STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
|
|
|
- Eric Lawrence
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HEARING DATE: April 13, 2016 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT JOHANNA HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. PC JEFFREY DANA, in his capacity as City Solicitor of the City of Providence; JORGE O. ELORZA, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Providence; SAMUEL D. ZURIER, in his capacity as Chairman of the Committee on Claims and Pending Suits, Providence City Council; and JAMES J. LOMBARDI III, in his capacity as Treasurer of the City of Providence, Defendants. PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL SANCTIONS, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE DEPOSITION OF MARIO MARTONE 1. Plaintiff hereby moves for sanctions against Defendants counsel for deliberately obstructing the deposition of Mr. Mario Martone. Plaintiff further seeks a protective order barring Defendants counsel from instructing Mr. Martone and other witnesses in depositions not to answer on the entirely false premise that the witness is being harassed. Finally, Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Mr. Martone to appear at a continuation of his deposition to answer questions about the Providence City Solicitor s handling of cases before the Board of Licenses in which Attorney Peter Petrarca represented clients. 2. Defendants have already agreed that this Court shall enter an order stating, in relevant part, Plaintiff is permitted to inquire into facts that establish her claim for indemnification, including but not limited to facts relevant to Defendants motives for denying her claim for indemnification.
2 3. Plaintiff has a right to show that one of Defendants motives for refusing to indemnify her legal expenses was their systematic favoritism toward Attorney Peter Petrarca. As a Commissioner of the Board of Licenses carrying out her legally prescribed duties, Plaintiff Johanna Harris objected to such favoritism because it was improper. Defendants retaliated against Ms. Harris because she got in the way. 4. During the deposition of Assistant City Solicitor Martone, which took place on March 28, 2016, Ms. Harris asked numerous questions that addressed the Defendant s favorable treatment of Mr. Petrarca. Defendants counsel James D. Cullen repeatedly instructed the witness not to answer on the grounds that the questions were irrelevant and harassing. 5. There is absolutely no evidence in the record that a single question posed to the witness was harassing. The entire deposition lasted all of one hour and 15 minutes. At no time was the witness reluctant or hesitant about answering any question. Nor did he look uncomfortable at any time. 6. Mr. Cullen s underlying motive for ordering Mr. Martone not to respond was that his answers would be damaging. 7. What follows are excerpts from the deposition of Mr. Cullen s improper objections and improper instructions to the witness. Q. Now, Mr. Petrarca recently said to the Boston Business Journal that he believed he represented approximately 75 percent of the licensees who got in trouble before the License Board. Is that roughly your idea of his representation? Do you agree with that? MR. CULLEN: Objection. I'm going to instruct him not to answer. I don't believe that that question is in any way relevant to the case. MS. HARRIS: Well, you can object to relevance, but can't tell him not to answer. MR. CULLEN: I think it's harassing, and I m going to instruct him not to answer. Q. Has Mr. Petrarca represented Pasha Hookah Lounge? MR. CULLEN: Objection, go ahead. A. Yes. 2
3 Q. Has he represented, has Mr. Petrarca represented Rock & Rye? A. Yes. Q. Has Mr. Petrarca represented Ada's Creation? MR. CULLEN: Objection. I think it's getting harassing again. I don't think it's-- MS. HARRIS: Then you can instruct him not to answer. MR. CULLEN: I'm instructing him not to answer. That's the basis. Q. Did you ever complain to the Commissioner of Public Safety Steve Paré about certain aspects that, certain actions that Mr. Petrarca took during certain hearings? MR. CULLEN: Objection. I don't think he should be required to answer that. MS. HARRIS: On what basis? MR. CULLEN: On the basis that it's harassing. It's not relevant to this case. MS. HARRIS: Why is this harassing? MR. CULLEN: You're getting into huge amounts of information about Peter Petrarca's behavior before the Board of Licenses. MS. HARRIS: That's correct. And that is a key issue in this case. Q. Are you aware that business owners in Federal Hill have stated either to you or other people that they were afraid to testify at your hearings, your show-cause hearings because they're afraid of Mr. Petrarca's clients? MR. CULLEN: Objection. I'm instructing him not to answer that question. Q. Do you recall that the day that you announced that the City was dismissing the case, Mr. Petrarca got up from his chair, walked over to me, and tossed a piece of paper at me? MR. CULLEN: Objection. Go ahead. A. I don't remember what day it was, but I remember him doing that. Q. And did you say anything to him about that? A. No. Q. Was that proper protocol? 3
