.Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
|
|
- Mavis Shaw
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASPEN PUBLISHERS CASES AND MATERIALS ON EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION Seventh Edition MICHAEL J. ZIMMER Professor of Law Seton Hall University CHARLES A. SULLIVAN Professor of Law Seton Hall University REBECCA HANNER WHITE Dean and J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law University of Georgia.Wolters Kluwer Law & Business AUSTIN BOSTON CHICAGO NEW YORK THE NETHERLANDS
2 CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgments Note to Students xxi xxv xxvii Chapter 1 Individual Disparate Treatment Discrimination A. Introduction B. The Elements of an Individual Disparate Treatment Case 1. Intent to Discriminate Slack v. Havens Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 2. Terms, Conditions, or Privileges of Employment Hishon v. King 6 1 Spalding Minor v. Centocor, Inc. 3. Linking Discriminatory Intent to the Employer's Treatment of Plaintiff Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa C. Proving the Discrimination Element Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins Note on the Intent of Multiple Decision-Makers McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green Patterson v. McLean Credit Union Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. Note on "Reverse" Discrimination Note on Preferences for Older Workers Note Comparing Section 1981 and Title VII Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc XI
3 xii Contents D. Implementing Desert Palace and Reeves 95 Rachid v. Jack in the Box, Inc Note on Special Issues of Proof 107 Note on Litigation Scorecard 110 Problem Note on International and Comparative Antidiscrimination Law 111 Chapter 2 Systemic Disparate Treatment Discrimination 115 A. Introduction 115 B. Formal Policies of Discrimination 116 Los Angeles Department of Water 6- Power v. Manhart C. Patterns and Practices of Discrimination 123 Teamsters v. United States Hazelwood School District v. United States Note on Sophisticated Statistical Techniques 141 D. Defenses to Disparate Treatment Cases Rebutting the Inference of Discriminatory Intent 155 Personnel Administrator v. Feeney EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck 6 Co Note on the New Stucturalism 166 Note on Nature Versus Nature 168 Problem Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications 171 International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc Voluntary Affirmative Action 183 Johnson v. Transportation Agency of Santa Clara County "Affirmative Action" Under the ADEA 200 Note on Affirmative Action and the Constitution 201 Note on International and Comparative Antidiscrimination Law 205 Chapter 3 Systemic Disparate Impact Discrimination 207 A. The Concept of Disparate Impact Discrimination 207 Griggs v. Duke Power Co
4 Contents Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio Smith v. City of Jackson B. The Structure of Disparate Impact Law After the 1991 Civil Rights Act 1. Plaintiffs Proof of a Prima Facie Case a. A Particular Employment Practice Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust Connecticut v. Teal Problem 3.1 b. The Employer Uses the Practice Dothard v. Rawlinson Problem 3.2 c. The Quantum of Impact 2. Defendant's Options a. Rebuttal: The Employer's Use Does Not Cause Impact b. Business Necessity and Job Relatedness El v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Problem Alternative Employment Practices Adams v. City of Chicago C. Section 703(h) Exceptions 1. Professionally Developed Tests Albemarle Paper Co. v. Mood)' Bryant v. City of Chicago 2. Bona Fide Seniority Systems Lester C. Thurow, The Zero Sum Society 3. Bona Fide Merit and Piecework Svstems Note on Litigation Scorecard Note on International and Comparative Antidiscrimination Law Chapter 4 The Interrelation of the Three Theories of Discrimination Problem 4.1 A. The Interrelationship of Individual and Systemic Disparate Treatment Baylie v. FRB
