Phoenix District EEOC Office Legal Update. Mary Jo O Neill, Regional Attorney, November
|
|
|
- Jeffrey Cannon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Phoenix District EEOC Office Legal Update Mary Jo O Neill, Regional Attorney, November
2 AGENDA: Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions. Court Victories by EEOC Phoenix District Office. Court Settlements by EEOC Phoenix District Office. Future Trends.
3 USSC Decisions: Staub v. Proctor Hospital, No (3/21/2011) (S. Ct.) (Cat s Paw theory - USERRA agency principles for liability when biased subordinate contributes to decision to terminate reserve officer). Facts: Supervisor made anti-military comments; reserve officer was terminated. Question: Can there be subordinate liability for discrimination? Holding: Employer can be liable under certain circumstances for the discriminatory animus of a supervisor who did not make ultimate decision.
4 USSC Decisions: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., No (S. Ct.) (3/22/11) (meaning of filed a complaint under FLSA). Facts: Employee fired in retaliation for complaining about location of time clocks. Question: What is the meaning of filed a complaint under FLSA for protection against retaliation? Holding: Oral or written complaints are filed. Therefore, retaliation protection applies.
5 USSC Decisions: Wal-Mart v. Dukes, No (S.Ct.) (June 20, 2011) FACTS: Class of women was certified under Rule 23, Fed.R.Civ.P, in San Francisco; 9 th Circuit affirmed. Question: Could the class of 1.5 million female employees pursue a class action under Rule 23(b)(2)? HELD: By 5/4, Court said No. Note: EEOC does not have to comply with Rule 23.
6 USSC Decisions: Thompson v. North American Stainless, L.P., decided 8-0 on January 24, 2011 Facts: Miriam Regalado filed an EEOC charge against NAS; three weeks later NAS fired her fiancée, Eric Thompson Question: Does the finance have a retaliation claim? Held: Yes. A person aggrieved includes those in the zone of interest.
7 Recent EEOC Court Victories: EEOC v Go Daddy EEOC won jury trial on retaliation claim on behalf of Muslim Moroccan man; we won case again on appeal in 9 th Circuit in retaliation case. Charging Party just got paid $287,000 (included $45,000 in interest).
8 Recent EEOC Court Victories: EEOC v Peabody Coal -won in 9 th Circuit. Back for joinder and discovery on tribal preference issue and injunctive relief. Petition for cert denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.
9 Recent EEOC Court Victories: EEOC v Cannon & Wendt EEOC won contempt hearing on payment of CP for $100, 000 without additional I-9 and selection of trainer. EEOC v Autozone EEOC won jury trial on sexual harassment for $65,000. Autozone appealed to Ninth Circuit. We won again on appeal in 9 th Circuit.
10 Recent EEOC Court Victories: EEOC v. Subway -EEOC won summary judgment on liability in pregnancy termination/ failure to hire case with direct evidence. Trial will be soon on damages in Phoenix federal district court.
11 Recent EEOC Court Victories: EEOC v Federal Express -9 th Circuit held that we can obtain nation-wide information in a subpoena enforcement. EEOC v Patterson -Colorado District Court held that we can obtain nation-wide information in a subpoena enforcement.
12 Since October 1, 2009 to present Resolutions in Courts by the EEOC Phoenix District Office Legal Unit: over $39,000,000 in real money plus jobs, injunctions, notice posting, training, references, file expungements, discipline, policy changes, new policies, apologies..
13 Recent Phoenix District EEOC RESOLUTIONS IN COURT: All Consent Decrees are in the public eye, with press releases, with training, policy changes, injunctions, notice postings, reporting, monitoring, monetary relief and other appropriate relief... NO CONFIDENTIALITY!!!!!!!!
14 Our Goals in Litigation: Get victims of discrimination maximum relief to make them whole, as if the discrimination had not occurred. Institute whatever changes to ensure that the discrimination never reoccurs ( injunction, training, discipline, job offers, policy changes, discipline of ADO s, ).
15 CASES RESOLVED: Outback (Colo.)-gender/ failure to promotenationwide systemic case; very strong Consent Decree, start Human Resources department, start job postings, start application processes, hire external monitor. $19, 000, 000 ($19 million) for class of female victims. LESSONS: 1) review EEO-1 data; 2) check to see if promotion numbers make sense compared to employee data; 3) check to see if subjective decision making about promotions; 4) have job postings; 5)have applications; 6) have HR department.
