000002
|
|
- Buck Jordan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 000001
2 000002
3 000003
4 000004
5 000005
6 000006
7 000007
8 000008
9 000009
10 000010
11 000011
12 000012
13 000013
14 000014
15 000015
16 000016
17 000017
18 000018
19 000019
20 000020
21 000021
22 000022
23 000023
24 000024
25 000025
26 000026
27 000027
28 000028
29 000029
30 000030
31 000031
32 000032
33 000033
34 000034
35 000035
36 000036
37 000037
38 000038
39 000039
40 000040
41 000041
42 000042
43 000043
44 000044
45 000045
46 000046
47 000047
48 000048
49 000049
50 000050
51 000051
52 000052
53 000053
54 000054
55 000055
56 000056
57 000057
58 000058
59 000059
60 000060
61 000061
62 '. Case 2:18-mj RBM Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 PageID.6 Page 1 of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. 14 Arturo ZAVALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, Defendant. The undersigned complainant being duly sworn states: Case No.: '18MJ COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF Title 31 U.S.C Bulk Cash Smuggling (Felony) On or about October 24, 2018, within the Southern District of California, defendant, Arturo ZAVALA, with the intent to evade a currency reporting requirement under Title 31, 21 United States Code, Section 5316, did knowingly and intentionally conceal more than $10, in United States currency or other monetary instruments, to wit: approximately $52, in United States currency, and attempt to transport or transfer such currency or 25 monetary instruments from a place within the United States to a place outside of the United States, in violation of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5332.
63 -, Case 2:18-mj RBM Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 PageID.7 Page 2 of 4 1 The complainant states this complaint is based on the attached Statement of -facts 2 incorporated herein by reference SWORN TO BEFORE ME AND SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE, THIS 24th DAY OF OCTOBER2018. ~~ENEGRO United States Magistrate Judge 2
64 l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. Arturo ZAVALA STATEMENT OF FACTS 5 This Statement of Facts is based on the reports, documents, and notes furnished to 6 Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Joseph Rawley. 7 8.t.-':t ~ On Octobe~ 2018, at approximately 12:28 a.m., Customs and Border Protection 9 Officers (CBPO) conducted an outbound vehicle inspection at the Calexico, California West lo Port of Entry when they encountered Arturo ZAVALA (ZAVALA) attempting to enter 11 Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico, in a black 2004 Ford F-150 bearing California license plates. 14 As part of the outbound vehicle inspection, the Ford F-150 was sent to vehicle 15 secondary for inspection before the vehicle entered Mexicali. Customs and Border Protection Officer (CBPO) P. McBee received a negative oral Customs declarations from ZAVALA. California identification card. ZAVALA is a United States citizen and was in possession of a 21 CBPO P. McBee asked ZAVALA if he had more than $10,000 in U.S. currency to Case 2:18-mj RBM Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 PageID.8 Page 3 of 4 declare, to which ZAVALA gave a negative customs declaration. ZAVALA stated he was on his way to Mexicali from Brawley, California. ZAVALA was escorted to vehicle 25 secondary where CBPO P. McBee conducted a pat-down ofzavala's person which was witnessed by Canine Enforcement Officer (CEO) Garneau which showed ZAVALA to be in possession of $3,164 of United States currency. 3
65 -. Case 2:18-mj RBM Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 PageID.9 Page 4 of 4 1 An inspection of ZAV ALA's vehicle revealed five (5) bundles of United States 2 currency located in a non-factory compartment in the dashboard of the Ford F A total amount of approximately $49, dollars in U.S. currency was 4 5 recovered from the non-factory compartment of the vehicle. The combined total of 6 U.S. currency located on ZAVALA's person and in the vehicle was $52,
66 Case 2:18-mj RBM Document 1-1 Filed 10/24/18 PageID.5 Page 1 of 1 ROSln\OT. First: Ar~uro Mid. Last: ZAVALA ~~~~~~ Case No. '18 MJ ~"'----~~~~ RAP SHEET SUMMARY CHART 37 Months ON PAROLE/PROBATION TOTAL POINTS 0 DATE OF MOST RECENT DEPORTATION
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83 0001
84 0002
85 0003
86 0004
87 0005
88 0006
89 0007
90 0008
91 0009
92 0010
93 0011
94 0012
95 0013
96 0014
97 0015
98 0016
99 0017
100 0018
101 0019
102 0020
103 0021
104 0022
105 0023
106 0024
107 0025
108 0026
109 0027
110 0028
111 0029
112 0030
113 0031
114 . Department of Justice ADAM L. BRAVERMAN United States Attorney Southern District of California San Diego County Ofice Federal Office Building 880 Front Street, Room 6293 San Diego, California 92 / Alicia P. Williams Assistant U.S. Attorney Imperial County Office 516 l ndustry Way SuiteC Imperial County, Cal/fornia 9225/-5782 (619) Fax (619) October 31, 2018 Marc S. Levinson, Esq Aero Dr. Suite, # San Diego, CA (619) levinson.marc@grnail.com Re: Pre-Indictment Offer in the case of U.S. v. GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, Case No. 18MJ11045 Dear Mr. Levinson: The Attorney General of the United States and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of California have approved a pre-indictment disposition for this case. You have already informed me that your client is interested in receiving the Government's offer and will either file a Waiver of a Preliminary Hearing or waive time at the preliminary hearing in order to have sufficient time to consider it. The terms of the preindictment offer are set forth in the enclosed plea agreement, provided your client complies with the following early disposition requirements: 1. No later than noon on the Friday