21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand. 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided
|
|
- Molly Bailey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 1 CAUSE NUMBER IN RE : VU T RAN, IN THE DISTRICT COURT 3 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 PETITIONER 164th JUDICIAL DISTRICT ******************************************* * ***** 10 SEPTEMBER 30, ************************************************* On the 30th day of September, 2011, the 17 following proceedings came on to be heard in the 18 above-entitled and -numbered cause before the 19 Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Rogan, Judge Presiding, 20 held in Houston, Harris County, Texas. 21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided 23 Transcription
2 2 1 2 A P P E A R A N C E S 3 4 FOR THE PETITIONER: Mr. F. Eric Fryar, SBN Mr. Avneil J. Adler, SBN FRYAR LAW FIRM, P.C Texas Avenue, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas Telephone: Facsimile: FOR THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION: Mr. Edward B. Adams, Jr., SBN Mr. Peter C. Tipps, SBN FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P. Fulbright Tower 1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas Telephone: Facsimile:
3 1 P R 0 C E E D I N G S 2 THE COURT: All right. We are on the 3 3 record in Cause Number ; In Re: Vu Tran, 4 and if I could have appearance for the record, 5 Counsel. 6 MR. FRYAR: Eric Fryar, Avneil Adler, 7 Fryar Law Firm, for Petitioner. 8 MR. ADAMS: Edward B. "Teddy" Adams and 9 Peter Tipps for DTCC, one of the respondents. 10 THE COURT: All right. And this is a 11 motion to compel depos prior to suit, correct? 12 MR. FRYAR: I guess for permission to 13 take depos prior to suit. 14 THE COURT: Okay. All right. You can 15 give me the background if you want. I've read it. 16 I -- I guess my -- my major question at this point 17 is: The depos you're seeking to get are those 18 dep -- are all of those depos out of county? 19 MR. FRYAR: Yes. 20 MR. ADLER: They're all out of state. 21 THE COURT: They're all out of state. 22 Do I -- that's -- this is going to be my first 23 question to you. Do I have authority to order depos 24 of witnesses that are out of state when we don't even 25 have a case pending?
4 1 MR. ADLER: Well -- so actually 2 Respondent somewhat addressed that in his objections. 4 3 THE COURT: I thought of it before he 4 came to his objection, so that's 5 MR. ADLER: Right. 6 THE COURT: That's why I'm asking the 7 question. 8 MR. ADLER: Right. Okay. We 11, 9 Rule 201 does allow us to take out-of-state 10 depositions in the case that there is an action or proceeding in the state. Mr. Adams actually said an 12 action. In the beginning of Rule 201 it says proceeding in the state. 14 THE COURT: Okay. 15 MR. ADLER: You can certainly make the 16 argument that the Rule 202 petition is a proceeding 17 of some sort. It's an action. There's a cause 18 number. Actually, the case law Mr. Adams cites and 19 which just generally speaks about Rule 202 is about 20 I ' whether or not 1t's subject to removal for federal 21 diversity grounds. 22 So there really is no case law as far 23 as -- I mean, there is case law that discusses 24 Rule two -- as an ancillary proceeding, but there's 25 no case law on point as far as out-of-state
5 1 5 subpoenas, but I'd argue that it is a proceeding for 2 purposes of allowing letters rogatory. 3 MR. FRYAR: It -- it would seem to be 4 strange to set up to say we want to have in this 5 state a mechanism where people can take limited 6 discovery with the permission of the Court in order 7 to avoid unnecessary lawsuits and limit that to 8 discovery within the state unless, you know, it were 9 specifically stated in the rule THE COURT: Uh-huh. 11 MR. FRYAR: -- and it's not. The rule 12 allows us to have a proceeding, subject to permission 13 of the Court, to take limited discovery to determine 14 whether a cause of action exists and allows us to use 15 the rules of discovery to do that. 16 Rules of discovery clearly say -- I 17 mean, you can't order a deposition in New York, but 18 you issue letters rogatory, and we have to go follow 19 the New York procedure in order to secure a subpoena 20 there and get that. 21 THE COURT: Uh-huh. 22 MR. FRYAR: But, I mean, there is a 23 proceeding on file here. There is a cause number. 24 If you issue an order, then Rule 202 gives us the 25 right to go exercise, you know, whatever remedies
6 1 6 exist in New York, Florida, and California. 2 MR. ADLER: Right. Incidentally, we 3 also -- we styled the petition in a way that it's for 4 an anticipated suit. I actually looked into the case 5 law and -- or the -- rather, the statutes in 6 California and Florida, and they also have a similar 7 type of proceeding for obtaining testimony prior to a 8 lawsuit. 9 THE COURT: Okay. Response. 10 MR. ADAMS: Yes, Your Honor. And you want to just talk about whether they can do this at 12 all? THE COURT: Yeah. I mean, if I don't 14 have legal authority to do it, then I'm not going to 15 do it whether you respond to it or not. I'm-- 16 MR. ADAMS: Sure. 17 THE COURT: That's all I'm asking. 18 MR. ADAMS: We believe there is no 19 legal authority for out-of-state depositions. As the 20 Court knows, this is a very narrow area that allows 21 very limited, specific discovery. You don't get to 22 take discovery -- you don't get to do anything 23 besides take a deposition of someone in state. 24 As opposing counsel mentioned, there's 25 not a lot of case law on this, but that case law that
