Follow this and additional works at:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Follow this and additional works at:"

Transcription

1 University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs GMC SUBURBAN, VIN #1GKEC16RXWJ720616, SEIZED FROM: JERMAIN BLAIR, SEIZURE DATE: APRIL 10, 2009, CLAIMANT: ASHLYN KNIGHT, LIENHOLDER: n/a Follow this and additional works at: This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov

2 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY In the matter of: ) ) TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT ) OF SAFETY, v. ) ) 1993 GMC SUBURBAN ) VIN #1GKEC16RXWJ ) SEIZED FROM: JERMAIN BLAIR ) SEIZURE DATE: APRIL 10, 2009 ) CLAIMANT: ASHLYN KNIGHT ) LIENHOLDER: n/a ) ) Docket No J ) ) Department of Safety ) Case No. J3236 ) INITIAL ORDER This matter came on to be heard on October 13, 2009 in Knoxville, Tennessee before Joyce Grimes Safley, Administrative Judge, assigned by the Secretary of State, and sitting for the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Safety. Ms. Nina Harris, attorney for the Department of Safety, represented the State. Claimant Ashlyn Knight was present at the hearing and was represented by Ms. Lauren Biloski, attorney, of the Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bar. The subject of this hearing was the proposed forfeiture of a 1993 GMC Suburban vehicle, VIN #1GKEC16RXWJ720616, for the seized vehicle s alleged use in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, T.C.A , et seq., and T.C.A (a)(4). $ in U.S. currency was also seized from the driver of the

3 vehicle, Jermaine Blair. However, no claim was filed for the currency, so the currency is forfeited by operation of law. After consideration of the evidence offered, the arguments of counsel, and the entire record in this matter, it is ORDERED that the seized vehicle be immediately FORFEITED to the seizing agency. This decision is based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On April 10, 2009 Officer Ray Steakley, of the Oak Ridge, Tennessee Police Department, was on patrol in Oak Ridge when he received a BOLO ( be on the lookout ) for a blue Suburban vehicle with TN registration 023-THZ. 2. Officer Steakley was informed by the Oak Ridge Police Department dispatch that a citizen had called in a complaint stating that he had observed the occupants of the vehicle making a drug transaction. The caller informed dispatch of the description and tag number of the vehicle, as well as the exact location of the vehicle. 3. Officer Steakley found the subject vehicle. He verified the tag number, and when he observed that the driver of the vehicle, Jermaine Blair, was not wearing a seat belt, Officer Steakley initiated a traffic stop on Mr. Blair. 4. Officer Steakley smelled a strong odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle driven by Mr. Blair. 5. Officer Steakley and an assisting officer, Dustin Henderson, found four plastic baggies containing marijuana laying on the ground beside the passenger side 2

4 of the vehicle, and also discovered one plastic baggie of marijuana stuck in the passenger s side door of the vehicle. 6. Both the driver of the vehicle, Mr. Blair, and the passenger of the vehicle were arrested and placed into custody. Mr. Blair was charged with possession of marijuana for resale. 7. Jermaine Blair had $ in U.S. currency in his pockets. Mr. Blair was unemployed except for occasional landscaping work, and could not explain a legitimate source for the currency. Consequently, Mr. Blair s currency was seized. No claim was filed for the seized money. 8. Mr. Blair s criminal record was retrieved by the officers. It revealed that Mr. Blair had a criminal record for felony possessions of schedule VI drugs for resale, felony possessions of marijuana for resale, possession of schedule IV drugs for resale, and felony possession of a schedule II drug (crack cocaine) for resale. 9. The TBI Forensic Chemistry Report revealed that the seized marijuana was 14.6 grams in weight. 10. Officer Steakley s testimony was credible. 11. Claimant Ashlyn Knight testified. She stated that she is the owner of the seized Suburban. 12. Ms. Knight testified that the driver of the seized vehicle, Jermaine Blair, is her fiancé. Ms. Knight related that she and Mr. Blair have been together in a relationship for eleven years. 13. Ms. Knight admitted that she knew Mr. Blair had a history of drug activities. Ms. Knight was aware of Mr. Blair s previous arrests and criminal record. 3