preceding the Preliminary Hearing either file a Waiver of a Preliminary Hearing (which can be downloaded from the District Court's website at or confirm via that the Defendant will waive time at the Preliminary Hearing, 2. Inform me, via no later than five business days before the Arraignment Hearing, that your client will waive indictment at the hearing, 3. Waive indictment at the Arraignment Hearing, 4. Do not file or argue any substantive motions, including those described in Fed. R. Crim. P. 12, other than motions seeking bail review, 5. Plead guilty no later than two weeks after the Arraignment Hearing, 6. Return the original plea agreement, signed by you and your client, to me not later than five business days before the disposition date, 7. Waive appeal and collateral attack of the conviction and sentence, and, 8. Proceed to sentencing without undue delay. This offer may be accepted only by compliance with each of these requirements, including the requirement that your client plead guilty as specified above. Until the offer is accepted, the United States may in its sole discretion revoke the offer at any time and for any reason.
115 As part of a pre-indictment disposition, your client will plead guilty to an Information charging a violation of 18 U.S.C pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement I have enclosed with this letter. I have enclosed the Information and Waiver of Indictment that will be filed if your client wishes to accept this offer. I have also enclosed the original plea agreement pursuant to which your client must plead guilty. Finally, I have enclosed the currently available discovery. The terms of the plea agreement are not subject to modification, and you may not strike or interlineate any portion of the agreement absent joint agreement of the parties. Please review the enclosed documents and discovery promptly to determine whether issues exist which warrant discussion (e.g., incorrect factual basis, guideline calculations or criminal history information). If these issues are not promptly raised and the disposition of this case is delayed, that delay may cause a revocation of the offer. If you have any questions, please contact me at ( 619) Very truly yours, Enclosures (1) Information and Waiver of Indictment (2) Plea Agreement (3) Discovery Copy to: Addressee (Via - without Discovery) APW:tld Rev. 1 l /09(PSC:jam)
116 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, Defendant. Case No.: I N F O R M A T I O N Title 18, U.S.C., Section Fraud and Misuse of Visas, Permits, and Other Entry Documents (Felony) The United States Attorney charges: On or about October 23, 2018, within the Southern District of 14 California, defendant, GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, when applying for entry 15 into the United States at the Calexico, California East Port of Entry, 16 did knowingly use, attempt to use, and possess a document prescribed 17 by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized 18 stay or employment in the United States, namely, a United States Birth 19 Certificate and California Identification card, knowing it to have been 20 forged, counterfeited, altered, falsely made or otherwise unlawfully 21 obtained, in order to gain admission to the United States; in violation 22 of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1546(a). 23 DATED: 24 ADAM L. BRAVERMAN United States Attorney ALICIA P. WILLIAMS Assistant U.S. Attorney 28 APW:tld:10/ 31/2018
117 AO 455 (Rev. 1 / 09 ) Waiver o Indictment UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. V. WAIVER OF AN INDICTMENT GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, Defendant. I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me. After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by information. DATED: Defendant DATED: Defendant's Attorney JUDICIAL OFFICER
118 1 ADAM L. BRAVERMAN United States Attorney 2 ALICIA P. WILLIAMS Assistant United States Attorney 3 California Bar No United States Attorney's Office 880 Front Street, Room San Diego, California Telephone: (619) Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, V. GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. PLEA AGREEMENT (Pre-Indictment) IT IS HEREBY AGREED between plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 through its counsel, Adam L. Braverman, United States Attorney, and 18 Alicia P. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant, GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, with the advice and consent of Marc S. Levinson, counsel for defendant, as follows: II II II II II II II APW:tld:lOl3ll2018 Def. Initials
119 1 2 I THE PLEA 3 A. THE CHARGE 4 Defendant agrees to waive Indictment and plead guilty to a single- 5 count Information charging defendant with: 6 On or about October 23, 2018, within the Southern District of California, defendant, GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA, when applying for 7 entry into the United States at the Calexico, California East Port of Entry, did knowingly use, attempt to use, and possess 8 a document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the 9 United States, namely, a United States Birth Certificate and California Identification card, knowing it to have been 10 forged, counterfeited, altered, falsely made or otherwise unlawfully obtained, in order to gain admission to the United States; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1546(a) elements: A. ELEMENTS EXPLAINED II NATURE OF THE OFFENSE The offense to which defendant is pleading guilty has the following Defendant knowingly used, attempted to use, or possessed a document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States; and Defendant knew the counterfeited, altered, unlawfully obtained. document falsely had made, been forged, or otherwise 22 B. ELEMENTS UNDERSTOOD AND ADMITTED - FACTUAL BASIS 23 Defendant has fully discussed the facts of this case with defense 24 counsel. Defendant has committed each element of the crime and admits 25 that there is a factual basis for this guilty plea. The following facts 26 are true and undisputed: On or about October 23, 2018, defendant applied for admission to the United States via the Calexico, California East Port of Entry. 2 CR