7 does exist talks about whether this is an action or 2 proceeding in the context of removal. You can remove 3 an action. So if there were truly an action, we 4 could've come down here and removed the case to 5 federal jurisdiction -- federal court of 6 jurisdiction -- existed. 7 The case that I looked at said "No. 8 You can't do that because this is not an action that 9 can be removed." And for the same reason it's not an 10 action letters rogatory rules of procedure that 11 allow you to, in this pre-suit context, reach over to 12 Florida or New York or California to take a 13 deposition of somebody who's a stranger to Texas. 14 But even if you could, Your Honor 15 THE COURT: Uh-huh. 16 MR. ADAMS: -- under that reason, you 17 shouldn't allow the deposition of Mr. Richards here 18 because although -- be talking about investigating a 19 claim, the motion they filed was for -- there are two 20 reasons you can take a deposition pre-suit, one, to 21 investigate a claim THE COURT: Uh-huh. 2 3 MR. ADAMS: and two, to prevent a 24 failure or delay of justice. At least as to 25 Mr. Richards, they went for the latter, and there is
8 1 8 no evidence at all anywhere in the papers they filed 2 that taking Mr. Richards' deposition now would any 3 way prevent a failure or delay of justice. He's not 4 sick. He's not going away. If they think they have 5 a lawsuit, they can file it and then go through the 6 procedure, take his deposition if they need it, but 7 there's nothing in the record to indicate that he 8 needs to be deposed now. They could've filed a 9 different motion asking to -- to investigate a claim. 10 We'd have a different issue. They didn't do that. 11 THE COURT: And I thought I read in 12 these papers that this is not y'all's first rodeo, 13 that there's already some litigation previously 14 around this. 15 MR. ADAMS: Let me give you a little 16 bit of background about this. 17 THE COURT: Okay. 18 MR. FRYAR: Not us. 19 THE COURT: Not you, but there's some 20 previous was it in your response MR. ADAMS: It was, Your Honor. 22 THE COURT: that I read that? Okay. 23 MR. ADAMS: There's a company called 24 CKKM Diamonds [sic]. 25 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
9 9 1 MR. ADAMS: It's a penny stock. The 2 people that ran that company were bad actors, issued 3 billions of shares improperly. There was lawsuits in 4 Nevada by the SEC against the operators of that. 5 Everyone in there either agreed to a consent judgment 6 against them or had summary judgment found against 7 them. While that proceeding was going on, the 8 company was folded up. Through that -- there were 9 various doc exchanges between that company -- other 10 companies as part of the winding-up process. 11 Meanwhile, in California -- and these 12 were some of the documents that were attached to the 13 petition. Mr. Hodges, one of the lawyers, one of the 14 people they want to depose, filed a lawsuit, a 15 putative class action against all the commissioners 16 of the SEC, and their theory is that there is a 17 secret multi-trillion-dollar fund that was set up. 18 That case was dismissed on the 19 pleadings, and one of the things they want to do is 20 depose the lawyer. The DTCC -- and I'm sorry for 21 this background. This is a little complicated. 22 Back in the olden times, when you 2 3 bought a share of stock, you got a stock certificate. 24 They sent it to you in the mail. That doesn't happen 25 anymore. What happens now is the company called the
10 1 10 DTCC that we represent, The Depository Trust & 2 Clearing Corporation, collects all those stock 3 certificates for pretty much everybody in the 4 country, and they put them in a vault, and they keep 5 electronic records of "Teddy Adams has a thousand 6 shares of Exxon stock" and I have it through Smith 7 Barney. Smith Barney will have an account with the 8 DTC that says "We have 5 million shares," and if they 9 need more shares they'll buy them from Morgan Stanley 10 and they'll make a record on the books. 11 Along with the functions of 12 storing/keeping records of who owns -- which 13 brokerage houses own stock, the DTCC also will -- if 14 you're going to make a dividend payment, instead of 15 ExxonMobil having to pass it out to everybody, 16 they'll give it to the DTCC, which, in turn, will 17 say, "All right. Smith Barney has a thousand shares. 18 They get $500,000. Merrill Lynch has 5,000 shares. 19 They get $25,000." Then Merrill Lynch and Smith 20 Barney will allocate it to their people. 21 Mr. Richards, who they want to depose, 22 is somebody who works for the DTCC 23 THE COURT: Okay. 24 MR. ADAMS: -- and he is part of this 25 other lawsuit and part of this morass.
