The Journey So Far - Africa s Road to Busan and Beyond. Africa Post-Busan Technical Working Group March 2012, Addis Ababa

Transcription

1 The Journey So Far - Africa s Road to Busan and Beyond Africa Post-Busan Technical Working Group March 2012, Addis Ababa

2 Africa s preparations for Busan A two-year preparation process Three AUC/NEPAD Agency regional multi-stakeholder consultations on Development Effectiveness: the First Africa Regional Meeting (ARM) with the Government of South Africa in Pretoria (March 2010); The Second ARM with the African Development Bank (AfDB) in Tunis, (November 2010) and The Third ARM in Addis Ababa (September 2011), coordinated under the Africa Platform for Development Effectiveness (APDev) launched in March 2011.

3 Africa s preparations for Busan (2) The First Africa Regional Meeting (ARM) with the Government of South Africa in Pretoria (March 2010); call for the establishment of a coordinating platform under the custodianship of the AU the foundation for Africa s new DE approach The Second ARM with the African Development Bank (AfDB) in Tunis, (November 2010) advanced the DE agenda and incorporated the regional dimension, the central role of the private sector and innovative financing mechanisms in moving beyond aid The Third ARM in Addis Ababa (September 2011), coordinated under the Africa Platform for Development Effectiveness (APDev) launched in March the African Consensus and Position for the HLF IV in Busan was issued signifying Africa s bold and unified stand for DE based on a global partnership framed on inclusive development cooperation agenda.

4 Africa s Development Effectiveness agenda Overall: emphasis on the role of capacity development as critical in promoting African ownership and leadership of aid management processes in order to realize development effectiveness in Africa Key message for Busan (and beyond): to make development more effective by optimizing the management and utilization of domestic and external policies, resources and processes.

5 Africa at the 4 th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness Under APDev, AUC/NEPAD Agency championed Development Effectiveness (AE/SSC/CD) Coordinated and strong African voice: APDev events and African Sherpas Development Effectiveness prioritized in the international development discourse Busan Partnership document: a fair reflection of Africa s interests and priorities, but some key areas for improvement

6 The Post-Busan process Paragraphs 35 and 36 of the Busan Partnership document Mandate of the WP-EFF extended to June 2012 Post-Busan Interim Group (PBIG) of to deliver final agreement and decision on the future structure, governance and monitoring of the Global Partnership within the extended WP-EFF in June Building Block initiatives New international agreements Effective institutions

7 Africa and the Post-Busan Agenda Determined to build on momentum 18 th AU Summit (January 2012) requested AUC and NEPAD Agency: to actively take forward the post-busan agenda through inclusive and Africa-wide consultations in shaping the new Global Partnership; to ensure that Africa voice and representation are taken into account in the emerging global partnership arrangements. Two-pronged strategy: Ministerial Working Group to drive Africa s interests in the post- Busan process Africa Post-Busan Technical Working Group 7

8 African supporters of the Building Block initiatives (1) Building block Fragile States Sponsors Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Guinea Bissau, Guinea, Haiti, Ireland, Japan, Liberia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Sudan, Spain*, Sweden, Switzerland, Timor-Leste, Togo, United Kingdom, United States, African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Union, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, UN Development Group, World Bank South-South Cooperation ACP Group of States, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Germany, Ghana, Honduras, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malawi, Mexico, Spain, the European Union, the Asian Development Bank, the Caribbean Community Secretariat, the Inter-American Development Bank, La Francophonie, the Organization of American States, the New Partnership for Africa s Development, the Pacific Islands Forum, the Pan-American Health Organization, the United Nations Development Programme, the World Bank, Zambia

9 African supporters of the Building Block initiatives (2) Building block Private Sector Sponsors Austria, Belgium, Business Call to Action, Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD, Cambodia, Confederation of Danish Industry, Conseil Français des Investisseurs en Afrique, Czech Republic, Denmark, European Development Finance Institutions (EDFI), European International Contractors, Finland, France, GBCHealth, Germany, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, International Business Leaders Forum, International Finance Corporation, Japan, Korea, Malawi, Mali, Netherlands, Portuguese Association for Economic Development and Cooperation, Sanofi, Pan African Business Coalition on HIV and Health, Sweden, Switzerland, United Nations Global Compact, United States, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Zambia Climate finance Australia, Bangladesh, Belgium, Better Aid, Bolivia, Cambodia, Cameroon, Denmark, European Commission, Fiji, Honduras, Indonesia, Kenya, Korea, Lesotho, Malawi, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Pacific Island Secretariat, Peru, Samoa, Switzerland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe

10 African supporters of the Building Block initiatives (3) Building block Sponsors Transparency Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Colombia, the Collaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative (CABRI), Denmark, Development Initiatives, the European Commission, Indonesia, International Budget Partnership, Malawi, Mali, Moldova, Peru, Publish What You Fund, Rwanda, Sweden, Tanzania, Transparency International, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States, the World Bank and IATI-endoring countries and CSOs (around 40 countries and institutions) Effective Institutions Cambodia, Canada, Consorcio Andino, Corporacion PBA, Denmark, France, Ghana, Ireland, Korea, Malawi, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States, Zambia, ACBF, Africa Union/NEPAD, Asian Development Bank, CARICOM, CABRI, European Commission, IFAC, INTOSAI, LenCD, OECD, UNDP, World Bank, World Bank Institute

11 African supporters of the Building Block initiatives (4) Building block Sponsors Results and Mutual Accountability Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Canada, Denmark, European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, International Fund for Agricultural Development, Islamic Development Bank, Honduras, Iceland, Ireland, Madagascar, Moldova, Mozambique, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Rwanda, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tanzania, Togo, United Kingdom, United States of America, Zambia Managing Diversity and Reducing Fragmentation Austria, Bangladesh, Better Aid, Cameroon, Estonia, European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Global Programs Learning Group, Honduras, Madagascar, Malawi, Moldova, Netherlands, Poland, Peru, Rwanda, Sweden, Tuvalu, Uganda, Zambia the United Nations Development Group is contributing the Delivering as One approach