120 Defendant knowingly presented a United States Birth Certificate and California Identification card, bearing the name and biographical information of another, for entry into the United States, as defendant's own identification Defendant knew the counterfeited, altered, unlawfully obtained. document falsely had made, been forged, or otherwise 6 III 7 PENALTIES 8 The crime to which defendant is pleading guilty carries the 9 following penalties: A. B. C. D. A maximum 10 years in prison; A maximum $250, fine; A mandatory special assessment of $ per count; and; A term of supervised release of not more than 3 years. Defendant understands that failure to comply with any of the conditions of supervised release may result in revocation of supervised release, requiring defendant to serve in prison, upon any such revocation, all or part of the statutory max imum term of supervised release for the offense that resulted in such term of supervised release. IV DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF TRIAL RIGHTS AND UNDERSTANDING OF CONSEQUENCES This guilty plea waives defendant's at trial right to: A. Continue to plead not guilty and require the Government to prove the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt; B. A speedy and public trial by jury; C. The assistance of counsel at all stages of trial; D. Confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses; E. Testify and present evidence and to have witnesses testify on behalf of defendant; and F. Not testify or have any adverse inferences drawn from the failure to testify. 3 Def. Initials CR
121 1 Defendant has been advised by counsel and understands that because 2 defendant is not a citizen of the United States, defendant's conviction 3 in this case makes it practically inevitable and a virtual certainty 4 that defendant will be removed or deported from the United States. 5 Defendant's attorney has told defendant this and defendant still wants 6 to plead guilty. Defendant may also be denied United States citizenship 7 and admission to the United States in the future. 8 V 9 DEFENDANT ACKNOWLEDGES NO PRETRIAL RIGHT TO BE PROVIDED WITH IMPEACHMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE INFORMATION 10 Any information establishing the factual innocence of defendant 11 known to the undersigned prosecutor in this case has been turned over 12 to defendant. The Government will continue to provide such information 13 establishing the factual innocence of defendant. 14 If this case proceeded to trial, the Government would be required 15 to provide impeachment information for its witnesses. In addition, if 16 defendant raised an affirmative defense, the Government would be 17 required to provide information in its possession that supports such a 18 defense. By pleading guilty, defendant will not be provided this 19 information, if any, and defendant waives any right to this information. 20 Defendant will not attempt to withdraw the guilty plea or file a 21 collateral attack on the existence of this information. 22 VI 23 DEFENDANT'S REPRESENTATION THAT GUILTY PLEA IS KNOWING AND VOLUNTARY Defendant represents that: A. Defendant has had a full opportunity to discuss all the facts and circumstances of this case with defense counsel and has a clear understanding of the charges and the consequences of this plea. By pleading guilty, defendant may be giving up, and rendered ineligible to receive, valuable government benefits and civic rights, such as the right to vote, the 4 Def. Initials CR -~-~- -~-----
122 B. C. D. right to possess a firearm, the right to hold office, and the right to serve on a jury. The conviction in this case may subject defendant to various collateral consequences, including but not limited to revocation of probation, parole, or supervised release in another case; debarment from government contracting; and suspension or revocation of a professional license, none of which can serve as grounds to withdraw defendant's guilty plea; No one has made any promises or offered any rewards in return for this guilty plea, other than those contained in this agreement or otherwise disclosed to the Court. No one has threatened defendant or defendant's family to induce this guilty plea. Defendant is pleading guilty because defendant is guilty and for no other reason. VII AGREEMENT LIMITED TO U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 This plea agreement is limited to the United States Attorney's 14 Office for the Southern District of California, and cannot bind any 15 other authorities in any type of matter, although the Government will 16 bring this plea agreement to the attention of other authorities if 17 requested by defendant. 18 VIII 19 APPLICABILITY OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES 20 The sentence imposed will be based on the factors set forth in U.S.C (a). In imposing the sentence, the sentencing judge 22 must consult the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) and 23 take them into account. Defendant has discussed the Guidelines with 24 defense counsel and understands that the Guidelines are only advisory, 25 not mandatory. The Court may impose a sentence more severe or less 26 severe than otherwise applicable under the Guidelines, up to the maximum 27 in the statute of conviction. Nothing in this plea agreement limits 28 5 Def. Initials CR -~~~