11 Someone called him and recorded a 2 conversation with Mr. Richards in which he says "I 3 don't know anything about this. I don't know what 4 you're talking about. I've never seen anything, nor 5 have I told anyone I've ever seen anything." So this 6 is some big fishing expedition trying to find 7 something that may lead to some lawsuit about a $2.8 8 trillion secret fund that may or may not exist. 9 MR. FRYAR: Let me 10 THE COURT: Okay. 11 MR. FRYAR: -- get 12 THE COURT: Yeah. 13 MR. FRYAR: -- real practical. 14 THE COURT: Okay. 15 MR. FRYAR: Okay? First of all, we're 16 representing shareholders okay? -- shareholders 17 who bought stock that wasn't even authorized stock 18 okay? -- who lost their money. They're victims; no 19 question. There was a lot of litigation involving 20 the people that perpetrated the fraud, none which 21 went to a judgment that actually benefited the 22 shareholders. 23 THE COURT: Okay. 24 MR. FRYAR: Okay? There are -- you 25 know, I' 11 just say there are rumors -- okay? There
12 is -- I don't have any documentary evidence that 2 proves this, but there the shareholders had been 3 told by company insiders, some of whom are now d e ad, 4 that there were settlements done several years back 5 to set up funds for the benefit of the shareholders. 6 Mr. Hodges is one of the people we want 7 to depose. He instituted a lawsuit in California in 8 which he went -- you know, we got records of -- of 9 arguments before the Court in which he stated: I've 10 got evidence that this record that these trust 11 funds exist. DTCC is one of the owners of this. 12 Mr. -- who's the other guy? 13 MR. ADLER: Richards. 14 MR. FRYAR: -- Richards has been 15 contacted. The other guy' Fielding 16 MR. ADLER: Phillips. 17 MR. FRYAR: -- Phillips says he's 18 actually seen records that prove that this trust fund 19 exists and is where Mr. Hodges says. 20 THE COURT: Okay. 21 MR. FRYAR: So we have contact wait, wait. THE COURT: Is Phillips Is Phillips one -- wait, MR. FRYAR: Okay. THE COURT: Is this Phillips person
13 13 tt 1 somebody you wanted to depose? 2 MR. FRYAR: Yes. There were -- 3 MR. ADLER: Yeah. 4 MR. FRYAR: -- three people we want to 5 depose, Richards, Phillips, and Hodges. Basically 6 we've been hired by a bunch of these shareholders, 7 who say "If there's money out there that belongs to 8 us, we want to find it and we want to assert our 9 rights to it. We want to be paid. If there's not 10 we want to know that too. " You know? 11 THE COURT: Uh-huh. tt 12 MR. FRYAR: So, I mean, this is a 13 situation in which I could file a lawsuit, which 14 would be very expensive, and go through motions 15 practice on information and belief based on these 16 representations that have been made to our clients. 17 We'd be doing it in good faith. They think the money 18 is there. 19 THE COURT: Okay. 20 MR. FRYAR: Okay? But what we want to 21 do is use this rule for exactly what it's designed 22 for, which is to say, you know, "DTCC, if we're 23 crazy" -- and some people have said Mr. Hodges is tt 24 crazy. "If this fund doesn't exist, why don't you go 25 under oath and tell our shareholders it doesn't exist
14 14 tt 1 instead of file -- hiring Fulbright & Jaworski to 2 come in and file a paper the day before the hearing 3 to say 'Don't -- we don't want to go under oath to 4 say whether you have -- we have your money or not.'" 5 THE COURT: Uh-huh. 6 MR. FRYAR: Okay? What we're tying -- 7 trying to do is save resources, use the rule for what 8 it's designed for, and they're in here trying to 9 block our access to information. Well, all -- all 10 our people want to know is: Should we be suing 11 somebody? We don't want to file a lawsuit if there's tt 12 no basis. We've been told that we're crazy. We've 13 been told that this is a lie. We've also been told 14 that it's the truth. You know, "Attorney Fryar, can 15 you -- is there any way to find out for sure?" You 16 know? To which, my response is: There's Rule 2 0 2' 17 which allows us to take a deposition for exactly this 18 type of situation. 19 THE COURT: Right. But does it allow 20 you to take all of those dep -- it sounds like, from 21 the little bit you just told me, the main person you 22 need is this Phillips person, but MR. FRYAR: Well, Phillips and Hodges tt 24 definitely, and -- but, you know, what they're saying 2 5 is: We've seen the information -- we -- we have L
15 1 15 information that it's at the DTCC. We've seen a 2 record that it's at the DTCC. They're not, like 3 they're not associated with the DTCC. They're -- all 4 they can give us is hearsay. Why not go to the 5 source? I mean, give us one guy who's going to say 6 "This is true" or "This is false" under oath. 7 MR. ADLER: If I may add, just as far 8 as the DTCC is concerned, the phone transcript that 9 Mr. Adams was referring to earlier -- that's actually 10 a call from the CEO of the company. The rumors were 11 so prevalent that the CEO of a company actually 12 called Mr. Richards, hosted a transcript on their 13 company Web site THE COURT: Uh-huh. 15 MR. ADLER: -- and com -- and put up a 16 report about -- aside from the actual conversation 17 about the substance of this conversation. 18 It was obviously a very prevalent 19 rumor, and there were several people -- we weren't 20 we weren't able to find those people that had spoken 21 directly to Mr. Richards. There were several people 22 that had said -- to that effect, that 23 THE COURT: Uh-huh MR. ADLER: -- you know THE COURT: All right. Frankly, I ( 713)
16 16 tt 1 don't think you're saving any money to take three 2 depositions, regardless. I'm still kind of 3 questioning whether or not I even have the authority 4 to order these depositions. I'm-- 5 And this Phillips person is somebody 6 you represent as well? 7 MR. ADAMS: No, Your Honor. We 8 represent Morris --we represent DTC, who's Morris 9 Richards' employee [sic]. 10 THE COURT: Okay. 11 MR. ADAMS: Hodges and Phillips -- I 12 don't know anything about them. They -- tt 13 THE COURT: Yeah. 14 MR. ADAMS: They're on their own. 15 I think we I'd like to just re-focus 16 for a little bit. First of all, Rule there's 17 got to be some standard. It can't just be based on 18 rumors and hopes and dreams. The transcript that was 19 posted was unequivocal. He said he didn't know 20 anything about this, but we're getting a little bit 21 a -- far -- far afield because they asked to take a 22 deposition not to investigate a claim as to 23 Mr. Richards, but to prevent a failure or delay of tt 24 justice, a situation if somebody is sick, dying, 25 mentally infirm.
