Report on Arrests for Burglary in California, 1998

Transcription

1 Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents Report on Arrests for Burglary in California, 1998 Office of the Attorney General Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Office of the Attorney General, "Report on Arrests for Burglary in California, 1998" (1999). California Agencies. Paper This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact

2 Report on Arrests for Burglary in California, STATE DEPOSITORY. LAW LIBRARY SEP GOLPBN GATB liniverslty ~ KFC e 22.J250. R5 1 v. 1 no. l State of Callfomla Office of the Attomey General Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis CRIMINAL.JUSTICE STATISTICS CENTER REPORT SERID Volume 1, Number 3 August 1999

3 KFC22. J250.R5 Report on arrests for burglary in California t Report on Arrests for Burglary in California, 1998 Bill Lockyer, Attorney General California Department of Justice Division of Criminal Justice Information Services Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis Criminal Justice Statistics Center ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE INTERNET>-

4 STATE DEPOSITORY LAW LIBRARY SEP GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY Report on Arrests for Burglar.y In California, 1998 DO NOT REMOVE FROM A \AI V. B U f \ -\ GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY l J D ~) A R y "

5 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bill Lockyer, Attorney General DMSION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICES Nick Dedier, Director \ BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS Doug Smith, Chief Mike Acosta, Assistant Chief CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS CENTER Steve Galeria, Manager STATISTICAL DATA CENTER Roy V. Lewis, Ph.D., Manager PREPARED BY Marie K. Herbert, Research Analyst ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Ann Kelly, Research Analyst Statistical Analysis Center John Dumbauld, Manager LaTanya Henley, Crime Studies Technician The role of the Criminal Justice Statistics Center is: To collect, analyze, and report statistical data, which provide valid measures of crime and the criminal justice process; To examine these data on an ongoing basis to better describe crime and the criminal justice system; To promote the responsible presentation and use of crime statistics. Criminal Justice Statistics Center 4949 Broadway P.O. Box Sacramento, CA

6 CONTENTS Highlights Introduction Burglary Arrests by Gender Burglary Arrests by Race Burglary Arrests by Age Appendices Burglary Arrests Tables Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Year, Number and Percent of Arrests by Gender, Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Gender, 1988 & 1998 Number and Percent of Arrests by Race/Ethnic Group, Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Race/Ethnic Group, 1988 & Number and Percent of Arrests by Age Group, Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Age Group, 1988 & Number of Arrests by Age Group, Figures Burglary Arrests Number of Arrests by Year, Rate per 100,000 Population by Gender, Percent of Total Arrests by Race/Ethnic Group, 1988 & Percent of Total Arrests by Age Group, 1988 & Appendices Burglary Arrests A Number of Arrests and Percent Change by Gender, Race and Age Group, 1988 & B Arrest Rate per 100,000 and Percent Change by Gender, Race and Age Group, 1988 & C Number of Arrests by County, D Number of Arrests by Cities with Population over 100,000, E Number of Arrests by County and Age Category, Population Estimates F By Gender, Race/Ethnic Group, and Age Group, 1988 &

7 HIGHLIGHTS \ + From 1988 to 1998, the number of burglary arrests declined 27.1 percentfrom 76,270 in 1988 to 55,595 in (Table 1 and 8) + The burglary arrest rate per 100, 000 total population declined 34 percentfrom in 1988 to in (Tables 1,3,5 & 7) + From 1997 to 1998, burglary arrests declined 6.0 percent, from 59,148 to 55,595. (Table 1) + From 1988 to 1998, the number of males arrested for burglary declinedfrom 65,266 in 1988 to 44,039 in In contrast, the number of females arrested increased from 11,004 in 1988 to 11,556 in (Table 2) 4

8 I + More men were arrested than women for burglary each year (79.2 percent of the total in 1998); however, the percentage of women arrested increased from 14.4 percent of the total in 1988 to 20.8 percent of the total in (Table 2) + From 1988 to 1998, the burglary arrest rate declined for all four race/ethnic groups: White, Hispanic, Black and Other. Blacks declined the most (42. 7%), from arrests per 100,000 in 1988 to arrests per 100,000 in (Table 5) + When age groups were combined, the data show that the percentage of year olds arrested for burglary decreased from 65.3 percent of the total in 1988 to in 1998, while the percentage of juveniles plus individuals over 40 arrested for burglary increased from 34.6 percent of the total in 1988 to 45.4 in (Table 7 and Figure 4) 5