123 1 the Government's duty to provide complete and accurate facts to the 2 district court and the U.S. Probation Office. 3 The parties will recommend immediate sentencing without a 4 presentence report. The Court may agree if it finds sufficient 5 information in the record to enable the meaningful exercise of sentencing 6 authority pursuant to 18 U.S.C Defendant has been advised and 7 understands that should the sentencing judge order a presentence report, 8 defendant nevertheless has no right to withdraw the plea. 9 IX 10 SENTENCE IS WITHIN SOLE DISCRETION OF JUDGE 11 This plea agreement is made pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal 12 Procedure 11 (c) (1) (B) The sentence is within the sole discretion of 13 the sentencing judge who may impose the maximum sentence provided by 14 statute. It is uncertain at this time what defendant's sentence will 15 be. The Government has not made and will not make any representation 16 as to what sentence defendant will receive. Any estimate of the probable 17 sentence by defense counsel is not a promise and is not binding on the 18 Court. Any recommendation made by the Government at sentencing is also 19 not binding on the Court. If the sentencing judge does not follow any 20 of the parties' sentencing recommendations, defendant will not withdraw 21 the plea. 22 X 23 PARTIES' SENTENCING RECOMMENDATIONS A. SENTENCING GUIDELINE CALCULATIONS Although the Guidelines are only advisory and just one factor the 26 Court will consider under 18 U.S.C (a) in imposing a sentence, 27 the parties will jointly recommend the following Base Offense Level, 28 Specific Offense Characteristics, Adjustments, and Departures: 6 Def. Initials CR ~ ~---
124 1 1. Base Offense Level [ 2L2.2(a)] Prior Immigration Conviction [ 2L2.2(b ) (2)) _ l 3 3. Acceptance of Responsibility [ 3El~l] B. ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY 6 Despite paragraph A above, the Government need not recommend an 7 adjustment for Acceptance of Responsibility if defendant engages in 8 conduct inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility including, but 9 not limited to, the following: Fails to truthfully admit a complete factual basis as stated in the plea at the time the plea is entered, or falsely denies, or makes a statement inconsistent with, the factual basis set forth in this agreement; Falsely denies prior criminal conduct or convictions; Is untruthful with the Government, the Court or probation officer; or Breaches this plea agreement in any way C. FURTHER ADJUSTMENTS AND SENTENCE REDUCTIONS INCLUDING THOSE UNDER 18 U.S.C Defendant may request or recommend additional downward adjustments, departures, or variances from the Sentencing Guidelines under 18 U.S.C The Government will oppose any downward adjustments, departures, or variances not set forth in Section X, paragraph A above. 1 If defendant has previously sustained a conviction for a felony immigration and naturalization offense, the parties will recommend a +2 adjustment, pursuant to USSG 2L2.2(b ) (2) (A). If defendant has previously sustained two or more such felony immigration convictions, the parties will recommend a +4 adjustment, pursuant to USSG 2L2.2 (b) (2) (B). 7 Def. Initials CR
125 1 D. NO AGREEMENT AS TO CRIMINAL HISTORY CATEGORY 2 The parties have no agreement as to defendant's Criminal History 3 Category. 4 E. "FACTUAL BASIS" AND "RELEVANT CONDUCT" INFORMATION 5 The facts in the "factual basis" paragraph of this agreement are 6 true and may be considered as "relevant conduct" under USSG lbl.3 and 7 as the nature and circumstances of the offense under 18 U.S.C (a) (1) F. PARTIES' RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CUSTODY The Government agrees to recommend the greater of: low end of the 11 advisory guideline range as calculated by the Government, 60 days in 12 custody, or the time served in custody at the time of sentencing. 13 G. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, FINE, RESTITUTION, FORFEITURE Special Assessment: The parties will jointly recommend that defendant pay a special assessment in the amount of $ per felony count of conviction to be paid forthwith at time of sentencing. Special assessments shall be paid through the off ice of the Clerk of the District Court by bank or cashier's check or money order made payable to the "Clerk, United States District Court." Fine: The parties will not recommend imposition of a fine due to defendant's limited financial prospects and because the cost of collection, even taking into account the Inmate Responsibility Program, likely would exceed the amounts that could reasonably be expected to be collected. 22 H. SUPERVISED RELEASE 23 The Government is free to recommend a period of supervised release. 24 If the Court imposes a term of supervised release, defendant will not 25 seek to reduce or terminate early the term of supervised release until 26 defendant has served at least two-thirds of the term of supervised 27 release and has fully paid and satisfied any special assessments, fine, 28 criminal forfeiture judgment and restitution judgment. 8 Def. Initials CR