17 17 tt 1 THE COURT: Yeah. I mean, if that's 2 the reason -- that seems like the wrong reason. I'll 3 tell you that right now. If that's what you've 4 alleged, that's the absolute wrong reason because we 5 haven't even talked about that. 6 MR. FRYAR: Well, we don't want to sue 7 Mr. Richards individually, but he's a witness in a 8 lawsuit -- if this -- if the fund exists -- 9 THE COURT: Uh-huh. 10 MR. FRYAR: -- our people have a 11 lawsuit to assert their interest in the fund. 12 THE COURT: I understand tt 13 MR. FRYAR: Right. 14 THE COURT: exactly what you're 15 saying, but if the basis for your wanting a 16 deposition prior to suit is just because you want to 17 avoid him dying on you or something like that 18 that's not what we've discussed. What we've 19 discussed is investigating a claim. 20 If that's your basis, it sounds like 21 that should have been part of the original motion. 22 MR. FRYAR: I think we alleged that in 23 the alternative. Didn't we? tt 24 MR. ADLER: Well, the rule actually 25 says to perpetuate or obtain testimony, and I don't
18 18 tt 1 think that whether Mr. Richards -- 2 THE COURT: Do you have a copy of your 3 motion? 4 MR. ADLER: Yes. 5 THE COURT: Make my life easy. If all 6 it says is that you want to prevent it because he's 7 dying or he's got some other calamity, then it's 8 going to be denied. You're not barred from re-filing 9 it with the correct claim, but -- or you might just 10 save yourself some money, just file this thing. 11 MR. ADLER: Here's the paragraph that 12 talks about Richards' testimony. 13 THE COURT: Yeah. You got "may prevent 14 further delay." You MR. ADLER: I don't -- I don't think 16 the situation of whether or not he might die is 17 necessarily an only circumstance where --might 18 prevent a delay of justice. 19 THE COURT: And I think we're saying 20 the same things. The problem is that's not what you -- you alleged it as just trying to prevent delay 22 instead of alleging trying to prevent delay or and/or investigating the claim. 24 So, you know, if that's all you've got, 25 I'm going to deny as to Richards. Let me see
19 1 Phillips. It sounds like you just need this Phillips 2 person. I will tell you that MR. FRYAR: Well -- and Hodges is the 4 attorney who says that he has this evidence, and his 5 lawsuit was dismissed before it got to discovery or 6 anything on the merits, so we want to -- and he's 7 also a shareholder, so we want to find out what he's 8 got. 9 THE COURT: Okay. I'll let you depose 10 Hodges and Phillips. You're not deposing Richards. 11 Give me an order. There you go. 12 MR. ADAMS: Thank you, Your Honor. May 13 we be excused? 14 THE COURT: Yes. You're excused. 15 Do you have an order for me, or do you 16 want to submit one? 17 MR. ADLER: I have one here. 18 THE COURT: If you want to doctor it 19 and submit it to me, that's fine. 20 MR. ADLER: I have -- if you want to 21 just change the -- put the relevant names THE COURT: There. You fill in their 23 names so that I don't misspell them and then hand it 24 back to me. 25 MR. ADLER: Sure. Sure.