9 Report on Arrests for Burglary in California, 1998 Introduction This report contains information about persons arrested for the crime of burglary. The purpose of this report is to provide policy makers and the public with accurate and complete criminal statistical information by organizing and displaying 1998 arrest data and multi-year arrest data for burglary. Statewide totals of burglary arrests are displayed by gender, race, and age. Data by county and by cities with population over 1 00,000 are also available in the Appendices. \ The number of reported burglary crimes declined 34 percent from 407,555 in 1988 to 268,847 in The number of burglary arrests and the rate per 100,000 also declined steadily over the last 10 years (see Table 1 ). The reasons for the decline are not readily known and this report does not speculate on the causal factors that may be responsible because there is no way to definitively measure the impact of those factors. However, it is suspected that the underlying factors include, but are not limited to demographics, increased law enforcement personnel, crime prevention techniques such as neighborhood watch programs and burglar alarm systems, community oriented policing and stricter penalties such as the 11 three-strikes 11 law. Data concerning the number and nature of burglary arrests in the state of California are collected through the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. Local city police departments, county sheriff offices, the California Highway Patrol, and other law enforcement agencies report on a monthly basis. ARRESTSFORBURGLARY Arrests for violations of the following California Penal Code Sections are the basis for this report: Burglary - 459, 460, and 461 Burglary is defined as the unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or a theft. Looting during emergency (a) Burglary with acetylene torch, etc., or explosives Attempted burglary - 664/459, and 664/460 The arrest totals shown should not be interpreted as the actual number of individuals arrested for burglary offenses because it is possible that some individuals may have been arrested for burglary on more than one occasion. 1 Crime data are available from the Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Statistics Center. 6

10 There were 76,270 burglary arrests in With the exception of 1989 and 1992, years in which burglary arrests peaked, arrests declined to 55,595 in The rate of arrests decreased from per 100,000 total population in 1988 to per 100,000 total population in (Table 1 & Figure 1) Total Year population ,060, ,771, ,557, ,646, ,300, ,742, ,140, b 32,063, ,383, ,957,000 TABLE 1 BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Year Burglary Percent Rate per Percent change Rate per arrests change from 100,000 total in rate from 100,000 reported previous year population 2 previous year at risk 3 76, , , , , , , , , , Percent change in rate from previous year ,494,000 55, Population est1mates were prov1ded by the Demographic Research Umt, Cahforn1a Department offmance. 2 Rates are based on annual total population estimates provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. 3 Rates are based on the population at risk (persons ages I 0-69) for each year and 1991 data do not include arrests for San Bernardino PD. b 1995 data does not include arrests for Oakland PO or March-December arrests for Bakersfield PD. FIGURE 1 BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number of Arrests by Year ,000 80,000 70,000 :I :tl 60,000.. <... 50,000 0 Cll 40,000.ct E :::1 z 30,000 20,000 10, Year 7

11 Burglazy Arrests by Gender Approximately 83 percent of the burglary arrests during the 10-year period of were arrests of males. However, in the 10-year period, arrests of males for burglary, as a percent of the total, declined, while arrests of females for burglary, as a percent of the total, increased. In 1988 women accounted for 14.4 percent of the arrests, which increased to 20.8 percent in (Table 2) The male arrest rate declined 43.1 percent from per 100,000 in 1988 to per 100,000 in However, the female arrest rate declined only 10.6 percent from 77.4 per 100,000 in 1988 to 69.2 per 100,000 in (Table 3 & Figure 2) TABLE2 BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number and Percent of Arrests by Gender Year Male Female Number Percent Number Percent Total " " b ,266 69,137 67,789 66,197 67,471 62,037 57,023 51,872 50,926 47,127 44, ,004 12,205 12,122 11,792 12,874 12,592 12,418 12,109 11,544 12,021 11, ,270 81,342 79,911 77,989 80,345 74,629 69,441 63,981 62,470 59,148 55, and 1991 data do not include arrests for San Bernardino PD. b 1995 data docs not include arrests for Oakland PD or March-December arrests for Bakersfield PD. 8

