Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of:

Transcription

1

2

3 CatherineLune Grayson/UNHCR/Burundi/2006

4 Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: Strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); Resource mobilisation (leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal); Coordinated programme implementation; Joint monitoring and evaluation; Revision, if necessary; and Reporting on results. The CHAP is a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region and includes the following elements: A common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; An assessment of needs; Best, worst, and most likely scenarios; Stakeholder analysis, i.e. who does what and where; A clear statement of longerterm objectives and goals; Prioritised response plans; and A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the foundation for developing a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the InterAgency Standing Committee (IASC) Country Team. This team mirrors the IASC structure at headquarters and includes UN agencies and standing invitees, i.e. the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR. NonIASC members, such as national NGOs, can be included, and other key stakeholders in humanitarian action, in particular host governments and donors, should be consulted. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally each November to enhance advocacy and resource mobilisation. An update, known as the MidYear Review, is to be presented to donors in July Donors provide resources to appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of donor contributions and can be found on In sum, the CAP works to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time. ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS DURING 2007: AARREC AASAA ABS Abt Associates ACF/ACH/AAH ACTED ADRA Africare AGROSPHERE AHA ANERA ARCI ARM AVSI CADI CAM CARE CARITAS CCF CCIJD CEMIR Int l CENAP CESVI CHFI CINS CIRID CISV CL CONCERN COOPI CORD CPAR CRS CUAMM CW DCA DRC EMSF ERM EQUIP FAO GAA (DWH) GH GSLG HDO HI HISAN WEPA Horn Relief INTERSOS IOM IRC IRD IRIN JVSF MALAO MCI MDA MDM MENTOR MERLIN NA NNA NRC OA OCHA OCPH ODAG OHCHR PARACOM PARC PHG PMRS PRCS PSI PU RFEP SADO SCUK SECADEV SFCG SNNC SOCADIDO Solidarités SP STF UNAIDS UNDP UNDSS UNESCO UNFPA UNHABITAT UNHCR UNICEF UNIFEM UNMAS UNODC UNRWA UPHB VETAID VIA VT WFP WHO WVI WR ZOARC

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 Table I: Summary of Requirements By Appealing Organisation and By Sector IN REVIEW GOALS AND PRIORITIES EVENTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS CUMULATIVE RESULT IN TERMS OF REDUCING VULNERABILITY OR RISK LESSONS LEARNED FOR THE CAP FUNDING THE 2007 COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN THE CONTEXT AND ITS HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES A The context B The humanitarian consequences SCENARIOS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE RESPONSE PLANS A Agriculture B Coordination and Support Services C Education D Shelter and NonFood Items E Food F Health G Mine Action H Multisector I Protection/Human Rights/Rule of Law J Water and Sanitation STRATEGIC MONITORING PLAN CRITERIA FOR PRIORITISATION OF PROJECTS SUMMARY: STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE...22 Table II: List of Projects By Sector...24 ANNEX I. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES...29 ANNEX II. DONOR RESPONSE TO THE 2006 APPEAL...30 ANNEX III. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...51 Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on PROJECT SUMMARY SHEETS ARE IN A SEPARATE VOLUME ENTITLED PROJECTS iii

6 UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs iv

7 BURUNDI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The past year witnessed important milestones in the country s progress towards consolidation of peace and economic recovery. These include the signing of a ceasefire agreement by the last remaining rebel faction, the National Liberation Forces (Forces Nationales pour la Liberation [FNL]), on 7 September 2006, and the launch of longterm development planning frameworks such as the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). At the same time, the consequences of the decadelong conflict and the government s weak delivery capacity warrant continued humanitarian attention. Important humanitarian challenges remain in 2007, including the need to mitigate the negative sideeffects of the expected return of approximately 100,000 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and more than 390,000 refugees in view of the already scarce resources, in particular land. BASIC FACTS Burundi ranks as the 8 th poorest country in the world in the 2005 Human Development Index; 68% of the population lives under the poverty line; 41% of the population is chronically malnourished; More than one million people will require food aid in 2007; There are 100,000 IDPs and an estimated 395,000 Burundian refugees in countries of asylum, most of them in Tanzania. The Burundi CAP 2006 included many early recovery and peacebuilding activities in addition to the more traditional humanitarian projects in order to support the new government s momentous task of rebuilding a country emerging from a protracted crisis. Following the progress made in national planning for medium and longterm development activities however, the CAP 2007 will focus solely on core humanitarian concerns and is guided by the following three strategic priorities: 1. Surveillance of the humanitarian situation and early warning, with particular attention to the needs of displaced persons and returnees; 2. Rapid response to localised humanitarian emergencies; 3. Reduction of the vulnerability resulting from the lack of access to basic services. The Burundi CAP 2007 requests an overall amount of US$ million to implement its planned humanitarian activities. 1 All dollar figures in this document are United States dollars. Funding for this appeal should be reported to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS, fts@reliefweb.int), which will display its requirements and funding on the CAP 2007 page. 1

8 BURUNDI 2007 Table I: Summary of Requirements By Appealing Organisation and By Sector Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 Summary of Requirements by Sector as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Sector Name AGRICULTURE COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES EDUCATION FOOD HEALTH MINE ACTION MULTISECTOR PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW SHELTER AND NONFOOD ITEMS WATER AND SANITATION Original Requirements (US$) 14,955,020 1,208,171 1,147,150 59,947,436 14,920,390 5,131,320 25,431,225 2,732,890 3,307,964 2,866,556 Grand Total 131,648,122 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 2

9 BURUNDI 2007 Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 Summary of Requirements By Appealing Organisation as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Appealing Organisation ACF ADG APADE ARS CISV COPED CORD CRS Danchurchaid FAO FSD GVC HCB HI B IMC IRC NRC OCHA OHCHR Solidarités UNDP UNFPA UNHCR UNICEF WFP WHO Grand Total Original Requirements (US$) 3,318, , , , , , ,964 3,750,000 1,749,500 9,405,000 1,995, , , , , ,000 3,255,000 1,208,171 2,432,890 1,248, ,040 1,385,650 23,792,407 8,244,830 59,947,436 4,088, ,648,122 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 3

10 BURUNDI IN REVIEW Following its inauguration in August 2005, the new government embarked on a series of early recovery and development initiatives as it was eager to demonstrate the dividends of peace and to rebuild a country ravaged by the decadelong crisis. In support of these efforts the CAP in 2006 included early recovery and peace building activities in addition to humanitarian projects. 2.1 GOALS AND PRIORITIES The overarching goals and priorities agreed by humanitarian partners in late 2005 were to: Assure and strengthen early warning and rapid response to populations at risk; Support the process of transition from relief to development with an emphasis on short to mediumterm programmes focusing on population reinsertion and community recovery; Reduce disparities among different population groups and regions, especially concerning access to basic services and resources at the household level; Monitor protection and human rights issues affecting populations, human rights dissemination and promotion. The four most likely scenarios outlined in the CHAP 2006, notably stabilisation of the security situation, high vulnerability due to structural deficiencies, high level of repatriation and continuing return of IDP populations, remained accurate (with the exception of predicted returns of 150,000 Burundian refugees, which was revised downward to 55,000 as part of the midyear review process). Consequently, the overarching goals were maintained and interventions were not radically changed throughout the year. 2.2 EVENTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS The signing of a ceasefire agreement by the last remaining rebel group, FNL, was a major development in 2006 and led to a significant improvement of the protection situation of populations in the provinces of Bujumbura Mairie and Bubanza. Still, a continuous flow of cases of arbitrary arrests, killings and torture as well as sexual and gender based violence have been reported throughout the year. The gradual withdrawal of the United Nations (UN) peacekeeping force, due to be completed by the end of the year, is another sign of the improved security and protection situation. In order to replace the peacekeeping mission and to support the government s efforts in consolidating peace, the Security Council adopted resolution 1719 (2006) on 25 October 2006, which establishes the United Nations Integrated Office in Burundi (BINUB) effective 1 January BINUB s mandate focuses on core security and governance issues such as disarmament, reconciliation and human rights. Support for peace consolidation will also be the focus of the recently established UN Peace Building Commission (PBC), which has adopted Burundi as one of its first two focus countries. Despite these positive developments however, 2006 was characterised by a low level of return of displaced populations. At the time of writing it is doubtful whether the downwardly revised target of 55,000 Burundian returnees will be achieved (about 28,150 having returned by early October). This despite the Tripartite Commission for the Voluntary Repatriation of Burundian Refugees (Government of Burundi (GoB), Government of Tanzania and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)) having decided to shift from facilitation of repatriation to promotion on 20 June in response to the stabilised situation in Burundi. Nonetheless, other unforeseen movements were recorded, including the arrival of Rwandan asylum seekers, the return of Burundian asylum seekers from Tanzania, and the expulsion of Burundians living without refugee status in Western Tanzania. The number of Rwandan asylum seekers peaked around March at 20,000 in three sites in Ngozi and Kirundo provinces. A coordinated response involving numerous humanitarian actors (GoB, UN, NonGovernment Organisations (NGOs)) allowed the government and UNHCR to conduct individual refugee status determination. These were completed by the end of August. Approximately 5,000 refugees are still awaiting a decision on their status. 133 persons received the refugee status and the remainder were repatriated to Rwanda. In early April about 13,000 Burundian asylum seekers arrived within a week in Ruyigi province having fled to Tanzania due to food insecurity and the dire socioeconomic circumstances. They were forced to return, as their situation did not warrant a refugee status. Moreover, other Burundians have been 4