4 MR. CULLEN: Objection. You don't have to answer that. He doesn't have to comment on the protocol before the Board. That's totally irrelevant. Q. Are you aware of the fact that when licensees or their attorneys have documents, they're supposed to give them to the Chair, and the Chair is supposed to distribute them? MR. CULLEN: Objection. You don't have to answer that. MS. HARRIS: So you're instructing him to not comment on protocol when he's been at every hearing virtually almost for two years? He can't comment on the protocol? MR. CULLEN: I think you're getting way off what is appropriate questioning in this case. I want to make sure that my client is protected. I don't see how the protocol at the Board is relevant. I don't see how he should be required to answer it. And I'm going to instruct him not to answer it. Q. Now, are you aware that Mr. Petrarca represented Rock & Rye? MR. CULLEN. Objection. Asked and answered. Go ahead. A. Yes. Q. And was Mr. Petrarca representing Rock & Rye when they had a show-cause -- I'm sorry, an incident that resulted in a show-cause -- the incident was on November 8, 2015? MR. CULLEN: Objection. You don't need to answer this. Again, going into the same line of what I deem to be inappropriate questioning. I'm instructing him not to answer that. MS. HARRIS: So you're instructing the witness not answer whether Mr. Petrarca was representing the Rock & Rye on November 8, correct? MR. CULLEN: Yes. Q. At the February 11 show-cause hearing on Rock & Rye, did a video recorded on the premises show that the manager had taken off his shirt? MR. CULLEN: Objection. You don't have to answer that. Same Q. Did the manager testify that he took off his shirt because he was hot? MR. CULLEN: Objection. You don't have to answer that. Same Q. Do you believe that that was false testimony? 4
5 MR. CULLEN. Objection. You don't have to answer that. Same Q. Did you make any effort to challenge the fact that that was false testimony? MR. CULLEN. Objection. You don't have to answer that. Same Q. Did Mr. Petrarca represent the Steam Pub at a show-cause hearing before the Board on April 18, 2015? MR. CULLEN. Objection. Same You don't have to answer. Respectfully submitted, JOHANNA HARRIS 3/29/2016 PO Box 9483 Providence, Rhode Island
6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 29, 2016, I filed and served this document through the Superior Court s Odyssey File and Serve electronic filing system on Defendants Jeffrey Dana, Jorge O. Elorza, Samuel D. Zurier and James J. Lombardi III and their attorney Dennis E. Carley, Roberts, Carroll, Feldstein & Peirce Inc., decarley@rcfp.com. PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, JOHANNA HARRIS PO Box 9483 Providence, Rhode Island
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
HEARING DATE: May 3, 2016 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT JOHANNA HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. PC-2015-3821 JEFFREY DANA, in his capacity as City Solicitor
Case 1:06-cv RDB Document Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-01389-RDB Document 193-2 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 6 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 2 NORTHERN DIVISION 3 ALBERT SNYDER, Civil No. RDB-06-1389 4 Plaintiff Baltimore,
Case 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# Exhibit D
Case 3:15-cv-00357-HEH-RCY Document 139-4 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 1828 Exhibit D Case 3:15-cv-00357-HEH-RCY Document 139-4 Filed 02/05/16 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 1829 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 10 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 06QS2 5 Plaintiff,
5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2010 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 2006QS2 5 Plaintiff,
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/17/2018 INDEX NO / :15 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 246 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/17/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART: 23 -------------------------------------------------------X YOUSSOUF DEMBELE a/k/a MALAHA SALIK, -against- Plaintiff, ACTION
Case 1:11-cv LAK Document Filed 02/06/11 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:11-cv-00691-LAK Document 31-21 Filed 02/06/11 Page 1 of 35 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION Page 1 3 In re: Application of ) CHEVRON
LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PAGES 1-14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. LEGGE, JUDGE LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C 99-2506 CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION,
Barbara Harris, v. Toys R Us 880 A.2d 1270 Superior Court of Pennsylvania August 3, 2005
Barbara Harris, v. Toys R Us Readers were referred to this case on page 210 of the 9 th edition Barbara Harris, v. Toys R Us 880 A.2d 1270 Superior Court of Pennsylvania August 3, 2005 Lally-Green, J.:
The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 THE NORTHEAST OHIO ) 4 COALITION FOR THE ) HOMELESS, ET AL., ) 5 ) Plaintiffs, ) 6 ) vs. ) Case No. C2-06-896 7 ) JENNIFER BRUNNER,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. The above-entitled matter came on for oral
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 0 AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, v. Appellant, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., Appellees.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE XXXXXXXXXX JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR XXXXXXXXX COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) /
