CONTENTS PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. Chapter 1: Employment Discrimination 3. Chapter 2: Administrative Process 13

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CONTENTS PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. Chapter 1: Employment Discrimination 3. Chapter 2: Administrative Process 13"

Transcription

1 CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgements Practice and Procedural Tips A Note About the Cases Included and Case Editing xix xxiii xxi xxxiii PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS Chapter 1: Employment Discrimination 3 A. Introduction 3 B. Current Debate Theory v. Procedure 5 C. Employment Statutes 7 D. Constitutional Claims 10 E. State and Local Claims 11 F. This Book and Employment Discrimination Law 12 Chapter 2: Administrative Process 13 A. Introduction 14 B. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Justice 14 C. The Administrative Process 15 National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan 20 D. Standing and Coverage Requirements 27 Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates v. Wells 28 Mariotti v. Mariotti Bldg. Products, Inc. 35 E. Filing the Complaint 40 Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A. 40 Ashcroft v. Iqbal 45 F. Discovery, E-Discovery, and Summary Judgment 54 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Houston Funding II, Ltd. 56 xi

2 xii Contents G. Jury Trial 61 May v. Chrysler Group 62 H. Arbitration 68 Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips 69 I. Chapter-in-Review 75 PART TWO ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORKS Chapter 3: Disparate Treatment 79 A. Introduction 80 B. Circumstantial Evidence of Discrimination 80 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green 81 Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine 88 St. Mary s Honor Center v. Hicks 92 Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. 97 C. Direct Evidence of Discrimination 105 Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 106 D. Mixed-Motives Analysis/Civil Rights Act of Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa 114 Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc. 119 E. After-Acquired Evidence 120 McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. 120 F. Intentional Discrimination Framework: Summary Review 123 G. Systemic Litigation 125 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes 126 In re Bemis Co. 134 H. Further Defining Discrimination 137 Ricci v. DeStefano 138 I. Retaliation Coverage 148 Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP Protected Activity 151 a. Participation Clause 151 b. Opposition Clause Adverse Action 153 Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White 154

3 Contents xiii 4. Causation 158 University of Texas Sw. Medical Center v. Nassar Completing the McDonnell Douglas Framework Retaliation Review 167 J. Chapter-in-Review 168 Chapter 4: Disparate Impact 169 A. Introduction 169 Griggs v. Duke Power 170 Dothard v. Rawlinson 176 Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio 182 B. Statutory Framework 190 C. Subjective Criteria 193 Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust 193 D. Defenses The Bottom-Line Defense 199 Connecticut v. Teal Validation Studies as a Safe Harbor to Disparate Impact Claims 203 E. Chapter-in-Review 204 Chapter 5: Harassment 207 A. Introduction 208 B. Protected Categories of Harassment 209 Shaver v. Independent Stave Co. 209 C. The Harassment Cause of Action Because of Sex 211 Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. 211 Ocheltree v. Scollon Productions, Inc Unwelcome, and Severe or Pervasive 223 Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson 224 Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. 232 D. Imputing Liability 236 Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth 236 Faragher v. City of Boca Raton Supervisor Harassment 252 Vance v. Ball State University 252

4 xiv Contents 2. Co-Worker Harassment Constructive Discharge 262 Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders 263 E. First Amendment Defense 268 Lyle v. Warner Bros. Television Productions 269 F. Chapter-in-Review 274 PART THREE ENFORCEMENT BY PROTECTED CLASS Chapter 6: Race and Color Discrimination 279 A. Introduction 280 B. EEOC Guidance 281 C. Discrimination An Ongoing Problem 283 EEOC v. Pipefitters Ass n Local Union Henderson v. Irving Materials, Inc. 290 D. Reverse Discrimination Claims 296 McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. 296 E. Affirmative Action Plans 301 Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County 301 F. Chapter-in-Review 311 Chapter 7: Sex Discrimination 313 A. Introduction 314 B. Pregnancy as a Form of Sex Discrimination 315 Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. 316 Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. 321 C. The Family and Medical Leave Act 330 Makowski v. SmithAmundsen LLC 333 D. Sexual Orientation A Protected Category? 336 E. The Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Exception 339 Dothard v. Rawlinson 340 International Union, United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 347

