SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011
|
|
- Nickolas Lynch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT CE-ll HON. MICHAEL I. LEVANAS, JUDGE IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ISADORE ROSENBERG, NO. BP DECEASED. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011 APPEARANCES: FOR RESPONDENT AND MOVING PARTY ONEWEST BANK : FOR PETITIONER AND RESPONDING PARTY STEVEN MARK ROSENBERG: FOR FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE: GARRETT & TULLY, PC BY : JENNIFER R. SLATER ATTORNEY AT LAW 225 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE SUITE 1400 PASADENA, CA (626) STEWART J. LEVIN, ESQ WILSHIRE BOULEVARD BEVERLY HILLS, CA (310) FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP BY: JUDITH E. DEMING ATTORNEY AT LAW (VIA COURTCALL) 915 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA (213) CLARECE ENGLISH PETERS C.S.R. NO OFFICIAL REPORTER
2 1 1 CASE NUMBER: BP CASE NAME: IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ISADORE 3 ROSENBERG, DECEASED 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, MAY 5, DEPARTMENT CE-ll 6 APPEARANCES: 7 REPORTER: 8 TIME: 9 HON. MICHAEL I. LEVANAS, JUDGE {AS HERETOFORE NOTED.) CLARECE ENGLISH PETERS, CSR #5667 A.M. SESSION NOS. 311, 312, ROSENBERG. 11 MS. DEMING: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. ON COURTCALL 12 JUDITH DEMING FOR FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE. 13 MS. SLATER: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR; JENNIFIER 14 SLATER ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT AND MOVING PARTY ONEWEST 15 BANK. 16 MR. LEVIN: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR; STUART LEVIN ON 17 BEHALF OF PETITIONER, WHO IS THE RESPONDING PARTY TO THE 18 MOTION TO COMPEL ON CALENDAR TODAY. 19 MR. ROSENBERG : GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. I'M STEVEN 20 MARK ROSENBERG, PERSONAL ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE AND SUCCESSOR 21 TRUSTEE. 22 ALL RIGHT. IN THIS CASE, THE COURT'S 23 TENTATIVE IS TO THE MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES BROUGHT BY 24 ONEWEST BANK. THE COURT'S TENTATIVE IS TO DENY THIS 25 REQUEST. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT MOVING PARTY WAS A PARTY 26 TO THE ACTION AT THE TIME THAT THE MOVING PARTY PROPOUNDED 27 THE DISCOVERY. MOVING PARTY WAS ONLY ADDED AS A PARTY ON 28 APRIL 13TH, 2011, BY RESPONDING PARTY'S FIRST AMENDED
3 2 1 COMPLAINT. THE COURT DOES NOTE THAT WHILE MOVING PARTY 2 ATTEMPTED TO INSERT HIMSELF INTO THE CASE BY RESPONDING TO 3 RESPONDING PARTY'S PETITION, MOVING PARTY DID NOT PROPERLY 4 SEEK INTERVENTION PURSUANT TO C. C.P. SECTION 387(A). 5 ACCORDINGLY, THE MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES SHOULD BE 6 DENIED. 7 THE COURT WILL HEAR ARGUMENT REGARDING 8 SANCTIONS. 9 MS. SLATER: YOUR HONOR, MY CLIENT FILED AN ANSWER TO 10 THE PETITION BACK IN I'M SORRY. 12 MS. SLATER: MY CLIENT, ONEWEST BANK, WAS ERRONEOUSLY 13 NAMED, AND ACTUALLY IT WAS MERS THAT WAS ERRONEOUSLY NAMED 14 AS THE -BENEFICIARY. THERE'S AN ASSIGNMENT OF RECORD, WHICH 15 IS ONE OF THE EXHIBITS TO OUR REPLY BRIEF, THAT SHOWS THAT 16 MERS HAD ASSIGNED ITS BENEFICIAL RIGHTS IN THE DEED OF TRUST 17 AT ISSUE TO INDYMAC BANK. IT'S EXHIBIT 1 TO MY REPLY BRIEF. 18 AFTER THAT TIME, INDYMAC BANK HAD EVENTUALLY BECOME UNDER 19 RECEIVERSHIP WITH THE F.D.I.C. AND IN MARCH OF 2009, MY 20 CLIENT, ONEWEST BANK, OBTAINED ALL THE ACTUAL RIGHTS AND 21 INTERESTS IN THAT DEED OF TRUST. 22 ONEWEST BANK WAS NOT NAMED AS A RESPONDENT IN 23 THE PETITION. THAT IS CORRECT, YOUR HONOR, BUT RESPONDENT, 24 ONEWEST BANK, FILED AN ANSWER ON BEHALF OF ITSELF SAYING 25 THAT IT WAS ERRONEOUSLY NAMED AS MERS IN THE 850 PETITION. 26 AND THAT WAS FILED, I BELIEVE IT WAS IN MAY OF THERE 27 WAS NO OBJECTION TO ONEWEST BANK'S INSERTION INTO THE 28 ACTION.