16 Albertsons (Colo.)-systemic race and national origin harassment and retaliation case (class-165); $8,900,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t let racial or national origin harassment happen or be tolerated. Stop it with serious discipline of offenders. Don t let retaliation occur.
17 Corrections Corporation of America/ Dominion (Colo.)-systemic severe, egregious sexual harassment/ retaliation case (class of 22)- $1,300,000 and strong Consent Decree. Lesson: Punish sexual harassment and retaliation immediately if it occurs.
18 The Connection (N.M.)-sexual harassment (class); $187,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t let sexual harassment go unpunished. Conoco Phillips 66 (N.M.)-sex/ pregnancy/ involuntary leave and discharge (class of 2) $40,500 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Train on pregnancy discrimination and don t do it.
19 Old Castle (Colo.)- gender/ female harassment/ retaliation (class-3); $498,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t allow gender stereotyping. Don t allow retaliation against witnesses or complainants.
20 Ralph Schomp (Colo.)-sexual harassment/ age discharge; $1,505,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: New managers and supervisors require training. Don t let age based stereotyping to occur or be acted upon. Stop sexual harassment!
21 RESOLUTIONS IN COURT Bellco (Colo.)-ADEA discharge-$57,250. and training. LESSON: Look to see if older worker is being treated more harshly. ADECCO (Utah)-retaliation against witness in a sexual harassment case; $62,500 and a strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t let retaliation occur to witnesses. Stock Building (N.M.) female/termination; $30,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Challenge gender stereotyping.
22 Tim Dahle Nissan of Sandy (UT.)-sexual harassment/ retaliation (class-5)- $455,000 and strong Consent Decree including apologies. Cheesecake Factory (Az.)-same sex sexual harassment/ discharge (class)- $345,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSONS: Don t tolerate same sex sexual harassment as horseplay. Punish it and stop it. Don t allow retaliation.
23 Bell Road Auto Mall (Az.)-sexual and race harassment/ discharge/ retaliation (class-5)- $500,000 and strong Consent Decree including apologies. LESSONS: Have zero tolerance for race, national origin and sex harassment. STOP IT. Take decisive action.
24 Kalil (Az.)-ADA (diabetes)/discharge- $33,000 and strong Consent Decree, including policy change. (use of DOT medical standard for non-dot drivers). Lesson: Don t use medical/ physical criteria as obstacles to employment unless really required.
25 Realty Management (Az.)- ADA (psychiatric)/ failure to accommodate (leave)/ discharge- $30,000 and strong Consent Decree. Lesson: Refusal to grant leaves is an ADA problem unless undue hardship.
26 Cannon & Wendt (Az.)-national origin harassment (Mexican)/ retaliation; $100,000 and strong Consent Decree (apology). Lesson: Stop racist harassment against Latinos.
27 Flemings (Az.)-same sex sexual harassment (class) and retaliation; $ 248,750 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Take same sex sexual harassment seriously; it s not horseplay. Boeing (Az.)-gender and sexual harassment/ retaliation (class-3); $380,000 and strong Consent Decree. Lesson: Stop gender harassment; punish the harassers.
28 Loves Travel (Az.)-sexual harassment (class-2) and retaliation; $ 70,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Punish sexual harassers. Red Rock Jeep (Az.)-ADEA/ discharge of 75 year old; $35,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t allow stereotyping about older workers.
29 Creative Networks (Az.)-retaliation for filing charge and being listed (class-2); $110,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t retaliate against employees for filing charges. Ranch Market (N.M.)-ADA (learning disabilities) failure to hire and failure to accommodate -$30,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Don t let myths, fears and stereotypes about disabilities to affect decision making.
30 Temple Inland (Az.)-ADEA/ layoff; $250,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Be careful about age discrimination in layoffs. Oaktree (Az.)-religious harassment/ failure to accommodate religion (class)-$75,000 and strong Consent Decree. Lesson: Supervisors cannot impose their religion upon their employees.
31 Brown Palace (Colo.)- $146,000 and Decree for failure to promote single mom. LESSON: Don t assume a Mother or single Mother cannot do a job which requires long hours and/or traveling. Avoid gender based stereotyping. PBC (Colo.)- pregnancy/ discharge; $20,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Be wary of pregnancy bias.
