Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 10UUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. ISC(.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 10UUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. ISC(."

Transcription

1 111LAURA E DUFFY United States Attorney 211SHERR WALKER HOBSO Assistant U.S. Attorney 311Caifornia Bar No Office of the U.S. Attorney Front Street, Room 623 San Diego, CA Teephone (61) f 611Attorneys for Paintiff United States of America 7 8 UNTED STATES DSTRCT COURT SOUTHERN DSTRCT OF CALFORNA UUNTED STATES OF AMERCA, Case No. SC(. Lst; 11 Paintiff, PLEA AGREEMENT. (Fast-Track) 12 v. 13 EVELO PADLLA-ZEPADA, 14 Defendant. 15~ ~ 16 T S HEREBY AGREED between the paintiff, UNTED STATES OF 17 AMERCA, through its counse, Laura E. Duffy, United States Attorney, 18 and Sherri Waker Hobson, Assistant United States Attorney, and 1 defendant, Eveio Padia-Zepada, with the advice and consent of Manua Ramirez, counse for defendant, as foows: 28 njacl:m:81815 Def. nitias~ - -

2 A. THE CHARGE THE PLEA Defendant agrees to waive ndictment and pead guity to a \ f. 5 singe-count nformation charging defendant with: On or about Apri 25, 2015, within the Southern District of Caifornia, defendant Eveio Padia-Zepeda, did knowingy and intentionay possess, with intent to distribute, a mixture and substance containing a detectabe amount of cocaine, a Schedue Controed Substance; in vioation of Tite 21, United States Code, Section 841(a) (1). B. EARLY DSPOSTON (FAST-TRACK) PROGRAM 11 The disposition contempated by this pea agreement is pursuant 12 to an eary disposition (Fast-Track) program authorized by the 13 Attorney Genera of the United States and the United States Attorney 14 for the Southern District of Caifornia Defendant agrees further that, foowing entry of defendant's 16 guity pea, the Government need not hod or preserve any evidence 17 seized in connection with this case. With respect to any controed 18substance seized in connection with this case, defendant agrees that, 1 foowing entry of defendant's guity pea, the Government need not 20preserve, and may destroy, the controed substance ' thirty (30) days 2after the Government has provided defendant with the aboratory 22 anaysis report. f defendant beieves that additiona testing is 231needed, defendant wi arrange for, and compete, such testing within 24 the above-referenced thirty ( 30) day period, unes s that period is 25extended by joint written agreement between the partfes or by order of 26 the Court, in which case the Government sha preserve the controed 27 substance for 28 Furthermore, if the agreed-upon or judiciay mandated period;. the court has issued a preser.v atron orde~ 2 Def. nitias~ _K_cR J~ ~

3 1 connection with any seized evidence, the defendant agrees to jointy 2request that the Court ift or revoke the preservation order foowing 3entry of defendant's guity pea. 4 c. FORFETURE 511 The defendant further agrees to the administrative and/or civi 6forfeiture of a properties seized in connection with this case which 7 the defendant agrees are subject to forfeiture to the United States 8pursuant to Tite 21, United States Code, Section 881. The defendant further waives his/her right to receive timey notice of administrative forfeiture as set forth in 18 U.S.C. ~ 83(a) and waives receipt of a notice of forfeiture in this and a other 12administrative and civi proceedings. Defendant waives and discaims 13 defendants' interest, if any, in the properties to be forfeited as 14 described above. Defendant further agrees not to contest or to assist 15any other person or entity in contesting the forfe1ture of the 16property(ies) seized in connection with this case A. ELEMEN''S EXPLANED NATURE OF THE OFFENSE 20 Defendant understands that the offense to which 'defendant is 21peading guity has the foowing eements: Defendant knowingy possessed cocaine; and Defendant possessed the cocaine with the intent to deiver it to another person. 25 B. ELBMEN'rS UNDERSTOOD AND ADMTTED - FACTUAL BASS 2611 Defendant has fuy discussed the facts of this case with defense 27 counse. 28 Defendant has committed each of the eements of the crime, 3 Def. nitias ~) JLCR /J$' ---

