Follow this and additional works at:
|
|
- Godwin Hill
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs., $ in U.S. Currency, and, One Motorola Razor Cell Phone, and, One 2002 Infiniti I35, VIN: JNKDA31A52T027198, SEIZED FROM: Scott S. Tate, SEIZURE DATE: June 24,1999, CLAIMANT: Scott S. Tate, SEIZING AGENCY: M.N.P.D., LIENHOLDER: Tenn. C.U. Follow this and additional works at: This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov
2 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY IN THE MATTER OF: ] ] DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY ] ] VS. ] DOCKET # J ] D.O.S. # H9302 $ in U.S. Currency, and ] One Motorola Razor Cell Phone, and ] One 2002 Infiniti I35 ] VIN: JNKDA31A52T ] SEIZED FROM: Scott S. Tate ] SEIZURE DATE: June 24, 1999 ] CLAIMANT: Scott S. Tate ] SEIZING AGENCY: M.N.P.D. ] LIENHOLDER: Tenn. C.U. ] INITIAL ORDER This contested administrative case was heard in Nashville, Tennessee on April 21, 2009, before J. Randall LaFevor, Administrative Judge, assigned by the Secretary of State, and sitting for the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Safety. Ms. Cynthia Gross, Metropolitan Attorney, represented the State. The Claimant was present and was represented by his attorney, Mr. Robert Vaughn. The subject of this hearing was the proposed forfeiture of the Claimant s vehicle, currency and cell phone, based on allegations that they were used or possessed by the Claimant in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act. Upon full consideration of the record in this case, it is determined that the subject vehicle should be forfeited to the Seizing Agency, but that the other property should be returned to the Claimant. This decision is based on the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. At approximately 1:00 a.m., on December 7, 2008, an officer with the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department ( MNPD ) observed a vehicle drive through the intersection of Una-Antioch Pike and Blue Hole Road without stopping as directed by 1
3 the traffic control sign. He stopped the car and issued a citation to the driver, Scott Tate ( Claimant ) for the traffic violation. 2. While talking to the Claimant, the officer noted the smell of unburned marijuana coming from the passenger compartment of the vehicle. He investigated further, and located a baggie of marijuana (15.8 grams) and a separate jar containing a small amount of marijuana (3.4 grams). The total weight of both quantities of marijuana was approximately 19.2 grams. A subsequent search of the driver produced $ in currency and a Motorola Cell Phone. 3. The Claimant admitted to the officer that the plant material in his car was two different varieties of marijuana. The Claimant made no further admissions. Based on his discovery of the marijuana, and although the officer had observed no illegal activity except the Claimant s failure to stop at the intersection, the officer surmised that the Claimant had just sold a large quantity of marijuana, and had received the $ in cash as proceeds from that sale. He further inferred that the Claimant s cell phone had been used to arrange the sale that he believed had just occurred. Based on his inference and conjecture, he seized the Claimant s car, money and phone, and later obtained a Forfeiture Warrant for those items. 4. During the hearing, the State introduced certified copies of the Claimant s prior convictions for various drug and weapons offenses, including Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Sell in 1998, 1999 and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and ANALYSIS 1. The State bears the burden of proof in this case, and must therefore prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the seized property is subject to forfeiture, pursuant to the laws of this state. Failure to carry the burden of proof operates as a bar to the proposed forfeiture. TENN. CODE ANN (d)(2); Rule , TENN. COMP. R. & REGS., Rules of the Tennessee Department of Safety. 1 See Hearing Exhibits # 1, 2 & 3. 2
4 2. All conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels, that are used, or are intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transportation, sale or receipt of controlled substances in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, are subject to forfeiture under the law. TENN. CODE ANN (a)(4). The State cites this statute in support of its proposed forfeiture of the Claimant s vehicle 3. When the Claimant s vehicle was stopped, it was found to contain two different types of marijuana packaged in separate containers. Although the State was unable to produce a lab report identifying the substance, the Claimant admitted to the officer that it was in fact marijuana. The seizing officer testified that he had determined it to be marijuana, based on his training and experience. Under the Department s Rules, that is sufficient proof to establish the identity of the substance as marijuana. See Rule (4), TENN. COMP. R. & REGS., Rules of the Tennessee Department of Safety. 2 Applying the Department s Rule to this case, it is concluded that the Claimant was in possession of 19.2 grams of marijuana. 4. Possession of more than one-half (½) ounce ( grams) of marijuana is classified as felony possession of a controlled substance. See, TENN. CODE ANN (g). It may be inferred from the amount of a controlled substance or substances possessed by an offender, along with other relevant facts surrounding an arrest, that the controlled substance or substances were possessed with the purpose of selling or otherwise dispensing. TENN. CODE ANN In this case, the State proved that the Claimant was transporting more than onehalf ounce of marijuana in his car. Based on the felony-level amount possessed, the fact that it was of two different varieties and was packaged in two separate containers, and the fact that the Claimant has a prior criminal record that includes three felony convictions for Possession of Marijuana for Resale, it is inferred that he was transporting the drug on December 7, 2008 for the purpose of selling or otherwise dispensing it. It is concluded, therefore, that the seized vehicle was used to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the 2 That rule provides, in relevant part, that marijuana may be identified, for the purpose of a contested case hearing, by a qualified representative of the seizing agency, or by statements of the claimant. 3