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE XXXXXXXXXX JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR XXXXXXXXX COUNTY, FLORIDA XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN XXXXXXXXXXXXX, et al., Defendant / Case No.: XXXXXX MOTION TO STRIKE
2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI 2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC 88038 ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. ) 7 8 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) VS. ) June 15, ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) Defendant. ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. - ) VS. ) June, ) ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) ) Defendant.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION. 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 vs. CASE NO. C2-06-896 8 JENNIFER BRUNNER,
TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONIE M. BRINKEMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Pages 1-15)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH Civil Action No :0cv AL SHIMARI, et al, Plaintiffs, vs Alexandria, Virginia June, 0 CACI PREMIER
Case 2:15-cv DN-EJF Document 517 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:15-cv-00828-DN-EJF Document 517 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 11 JUSTIN D. HEIDEMAN (USB No. 8897) HEIDEMAN & ASSOCIATES 2696 North University Avenue, Suite 180 Provo, Utah 84604 Telephone: (801) 472-7742
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT CE-ll HON. MICHAEL I. LEVANAS, JUDGE IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ISADORE ROSENBERG, NO. BP109162 DECEASED. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA XXXX MB
9708 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2008 CA 040969XXXX MB THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR CHASEFLEX TRUST SERIES 2007-3,
The Due Process Advocate
The Due Process Advocate No Person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law - Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution Vol. 15 No. 2 www.dueprocessadvocate.com
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, ) ) 6 PLAINTIFF, ) ) 7 VS. ) NO. 1381216 ) 8 WILLIAM
STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CV WILLIAM TURNER, Plaintiff, vs.
0 0 STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT WILLIAM TURNER, vs. Plaintiff, CV-0- ROZELLA BRANSFORD, et al., Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS On the th day of November 0, at
Case 1:15-cr FDS Document 1 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:15-cr-10104-FDS Document 1 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INDICTMENT Violation: 18 USC 1623,
Case 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C
Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25 Exhibit C Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 2 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA
***************************
Case 2:14-cv-01088-KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DANNY HANNA * * Plaintiff, * * CIVIL ACTION NO. v. * * SHELL EXPLORATION AND
3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
1 4-7-10 Page 1 2 V I R G I N I A 3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 4 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 THIDA WIN, : 7 Plaintiff, : 8 versus, : GV09022748-00 9 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART X RELIABLE ABSTRACT CO.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2016 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 653850/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 211 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART 61 ----------------------------
Module 2 Legal Infrastructure
Module 2 Legal Infrastructure Part 3 Legal Infrastructure at Work Insights from Current Evidence.MP4 Media Duration: 21:11 Slide 1 Our final part looks at legal infrastructure at work. We looked at a bunch
0001 1 THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND 2 FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO.: 16-2008-CA-012971 DIVISION: CV:G 4 5 GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, ) ) 6 Plaintiff, ) ) 7 vs. ) ) 8 CARRIE GASQUE,
Amendments To Uniform Guidelines For Taxation of Costs
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
PO Box 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 0--0 brianw@operation-nation.com In Propria Persona Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 1 1, Plaintiff, vs. Maricopa County; Joseph M. Arpaio,
The Florida Bar v. Bruce Edward Committe
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. Petitioner, ) vs. ) Cause No Defendant.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH MICHAEL RAETHER AND SAVANNA ) RAETHER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Cause No. --0-0 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY;
HAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPT 24 HON. ROBERT L. HESS, JUDGE BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, ET AL, PLAINTIFF, VS MARY CUMMINS, DEFENDANT. CASE NO.: BS140207 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of
This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of the Pooling and Servicing agreement and the use of the
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO.