4 3 1 AT THAT TIME IN, I BELIEVE IT WAS AUGUST OF , THEY SERVED DISCOVERY REQUESTS ON PETITIONER'S 3 COUNSEL. PETITIONER ASKED FOR SEVERAL EXTENSIONS. THOSE 4 EXTENSIONS WERE GRANTED. EVENTUALLY PETITIONER'S COUNSEL 5 INDICATED THAT HE WOULD NOT BE RESPONDING TO DISCOVERY THAT 6 WAS PROPOUNDED BY ONEWEST BANK; THAT HE WOULD ONLY RESPOND 7 TO DISCOVERY THAT WAS PROPOUNDED ON BY MERS. HE DID RESPOND 8 TO THAT DISCOVERY. AFTER THAT, MY ASSOCIATE, MS. CHANG, HAD 9 SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS WITH MR. LEVIN INDICATING THAT SHE HAD 10 NOT RECEIVED THE DISCOVERY RESPONSES. EXTENSIONS WERE 11 GRANTED. EVENTUALLY, HE INDICATED, "I DON'T NEED TO RESPOND 12 TO DISCOVERY," HOW IT'S SIMILAR. SHE GAVE HIM THE OPTION OF 13 ONLY RESPONDING TO THOSE INTERROGATORIES THAT WERE SPECIFIC 14 TO ONEWEST BANK, AND THEN INDICATED THAT HE COULD 15 INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE HIS RESPONSES TO THE MERS 16 DISCOVERY. 17 SO THERE'S SEVERAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS 18 FOR PRODUCTION THAT ARE SPECIFIC. ONLY TO ONEWEST BANK, AND 19 MR. LEVIN JUST DID NOT RESPOND TO ALL. WE'VE GIVEN HIM 20 SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITIES TO RESPOND TO THOSE REQUESTS FOR 21 PRODUCTION AND INTERROGATORIES. AND WITHOUT ANY 22 JUSTIFICATION, HE JUST COMPLETELY DECIDED THAT HE DIDN'T 23 NEED TO RESPOND. 24 THE DISCOVERY IS DIRECTLY RELEVANT TO THE 25 CONTENTIONS THAT ARE MADE IN THE 850 PETITION. AND YOUR 26 HONOR, IT'S JUST THIS GAMESMANSHIP IN DECIDING THAT HE WANTS 27 TO HAVE ONEWEST BANK NOW AS A PARTY TO THE ACTION, BUT 28 DOESN'T WANT TO RESPOND TO ITS DISCOVERY.
5 4 1 NO, NO. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT, AND MAYBE 2 IT'S TECHNICAL, BUT THE POINT WHERE THIS DISCOVERY WAS 3 PROPOUNDED, IT WAS ONLY PROPOUNDED ON THE BASIS THAT YOU 4 ANSWERED AND INSERTED YOURSELF INTO THE LITIGATION, AND 5 DIDN'T YOU COMPLY WITH C.C. P IT'S NOT A QUESTION OF 6 WHETHER OR NOT YOU, AT THIS POINT BECAUSE YOU'RE NAMED IN 7 THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, YOU CAN PROPOUND DISCOVERY. IT'S 8 JUST THAT IT WASN'T PROPOUNDED AT A TIME WHEN YOU WERE 9 PROPERLY IN THE CASE. THAT'S THE ONLY ISSUE. 10 MS. SLATER : I UNDERSTAND THAT. WELL, SANCTIONS ARE 11 NOT APPROPRIATE AGAINST MY CLIENT BECAUSE MY CLIENT WAS 12 ACTING IN GOOD FAITH. 13 ALL RIGHT. OKAY. I'LL GET BACK TO YOU 14 IF I THINK SANCTIONS ARE TO BE AWARDED. OKAY? MS. SLATER : OKAY. ANY DISCUSSION REGARDING SANCTIONS? 17 MR. LEVIN: YES, YOUR HONOR. YOUR HONOR, THE 18 DISCOVERY ACT IS SPECIFICALLY SET UP TO PROVIDE FOR THE FLOW 19 OF INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE VERIFIED THAT CAN BE 20 USED AT TRIAL. I MADE EVERY ATTEMPT IN GOOD FAITH TO ACT AS 21 A BROKER SO THAT THE FACT THAT THERE WAS A GREAT DEAL OF 22 CONFUSION CAUSED BY, IN THIS CASE, THE MOVING PARTY, COULD 23 BE ALLEVIATED IN THE SENSE THAT WE COULD HAVE -- THEY COULD 24 HAVE TAKEN WHATEVER STEPS THEY WANTED. 25 I SAID, "LISTEN, I'LL GIVE YOU A FULL 26 EXTENSION. YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE TIME YOU WANT, IN CASE YOU 27 EVER DECIDE TO BRING A MOTION ON BEHALF OF THE BANK. BUT IN 28 THE MEANTIME, PROPERLY PROPOUND YOUR DISCOVERY ON BEHALF OF