4 111 and admits that there is a factua basis for this guity pea. The 2foowing facts are true and undisputed: That on or about Apri 25, 2015, defendant entered the south cana bank of the A-American cana in Caexico through an underground tunne from Mexico into the United States. Defendant was wearing scuba gear. That at the time tunne, defendant packages. he entered the cana through the was carrying cocaine in mutipe That at the time he entered the cana through the tunne, defendant knew that he possessed cocaine and intended to use his scuba gear to transport the cocaine in the cana and underwater to another ocation in the A-American cana. 12 PENALTES 1311 Defendant understands that the crime to which defendant is 1411Peading guity carries the foowing penaties: A. B. c. D. A maximum 20 years in prison; A maximum $1,000,000 fine; A mandatory specia assessment of $0.00 per count; and A term of supervised reease of at east 3 years and up to ife. Defendant understands that faiure to compy with any of the conditions of supervised reease may resut in revocation of supervised reease, requiring defendant to serve in prison, upon any such revocation, a or part of the statutory maximum term of supervised reease for the offense that resuted in such term of supervised reease; and E. Possibe ineigibiity for certain Federa benefits. V DEFENDANT'S WAVER OF TRAL RGHTS Defendant understands that this guity pea waives the right to: A. Continue to pead not guity and require the Government to prove the eements of the crime beyond a re.asonabe doubt; 28 B. A speedy and pubic tria by jury; 4 Def nitias ~ j_ CR /Jr(' ~

5 1 c. 2 D. 3 E. 4 F. 5 The assistance of counse at a stages of tria; Confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses; Testify and present evidence and to have witnesses testify on behaf of defendant; and Not testify or have any adverse inferences drawn from the faiure to testi fy. 6 V 7 DEFENDANT ACKNOWLEDGES NO PRETRAL UGHT TO BE PROVDED WTH MPEACHMENT AND AFFRMATVE DEFENSE NFORMATON 8 The Government represents that any information estabishing the factua innocence of defendant known to the undersigned prosecutor in this case has been turned over to defendant. The Government wi 11 continue to provide such information estabishing the factua innocence of defendant. Defendant understands that, if this case proceeded to tria, the 14 Government woud be required to provide impeachment information reating to any informants or other witnesses. n addition, if i i 1 J :~ 18 defense. Defendant acknowedges, however, that by peading guity 1 defendant wi not be provided this information, if ~ny, ~nd defend~nt 20 aso waives the right to this information. Finay, defendant agrees not to attempt to withdraw the guity pea or to fie a attack based on the existence of this information. coatera 23 V DEFENDANT' S REPRESENTATON THAT GULTY PLEA S KNOWNG AND VOLUNTARY Defendant represents that: A. Defendant has had a fu opportunity to ~ discuss a the facts and circumstances of this case with defense counse, 5 De~. n~tia-s!~ ~CR /Jrs.

6 B. c. and has a cear understanding of the charges and the consequences of this pea. Defendant understands that, by peading guity, defendant may be giving up, and rendered ineigibe to receive, vauabe government benefits and civic rights, such as the right to vote, the right to possess a firearm, the right to hod office, and the right to serve on a jury. Defendant further understands that the conviction in this case may subject defendant to various coatera consequences, incuding but not imited to deportation, remova or other adverse immigration consequences; revocation of probation, paroe, or supervised reease in another case; debarment from government contracting; and suspension or revocation of a professiona icense, none of which wi serve as grounds to withdraw defendant's guity pea; No one has made any promises or offered any rewards in return for this guity pea, other than those contained in this agreement or otherwise discosed to the court; No one has threatened defendant or defendant's famiy to induce this guity pea; and 12 D. Defendant is peading guity because in truth and in f~ct defendant is guity and for no other reason. 13 V 14 AGREEMENT LMTED TO 0. S. ATTORNEY' S OFFCE 1511 SOUTHERN DSTRCT OF CALFORNA 1611 This pea agreement is imited to the United states Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Caifornia, and cannot bind any 18 other federa, state or oca prosecuting, administrative, or 1 reguatory authorities, athough the Government wi bring this pea 20 agreement to the attention of other authorities if requested by the 2111 defendant. 22 V 2 3 APPLCABLTY OF SENTENCNG GUDELNES Defendant understands the sentence imposed wi be based on the 2511factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). Defendant understands 2611 further that, in imposing the sentence, the sentencing judge must 27consut the United States Sentencing Guideines (Guideines) and take 2 8 them into account. Defendant has discussed the. Gui deines with 6 Def. nitias ~CR3r(

7 defense counse and understands that the Guideines are ony advisory, 211not mandatory, and the court may impose a sentence more severe or ess 3severe than otherwise appicabe under the Guideines, up to the 4 maximum in the statute of conviction. Defendant understands further 1 ; i i! Sthat the sentence cannot be determined unti a presentence report has 6been prepared by the U.S. Probation Office and defense counse and the 711Government has had an opportunity to review and chaenge the 8 presentence report. Defendant agrees to request that a presentence report be prepared. Nothing in this pea agreement sha be construed 11 as imiting the Government's duty to provide compete and accurate facts to the district court and the U.S. Probation Office. 12 X 13 SENTENCE S WTHN SOLE DSCRETON OF JUDGE This pea agreement is made pursuant to Federa Rue of Crimina 1511 Procedure 11 (c) (1) (B). Defendant understands that the sentence is 16 within the soe discretion of the sentencing judge. The Government 1711has not made and wi not make any representation as to what sentence 18 defendant wi receive. Defendant understands that the sentencing 1judge may impose the maximum sentence provided by statute, and is aso 20aware that any estimate of the probabe sentence by defense counse is 2111a prediction, not a promise, and is not binding on the Court. 2211Likewise, the recommendation made by the Government -is not binding on the Court, and it is uncertain at this time what defendant's sentence { 24 wi be. Defendant aso has been advised and understands that, if the 25sentencing judge does not foow any of the parti~~~ sentencin~ 26 recommendations, defendant nevertheess has no right to withdraw the 27 pea Def. nitia~.12_ CR & 7-("