5 xiv Contents Note on the Relation Between Individual Cases and Unsuccessful Class Actions 299 B. The Relationship Between Individual Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact 299 C. The Relationship Between Systemic Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact Disparate Impact Analysis Inapplicable to Systemic Disparate Treatment Cases Intent to Discriminate: The Dividing Line Between the Two Systemic Theories Applying the Two Systemic Theories in One Case 302 EEOC v. Dial Corporation The Relationship of the Systemic Theories 310 a. When Can the Theories Be Deployed? 310 b. Out of the Disparate Treatment Pan into the Disparate Impact Fire? 311 D. Reconciling the Tension Between Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact 314 Problem Chapter 5 Special Problems in Applying Title VII, Section 1981, andtheadea 317 A. Introduction 317 B. Coverage of Title VII, Section 1981, and the ADEA 317 herohl v. Friends of Minnesota Sinfonia Note on Coverage of J Note on Constitutional Limitations on the Reach of the Antidiscrimination Laws 330 C. Sex Discrimination Discrimination "Because of Sex" 332 Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc a. Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation 337 Vickers v. Fairfield Medical Center b. "Reverse Discrimination" and "Personal Relationships" 346 c. Grooming and Dress Codes 347 Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc d. Discrimination Because of Pregnancy 353 Maldonado v. U.S. Bank and Manufacturers Bank California Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Guerra
6 Contents xv Note on Accommodating Pregnancy Under the Americans with Disabilities Act 368 Note on Childrearing Leave 368 Note on the Family and Medical Leave Act 369 Problem Sexual and Other Discriminatory Harassment 370 Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson Note on Other Discriminatory Harassment 375 a. Severe or Pervasive Harassment 376 Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc b. The "Reasonable Person" Requirement 382 c. "Unwelcome" Conduct 383 d. Vicarious Liability 384 Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders Matvia v. Bald Head Island Management, Inc Note on Employer Liability for Harassment by Co-Workers and Customers 413 Note on the First Amendment Implications of Sexual Harassment Liability 415 Note on Alternative Remedies for Harassment 417 D. Discrimination on Account of Religion 418 Reed v. Great Lakes Cos The Duty of Reasonable Accommodation 425 Wilson v. U.S. West Communications Note on Religious Institutions' Exemption from the Prohibition of Religious Discrimination 435 Note on BFOQ Defense to Religious Discrimination 436 Note on the Establishment Clause 437 Note on the Free Exercise Clause 438 E. National Origin and Alienage Discrimination 442 Zamora v. Elite Logistics, Inc Note on Language and National Origin Discrimination 454 Note on Trait Discrimination 456 Note on Section 1981's Application to National Origin and Alienage Discrimination 458 Limiting the Rights of Unauthorized Aliens 458 F. Union Liability 459 G. Retaliation 461 Clark County School District v. Breeden
7 xvi Contents 1. Protected Conduct Laughlin v. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 2. Adverse Action Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White H. Age Discrimination 1. Bona Fide Executive Exception 2. Exception for Police and Firefighters 3. Bona Fide Employee Benefit Plans 4. Early Retirement Incentive Plans Note on International and Comparative Antidiscrimination Law Chapter 6 Disability Discrimination A. Introduction B. The Meaning of "Disability" 1. Actual Disability Bragdon v. Abbott Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. Note on Deference to the EEOC Problem 6.1 Problem Record of Such an Impairment Problem Regarded as Having Such an Impairment Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. EEOC v. Schneider Nat'l, Inc. C. The Meaning of "Qualified Individual with a Disability" 1. Essential Job Functions Rehrs v. The lams Company Problem 6.4 Problem The Duty of Reasonable Accommodation US Airways, Inc. v. Bamett Huber v. Wal-Mart
8 Contents xvii Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration Gambini v. Total Renal Care, Inc Note on Accommodations Necessary to Enjoy Benefits and Privileges of Employment 561 Note on Knowing That Accommodation Is Needed Undue Hardship 563 Note on Burdens of Production and Proof 565 D. Discriminatory Qualification Standards Direct Threat 567 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal Problem Job-Related and Consistent with Business Necessity 576 Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg Disparate Impact 581 E. Special Problems of Disability Discrimination Drug or Alcohol Users Medical Examinations and Inquiries 583 a. Pre-Employment Medical Examinations and Inquiries 583 b. Medical Examinations and Inquiries of Current Employees Retaliation and Interference Harassment Protected Relationships Health and Disability Insurance 587 EEOC Interim Guidance on Application of ADA to Health Insurance Familv and Medical Leave Act 591 Chapter 7 Procedures for Enforcing Antidiscrimination Laws 595 A. Introduction 595 B. The Administrative Phase: Charge Filing Introduction Filing a Timely Charge 597 Ledbetter v. The Goodyear Tire (5 Rubber Co., Inc Note on Timeliness in Pattern and Practice Cases 617 Note on Waiver, Tolling, and Estoppel 618 C. Filing Suit 620 Problem D. Relationship of the EEOC Charge to Private Suit Proper Plaintiffs Proper Defendants 624