6 5 1 [viers. MY CLIENT WILL ANSWER ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING, " WHICH 2 IS ~\HAT HAPPENED. 3 MY CLIENT HAS GIVEN SIX BOXES OF ORGANIZED 4 FILING DOCUMENTS. MY CLIENT RESPONDED TO APPROXIMATELY SPECIAL I NTERROGATORIES. MY CLIENT RESPONDED TO ALL THE 6 FORM INTERROGATORIES. WE WERE ALLOWING THEM CARTE BLANCHE, 7 RED CARPET TREATMENT. THEY COULD HAVE ANY DISCOVERY THEY 8 WANTED. AND IN FACT, MS. CHANG TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THAT TO 9 THE EXTENT THAT SHE THEN PROPOUNDED, ON BEHALF OF MERS, OVER 10 A HUNDRED AND TWENTY SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES WHICH WE 11 PROPERLY RESPONDED TO. THERE WAS NO COMPLAINT. 12 INSTEAD OF BEING SATISFIED WITH THAT OR INSTEAD 13 OF JUST PROPOUNDING WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO ON BEHALF OF 14 MERS OR INSTEAD OF WAITING UNTIL MY MOTION TO AMEND WAS 15 GRANTED WHEN THE BANK COULD PROPOUND DISCOVERY, FOR NO 16 REASON AT ALL, FOR NO REASON AT ALL THAT HAS ANY 17 SUBSTANTIATIVE JUSTIFICATION IN TERMS OF THE DISCOVERY THAT 18 MY CLIENT AND I WERE PROVIDING IN GOOD FAITH, THEY FILED 19 THIS MOTION. 20 NOW, I'VE HAD TO SPEND ABOUT THREE-AND-A-HALF 21 HOURS OF MY TIME RESPONDING IN WRITING. I'VE HAD TO COME 22 DOWN HERE THIS MORNING. I MEAN, THESE ARE TOTALLY 23 UNNECESSARY EXPENDITURES OF MY TIME. 24 OKAY. LET ME ASK A QUESTION, IF I COULD. 25 WHEN DID YOU FIRST NOTIFY BANK OF THE WEST 26 (SIC) THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE A RIGHT TO PROPOUND DISCOVERY 27 BECAUSE AT THE TIME THEY PROPOUNDED IT, THEY'RE NOT A PARTY? 28 WHEN DID YOU RAISE THAT?
7 6 1 MR. LEVIN: DURING THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS AFTER 2 THEY PROPOUNDED -- 3 WHICH DOCUMENT IN YOUR MOVING PAPERS 4 SUPPORTS THAT? 5 MR. LEVIN: WELL, IN MY DECLARATION, YOUR HONOR, I - 6 YOUR DECLARATION? 7 8 MR. LEVIN: PARAGRAPH 12. LET ME JUST GET THERE. PARAGRAPH OKAY. MR. LEVIN: AND THEN CONTINUES TO DESCRIBE THE 11 EXTENSIVE MEET AND CONFER, WHICH WAS IN GOOD FAITH ON OUR 12 PART, JUST SO WE COULD AVOID HAVING TO COME TO COURT TODAY 13 UNNECESSARILY. 14 NO, NO. THIS DECLARATION DOESN'T SAY 15 THAT THAT'S THE REASON THAT YOU INDICATED YOU WERE NOT GOING 16 TO RESPOND. 17 WHEN DID YOU FIRST TELL ONEWEST BANK THAT THEY 18 WERE NOT ENTITLED TO DISCOVERY BECAUSE WHEN THE SERVED IT, 19 THEY WERE NOT PARTIES TO THE ACTION? 20 MR. LEVIN: IN MY DECLARATION I SAY, AFTER IT WAS 21 SERVED, I CALLED CANDI CHANG OF GARRETT & TOLLEY, AND I TOLD 22 MS. CHANG MY CLIENT COULD NOT, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, RESPOND 23 TO THE DISCOVERY OF ONEWEST BANK. AND THEN AT THAT POINT, I 24 SAID, "WELL, WE'LL GIVE YOU AN OPEN EXTENSION. JUST 25 PROPOUND YOUR DISCOVERY ON BEHALF OF MERS," WHICH MS. CHANG 26 THEN DID. 27 WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU COULDN'T IN GOOD 28 CONSCIENCE?
