Principlism is a practical approach for moral decision-making that focuses on four major principles: 1. Autonomy,
More informationPrecluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for Excuses
EJIL 1999... Precluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for Excuses Vaughan Lowe* Abstract The International Law Commission s Draft Articles on State Responsibility propose to characterize wrongful
More informationAffirmative Answers to (A/T) Common Negative Arguments
Affirmative Answers to () Common Negative Arguments Compulsory voting violates individual rights. 1. TURN: Voluntary voting systematically violates the rights of many in society. Bart Engelen states (Research
More informationChapter 4. Justice and the Law. Justice vs. Law. David Hume. Justice does not dictate a perfect world, but one in which people live up
Chapter 4 Justice and the Law Justice vs. Law Law & Justice are very different. Law is often defined as the administration of justice. Law may result in judgments that many feel are unjust Justice: Is
More informationThe. Third Way and beyond. Criticisms, futures and alternatives EDITED BY SARAH HALE WILL LEGGETT AND LUKE MARTELL
GLOBALISATIONINCLUSIO NCOMMUNITYFLEXIBILITY RESPONSIBILITYOPPORTU NITIESSAFETYORDERSPRIV ATEFINANCEINITIATIVETRA DITIONWELFAREREFORMCI TIZENSHIPNEO-LIBERALIS MEMPOWERMENTPARTICI PATIONVALUESMODERNGL OBALISATIONINCLUSIONC
More informationTwo concepts of equality Paul Dumouchel Ritsumeikan University 56-1 Toji-in, Kitamachi, Kita-ku, Kyoto JAPAN
Two concepts of equality Paul Dumouchel Dumouchp@gr.ritusmei.ac.jp Ritsumeikan University 56-1 Toji-in, Kitamachi, Kita-ku, Kyoto 603 8577 JAPAN 1 When reading current literature on equality and justice
More informationJustice As Fairness: Political, Not Metaphysical (Excerpts)
primarysourcedocument Justice As Fairness: Political, Not Metaphysical, Excerpts John Rawls 1985 [Rawls, John. Justice As Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, no. 3.
More informationTwo Pictures of the Global-justice Debate: A Reply to Tan*
219 Two Pictures of the Global-justice Debate: A Reply to Tan* Laura Valentini London School of Economics and Political Science 1. Introduction Kok-Chor Tan s review essay offers an internal critique of
More informationCapabilities vs. Opportunities for Well-being. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia
Capabilities vs. Opportunities for Well-being Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia Short Introduction for reprint in Capabilities, edited by Alexander Kaufman: Distributive justice is concerned
More informationDefinition: Institution public system of rules which defines offices and positions with their rights and duties, powers and immunities p.
RAWLS Project: to interpret the initial situation, formulate principles of choice, and then establish which principles should be adopted. The principles of justice provide an assignment of fundamental
More informationTopic Page: Democracy
Topic Page: Democracy Definition: democracy from Collins English Dictionary n pl -cies 1 government by the people or their elected representatives 2 a political or social unit governed ultimately by all
More informationThe Forgotten Principles of American Government by Daniel Bonevac
The Forgotten Principles of American Government by Daniel Bonevac The United States is the only country founded, not on the basis of ethnic identity, territory, or monarchy, but on the basis of a philosophy
More informationPolitical Obligation 4
Political Obligation 4 Dr Simon Beard Sjb316@cam.ac.uk Centre for the Study of Existential Risk Summary of this lecture Why Philosophical Anarchism doesn t usually involve smashing the system or wearing
More informationIV. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN. Thirtieth session (2004)
IV. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN Thirtieth session (2004) General recommendation No. 25: Article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention
More informationThe Values of Liberal Democracy: Themes from Joseph Raz s Political Philosophy
: Themes from Joseph Raz s Political Philosophy Conference Program Friday, April 15 th 14:00-15:00 Registration and Welcome 15:00-16:30 Keynote Address Joseph Raz (Columbia University, King s College London)
More informationElliston and Martin: Whistleblowing
Elliston and Martin: Whistleblowing Elliston: Whistleblowing and Anonymity With Michalos and Poff we ve been looking at general considerations about the moral independence of employees. In particular,
More informationRoss s view says that the basic moral principles are about prima facie duties. Ima Rossian
Ima Rossian Ross s view says that the basic moral principles are about prima facie duties. Nonconsequentialism: Some kinds of action (like killing the innocent or breaking your word) are wrong in themselves,
More informationDISCIPLINARY POLICY CODE OF CONDUCT AND RULES & PROCEDURES FOR THURSO BOWLING CLUB
DISCIPLINARY POLICY CODE OF CONDUCT AND RULES & PROCEDURES FOR THURSO BOWLING CLUB Page 1 of 6 Thurso Bowling Club Disciplinary Policy, Code of Conduct and Rules & Procedures (Accepted at the Annual General
More informationPaper C: Influencing and Changing Decisions in Society and Government
Scheme (Results) Summer 207 Pearson Edexcel GCSE in Citizenship Studies Unit 3 (5CS03) Paper C: Influencing and Changing Decisions in Society and Government Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications Edexcel and
More information