9 xviii Contents 3. Scope of the Suit 624 Note on Avoiding the Title VII Procedural Maze Via J E. The Interrelationship of Various Rights and Remedies 626 F. Class Actions Introduction Requirements of Rule 23(a) 629 Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc Requirements of Rule 23(b) Settling Class Actions 645 G. Federal Government Enforcement 646 H. Suit Against Governmental Employers State and Local Government Employment 648 a. Tenth and Eleventh Amendment Challenges 648 b. Exemptions Federal Employment 651 Chapter 8 Judicial Relief 653 A. Introduction 653 Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody B. Equitable Relief to the Victims of Discrimination Reinstatement, Retroactive Seniority, and Injunctive Relief 658 Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co Who Gets Retroactive Seniority and Backpay? 664 Teamsters v. United States Limits on Backpay 670 a. The Backpay Period 671 Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co b. The Duty to Mitigate Damages Front Pay 680 Cassino v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc C. Legal Remedies to the Victims of Discrimination Compensatory Damages 685 Turic v. Holland Hospitality, Inc Pollard v. E. 1. du Pont de Nemours 6 Co Punitive Damages 690 Kolstad v. American Dental Association 690
10 Contents xix D. Note on Operation of the Statutory Caps Note on Personal Liability of Employees 3. Liquidated Damages Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins Attorneys' Fees Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC Buckhannon Board 6- Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department of Health (5 Human Resources Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany Note on Taxation, Insurance, and Bankruptcy A. B. Chapter 9 Managing Risks in Employment Discrimination Disputes Introduction Settlements and Releases Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. Arbitrating Discrimination Claims Gilmer v. Interstate /Johnson Lane Corp. Note on the Policy Implications of Arbitration Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams Note on the Elephant in the Room: Allocating the Costs of Arbitration Note on Enforcing the Arbitral Award Problem 9.1 Note on International and Comparative Antidiscrimination Law A. B. C. Chapter 10 The Policy Bases for Antidiscrimination Law Introduction Discrimination and the Free Market Jacob E. Gersen, Markets and Discrimination Whv Prohibit Discrimination? Patricia I. Williams. The Alchemv of Race and Rights
11 xx Contents D. The Costs and Benefits of Prohibiting Discrimination Weighing Economic Costs and Benefits Weighing Noneconomic Costs and Benefits 785 Table of Cases 789 Table of Selected Secondary Authorities 809 Index 823
CONTENTS PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. Chapter 1: Employment Discrimination 3. Chapter 2: Administrative Process 13
CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgements Practice and Procedural Tips A Note About the Cases Included and Case Editing xix xxiii xxi xxxiii PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS Chapter 1: Employment
More informationIndividual Disparate Treatment
Individual Disparate Treatment Hishon v. King & Spalding (U.S. 1984) Title VII prohibits discrimination in compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment A benefit that is part and parcel
More informationEMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION NUMBER: 02
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND LABOR RELATIONS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR STUDIES & EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION
More informationDETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication... Preface... Acknowledgments... Summary Table of Contents... v vii xi xiii Chapter 1. The Evolution of Whistleblower Protections... 1-1 I. Historical Background...