11 BURUNDI 2007 expelled from Tanzania over the course of the year. At the time of writing the number of registered expulsions was close to 3,000. A response was initiated with the support of the GoB, the Burundian Red Cross (BRC), UNHCR, World Food Programme (WFP), United Nations Children s Fund (UNICEF) and Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), which will remain important in A key development in humanitarian response was the launch of an Emergency Programme in February by the government to bridge emergency actions with the start of activities under the PRSP. Although half the activities featured in the programme were identical to projects incorporated in the CAP, cooperation and coordination between the government and the humanitarian community improved in the course of the year. In particular improvement was noticed at the central level through the National Aid Coordination Committee (NACC) and at the provincial level through the joint OCHA NACC missions in support of the focal point coordination system. The humanitarian community was able to conduct early warning and rapid response activities throughout the year, notably in the area of food security, agriculture and nutrition as well as in regard to population movements. In the health sector related activities were conducted through programmes against localised cholera, meningitis and malaria outbreaks, as well as through the improvement of epidemiological surveillance and referral systems. Rapid assessments and response mechanisms functioned well during the hailstorms and floods around April and May Some key humanitarian developments and achievement in priority sectors are outlined below. Food and agriculture: The beginning of the year was already marked by a bad 2006A harvest, which required a significant response in the areas of emergency agriculture and food aid. Until the beginning of the 2006B harvest, the distribution of food, seeds and tools conducted by all partners facilitated a better second harvest in the year. Similar activities were maintained for the 2006C season and in preparation of the 2007A season. In the latter case, approximately 15% of the Burundian population received agricultural assistance. Health: In May 2006, the GoB s decision to provide free health care to children under five years of age, strained an already poor health care infrastructure. To alleviate some of the new demands on the sector the humanitarian community, with the support of the European Community Humanitarian Office, provided threemonths of emergency stocks from October December 2006, pending a longerterm solution. Response to natural disasters and early warning activities: The humanitarian community responded to localised natural disasters such as rain, hailstorms and floods, the most serious of which occurred in April and May. These localised natural disasters were followed by immediate assessment missions and targeted distributions of the Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The World Health Organization (WHO) has undertaken early warning and response activities to outbreaks of epidemics such as cholera and malaria through established mechanisms like the food security early warning and control system (SAPSSA). WHO and FAO have jointly undertaken the surveillance of suspected bird flu cases and the establishment of national response structures. Education: 2006 also witnessed the end of the first school year after the implementation of the presidential decision to render primary education free of charge. Although UNICEF coordinated a response to absorb the massive increase in primary school children, an estimated 150,000 children could not be integrated into the first year of school. This had a knockon effect in the new school year that started in late September 2006 when the remainder of these children had to be integrated into classes. 2.3 CUMULATIVE RESULT IN TERMS OF REDUCING VULNERABILITY OR RISK Burundi continues to have enormous structural deficiencies and challenges, which made a reduction in vulnerability and risk difficult. Moreover, any humanitarian shortterm activities have to be complemented by longterm development activities to resolve the root causes of the recurring humanitarian crises in Burundi, which was not possible to achieve through the CAP alone. The two most significant sectors in which humanitarian response can not only save lives, but also contribute towards a reduction of vulnerability, are the food security sector and the multi sector. With regard to food security, it should be noted that even though the 2006A season production was the worst since 1995 due to the lack of rain and cumulative cyclical and structural weaknesses in the 5

12 BURUNDI 2007 postconflict context, efforts undertaken by FAO, WFP and its partners in preparation of the 2006B and 2006C seasons resulted in decent second and third harvests. It kept households active and prevented them from slipping away from fragile yet important stability. Consequently, the 2006B harvest was the best harvest of a B season in two years. Still, looking at 2006 as a whole, the production was down by 1%. Forecasts for the near future indicate that climatic patterns will be less erratic and allow for a decent 2007A season. Multi sector activities that had been undertaken by UNHCR and partner NGOs continued to play a vital role in the provision of assistance in shelter construction. As a result returning families were prevented from entering the vicious circle of lacking land, subsequently being forced into renewed displacement and experiencing increased vulnerability. A total number of 16,300 houses have been constructed by UNHCR alone, though the needs remained much higher than the envisaged assistance. 2.4 LESSONS LEARNED FOR THE CAP 2007 The most important lesson learned for the CAP 2007 is that the multitude of appeals and framework documents created confusion and affected the implementation of the CAP. As such, despite good initial intentions, the CAP 2006 proved too farreaching and a number of projects were not implemented as planned, particularly in the sectors of reintegration and economic recovery. The Emergency Programme, which was presented by the government in February 2006, was falsely perceived as a competitor to the CAP. To avoid such confusion in 2007 the IASC Country Team, in close consultation with the government, decided to jointly elaborate a downsized CAP that focuses on humanitarian activities. The CAP 2007 is consistent with government priorities for humanitarian action. This underlines the larger development frameworks such as the PRSP, which is expected to come into force in early In order to locate the gaps humanitarian activities should address, it is important to recall the four strategic areas of the PRSP for Burundi: 1. Improvement of good governance and the security situation; 2. Promotion of durable and equitable economic growth; 3. Development of human capital; 4. Fight against Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS). This is expected to address and improve the situation of six vulnerable groups: Populations living in extreme poverty; displaced populations (including IDPs and refugees); households affected by HIV/AIDS; childheaded and femaleheaded households; children and older persons; as well as disabled persons. 2.5 FUNDING The revised 2006 CAP for Burundi of $117,800,086 was 45% funded at the time of writing. The best funded sectors were multi sector, education and agriculture with 84%, 30% and 33% of the required funds received for each respective sector. Some of the least funded sectors included heath, with only 9% and mine action and water and sanitation with a mere 14% of required funds received. It should be highlighted that Burundi benefited, as one of the most underfunded emergencies, from two rounds of allocations of about $2 million each from the newly established Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF). The total CAP funding mentioned above already includes the CERF funds. 6