8 7 1 2 I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND THAT. MR. LEVIN: BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT A PARTY. I MEAN, 3 THEY WERE NOT A PARTY TO THIS ACTION. 4 WHERE, EXCEPT FOR THIS, DID YOU PROVIDE 5 ANY NOTICE TO THEM THAT THAT WAS THE BASIS YOU WERE NOT 6 RESPONDING TO 7 8 MR. LEVIN: I SPOKE TO MS. CHANG AND I TOLD HER. ANY DECLARATION BEFORE ME, OTHER THAN 9 THIS ONE, THAT RELATES SPECIFICALLY TO THAT? 10 MR. ROSENBERG: YOUR HONOR, WHILE MY COUNSEL IS 11 LOOKING FOR THAT NO. LET HIM HAVE A CHANCE TO LOOK AT HIS 13 PAPERS. 14 MR. ROSENBERG: ALL RIGHT. 15 MR. LEVIN: I MEAN, YOUR HONOR, STARTING ON PARAGRAPH 16 8, I MEAN I INDICATE. I CALLED CANDI CHANG. WE DISCUSSED 17 THE FACT THAT ONEWEST BANK AND MERS WERE TWO SEPARATE 18 ENTITIES. AND MY WHOLE DECLARATION IS BASICALLY BASED UPON 19 THE FACT THAT AS I SAY IN PARAGRAPH 11, MR. ROSENBERG 20 REFUSED TO ANSWER DISCOVERY BROUGHT BY ONEWEST BANK BECAUSE 21 ONEWEST BANK WAS NEVER ACTUALLY NAMED OR SERVED AS A PARTY 22 RESPONDENT. THIS IS THE WHOLE NATURE OF OUR MEET AND 23 CONFER, WHICH IS QUITE SPECIFIC IN PARAGRAPH MS. SLATER: YOUR HONOR, CAN I SAY ONE THING? 25 I THINK THE POINT IS, HE KEPT GIVING US 26 EXTENSIONS IN TIME, ALLUDING TO THE FACT THAT MAYBE WE'RE 2 7 GOING TO BE ABLE TO WORK IT OUT. HE NEVER REALLY REACHED A 28 RESOLUTION THAT HE WASN'T GOING TO RESPOND AT ALL TO THE
9 8 1 DISCOVERY ON BEHALF OF ONEWEST BANK. AND HAD HE SIMPLY 2 RESPONDED TO OUR LATTER REQUESTS FOR MEET AND CONFERS IN 3 FEBRUARY AND MARCH BEFORE WE FILED THE MOTION, HE COULD HAVE 4 SAID, "LOOK, I'M FILING AN AMENDED PETITION," OR "I'M 5 SEEKING LEAVE TO DO SO. CAN WE EXTEND THIS OUT AND SEE IF 6 WE CAN WORK THIS OUT; " AND HE DIDN'T DO THAT. HE JUST 7 DIDN'T RESPOND AT ALL. 8 ALL RIGHT. THE COURT WILL ORDER 9 SANCTIONS TO BE PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $750. THAT'S DENIED 10 WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 11 MR. LEVIN: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. 12 MR. ROSENBERG: CAN I SPEAK, YOUR HONOR, JUST BY WAY 13 OF HAVING MY OWN DAY IN COURT? 14 NO, NO. YOU HAVE A LAWYER. HE'S DONE A 15 GOOD JOB HERE TODAY, AND I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE THE END 16 OF OUR HEARING FOR TODAY'S PURPOSES. 17 MS. SLATER: YOUR HONOR, IS THERE A DEADLINE ON THE 18 SANCTIONS AWARD? 19 THIRTY DAYS THE CLERK: IS THAT TO MR. ROSENBERG? YES (THE PROCEEDINGS WERE CONCLUDED.)
KRESSE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 3 CASE NO. 09-49079CA22 4 5 WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, F.S.D. F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK,
More informationHAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPT 24 HON. ROBERT L. HESS, JUDGE BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, ET AL, PLAINTIFF, VS MARY CUMMINS, DEFENDANT. CASE NO.: BS140207 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) Vs. Defendant.