8 1 X 2 PARTES' SENTENCNG RECOMMENDATONS 3 A. SENTENCNG GUDELNE CALCULATONS 4 Athough the parties understand that the Guideines are ony 5 advisory and just one of the factors the court wi consider under U.S.C. 3553(a) in imposing a sentence, the parties wi jointy 7 recommend the foowing Base Offense Leve, Specific Offense BCharacteristics, Adjustments and Departures (if appicabe), based on the November 1, 2014 guideines: 1. Base Offense Leve [USSG 2D. 1] 32* Safety Vave (if appicabe) -2** [ 201.1(b) (17) and 5C. 2] 3. Acceptance of Responsibiity [ 3E1.1] Departure for Fast Track [ 5K3.1] -4*** *The parties agree that, if defendant is determined to be a career offender pursuant to USSG 4B. (a), the.. appicabe base offense eve sha be determined pursuant to USSG 4B.(b). Furthermore, the defendant wi be ineigibe for any roe reduction. **f defendant truthfuy discoses to the government a information and evidence the defendant has concerning the offense and reevant conduct, and if defendant otherwise quaifies for the "safety vave" in under SC. 2, the government wi recommend a two-eve reduction 2D. (b) (17) and reief from any statutory '.mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 5C.2. Defendant understands that, if he/she does not quaify under SC. 2, defendant may be.. subject to a statutory mandatory minimum sentence. ***The Government reserves the right to reduce its recommended departure if defendant does not proceed to sentencing on the first 8 Oef.. nitias~g~) _j _ c R r.~ "t 5"

9 111 date set by the Court, uness the parties agree to a continuance or 2sentencinq is continued on the Court's own motion. 3 B. ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSBLTY 4 11 Notwithstanding paragraph A. 2. above, the Government wi not 5recommend any adjustment for Acceptance of Responsibiity if defendant 6materiay breaches this pea agreement by any of the foowing: c Fais to truthfuy admit a compete factua basis for the pea at the time it is entered; Denies invovement in the offense, statements about that invovement, with the Court or probation officer; gives conficting or is untruthfu 3. Fasey denies prior crimina conduct or convictions; 4. Fais to appear in court; 5. Engages in additiona crimina conduct; 6. Attempts to withdraw the pea; 7. Fais to abide by any awfu court order; or 8. Contests or assists any third party in contesting the forfeiture of property(ies) seized or forfeited ' in connection with this case. FURTHER ADJOSTMBN'rS AND SENTENCE REDUCTONS NCLUDNG THOSE UNDER 18 U.S.C The parties agree that defendant may request or recommend additiona downward adjustments, departures, or sentence reductions 2111 under 18 U.S. C The Government may oppose any such downward 22adjustments, departures and sentence reductions not set forth in 231Section X, paragraph A above. 24 D. NO AGREEMENT AS TO CRMNAL HSTORY CATEGORY 2511 The parties have no agreement as to defendant's Crimina History 2 6 Category, except that, if de fen dan t is determined to be a Career Offender, the parties agree that the defendant is automaticay a 28 Crimina History Category V pursuant to USSG 4B.1 (b). Def. nitia~ 1 'cr r ~ :rr

10 1 E. "FACTUAL BASS" AND "RELEVANT CONDUCT" NFORMATON 2 11 The parties agree that the facts in the ~factua basis" paragraph 3of this agreement are true, and may be considered as ~reevant 4 conduct" under USSG 1B1.3 and as the nature and circumstances of the Soffense under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) (1). 6 F. PARTES' RECOMMENDATONS REGARDNG CUSTODY 711 The Government wi recommend that defendant be sentenced to the Biow end of the advisory guideine range as cacuated by the 11Government pursuant to this agreement. G. SPECAL ASSESSMENT 1111 The parties wi jointy recommend that defendant pay a specia assessment in the amount of $0. 00 to be paid forthwith at time of 13 sentencing. The specia assessment sha be paid through the office 14 of the Cerk of the District Court by bank or cashier's check or money 15order made payabe to the ~cerk, United States District Court." 16 B. SUPERVSED RELEASE 1711 The Government is free to recommend a period of supervised 18reease. f the Court imposes a term of supervised reease, defendant 111 agrees that he/she wi not ater seek to reduce or terminate eary 20the term of supervised reease unti he/she has served at east 2111 two-thirds of his/her term of supervised reease and has fuy paid 22and satisfied any specia assessments, fine, cr~~in~ forfeit~re 23judgrnent and restitution judgment. 24. MMGRATON CONSEQUENCES 25 Defendant recognizes that peading guity may have consequences 26with respect to his/her immigration status if he/she is not a citizeri 27of the United States. Under federa aw, a broad range of crimes are 28 removabe offenses, incuding the offense ( s) to which ' defendant is Def. nitias t - r &o --1 _u_~h f?.f j "'""