13 BURUNDI THE 2007 COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN 3.1 THE CONTEXT AND ITS HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES 3.1.A The context The context of humanitarian action in Burundi has changed significantly in 2007 in two main areas: (1) the signing of the long awaited ceasefire agreement between the GoB and the last rebel group on 7 September 2006; and (2) the submission of Burundi s PRSP due for approval in early Despite these positive developments however, extreme structural poverty and declining humanitarian and development indicators continue to plague the country. Burundi is one of the most densely populated countries on earth (just under 300 persons / km 2 ) without any particular natural resources worth mentioning. The population of Burundi is growing rapidly (22.5%), whilst its economy has been shrinking in net terms over the last decade (the Gross Domestic Product of Burundi dropped by 20% in real terms between 1993 and 2002). The newly elected government has launched many initiatives despite its important capacity limitations and has found goodwill among the international community. The biggest challenge will be to respond to the needs of the population quickly in order to decrease vulnerability and consolidate peace. The government plans to work with the International Monetary Fund s poverty reduction growth facility and the debtrelief process for highly indebted poor countries on the basis of a validated PRSP. If approved, this process could earn the country $1.5 billion in debt relief in nominal terms and free up investment for poverty reduction. As a result of the expected rollout of these frameworks, the CAP in 2007 will not address early recovery issues and has been limited to core lifesaving activities. Moreover, the PBC has selected Burundi, along with Sierra Leone, as primary focus of its work. The commission will launch and fund activities in the areas of: (1) promotion of good governance; (2) reinforcement of the rule of law and the security sector as well as; (3) community development with an emphasis on youth, street children, land conflicts, access to resources by women, IDPs and excombatants. Even though the operational component is not clearly defined yet, it is clear that the PBC will make considerable sums available to Burundi from its $142 million fund. This must be taken into consideration to better focus CAP activities. It will have an important impact for instance on human rightsoriented activities in the CAP as a whole. Even though protection will still feature in the CAP 2007, it will be concentrated on specific vulnerable groups such as returnees, IDPs, refugees, expelled persons, asylum seekers and vulnerable children. Due to the positive political developments in the country, it is inevitable that the capacity of humanitarian actors to deliver basic services would decrease as they either withdraw their activities or transition to more longterm development programmes. This important aspect should be considered in the development of a contingency plan in case of a deterioration of the political and socioeconomic situation in the country. It should also be noted that there will be a nominal change in the CAP Food aid, which is provided by WFP, used to be appealed for via the Great Lakes Region CAP. As such, food aid did not feature in previous CAPs for Burundi. WFP now decided to change this practice, which has lead to a disproportionate increase in the Burundi CAP 2007 budget for food aid. The overall Burundi CAP 2007 requirements, however, still reflect a significant decrease of 28% in comparison to the Burundi CAP 2006 (including the food aid component previously registered under the regional appeal). 7

14 BURUNDI 2007 Sector CAP 2006 CAP 2007 Change (%) Agriculture 16,339,740 14,955,020 8 Coordination and Support Services 3,274,164 1,208, Economic Recovery and Infrastructure 13,135, Education 21,872,340 1,147, Shelter and NonFood Items (NFIs) 3,649,022 3,307,964 9 Food 2 53,559,387 59,947, Health 19,336,923 14,920, Mine Action 3,930,400 5,131, Multisector 36,436,693 25,431, Protection / Human Rights / Rule of Law 7,060,211 2,732, Water and Sanitation 4,372,646 2,866, TOTAL 182,967, ,648, B The humanitarian consequences Humanitarian consequences are usually determined and anticipated through a joint needs assessment. However, since the decision to launch a CAP in 2007 was taken late, a comprehensive integrated assessment could not be undertaken. Statistics and data on expected or most likely humanitarian consequences are therefore derived from sectoral consultations supported by lead agencies. The following sections describe the situation per sector in detail showing the humanitarian consequences where measurable. The food aid sector was combined with Agriculture, whereas the sector of Economic Recovery was left out since no project was included for Food Security, Agriculture and Food Aid In the food security sector, household vulnerabilities are most apparent, particularly since 90% of the population live in rural areas. The 1% decrease of gross agricultural production in 2006 compared to 2005 continues to leave a big gap between food production and needs, which have continuously increased. Currently, 65% of the total population in Burundi lives below the minimum standard of daily calorie intake (2,100 kcal / person). This means that only about one third of the Burundian population has an acceptable diet. The population will also continue to face a food deficit even if all harvests in 2007 are good. This is compounded with high food and seed prices. In addition, the cassava mosaic disease (Ugandan strand) and diseases affecting banana plantations continue to affect parts of the harvests. Yet, coordinated and sustained emergency agricultural assistance in 2007 should allow humanitarian and development actors involved in Burundi to build on this significant albeit shortlived, household livelihood stability in order to move towards addressing more structural issues. Health / Nutrition Burundi is one of the countries where health indicators continue to feature as among the worst in the world. Malaria remains a primary public health concern. Despite the significant drop in costs further to the implementation of the National Protocol, the mortality rate remains as high as 47% for children under 5 years. Moreover, localised cholera and meningitis epidemics are certain to occur at the known intervals with a couple of thousand cases to be tested and possibly treated. Infections often are fatal because medical staff is inadequately trained, due to the absence of efficient control systems, poor performance of epidemiological surveillance systems, or underequipped laboratories. The rate of severe malnutrition is below the critical level of 10%, but this is offset by widespread chronic malnutrition (currently at 43%). The monthly average of admissions to supplementary feeding centres remains around 14,000. Malnutrition fluctuates according to the season and is contingent on topographic, climatic and other public health factors. The zones most at risk are large parts of Muyinga, Kirundo, Cankuzo and Karuzi. Whilst the decision on making aspects of health care free of charge is being implemented through the National Health Policy and the fiveyear National Health Development Plan, it will be important that humanitarian actors mitigate the negative consequences and the results of widespread vulnerability. 2 Food Aid was appealed for via the Great Lakes CAP 2006 and the amount has to be deducted from the total to arrive at the amount appealed for in the Burundi CAP

15 BURUNDI 2007 Key Health Indicators Crude Mortality Rate 1,2 1,9/10,000 per day Under Five Mortality Rate 190/1,000 per year Infant Mortality 114 in 1,000 live births Maternal Mortality 855 in 100,000 live births Source: WHO 2006 based on Interagency Evaluation 2005 UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 9

16 BURUNDI 2007 The population has been confronted with access constraints: many of the patients (8090%) go into debt or sell their belongings to pay for medical costs (policy of cost sharing varies from one province to the other); access to second level referral services still remains a serious problem without a solution; the capacity to carry out emergency surgical procedures is limited; the costs of a surgical intervention (a caesarean section for example costs between $150 and $400 in the public hospitals) are unaffordable; the referral system is only functioning in five provinces; many hospitals do not have the personnel and/or equipment to respond to emergencies. Admissions to SFC and TFC SFC admissions TFC admissions SFC TFC Jul05 Aug05 Sep05 Oct05 Nov05 Dec05 Jan06 Feb06 Mar06 Apr06 May06 Jun06 Jul06 Aug06 Month Year 0 Refugees / Repatriation (Multisector and Family Shelter) It is expected that in 2007 some 80,000 Burundian refugees will return to their country of origin. The majority of them will return to the Eastern and Central provinces. If the ceasefire holds and translates into concrete improvements of the situation on the ground, then returns to formerly conflictprone provinces are also expected to increase. Moreover, some 12,500 campbased and an estimated 18,500 urban refugees and asylum seekers from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) will remain in Burundi at the beginning of the year, taking into account the ongoing repatriation of some of the Congolese refugees that make up by far the largest part of the refugee population. It is envisaged that about 8,000 houses will be constructed for returnees and multisectoral assistance will be provided to receiving communities as well as to refugees. Moreover, the low level of returns of Burundians expelled from Tanzania is likely to continue, requiring continuation of the current response involving the government, the Red Cross, UN agencies and NGOs. 10