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING 0 TODD KIMSEY, Plaintiff, Vs. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Defendant. No. CV - PA REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF STATUS CONFERENCE
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE:. Case No. 0-.. SHARON DIANE HILL,.. USX Tower - th Floor. 00 Grant Street. Pittsburgh, PA Debtor,.. December 0, 00................
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. Petitioner, ) vs. ) Cause No Defendant.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH MICHAEL RAETHER AND SAVANNA ) RAETHER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Cause No. --0-0 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY;
More informationScott A. Walter, 1/13/2010 Page: 1
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 AT SEATTLE Scott A. Walter, 1/13/2010 Page: 1 Page 1 4 5 In Re: Case No. 07-13346-KAO 6 Steven C. Bateman and 7 Virginia T. Lee, 8 Debtors.
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, ) ) 6 PLAINTIFF, ) ) 7 VS. ) NO. 1381216 ) 8 WILLIAM
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/17/2018 INDEX NO / :15 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 246 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/17/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART: 23 -------------------------------------------------------X YOUSSOUF DEMBELE a/k/a MALAHA SALIK, -against- Plaintiff, ACTION
More informationCase 2:08-cv AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1
Case 2:08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 3 HONORABLE A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO.
1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO. 304 5 ---ooo--- 6 COORDINATION PROCEEDING ) SPECIAL TITLE [Rule 1550(b)] ) 7 )
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII
0 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vs. ) Civil No. --0() ) PATRICK LOWELL VERHAGEN, ) ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT 61 BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE 0 DAVID RADEL, ) ) Plaintiff, )No. -0-000-CU-FR-CTL ) vs. ) ) RANCHO CIELO
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARY CUMMINS Defendant W. 9th St. #110-10 Los Angeles, CA 9001 In Pro Per Telephone: (10-0 Email: mmmaryinla@aol.com SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, AMANDA LOLLAR
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS SS. COUNTY OF COOK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Case No. 1 CR -01 Plaintiff, VS RYNE SANHAMEL,
More informationLARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PAGES 1-14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. LEGGE, JUDGE LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C 99-2506 CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/18/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/18/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01//17 01:37 PM INDEX NO. 650082/17 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01//17 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL TERM: PART 49 X ART CAPITAL
More information40609Nicoletti.txt. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing. 12 Honor. I'm counsel associated with Steve Krause and
1 1 VENTURA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2009 2 --o0o-- 3 4 5 THE COURT: Nicoletti versus Metrocities 6 Mortgage. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing 8 for the defendant Taylor, Bean and Whitaker.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAVAPAI 0 PRESCOTT SPORTSMANS CLUB, by and) through Board of Directors, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MARK SMITH; TIM MASON; WILLIAM
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 6. MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) ) vs. KRIS KOBACK, KANSAS SECRETARY ) OF STATE, ) Defendant.) ) Case No. CV0 ) TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS
More information21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand. 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided
1 1 CAUSE NUMBER 2011-47860 2 IN RE : VU T RAN, IN THE DISTRICT COURT 3 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 PETITIONER 164th JUDICIAL DISTRICT 5 6 7 8 9 ******************************************* * ***** 10 SEPTEMBER
More information2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI 2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC 88038 ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. ) 7 8 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY,
More informationPage 1. 10:10 a.m. Veritext Legal Solutions
1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., etc. 4 Plaintiff, 5 vs. Case No. CV-12-789401 6 EDGEWATER REALTY, LLC, et al. 7 Defendant. 8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More information3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
1 4-7-10 Page 1 2 V I R G I N I A 3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 4 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 THIDA WIN, : 7 Plaintiff, : 8 versus, : GV09022748-00 9 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT
More informationThis is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of
This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of the Pooling and Servicing agreement and the use of the
More informationThe Florida Bar v. Bruce Edward Committe
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al.