More informationI. Failure to State a Claim
IDENTIFYING A V AILABLE DEFENSES! ARNOLD W. "TRIP" UMBACH III STARNES DAVIS FLORIE LLP 100 BROOKWOOD PLACE, SEVENTH FLOOR BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35209 tumbach@starneslaw.com (205) 868-6000 WEBSITE: WWW.STARNESLAW.COM
More informationIn the Supreme Court of The United States
No. 08-441 In the Supreme Court of The United States JACK GROSS, Petitioner, v. FBL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
More informationB. The 1991 Civil Rights Act and the Conflict between the Circuits
Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Law By Louis Malone O Donoghue & O Donoghue A. Introduction Historically, federal courts have allowed the recovery of money damages resulting from civil rights
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE I. AGE DISCRIMINATION By Edward T. Ellis 1 A. Disparate Impact Claims Under the ADEA After Smith v. City of Jackson 1. The Supreme
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 560 U. S. (2010) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationCHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION...40
40 CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION...40 1. Professional Standards Applicable to Management s Employment Decisions...40
More informationThe Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant. Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.
The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Brief History Lesson At-will employment doctrine National Labor Relations
More informationSMU Law Review. Lindsey Watkins. Volume 58. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr. Recommended Citation
SMU Law Review Volume 58 2005 Employment Discrimination - Age Discrimination - The Fifth Circuit Holds a Plaintiff May Utilize the Mixed-Motives Method of Analysis in Age Discrimination Cases, Absent any
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationEPLI Claims in the 5 th Circuit
EPLI Claims in the 5 th Circuit Presented by Charles H. Wilson Vice Chair, Office Managing Partner Cozen O Connor, P.C. (713) 750-3117 Cwilson@cozen.com What are we going to cover today? Overview of applicable
More informationEMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: 2001 TERM
EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: 2001 TERM The United States Supreme Court addressed several critical issues of employment law during its 2001 term. 1 This Article reviews those decisions. I. PROCEEDINGS
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEE PRESENTS: EEO LAW BASICS SPRING 2006 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE EEO BASICS MATERIALS... 1
More informationSmith v. City of Jackson: Does It Really Open New Opportunities for ADEA Plaintiffs to Recover Under a Disparate Impact Theory?
Smith v. City of Jackson: Does It Really Open New Opportunities for ADEA Plaintiffs to Recover Under a Disparate Impact Theory? DONALD J. SPERO * I. INTRODUCTION... 184 II. THE ORIGIN OF DISPARATE IMPACT...
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO MINIATURE LAMP WORKS, Defendant-Appellant
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO MINIATURE LAMP WORKS, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT 947 F.2d
More informationDETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedications...v Board of Editors... vii v Foreword...xxxv xxix Preface... xxxvii xxxi Summary Table of Contents... xli xxxiii Chapter 1. An Overview... 1-1 1-1 Part I: Theories
More informationKRUPIN O'BRIEN LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1156 FIFTEENTH STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C
KRUPIN O'BRIEN LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1156 FIFTEENTH STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 TELEPHONE (202) 530-0700 FACSIMILE (202) 530-0703 American Bar Association Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 532 U. S. (2001) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationMaryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101
Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101 Presenter: Glendora C. Hughes General Counsel Maryland Commission on Civil Rights 5/12/2015 1 Discrimination Protections Maryland
More informationThe Civil Rights Act of 1991
The Civil Rights Act of 1991 EDITOR'S NOTE: The text of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166), as enacted on November 21, 1991, appears below with the following modifications: 1. The text of the
More informationCLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit
268 OCTOBER TERM, 2000 Syllabus CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 00 866. Decided April 23, 2001
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:107
Case: 1:12-cv-09795 Document #: 24 Filed: 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:107 JACQUELINE B. BLICKLE v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff,
More informationNAACP v. Town of Harrison: Applying Title VII Disparate Impact Analysis to Municipal Residency Requirements
Volume 37 Issue 2 Article 5 1992 NAACP v. Town of Harrison: Applying Title VII Disparate Impact Analysis to Municipal Residency Requirements James C. King Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-LENARD/GOODMAN
Case 1:15-cv-20561-JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2015 Page 1 of 16 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN
More informationWHAT IS MY CASE WORTH
ABA SECTION OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW S ANNUAL MEETING August 8, 2005 WHAT IS MY CASE WORTH Melinda J. Caterine Moon, Moss & Shapiro, P.A. Ten Free Street P.O. Box 7250 Portland, ME 04112-7250 (207)
More informationIntersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts
Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts Presented By: Keji A. Ayorinde, Assistant General Counsel, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
More informationThe Civil Rights Act of 1991
Page 1 of 18 The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission The Civil Rights Act of 1991 EDITOR'S NOTE: The text of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166), as enacted on November 21, 1991, appears
More informationThe Meacham and Gulino Rulings: Remnants of the Wards Cove Era
The Meacham and Gulino Rulings: Remnants of the Wards Cove Era Art Gutman Florida Institute of Technology Eric Dunleavy DCI Consulting In August 2006 the 2nd Circuit ruled in two cases that have implications
More informationClaiming Employment Discrimination in New Mexico under State and Federal Law
21 N.M. L. Rev. 415 (Spring 1991 1991) Spring 1991 Claiming Employment Discrimination in New Mexico under State and Federal Law David L. Ceballes Recommended Citation David L. Ceballes, Claiming Employment
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States CITY OF CHICAGO,
No. 08-974 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ARTHUR L. LEWIS, JR., et al., v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Petitioners, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh
More informationLawyers for employees breathed a
F O C U S MANAGED CARE LIABILITY Desert Palace v. Costa and Hill v. Lockheed Martin: One Step Forward, One Step Back by Ann Groninger Ann Groninger practices civil litigation and criminal defense with
More informationNova Law Review. The Use of Pattern-and-Practice by Individuals in Non-class Claims. David J. Bross. Volume 28, Issue Article 14
Nova Law Review Volume 28, Issue 3 2004 Article 14 The Use of Pattern-and-Practice by Individuals in Non-class Claims David J. Bross Copyright c 2004 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The
More informationQuestion and Instruction on Retaliation under Texas Whistleblower Act
PJC 107.4 Question and Instruction on Retaliation under Texas Whistleblower Act QUESTION Was Paul Payne s report [insert matter reported] made in good faith and a cause of Don Davis s [terminating, suspending,
More information2007 EMPLOYMENT LAW SYMPOSIUM July 20, 2007 Dallas, Texas
RETALIATION CLAIMS AFTER BURLINGTON NORTHERN V. WHITE MARLOW J. MULDOON II Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202 214-712-9500 214-712-9540 (fax) marlow.muldoon@cooperscully.com
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 534 U. S. (2002) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 99 1823 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, PETITIONER v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
More informationPublic Personnel Law U.S. SUPREME COURT ISSUES ADA AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT DECISIONS. The ADA Case. Stephen Allred
Public Personnel Law Number 17 July 1998 Stephen Allred, Editor U.S. SUPREME COURT ISSUES ADA AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT DECISIONS Stephen Allred The United States Supreme Court issued three decisions at the
More informationGUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606
GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606 Section 1606.1 Definition of national origin discrimination. 1606.2 Scope of Title VII protection. 1606.3 The national security exception.
More informationDEPENDS. year! unlawful procedures in the workplace. in the workplace.
WHAT IS IS AN AN ADVERSE ADVERSE ACTION? ACTION? WELL, IT WELL, IT DEPENDS By: Michelle J. Douglass, J. Douglass, Esquire Esquire The Law Office Office of Michelle of Michelle J Douglass, J Douglass, L.L.C.
More informationCHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION
CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION First, we describe the projected future diverse workforce. Then we describe diversity and diversity
More informationAmendments The Clean Up. Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments Civil Rights. Amendments Civil Rights
Amendments 11-12 The Clean Up Amendment XI - State Citizenship Date Ratified - Feb. 7, 1795 Date Passed by Congress - Mar. 4, 1794 What it does - Prohibits a citizen of another state or country from suing
More informationJody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division
Order Code RS22686 June 28, 2007 Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act: A Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court s Decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. Summary
More informationRestituto Estacio v. Postmaster General
2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-28-2009 Restituto Estacio v. Postmaster General Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-1626
More informationNo IN THE 6XSUHPH&RXUWRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV. U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INCORPORATED, Respondent.