1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO. 304 5 ---ooo--- 6 COORDINATION PROCEEDING ) SPECIAL TITLE [Rule 1550(b)] ) 7 )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CINCINNATI INSURANCE CO., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 11-2075-JAR ) EDWARD SERRANO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARY CUMMINS Defendant W. 9th St. #110-10 Los Angeles, CA 9001 In Pro Per Telephone: (10-0 Email: mmmaryinla@aol.com SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, AMANDA LOLLAR
Lawsuit against balloonists dropped by JCM, damage lingering
Lawsuit against balloonists dropped by JCM, damage lingering By Keith Matheny August 31, 2011 Hot-air balloonists celebrated when an east valley olive farm dropped its lawsuit against them Aug. 15 after
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) Vs. Defendant.
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING 0 TODD KIMSEY, Plaintiff, Vs. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Defendant. No. CV - PA REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF STATUS CONFERENCE
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. -vs- ) FWV ) ) TRAVIS EARL JONES,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT R- FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO HONORABLE MICHAEL A. SACHS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, Case No. -vs- FWV-00 TRAVIS EARL JONES,
IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA LESLIE K. HARRIS, v. Appellant, Case No. 4D13-1620 L.T. Case No. 2010-CA-7346 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., AS TRUSTEE; and INDYMAC BANK, FSB,
Honing Your Deposition Skills 2014 Practice Pointers
www.goldbergsegalla.com NEW YORK ILLINOIS NEW JERSEY PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT UNITED KINGDOM Honing Your Deposition Skills 2014 Practice Pointers Paul S. Devine 516.281.9850 pdevine@goldbergsegalla.com
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE:. Case No. 0-.. SHARON DIANE HILL,.. USX Tower - th Floor. 00 Grant Street. Pittsburgh, PA Debtor,.. December 0, 00................
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 6. MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) ) vs. KRIS KOBACK, KANSAS SECRETARY ) OF STATE, ) Defendant.) ) Case No. CV0 ) TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS
The proceedings of the Tribunal are governed by The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
First tier Tribunal General Regulatory Chamber (Local Government Standards in England) APPLICATION FOR and NOTICE OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF A STANDARDS COMMITTEE Tribunal stamp (date received) This
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MATINNAZ CONSTRUCTION, INC., vs. Petitioner/Appellee, DIAMOND REGAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., Case No.: SC09-4786 L.T. Case No.: 1D07-4786/ 1D07-5580 Respondent/Appellant. / ON REVIEW
The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta
The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta Introduction This booklet provides basic information about appearing as a witness in the courts of Alberta. It is designed to explain your role as a witness,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity as Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party; HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC
Mock Trial Objections. The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
Mock Trial Objections The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe. Questions calling for a Narrative answer/narrating Questions that are vague and allow for a long, drawn out answer
What were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?
Quiz name: Make Your Case Debrief Activity (1-27-2016) Date: 01/27/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 8 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What were the final scores
The Municipality of Chatham-Kent Code of Conduct for Members of Council
The Municipality of Chatham-Kent Code of Conduct for Members of Council 1. Preamble The Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, at section 223.2, authorizes a municipality to establish a code of conduct
No. 1:13-CV TPG
Exhibit 45 Page 1 TODD S. HYMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, -against- No. 1:13-CV-06326-TPG PREVEZON
GEORGETOWN LAW. Georgetown University Law Center
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2009 Sunshine in Litigation Act of 2009: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Commercial and Administrative Law of the H. Comm. on the Judiciary,
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ERNEST JEROME NASH, DOC #051575, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D09-3825
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Argued and Submitted May 28, DELA CRUZ, Chief Justice, VILLAGOMEZ and BORJA, Justices.
CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT ' CNMJ FILED IN THE SOPREliE COO:RT 0]' THE CO}L OIDfEALTH OF THE NORTHE MARI IA ISLANDS ANTONIO DLG. SAWrOS, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. FRAt'iCISCO B. 1-IATSUNAGA., Defendant/Appellee.
v. 14 Civ (RJS) January 12, :05 p.m. HON. RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge APPEARANCES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------x VIOLAINE GALLAND, et al. Plaintiff, New York, N.Y. v. Civ. (RJS) JAMES JOHNSTON, et al. Defendants. ------------------------------x
Case 1:02-cv EGS-JMF Document 560 Filed 11/18/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:02-cv-02010-EGS-JMF Document 560 Filed 11/18/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RAYMING CHANG, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Civ. Action No. 02-2010 (EGS(JMF
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAVAPAI 0 PRESCOTT SPORTSMANS CLUB, by and) through Board of Directors, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MARK SMITH; TIM MASON; WILLIAM
KRESSE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 3 CASE NO. 09-49079CA22 4 5 WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, F.S.D. F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK,
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LASHONDA BRYANT, EMPLOYEE WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F900230 LASHONDA BRYANT, EMPLOYEE WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., EMPLOYER CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC., INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STEVE THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 16, 2007 v No. 264585 Jackson Circuit Court DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LC No. 01-003768-NZ Defendant-Appellee.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION FILED December 23, 1997 WILLIE JOSEPH LAGANO, Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk Appellant, No. 01C01-9701-CC-00009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Case 3:07-cv-00015 Document 7 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SHERRI BROKAW, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:07 CV 15 K DALLAS
FRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.
I. Deposition Goals A. Each deposition and each deposition question should be aimed at accomplishing a desired result. 1. Determine knowledge of relevant facts and pin down lack of knowledge of relevant
Case 3:18-cv RS Document Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 139
Case 3:18-cv-02279-RS Document 103-2 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 139 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP JOHN F. LIBBY (Bar No. CA 128207)
Transcript of Jones v Scruggs Sanctions Hearing (SF FCA) (2).TXT 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI 13 JONES, FUNDERBURG,
1 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JONES, FUNDERBURG, 14 SESSUMS, PETERSON & LEE, PLLC PLAINTIFFS 15 VERSUS NO. L2007-135 16 RICHARD SCRUGGS, INDIVIDUALLY
--8. Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/17/14 Page 1 of 216 JA_ KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 725-23 Filed in TXSD on 11/17/14 Page 1 of 216 19 1 SEN. FRASER votes --5 --7 to steal the 2 election in a democratic primary in Dallas Texas --8 3 and he brought that forward.
Effective Management of Civil Cases
Effective Management of Civil Cases Presented to: Managing Civil Trials May 9, 2007 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill So, you are a new judge? Be careful what you wish for 1 First Step Establish
PENOBSCOT COUNTY. This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by the
STATE OF MAINE PENOBSCOT, ss. JAY MCLAUGHLIN, and ELLEN MCLAUGHLIN Plaintiffs, v. PATRICK E. HUNT, Defendant. t~;ay 1:1 2009 PENOBSCOT COUNTY This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,206 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. RYAN MICHAEL PLATT, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,206 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS RYAN MICHAEL PLATT, Appellee, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Reversed. Appeal from
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 2/24/11 O Dowd v. Hardy CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
FINAL JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS STRIKING THE PLEADINGS OF PLAINTIFF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JOHANNA FADDIS, CASE NO. 11-27981CA 30 v. THE CITY OF HOMESTEAD, JUDY WALDMAN, ELVIS MALDONADO, STEPHEN SHELLEY,
21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand. 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided
1 1 CAUSE NUMBER 2011-47860 2 IN RE : VU T RAN, IN THE DISTRICT COURT 3 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 PETITIONER 164th JUDICIAL DISTRICT 5 6 7 8 9 ******************************************* * ***** 10 SEPTEMBER
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. v. Plaintiff-Respondent, HOWARD MYEROWITZ, APPROVED FOR
40609Nicoletti.txt. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing. 12 Honor. I'm counsel associated with Steve Krause and
1 1 VENTURA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2009 2 --o0o-- 3 4 5 THE COURT: Nicoletti versus Metrocities 6 Mortgage. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing 8 for the defendant Taylor, Bean and Whitaker.