0 0 COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------- ARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., -against- Appellant, CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al. Respondents. ----------------------------------------
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 3 In the matter of the application of MIDWEST ENERGY COOPERATIVE (i) for a
1 1 STATE OF MICHIGAN 2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 3 In the matter of the application of MIDWEST ENERGY COOPERATIVE (i) for a Case U-17099-R 4 power supply cost recovery reconciliation
More informationPage 5 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 THE COURT: All we have left is Number 5 and 3 then Mr. Stopa's. Are you ready to proceed? 4 MR. SPANOLIOS: Your Honor
Page 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 3 4 5 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs CASE NO: 2009-CA-002668 8 TONY ROBINSON and DEBRA ROBINSON,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CI-19 UCN: CA015815XXCICI
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-015815-CI-19 UCN: 522008CA015815XXCICI INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Successor in Interest to INDYMAC BANK,
More informationCase 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document 335 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 68
Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document Filed 0// Page of Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document Filed 0// Page of. I have reviewed the Affidavit of John P. Rohner (the Rohner Affidavit ), filed with the Court on August,
More informationPage 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE
Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 09 001184 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, Plaintiff, -vs- MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
More information5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 10 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 06QS2 5 Plaintiff,
More information5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2010 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 2006QS2 5 Plaintiff,
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 DEPARTMENT CJC 48 HON. CHRISTOPHER K. LUI, JUDGE
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 DEPARTMENT CJC 48 HON. CHRISTOPHER K. LUI, JUDGE 4 5 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,) ) 6 PLAINTIFF,) VS. ) CASE NO.
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch 9
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch FILED 0-0-1 CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY, WI 1CV000 AMY LYNN PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 1 CV CITY OF MADISON, et al., Defendants.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO.
THIS TRANSCRIPT IS PROTECTED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (d) 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C
Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25 Exhibit C Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 2 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA
More informationCase 3:11-cv REP Document 132 Filed 01/28/12 Page 1 of 153 PageID# 2426 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case :-cv-00-rep Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION 0 -------------------------------------- : GILBERT JAMES :
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT 85 HON. JAMES C. CHALFANT, JUDGE ) CASE NO: BS145904
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT HON. JAMES C. CHALFANT, JUDGE JOHN RANDO, ET AL., ) ) PETITIONERS, ) ) VS. KAMALA HARRIS, ET AL., ) ) RESPONDENTS. ) )
More informationPage 1. VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE. Defendant(s). VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE Counterclaimants and Third Party Plaintiffs, vs.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION - ATLANTIC COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-10209-08 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-AB3 Plaintiff(s),
More informationJames M. Maloney. Attorney at Law Proctor in Admiralty. P.O. Box Bayview Avenue Port Washington, NY April 7, 2014
admitted to practice in New York; New Jersey; United States Supreme Court; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the District of Connecticut, Northern District
More information13 A P P E A R A N C E S :
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/0/ :0 AM INDEX NO. / SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY : CIVIL TERM : PART --------------------------------------------x ACCESS INDUSTRIES I INC. l -
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
More informationE-FILED: Jun 13, :57 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G-84481
E-FILED Jun 13, 2016 1:57 PM David H. Yamasaki Chief Executive Officer/Clerk Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara Case #1-13-CV-258281 Filing #G-84481 By A. Ramirez, Deputy Exhibit A SUPERIOR
More information0001 1 THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND 2 FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO.: 16-2008-CA-012971 DIVISION: CV:G 4 5 GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, ) ) 6 Plaintiff, ) ) 7 vs. ) ) 8 CARRIE GASQUE,
More informationExhibit 13. Case 1:15-cv TDS-JEP Document Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 5
Exhibit Case :-cv-00-tds-jep Document - Filed 0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMON CAUSE, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Civil Action No. :-CV--WO-JEP
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE Commission
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE Commission In the matter of the application of Consumers Energy Company for authority to reconcile electric DOCKET
More informationCase4:10-cv SBA Document81 Filed05/31/11 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-SBA Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, VS. PLAINTIFF, SANDISK CORPORATION, ET AL,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII. Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL NO Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL NO. -- ELAINE E. KAWASAKI, et al., Defendant. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS before the HONORABLE, GLENN
More informationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals Historic Courthouse 430 E Street, NW Washington, DC (202)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Historic Courthouse 430 E Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 879-2700 Representing Yourself in an Agency Appeal. INTRODUCTION This guide is for people who don t
More informationFOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. -vs- ) FWV ) ) TRAVIS EARL JONES,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT R- FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO HONORABLE MICHAEL A. SACHS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, Case No. -vs- FWV-00 TRAVIS EARL JONES,
More informationOFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION
OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION NICOLE MONTGOMERY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ORBITZ, LLC, Defendant. Superior Court of the State of California
More informationV. CASE NO CA-00669
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR. APPELLANT V. CASE NO. 2011-CA-00669 PAMELA RENE SMITH BRYANT APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
More informationThe Due Process Advocate
The Due Process Advocate No Person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law - Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution Vol. 15 No. 2 www.dueprocessadvocate.com
More information1/2/ ANNETTE FAKLIS MORIARTY, C.S.R.