20 1 THE COURT: I'll sign it. Okay? 2 MR. ADAMS: May we submit an order as 20 3 to Richards? 4 THE COURT: Yes. Submit an order as to 5 Richards, and I'll sign off on it. 6 MR. ADAMS: Thank you. 7 THE COURT: Okay? Thank you. Have a 8 good weekend. 9 (End of proceedings.) L ~
21 21 1 THE STATE OF TEXAS 2 COUNTY OF HARRIS 3 4 I, Donna King, Official Court Reporter in and for the 164th Judicial District Court of Harris 5 County, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing contains a true and correct transcription 6 of all portions of evidence and other proceedings requested in writing by counsel for the parties to be 7 included in this volume of the Reporter's Record in the above-styled and -numbered cause, all of which 8 occurred in open court or in chambers and were reported by me I further certify that this Reporter's Record of the proceedings truly and correctly 11 reflects the exhibits, if any, admitted by the respective parties I further certify that the total cost for the preparation of this Reporter's Record is 14 $ and was paid/will be paid by WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND this, the 13th day of October, ~--l{l-;~ DONNA KING, Texas CS Expiration Date: 12/ 1/12 Official Court Reporter 164th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas 201 Caroline, 12th Floor Houston, Texas
The Florida Bar v. Bruce Edward Committe
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. Petitioner, ) vs. ) Cause No Defendant.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH MICHAEL RAETHER AND SAVANNA ) RAETHER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Cause No. --0-0 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) Vs. Defendant.
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING 0 TODD KIMSEY, Plaintiff, Vs. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Defendant. No. CV - PA REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF STATUS CONFERENCE
More information3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
1 4-7-10 Page 1 2 V I R G I N I A 3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 4 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 THIDA WIN, : 7 Plaintiff, : 8 versus, : GV09022748-00 9 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT
More informationCase 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C
Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25 Exhibit C Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 2 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA
More information0001 1 THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND 2 FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO.: 16-2008-CA-012971 DIVISION: CV:G 4 5 GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, ) ) 6 Plaintiff, ) ) 7 vs. ) ) 8 CARRIE GASQUE,
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, ) ) 6 PLAINTIFF, ) ) 7 VS. ) NO. 1381216 ) 8 WILLIAM
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON AT EUGENE
Michael R. Seidl, OSB No. 833190 mseidl@landye-bennett.com Jennifer L. Gates, OSB No. 050578 jgates@landye-bennett.com Landye Bennett Blumstein, LLP 1300 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 3500 Portland, Oregon 97201
More informationSTATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CV WILLIAM TURNER, Plaintiff, vs.
0 0 STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT WILLIAM TURNER, vs. Plaintiff, CV-0- ROZELLA BRANSFORD, et al., Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS On the th day of November 0, at
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch 9
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch FILED 0-0-1 CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY, WI 1CV000 AMY LYNN PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 1 CV CITY OF MADISON, et al., Defendants.
More informationCase 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# Exhibit D
Case 3:15-cv-00357-HEH-RCY Document 139-4 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 1828 Exhibit D Case 3:15-cv-00357-HEH-RCY Document 139-4 Filed 02/05/16 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 1829 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationThe Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 THE NORTHEAST OHIO ) 4 COALITION FOR THE ) HOMELESS, ET AL., ) 5 ) Plaintiffs, ) 6 ) vs. ) Case No. C2-06-896 7 ) JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 6. MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) ) vs. KRIS KOBACK, KANSAS SECRETARY ) OF STATE, ) Defendant.) ) Case No. CV0 ) TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE:. Case No. 0-.. SHARON DIANE HILL,.. USX Tower - th Floor. 00 Grant Street. Pittsburgh, PA Debtor,.. December 0, 00................
More informationPage 5 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 THE COURT: All we have left is Number 5 and 3 then Mr. Stopa's. Are you ready to proceed? 4 MR. SPANOLIOS: Your Honor
Page 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 3 4 5 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs CASE NO: 2009-CA-002668 8 TONY ROBINSON and DEBRA ROBINSON,
More informationGLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) VS. ) February 2, ) ) Defendants. ) ) TAMERLANE GLOBAL SERVICES, et al.,) MOTIONS HEARING
Case :-cv-0-gbl-idd Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil
More informationHAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPT 24 HON. ROBERT L. HESS, JUDGE BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, ET AL, PLAINTIFF, VS MARY CUMMINS, DEFENDANT. CASE NO.: BS140207 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationAmendments To Uniform Guidelines For Taxation of Costs
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAVAPAI 0 PRESCOTT SPORTSMANS CLUB, by and) through Board of Directors, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MARK SMITH; TIM MASON; WILLIAM
More information5 v. 11 Cv (JSR) 6 SONAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., 7 Defendants x 9 February 17, :00 p.m.
Case 1:11-cv-09665-JSR Document 20 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 20 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------x 3 SIDNEY GORDON, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 11 Cv.
More informationONTARIO, INC., Appellant, Respondent
0 COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------- ONTARIO, INC., -against- Appellant, SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION, Respondent. ---------------------------------------- Before: No.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CI-19 UCN: CA015815XXCICI
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-015815-CI-19 UCN: 522008CA015815XXCICI INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Successor in Interest to INDYMAC BANK,
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE CASE OF CLARKE V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WHAT DID I SAY, CLARKE V. UNITED STATES? >> YEAH.