17 BURUNDI 2007 UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 11

18 BURUNDI 2007 Education For 2006 it was predicted that the negative humanitarian consequences would be high as a result of the presidential decision to provide free universal primary education starting September Even though the needs have increased and will continue to do so into 2007, there is ever less justification to consider this humanitarian consequences and needs. Initially, it was termed such, due to the shortterm nature of the response. However, one year on, these activities were taken off the CAP and are now seen as urgent development needs, though no longer humanitarian. As a result, humanitarian consequences in the sector are limited to emergency education and peace education of displaced populations including refugees, IDPs as well as for returning populations of certain vulnerability. Water and Sanitation The water and sanitation sector is marred by structural deficiencies, with some 50% of the rural population lacking access to potable water within a reach of 500 meters. Moreover, 70% are believed to be without proper sanitation facilities. This of course aggravates humanitarian consequences in many other sectors, in particular health and nutrition. Since the rehabilitation of the water and sanitation system will be: (a) a long and drawn out process, and; (b) a focus of development activities as of 2007, activities as part of the CAP will only focus on emergency response type initiatives. Protection The humanitarian consequences in the protection sector are limited even though the overall protection situation is still characterised by postconflict problems including torture, arbitrary arrests and killings. However, since the armed conflict has stopped with the conclusion of the ceasefire agreement, the most pressing humanitarian protection issues such as night time displacement and access do not arise any longer. This means that the humanitarian consequences in the protection sector will remain very limited in 2007 but will continue to be monitored and addressed if need be by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). The signing of a ceasefire agreement between the government and the FNL movement early September 2006 immediately had a positive impact on human rights in the provinces of Bujumbura rural, Bubanza and Cibitoke. The overall number of violations (mainly looting, extortion and disappearances) has significantly declined as rebel forces have remained quiet and officially allowed to get food supplies at the local markets without intervention from the national defence forces or the police. By contrast, little progress has been made in the field of transitional justice despite several high level visits to Burundi to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Discussions continue within the framework of the new PBC, which has chosen Burundi as one of its pilot countries. No CAP 2006 projects related to this topic have been implemented or at best only partially. Internal displacement has practically stopped. While most provinces have enjoyed relative security, apart from the occasional armed banditry, the number of IDPs returning to their homes has remained low. Harsh economic and agricultural conditions and lack of sufficient trust among communities may explain this status quo. But other factors, such as new opportunities and livelihood found in sites or villages may also contribute to this slow return. The overall number of IDPs in sites or villages is estimated at around 100,000 (no OCHA survey was conducted in 2006 to allow for precise comparisons). A greater number of persons still live with relatives or neighbours (socalled dispersed persons ) and are not accounted for in this figure. Lack of means to rebuild houses remains an additional obstacle to the return of both IDPs and returning refugees and is consequently a priority in the PRSP and PBC frameworks. In view of the evolution within the country, protection and human rights projects for the CAP 2007 will focus on specific groups directly affected by the conflict like returning refugees and IDPs. Mine Action Preliminary findings of the survey conducted by the Swiss Demining Foundation (Fondation Suisse de Déminage [FSD]) on the mine risk in all collines in Burundi show the contamination is much less severe than was previously thought. The FSD gathered accurate data on more than 97% of all communities and identified 192 mine/ Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) hazardous areas. In total 3.3% of the collines are affected and a total of merely 0.27% of the total population are directly affected. However, Suspected Hazardous Areas (SHA) are located in the vicinity of public places such as schools, markets, medical facilities or churches. About 50% of those SHA are believed to 12

19 BURUNDI 2007 contain mines, the other 50% locations of Unexploded Ordnance. The geographical distribution of SHA indicates that the provinces of Bubanza, Bujumbura Rural, Makamba, and Ruyigi are the most affected. The most prevalent resource blockages are agriculture and pasture land. Since mid2006 is the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) the key facilitator in the coordination of the mine action sector through its support for the Burundi Mine Action Coordination Centre (BURMACC). The sansaddresse of Kinazi In May 2006, the GoB made the site of Kinazi (Muyinga province) available so that UN and NGO partners would be able to assist Burundian nationals who have been expelled from Tanzania and have no place to go to in their home country. Many of them left Burundi with their parents as a result of: food shortage; lack of resources or land. Others were born in Tanzania but never regularized their stay. Ezechiel used to be a cobbler in Bukiriro in Tanzania, but one day he returned home only to Elias and his family in front of their community shelter in Kinazi find his wife and three children chased from their house by locals. He had to hide for three days in a forest before making his way across the border himself. The family is separated and their lives destroyed. When he arrived in Kinazi he was told that they had come through and left to join their family in Bugabira. Ezechiel is lost: I don t know her family and I don t even know where Bugabira is. Many of the individuals or families who arrive in Kinazi share similar stories. They have no connections to Burundi any longer. Few know where their relatives live, and even fewer have resources to sustain themselves. Elias, who returned to Kinazi with his wife and five children, says: I thought I could go to the community of my parents [Giteranyi] to settle, but the local administrator did not know how to help us and sent us back to Kinazi [transit site]. They have been stranded there since. Many new arrivals report others being forced to leave and the 3,000 who have come back so far, only seem to be the tip of the iceberg. Nobody knows for sure how many Burundians live in Tanzania without having regularized their stay, but most estimate around 150,000 persons. This will remain a key challenge in 2007, especially since the new arrivals need assistance and in particular socalled sans addresses like Elias, who hopes that the Burundian Government can find us a plot of land where I can build a house and send my children to school. Overall and across all sectors it should be reiterated that the structure of humanitarian consequences is conditioned by high structural vulnerabilities where minor disturbances (climatic, security or otherwise) could have an important impact. A good example of this is the household food security. According to the WFP Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping 2004, 16% of the Burundians live in chronic food insecurity, while on the other hand; only 16% of Burundians are considered food secure. The remainder will be able to stabilise and possibly improve its food security status only with the absence of drought and stable security conditions. The potential for absorption of such shocks remains extremely limited in Burundi and vulnerability patterns can deteriorate in a very sudden and rapid manner. 13

20 BURUNDI 2007 UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 14

21 3.2 SCENARIOS BURUNDI 2007 Based on reviews by the interagency contingency planning team (UN agencies, International Non Governmental Organisations and humanitarian donors), five emergency profiles have been identified: Population Influx Population Movement within Burundi Scenarios Epidemics (cholera, malaria, meningitis) Natural Disasters / Catastrophes Mass Repatriation Trigger Problems in the aftermath of the DRC elections Continuing food insecurity and localised security problems Structural deficiencies (notably water and sanitation, and interdependence situations and potential arrival of avian influenza Increasing demographic pressure combined with lack of land and climatic disturbances and interdependence with other situations Shift from facilitation to promotion in June 2006; combination of push and pull factors (e.g. expulsions from Tanzania and signing of ceasefire) Most likely case and/or operational objective Worst case and/or operational objective Smallscale influx of a couple of hundred refugees Assist 30,000 persons immediately (water, shelter, food, health, protection) Limited population movements (less than 10,000) largely due to food shortages. Ensure assistance to 140,000 persons initially over a twomonth period Seasonal localised epidemics with a limited caseload Largescale epidemic The operational objective depends on the type of epidemic Limitedscale disasters requiring sporadic assistance a total of 2,000 households mainly due to heavy rains Emergency assistance to between 200,000 and 500,000 persons About 80,000 returnees over the year and 10,000 expelled Burundians. Between 50,000 returnees per week and 300,000 returnees in one month It should be noted that neither the government nor the humanitarian actors with their current existing capacity could adequately address the gaps in the mass repatriation scenario. This lack of capacity will critically affect the quality of the response not only during the immediate phase of returns but also during the initial phase of reintegration with host communities. 3.3 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Although the PRSP puts a clear emphasis on combating poverty and structural development, it is understood that the slow onset of these activities will warrant continued humanitarian support to absorb shocks. A section on food security on the PRSP reiterates this by stating that: whilst working towards growth in production and the restoration of food security as well as an improvement of the nutritional situation, emergency assistance will be sought in order to assist persons affected by food shortages. Activities conducted, as part of the CHAP shall therefore complement those carried out under the PRSP. In addition, sectoral approaches might keep coherent with longer term oriented programmes so that the former do not affect the effectiveness of the latter. The strategic priorities for humanitarian response will thus reflect the overall logic of the CAP 2007 for Burundi. It will especially address contingencies and gaps that can arise from the slow onset of development activities and counter extreme vulnerability with a clear emphasis on live saving activities. The three strategic priorities for humanitarian response have been defined as follows: 1) Surveillance of the humanitarian situation and early warning with particular attention to the needs of displaced persons and returnees; 2) Rapid response to localised humanitarian emergencies; 3) Reduction of the vulnerability resulting from the lack of access to basic services. 15