5 Contents xv F. Grooming and Appearance Standards 356 Jespersen v. Harrah s Operating Co. 357 G. The Equal Pay Act and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act 363 Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. 365 King v. Acosta Sales & Marketing, Inc. 375 H. Chapter-in-Review 381 Chapter 8: National Origin Discrimination 383 A. Introduction 384 B. The Meaning of National Origin 385 Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co. 386 C. English-Only Rules 392 Garcia v. Spun Steak Co. 394 Maldonado v. City of Altus 405 D. Accent Discrimination 415 Fragante v. City & County of Honolulu 416 E. Undocumented Worker Status 422 Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. N.L.R.B. 423 F. Chapter-in-Review 430 Chapter 9: Religious Discrimination 431 A. Introduction 432 B. What Is Religion? 433 EEOC v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 434 C. Disparate Treatment Cases 439 EEOC v. Preferred Management Corp. 439 Moranski v. General Motors Corp. 447 D. Failure to Accommodate Cases 451 Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison 452 Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook 462 EEOC v. Unión Independiente de la Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico 468 E. Exceptions to Religious Discrimination Claims The Educational Exception 476

6 xvi Contents 2. The Religious Employer Exception The BFOQ The Ministerial Exception 479 Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC 480 F. Chapter-in-Review 490 Chapter 10: Disability Discrimination 493 A. Introduction Elements of the Cause of Action Disability and Qualified Defined 496 B. Actual, Perceived, and Record of a Disability 497 Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. 497 EEOC v. Heartway Corp. 507 Graham v. St. John s United Methodist Church 513 C. History of a Disability 517 Shaver v. Independent Stave Co. 517 D. Accommodation Requirement and the Interactive Process 520 U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett 521 Rauen v. U.S. Tobacco Manufacturing Ltd. Partnership 530 E. Direct Threat Defense and Qualification Standards 536 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal 537 F. Disparate Impact Claims 541 G. Unlawful Medical Inquiries and Examinations 542 H. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 544 I. Chapter-in-Review 545 Chapter 11: Age Discrimination 547 A. Introduction 548 B. Disparate Treatment Claims 550 Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 550 Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co. 555 Dediol v. Best Chevrolet, Inc. 561 C. The Meaning of Age 567 General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline 567 Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. 576

7 Contents xvii D. RFOA Defense and a Note About the BFOQ 579 E. Disparate Impact Claims 580 F. Exceptions for Police and Firefighters 582 G. Damages 583 H. Chapter-in-Review 585 PART FOUR REMEDIES Chapter 12: Relief in Discrimination Cases 589 A. Introduction 590 B. Reinstatement 590 C. Front Pay 592 D. Backpay 594 EEOC v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. 594 E. Compensatory Damages 600 Whitten v. Cross Garage Corp. 601 F. Punitive Damages 606 Kolstad v. American Dental Association 607 Philip Morris USA v. Williams 615 G. Other Damages 619 H. Liquidated Damages and the ADEA 620 I. Attorneys Fees 621 J. Chapter-in-Review 622 PART FIVE BEST PRACTICES Chapter 13: Handling Employment Discrimination Claims: Best Practices 625 A. Introduction 626 B. The Employee When to Complain of Discrimination 627 Jordan v. Alternative Resources Corp How and Where to Complain of Discrimination 637

8 xviii Contents 3. Drafting the Complaint 639 Mangum v. Town of Holly Springs 639 E.E.O.C. v. Concentra Health Services, Inc Protecting Against Retaliation 652 C. The Employer Effective Employer Policies 654 a. Dating Policies 654 Sarsha v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 656 b. Computer/Electronic Device Policies 659 Cargo v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 661 c. Antidiscrimination Policies 664 d. Anti-Bullying Policies 666 e. Responding to Reference Requests 667 Matthews v. Wisconsin Energy Corp. Inc. 669 f. Caregiving Responsibilities 674 Johnson v. University of Iowa Training Employees on Discrimination Documentation, Discipline, and Investigations 680 Toliver v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights Insulation from Liability 687 Staub v. Proctor Hospital 687 D. Chapter-in-Review 692 Index 00