32 Siouxland (S.D.)- pregnancy/ discharge/ failure to hire (class); $118,000 and strong Consent Decree after winning jury trial and a successful appeal to 8 th Circut on Judge s refusal to give punitive damages instruction. Mountain Towers Healthcare (Wy.)- Pregnancy/ discharge; $10,000, neutral letter of reference, and strong Consent Decree. LESSONS: Train on pregnancy discrimination and don t allow it to happen. Debunk myths, fears and stereotypes about pregnant employees.
33 Sonic Drive In (N.M.)- sexual harassment by a manager, class of 79 included teenagers and parolees; Obtained $2,000,000 and strong Consent Decree. Lesson: 1) Stop sexual harassment. 2) Fire sexual harassers. 3) When employer has knowledge of sexual harassment, they have to act, investigate and STOP it.
34 Discount Cabinets (Colo.)- Failure to make reasonable accommodation for deaf employee, retaliation; $60,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Provide reasonable accommodations unless real undue hardship.
35 Greystar Properties (Az.)- Retaliation by unfavorable references; $3,250 and strong Consent Decree. Alamos Verdes Restaurante (Colo.)- Sexual harassment by two of the owners, Class of 12); $100,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Stop sexual harassment!
36 Spartan Plumbing (Az.)- Racial harassment (Black/African American) and retaliation; $10,000, apology, and strong Consent Decree. LESSON: Stop race harassment.
37 Anthem College Online (Az.)- Sexual harassment, class 6 women; $260,000, apology, and strong Consent Decree. Acclaim Charter School (Az.)- Sexual harassment, constructive discharge; $41,125, positive letter of reference, and strong Consent Decree. LESSONS: 1) discipline sexual harasser, and 2) stop it.
38 Genesco dba Journeys (N.M.)- Sexual harassment, retaliation for complaining about the harassment; $21, for three women, neutral letters of reference, and strong Consent Decree. Fisher Sand and Gravel (N.M.)-sexual harassment by a supervisory official; $150,000 and strong Consent Decree. LESSONS: Train all employees and supervisors on sexual harassment.
39 Arizona Delivery Logistics-(Az.)-class sexual harassment case settled for strong Consent Decree and $175,000; company can never rehire the ADO. LESSON: When company has knowledge of sexual harassment, take appropriate discipline against harasser, including termination. El Palacio-(Az.)-pregnancy refusal to hire case settled for $20,000 and Consent Decree.
40 RESOLUTIONS IN COURT: Maverik Country Stores-(Wyg.)-HIV termination case settled for strong Consent Decree and $115,000. LESSON: Employers need to deal with myths fears and stereotypes about HIV. TIC-(Colo.)-ADA case settled for $135,000 and changes in policies and training. LESSON: Don t have 100% return to work policies.
41 RESOLUTIONS IN COURT: Roberts Trucking-(N.M.)-class sexual harassment/ retaliation case settled for strong Consent Decree and $300,000. LESSON: Employers need to deal with sexual harassment and not retaliate. CPES-(AZ.)-ADA case refusal to hire hearing impaired applicants settled for $33,500+, a strong Consent Decree and changes in policies and training. LESSON: Don t have blanket exclusion policies.
42 RESOLUTIONS IN COURT: Terminix-(UT.)-class sexual harassment/ retaliation case settled for strong Consent Decree and $140,000. LESSON: Employers need to deal with sexual harassment and not retaliate.
43 Future Trends: More Systemic/ Policy cases Credit Check Issues Arrest/ Conviction Issues Immigrant Related Issues GINA Issues ADAAA Issues Employers refusing to hire the unemployed Leaves of Absences casessee Verizon ($20 million and Consent Decree), Sears, and Supervalu cases..
44 QUESTIONS???? THANK YOU!!!!!
EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program -0-00 EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al. Judge Mary H. Murguia Follow this and additional
The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant. Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.
The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Brief History Lesson At-will employment doctrine National Labor Relations
Prepare for the EEOC s Targeted Enforcement for February 27, 2013
Prepare for the EEOC s Targeted Enforcement for 2013-2016 February 27, 2013 Before we begin... Reminder that phone lines are muted Direct your questions to seminars@leclairryan.com with SEP question in
James J. Oh. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 321 North Clark Street Suite 1000 Chicago, IL 60654 main: (312) 372-5520 direct: (312) 795-3261 fax: (312) 372-7880 joh@littler.com Focus Areas Class Actions Wage and Hour Discrimination and
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE
2 6 10 1 1 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) Creative Networks, L.L.C., an Arizona ) L.L.C., ) Defendants.
EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program June 2011 EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc. Judge Mary H.
Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell
Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell (612) 604 6685 lpfeiffer@winthrop.com RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE TITLE VII
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 1-20-2004 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION Christine Park-Gonzalez, Deputy District Director EEOC Los Angeles District EEOC is an independent regulatory commission
EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program Summer 8-29-2014 EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds Judge Martha Vasquez Follow this and additional
Investigating EEO complaints. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Investigating EEO complaints Description: This is a course for EEO investigators (i.e., those who investigate the formal complaint and prepare a Report of Investigation (ROI). The topics covered include
September 2015 Office of Legal Counsel
September 2015 Office of Legal Counsel 1 Overview of the EEOC Enforcement Data Title VII Recent Cases Religious Accommodation Protection for LGBT Workers Protecting immigrant, migrant, and other vulnerable
JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE
JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE I. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Judiciary of Guam ( Judiciary ) is an equal employment opportunity employer. It is the policy
ALSB Journal of Employment and Labor Law Volume 15, 46 53, Spring 2014
ALSB Journal of Employment and Labor Law Volume 15, 46 53, Spring 2014 In Search of UnderStanding: An Analysis of Thompson v. North American Stainless, L.P., and The Expansion of Standing and Third-Party
FOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case
DOCKET # cv (2-3 letter city code) EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION PROJECT CODING FORM 1. Case name: 2. a) Judicial division and district: NDIL NDCA EDPA SDNY NDTX NDGA EDLA b) Case location: Federal Records
Legal Update: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation Law
November 7, 2012 Legal Update: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation Law Jeff Wedel jeffrey.wedel@squiresanders.com Tara Aschenbrand tara.aschenbrand@squiresanders.com Traci Martinez traci.martinez@squiresanders.com
EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program --0 EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC Ronald B. Leighton Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec
United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 6-21-2000 United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico Judge Paul J. Kelly Jr. Follow this
2015 Employment Law Practice Tips
2015 Employment Law Practice Tips November 2015 Shelley I. Ericsson Sources of Rules Laws/Regulations Policies Agreements Guidelines Employment-At-Will Working arrangements not governed by collective bargaining
2015 Employment Law Practice Tips
2015 Employment Law Practice Tips November 2015 Shelley I. Ericsson Sources of Rules Laws/Regulations Policies Agreements Guidelines Employment At Will Working arrangements not governed by collective bargaining
Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, 562 U.S. _
US Supreme Court Year in Review 2010-2011 Labor & Employment Law Cases Ty Hyderally, Esq. Colorado Bar Association 2012 National CLE Conference Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, 562 U.S. _ Eric
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE Informational Guidelines For Employees On The Process Of Filing A Complaint Under Civil Service Rule 20 On December 11, 2012, the Board of Supervisors
Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Application To Immigrant Workers
Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Application To Immigrant Workers Elizabeth Grossman EEOC Regional Attorney, New York April 5, 2012 What is the EEOC? Federal Government agency Enforces
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, No. CIV 05-376-C-RJB (EJL) AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION
EPLI Claims in the 5 th Circuit
EPLI Claims in the 5 th Circuit Presented by Charles H. Wilson Vice Chair, Office Managing Partner Cozen O Connor, P.C. (713) 750-3117 Cwilson@cozen.com What are we going to cover today? Overview of applicable
Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 8-27-2003 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and Varla Kryger, Plaintiff/Intervenor,
Atlanta. Asheville. Austin. Birmingham. Boston. Chicago. Columbia. Fairfax. Greenville. Jacksonville. Kansas City. Lakeland. Los Angeles County.