22 3.4 RESPONSE PLANS 3.4.A Agriculture BURUNDI 2007 Agriculture Priorities Provide surveillance and early warning; Ensure and support rapid response; Assist vulnerable households. Objectives Provide immediate and quick support to populations who lose or have lost their means of production as a result of climatic shocks, crop pests, conflict and/or displacement; Support vulnerable populations during the lean period in order to ensure that agricultural potential during planting and harvest seasons can be drawn upon; Assistance in agriculture and small livestock to groups with special vulnerabilities, such as households without access to land, particularly IDPs and displaced persons as well as households with a vulnerability as a result of HIV/AIDS; Rehabilitation of rural infrastructure with a potential for high productivity including marshlands abandoned by fleeing populations. This will be prioritised in order to alleviate extreme vulnerability beyond the shortterm in order to limit emergency response interventions. Main Activities Coordination of agricultural activities will be ensured by FAO (Emergency and Rehabilitation Unit) and by WFP for activities in the area of food aid (see below). These are complementary and unified by common sectoral coordination mechanisms as well as common baseline data and methods. Concrete activities include: Distribution of agricultural supplies for the three agricultural seasons; Support through CashforWork programmes to the most vulnerable households in Burundi; Evaluation (twice a year) of harvests and supplies and deficits in terms of available food as well as the general nutritional situation. This will be done across the whole of Burundi in cooperation with the line Ministry, FAO, WFP, UNICEF and OCHA; Evaluation (twice a year) of the impact of joint distributions (seeds, tools, seeds protection rations) conducted by FAO and WFP; Participatory evaluation of the impact on particular communities benefiting from targeted assistance in a set number of provinces; Monthly early warning reports produced jointly by the provincial office of the line Ministry, UN agencies and NGOs within the SAPSSA framework. Main Partners FAO, WFP, UNICEF, OCHA, Direction Provinciale de l'agriculture et de l'elevage, CRS, Conseil pour l Education et le Développement (COPED), BRC, World Vision (WV), Solidarités, Action Contre la Faim (ACF), Action Aid. 3.4.B Coordination and Support Services Coordination and Support Services Priorities Coordinate monitoring of the humanitarian situation and early warning systems through implementation of the humanitarian reform agenda; Coordinate rapid and effective response. Objectives Strengthen IASC country team; Integration of coordination mechanisms into NACC structures; Properly functioning CERF mechanisms; Improved tools and services for integration with GoB and other frameworks (PRSP, United Nations Development Assistance Framework or other). Main Activities Conduct regular meetings (see underneath) in order to achieve efficient and effective humanitarian coordination; Conduct contingency preparedness exercise; Conduct joint rapid assessments and response; Coordination structures and fora will undergo a continued integration process with existing NACC structures. As it was already decided during the midyear review of the CAP 2006, NACC sectoral coordination and the aforementioned structures will be harmonised. NACC, which is already present via technical experts in each of the meetings, will gradually assume a more important role in the technical coordination meetings. Main Partners OCHA, NACC, BINUB, UNHCR, WFP, FAO, UNICEF, UNDP, Rassemblement, Echange, Solution des ONGs, Humanitarian Donors 16

23 3.4.C Education BURUNDI 2007 Education Priorities Emergency schooling assistance to returning refugee and IDP children. Objectives Improve access for children from vulnerable households, in particular returnee and displaced children, to quality primary education and primary school completion; Provide adequate infrastructure; Strengthen monitoring mechanisms to ensure adequate supervision of newly trained teachers and partners. Main Activities Primary school children from returning IDP and refugee families are provided with material and equipment to integrate in schools; Installation of additional temporary learning spaces using tents and plastic sheeting and rehabilitation of existing classroom units and latrines; Provision of training; Provision of teaching material and equipment. Main Partners UNICEF, UNHCR, WFP, NRC 3.4.D Shelter and NonFood Items Shelter and NonFood Items Priorities Alleviate suffering of the most vulnerable persons as a result of return of displaced populations; Mitigate humanitarian consequences of disasters. Objectives Support the voluntary repatriation of Burundian refugees in safety and dignity; Improve living conditions in areas of return through construction of shelters for returnees (and including displaced and other vulnerable families), based on a selfhelp scheme; Alleviate suffering of populations in destitute as a result of natural disaster (often microdisaster). Main Activities Further to multisectoral support to returnees provided by UNHCR (see below), a total of 5,200 shelters will be constructed for the most vulnerable populations; Provide emergency NFI assistance for populations in destitute. Main Partners UNHCR, GOVT (PARESI), Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), COPED, World Outreach Initiative (WOI), Association pour la Paix et le Développement (APADE), Communita Impregno Servizio Volontariato (CISV), WFP, FAO, UNICEF, UNDP 17

24 3.4.E Food BURUNDI 2007 Food Aid Priorities Provision of food aid to populations with emergency needs; Provision of food aid to most vulnerable households. Objectives Provide if necessary emergency food aid of populations affected by drought; Protect the limited means for subsistence and reinforce household capacity to absorb shocks; Contribute to an improvement of the nutritional status of vulnerable persons, in particular children and mothers; Facilitate access to basic services (notably education) with an emphasis on disadvantaged groups. Main Activities These interventions are completed by emergency response activities such as targeted distributions; selective nutrition for moderately and severely malnourished children; and the response programmes initiated via FoodForWork (FFW) and FoodForTraining (FFT) activities. Emergency interventions destined to meet the minimum food needs of vulnerable households incapable of producing sufficient amounts of their own, will decrease in favour of recovery operations. Recovery activities will allow to revitalise the means for existence of households and reinforce their capacities to resist eventual shocks. Food aid will be used to subsidise immediate needs of households engaged in recovery activities. FFW and FFT activities aim at reconstituting production means and improving access to basic services. In 2007, there will be 1,230,000 persons in need of food aid including emergency and recovery need. Main Partners Activities will include: Identifying and prioritising high quality projects; A better targeting process bringing together all stakeholders; A reduction of targeted distributions in favour of recovery activities (e.g. FFW and FFT); Launch of CashForWork activities; Close collaboration with partners, especially FAO and UNICEF; Resultsbased monitoring and evaluation; Conduct assessment of vulnerability and food security situation in Burundi, which will allow stakeholders to plan interventions beyond WFP, CARE, WV, CRS, BRC, Solidarités 18