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE CASE OF CLARKE V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WHAT DID I SAY, CLARKE V. UNITED STATES? >> YEAH. >> YOU MAY PROCEED WHEN YOU'RE READY, COUNSEL. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHIEF
More informationWhat were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?
Quiz name: Make Your Case Debrief Activity (1-27-2016) Date: 01/27/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 8 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What were the final scores
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
More informationCASE NO.: CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February 5, 2013
CASE NO.: 0--00-CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February, 0 0 0 REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME OF VOLUMES TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. DC--0-A DALLAS, TEXAS CONSUMER SERVICE ALLIANCE ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT CE-ll HON. MICHAEL I. LEVANAS, JUDGE IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ISADORE ROSENBERG, NO. BP109162 DECEASED. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA XXXX MB
9708 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2008 CA 040969XXXX MB THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR CHASEFLEX TRUST SERIES 2007-3,
More informationCONSIDERATION OF SENATE BILL 14 1/25/2011. through and telling them, "Any Mexican-American citizen
Case :-cv-00-rmc-dst-rlw :-cv-00 Document 0-0 Document Filed in TXSD Filed on 0// // Page of of CONSIDERATION OF SENATE BILL // 0 voting at election time; going through the barrios in Corpus Christi and
More informationMEETING OF THE OHIO BALLOT BOARD
MEETING OF THE OHIO BALLOT BOARD 1 - - - MEETING of the Ohio Ballot Board, at the Ohio Statehouse, Finan Finance Hearing Room, 1 Capitol Square, Columbus, Ohio, called at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December
More information1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION. 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 vs. CASE NO. C2-06-896 8 JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More information18 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT 2 OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO.: 2009 CA 033952 4 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS 5 TRUSTEE UNDER POOLING AND
More informationCase 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 323 EXHIBIT 2
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 136-4 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 323 EXHIBIT 2 Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 136-4 Filed 05/21/12 Page 2 of 323 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
More informationTranscript of Bryan Michael Pagliano
Transcript of Bryan Michael Pagliano Date: June 22, 2016 Case: Judicial Watch, Inc. -v- U.S. Department of State Planet Depos, LLC Phone: 888-433-3767 Fax: 888-503-3767 Email: transcripts@planetdepos.com
More informationKYLEEN CANE - 12/18/06 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 DAVID KAGEL, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) 5 ) vs. ) 6 ) JAN WALLACE, ) CASE NO.: 7 ) CV 06-3357 R (SSx) Defendant. ) 8 ) ) 9 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RENFROW, Defendant.... APPEARANCES: For the Plaintiff: For the Defendant: Court Reporter: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Docket No. -0-CM
More information2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI 2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC 88038 ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. ) 7 8 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT 61 BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE 0 DAVID RADEL, ) ) Plaintiff, )No. -0-000-CU-FR-CTL ) vs. ) ) RANCHO CIELO
More informationCase 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document 335 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 68
Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document Filed 0// Page of Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document Filed 0// Page of. I have reviewed the Affidavit of John P. Rohner (the Rohner Affidavit ), filed with the Court on August,
More informationPh Fax Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 50 2008 CA 028558 XXXX MB DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS
More informationKRESSE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 3 CASE NO. 09-49079CA22 4 5 WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, F.S.D. F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK,
More information5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 10 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 06QS2 5 Plaintiff,
More information5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2010 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 2006QS2 5 Plaintiff,
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO.
1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO. 304 5 ---ooo--- 6 COORDINATION PROCEEDING ) SPECIAL TITLE [Rule 1550(b)] ) 7 )
More informationThe Due Process Advocate
The Due Process Advocate No Person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law - Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution Vol. 15 No. 2 www.dueprocessadvocate.com
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. The above-entitled matter came on for oral
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 0 AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, v. Appellant, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., Appellees.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ----------------------------------------------------------- ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. PETTERS COMPANY, INC., () and PETTERS GROUP WORLDWIDE,
More informationSiemens' Bribery Scandal Peter Solmssen
TRACE International Podcast Siemens' Bribery Scandal Peter Solmssen [00:00:07] On today's podcast, I'm speaking with a lawyer with extraordinary corporate and compliance experience, including as General
More information>> OUR NEXT CASE OF THE DAY IS DEBRA LAFAVE VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. I'M JULIUS AULISIO.