5 transportation, sale or receipt of controlled substances in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, and is therefore subject to forfeiture under the law. TENN. CODE ANN (a)(4). 6. The State next asserts that the money and cell phone found in the Claimant s possession are subject to forfeiture, citing TENN. CODE ANN (a)(2). [See December 8, 2009 Forfeiture Warrant.] That Code section provides that All raw materials, products and equipment of any kind that are used, or intended for use, in compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting any controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, are subject to forfeiture under the law. As best can be determined from its proof and argument, it appears that the State claims the money and cell phone are products and equipment that were used in delivering the marijuana. 7. Although the seizing officer testified that he believed the Claimant had received the $ in his possession from the sale of a large quantity of marijuana before he was stopped for the traffic violation, and that the Claimant had used his cell phone to arrange that sale, he was unable to produce any evidence supporting the existence of such a transaction. Without some proof that a drug transaction took place, it is not possible to conclude that the seized money came from such a transaction, or that the cell phone was used to arrange it. There is no such proof in the record. While a police officer s experience, and his inferences based on that experience, may form a basis for further investigation, his conjecture and belief alone will not sustain a property forfeiture. Because the proposed forfeiture is not supported by the evidence, it must be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the subject vehicle, the 2002 Infiniti I35, is hereby forfeited to the Seizing Agency, the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, for disposition according to law, subject to the legal interest of the lien holder, the Tennessee Credit Union. 4
6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the $ in U.S. currency, and Motorola cell phone, shall be RETURNED to the Claimant, Scott S. Tate. Entered and effective this 28th day of April, Randall LaFevor, Administrative Judge Filed in the Administrative Procedures Division, Office of the Secretary of State, this 28th day of April, Thomas G. Stovall, Director Administrative Procedures Division 5
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-10-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-13-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-24-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-22-2008 Tennessee Department
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-6-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-29-2012 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-19-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-29-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-17-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationValorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-22-2013 Valorie D. Thacker vs.
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2008 Tennessee Department
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-5-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-15-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-27-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-4-2009, DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationTrey & Michael Torres vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-13-2014 Trey & Michael Torres
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-26-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-16-2006 Department of Safety,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-28-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationVanessa Quilantan vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law January 2015 Vanessa Quilantan
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-11-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-2-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationWilliam K. Bryant vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law September 2013 William K. Bryant
More informationDEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. $6, in US Currency, Seized from: Todd Walters, Date of Seizure: August 21, 2008, Claimant: Todd Walters
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-14-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-12-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT vs. $ in U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM: MOISES SILVA, SEIZURE DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2009 CLAIMANT: MOISES SILVA
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-9-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationOne 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-26-2013 One 1994 Chevrole Pickup,
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-21-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-27-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 9-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-11-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationRobert M. Russell vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-30-2014 Robert M. Russell vs.
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-21-2006 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-18-2006 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-31-2008 One 2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer,
More informationMatthew McBee vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-17-2014 Matthew McBee vs. Safety
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 9-11-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. KEVIN BEATY
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-4-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-20-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-5-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-21-2012 State of Tennessee Department
More informationCornelius Sorina vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-23-2014 Cornelius Sorina vs.
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-12-2012 Tina (M1888) Bilbrey,
More informationGary F. Bickford vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law October 2013 Gary F. Bickford
More informationGregory Brunson vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-27-2014 Gregory Brunson vs.
More informationPublished on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property
Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-18-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-19-2007 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationAzam Mani Khwaga dba Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor vs. Alcoholic Beverage Commission
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-2-2014 Azam Mani Khwaga dba
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-2-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-13-2007 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP-07-14DOYLE WITCHER, Grievant/, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-26-2007 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2008 Session SB 972 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Senate Bill 972 Judicial Proceedings (Senator Forehand) Identity Fraud - Seizure and Forfeiture This
More informationTennessee Insurance Division, Petitioner, vs. John Porter Franklin, Jr., Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law November 2012 Tennessee Insurance
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-24-2010 Terry Lynn Pennix Follow
More informationBOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-7-2011 BOARD OF EDUCATION vs.