12 Burg lazy Arrests by Gender (continued) TABLE3 BURGLARY ARRESTS,1988 & 1998 Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Gender Percent Percent Number Percent Percent Number Percent change in Gender of of oftota1 of of of total rate population arrests arrests Rate population arrests arrests Rate Total , , Male , , Female , , Notes: Rates arc based on annual population estimates provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. Rates were calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the respective population, then multiplied by I 00,000. Percentages may not add to due to independent rounding. FIGURE2 BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Rate per 100,000 Population by Gender e = ;.! ::: Cl. e 300.0,:t., Q Q ~ Q Q , Cl.., ell :( Male Gender Female [

13 Bundary Arrests by Race From 1988 to 1998 the rate of arrest per 100,000 total population declined for all four of the race/ethnic groups:white, Hispanic, Black and Other. However, while the number of arrrests declined for Whites, Blacks and Hispanics, the number of arrests of Others increased from 3,758 in 1988 to 4,243 in (Tables 4 & 5) As a percentage of the total arrests, the race/ethnic groups of White and Black decreased while the race/ethnic groups of Hispanic and Other increased. These changes are similar to the shifts in population among the race/ethnic groups. (Table 5 & Figure 3) Year White TABLE4 BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number and Percent of Arrests by Race/Ethnic Group Hispanic Black Other Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent , , , , , I 30, , , , , , , , , , " 27, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , b 23, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 1991 data do not include arrests for San Bernardino PD. b 1995 data does not include arrests for Oakland PO or March-December arrests for Bakersfield PD. Total 10

14 Burglary Arrests by Race (continued) TABLES BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Race/Ethnic Group Percent Race/ Percent Number Percent Percent Number Percent change in ethnic of of of total of of of total rate group population arrests arrests Rate population arrests arrests Rate Totai , , White , , Hispanic , , Black , , Other 9.4 3, , Notes: Rates are based on annual population estimates provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. Rates were calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the respective population, then multiplied by 100,000. Percentages may not add to due to independent rounding. FIGURE 3 BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Percent of Total Arrests by Race/Ethnic Group "' "' ~... < s Cl E-o... Cl... ~ ~ lj... ~ A White Hispanic Black Other Race/Ethnic Group.1988 [

15 From 1988 to 1998 the total nwnber ofburglary arrests for adults and juveniles declined. {Table 6) \ Adults made up 64.2 percent of the burglary arrests in 1998, a decline from 70.9 percent of the total in Juveniles, defined as those persons under the age of 18, made up 35.8 percent of the total nwnber of arrests in 1998, an increase from 29.1 percent in From 1988 to 1998 the numbers of arrests and rates per 100,000 population decreased for juveniles and year olds. The rates of arrests per 100,000 total population decreased for those 40 years and older, however, the total nwnber of arrests increased from 1988 to (Table 7) As a percentage of the total, arrests of juveniles and individuals 40 and over increased, which is a reflection of the increase in the percentage of the population of those age groups Year b TABLE6 BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number and Percent of Arrests by Age Group Adult Juvenile Number Percent Number Percent 54, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Total 76,270 81,342 79,911 77,989 80,345 74,629 69,441 63, ,050 38,259 35, ,420 20,889 19, ,470 59,148 55, and 1991 data do not mclude amsts for San Bemardmo PD. b 1995 data docs not include arrests for Oakland PO or March-December arrests for Bakersfield PD. 12

16 Buq~lazy Arrests by Age (continued) j TABLE 7 BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Number of Arrests and Rate per 100,000 Population by Age Group Percent Age Percent Number Percent Percent Number Percent change in group of of of total of of oftota1 rate population arrests arrests Rate population arrests arrests Rate Total , , Juvenile , , , , , , , , , , , Notes: Rates are based on annual population estimates provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. Rates were calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the respective population, then multiplied by 100,000. Percentages may not add to due to independent rounding FIGURE4 BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Percent of Total Arrests by Age Group :1.. "' ~ < ';... c... ""' c... c: ~ u.. ~ A Juvenile Age Group