126 1 2 3 XI DEFENDANT WAIVES APPEAL AND COLLATERAL ATTACK Defendant waives (gives up) all rights to appeal and to collaterally 4 attack every aspect of the conviction and sentence, including any 5 restitution order. This waiver includes, but is not limited to, any 6 argument that the statute of conviction or Defendant's prosecution is 7 unconstitutional and any argument that the facts of this case do not 8 constitute the crime charged. The only exceptions are: (i) defendant 9 may appeal a custodial sentence above the high end of the guideline 10 range recommended by the Government at sentencing (if USSG, 5Gl.l(b) 11 applies, the high end of the range will be the statutorily required 12 mandatory minimum sentence); and (ii) defendant may collaterally attack 13 the conviction or sentence on the basis that defendant received 14 ineffective assistance of counsel. If defendant appeals, the Government 15 may support on appeal the sentence or restitution order actually imposed. 16 XII 17 BREACH OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT 18 Defendant and defendant's attorney know the terms of this agreement 19 and shall raise, before the sentencing hearing is complete, any claim 20 that the Government has not complied with this agreement. Otherwise, 21 such claims shall be deemed waived (that is, deliberately not raised 22 despite awareness that the claim could be raised), cannot later be made 23 to any court, and if later made to a court, shall constitute a breach 24 of this agreement. 25 Defendant breaches this agreement if defendant violates or fails 26 to perform any obligation under this agreement. The following are non- 27 exhaustive examples of acts constituting a breach: 28 A. Failing to plead guilty pursuant to this agreement; 9 Def. Initials --~~- CR
127 B. Failing to fully accept responsibility as established in Section X, paragraph B, above; C. Failing to appear in court; D. Attempting to withdraw the plea; E. Failing to abide by any court order related to this case; F. G. Appealing (which occurs if a notice of appeal is filed) or collaterally attacking the conviction or sentence in violation of Section XI of this plea agreement; or Engaging in additional criminal conduct from the time of arrest until the time of sentencing. If defendant breaches this plea agreement, defendant will not be 10 able to enforce any provisions, and the Government will be relieved of 11 all its obligations under this plea agreement. For example, the 12 Government may proceed to sentencing but recommend a different sentence 13 than what it agreed to recommend above. Or the Government may pursue 14 any charges including those that were dismissed, promised to be 15 dismissed, or not filed as a result of this agreement (defendant agrees 16 that any statute of limitations relating to such charges is tolled 1 7 indefinitely as of the date all parties have signed this agreement; 18 defendant also waives any double jeopardy defense to such charges). In 19 addition, the Government may move to set aside defendant's guilty plea. 20 Defendant may not withdraw the guilty plea based on the Government's 21 pursuit of remedies for defendant's breach. 22 Additionally, if defendant breaches this plea agreement: (i) any 23 statements made b y defendant, under oath, at the guilty plea hearing 24 (before either a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge); (ii) the factual 25 basis statement in Section II.Bin this agreement; and (iii) any evidence 26 derived from such statements, are admissible against defendant in any 27 prosecution of, or any action against, defendant. This includes the 28 prosecution of the charge(s) that is the subject of this plea agreement 10 Def. Initials CR ~----
128 1 or any charge(s) that the prosecution agreed to dismiss or not file as 2 part of this agreement, but later pursues because of a breach by the 3 defendant. Additionally, defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and 4 intelligently waives any argument that the statements and any evidence 5 derived from the statements should be suppressed, cannot be used by the 6 Government, or are inadmissible under the United States Constitution, 7 any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule ll(f) of 8 the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and any other federal rule. 9 XIII 10 CONTENTS AND MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT 11 This plea agreement embodies the entire agreement between the 12 parties and supersedes any other agreement, written or oral. No 13 modification of this plea agreement shall be effective unless in writing 14 signed by all parties. 15 XIV 16 DEFENDANT AND COUNSEL FULLY UNDERSTAND AGREEMENT 17 By signing this agreement, defendant certifies that defendant has 18 read it (or that it has been read to defendant in defendant's native 19 language). Defendant has discussed the tert1ls of this agreement with 20 defense counsel and fully understands its meaning and effect. 21 // 22 I I 23 I I 24 / / 25 / / 26 I I 27 / / 28 I I 11 Def. Initials CR
129 1 2 xv DEFENDANT SATISFIED WITH COUNSEL 3 Defendant has consulted with counsel and is satisfied with 4 counsel's representation. This is defendant's independent opinion, and 5 defendant's counsel did not advise defendant about what to say in this 6 regard Respectfully submitted, ADAM L. BRAVERMAN United States Attorney DATED DATED ALICIA P. WILLIAMS Assistant U.S. Attorney MARC S. LEVINSON Defense Counsel 16 IN ADDITION TO THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS TO WHICH I AGREE, I SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FACTS IN THE "FACTUAL BASIS" PARAGRAPH ABOVE 17 ARE TRUE DATED 20 GABRIEL MIRANDA-LONA Defendant 21 Approved by: :: ~ EY Assistant U.S. Attorney 12 Def. Initials ~~CR~~~~~-
130 0001
131 0002
132 0003
133 0004
134 0005
135 0006
136 0007
137 0008
138 0009
139 0010
140 0011
141 0012
142 0013
143 0014
144 0015
145 0016
146 0017
147 0018
148 0019
149 0020
150 0021
151 0022
152 0023
153 0024
154 0025
155 0026
156 0027
157 0028
158 0029
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR
DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division (Cal. State Bar # ) 00 North Los Angeles Street Federal Building, Room 1 Los Angeles, California
More information8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19
8:15-cr-00116-JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA vs. Plaintiff, LA WREN CE MERRICK JR.,
More informationCase 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295