No. 99-1823 IN THE 6XSUHPH&RXUWRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INCORPORATED, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of
More informationArbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees: The Sixth Circuit Says the EEOC Is Not Bound - EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & (and) Crafts, Inc.
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2000 Issue 1 Article 17 2000 Arbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees: The Sixth Circuit Says the EEOC Is Not Bound - EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & (and)
More information2015 Employment Law Practice Tips
2015 Employment Law Practice Tips November 2015 Shelley I. Ericsson Sources of Rules Laws/Regulations Policies Agreements Guidelines Employment-At-Will Working arrangements not governed by collective bargaining
More information2015 Employment Law Practice Tips
2015 Employment Law Practice Tips November 2015 Shelley I. Ericsson Sources of Rules Laws/Regulations Policies Agreements Guidelines Employment At Will Working arrangements not governed by collective bargaining
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv VMC-TBM.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] NEELAM UPPAL, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-13614 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-00634-VMC-TBM FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH
More informationA Live 90-Minute Audio Conference with Interactive Q&A
presents Ricci v. DeStefano: Balancing Title VII Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact Leveraging the Supreme Court's Guidance on Employment Testing and its Impact on Voluntary Compliance Actions A
More informationMARALYN S. JAMES, Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Respondent. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
MARALYN S. JAMES, Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 539 U. S. (2003) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationThe Tort Label. Florida Law Review. Sandra F. Sperino. Volume 66 Issue 3 Article 3. February 2015
Florida Law Review Volume 66 Issue 3 Article 3 February 2015 The Tort Label Sandra F. Sperino Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
CASE 0:15-cv-01491-MJD-SER Document 5 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Disability Support Alliance, on behalf of its members; and Zach Hillesheim, Civil File
More informationFACULTY MASTER AGREEMENT
FACULTY MASTER AGREEMENT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #882 AND EDUCATION MINNESOTA - MONTICELLO Effective Dates: July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017 MONTICELLO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACULTY MASTER CONTRACT TABLE
More informationWalton v. Mental Health Assn
1999 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-23-1999 Walton v. Mental Health Assn Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 97-2000 Follow this and additional works
More informationInvestigating EEO complaints. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Investigating EEO complaints Description: This is a course for EEO investigators (i.e., those who investigate the formal complaint and prepare a Report of Investigation (ROI). The topics covered include
More informationStatutory Basis 1/28/2009. Chapter 6. National Origin Discrimination
Chapter 6 National Origin Discrimination Employment Law for BUSINESS sixth edition Dawn D. BENNETT-ALEXANDER and Laura P. HARTMAN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 98 208 CAROLE KOLSTAD, PETITIONER v. AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationFOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case
DOCKET # cv (2-3 letter city code) EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION PROJECT CODING FORM 1. Case name: 2. a) Judicial division and district: NDIL NDCA EDPA SDNY NDTX NDGA EDLA b) Case location: Federal Records
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv MSS-GJK.
SHARON BENTLEY, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-11617 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv-01102-MSS-GJK [DO NOT PUBLISH] FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL34691 The ADA Amendments Act: P.L. 110-325 Nancy Lee Jones, American Law Division September 29, 2008 Abstract. The Americans
More informationSex Discrimination Topics: Employment and Education. I. Sex Discrimination in Employment: Developments in the Law
Copyright 1992 by the National Clearinghouse for Legal Services. All Rights Reserved. 25 Clearinghouse Review 391 (Special Issue 1991) Sex Discrimination Topics: Employment and Education by Ellen Vargyas,
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1331 CARLA CALOBRISI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., Defendant - Appellee. ------------------------ AARP,
More informationJames J. Oh. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 321 North Clark Street Suite 1000 Chicago, IL 60654 main: (312) 372-5520 direct: (312) 795-3261 fax: (312) 372-7880 joh@littler.com Focus Areas Class Actions Wage and Hour Discrimination and
More informationALI-ABA S CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW. July 28-30, Santa Fe, New Mexico
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1227 25TH STREET, NW, SUITE 700 WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1175 202.861.0900 FAX: 202.296.2882 EBGLAW.COM FRANK C. MORRIS, JR. TEL: 202.861.1880 FAX: 202.296.2882 FMORRIS@EBGLAW.COM MINH N.