1/2/2019 2019-1 ANNETTE FAKLIS MORIARTY, C.S.R. BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF LISLE MUNICIPAL OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE ) OBJECTIONS OF: ) ) MICHAEL HANTSCH ) ) Objector, ) No. 2019-1 ) VS.
More informationSTATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CV WILLIAM TURNER, Plaintiff, vs.
0 0 STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT WILLIAM TURNER, vs. Plaintiff, CV-0- ROZELLA BRANSFORD, et al., Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS On the th day of November 0, at
More informationGLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) VS. ) February 2, ) ) Defendants. ) ) TAMERLANE GLOBAL SERVICES, et al.,) MOTIONS HEARING
Case :-cv-0-gbl-idd Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy # (KG)...
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy #07-11337 (KG)... Wilmington, DE December 5, 2007 10:00 a.m. TRANSCRIPT OF
More informationCase 1:06-cv RDB Document Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-01389-RDB Document 193-2 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 6 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 2 NORTHERN DIVISION 3 ALBERT SNYDER, Civil No. RDB-06-1389 4 Plaintiff Baltimore,
More informationCASE NO.: CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February 5, 2013
CASE NO.: 0--00-CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February, 0 0 0 REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME OF VOLUMES TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. DC--0-A DALLAS, TEXAS CONSUMER SERVICE ALLIANCE ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 4:11-cr JST USA v. Su. Document 193. View Document.
PlainSite Legal Document California Northern District Court Case No. :-cr-00-jst USA v. Su Document View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation.
More informationONTARIO, INC., Appellant, Respondent
0 COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------- ONTARIO, INC., -against- Appellant, SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION, Respondent. ---------------------------------------- Before: No.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. The above-entitled matter came on for oral
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 0 AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, v. Appellant, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., Appellees.
More information1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION. 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 vs. CASE NO. C2-06-896 8 JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More informationTRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONIE M. BRINKEMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Pages 1-15)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH Civil Action No :0cv AL SHIMARI, et al, Plaintiffs, vs Alexandria, Virginia June, 0 CACI PREMIER
More information5 v. 11 Cv (JSR) 6 SONAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., 7 Defendants x 9 February 17, :00 p.m.
Case 1:11-cv-09665-JSR Document 20 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 20 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------x 3 SIDNEY GORDON, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 11 Cv.
More information7 2:40 p.m. 8 Before:
SEAED i 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - --x 3 IN RE: GRA JUY SUBPEONA SERVED ON ACLU 1 4 5 -------------------------------
More informationRipka, Boroski & Associates
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of Consumers Energy Company for authority to increase its rates for the generation and distribution of
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, ARRAIGNMENT & BAIL MODIFICATION 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 375 & 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA XXXX MB
9708 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2008 CA 040969XXXX MB THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR CHASEFLEX TRUST SERIES 2007-3,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2018
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COONTY OF NEW YORK -x STEPHEN FREIDUS, Individually and derivatively as a General Partner on behalf of 62 WEST 45TH STREET ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, -against- Index
More information(718) Jordan Greenberger, Esq. Ouzounian v. Herrera et al.; No /2017 Scheduling Sanctions Motion (Motion Sequence 006)
The law practice of J. GREENBERGER, PLLC (718) 502-9555 Jordan Greenberger, Esq. www.jgreenbergerlaw.com jordan@jgreenbergerlaw.com VIA E-FILING & UPS OVERNIGHT Hon. Charles E. Ramos Sup. Ct., NY County
More informationDoes Citizen Engagement Really Make a Difference?