11 1 11 peading guity. Remova and other immigration consequences are the 2 11 subject of a separate proceeding, however, and defendant understands 3 that no one, incuding his/her attorney or the district court, can 4 predict to a certainty the effect of his/her conviction on his/her 5 immigration status. Defendant nevertheess affirms that he/she wants Gto pead guity regardess of any immigration consequences that 7 his/her pea may entai, even if the consequence is his/her automatic 8 remova from the United States. 11 X DEFENDANT WAVES APPEAL AND COLLATERAL ATTACK 1111 n exchange for the Government's concessions in this pea 12agreement, defendant waives, to the fu extent of the aw, any right 13 to appea or to coateray attack the conviction and any awfu 14 restitution order, except a post-conviction coatera attack based ori 1511a caim of ineffective assistance of counse. Defendant aso waives, 16to the fu extent of the aw, any right to appea or to' coateray attack the sentence uness the Court: ( 1) denies defendant's request 18 for a minor roe reduction pursuant to USSG 3B1.2(b), in which case 1 defendant may ony appea the denia of minor roe; or '(2) imposes a 2011custodia sentence above the high end of the guideine range (pursuant 2111 to USSG 5G1. 1) as cacuated by the Government at the time of 2211sentencing. However, the Government wi be free to support on appea 231the sentence actuay imposed. f defendant beieves the Government's 24 recommendation is not in accord with this agreement, defendant wi 25 object at the time of sentencing; otherwise the objection wi be 2611deemed waived f defendant breaches this pea agreement, at any time, in any 28 way, incuding, but not imited to, the reasons set forth in 11 Def. nitias,~ _CR (? 7C...

12 t iisection X.B. above, or, appeaing or coateray attacking the 2conviction or sentence, the Government may prosecute defendant for any 3counts, incuding those with mandatory minimum sentences, dismissed or 4 not charged pursuant to this pea agreement. Additionay, the 5 Government may use any factua admissions made by defendant pursuant Gto this pea agreement in any such prosecution. 711 X 8 CUMBS AFTER AUmST OR BREACH OF THE AGREEMENT WLL PERMT THE GOVERNMENT TO RECOMMEND A HGHER SENTENCE OR SET ASDE THE PLEA 11 This pea agreement is based on the understanding that, prior to 1111 defendant's sentencing in this case, defendant has not committed or 12 been arrested for any offense not known to the Government prior to 13 defendant's sentencing. This pea agreement is further based on the understanding that defendant has committed no crimina conduct since 15 defendant's arrest on the present charges, and that defendant wi 16commit no additiona crimina conduct before sentencing. f defendant 17 has engaged in or engages in addi tiona! crimina conduct during this 18 period, or breaches any of the terms of any agreement with the 111Government, the Government wi not be bound by the recommendations in 20this pea agreement, and may recommend any awfu sentence. n 2addition, at its option, the Government may move to s et aside the 22 pea. 23 X 24 ENTRE AGREEMENT i! j t 25 This pea agreement embodies the entire agreement between the 26 parties and supe-rsedes any other agreement, written or ora Def. nitias.,, -*=! _S_ CR ( 1 ~ S " - -

13 111 XV \ 2 MODFCATON OF AGREEMENT MUST BE N WRTNG 311 No modification of this pea agreement sha be effective uness 4in writing signed by a parties. 5 ~ 6 DEFENDANT AND COUNSEL FULLY UNDERSTAND AGREEMENT 711 By signing this agreement, defendant certifies that defendant has 8read it (or that it has been read to defendant in defendant's native anguage). Defendant has discussed the terms of this agreement with defense counse and fuy understands its meaning and effect. 11 ~ 12 DEFENDANT SATSFED WTH COUNSEL 1311 Defendant has consuted with counse and is satisfied with 14 counseis representation. This is defendant's independent opinion, 15 and his/her counse did not advise him/her about what to say in this 16 regard Respectfuy submitted, LAURA E. DUFFY United States Attorney 20 DATED ~ DATE~ 24 SHERR WALKER HOBSON Assistant/ U ~torney ~~ ~R~ Defense Counse Def. nitias (f!j:22_. _&_ CR /,{ "1.