.Wolters Kluwer Law & Business

.Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ASPEN PUBLISHERS CASES AND MATERIALS ON EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION Seventh Edition MICHAEL J. ZIMMER Professor of Law Seton Hall University CHARLES A. SULLIVAN Professor of Law Seton Hall University REBECCA

More information

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION NUMBER: 02

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION NUMBER: 02 SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND LABOR RELATIONS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR STUDIES & EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION

More information

The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant. Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.

The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant. Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Brief History Lesson At-will employment doctrine National Labor Relations

More information

In the Supreme Court of The United States

In the Supreme Court of The United States No. 08-441 In the Supreme Court of The United States JACK GROSS, Petitioner, v. FBL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

More information

Individual Disparate Treatment

Individual Disparate Treatment Individual Disparate Treatment Hishon v. King & Spalding (U.S. 1984) Title VII prohibits discrimination in compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment A benefit that is part and parcel

More information

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedications...v Board of Editors... vii v Foreword...xxxv xxix Preface... xxxvii xxxi Summary Table of Contents... xli xxxiii Chapter 1. An Overview... 1-1 1-1 Part I: Theories

More information

B. The 1991 Civil Rights Act and the Conflict between the Circuits

B. The 1991 Civil Rights Act and the Conflict between the Circuits Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Law By Louis Malone O Donoghue & O Donoghue A. Introduction Historically, federal courts have allowed the recovery of money damages resulting from civil rights

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv VMC-TBM.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv VMC-TBM. [DO NOT PUBLISH] NEELAM UPPAL, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-13614 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-00634-VMC-TBM FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH

More information

I. Failure to State a Claim

I. Failure to State a Claim IDENTIFYING A V AILABLE DEFENSES! ARNOLD W. "TRIP" UMBACH III STARNES DAVIS FLORIE LLP 100 BROOKWOOD PLACE, SEVENTH FLOOR BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35209 tumbach@starneslaw.com (205) 868-6000 WEBSITE: WWW.STARNESLAW.COM

More information

Legal Update: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation Law

Legal Update: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation Law November 7, 2012 Legal Update: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation Law Jeff Wedel jeffrey.wedel@squiresanders.com Tara Aschenbrand tara.aschenbrand@squiresanders.com Traci Martinez traci.martinez@squiresanders.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 13-50936 Document: 00512865785 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CRYSTAL DAWN WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant United States Court of Appeals Fifth

More information

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEE PRESENTS: EEO LAW BASICS SPRING 2006 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE EEO BASICS MATERIALS... 1

More information

Case 1:13-cv LG-JCG Document 133 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:13-cv LG-JCG Document 133 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:13-cv-00383-LG-JCG Document 133 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

More information

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AARP, AND EQUAL JUSTICE SOCIETY

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AARP, AND EQUAL JUSTICE SOCIETY No. 09-400 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States VINCENT E. STAUB, v. PROCTOR HOSPITAL, Petitioner, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF

More information

Supreme Court Narrows the Meaning of Supervisor and Clarifies Retaliation Standard. Michael A. Caldwell, J.D.

Supreme Court Narrows the Meaning of Supervisor and Clarifies Retaliation Standard. Michael A. Caldwell, J.D. Supreme Court Narrows the Meaning of Supervisor and Clarifies Retaliation Standard Michael A. Caldwell, J.D. Both public and private employers can rest a little easier this week knowing that the U.S. Supreme

More information

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE I. AGE DISCRIMINATION By Edward T. Ellis 1 A. Disparate Impact Claims Under the ADEA After Smith v. City of Jackson 1. The Supreme

More information

Investigating EEO complaints. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

Investigating EEO complaints. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Investigating EEO complaints Description: This is a course for EEO investigators (i.e., those who investigate the formal complaint and prepare a Report of Investigation (ROI). The topics covered include

More information

Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell

Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell (612) 604 6685 lpfeiffer@winthrop.com RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE TITLE VII

More information

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication... Preface... Acknowledgments... Summary Table of Contents... v vii xi xiii Chapter 1. The Evolution of Whistleblower Protections... 1-1 I. Historical Background...