information to the individual. So there would have to be compensation for our time doing that work for that researcher, and so with that in mind,
Barnaby Lewis, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer The Gila River Indian Community P.O. Box 2140 Sacaton, Arizona 85634 barnaby.lewis@gric.nsn.us 520.562.7152 Good morning everybody. My name is Barnaby
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: 3 4 Plaintiff, 5 -vs- 6 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY a municipal corporation 7 and political subdivision of the State
Case 3:15-cv RAL Document 32 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 208 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-03015-RAL Document 32 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 208 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION DENISE LIGHTNING FIRE AND WAKIYAN PETA, on behalf of
THE NEXT PHASE IS SHAHLA RABIE VS. PALACE RESORTS. THE PLAINTIFF SELECTION IS ONLY GOING TO BE CHALLENGED WHEN THE DEFENDANT CAN SHOW THAT THE
THE NEXT PHASE IS SHAHLA RABIE VS. PALACE RESORTS. THE PLAINTIFF SELECTION IS ONLY GOING TO BE CHALLENGED WHEN THE DEFENDANT CAN SHOW THAT THE PRIVATE INTEREST OF THE DEFENDANT IS INTERESTED IN PROTECTING
Case3:07-md SI Document7414 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 9
Case:0-md-0-SI Document Filed// Page of 0 Francis O. Scarpulla (0 Craig C. Corbitt ( Judith A. Zahid ( Patrick B. Clayton (0 Qianwei Fu ( Heather T. Rankie (00 ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP Montgomery
Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 584 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:12-cv-03704-VEC Document 584 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FERNANDA GARBER, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII
0 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vs. ) Civil No. --0() ) PATRICK LOWELL VERHAGEN, ) ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No AFOLUSO ADESANYA NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 17-2368 AFOLUSO ADESANYA v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP Afoluso Adesanya, *Adenekan Adesanya, Appellants *(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), Fed. R. App.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO.
THIS TRANSCRIPT IS PROTECTED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (d) 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT
NY County Index No /2016
May 9, 2018 Segal, McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd 850 Third Avenue, NY, NY, 10022 Re: EARL LIND, JR. & DOROTHY LIND - against TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF NEW YORK & TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Case 3:13-cv DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F
Case 3:13-cv-00207-DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F Case 3:13-cv-00207-DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #782 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT
The Florida Bar v. Richard Phillip Greene
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2016 12:04 PM INDEX NO. 159878/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016 1 Page 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------X
Witness testimony The question and answer method (Jack Ruby essay, p. 485) 1. Free narratives are usually not permitted.
Witness testimony The question and answer method (Jack Ruby essay, p. 485) 1. Free narratives are usually not permitted. 2. Leading questions are usually not permitted on direct examination. 1 Why not
Case 3:16-cv HZ Document 24 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:16-cv-01721-HZ Document 24 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KIERSTEN MACFARLANE, Plaintiff, No. 3:16-cv-01721-HZ OPINION & ORDER v. FIVESPICE
ALLEGRA FUNG, ESQUIRE
ALLEGRA FUNG, ESQUIRE 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: 50 2010 CA 017058 XXXX MB AW 3 4 CITIMORTGAGE, INC., 5 Plaintiff(s), 6 vs.
Staff Report Human Resources
Staff Report Human Resources Report To: Committee of the Whole Meeting Date: January 8, 2018 Report Number: FAF.18.07 Subject: Protocol Policy for Complaints Related to Members of Council and Local Boards
Kenneth Friedman, M.D. v. Heart Institute of Port St. Lucie, Inc.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. v. Case No.: CI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 07013084CI DEBBIE VISICARO, et al. Defendants. / HOMEOWNER S MEMORANDUM
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PLAINTIFF,) ) VS. ) NO. SC )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT H HON. ALLAN J. GOODMAN, JUDGE BARBRA STREISAND, ) ) PLAINTIFF,) ) VS. ) NO. SC 077257 ) KENNETH ADELMAN, ET AL., ) )
The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series
The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series The American civil judicial system is slow, and imperfect, but many times a victim s only recourse in attempting to me made whole after suffering an injury. This
13 A P P E A R A N C E S :
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/0/ :0 AM INDEX NO. / SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY : CIVIL TERM : PART --------------------------------------------x ACCESS INDUSTRIES I INC. l -
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE-CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Back to previous page: http://legalrequest.net/0/0/0/draft-discovery-requests-and-responses/ 0 ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY Main St. Suite City, CA Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Email: attorney@law.com