Atlanta Asheville Austin Birmingham Boston Chicago Columbia Fairfax Greenville Jacksonville Kansas City Lakeland Los Angeles County Macon Milwaukee Nashville Parsippany Port St. Lucie St. Louis Tampa Ventura
EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program Summer --0 EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc., Judge Ramona V. Manglona Follow this and additional
Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101
Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101 Presenter: Glendora C. Hughes General Counsel Maryland Commission on Civil Rights 5/12/2015 1 Discrimination Protections Maryland
B. The 1991 Civil Rights Act and the Conflict between the Circuits
Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Law By Louis Malone O Donoghue & O Donoghue A. Introduction Historically, federal courts have allowed the recovery of money damages resulting from civil rights
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WALTER L. ELLIS Plaintiff IN PRO PER FrLED 01 FEB AM : 0 BY "------ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 1 0 WAL TER L. ELLIS, an individual, on behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, And JANNA ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. LOCKHEED
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 5-31-2007 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation Judge Paul G. Cassell Follow
The Civil Rights Act of 1991
Page 1 of 18 The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission The Civil Rights Act of 1991 EDITOR'S NOTE: The text of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166), as enacted on November 21, 1991, appears
EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 4-7-2006 EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken) Judge Henry T. Wingate
OVERVIEW OF EEOC CHARGE PROCESSING
OVERVIEW OF EEOC CHARGE PROCESSING CHARGE FILING AND NOTIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS A person who believes that he or she has been discriminated against in employment because of race, color, sex, national
TUETH KEENEY COOPER MOHAN & JACKSTADT
TUETH KEENEY COOPER MOHAN & JACKSTADT P.C. Association of Corporate Counsel The Anatomy of an MHRA Claim: From the Administrative Charge through Jury Verdict November 21, 2013 Presented by Ian P. Cooper,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMANDA TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:18-cv-701 ) VITAMIN COTTAGE NATURAL ) FOOD MARKETS, INC. a/k/a
Breakfast Briefing: 10 Employment Tips You Should Know
Labor and Employment Law Breakfast Briefing: 10 Employment Tips You Should Know Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:15 a.m. 9:00 a.m. Four Seasons Hotel 98 San Jacinto Boulevard Austin, TX 78701 How Employers
SIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
SIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE No. AP3435 Discrimination and Harassment Investigations Date Adopted: 1/1/1983 Date Revised: 12/3/2010 Date Reviewed: 12/3/2010 References: 34 Code of Federal Regulations
APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT
PERSONAL INFORMATION (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) DATE: NAME: (FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST) SSN: PHONE: ALT. PHONE: E-MAIL ADDRESS: ( ) ( ) REFERRAL SOURCE WALK IN ADVERTISEMENT RELATIVE EMPLOYMENT AGENCY EMPLOYEE OTHER
Superintendent Procedure 3210SP.B Discrimination Complaint Process Approved by: s/ Larry Nyland Date: 3/8/18 Dr. Larry Nyland, Superintendent
Superintendent Procedure 3210SP.B Discrimination Complaint Process Approved by: s/ Larry Nyland Date: 3/8/18 Dr. Larry Nyland, Superintendent A. INTRODUCTION The District is committed to nondiscrimination
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 8-1-2007 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice
EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 10-23-2007 EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center Judge Sarah W. Hays Follow this and additional
Greater Nashville Regional Council 220 Athens Way, Suite 200 Nashville, Tennessee Fax:
Greater Nashville Regional Council 220 Athens Way, Suite 200 Nashville, Tennessee 37228 615-862-8828 Fax: 615-862-8840 www.gnrc.org Discrimination Complaint Form 1. Check the type of complaint you are
Wal-Mart v. Dukes What s Next for Employment Class/Collective Actions
Wal-Mart v. Dukes What s Next for Employment Class/Collective Actions Grace Speights Michael Burkhardt Paul Evans www.morganlewis.com Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, --- S. Ct. ---, 2011 WL 2437013 (June
Defense Logistics Agency Instruction. EEO Complaint Process
Defense Logistics Agency Instruction DLAI 7406 September 10, 2009 DLA-DO EEO Complaint Process References: 29 CFR, Part 1614 and EEOC MD-110. This Instruction supersedes DLA Regulation Number 1446.1, April
Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy
Revisions Adopted by President s Cabinet March 27, 2018 Adopted by President s Cabinet August 23, 2016 Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy Policy Statement: East Georgia State College affirms
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or
14'ILEJ UNrrEQ STA TES rfsffiigt COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALBUOUERQUE. NEW MEXICO FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DEC - 5 200~ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. BRINK'S, INCORPORATED,
5/16/2018 BAN THE BOX EEOC S 2012 ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES. OAPT Annual Training Program CAN I ASK THAT? INTERVIEWING TIPS AND BEST PRACTICES
OAPT Annual Training Program BAN THE BOX CAN I ASK THAT? TIPS AND BEST PRACTICES C O N S U L T A N T S TO M A N A G E M E N T Illinois: Yes prohibits employers from considering or inquiring into a job
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 4-28-2006 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood
Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (Miami Division) Case No: DAVID BALDWIN, vs. COMPLAINT Plaintiff,
EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program --0 EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc. Judge Ralph R. Beistline Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec
WESA AND THE MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. Minnesota Department of Human Rights
WESA AND THE MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT Minnesota Department of Human Rights 5/7/2015 MDHR 2 Background Governor Mark Dayton signed WESA into law on May 11, 2014. WESA amended certain aspects of Minn.
APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT - ARIZONA
APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT - ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity Policy: We are committed to providing equal employment opportunities to all employees and applicants without regard to race, religion,
Michael J. Lehet. Practice Areas. Overview
Associate 321 North Clark Street Suite 1000 Chicago, IL 60654 main: (312) 372-5520 direct: (312) 846-7026 fax: (312) 372-7880 mlehet@littler.com Camelback Esplanade 2425 East Camelback Road, Suite 900
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 6-11-2005 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.,
EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 8-23-2004 EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto Judge John E. Conway Follow
EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 4-14-11 EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club Judge Michael J. Seng Follow this and additional works
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 2-3-2016 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a
EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program --00 EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton Follow this
A Live 90-Minute Audio Conference with Interactive Q&A
presents Ricci v. DeStefano: Balancing Title VII Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact Leveraging the Supreme Court's Guidance on Employment Testing and its Impact on Voluntary Compliance Actions A
Coppin State University Complaint Form
OHR Fair USE: Practices Fair Practices Complaint Complaint Number Coppin State University Complaint Form This complaint form is to be utilized for reporting conduct that is believed to be in violation
Diversity in the Workplace Diversity Beyond the Color: Do You Really Know Me?
Diversity in the Workplace Diversity Beyond the Color: Do You Really Know Me? Presenter Dr. Arthur Holmes Chief Officer of Human Resources and Administrative Services Jasper County School District Ridgeland,
ADJUDICATION DIVISION Activity Concerning Discrimination Cases filed under the Chicago Human Rights Ordinance and Chicago Fair Housing Ordinance
City of Chicago COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS ADJUDICATION DIVISION 2008 Activity Concerning Discrimination Cases filed under the Chicago Human Rights Ordinance and Chicago Fair Housing Ordinance Chicago
Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN Adult arrests without charges; records with inaccuracies Only cases of mistaken identity or false accusations are expungeable No expungement or sealing permitted
Civil Rights. New Employee Orientation March 2018
Civil Rights New Employee Orientation March 2018 Overview A history of Civil Rights Legislation Discrimination Law What does this mean to me and my job? Discrimination may be legal Distinguishing between
EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 12-5-2002 EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated Judge M. Christina Armijo Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec
Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts
Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts Presented By: Keji A. Ayorinde, Assistant General Counsel, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
STUDENT JOB APPLICATION
STUDENT JOB APPLICATION www.jobs.hhs.ucla.edu Thank you for your interest in student employment with UCLA Housing & Hospitality Services! Please complete all five pages of this application and email along
DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND BULLYING COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Avery County Schools Policy Policy Code: 1720/4015/7225 DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND BULLYING COMPLAINT PROCEDURE The Avery County Board of Education takes seriously all complaints of unlawful discrimination,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 5-8-2000 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International
Win One, Lose One: A New Defense for California
Win One, Lose One: A New Defense for California 9/15/2001 Employment + Labor and Litigation Client Alert This Commentary highlights two recent developments in California employment law: (1) the recent
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
ELG/mjw 12/08/05 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GERALD PRICE CASE NO.: 5:04 CV 2070 228 28 TH STREET NW BARBERTON, OHIO 44203 JUDGE DOWD Plaintiff, vs. PLAINTIFF
Employment. Compliance with Federal and State Employment Law. Employee/Employer Relations. Employment Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Employment RMKB offers a broad range of employment law services. As part of the high level expertise in employment-related legal services, RMKB offers both litigation and counseling services. Compliance
Grand Rapids Public Schools
8018-R Discriminatory Harassment of Students 8018-R Procedural Steps If students, their parents/guardians, or anyone else on their behalf believe that students have been subjected to discriminatory harassment,
Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division
Order Code RS22686 June 28, 2007 Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act: A Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court s Decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. Summary
Return to facility/person you obtained the application.