More information

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit 268 OCTOBER TERM, 2000 Syllabus CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 00 866. Decided April 23, 2001

More information

Lawyers for employees breathed a

Lawyers for employees breathed a F O C U S MANAGED CARE LIABILITY Desert Palace v. Costa and Hill v. Lockheed Martin: One Step Forward, One Step Back by Ann Groninger Ann Groninger practices civil litigation and criminal defense with

More information

GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606

GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606 GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606 Section 1606.1 Definition of national origin discrimination. 1606.2 Scope of Title VII protection. 1606.3 The national security exception.

More information

2007 EMPLOYMENT LAW SYMPOSIUM July 20, 2007 Dallas, Texas

2007 EMPLOYMENT LAW SYMPOSIUM July 20, 2007 Dallas, Texas RETALIATION CLAIMS AFTER BURLINGTON NORTHERN V. WHITE MARLOW J. MULDOON II Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202 214-712-9500 214-712-9540 (fax) marlow.muldoon@cooperscully.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-LENARD/GOODMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-LENARD/GOODMAN Case 1:15-cv-20561-JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2015 Page 1 of 16 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 12-484 In the Supreme Court of the United States UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, PETITIONER v. NAIEL NASSAR ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH

More information

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101 Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101 Presenter: Glendora C. Hughes General Counsel Maryland Commission on Civil Rights 5/12/2015 1 Discrimination Protections Maryland

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:107

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:107 Case: 1:12-cv-09795 Document #: 24 Filed: 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:107 JACQUELINE B. BLICKLE v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff,

More information

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE I. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Judiciary of Guam ( Judiciary ) is an equal employment opportunity employer. It is the policy

More information

EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: 2001 TERM

EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: 2001 TERM EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: 2001 TERM The United States Supreme Court addressed several critical issues of employment law during its 2001 term. 1 This Article reviews those decisions. I. PROCEEDINGS

More information

Claiming Employment Discrimination in New Mexico under State and Federal Law

Claiming Employment Discrimination in New Mexico under State and Federal Law 21 N.M. L. Rev. 415 (Spring 1991 1991) Spring 1991 Claiming Employment Discrimination in New Mexico under State and Federal Law David L. Ceballes Recommended Citation David L. Ceballes, Claiming Employment

More information

Formalism and Employer Liability Under Title VII

Formalism and Employer Liability Under Title VII University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Law & Economics Working Papers 1-1-2013 Formalism and Employer Liability Under Title VII Samuel R. Bagenstos University

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No CHRYSOULA J. KOMIS, Appellant SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No CHRYSOULA J. KOMIS, Appellant SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-3813 CHRYSOULA J. KOMIS, Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR On Appeal from the United States District

More information

Smith v. City of Jackson: Does It Really Open New Opportunities for ADEA Plaintiffs to Recover Under a Disparate Impact Theory?

Smith v. City of Jackson: Does It Really Open New Opportunities for ADEA Plaintiffs to Recover Under a Disparate Impact Theory? Smith v. City of Jackson: Does It Really Open New Opportunities for ADEA Plaintiffs to Recover Under a Disparate Impact Theory? DONALD J. SPERO * I. INTRODUCTION... 184 II. THE ORIGIN OF DISPARATE IMPACT...