5 14. According to Ms. Knight, Mr. Blair sometimes used her Suburban. She kept the Suburban s keys on the bookshelf. 15. Mr. Blair testified that he had lived with Ms. Knight for seven years. He and Ms. Knight have a daughter. He admitted that he did not have to ask permission to use the Suburban, and he has his own key to the Suburban. He testified that he used the Suburban two or three times per week. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The State has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the seized vehicle was subject to forfeiture because it was being used or was intended to be used to violate the Tennessee Drug Control Act, T.C.A See T.C.A and T.C.A (d)(2). Failure to carry the burden of proof operates as a bar to any forfeiture and the property shall be immediately returned to the Claimant. T.C.A (b)(1). 2. T.C.A (a)(2) provides that all raw materials, products, and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in manufacturing, compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting any controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act are subject to forfeiture. 3. T.C.A permits an inference from the amount of controlled substance or substances possessed by an offender, along with other relevant facts surrounding the arrest, that the controlled substance or substances were possessed with the purpose of selling or otherwise dispensing. 4. In Claimant s case, he had transported 14.6 grams of marijuana, which was packaged in four baggies. He had a large amount of cash on his person which 4

6 could not be attributed to employment or legitimate acquisition. When the Officer made the traffic stop, there was a strong odor or marijuana in the vehicle. 5. T.C.A states as follows: T.C.A Criminal offenses and penalties. --- (a) It is an offense for a defendant to knowingly: *** (4) Possess a controlled substance [such as marijuana] with intent to manufacture, deliver or sell such controlled substance. 6. T.C.A (g)(1) provides that subsection (a)(4) is violated [intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell) with respect to a Schedule VI controlled substance classified as marijuana when the amount is not less than one-half ounce ( grams) up to ten pounds (4535 grams) of marijuana. Such a violation is a Class E felony. 7. Because Claimant possessed and/or transported greater than one-half ounce of marijuana, packaged in four bags, the inference is made that Claimant intended to transport and deliver or sell the marijuana recovered from the vehicle. 8. It is noted that no conveyance is subject to forfeiture under T.C.A for simple possession of a controlled substance as set forth in T.C.A See T.C.A (4)(C) and T.C.A If the State presents a prima facie case for forfeiture, i.e., that the vehicle was used or intended to be used to facilitate a violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act or drug laws, the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts to the claimant to prove either that the vehicle is not subject to forfeiture or that claimant has a good faith interest in the vehicle and that he or she did not know or have reason to know that the property was being used to facilitate a violation of the drug 5

7 laws. T.C.A (f)(1). See also, Urquhart v. Department of Safety, 2008 WL (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). 10. Claimant did not show that she did not know or have reason to know that her vehicle was being used to facilitate a violation of Tennessee s drug laws. In fact, her testimony supports that she knew of Mr. Blair s past criminal record and his drug activities. Mr. Blair did not have to ask permission to use the Suburban, but was free to use it as he chose. 11. Rule (4), The Rules of Procedure for Asset Forfeiture Hearings, Department of Safety (Revised) sets forth the criteria for determining ownership of a vehicle: If the person in possession of the property is not the registered owner as determined from public records of titles, registrations, or other recorded documents, the officer may submit certain indicia of ownership to the judge which proves that the possessor is nonetheless the owner of the property. Such indicia of ownership shall include, but is not limited to the following: (a) How the parties involved regarded ownership of the vehicle in question; (b) The intentions of the parties relative to ownership of the property; (c) Who was responsible for originally purchasing the property; (d) Who pays any insurance, license or fees required to possess or operate the property; (e) Who maintains and repairs the property; (f) Who uses or operates the property; (g) Who has access to the property; (h) Who acts as if they have a proprietary interest in the property? 12. Claimant cannot show that she is an innocent owner when she had knowledge of Mr. Blair s drug activities. Further, the testimony of both Mr. Blair 6

8 and Claimant supports that Mr. Blair can use the vehicle at his pleasure, which fulfills many of the indicia of ownership factors. 13. The evidence preponderates that Mr. Blair was using the seized vehicle to transport and deliver marijuana for resale. Claimant has not shown that she is an innocent owner. Claimant s use of the vehicle supports that he used the vehicle as his own vehicle without asking Claimant s permission. 14. The State has met its burden of proof in this case. The seized vehicle is subject to forfeiture. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above captioned vehicle be immediately FORFEITED to the seizing agency. It is so ordered. This Order entered and effective this 25th day of November, Thomas G. Stovall, Director Administrative Procedures Division 7