14 .. \ 111 N ADDTON TO THE FOREGONG PROVSONS TO WHCH AGREE, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FACTS N THE "FACTUAL BASS" 2 PARAGRAPH ABOVE ARE TRUE. 3 4 DATED d;?_ff r-. Rev. /16/14:PSC:jam v ~~v e L i a Po.o~ r G. E LO PADLLA-ZEP DA Defendant Def. nitia~ i.._ cr urs

15 J,., i! ' ' i! 1 j ' 7 8 UNTED STATES OF AMERCA, 11 Paintiff, 1211 v. 13 EVELO PADLLA ZEPEDA UNTED STATES DSTRCT COURT SOUTHERN DSTRCT OF CALFORNA Defendant. ) Crimina No. 15 cr ~rs ) ) CONSENT TO RULE 11 PLEA ) N A FELONY CASE BEFORE ) UNTED STATES MAGSTRATE ) JUDGE ) ) ) ) 1611 have been advised by my attorney and by the 1711 United States Magistrate Judge of my right to enter my 18Upea in this case before a United States District 111 Judge. hereby decare my intention to enter a pea WH of guity in the above case, and request and consent 2111 to have my pea taken by a United States Magistrate ni Judge pursuant to Rue 11 of the Federa Rues of 23 Crimina Procedure. 24 understand that if my pea of guity i s taken by ~ the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Magistrate 2611 Judge recommends that the pea be accepted, the 2711 assigned United States District Judge wi then decide ~whether to accept or reject any pea agreement may 1

16 . / have with the United States and wi adjudicate guit 211and impose sentence. 311 further understand that any obje~tions to the 411Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation must be 511 fied within 14 days of the entry of my guity pea Dated: ~ ~ e VE( r'o Po.d/{(o. ~ =fendant f d t 11.. Dated: djf:/;), The United States Attorney consents to have.the 15pea in this case taken by a United States Magistrate 1611 Judge pursuant to Crimina Loca Rue D/(7 (_rs- 111 Dated:.As5stai1t United St:a-t:es 2011 Attorney \ ' r { f. 28 ~ 2

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P J-S46018-16 NON-PRECEDENTAL DECSON - SEE SUPEROR COURT.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANA Appeee N THE SUPEROR COURT OF PENNSYLVANA GABREL G. OCASO v. Appeant No. 2419 EDA 2015 Appea from the PCRA

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER. The Louisiana Professional Engineering and Land Surveying Board [hereinafter the

) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER. The Louisiana Professional Engineering and Land Surveying Board [hereinafter the Received LOUISIANA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING BOARD 9643 BROOKLINE AVENUE, SUITE 121 BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70809-1443 (225 925-6291 IN THE MATTER OF: C3E GEOMATICS LLC RESPONDENT MAR

More information

000002

000002 000001 000002 000003 000004 000005 000006 000007 000008 000009 000010 000011 000012 000013 000014 000015 000016 000017 000018 000019 000020 000021 000022 000023 000024 000025 000026 000027 000028 000029

More information

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19 8:15-cr-00116-JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA vs. Plaintiff, LA WREN CE MERRICK JR.,

More information

on the Appointment of Judges

on the Appointment of Judges Protoco on the Appointment of Judges to Commissions of Inquiry Adopted by the Canadian Judicia Counci August 2010 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 Cataogue Number: JU14-21/2010 ISBN: 978-1-100-16530-1

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-06-CR-W-FJG ) MICHAEL FITZWATER, ) ) ) Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-01-CR-W-FJG ) WILLIAM ENEFF, ) ) ) Defendant. )

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division (Cal. State Bar # ) 00 North Los Angeles Street Federal Building, Room 1 Los Angeles, California

More information

Case 1:10-cv RGA Document 129 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1811 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv RGA Document 129 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1811 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case :0-cv-00805-RGA Document 29 Fied 07/9/2 Page of 5 PageD #: 8 N THE UNTED STATES DSTRCT COURT FOR THE DSTRCT OF DELAWARE BRSTOL-MYERS SQUBB COMPANY, Paintiff, v. Civi Action No. 0-805-RGA TEVA PHARMACEUTCALS

More information

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295 Case :-cr-00-fmo Document Filed 0 Page of Page ID #: EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division RITESH SRIVASTAVA (Cal. Bar

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Adam L. Braverman United States Attorney Andrew P. Young (Illinois Bar No: 0) Mark W. Pletcher (Colorado Bar No: 01) Assistant U.S. Attorneys 0 Front Street, Room San Diego, CA 1 Tel: (1) -1 Email: andrew.p.