More information

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 The Civil Rights Act of 1991 EDITOR'S NOTE: The text of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166), as enacted on November 21, 1991, appears below with the following modifications: 1. The text of the

More information

by DAVID P. TWOMEY* 2(a) (2006)). 2 Pub. L. No , 704, 78 Stat. 257 (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 3(a) (2006)).

by DAVID P. TWOMEY* 2(a) (2006)). 2 Pub. L. No , 704, 78 Stat. 257 (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 3(a) (2006)). Employee retaliation claims under the Supreme Court's Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. White decision: Important implications for employers Author: David P. Twomey Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1459

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Tracy J. Douglas, ) Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02882-JMC ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ORDER AND OPINION Aiken Regional Medical

More information

Avoiding and Handling Retaliation Claims

Avoiding and Handling Retaliation Claims Avoiding and Handling Retaliation Claims Presented By: Jonathan Hancock, Esq. 165 Madison Avenue Suite 2000 Memphis, Tennessee Email: jhancock@bakerdonelson.com Phone: 901.577.8202 2010 Baker, Donelson,

More information

Question and Instruction on Retaliation under Texas Whistleblower Act

Question and Instruction on Retaliation under Texas Whistleblower Act PJC 107.4 Question and Instruction on Retaliation under Texas Whistleblower Act QUESTION Was Paul Payne s report [insert matter reported] made in good faith and a cause of Don Davis s [terminating, suspending,

More information

The Tort Label. Florida Law Review. Sandra F. Sperino. Volume 66 Issue 3 Article 3. February 2015

The Tort Label. Florida Law Review. Sandra F. Sperino. Volume 66 Issue 3 Article 3. February 2015 Florida Law Review Volume 66 Issue 3 Article 3 February 2015 The Tort Label Sandra F. Sperino Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 560 U. S. (2010) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of

More information

Labor, Employment, and HR Law Update ( ) Aaron L. Zandy, SPHR, Esquire FordHarrison LLP (407)

Labor, Employment, and HR Law Update ( ) Aaron L. Zandy, SPHR, Esquire FordHarrison LLP (407) Labor, Employment, and HR Law Update (2013-2014) Aaron L. Zandy, SPHR, Esquire FordHarrison LLP (407) 418-2304 azandy@fordharrison.com Presentation Roadmap Supreme Court Update (2013-2014) 2014 Proposed

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA I. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA I. INTRODUCTION HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON GARY MESMER, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiff, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,

More information

KRUPIN O'BRIEN LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1156 FIFTEENTH STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C

KRUPIN O'BRIEN LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1156 FIFTEENTH STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C KRUPIN O'BRIEN LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1156 FIFTEENTH STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 TELEPHONE (202) 530-0700 FACSIMILE (202) 530-0703 American Bar Association Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 539 U. S. (2003) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of

More information

Drew M. Capuder CAPUDER FANTASIA PLLC

Drew M. Capuder CAPUDER FANTASIA PLLC Manchin Professional Building 1543 Fairmont Avenue, Suite 207 Fairmont, West Virginia 26554 Voice: 304-333-5261 Fax: 304-367-1868 Email: dcapuder@capuderfantasia.com Web: www.capuderfantasia.com Hot Topics:

More information

Case 8:05-cv GLS-DRH Document 31 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 21

Case 8:05-cv GLS-DRH Document 31 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 21 Case 8:05-cv-00506-GLS-DRH Document 31 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAREN TENNEY, Plaintiff, v. 1:05-CV-0506 (GLS\DRH) ESSEX COUNTY/ HORACE NYE

More information

Employment Law Update and Trends

Employment Law Update and Trends Employment Law Update and Trends Recent and Pending US Supreme Court Cases EEOC's Current Focus and Priority Areas of Enforcement Trends in Employment Laws Presented By: Meredith Sayre Carlsmith BallLLP

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No MICHELLE PRECIA JONES,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No MICHELLE PRECIA JONES, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-3814 MICHELLE PRECIA JONES, v. PRECEDENTIAL Appellant SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; ALFRED OUTLAW On Appeal from the United

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 11-2502 DEBORAH COOK, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, IPC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 14-30204 Document: 00512826702 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT JOANNE STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant United States Court of Appeals Fifth

More information

A (800) (800)

A (800) (800) No. 16-464 In the Supreme Court of the United States TERRANCE J. LAVIGNE, Petitioner, v. CAJUN DEEP FOUNDATIONS, L.L.C., Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. VICKY S. CRAWFORD, Petitioner,

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. VICKY S. CRAWFORD, Petitioner, NO. 06-1595 In the Supreme Court of the United States VICKY S. CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United

More information

DEFENSE ANALYSIS UNDER FARAGHER/ELLERTH OF MS. STRONG S SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS:

DEFENSE ANALYSIS UNDER FARAGHER/ELLERTH OF MS. STRONG S SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS: DEFENSE ANALYSIS UNDER FARAGHER/ELLERTH OF MS. STRONG S SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS: ANNOTATED OUTLINE FOR DRAFTING ARBITRATION BRIEF OF DEFENDANT HEALTHY, WEALTHY & WISE Andrew M. Altschul Edward J.