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-24-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-21-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-10-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Trey & Michael Torres vs. Safety

Trey & Michael Torres vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-13-2014 Trey & Michael Torres

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT vs. $ in U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM: MOISES SILVA, SEIZURE DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2009 CLAIMANT: MOISES SILVA

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT vs. $ in U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM: MOISES SILVA, SEIZURE DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2009 CLAIMANT: MOISES SILVA University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-9-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-15-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. $6, in US Currency, Seized from: Todd Walters, Date of Seizure: August 21, 2008, Claimant: Todd Walters

DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. $6, in US Currency, Seized from: Todd Walters, Date of Seizure: August 21, 2008, Claimant: Todd Walters University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-14-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-19-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

One 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A.

One 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-26-2013 One 1994 Chevrole Pickup,

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-27-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-6-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:  Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2008 Tennessee Department

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-22-2008 Tennessee Department

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-27-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Vanessa Quilantan vs. Safety

Vanessa Quilantan vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law January 2015 Vanessa Quilantan

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-21-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-16-2006 Department of Safety,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-21-2012 State of Tennessee Department

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-2-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-29-2012 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-11-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. KEVIN BEATY

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. KEVIN BEATY University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-4-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-5-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 9-11-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Robert M. Russell vs. Safety

Robert M. Russell vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-30-2014 Robert M. Russell vs.

More information

Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property

Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-18-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,

More information

Gregory Brunson vs. Safety

Gregory Brunson vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-27-2014 Gregory Brunson vs.

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-21-2006 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,

More information

William K. Bryant vs. Safety

William K. Bryant vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law September 2013 William K. Bryant

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-12-2012 Tina (M1888) Bilbrey,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-17-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-2-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-4-2009, DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

Gary F. Bickford vs. Safety

Gary F. Bickford vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law October 2013 Gary F. Bickford

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-5-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-28-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-26-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-20-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-18-2006 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,

More information

Valorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety

Valorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-22-2013 Valorie D. Thacker vs.

More information

Matthew McBee vs. Safety

Matthew McBee vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-17-2014 Matthew McBee vs. Safety

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-29-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-31-2008 One 2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer,

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-11-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-25-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-12-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 9-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Whitsett, 2014-Ohio-4933.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101182 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERNEST M. WHITSETT

More information

v No Oakland Circuit Court

v No Oakland Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED September 19, 2017 v No. 332310 Oakland Circuit Court MICHAEL DOUGLAS NORTH, LC

More information

BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.

BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-7-2011 BOARD OF EDUCATION vs.

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Petitioner, vs. KYLE CANTWELL, Grievant

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Petitioner, vs. KYLE CANTWELL, Grievant University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-16-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant:

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant: [Cite as State v. Ricks, 2004-Ohio-6913.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84500 STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS :

More information

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library known as e-li. This online library

More information

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff vs EDWARD WALKER Defendant CASE NO. CR 429590 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER FRIEDMAN, J.: 1. The Court has before it a proposed

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2009 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D08-2047 ASHLER RISHAUD TAYLOR, Appellee. / Opinion filed August 28, 2009

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant.

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-10-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:  Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-13-2007 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,

More information

Cornelius Sorina vs. Safety

Cornelius Sorina vs. Safety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-23-2014 Cornelius Sorina vs.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Sedgwick District

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN M. FRIERSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2007-C-2329

More information

TENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent

TENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-4-2008 TENNESSEE INSURANCE

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 2, 2006

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 2, 2006 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 2, 2006 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEUSI YAMBA DONALD Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Weakley County No. CR13-2004 William

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2011

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2011 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2011 XAVIER TYRELL BARHAM v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 93345 Bob

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 20, 2008

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 20, 2008 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 20, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARCUS GREER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 17514 Robert

More information

PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Post Office Box 40 BRIAN T. WALTZ West Jefferson, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR 20 South Second Street Newark, Ohio 43055

PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Post Office Box 40 BRIAN T. WALTZ West Jefferson, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR 20 South Second Street Newark, Ohio 43055 [Cite as State v. Molla, 2008-Ohio-5331.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- ACHENAFI T. MOLLA Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. John W.