More information

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT Case 1:09-mj-00015-JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) V. ) ) DWAYNE F. CROSS, ) ) Defendant. ) Case

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-00106-01-CR-W-DW TIMOTHY RUNNELS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110 Case 2:12-cr-00030-JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CASE NO. 2: 12-CR-30-FtM-99

More information

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143 Case :0-cr-00-CJC Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney DENNISE D. WILLETT Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Santa Ana Branch JENNIFER L. WAIER Assistant

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR. NO. ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT DEFENSE COUNSEL: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY:,Esq.

More information

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)

More information

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CRIMINAL NO. 1-08 CR 428 ) V- ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1956(h) VIJAY K. TANEJA, j

More information

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation WIPO Arbitration and Mediation The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-MOST Training Course Geneva November 11, 2003 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSI~ii,ii~iJ~it~~RI\ COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSI~ii,ii~iJ~it~~RI\ COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR REHEARING i ' No. 206-CP-00357-COA _ FLED SEP. -5 207 N THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF MSSSS~ii,ii~iJ~it~~R\ COURT OF APPEALS LATRA SPRAGGNGS VERSUS STATE OF MSSSSPP PETTON FOR REHEARNG APPELLANT ORGNAL APPELLEE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 09-00296-02-CR-W-FJG ) ERIC G. BURKITT, ) ) ) Defendant.

More information

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No. U.S. Department of Justice Channing D. Phillips United States Attorney District of Columbia Judiciary Center 555 Fourth St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 September 12, 2016 Richard L. Scheff, Esq. Montgomery

More information

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y: United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia CLERK'S OFFICE Oainmao JUL 12 201 JAMES N. HATTEN, Ciork GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y: DQP0/ Giork UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board. that the Board lift the restrictions imposed by a

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board. that the Board lift the restrictions imposed by a . j BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLNA MEDCAL BOARD n re: Tuan A. Huynh, M.D., Respondent. AMENDED CONSENT ORDER This matter is before the North Caroina Medica Board ("Board" based on Tuan A. Huynh's, M.D. ("Dr.

More information

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKET NO. 3:1 OCR59-W v. PLEA AGREEMENT RODNEY REED CAVERLY NOW COMES the United States of America,

More information

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn Case 1:17-cr-00232-RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10 U.S. Department of Justice The Special Counsel's Office Washington, D.C. 20530 November 30, 2017 Robert K. Kelner Stephen P. Anthony Covington

More information

The Federal System. Unit 2

The Federal System. Unit 2 The Federa System Unit 2 What is it? System of government created by the U.S. Constitution that divides governmenta power between nationa and state governments. The Constitutiona Division of Powers The

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-06023-02-CR-SJ-DW ) STEPHANIE E. DAVIS, ) ) Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case 3:-cr-0354-BAS Document Filed /03/ Page of 3 l LAURA E. DUFFY United States Attorney VALERIE H. CHU Assistant Uniteq. States Attorney 3 California Bar No. 40 FRED SHEPPARD 4 Assistant United States

More information

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows: Case 1:16-cr-00024-CG Document 2 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATALIE REED PERHACS

More information

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80 Case :-cr-000-jak Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney PATRICK R. FITZGERALD Assistant United States Attorney Chief, National Security Division ELLEN LANSDEN (Cal.

More information

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

5 CRWIINAL NO. H UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DrVISIOlV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 v. 5 CRWIINAL NO. H-07-218-002 WILLIE CARSON, I11 5 PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America, by

More information

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No. Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FILED SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED

More information

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT Case &:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12 FARKANSA INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) JAMES IN OPEN COURT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, DATE FILED IN OPEN COURT D.C. vs. _ Defendant. CASE NO.: / CRIMINAL DIVISION: VIOLATION OF PROBATION/COMMUNITY

More information

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. ) IYMAN FARIS, ) a/k/a Mohammad Rauf, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 Case 1:17-cr-00102-MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 ^^^'-^ ^^^^ ^'-^^ AGREEMENT Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CRIMINAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-000297 03-CR-W-FJG ) RONALD E. BROWN, JR., ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL Case 3:17-cr-05226-RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL 06 2017 CLERY. U.S. DfST~ICT COURT WESTERN

More information

THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (Care and Protection of Children) ACT, 2000

THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (Care and Protection of Children) ACT, 2000 THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (Care and Protection of Chidren) ACT, 2000 Nationa Institute of Socia Defence Ministry of Socia Justice & Empowerment Government of India CONTENTS DISCLAIMER PAGE NO. Chapter -I PRELIMINARY

More information

Case 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114

Case 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114 Case 2:15-cr-00590-FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114 1 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney 2 LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division