17 Bur~lary Arrests by A~e (continued) Over the 10-year period ( ) arrests for burglary declined in 16 of22 age groups shown in Table 8 (Juvenile-39 year olds). There was a 10.4 percent decrease in the number of juveniles arrested for burglary and a 34.0 percent decrease in the number of adults arrested, however, the number of arrests increased for all age groups above 40. \. Age group Total... 76,270 81,342 79,911 Juvenile Total 22,219 23,100 23,745 Under ,653 2,902 2, ,641 6,204 6, ,175 4,178 4, ,454 4,702 4, ,666 4,552 4,953 Adult Total 54,051 58,242 56, ,918 5,157 4, ,086 4,514 4, ,361 3,689 3, ,247 3,340 3, ,907 3,057 2, ,826 2,858 2, ,783 2,844 2, ,85 I 12,581 11, ,722 9,429 9, ,125 5,931 5, ,354 2,685 2, ,001 1,170 1, SS TABLES BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number of Arrests by Age Group b 77,989 80,345 74,629 69,441 63,981 24,883 25,059 23,244 22,135 20, ,768 2,903 2,425 2,287 1,996 6,818 6,742 6,367 6,266 5,853 4,716 4,860 4,492 4,311 4,266 5,130 5,168 4,893 4,453 4,307 4,978 4,867 4,653 4,489 4,182 53,106 55,286 51,385 47,306 43,063 4,938 4,769 4,396 4,072 3,924 4,103 4,148 3,433 3,280 2,966 3,584 3,443 2,857 2,506 2,347 3,193 3,209 2,709 2,319 2,076 2,780 2,844 2,498 2,211 1,816 2,490 2,520 2,456 2,050 1,705 2,327 2,270 2,136 1,923 1,700 10,543 10,946 9,986 8,970 7,874 8,508 9,037 8,750 8,122 7,401 5,650 6,214 6,248 5,975 5,649 2,930 3,476 3,443 3,363 3,240 1,127 1,415 1,445 1,527 1, and 1991 data do not include arrests for San Bernardino PD. b 1995 data docs not include arrests for Oakland PD or March-December arrests for Bakersfield PD ,470 59,148 55,595 22,420 20,889 19, ,073 2,042 1,921 5,966 5,451 5,104 4,647 4,214 4,018 4,866 4,577 4,271 4,549 4,301 4,347 40,050 38,259 35,696 4,018 3,897 3,942 3,195 2,993 3,095 2,453 2,379 2,300 1,974 2,006 1,910 1,706 1,644 1,484 1,485 1,417 1,359 1,412 1,312 1,173 6,805 6,350 5,621 6,308 5,866 5,075 5,135 4,881 4,390 3,077 2,956 2,867 1,522 1,512 1, Percent change

18 APPENDICES

19 APPENDIX A BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Number of Arrests and Percent Change by Gender, Race and Age Group Race and Total Male Female age of Number Percent Number Percent Number arrestee Change Change Total 76,270 55, ,266 44, ,004 11,556 Juvenile 22,219 19, ,604 16, ,615 3, ,128 15, ,159 12, ,969 2, ,851 5, ,786 4, ,065 1, ,847 9, ,303 6, ,544 2, ,355 4, ,726 3, , , White 30,325 19, ,615 15, ,710 4,220 Juvenile 9,605 6, ,308 5, ,297 1, ,574 4, ,387 3, , ,273 2, ,488 1, ,157 3, ,084 2, ,073 1, ,354 1, ,083 1, Hispanic 24,458 20, ,518 16, ,940 3,625 Juvenile 7,472 7, ,811 6, , ,774 6, ,923 5, ,727 2, ,139 1, ,546 2, ,898 2, Black 17,729 11, ,957 8, ,772 2,826 Juvenile 3,368 3, ,896 2, ,582 2, ,788 1, ,541 1, , ,814 2, ,103 1, ,183 1, ,008 1, Other 3,758 4, ,176 3, Juvenile 1,774 2, ,589 1, ,198 1, , Note: Percent change is not calculated when the base number is tess than SO. Percent Change

20 Race and age of arrestee Total Juvenile S SO+ White Juvenile S SO+ Hispanic Juvenile S SO+ Black Juvenile S SO+ Other Juvenile S SO+ APPENDIXB BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1988 & 1998 Arrest Rate per I 00,000 and Percent Change by Gender, Race and Age Group Total Male Female Rate Percent Rate Percent Rate Change Change S SOS S S ,14S.S 18S S3.S 1SS l.S S 4S S S SS.9 48.S S.3 4S S.8 6S.2 SSI.S 3S3.7-3S SS S S S S.S 17S.6 13S S 81.S S.O S 12.S S S S S.O S S2.S ,239.S 1, S S S S.8 31S.4 1S6.4 -S0.4 49S S II9.S S S.O , S48.3 S S S ,67S.O 1, ,648.S 1,49S.O ,6S6.0 S68.6-6S.1 2, S , S3.8 2, S S S S S S 224.S S S -1S.O S.O 8S.6 13S.O S S.4 S9.8 6S.1 S S S 4.4 Notes: Rates are based on annual population estimates provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of finance. Rates were calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the respective populations, then multiplied by I 00,000. Percent Change S S S.S S S S 27.1 S S8.1 17