More information

CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION

CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION First, we describe the projected future diverse workforce. Then we describe diversity and diversity

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv MSS-GJK.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv MSS-GJK. SHARON BENTLEY, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-11617 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv-01102-MSS-GJK [DO NOT PUBLISH] FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 14-51320 Document: 00513303428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT MARGIE BRANDON, United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December

More information

COUNSEL JUDGES OPINION by the State of New Mexico. All rights reserved.

COUNSEL JUDGES OPINION by the State of New Mexico. All rights reserved. 1 NAVA V. CITY OF SANTA FE, 2004-NMSC-039, 136 N.M. 647, 103 P.3d 571 DEANNA NAVA, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA FE, a municipality under state law, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

More information

A Comprehensive Review of Revised Article 9

A Comprehensive Review of Revised Article 9 A Comprehensive Review of Revised Article 9 A Comprehensive Review of Revised Article 9 Willa E. Gibson Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina Copyright 2007 Willa E. Gibson All Rights Reserved

More information

Phoenix District EEOC Office Legal Update. Mary Jo O Neill, Regional Attorney, November

Phoenix District EEOC Office Legal Update. Mary Jo O Neill, Regional Attorney, November Phoenix District EEOC Office Legal Update Mary Jo O Neill, Regional Attorney, November 15 2011 AGENDA: Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions. Court Victories by EEOC Phoenix District Office. Court

More information

The Supreme Court's Anti-Retaliation Principle

The Supreme Court's Anti-Retaliation Principle University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln College of Law, Faculty Publications Law, College of 2010 The Supreme Court's Anti-Retaliation Principle Richard E. Moberly

More information

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, PETITIONER, v. NAIEL NASSAR, M.D., RESPONDENT.

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, PETITIONER, v. NAIEL NASSAR, M.D., RESPONDENT. NO. 12-484 In the Supreme Court of the United States UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, PETITIONER, v. NAIEL NASSAR, M.D., RESPONDENT. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 05-259 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BURLINGTON NORTHERN

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * EDWIN ASEBEDO, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 17, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. KANSAS

More information

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VICKY S. CRAWFORD, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE,

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VICKY S. CRAWFORD, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, No. 06-1595 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VICKY S. CRAWFORD, v. Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United

More information

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 Page 1 of 18 The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission The Civil Rights Act of 1991 EDITOR'S NOTE: The text of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166), as enacted on November 21, 1991, appears

More information

REED V. UAW: AN ADVERSE RULING ON ADVERSE ACTION

REED V. UAW: AN ADVERSE RULING ON ADVERSE ACTION REED V. UAW: AN ADVERSE RULING ON ADVERSE ACTION Nathan J. McGrath INTRODUCTION The United States of America is a country that is famously known for, among other laudable virtues, its commitment to the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Plaintiff, DUNBAR DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Unhed 3tatal

More information

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT No. 11-5117 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT JORGE PONCE Appellant, v. JAMES H. BILLINGTON, LIBRARIAN, UNITED STATES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE

More information

SMU Law Review. Lindsey Watkins. Volume 58. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr. Recommended Citation

SMU Law Review. Lindsey Watkins. Volume 58. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr. Recommended Citation SMU Law Review Volume 58 2005 Employment Discrimination - Age Discrimination - The Fifth Circuit Holds a Plaintiff May Utilize the Mixed-Motives Method of Analysis in Age Discrimination Cases, Absent any

More information

Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Application To Immigrant Workers

Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Application To Immigrant Workers Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Application To Immigrant Workers Elizabeth Grossman EEOC Regional Attorney, New York April 5, 2012 What is the EEOC? Federal Government agency Enforces

More information

CLASS-BASED ADJUDICATION OF TITLE VII CLAIMS IN THE AGE OF THE ROBERTS COURT

CLASS-BASED ADJUDICATION OF TITLE VII CLAIMS IN THE AGE OF THE ROBERTS COURT CLASS-BASED ADJUDICATION OF TITLE VII CLAIMS IN THE AGE OF THE ROBERTS COURT Boston University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No. 15-09 (March 5, 2015) ) Michael C. Harper Boston

More information

Legal Update. Fire Districts Association of California (FDAC) 2017 Annual Conference April 5, 2017

Legal Update. Fire Districts Association of California (FDAC) 2017 Annual Conference April 5, 2017 Legal Update Fire Districts Association of California (FDAC) 2017 Annual Conference April 5, 2017 Presented by: Geoffrey S. Sheldon and Morin I. Jacob Legislation SB 1221 Behavioral Health Training for

More information

Appeal: 13-2278 Doc: 26 Filed: 03/20/2014 Pg: 1 of 77 RECORD NO. 13-2278 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT J. NEIL DEMASTERS, v. Plaintiff - Appellant, CARILION CLINIC; CARILION

More information

Employer Liability and Title VII: Recent U.S. Supreme Court Guidance on Supervisor Conduct and Retaliation

Employer Liability and Title VII: Recent U.S. Supreme Court Guidance on Supervisor Conduct and Retaliation Employer Liability and Title VII: Recent U.S. Supreme Court Guidance on Supervisor Conduct and Retaliation Presented by Jonathan S. Parritz Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP jon.parritz@maslon.com p 612.672.8334

More information

CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION...40

CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION...40 40 CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION...40 1. Professional Standards Applicable to Management s Employment Decisions...40

More information

Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts

Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts Presented By: Keji A. Ayorinde, Assistant General Counsel, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

More information

Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division

Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division Order Code RS22686 June 28, 2007 Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act: A Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court s Decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. Summary

More information

Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments Civil Rights. Amendments Civil Rights

Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments Civil Rights. Amendments Civil Rights Amendments 11-12 The Clean Up Amendment XI - State Citizenship Date Ratified - Feb. 7, 1795 Date Passed by Congress - Mar. 4, 1794 What it does - Prohibits a citizen of another state or country from suing

More information

Case 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 1:14-cv-00215-MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TINA DEETER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 14-215E

More information

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States CITY OF CHICAGO,

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States CITY OF CHICAGO, No. 08-974 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ARTHUR L. LEWIS, JR., et al., v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Petitioners, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh

More information

Plaintiff, 1:14-CV-0771 (LEK/RFT) Defendant. MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff, 1:14-CV-0771 (LEK/RFT) Defendant. MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HUA LIN, Plaintiff, -against- 1:14-CV-0771 (LEK/RFT) NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant. MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION

More information

Civil Rights. New Employee Orientation March 2018

Civil Rights. New Employee Orientation March 2018 Civil Rights New Employee Orientation March 2018 Overview A history of Civil Rights Legislation Discrimination Law What does this mean to me and my job? Discrimination may be legal Distinguishing between

More information

FACULTY MASTER AGREEMENT

FACULTY MASTER AGREEMENT FACULTY MASTER AGREEMENT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #882 AND EDUCATION MINNESOTA - MONTICELLO Effective Dates: July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017 MONTICELLO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACULTY MASTER CONTRACT TABLE

More information

DEPENDS. year! unlawful procedures in the workplace. in the workplace.

DEPENDS. year! unlawful procedures in the workplace. in the workplace. WHAT IS IS AN AN ADVERSE ADVERSE ACTION? ACTION? WELL, IT WELL, IT DEPENDS By: Michelle J. Douglass, J. Douglass, Esquire Esquire The Law Office Office of Michelle of Michelle J Douglass, J Douglass, L.L.C.