More information

AFFIDAVIT OF KEITHADWAR IN PARTIAL OPPOSITION TO PETITION

AFFIDAVIT OF KEITHADWAR IN PARTIAL OPPOSITION TO PETITION FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/17/2016 05:33 PM INDEX NO. 652176/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A. Case 2:09-cr-00717-ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 1 DENNIS K. BURKE United States Attorney District of Arizona 2 Howard D. Sukenic 3 Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. 011990 Two

More information

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16 Judge Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEA TILE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. CR0-0 RSM ) I Plaintiff, v. PLEA AGREEMENT RICHARD W. GIBSON, Defendant. The United

More information

Case 8:16-cr WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. . U.S. Department of Justice

Case 8:16-cr WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. . U.S. Department of Justice W ~ Case 8:16-cr-00023-WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. U.S. Department of Justice ~._.J ~~~A~~ -- District o/maryland S_O_l_lt_h_er_n_D_i_vl_.s_io_n_------- Krist; O'Malley,HailingAddress: Office

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00297-05-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA D. JORDAN, ) ) Defendant.

More information

JUDICIARY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2016

JUDICIARY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2016 BILL No:03P.L.03Index NITIJELA OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS 37TH CONSTITUTIONAL REGULAR SESSION, 2016 s Repubic of the Marsha Isands Jepipiin Ke Ejukaan JUDICIARY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2016 Index

More information

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP) U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tl e SllvioJ. Mollo B11ilding One Safm Andrew's Pfo::a New York. NtlP York 10007 March 7, 2014 Arthur G. Jakoby, Esq. David

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 02-37A ) JOHN LINDH, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT Paul J.

More information

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI Case 2:12-cr-00059-AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 FILED IN OPEN COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MAY -9 2012

More information

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - MICHAEL COHEN, Defendant. x INFORMATION 18 Cr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x The Special Counsel charges:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION USDC IN/ND case 2:17-cr-00153-JVB-APR document 7 filed 11/17/17 page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V ) ) Cause No. 2:17

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case 1:08-cr-00523-PAB Document 45 Filed 10/13/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 AO 245B (Rev. 09/08) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. District of

More information

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24 Case :0-cr-0-R Document Filed /0/00 Page of 0 GEORGE S. CARDONA Acting United States Attorney CHRISTINE C. EWELL Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division WESLEY L. HSU (SBN: 0) Assistant

More information

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6 Case 3:16-cr-00148-K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6 ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2o:s APR 14 PM.3: 32 DALLAS DIVISION / Y CL rnx_...

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is For Court Use Only 1. My true full name is 2. I understand that I am pleading GUILTY / NOLO CONTENDERE and admitting the following offenses, prior convictions and special punishment allegations, with the

More information

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby Case 2:13-cr-00171-CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 FILED 2013 Aug-02 AM 10:20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA lub ~1Jf' -2 ANcl:l:fij UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 1.0 FeJRurftE NORTHERN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT BRYAN SCHRODER United States Attorney ADAM ALEXANDER Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh Avenue, #9, Room 253 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7567 Phone: (907) 271-5071

More information

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Reserved for Clerk s File Stamp COUNTY: PLAINTIFF: COUNTY OF EL DORADO PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEFENDANT: ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM FOR FELONIES

More information

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16 Case 3:17-cr-00083-HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16 IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR

More information

Lobbying Do s and Don ts. l Federal Lobbying Regulations

Lobbying Do s and Don ts. l Federal Lobbying Regulations 1 Lobbying Do s and Don ts Federa Lobbying Reguations Lobbying Do s and Don ts what is obbying? federa obbying reguations Lobbying occurs when... (an entity) urges a egisative officia to take a position

More information

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1109 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:06-cr-00308-AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Connecticut Connecticut Financial Center 157 Church Street (203) 821-3700 rd 23

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARBARA BYRD-BENNETT No. 15 CR 620 Hon. Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of New Jersey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of New Jersey - Judgment - -.- - Case 2:14-cr-00277-JLL Document 57 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 6 PageD: 992 OctAO 245B (Mod. D/NJ 12/06) Sheet 1 in a Criminal Case UNTED STATES DSTRCT COURT District of New Jersey UNTED

More information

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs Case 5:13-cr-50004-PKH Document 106 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 538 IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs AUG 2 6

More information

Board of County Commissioners AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Board of County Commissioners AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Board of County Commissioners AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Agenda Date: 12/05/2017 Date Created: 11/22/2017 Agenda Item #: Created by: Presenter: Jeremy Davis, Panner, Senior - Resource Stewardship - 360-754-3355

More information

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80 Case :-cr-00-rgk Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division ASHWIN JANAKIRAM (Cal. Bar

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-00035-01-CR-W-HFS GAGE S. LANKAS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

APPLICATION FOR ACCELERATED REHABILITATIVE DISPOSITION

APPLICATION FOR ACCELERATED REHABILITATIVE DISPOSITION IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : OTN # : v : CP-14-CR- - : : (name of applicant) APPLICATION FOR ACCELERATED REHABILITATIVE DISPOSITION To the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, KEVIN CLARK, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT '3: 11~_;-z_ (0! The United States

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice KARIN J. IMMERGUT, OSB #96314 United States Attorney District of Oregon CHARLES F. GORDER, JR., OSB #91287 PAMALA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00026-02-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA S. MARTIN, ) ) Defendant.