21 County Total Alameda Alpine Amador Butte Calaveras Colusa Contra Costa Del Norte ElDorado Fresno Glenn Humboldt Imperial In yo Kern Kings Lake Lassen Los Angeles Madera Marin Mariposa Mendocino Merced Modoc Mono Monterey Napa Nevada Orange Placer Plumas Riverside Sacramento San Benito San Bemardinod San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Santa Cruz Shasta Sierra Siskiyou Solano Sonoma Stanislaus Sutter Tehama Trinity Tulare Tuolumne Ventura Yolo Yuba ,270 3, ,010 so 199 1,947 so , , , ,003 2, ,077 6,387 1,770 1, , , , ,342 3,585 I , , ss 1, ss 30, , , ,460 2, ,610 7,163 1,876 1, , , , , , ,911 3, , , , , , , ,475 2, ,589 7,229 1,525 1, , , , , APPENDIXC BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number of Arrests by County ,989 3, , , , los 53 26, , ,615 2) ,261 7,127 1,698 1, , ,659 sss , , ,345 3, , , , , , ,643 2).89 so 4,362 6,826 2,039 1, , , , , ,629 3, , , , , , , ,494 2, ,705 6,524 1,925 1, , , , , ,441 2, IS 1, z.o8t , , , ,481 2, ,599 5,923 1,670 1, , , ,981 1, , , IS 1, , , ,400 1, ,621 5,664 1,466 1, , , , Notes: Percent change is not calculated when the base number is less than 50. See footnote limitations on page ,470 2, , , , , , ,610 1, ,161 5,383 1, , , , ,148 2, , , , Sl 16) ass 120 los 4, ,560 1, ,900 4,797 1,329 1, , , ISO 1998 SS,S9S 2,105 s , , , , , ,830 1, ,746 4,713 1,083 1, , , , %Change

22 APPENDIXD BURGLARY ARRESTS, Number of Arrests by Cities with Population over 100,000 City Police Departments S o/o Change Total 36,629 38,667 38,880 36,SS3 38,2S2 34,948 31,833 28,211 27,741 26,354 24,809 Anaheim PO Bakersfield PO Berkeley PO Burbank PO Chula Vista PO Concord PO Costa Mesa PO El Monte PO Escondido PO Fontana PO Fremont PO Fresno PO Fullerton PO Garden Grove PO Glendale PO Hayward PO Huntington Beach PO Inglewood PO Irvine PO Lancaster PO Long Beach PO Los Angeles PO Modesto PO Moreno Valley PO Oak1andPO Oceanside PO Ontario PO Orange PO Oxnard PO Palmdale PO Pasadena PO Pomona PO Rancho Cucamonga PO Riverside PO Sacramento PO Salinas PO San Bernardino PO SanOiegoPO San Francisco PO San Jose PO Santa Ana PO Santa Clarita PO Santa Rosa PO Simi Valley PO Stockton PO Sunnyvale PO Thousand Oaks PO Torrance PO Vallejo PO Ventura PO West Covina PO S , ,16S ,251 10, b , S ,256 9,3S S S 1,06S ,052 1,666 1, lsi l,s ,279 1,747 1,03S ,4S S3 1,22S ,414 9,927 SIS 31S 1, ,1S2 1,493 1, SS 2SS 2S S SS S 1, , S6 1,413 7, ,138 40S Sl3 3,094 1,669 1,34S S 3S , S S 544 1,489 9,42S , SS3 3S ,859 2,007 1,305 7S , , ,282 7, , ,731 1,912 1, , ,046 6, ,291 1,656 1, , ,106 5, e ,231 1,450 1, , , ,858 1,448 1, , , ,775 1, , , ,682 1, Bakersfield PO {Kern County) only reported January and February arrests in b Moreno Valley PO began reporting in Percent change calculated Oakland PO (Alameda County) did not report in d San Bernardino PO (San Bernardino County) did not report in 1989 and