Instructions for manual employment applications Today s Date: Due to the volume of applications received, we will not be able to respond to requests of application status. Please ensure you indicate your
Individual Disparate Treatment
Individual Disparate Treatment Hishon v. King & Spalding (U.S. 1984) Title VII prohibits discrimination in compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment A benefit that is part and parcel
Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Thomas A. Saenz (State Bar No. 0) Denise Hulett (State Bar No. ) Andres Holguin-Flores (State Bar No. 00) MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND S.
Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2
Case: 5:15-cv-01425-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 3. At all times material herein, Suarez Corporation was Stewart s employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 623 et seq. 4. At all times
NO , Chapter 5 TALLAHASSEE, March 13, Human Resources UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT AND UNLAWFUL SEXUAL HARASSMENT
CFOP 60-10, Chapter 5 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 60-10, Chapter 5 TALLAHASSEE, March 13, 2018 5-1. Purpose. Human Resources UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT AND
CASE NO. 1D Jeffrey Slanker and Robert J. Sniffen of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
Lawyers for employees breathed a
F O C U S MANAGED CARE LIABILITY Desert Palace v. Costa and Hill v. Lockheed Martin: One Step Forward, One Step Back by Ann Groninger Ann Groninger practices civil litigation and criminal defense with
ABA Policy on Issues Concerning Women/Gender Equality Updated 2/16/17
ABA Policy on Issues Concerning Women/Gender Equality Updated 2/16/17 Bias in the Judicial System Support the enactment of authoritative measures, requiring studies of the existence, if any, of bias in
NOTICE. 1. SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance on St. Mary s Honor Center v. Hicks, U.S., 113 S. Ct. 2742, 61 EPD 42,322 (1993).
EEOC NOTICE Number 915.002 Date 4/12/94 1. SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance on St. Mary s Honor Center v. Hicks, U.S., 113 S. Ct. 2742, 61 EPD 42,322 (1993). 2. PURPOSE: This document discusses the decision
Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:04-cv-02031-RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.
EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 9-23-2013 EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc. Judge S. Thomas Anderson Follow this and additional works at:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 539 U. S. (2003) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
Fair Housing Sexual Harassment
Fair Housing Sexual Harassment Presented by Vicki Brower 2016 The Nelrod Company, Fort Worth, Texas Tangible Costs Liability Insurance Premiums Settlement Costs Average Jury Award: $1,000,000 Winning plaintiffs
Winnebago County Circuit Clerk's Office Charlotte LeClercq, Deputy Chief (815) West State St. Rockford, IL 61101
PERSONAL Last name First name Middle name Current address City State Zip code Email address Known by other names Home phone number Alternate phone number Are you 18 years of age or older? Winnebago County
CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION
CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION First, we describe the projected future diverse workforce. Then we describe diversity and diversity
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 11-1-2000 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm
PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT & DISCRIMINATION
References: Education Code 212.5, 44100, 66010.2, 66030, and 66281.5; Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, (20 U.S.C. 1681); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794); Title VI of
Class Actions: A Continuing Threat
Employment Law Update 2011 August 4, 2011 Class Actions: A Continuing Threat James Oh, Esq. Tracy Stott Pyles, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Michelle Krall, Esq. DSW, Inc. Why Are We Here? Class Actions
Rewritten Policy and New Numbering No No (Individual Rights and Responsibilities)
Policy No. 6026 1.0 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION 1.1 The Board of Education calls upon all educators in the district to take upon themselves an individual and collective responsibility to teach their students both
State of Oregon LEGISLATIVE BRANCH PERSONNEL RULES
State of Oregon LEGISLATIVE BRANCH PERSONNEL RULES Legislative Branch Personnel Rule 27: Harassment-Free Workplace APPLICABILITY: This rule applies to members of the Legislative Assembly and all employees
EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 4-10-2006 EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC Judge Richard Alan Enslen Follow this and additional works at:
Supreme Court of the United States
No. 11-1055 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States REBECCA ATTARD, v. Petitioner, CITY OF NEW YORK and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
Courthouse News Service
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JILRIALE LYLE, Plaintiff, v. No. THE CATO CORPORATION, Defendant. COMPLAINT Comes now the Plaintiff, Jilriale Lyle,