Case :-cr-00-fmo Document Filed 0 Page of Page ID #: EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division RITESH SRIVASTAVA (Cal. Bar
More informationCase 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKET NO. 3:1 OCR59-W v. PLEA AGREEMENT RODNEY REED CAVERLY NOW COMES the United States of America,
More informationCase 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143
Case :0-cr-00-CJC Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney DENNISE D. WILLETT Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Santa Ana Branch JENNIFER L. WAIER Assistant
More informationCase 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 1:09-mj-00015-JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) V. ) ) DWAYNE F. CROSS, ) ) Defendant. ) Case
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR. NO. ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT DEFENSE COUNSEL: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY:,Esq.
More information1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:
Case 1:16-cr-00024-CG Document 2 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATALIE REED PERHACS
More informationEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. ) IYMAN FARIS, ) a/k/a Mohammad Rauf, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationinvolved in the transaction, full restitution, a special
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CRIMINAL NO. 1-08 CR 428 ) V- ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1956(h) VIJAY K. TANEJA, j
More informationGUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:
United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia CLERK'S OFFICE Oainmao JUL 12 201 JAMES N. HATTEN, Ciork GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y: DQP0/ Giork UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
More informationAT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16
Judge Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEA TILE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. CR0-0 RSM ) I Plaintiff, v. PLEA AGREEMENT RICHARD W. GIBSON, Defendant. The United
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-06-CR-W-FJG ) MICHAEL FITZWATER, ) ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-00106-01-CR-W-DW TIMOTHY RUNNELS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Adam L. Braverman United States Attorney Andrew P. Young (Illinois Bar No: 0) Mark W. Pletcher (Colorado Bar No: 01) Assistant U.S. Attorneys 0 Front Street, Room San Diego, CA 1 Tel: (1) -1 Email: andrew.p.
More informationCase 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI
Case 2:12-cr-00059-AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 FILED IN OPEN COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MAY -9 2012
More informationCase 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:17-cr-00102-MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 ^^^'-^ ^^^^ ^'-^^ AGREEMENT Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CRIMINAL
More informationCase 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80
Case :-cr-000-jak Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney PATRICK R. FITZGERALD Assistant United States Attorney Chief, National Security Division ELLEN LANSDEN (Cal.
More informationCase 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn
Case 1:17-cr-00232-RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10 U.S. Department of Justice The Special Counsel's Office Washington, D.C. 20530 November 30, 2017 Robert K. Kelner Stephen P. Anthony Covington
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 02-37A ) JOHN LINDH, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT Paul J.
More informationCase 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby
Case 2:13-cr-00171-CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 FILED 2013 Aug-02 AM 10:20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA lub ~1Jf' -2 ANcl:l:fij UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 1.0 FeJRurftE NORTHERN
More information5 CRWIINAL NO. H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DrVISIOlV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 v. 5 CRWIINAL NO. H-07-218-002 WILLIE CARSON, I11 5 PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America, by
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-06023-02-CR-SJ-DW ) STEPHANIE E. DAVIS, ) ) Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH CONLEY No. 12 CR 986 Judge Gary Feinerman PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-01-CR-W-FJG ) WILLIAM ENEFF, ) ) ) Defendant. )
More informationCase &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT
Case &:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12 FARKANSA INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) JAMES IN OPEN COURT
More informationCase 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.
Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FILED SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 09-00296-02-CR-W-FJG ) ERIC G. BURKITT, ) ) ) Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, KEVIN CLARK, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT '3: 11~_;-z_ (0! The United States
More informationCase 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110
Case 2:12-cr-00030-JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CASE NO. 2: 12-CR-30-FtM-99
More informationCase 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24
Case :0-cr-0-R Document Filed /0/00 Page of 0 GEORGE S. CARDONA Acting United States Attorney CHRISTINE C. EWELL Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division WESLEY L. HSU (SBN: 0) Assistant
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-000297 03-CR-W-FJG ) RONALD E. BROWN, JR., ) ) Defendant.