25 3.4.F Health BURUNDI 2007 Health Priorities Maintain own surveillance and early warning mechanisms and support existing governmental mechanisms; Ensure rapid response to epidemics and nutritional emergencies; Provide support to most vulnerable parts of the population suffering from temporary disruptions in the health system. Objectives Improvement of the access to basic health services; Reinforcement of the early warning system for epidemics response; Reinforcement of systems for nutritional surveillance; Strengthening of coordination of interventions among partners (at central and peripheral level); Align all activities and priorities with the National Health Development Plan; Reduce maternal and neonatal mortality; Reduce risk and humanitarian impact of epidemics. Main Activities Develop an early warning and surveillance system to monitor the nutritional situation and to detect gaps and needs early; Improve preparedness and the response to new emergencies (avian flu, mental health, assistance to victims of mine actions); Provide emergency drugs for maternal and neonatal health care; Directly support vulnerable households in order to access health care system; Facilitate access to health and nutritional services of the most vulnerable populations; Extend the referral systems into additional provinces with a focus on maternal and neonatal mortality and continue emergency intervention towards maternal and neonatal health care; Reinforce community based nutritional surveillance and treatment (community therapeutic care); Conduct supplementary and therapeutic feeding through centres; Assistance and surveillance of nutrition malnutrition management; Strengthen Integrated Management Childhood Illness (IMCI) in key repatriation provinces. Main Partners WHO, UNICEF, IMCI, ACF, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Area Rehabilitation Scheme (ARS), Oxfam, Médecins Sans FrontièresBelgium, Gruppo Volontariato Civile (GVC), 3.4.G Mine Action The BURMACC is the national agency since August 2006, supported by UNDP, responsible for all humanitarian mine action activities which will lead the coordination while initiatives will be conducted by the NGOs in the sector. Mine Action Priorities Demining activities: The Republic of Burundi should become one of the first mineaffected countries on the African continent to be declared free from the impact of landmines and ERW within a short period of time. Objectives Accelerated clearance of high and medium impact areas to reduce the number of victims and increase access to social and economic assets; Development of national capacity in BURMACC within the Ministry of Interior and Public Security, to effectively coordinate and manage mine action operations, as the project will move from a UN managed programme to become a UNDP supported nationally owned programme between July and December Mainstreaming of mine action within national development plans, the UN development assistance frameworks and national Poverty Reduction Plan, and inclusion of the mine action programme within the national budget. Main Activities In order to bring a measurable benefit to the local population within a short period of time, mobile explosive ordnance destruction teams help quickly reducing the threat of those unexploded devices remaining scattered throughout the former conflict areas of the country; UNDP will support the coordination of activities in the sector through reinforcing BURMACC. Main Partners Ministère de l Intérieur et de la Sécurité Publique, UNDP, UNICEF, UNHCR, WHO, Danish Church Aid (DCA), FSD, Handicap International Belgium (HIB). 19

26 3.4.H BURUNDI 2007 Multisector (includes ONLY multisector refugee/returnee assistance) Multisector Priorities Alleviate suffering of the most vulnerable persons as a result of return of displaced populations; Evaluate effectively the needs of refugees and returnees. Objectives Promote the voluntary repatriation of Burundians in safety and dignity; Improve living conditions in areas of return and facilitate the reintegration of Burundian returnees within a joint UN approach; Provide protection and basic assistance to campbased DRC refugees and facilitate their voluntary return to DRC; Provide support to national structures responsible for returnees and refugees, plea for the promulgation of national law of asylum. Main Activities Al least 80,000 Burundian refugees return to Burundi in organised manner; 100% of returnees receive medical screening, returnee packages and are transported to their place of return; 100% of returnees have access to health care, including antiretroviral treatment. 100% of returnee children have access to primary education, including adequate school infrastructure and supplies; 9,000 heads of households receive construction materials to build their shelters on a selfhelp basis; Basic standards regarding food, shelter, health care and education assistance are met for all campbased refugees; The national law on asylum is adopted and national refugee status determination structures are in place. Main Partners African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes, WOI, COPED, Communita Impegno Servizio Volontariato (CISV), APADE, Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS), NRC, HealthNet International/Transcultural Psychosocial Organization 3.4.I Protection/Human Rights/Rule of Law Protection Priorities Support to local human rights partners in the field of human rights protection and defense; Prepare for a safe return and reinstallation of returnees and defenseless IDPs; Objectives Protection of the right to life; Prevent threats on the life of the most vulnerable population; Contribute to creating an return and reinstallation conducive environment, with a specific stress on the right to life of the beneficiaries; Strengthen the operational capacities of local and communitybased networks for the protection and the defense of most at stake rights of the most vulnerable population. Main Activities Field visits to monitor the human rights situation in areas with high risk of human rights violations, reports and analysis; Update the database on the human rights situation of the most vulnerable; Awareness raising campaigns for the protection of life affecting rights; Advocacy for the protection of life; Early warning in case of threats to life; Training and logistic support to partner local human rights networks. Main Partners BINUB, UNDP, UNHCR, UNICEF, OCHA, United Nations Educational Scientific, and Cultural Organization, NRC, ASF, Ligue Iteka, local media 3.4.J Water and Sanitation Water and Sanitation Priorities Emergency response to humanitarian situations, in particular population movements and epidemics. Objectives Provide water and sanitation in zones requiring emergency response (e.g. as a result of sudden refugee influx); Provide drinking water to particularly vulnerable populations. Main Activities Water and sanitation for emergency response in 5 provinces; Water trucking. Main Partners UNICEF, ACF, International Rescue Committee (IRC), Solidarités 20

27 4. STRATEGIC MONITORING PLAN BURUNDI 2007 The humanitarian community in close collaboration with the GoB agreed as part of the CHAP 2007 to integrate monitoring activities under the leadership of the NACC. In terms of concrete coordination mechanisms it was recommended by the NACC and maintained by the humanitarian community in Burundi to: Create a consultation framework which will bring together on monthly basis NACC, the IASC country team and key donors to continuously assess and review the implementation of humanitarian activities; Maintain and reinforce the three Thematic Groups (Food Security/Food Aid/Nutrition, Repatriation/Reintegration and Health/Nutrition) and ensure NACC cooperation and presence; Hold monthly IASC country team meetings including humanitarian donor representatives to monitor the humanitarian situation and response in Burundi; Maintain the provincial coordination mechanisms via the Focal Point meetings, under the coordination of the decentralised NACC antennae. It should be noted that the GoB has put an important emphasis on proper reporting structures and even though the CAP 2007 does not account for reporting mechanisms except for the FTS, it was agreed that reporting systems will be reinforced in terms of regularity and standardisation of reports by humanitarian actors and in terms of information management, sharing and guidance by the NACC. The aforementioned monthly meeting of humanitarian stakeholders will also take concrete action on assessment and evaluation of the humanitarian situation in Burundi, with the aim to arrive at an objective basis for humanitarian decisionmaking in 2007 and beyond. The strategic monitoring indicators against which the humanitarian community will monitor and measure progress include: 1. Quarterly acute and moderate malnutrition rate; 2. Percentage of households requiring agricultural assistance and/or food aid family ration; 3. Delay between early warning, and coordinated response; 4. Decisions implemented stemming from joint IASC Country Team/NACC consultation framework; 5. Epidemic mortality rate (cholera, meningitis, malaria); 6. Funding coverage per sector; 7. Ration of number of returnees re settled on their hill compared with the number of those staying in transit accommodation beyond a week; 8. Mother and child health consultations rate and % of birth medically assisted. 5. CRITERIA FOR PRIORITISATION OF PROJECTS The criteria for CAP project prioritisation will be based on their relevance to strategic priorities and sector objectives as defined. Moreover, the following criteria will be considered for prioritisation: 1. Alignment with the CHAP 2007 priorities and complementarities with other frameworks of intervention; 2. The project conducts lifesaving activities; 3. The project follows IASC country team recommendations; 4. The appealing agency has experience in the sector and ideally a track record in Burundi. In line with section four above, a comprehensive joint evaluation of the humanitarian situation shall be conducted next year following tools such as the Needs Analysis Framework. This would provide an objective, quantitative as well as qualitative basis for the prioritisation of humanitarian activities, but shall also allow highlighting linkages, gaps and complementarities between the humanitarian response and development programmes. 21