>> OUR NEXT CASE OF THE DAY IS DEBRA LAFAVE VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. I'M JULIUS AULISIO. I REPRESENT DEBRA LAFAVE THE PETITIONER IN THIS CASE. WE'RE HERE
More informationPage 1. 10:10 a.m. Veritext Legal Solutions
1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., etc. 4 Plaintiff, 5 vs. Case No. CV-12-789401 6 EDGEWATER REALTY, LLC, et al. 7 Defendant. 8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More informationCase 1:11-cv LAK Document Filed 02/06/11 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:11-cv-00691-LAK Document 31-21 Filed 02/06/11 Page 1 of 35 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION Page 1 3 In re: Application of ) CHEVRON
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARY CUMMINS Defendant W. 9th St. #110-10 Los Angeles, CA 9001 In Pro Per Telephone: (10-0 Email: mmmaryinla@aol.com SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, AMANDA LOLLAR
More informationLARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PAGES 1-14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. LEGGE, JUDGE LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C 99-2506 CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART X RELIABLE ABSTRACT CO.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2016 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 653850/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 211 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART 61 ----------------------------
More informationCase4:10-cv SBA Document81 Filed05/31/11 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-SBA Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, VS. PLAINTIFF, SANDISK CORPORATION, ET AL,
More informationCase 2:08-cv AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1
Case 2:08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 3 HONORABLE A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT
More informationThis is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of
This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of the Pooling and Servicing agreement and the use of the
More informationPage 1. Veritext Chicago Reporting Company
Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 3 EASTERN DIVISION 4 JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA ) 5 JOSE LOPEZ, ) 6 Plaintiffs, ) 7 vs. ) No. 1:11-cv-05452 8 JANET
More informationCase 2:03-cv DGC Document 141 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 32
Exhibit A to the Motion to Exclude Testimony of Phillip Esplin Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 141 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 32 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4 Cheryl Allred,
More informationJames M. Maloney. Attorney at Law Proctor in Admiralty. P.O. Box Bayview Avenue Port Washington, NY April 7, 2014
admitted to practice in New York; New Jersey; United States Supreme Court; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the District of Connecticut, Northern District
More informationin a two-phase trial or can we handle it all together as far as determining if the conditions are violated and then
Silvia Villalobos - July, Direct Examination by Ms. Dozier 0 in a two-phase trial or can we handle it all together as far as determining if the conditions are violated and then punishment at the same time
More informationAGREN BLANDO COURT REPORTING & VIDEO INC 1
1 BEFORE SPECIAL MASTER BARTON H. THOMPSON, JR. HEARING RE: MONTANA'S RIGHT TO V(B) CLAIMS September 30, 2011 IN THE MATTER OF MONTANA VS. WYOMING AND NORTH DAKOTA NO. 220137 ORG The above-entitled matter
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/17/2018 INDEX NO / :15 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 246 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/17/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART: 23 -------------------------------------------------------X YOUSSOUF DEMBELE a/k/a MALAHA SALIK, -against- Plaintiff, ACTION
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2006 9
More information13 A P P E A R A N C E S :
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/0/ :0 AM INDEX NO. / SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY : CIVIL TERM : PART --------------------------------------------x ACCESS INDUSTRIES I INC. l -
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION BASHE ABDI YOUSUF, et al.,. Civil Action No. :0cv0. Plaintiffs,.. vs.. Alexandria, Virginia. April, 00 MOHAMED ALI
More informationTRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONIE M. BRINKEMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Pages 1-15)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH Civil Action No :0cv AL SHIMARI, et al, Plaintiffs, vs Alexandria, Virginia June, 0 CACI PREMIER
More informationCase 2:81-cv JMV-JBC Document 218 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 49 PageID: 7634
Case 2:81-cv-03876-JMV-JBC Document 218 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 49 PageID: 7634 1 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 2 CIVIL ACTION NO. 81-3876 (JMV) 3 - - - - - - - - -
More information1 FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS PUBLIC MEETING MAY 28, (Commencing at 11:02 a.m.
1 1 FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 4 5 6 7 8 FILE NO. 130050 9 10 11 12 13 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS PUBLIC MEETING MAY 28, 2013 (Commencing at 11:02 a.m.) 14 15 16
More informationKenneth Friedman, M.D. v. Heart Institute of Port St. Lucie, Inc.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al.
0 0 COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------- ARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., -against- Appellant, CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al. Respondents. ----------------------------------------
More information1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 SPOKEO, INC., : 4 Petitioner : No v. : 6 THOMAS ROBINS. : 7 x. 8 Washington, D.C.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 2 x 3 SPOKEO, INC., : 4 Petitioner : No. 13 1339 5 v. : 6 THOMAS ROBINS. : 7 x 8 Washington, D.C. 9 Monday, November 2, 2015 10 11 The above entitled matter
More informationArmstrong & Okey, Inc., Columbus, Ohio (614)
Case: 2:14-cv-00404-PCE-NMK Doc #: 64-4 Filed: 08/07/14 Page: 1 of 41 PAGEID #: 4277 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION - - - Ohio State Conference of : the
More informationCase 3:11-cv REP Document 132 Filed 01/28/12 Page 1 of 153 PageID# 2426 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case :-cv-00-rep Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION 0 -------------------------------------- : GILBERT JAMES :
More informationNOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND POSSIBLE EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND POSSIBLE EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION Location: 1616 West Adams, Suite 110 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Date: Friday, June 29, 2018
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2018
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COONTY OF NEW YORK -x STEPHEN FREIDUS, Individually and derivatively as a General Partner on behalf of 62 WEST 45TH STREET ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, -against- Index
More informationOctober 2, (Lord's Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag) Bill, if we could have roll call, please. Treasurer, George Ebling?