More informationUnited States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.
U.S. Department of Justice Channing D. Phillips United States Attorney District of Columbia Judiciary Center 555 Fourth St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 September 12, 2016 Richard L. Scheff, Esq. Montgomery
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN ) Filed April 0, 00 LIDIA SPIROFF (CSBN ) SIDNEY A. MAJALYA (CSBN 00) LARA M. KROOP (CSBN ) Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice 0 Golden Gate Avenue Box 0, Room -01 San Francisco,
More informationCase 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL
Case 3:17-cr-05226-RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL 06 2017 CLERY. U.S. DfST~ICT COURT WESTERN
More informationCase 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114
Case 2:15-cr-00590-FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114 1 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney 2 LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division
More informationFlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.
Case 2:09-cr-00717-ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 1 DENNIS K. BURKE United States Attorney District of Arizona 2 Howard D. Sukenic 3 Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. 011990 Two
More informationSTATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.
STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
CHAD C. SPRAKER Assistant U.S. Attorney PAUL JOSEPH Special Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office 901 Front St., Suite 1100 Helena, MT 59626 Phone: (406) 457-5120 Fax: (406) 457-5130 Email: chad.spraker@usdoj.gov
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is
For Court Use Only 1. My true full name is 2. I understand that I am pleading GUILTY / NOLO CONTENDERE and admitting the following offenses, prior convictions and special punishment allegations, with the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-00035-01-CR-W-HFS GAGE S. LANKAS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT
BRYAN SCHRODER United States Attorney ADAM ALEXANDER Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh Avenue, #9, Room 253 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7567 Phone: (907) 271-5071
More informationCase 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16
Case 3:17-cr-00083-HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16 IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal Number: v. : VIOLATION: Count One: JAMES STEVEN GRILES, : 18 U.S.C. 1505 (Obstruction of Proceedings Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Case 2:10-cr-00027-DWM Document 5 Filed 12/29/10 Page 1 of 5 PAULETTE L. STEWART Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney s Office 901 Front Street, Suite 1100 Helena, MT 59626 Phone: (406) 457-5120 FAX:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Cr. No. H-02-0665 BEN F. GLISAN, JR., Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT Pursuant
More informationCase 8:16-cr WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. . U.S. Department of Justice
W ~ Case 8:16-cr-00023-WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. U.S. Department of Justice ~._.J ~~~A~~ -- District o/maryland S_O_l_lt_h_er_n_D_i_vl_.s_io_n_------- Krist; O'Malley,HailingAddress: Office
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-00261-02-CR-W-GAF ) WILLIAM TROY GOINGS, ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 12-06001-05-CR-SJ-GAF ) CHRISTINA GONZALEZ, ) ) Defendant.
More informationcase 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6
case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)
More informationCase 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6
Case 3:16-cr-00148-K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6 ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2o:s APR 14 PM.3: 32 DALLAS DIVISION / Y CL rnx_...
More informationTYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Reserved for Clerk s File Stamp COUNTY: PLAINTIFF: COUNTY OF EL DORADO PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEFENDANT: ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM FOR FELONIES
More informationCase 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 1:18-cr-00114-LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ig F«ssw ^23 P b! 09 MiOEPOSITORY DARREN B. STRATTON PLEA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
USDC IN/ND case 2:17-cr-00153-JVB-APR document 7 filed 11/17/17 page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V ) ) Cause No. 2:17
More informationCase 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice Billy J. Williams United States Attorney District of Oregon 1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204-2902
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT SSN: DL#: PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. CAUSE NO.: DEFENDANT DOB: SSN: DL#: RACE: GENDER: ADDR: HAIR COLOR: EYE COLOR: PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY
More informationCase 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80
Case :-cr-00-rgk Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division ASHWIN JANAKIRAM (Cal. Bar
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 10-00025-01-CR-W-HFS ) KHALID OUAZZANI, ) ) Defendant. )
More informationCase 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STA [ES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CR- CRAIG HILBORN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT 1. The United States of America, by its attorneys,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARBARA BYRD-BENNETT No. 15 CR 620 Hon. Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00026-02-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA S. MARTIN, ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice KARIN J. IMMERGUT, OSB #96314 United States Attorney District of Oregon CHARLES F. GORDER, JR., OSB #91287 PAMALA
More informationPLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN
1 1 1 1 NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN 1) Original Filed //0 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS (CSBN ) MAY Y. LEE (CSBN ) BRIGID S. BIERMANN (CSBN 0) CHARLES P. REICHMANN (CSBN ) U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division
More informationRe: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tl e SllvioJ. Mollo B11ilding One Safm Andrew's Pfo::a New York. NtlP York 10007 March 7, 2014 Arthur G. Jakoby, Esq. David
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 12-CR-00189-DGK ) CAROL ANN RYSER, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA
More informationCase 2:14-cr JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100
Case 2:14-cr-00639-JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100 1 ANDRE BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney 2 ROBERT E. DUGDALE '.Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, DATE FILED IN OPEN COURT D.C. vs. _ Defendant. CASE NO.: / CRIMINAL DIVISION: VIOLATION OF PROBATION/COMMUNITY
More informationLIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1109 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00297-05-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA D. JORDAN, ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice KARIN J. IMMERGUT, OSB #96314 United States Attorney District of Oregon CHARLES F. GORDER, JR., OSB #91287 PAMALA
More informationCOURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS
COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Title... 2 Section 2. Purpose... 2 Section 3. Definitions... 2 Section 4. Fundamental Rights of Defendants... 4 Section 5. Arraignment...