23 APPENDIXE BURGLARY ARRESTS, 1998 Number o[. Arrests bl!_ Coun~ and Age Catego[l. Coun!I Adult Juvenile Total Total 35,696 19,899 SS,S9S Alameda 1, ,105 Alpine s 0 s Amador Butte Calaveras 27 IS 42 Colusa Contra Costa 1, ,572 Del Norte ElDorado Fresno ,697 Glenn Humboldt Imperial In yo Kern ,601 Kings Lake Lassen Los Angeles 10,486 4,844 15,330 Madera Marin Mariposa Mendocino Merced Modoc Mono Monterey Napa Nevada Orange 2,898 1,463 4,361 Placer Plumas Riverside 1, ,830 Sacramento 1, ,964 San Benito San Bernardino 2,420 1,326 3,746 San Diego 3,034 1,679 4,713 San Francisco ,083 San Joaquin ,048 San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara 1, ,931 Santa Cruz 229 ISO 379 Shasta Sierra Siskiyou Solano Sonoma Stanislaus ,150 Sutter Tehama Trinity Tulare Tuolumne Ventura ,006 Yolo Yuba

24 APPENDIXF POPULATION ESTIMATES, 1988 & 1998 By Gender, Race/Ethnic Group, and Age Group Race/ethnic group and age group Total.... Juvenile Total Male Female Total 28,060,746 I4,I72,866 I4,220,282 33,494,000 7,537,277 3,880,I48 3,657,I29 9,426,I68 3,477,073 I,847,118 1,629,955 3,011,088 2,755,621 I,429,227 1,326,394 2,463,902 4,9I9,327 2,494,440 2,424,887 5,654,098 3,329,36I I,660,03I I,669,330 4,967,7I7 6,374,489 2,86I,902 3,5 I2,587 7,983, Male I6,8IO,I63 4,825,734 I,573,045 1,315,465 2,936,36I 2,492,503 3,667,055 Female I6,696,243 4,600,434 I,438,043 I, 148,437 2,7I7,737 2,475,2I4 4,3 I6,378 White... Juvenile ,636,033 8,204,993 8,43 I,040 17,258,003 3,520,92I I,808,796 I,712,125 3,769,068 I,736, , ,844 I,347,076 1,522, , ,514 1,081,843 2,936,085 I,494,790 1,44I,295 2,831,023 2,184,927 1,099,115 1,085,812 2,845,578 4,735,733 2,I20,283 2,6I5,450 5,383,4I5 8,549,249 I,937, , ,03 I 1,443,124 1,434,634 2,470,380 8,708,754 I,83 I, , ,812 1,387,899 1,410,944 2,9I3,035 Hispanic... Juvenile ,046,697 3,656,766 3,389,93 I I0,022,55 I 2,6I 1,919 1,35 I,974 I,259,945 3,847,685 l,i41, , ,608 1,027, ,600 4I0,23I 348,369 89I,520 I,I24,I95 585,I83 539,0I2 I,772, , , ,035 1,175, , , ,962 I,308,323 5, I 92,4 I 0 I,964, , , , , ,998 4,830,141 1,883, , ,44I 799,2I6 568, ,325 Black Juvenile ,032, ,575 I,033,068 2,309,152 6I4,258 3I I, , , ,550 I43, , , , , , , , , , , ,I54 I04,2I2 113, , ,488 I59,46I 20I, ,21 I I,I40, ,545 I3 I,640 96,664 I97,877 I58, ,736 I,l68, , ,633 84,656 I 97,635 I74,6I5 252,475 Other... Juvenile ,677,775 I,31 I,532 1,366,243 3,916, , , ,773 1,106, ,7I2 165, , , ,827 I27,892 I32, , , , , ,48I 32I, , , , ,328 2I5, , ,484 1,928, ,807 20I, , , , ,941 1,988, ,167 I90,323 I50, , , ,543 Source: Population estimates were provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. Note: Population breakdowns by gender, race and/or age will not add to total because ofvariations in population source data. 21