More information

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIDELITY HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIDELITY HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-2-2010 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL

More information

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 517: ASSET FORFEITURE Table of Contents Part 7. ASSET FORFEITURE... Section 5821. SUBJECT PROPERTY... 3 Section 5821-A. PROPERTY NOT SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JANUARY SESSION, 1998

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JANUARY SESSION, 1998 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED JANUARY SESSION, 1998 March 5, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9703-CC-00108 ) Appellee,

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:  Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-24-2010 Terry Lynn Pennix Follow

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, AUSTIN JAMES VALENZUELA DOB: 08/21/1998 29 1st Ave NW #1 Defendant. District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 0660041185

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- ERWIN E. FAGARAGAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. SCWC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- ERWIN E. FAGARAGAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. SCWC Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000592 14-FEB-2014 02:30 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- ERWIN E. FAGARAGAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. STATE OF HAWAI I,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 27, 2016

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 27, 2016 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 27, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DEVIN LAMAR JAMISON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 101604 Bob McGee,

More information

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER RUTHERFORD

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER RUTHERFORD IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 10, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER RUTHERFORD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 11-442 Donald

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 22, 2017 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 22, 2017 Session 05/24/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 22, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GREGORY T. PHELPS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 104306A G. Scott

More information

Commerce and Insurance vs. KEITH ODENE DODD, Respondent

Commerce and Insurance vs. KEITH ODENE DODD, Respondent University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-4-2012 Commerce and Insurance

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session 02/22/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICHARD EUGENE REED Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 103209 Scott

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2017, at Knoxville

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2017, at Knoxville IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2017, at Knoxville 06/20/2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER COLLIER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 5357 Joseph

More information

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Courage, Pride, and Dedication

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Courage, Pride, and Dedication CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Courage, Pride, and Dedication Order Subject D-41 ASSET FORFEITURE 200 Procedures Effective 01/08/10 A. SEIZURE OF VEHICLES 1. VEHICLES WHICH HAVE

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2006

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2006 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2006 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TIMMY LEE HILL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 16347 Lee Russell,

More information

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN November 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN November 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PRESENT: All the Justices PHILLIP JEROME MURPHY v. Record No. 020771 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN November 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA In this appeal,

More information

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Appellate Case No Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Appellate Case No Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Artez Pulley, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2015-002206 Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

More information

Mark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance

Mark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law February 2015 Mark Singer vs.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 6, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 6, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 6, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SAVALAS O. McNEAL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 03-696 Donald H.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 19, 2018 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 19, 2018 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 19, 2018 Session 08/31/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAMMY TUTTLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 23036 Stella L. Hargrove,

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-19-2007 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest.

Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest. 20-28.2. Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest. (a) Meaning of "Impaired Driving License Revocation".

More information

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT DATE: January 24, 2008 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: Asset Seizure Forfeiture Narcotics Asset

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO CR 3357

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO CR 3357 [Cite as State v. Jolly, 2008-Ohio-6547.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 22811 v. : T.C. NO. 2007 CR 3357 DERION JOLLY : (Criminal

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIE McDONALD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 06-451 Donald Allen,

More information

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO (8-2)

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO (8-2) i~")i(...i..~~.) Submitted by: Assembly Members Abney, Murdy Prepared by: Department of Law For reading: May. 0 II 0 0 0 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO. -(-) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL CODE ntle,

More information

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT. STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. WD78413 ) CHRISTOPHER P. HUMBLE, ) ) Respondent.

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT. STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. WD78413 ) CHRISTOPHER P. HUMBLE, ) ) Respondent. IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. WD78413 ) CHRISTOPHER P. HUMBLE, ) ) Respondent. ) APPEAL TO THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 30, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 30, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 30, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE. v. DWIGHT J. SHANKLE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for McMinn County No. 08-267 Carroll

More information

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge. October 16, 2018

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge. October 16, 2018 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-2808 CHRISTOPHER ANTIAWN JONES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.

More information

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE 10/14/2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 26, 2011

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 26, 2011 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 26, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVEN Q. STANFORD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County No. 14163

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2012

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2012 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CORNELIUS MULL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 09-05418 Lee V. Coffee,

More information