28 BURUNDI SUMMARY: STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Strategic Priority Response Plan Associated Projects Ensure surveillance of the humanitarian situation and early warning and across all CAP sectors in the whole of Burundi, with particular attention to the areas of food security/agriculture, nutrition, health and multisector (population movement). Ensure a rapid response to localised humanitarian situations with particular attention to the areas of food and agricultural assistance, health, nutrition, assistance to disaster victims and assistance to moving populations in distress. Agriculture and Food Aid Coordination and Support Services SAPSAA Early warning System Early warning reports and monitoring (includes contingency planning) Health Nutritional Surveillance; Monitoring and early warning of epidemics. Multisector Monitoring of population movements and returns Protection / Human Rights / Rule of Law FAO SAPSAA WFP Food aid UNICEF Malnutrition management/surveillance and assistance OCHA Coordination of humanitarian activities WHO / UNICEF Early warning and rapid response to epidemics UNICEF Malnutrition management ACF Integrated programme against malnutrition UNHCR Repatriation and reintegration of Burundian refugees UNHCR Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi OCHA Coordination of humanitarian activities NRC Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi Monitoring of HR situation OHCHR Monitoring of HR situation in areas of repatriation and resettlement NRC Counselling and legal assistance for IDPs and returning refugees Agriculture Emergency agricultural assistance FAO Emergency agricultural assistance to vulnerable rural populations GVC Emergency agricultural assistance to vulnerable populations Coordination and Emergency response OCHA Coordination of humanitarian activities Support Services coordination Education Special emergency assistance UNICEF Special emergency assistance NRC Teacher Emergency Package Family Shelter and NFI Emergency NFI provision UNICEF Emergency relief and response Food Emergency Food Aid WFP Food Aid Health Rapid Response to epidemics; Rapid response in neonatal / maternal emergencies. WHO/UNICEF Early warning and rapid response to epidemics UNFPA Assistance in maternal and neonatal emergencies GVC Assistance in maternal and neonatal emergencies ARS Emergency assistance to waraffected populations Mine Action Rapid demining response. DCA Mine clearance FSD National mine action response Multisector Rapid response to population UNHCR Protection and Assistance of Refugees in Burundi influx. Protection / Human Emergency protection Help Channel Emergency assistance to returning orphans Rights / Rule of Law assistance. Water and Sanitation Emergency water and sanitation. UNICEF Emergency water provision IRC Emergency water provision Solidarités Water and sanitation for emergency response 22

29 BURUNDI 2007 Strategic Priority Response Plan Associated Projects Mitigate life threatening impact of lack of access to basic services (notably in health) and combat humanitarian crises resulting from extreme vulnerability across all parts of the population Agriculture Protection and rehabilitation of agricultural zones; Distribution of agricultural supplies (seeds and tools); Seed and livelihood support (fairs, CFW and FFW); Diversifying agricultural activities Coordination and Support Services Integration of activities into mid and longterm support frameworks FAO Assistance to vulnerable HH with limited access to land FAO Rehabilitation of agricultural zones FAO Rehabilitation of traditional seed production and exchange mechanisms CRS Cash injection for poor households CRS Seed and Livelihood fairs Solidarités Diversifying farming activities Solidarités CashforWork ACF Support to food economy of most vulnerable HH ACF CashforWork ADG Protection of river zones OCHA Coordination of humanitarian activities Family Shelter and NFI Shelter construction APADE Shelter construction COPED Reintegration support CORD House and latrine construction NRC Shelter construction CISV Shelter construction (2x) Food Distribution of food aid to borderline food insecure populations Health Emergency care and referral service; Support of Ministry of Health and BPS response systems; Enable access to health care of vulnerable populations; Community based activities countering malnutrition. Mine Action Victim assistance; Mine action response support. Multisector Repatriation and reintegration support Protection Human HR monitoring and Rights and Rule of Law sensitisation; Integration of local HR mechanisms. Water and Sanitation Enabling access to water and sanitation WFP Food aid WHO Assistance to trauma victims (mines) WHO Decentralised support to Ministry of Health coordination WHO / UNICEF Strengthening of IMCI in repatriation provinces WHO / UNICEF / UNFPA Improve access to basic health service for vulnerable populations International Medical Corps Nutrition support ACF Nutrition support UNDP Support to BURMACC UNICEF Mine risk education and victim assistance programme HIB Monitoring victim assistance UNHCR Repatriation and reintegration of Burundian refugees OHCHR Sensitisation towards the respect of human life OHCHR Support to local HR networks to improve protection of conflict affected populations ACF Access to clean water in Moso (Ruyigi) 23

30 BURUNDI Table II: List of Projects By Sector Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 List of Projects By Sector as of 15 November Project Code Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Appealing Agency Sector/Activity Page 1 of 5 Original Requirements (US$) AGRICULTURE BDI07/A01 ACF Food Economy Support to Vulnerable Households in 963,000 Ruyigi, Ngozi, Kayanza and Bubanza BDI07/A02 ACF Cash for Work in the provinces of Kayanza and Ngozi 280,000 BDI07/A03 ADG Sécurisation des terres riveraines des eaux contre la 200,000 sécheresse dans la région aride du Bugesera et diversification des opportunités économiques. BDI07/A04 CRS Seed & Livelihood Fairs 2,250,000 BDI07/A05 CRS Cash for Work 1,500,000 BDI07/A06 FAO Agriculture support to vulnerable populations with limited 770,000 land access (small livestock and vegetable seeds) BDI07/A07 FAO Emergency Agricultural Assistance to most vulnerable and 4,400,000 disaster affected populations and to specific chronically vulnerable groups BDI07/A08 FAO Rehabilitation of areas with high agricultural production 1,265,000 potential for populations recently reinstalled BDI07/A09 FAO Agricultural and Food Security Early Warning and Control 880,000 System (SAPSSA) and Coordination BDI07/A10 FAO Rehabilitation of traditional production and trade 2,090,000 mechanisms for seeds and highyield plants through the strengthening of associations of producers BDI07/A11 GVC Emergency Agricultural Support to vulnerable persons in 110,600 Kirundo BDI07/A12 Solidarités Food security in Muramvya and Cankuzo 246,420 Subtotal for AGRICULTURE 14,955,020 COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES BDI07/CSS01 OCHA Coordination of Humanitarian Activities 1,208,171 Subtotal for COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 1,208,171 EDUCATION BDI07/E01 NRC Teacher s Emergency Package (TEP) 885,000 BDI07/E02 UNICEF Special Emergency Assistance to Basic Education for 262,150 returning refugees and IDPs Subtotal for EDUCATION 1,147,150 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 24

31 BURUNDI Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 List of Projects By Sector as of 15 November Project Code Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Appealing Agency Sector/Activity Page 2 of 5 Original Requirements (US$) FOOD BDI07/F01 WFP Support to the stabilization and recovery of Burundi: Protect 59,947,436 and create livelihoods while improving the nutritional status of the most vulnerable (PRRO ) Subtotal for FOOD 59,947,436 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 25

32 BURUNDI Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 List of Projects By Sector as of 15 November Project Code Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Appealing Agency Sector/Activity Page 3 of 5 Original Requirements (US$) HEALTH BDI07/H01 ACF Nutrition for mothers and infants affected by HIV/AIDS 300,000 BDI07/H02 ACF Integrated Programme for the Prevention and the Fight 1,400,000 against Malnutrition BDI07/H03 ARS Emergency psychosocial support in Bujumbura Mairie and 197,874 Muramvya provinces BDI07/H04 GVC Reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality in Bujumbura 380,000 Rural BDI07/H05 IMC Nutrition support to HIVAIDS patients in Kirundo province 522,000 BDI07/H06 IMC Support of Kirundo and Rutana provincial health authorities 417,000 emergency care and referral services. BDI07/H07 UNICEF Psychosocial support for Vulnerable children 374,500 BDI07/H08 WHO Decentralized support to MOH / Coordination in the Health 335,445 Sector in Burundi BDI07/H09 WHO Assistance to war and landmine victims 216,568 BDI07/H10A UNICEF Enhancing the management of complications, especially 2,441,606 maternal and neonatal emergencies through an operational referral system. BDI07/H10B WHO Enhancing the management of complications, especially 870,462 maternal and neonatal emergencies through an operational referral system. BDI07/H10C UNFPA Enhancing the management of complications, especially 583,150 maternal and neonatal emergencies through an operational referral system. BDI07/H11A WHO Implementing IMCI (Integrated Management of Childhood 1,118,150 Illness) strategy in Repatriation Provinces (Bururi, Cankuzo, Makamba, Muyinga, Rutana and Ruyigi). BDI07/H11B UNICEF Implementing IMCI (Integrated Management of Childhood 706,200 Illness) strategy in Repatriation Provinces (Bururi, Cankuzo, Makamba, Muyinga, Rutana and Ruyigi). BDI07/H12A WHO Epidemic Response and Strengthening an Early Warning 876,865 System for epidemic diseases control, Emergency preparedness BDI07/H12B UNICEF Epidemic Response and Strengthening an Early Warning 841,100 System for epidemic diseases control, Emergency preparedness BDI07/H13A WHO Access to Health Services to vulnerable persons 670,890 BDI07/H13B UNICEF Access to Health Services to vulnerable persons 823,900 BDI07/H13C UNFPA Access to Health Services to vulnerable persons 802,500 BDI07/H14 UNICEF Malnutrition management 1,042,180 Subtotal for HEALTH 14,920,390 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 26