More information

c~'\j s~ \ ~4. 'l v--e los

c~'\j s~ \ ~4. 'l v--e los Case 1:15-cr-00370-JHR Document 21 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 89,1 I' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LY"{ s~ \ ~~v\ve.lns ( (Defendant's Name) Mag./Crim.

More information

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT Case 1:18-cr-00114-LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ig F«ssw ^23 P b! 09 MiOEPOSITORY DARREN B. STRATTON PLEA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH CONLEY No. 12 CR 986 Judge Gary Feinerman PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the

More information

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STA [ES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CR- CRAIG HILBORN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT 1. The United States of America, by its attorneys,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS VRANAS No. 15 CR 620 Judge Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the

More information

Case 2:14-cr JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100

Case 2:14-cr JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100 Case 2:14-cr-00639-JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100 1 ANDRE BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney 2 ROBERT E. DUGDALE '.Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division

More information

Winning at Litigation

Winning at Litigation Winning at Litigation Featuring Shane Read EARN UP TO 14 CLE 2 EPR Winning at Deposition Day One Live Seminar: Thursday, May 7, 2015 Miwaukee Live Webcast: Thursday, May 7, 2015 Webcast Repay: Monday,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN ) Filed April 0, 00 LIDIA SPIROFF (CSBN ) SIDNEY A. MAJALYA (CSBN 00) LARA M. KROOP (CSBN ) Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice 0 Golden Gate Avenue Box 0, Room -01 San Francisco,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-00261-02-CR-W-GAF ) WILLIAM TROY GOINGS, ) ) Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice KARIN J. IMMERGUT, OSB #96314 United States Attorney District of Oregon CHARLES F. GORDER, JR., OSB #91287 PAMALA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION Case 2:10-cr-00027-DWM Document 5 Filed 12/29/10 Page 1 of 5 PAULETTE L. STEWART Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney s Office 901 Front Street, Suite 1100 Helena, MT 59626 Phone: (406) 457-5120 FAX:

More information

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A Acquittal a decision of not guilty. Advisement a court hearing held before a judge to inform the defendant about the charges against

More information

I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career.

I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career. Dear Friend and Colleague, I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career. This was the press release on February 23, 2004 from the Department of Justice: United States Attorney

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 12-06001-05-CR-SJ-GAF ) CHRISTINA GONZALEZ, ) ) Defendant.

More information

Circuit Court for Washington County Case No.:17552 UNREPORTED. Fader, C.J., Nazarian, Arthur,

Circuit Court for Washington County Case No.:17552 UNREPORTED. Fader, C.J., Nazarian, Arthur, Circuit Court for Washington County Case No.:17552 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1994 September Term, 2017 ANTHONY M. CHARLES v. STATE OF MARYLAND Fader, C.J., Nazarian, Arthur,

More information

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County State of Washington, Plaintiff vs.. Defendant No. Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty to Sex Offense (STTDFG) 1. My true name is:. 2. My age is:. 3.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Cr. No. H-02-0665 BEN F. GLISAN, JR., Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT Pursuant

More information

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7 Juvenile Proceedings Scripts - Table of Contents Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION

More information

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152) ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN 1 1 1 1 NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN 1) Original Filed //0 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS (CSBN ) MAY Y. LEE (CSBN ) BRIGID S. BIERMANN (CSBN 0) CHARLES P. REICHMANN (CSBN ) U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 10 CR 655 vs. ) ) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman SHAKER MASRI ) PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement

More information

STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.

STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE

More information

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORNELIS JAN SLOMP, A/K/A SUPERTRIPS No. 13 CR 689 Judge Matthew F. Kennelly PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Paintiff, V. : Civi Action No. 06-113-LPS DEY PHARMA., L.P., DEY, INC., MYLAN INC., and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS

More information

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement. What is an expungement? An expungement reopens your criminal case, dismisses and sets aside the conviction, and re-closes the case without a conviction. In effect, you are no longer a convicted person.

More information

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Commonweath of Massachusetts Executive Office of Heath and Human Services Department of Transitiona Assistance 600 Washington Street Boston MA 02111 y-p.= L/ 7 ;+/ (,jb M!:._-- ~~ Fax 97- Fied Operations

More information