More informationArbitration Law of Canada: Practice and Procedure
Arbitration Law of Canada: Practice and Procedure Third Edition J. Brian Casey JURIS Questions About This Publication For assistance with shipments, billing or other customer service matters, please call
More informationStaub Anderson Green LLC LLC FORMATION CHECKLIST
Staub Anderson Green LLC LLC FORMATION CHECKLIST SUBMITTING ATTORNEY: CLIENT, SUBFILE & MATTER NUMBER: CLIENT, SUBFILE & MATTER NAME: FORMATION DEADLINE: DATE SUBMITTED: Note: The submitting attorney must
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES E. ZEIGLER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 06-1385 (RMC JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationCURRENT PAGES OF THE LAWS & RULES OF THE MOBILE COUNTY PERSONNEL BOARD
CURRENT PAGES OF THE LAWS & RULES OF THE MOBILE COUNTY PERSONNEL BOARD : I II III IV V ACT SECTION: 1 14 2 15 3 16 4 17 5 18 6 19 7 20 8 21 9 22 10 23 11 24 12 25 13 RULES SECTION: RULE I Page 1 7 RULE
More informationRaymond MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, USBI COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 1, 1999.
Raymond MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. USBI COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 98-6690. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 1, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Plaintiff, DUNBAR DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Unhed 3tatal
More informationThe legality of affirmative action plans and consent decrees in the light of recent court decisions
The legality of affirmative action plans and consent decrees in the light of recent court decisions Author: David P. Twomey Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1486 This work is posted on escholarship@bc,
More information2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.
Slip Copy Page 1 E.E.O.C. v. InternationalProfit Associates, Inc. N.D.Ill.,2007. Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court,N.D. Illinois,Eastern Division. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
More informationPOLLARD V. E.I. DUPONT: A REEXAMINATION OF DISPARATE TREATMENT REMEDIES ROBERT K. ROBINSON * ROSS L. FINK ** NEAL P. MERO *** I.
POLLARD V. E.I. DUPONT: A REEXAMINATION OF DISPARATE TREATMENT REMEDIES ROBERT K. ROBINSON * ROSS L. FINK ** NEAL P. MERO *** I. INTRODUCTION On June 4, 2001, the Supreme Court of the United States in
More informationCat s in the Cradle: Tenth Circuit Provides Silver Spoon of Subordinate Bias Liability in EEOC v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Oklahoma Law Review Volume 61 Number 3 2008 Cat s in the Cradle: Tenth Circuit Provides Silver Spoon of Subordinate Bias Liability in EEOC v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles Curtis J. Thomas
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Derek Hall appeals the district court s grant of summary judgment to
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit September 15, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT DEREK HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERSTATE
More informationConference on Criminal Records and Employment
Conference on Criminal Records and Employment Title VII, Adverse Impact, and Criminal Records as a Selection Device, Matrix Approaches, and the Uniform Selection Guidelines David Lopez General Counsel,
More informationThe Business Necessity Defense in Disparate Impact Discrimination Cases
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 1996 The Business Necessity Defense in Disparate Impact Discrimination Cases
More informationCase Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators
Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Jay E. Grenig Rocco M. Scanza Cornell University, ILR School Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution JURIS Questions
More informationWithin the Grasp of the Cat's Paw: Delineating the Scope of Subordinate Bias Liability Under Federal Anti-Discrimination Statutes
Scholarship Repository University of Minnesota Law School Articles Faculty Scholarship 2008 Within the Grasp of the Cat's Paw: Delineating the Scope of Subordinate Bias Liability Under Federal Anti-Discrimination
More informationSconfienza v. Verizon PA Inc
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-5-2008 Sconfienza v. Verizon PA Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-2498 Follow this
More informationDrew M. Capuder CAPUDER FANTASIA PLLC
Manchin Professional Building 1543 Fairmont Avenue, Suite 207 Fairmont, West Virginia 26554 Voice: 304-333-5261 Fax: 304-367-1868 Email: dcapuder@capuderfantasia.com Web: www.capuderfantasia.com Hot Topics:
More informationYou means the associate signing this document and any other person who asserts that associate s rights.