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-24-2009 Joyce Allen Follow
More informationTENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-4-2008 TENNESSEE INSURANCE
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-2-2008 James R. Edens Sr Follow
More informationTennessee Department of Financial Institutions, Compliance Division, Petitioner, vs. Charlton Hildreth, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-24-2009 Tennessee Department
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-6-01 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-6-2006 Shane Quinn Follow this
More informationUNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 913 A BILL ENTITLED
UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 913 L5 6lr0613 By: Prince George's County Delegation and Montgomery County Delegation Introduced and read first time: February 9, 2006 Assigned to: Judiciary 1 AN ACT concerning
More informationSTOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT DATE: January 24, 2008 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: Asset Seizure Forfeiture Narcotics Asset
More informationANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO (8-2)
i~")i(...i..~~.) Submitted by: Assembly Members Abney, Murdy Prepared by: Department of Law For reading: May. 0 II 0 0 0 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO. -(-) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL CODE ntle,
More informationTHE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff vs EDWARD WALKER Defendant CASE NO. CR 429590 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER FRIEDMAN, J.: 1. The Court has before it a proposed
More informationDEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIDELITY HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-2-2010 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Petitioner, vs. KYLE CANTWELL, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-16-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-25-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN M. FRIERSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2007-C-2329
More informationHumphreys Flowers, Inc. vs. AGRICULTURE
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law March 2015 Humphreys Flowers,
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-10-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationTitle 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 517: ASSET FORFEITURE Table of Contents Part 7. ASSET FORFEITURE... Section 5821. SUBJECT PROPERTY... 3 Section 5821-A. PROPERTY NOT SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE
More informationGloria Sanchez vs. DHS
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law September 2013 Gloria Sanchez
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Whitsett, 2014-Ohio-4933.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101182 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERNEST M. WHITSETT
More informationCommerce and Insurance vs. KEITH ODENE DODD, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-4-2012 Commerce and Insurance
More informationCTAS e-li. Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers
Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library known as e-li. This online library
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIRST CHOICE FUNDING, INC., Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-15-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION (BOPP), Department, vs. BARBARA DATTULO, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-16-2013 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationMark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law February 2015 Mark Singer vs.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 18, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 18, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KALE SANDUSKY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 14203 Robert Lee Holloway, Jr.,
More information21 USC 881. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER 13 - DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL SUBCHAPTER I - CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT Part E - Administrative and Enforcement Provisions 881. Forfeitures (a) Subject property
More informationMETRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT (Metro Nashville Police Department), Petitioner/ Department vs. JONATHAN SMITH, Respondent/Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-21-2012 METRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT
More informationCITY OF RIO RANCHO ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF RIO RANCHO ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. ENACTMENT NO. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CODE TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICLE SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE UPON SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT ARREST
More informationAnderson Hutsell vs. Dept. of Health
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-20-2013 Anderson Hutsell vs.
More informationBen Miller dba Miller Enterprises vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law November 2014 Ben Miller dba Miller
More informationCriminal Forfeiture Act
Criminal Forfeiture Act Model Legislation March 20, 2017 100:1 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the terms defined in this section have the following meanings: I. Abandoned property means personal
More informationChapter 5 IMPOUNDMENT OF VEHICLES USED IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES
CITY OF WARRENVILLE DuPage County, Illinois ORDINANCE NO. 2898 ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 5 OF THE WARRENVILLE CITY CODE RE IMPOUNDMENT OF VEHICLES USED IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the Mayor
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE
10/14/2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule
More informationForfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest.
20-28.2. Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest. (a) Meaning of "Impaired Driving License Revocation".
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 22, 2017 Session
05/24/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 22, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GREGORY T. PHELPS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 104306A G. Scott
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session SB 685 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Senate Bill 685 Judicial Proceedings (Senator Robey) Vehicle Laws - Fleeing or Eluding Police - Penalties
More informationTerry W. Rankin vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-10-2014 Terry W. Rankin vs.
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Petitioner, vs. LINDA A. JOHNSON, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-2-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More information2007 Indiana House Bill No. 1103, Indiana One Hundred Fifteenth General Assembly - First Regular Session
2007 Indiana House Bill No. 1103, Indiana One Hundred Fifteenth General Assembly - First Regular Session INDIANA BILL TEXT (Amendments in BOLD) VERSION: Introduced January 08, 2007 A BILL FOR AN ACT to
More informationNovember 18, November 18, November 18, November 18, November 18, 2013
CITY OF LE ROY COUNTY OF McLEAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 13-11-03-70 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING TITLE SIX, CHAPTER SIX ENTITLED "SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDING OF VEHICLES" TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF LE ROY,
More information8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12 - IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER II - IMMIGRATION Part VIII - General Penalty Provisions 1324. Bringing in and harboring certain aliens (a) Criminal
More informationCRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE COURTS AND CORRECTIONS / PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE COURTS AND CORRECTIONS / PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform The Act ends the practice of civil forfeiture but preserves criminal forfeiture, in which property
More information