More information

NAACP v. Town of Harrison: Applying Title VII Disparate Impact Analysis to Municipal Residency Requirements

NAACP v. Town of Harrison: Applying Title VII Disparate Impact Analysis to Municipal Residency Requirements Volume 37 Issue 2 Article 5 1992 NAACP v. Town of Harrison: Applying Title VII Disparate Impact Analysis to Municipal Residency Requirements James C. King Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr

More information

Dancing with the Supremes: L&E Issues in the Supreme Court this Year

Dancing with the Supremes: L&E Issues in the Supreme Court this Year Dancing with the Supremes: L&E Issues in the Supreme Court this Year Edward R. Young Steven W. Fulgham Baker Donelson Baker Donelson 901.577.2341 901.577.2386 eyoung@bakerdonelson.com sfulgham@bakerdonelson.com

More information

WHAT IS MY CASE WORTH

WHAT IS MY CASE WORTH ABA SECTION OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW S ANNUAL MEETING August 8, 2005 WHAT IS MY CASE WORTH Melinda J. Caterine Moon, Moss & Shapiro, P.A. Ten Free Street P.O. Box 7250 Portland, ME 04112-7250 (207)

More information

Individual Liability of Supervisors for Sexual Harrassment Under Title VII: Courts' Reliance on the Rules of Statutory Construction

Individual Liability of Supervisors for Sexual Harrassment Under Title VII: Courts' Reliance on the Rules of Statutory Construction Boston College Law Review Volume 42 Issue 2 Number 2 Article 5 3-1-2001 Individual Liability of Supervisors for Sexual Harrassment Under Title VII: Courts' Reliance on the Rules of Statutory Construction

More information

FOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case

FOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case DOCKET # cv (2-3 letter city code) EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION PROJECT CODING FORM 1. Case name: 2. a) Judicial division and district: NDIL NDCA EDPA SDNY NDTX NDGA EDLA b) Case location: Federal Records

More information

MARALYN S. JAMES, Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Respondent. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION

MARALYN S. JAMES, Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Respondent. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION MARALYN S. JAMES, Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DR. RACHEL TUDOR, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CIV-15-324-C SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY and THE REGIONAL UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

More information

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES A BILL

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES A BILL TH CONGRESS D SESSION S. ll To restore the effective use of group actions for claims arising under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of, title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of, title V of the

More information

Public Sector Employment Law Update League of California Cities 2014 City Attorneys Spring Conference

Public Sector Employment Law Update League of California Cities 2014 City Attorneys Spring Conference Public Sector Employment Law Update League of California Cities 2014 City Attorneys Spring Conference Presented By: Richard S. Whitmore Employment Applications AB 218 Ban the Box Legislation Limits the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REBECCA J. SCUFFLE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:14cv708 ) Electronic Filing WHEATON & SONS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION Plaintiff

More information

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is proposing revisions to its

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is proposing revisions to its [6570-01-P] EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 29 CFR Part 1614 RIN Number: 3046-AA73 Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). ACTION: Notice

More information

Employee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure

Employee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure ACAB R EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Employee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure [NOTE: Our legal counsel recommends we expand this procedure to

More information

Procedures For Complaints of Unlawful Discrimination, Including Sexual Harassment

Procedures For Complaints of Unlawful Discrimination, Including Sexual Harassment Monterey Peninsula College Governing Board Policies Administrative Procedure 3435 (previously Appendix 5105) Procedures For Complaints of Unlawful Discrimination, Including Sexual Harassment Filed Under

More information

Margaret Tourtellotte v. Eli Lilly & Co

Margaret Tourtellotte v. Eli Lilly & Co 2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-13-2016 Margaret Tourtellotte v. Eli Lilly & Co Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016

More information

Price Waterhouse, Wright Line, and Proving a "Mixed Motive" Case under Title VII

Price Waterhouse, Wright Line, and Proving a Mixed Motive Case under Title VII Nebraska Law Review Volume 69 Issue 4 Article 5 1990 Price Waterhouse, Wright Line, and Proving a "Mixed Motive" Case under Title VII Kelly Robert Dahl University of Nebraska College of Law Follow this

More information