RAYMOUR & FLANIGAN EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION PROGRAM TERMS This Program is a contract between Raymour & Flanigan and you governing how employment-related disputes are to be resolved. It is an essential, required
More informationWESA AND THE MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. Minnesota Department of Human Rights
WESA AND THE MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT Minnesota Department of Human Rights 5/7/2015 MDHR 2 Background Governor Mark Dayton signed WESA into law on May 11, 2014. WESA amended certain aspects of Minn.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Tompkins v. Rite Aid Doc. 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION Larry Tompkins, ) Civil Action No. 8:09-02369-JMC ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) )
More informationNOTES TITLE VII AND COMPETITIVE TESTING
NOTES TITLE VII AND COMPETITIVE TESTING As of 1984, federal, state, and local government employees numbered over sixteen million, with a combined payroll of nearly twenty-seven billion dollars. 1 This
More informationFederal Civil Rights Statutes: A Primer
Order Code RL33386 Federal Civil Rights Statutes: A Primer Updated October 24, 2008 Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division Federal Civil Rights Statutes: A Primer Summary Under federal law,
More informationElizabeth Grossman Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York April 23, 2012
Elizabeth Grossman Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York April 23, 2012 Drafting Statement of Claim Identify the specific alleged adverse action If not obvious, indicate how
More informationAvoiding and Handling Retaliation Claims
Avoiding and Handling Retaliation Claims Presented By: Jonathan Hancock, Esq. 165 Madison Avenue Suite 2000 Memphis, Tennessee Email: jhancock@bakerdonelson.com Phone: 901.577.8202 2010 Baker, Donelson,
More informationCase 8:05-cv GLS-DRH Document 31 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 21
Case 8:05-cv-00506-GLS-DRH Document 31 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAREN TENNEY, Plaintiff, v. 1:05-CV-0506 (GLS\DRH) ESSEX COUNTY/ HORACE NYE
More informationSexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination in Employment: A Legal Analysis of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination in Employment: A Legal Analysis of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) Jody Feder Legislative Attorney Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney
More informationFILED 16 DEC 19 AM 11:25
FILED DEC AM : 1 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --0- SEA 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION, SEATTLE HOTEL ASSOCIATION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : 1:14-CV-1474 Plaintiff : : v. : : COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, and the : PENNSYLVANIA STATE
More informationSeptember 2015 Office of Legal Counsel
September 2015 Office of Legal Counsel 1 Overview of the EEOC Enforcement Data Title VII Recent Cases Religious Accommodation Protection for LGBT Workers Protecting immigrant, migrant, and other vulnerable
More informationTITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is the text of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) (Title VII), as amended, as it appears in volume 42 of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X JENNIFER WILCOX,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X JENNIFER WILCOX, : Plaintiff, : : -against- : 11 Civ. 8606 (HB) : CORNELL UNIVERSITY,
More informationUSDS SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: _ DATE FILED: f-~/1 't /1<{
Case 1:96-cv-08414-KMW Document 1008 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------X GULINO, ET AL., -against-
More informationDiscrimination v. Retaliation: What Level of Harm is Necessary to Establish a Cause of Action Under Title VII?
Chicago-Kent College of Law Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Louis Jackson National Student Writing Competition Institute for Law and the Workplace 1-1-2011 Discrimination v. Retaliation:
More information