Does Citizen Engagement Really Make a Difference? Week 1: Video transcript Featuring John Gaventa Professorial Fellow, Institute of Development Studies and Director of the Coady International Institute
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF MACON SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. 10 CRS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF MACON SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. CRS 00 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) TRANSCRIPT VS. ) Volume I of V ISAAC HUTCHINSON BIRCH ) (pgs. -
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART X RELIABLE ABSTRACT CO.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2016 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 653850/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 211 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART 61 ----------------------------
More informationCase 3:13-cv DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F
Case 3:13-cv-00207-DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F Case 3:13-cv-00207-DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #782 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase 2:11-cr KJM Document 142 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. --o0o-- Plaintiff,
Case :-cr-00-kjm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA --o0o-- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) Case No. :-cr-00-kjm ) formerly :-mj-00-kjn ) )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RENFROW, Defendant.... APPEARANCES: For the Plaintiff: For the Defendant: Court Reporter: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Docket No. -0-CM
More informationCase 2:11-cr KJM Document 258 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
Case :-cr-00-kjm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ---ooo--- BEFORE THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, JUDGE ---ooo--- UNITED STATES
More informationFROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM. Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA (AW)
FROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2009 CA 025833 (AW) DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) )
More informationCase 1:11-cv LAK Document Filed 02/06/11 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:11-cv-00691-LAK Document 31-21 Filed 02/06/11 Page 1 of 35 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION Page 1 3 In re: Application of ) CHEVRON
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PLAINTIFF,) ) VS. ) NO. SC )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT H HON. ALLAN J. GOODMAN, JUDGE BARBRA STREISAND, ) ) PLAINTIFF,) ) VS. ) NO. SC 077257 ) KENNETH ADELMAN, ET AL., ) )
More informationCase 1:04-cv JJF Document Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A
Case :0-cv-0-JJF Document - Filed 0//00 Page of EXHIBIT A Case :0-cv-0-JJF Document - Filed 0//00 Page of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CRIMINAL DIVISION
0 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS: COUNTY OF C O O K ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CRIMINAL DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE ) OF ILLINOIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. CR 0-0
More informationJustice Andrea Hoch: It is my pleasure. Thank you for inviting me.
Mary-Beth Moylan: Hello, I'm Mary-Beth Moylan, Associate Dean for Experiential Learning at McGeorge School of Law, sitting down with Associate Justice Andrea Lynn Hoch from the 3rd District Court of Appeal.
More informationB e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE DAVIS MR JUSTICE CRANSTON. Between:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION DIVISIONAL COURT CO/3452/2007 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 31 July 2014 B e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE DAVIS MR JUSTICE CRANSTON
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 In re Los Angeles Asbestos Litigation General Orders SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case No. C 00000 THIRD AMENDED GENERAL ORDER NO. 0 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
More informationEnglish as a Second Language Podcast ESL Podcast Legal Problems
GLOSSARY to be arrested to be taken to jail, usually by the police, for breaking the law * The police arrested two women for robbing a bank. to be charged to be blamed or held responsible for committing
More informationIN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA LESLIE K. HARRIS, v. Appellant, Case No. 4D13-1620 L.T. Case No. 2010-CA-7346 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., AS TRUSTEE; and INDYMAC BANK, FSB,
More informationAmendments To Uniform Guidelines For Taxation of Costs
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More information1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 UTAH, : 4 Petitioner : No v. : 6 EDWARD JOSEPH STRIEFF, JR. : 7 x. 8 Washington, D.C.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 2 x 3 UTAH, : 4 Petitioner : No. 14 1373 5 v. : 6 EDWARD JOSEPH STRIEFF, JR. : 7 x 8 Washington, D.C. 9 Monday, February 22, 2016 10 11 The above entitled
More information>>> THE SECOND CASE IS GRIDINE V. THE STATE OF FLORIDA. YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M GAIL ANDERSON REPRESENTING MR.
>>> THE SECOND CASE IS GRIDINE V. THE STATE OF FLORIDA. YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M GAIL ANDERSON REPRESENTING MR. SHIMEEKA GRIDINE. HE WAS 14 YEARS OLD WHEN HE COMMITTED ATTEMPTED
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2006 9
More informationPh Fax Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 50 2008 CA 028558 XXXX MB DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS
More informationAppellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/08/2016 Page: 1. Re: Supplemental Authority in Fish, et al. v. Kobach, Case No.
Appellate Case: - Document: 0 Date Filed: 0/0/0 Page: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION NATIONAL OFFICE BROAD STREET, TH FL. NEW YORK, NY 00-00 T/.. F/-- WWW.ACLU.ORG Elisabeth Shumaker Clerk of
More informationThe Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 THE NORTHEAST OHIO ) 4 COALITION FOR THE ) HOMELESS, ET AL., ) 5 ) Plaintiffs, ) 6 ) vs. ) Case No. C2-06-896 7 ) JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Volume Pages 0 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before The Honorable Vince Chhabria, Judge EDWARD HARDEMAN, Plaintiff, VS. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant. NO. C -00 VC San Francisco,
More informationCourt Reporter: Felicia Rene Zabin, RPR, CCR 478 Federal Certified Realtime Reporter (702)
0 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA THE HON. KENT J. DAWSON, JUDGE PRESIDING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S-0--KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN,
More informationx. 9 f/k/a General Motors Corporation, et al., x
09-50026-reg Doc 10666 Filed 07/29/11 Entered 08/09/11 10:07:47 Main Document Pg 1 of Page 1 1 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 4 Case No. 09-50026-reg 5 - - - - - - - -
More information