More informationBackground. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - MICHAEL COHEN, Defendant. x INFORMATION 18 Cr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x The Special Counsel charges:
More informationUnlawfully Entering or Remaining in the United States. (1) (Apply the Greater) If the defendant committed the instant offense after sustaining
2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or Remaining in the United States (a Base Offense Level: 8 (b Specific Offense Characteristics (1 (Apply the Greater If the defendant committed the instant offense after sustaining
More informationSUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF
More informationThe court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON
The court process How the criminal justice system works. CONSUMER GUIDE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Inside The process Arrest and complaint Preliminary hearing Grand jury Arraignment
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 10 CR 655 vs. ) ) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman SHAKER MASRI ) PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Criminal Action v. ) No. 07-CR-00087-07-W-NKL ) MARK DELI SILJANDER,
More informationCase 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62
Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageD: 62 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District ofnew Jersey 970 Broad Street, 7hfloor 973-645-2700 Newark, New Jersey
More informationFILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008
Case 1:08-cr-00369-RJL Document 9 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 10 IL U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Fraud Section DecemberJ, 2008 Scott W. Muller, Esq. Angela T. Burgess, Esq. Davis Polk & Wardwell
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 3:-cr-0354-BAS Document Filed /03/ Page of 3 l LAURA E. DUFFY United States Attorney VALERIE H. CHU Assistant Uniteq. States Attorney 3 California Bar No. 40 FRED SHEPPARD 4 Assistant United States
More informationJUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
JUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Appearance Bond, Secured............................................................ MRCrP 8 Appearance Bond, Unsecured..........................................................
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL
DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 07/01/98 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor
More informationMODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850
RULE 3.987. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850 In the Circuit Court of the Judicial Circuit, in
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS VRANAS No. 15 CR 620 Judge Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the
More informationFLORIDA MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF FORM FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.
RULE 3.987. FLORIDA MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF FORM FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850 In the Circuit Court of the Judicial Circuit,
More informationCase 2:15-cr DJH Document 60 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 14 FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of FILED 0 ELIZABETH A. STRANGE First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona Wallace H. Kleindienst Carolyn Nedder Assistant U.S. Attorneys Arizona
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Criminal No. 99-233 v. ) ) Filed: 5/20/99 TOKAI CARBON CO., LTD., ) ) Judge Clarence C. Newcomer
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 (PERSONS IN STATE CUSTODY) 1) The attached form is
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Attorney, and the defendant, Kurt W. Donsbach, with the advice and
~, 3 4 5 6 ALAN D. BERSIN United PATRICK states Attorney K. O'TOOLE Assistant U.s. Attorney California state Bar No. 0858 United states Courthouse 880 Front street San Diego, California 91-8800 Telephone:
More informationSUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 13-00014-02-CR-W-DW ) CHRISTOPHER LEE CURD ) ) Defendant.
More informationUnited States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Connecticut Abraham Ribicoff Federal Building (860) 947-1101 450 Main Street, Rm. 328 Fax (860) 760-7979 Hartford, Connecticut 06103 www.usdoj.gov/usao/ct
More informationCOURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SEEKING RELIEF FROM FINAL FELONY CONVICTION UNDER CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.07 INSTRUCTIONS 1. You must use this
More informationCase 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8
Case 3:06-cr-00308-AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Connecticut Connecticut Financial Center 157 Church Street (203) 821-3700 rd 23
More informationCase 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14
Case 3:11-cr-00071-DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 11-71 (I) R I)') HORIZON LINES,
More informationI am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career.
Dear Friend and Colleague, I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career. This was the press release on February 23, 2004 from the Department of Justice: United States Attorney
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v., Defendant(s). Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The defendant(s), appeared for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 03-513-A ) ABDURAHMAN M. ALAMOUDI, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Eastern Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. Case No. 2:04-cr-88 NURADIN M. ABDI JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY Defendant. PLEA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOLTTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOLTTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED S'I'ATES OF AMERICA, ) 1 v.? Criminal No. 4:07-cr-434 ) BP PRODUCTS IVORTH AMEKICA INC. ) Honorable Gray
More information