PROCEEDINGS Lordstown Village Council Regular Meeting (WHEREAS, the regular meeting before the Lordstown Village Council commenced on, at 6:10 p.m. and proceedings were as follows:) (Lord's Prayer and
More informationLilliana Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCITY OF TOLLESON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ACTION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 22, :00 P.M.
CITY OF TOLLESON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ACTION MINUTES CALL TO ORDER TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018 5:00 P.M. Chair Camacho called the Tolleson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting to order at 5:00
More information--8. Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/17/14 Page 1 of 216 JA_ KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 725-23 Filed in TXSD on 11/17/14 Page 1 of 216 19 1 SEN. FRASER votes --5 --7 to steal the 2 election in a democratic primary in Dallas Texas --8 3 and he brought that forward.
More information1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE090039 3 4 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR SASCO 05-WF4, 5 Plaintiff(s), 6 vs.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DR. SANG-HOON AHN, DR. LAURENCE ) BOGGELN, DR. GEORGE DELGADO, ) DR. PHIL DREISBACH, DR. VINCENT ) FORTANASCE, DR. VINCENT NGUYEN, ) and AMERICAN
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on : behalf of all others similarly : situated, : : Plaintiff, : :
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on : behalf of all others similarly : situated, : : Plaintiff, : : v BRIAN J. DRISCOLL, ROBERT J. : ZOLLARS, EDWARD A.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy # (KG)...
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy #07-11337 (KG)... Wilmington, DE December 5, 2007 10:00 a.m. TRANSCRIPT OF
More information1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 12-CV MGC. Plaintiff, June 11, vs.
Case 1:12-cv-21799-MGC Document 115 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 12-CV-21799-MGC 3 4 JERRY ROBIN REYES, 5 vs. Plaintiff,
More informationModule 2 Legal Infrastructure
Module 2 Legal Infrastructure Part 3 Legal Infrastructure at Work Insights from Current Evidence.MP4 Media Duration: 21:11 Slide 1 Our final part looks at legal infrastructure at work. We looked at a bunch
More informationAreeq Chowdhury: Yeah, could you speak a little bit louder? I just didn't hear the last part of that question.
So, what do you say to the fact that France dropped the ability to vote online, due to fears of cyber interference, and the 2014 report by Michigan University and Open Rights Group found that Estonia's
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No.
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: MARCH 17,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) VS. ) June 15, ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) Defendant. ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. - ) VS. ) June, ) ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) ) Defendant.
More informationTHE NEXT PHASE IS SHAHLA RABIE VS. PALACE RESORTS. THE PLAINTIFF SELECTION IS ONLY GOING TO BE CHALLENGED WHEN THE DEFENDANT CAN SHOW THAT THE
THE NEXT PHASE IS SHAHLA RABIE VS. PALACE RESORTS. THE PLAINTIFF SELECTION IS ONLY GOING TO BE CHALLENGED WHEN THE DEFENDANT CAN SHOW THAT THE PRIVATE INTEREST OF THE DEFENDANT IS INTERESTED IN PROTECTING
More information1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: 3 4 Plaintiff, 5 -vs- 6 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY a municipal corporation 7 and political subdivision of the State
More informationPage 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE
Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 09 001184 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, Plaintiff, -vs- MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
More informationCase 4:14-cr DLH Document 44 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cr-0000-dlh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION United States of America, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) File No. :-mj-0 ) James
More informationPage 1. VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE. Defendant(s). VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE Counterclaimants and Third Party Plaintiffs, vs.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION - ATLANTIC COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-10209-08 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-AB3 Plaintiff(s),
More informationRuth Wasem on Immigration: Part 2
Ruth Wasem on Immigration: Part 2 Angela Evans: Welcome to Policy on Purpose. My name is Angela Evans, and I'm the Dean of the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin. My guest
More informationAppellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/08/2016 Page: 1. Re: Supplemental Authority in Fish, et al. v. Kobach, Case No.
Appellate Case: - Document: 0 Date Filed: 0/0/0 Page: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION NATIONAL OFFICE BROAD STREET, TH FL. NEW YORK, NY 00-00 T/.. F/-- WWW.ACLU.ORG Elisabeth Shumaker Clerk of
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS SS. COUNTY OF COOK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Case No. 1 CR -01 Plaintiff, VS RYNE SANHAMEL,
More informationScott A. Walter, 1/13/2010 Page: 1
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 AT SEATTLE Scott A. Walter, 1/13/2010 Page: 1 Page 1 4 5 In Re: Case No. 07-13346-KAO 6 Steven C. Bateman and 7 Virginia T. Lee, 8 Debtors.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT 85 HON. JAMES C. CHALFANT, JUDGE ) CASE NO: BS145904
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT HON. JAMES C. CHALFANT, JUDGE JOHN RANDO, ET AL., ) ) PETITIONERS, ) ) VS. KAMALA HARRIS, ET AL., ) ) RESPONDENTS. ) )
More informationCase 3:13-cv DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F
Case 3:13-cv-00207-DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F Case 3:13-cv-00207-DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #782 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More information