25

26 CJSC PUBLICATIONS ON THE INTERNET CJSC Outlook: Crime In Urban and Rural California (1987 and 1996) Crime and Delinquency In California (1996 to current) Crime and Delinquency In California (Advance Release) (1996 to current) Crime as Reported by Selected California Agencies, January through September (1995 to current) Hate Crime In California (1995 to current) Homicide In California (1995 to current) Prellmlnaly Report, Crime (1996 to current) Report on Arrests for Driving Under the Influence In California, 1997.Ammals Crime and Delinquency in CaHfornia Crime and Delinquency in CaHfornia - Advance Release CrimJnal Justice Prot11e - A Supplement td C&D (statewide and bldivldual countlea) Hate Crime in CaHfornia Homicide in CaHfornia Prel1mJnary Report. Crime (Janwuy-June and Janwuy-December) BCSII'ocaa amli'dnua& The Calll'ornia Experience in American J\M:llJle Justice: Some Historical Perspectives (December 1988) ControWng Plea Bargaining in CaWbrnia (September 1986) CoonitnaHng J1,18Uce in CaHfornia: '"l'bere ought td be a law about it" (December 1988). Crime Control and the Criminal Career (December 1992) The Development of CaWbrnia Drunk Driving Lcglslatlon (December 191,58) Employment and Crime (Febrwuy 1989) The Impact of California's "Prior Felo~ Convlctlon Law (September 1987) The Origins and Development of Penaltlea for Drunk Drivers in Ca1ifomla (August 1988) A PoUcy Role for Focus Groups: Communil;y Com:ctfons (September 1991) The Prevaience and Incidence of Arrests Among Adult Males in Calll'ornia (August 1988) The Social Structure of Street Drug Dealing (December 1988) CJSC* PUBLICATIONS IN PRINT BCS OUtloob Adult Felo~ Arrest DJspositions in IIODagraph Serha Consptcuoua Depredation: AutmnobUc Callf'ornia ( and ) Theft in Los Angeles, 1904 to 1987 Crime in California and the United States, (Maich 1990) 1982 (December 1983) ControJllng F~ Plea'Bargaining in Cr.lm.e in Urban and Rural Callfbmfa Calll'omia: The Impact of the Vlctlm's (December 1997) BID of Rights (1986) Crime in Urban and Rural California Development of a White Collar Crlme Index (November 1984) (December 1992) Felony Drug Arrests in CaJifomla, 1985 lncapacitauon StrategaCa and the Career (December 1986) Cr1mina1 (December 1992) Juvenllc Justice in Callfom1a, 1983 (June Meaaurlng White Collar Crime in 1984) Deposttmy Institutions (December 1993) Motor Vehicle 1bcft in California Prosecutnm Rcponse td Parental Child (December 1987). Stealing: A Statewide Study (Aprll1996) Motor Vebicle 1bcft Rccoveiy Data Race & DcUnquency in Los Angeles 1989 (October 1990) Juvenile Court (December 1990) Women in Crime: The Sentencing of Survey Report: "'1lu: Expansion of the Female Defendants (Aprll1988) Criminal Juatlce and Penal Syatem in California - Is greater coon:unatlon BCS Jlllpolta requh'edt (December 1988) Adult Felony Arrest Dtspoattions in Callforn1a (Aprll1992) Jllsaellaaeclu Crime in California and the U.S., 1980 Gang Organt:mtlou and MtgraUon/Druga, 1991 (Janwuy 1993) Gangs & Law Enforcement Crime in California and the U.S., 1988 Proceedings of the Attorney General's data (Janwuy 1990) Crime Conference 85 (September 1986) Effectiveness of Statutmy :Requirements Proceedlnga of Symposium 87: White for the Regl.stmtion of Sex otfenders - A Collar /InstituUonal Crime - Its Measure- Report td the Cal1fornia State Legis~ ment and Analysis Executive SUIDID81Y of the Flnal Report - Blue Ribbcm CnmmtssJon on Inmate CJ8C RepDn 8edn Populatlan Management IJanwuy 1990) Report on Arrests fur Driving Under the Parolccs Returned td Prison and the Influence in CaUforDia, ca1lfomia Prison Populatlcm (Janwuy 1988) Target Hardening: A Literature Rcvl.cw (October 1989) *Prior td 1991, the Criminal Justice Statistlcs Center (CJSC) was known as the Bureau of CrimJnal Statistics (BCS). If you need a publication, assistance in obtaining statistical information. or a customized statistical report, contact the CJSC's Special Requests Unit at the California Department of Justice. Criminal Justice Statistics Center. Special Requests Unit, P. 0. Box Sacramento, CA , Telephone: (916) , FAX: (916) , cjsc@hdcdajnet.state.ca.us 7/99