33 BURUNDI Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 List of Projects By Sector as of 15 November Project Code Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Appealing Agency Sector/Activity Page 4 of 5 Original Requirements (US$) MINE ACTION BDI07/MA01 Danchurchaid Humanitarian Mine Action Burundi 1,749,500 BDI07/MA02 HI B Monitoring Victim Assistance and Mine Risk Education 457,000 programmes BDI07/MA03 FSD National Mine Action Rapid Response Capacity 1,995,980 (Community liaison/threat awareness; Area Reduction; and Landmine/ERW Clearance) BDI07/MA04 UNICEF Community Based Mine Risk Education and Advocacy 240,800 BDI07/MA05 UNDP Support to the Burundi National Humanitarian Mine Action 688,040 Programme Subtotal for MINE ACTION 5,131,320 MULTISECTOR BDI07/MS01 APADE Assistance to the reinstallation of repatriates and displaced 349,036 Burundians BDI07/MS02 HCB Emergency assistance to returning orphans 276,458 BDI07/MS03 NRC Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi 370,000 BDI07/MS04 UNICEF Emergency relief and response 643,324 BDI07/MS05 UNHCR Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi 3,568,013 BDI07/MS06 UNHCR Repatriation and Reintegration of Burundian Refugees 20,224,394 Subtotal for MULTISECTOR 25,431,225 PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW BDI07/P/HR/RL01 NRC Counselling and Legal Assistance for IDPs and Returning 300,000 Refugees BDI07/P/HR/RL02 OHCHR Awareness raising on the respect for human life 507,592 BDI07/P/HR/RL03 OHCHR Monitoring of the human rights situation in the areas of 503,361 return and resettlement of waraffected populations BDI07/P/HR/RL04 OHCHR Support to the local human rights networks for a better 1,421,937 protection of the war affected Subtotal for PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW 2,732,890 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 27

34 BURUNDI Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2007 List of Projects By Sector as of 15 November Project Code Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation. Appealing Agency Sector/Activity Page 5 of 5 Original Requirements (US$) SHELTER AND NONFOOD ITEMS BDI07/S/NF01 CORD House and latrine construction and agricultural inputs _for 467,964 returnees and vulnerable in Giharo commune (Rutana province) BDI07/S/NF02 CISV Reinsertion of conflict affected populations in the provinces 210,000 of Ngozi and Muyinga BDI07/S/NF03 CISV Reinsertion of vulnerable returnee families in Karuzi 430,000 BDI07/S/NF04 COPED Reintegration support to vulnerable returnee populations in 500,000 Bururi and Ruyigi province BDI07/S/NF05 NRC Family Shelter Provision 1,700,000 Subtotal for SHELTER AND NONFOOD ITEMS 3,307,964 WATER AND SANITATION BDI07/WS01 ACF Improvement of access to potable water for the most 375,000 vulnerable households in Ruyigi BDI07/WS02 IRC Water and Sanitation Emergency Response (national/all 620,000 provinces) BDI07/WS03 Solidarités Water and sanitation in Bujumbura rural, Bururi, Muramvya, 1,002,486 Gitega, Cibitoke, Ruyigi and Mwaro and all over Burundi for the emergency response BDI07/WS04 UNICEF Water supply in emergencies 869,070 Subtotal for WATER AND SANITATION 2,866,556 Grand Total 131,648,122 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 28

35 BURUNDI ANNEX I. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES BURUNDI APPEAL TOTAL FOR 2007: CHF 3,584,043(US$ 2,854,623 or EUR 2,249,465) Note: This budget figure is subject to change as the appeal is currently being revised. Please refer to for details on the Appeal where the updated narrative and budget will be issued shortly. National society context and priorities in 2007 Given its immediate past history, the primary strategy of the Burundi Red Cross (BRC) at this stage is to renew the goodwill of the Federation, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and bilateral partners to harness technical support for rebuilding its leadership, management, programme development and implementation capacity. In addition, development of a local resource base is high on the national society s list of priorities to facilitate the impact of service delivery to the communities it serves. Through such impact, the national society will demonstrate is reliable to deliver assistance to the most venerable by both Movement and nonmovement partners. In order to make a meaningful contribution towards the realisation of the Federation s Strategy 2010 and the Algiers Plan of Action and meet the characteristic of a wellfunctioning national society, another priority for the Burundi Red Cross Society is to have a strategic plan in place in early 2006 to chart out the direction for the national society for the next four years. However discussions are ongoing. The vision for the Federation Secretariat during the period is to strengthen the BRC into a wellfunctioning society. Federation support will, therefore, focus on addressing capacity issues at all levels including governance, management and operational levels. Organizational development: The national society will develop a strategic plan to chart out directions for the period based on the plan and develop a cooperation agreement strategy. Some of the activities include: Develop a staff development strategy to include intensive field managers induction and refresher courses at regular intervals. Disseminate and equip field managers with tools such as policy documents, guidelines standard procedures to facilitate their work. Hold quarterly meetings between headquarters staff and field managers to review programme management and take advantage of the forum for inservice training and coaching. Coordination and management: The Secretariat will continue to promote Federation and Movement policies, standards, tools and provide support for the Burundi Red Cross to continue with the Movement/Federation global and/or regional commitments. The evolving humanitarian order means, amongst other things, that to be a wellfunctioning national society must expand its partnership and resource base beyond the Movement. To this effect, support for the establishment, nurturing and the coordination of strategic nonmovement partnerships will be a major activity for the Federation Secretariat. 29

36 BURUNDI ANNEX II. DONOR RESPONSE TO THE 2006 APPEAL Table I: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2006 Requirements, Commitments/Contributions and Pledges per Appealing Organisation as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations APPEALING ORGANISATION Original Revised Funding % Requirements Requirements Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ A B C C/B BC D ABS 224,020 0% ACF 800, ,000 0% 800,000 ARM 1,730,000 1,088,500 0% 1,088,500 CADI 264, ,058 0% 264,058 CCIJD 100,494 41,013 0% 41,013 CENAP 69,500 69,500 0% 69,500 CIRID 195, ,199 0% 195,199 CISV 1,258, ,700 0% 427,700 CORD 1,274,053 1,274,053 0% 1,274,053 CRS 2,510,000 2,510,000 0% 2,510,000 Danchurchaid 1,420,000 1,420,000 0% 1,420,000 FAO 11,995,750 11,553,100 5,090,969 44% 6,462,131 HI B 488, ,000 0% 488,000 HI/France 1,106, ,000 0% 562,000 JVSF 204, ,000 0% 102,000 NNA 259, ,880 0% 259,880 NRC 3,080,000 3,305,370 0% 3,305,370 OA 991, ,860 0% 991,860 OCHA 2,054,164 2,054, ,845 30% 1,436, ,000 ODAG 219, ,912 0% 219,912 OHCHR 2,351,882 2,168, ,290 37% 1,375,268 RFP 304, ,750 0% 304,750 Solidarités 800,000 1,621,567 0% 1,621,567 UN Agencies 0% 779,479 UNDP 11,081,825 6,164, ,789 16% 5,185,536 1,261,425 UNESCO 10,030,445 10,143,445 0% 10,143,445 UNFPA 2,454,750 2,457,750 0% 2,457,750 UNHABITAT 2,000,000 1,000,000 0% 1,000,000 UNHCR 37,808,373 30,905,196 30,330,985 98% 574,211 1,256,281 UNICEF 26,301,481 29,992,820 13,566,231 45% 16,426, ,000 UNIFEM 266, ,000 0% 266,000 UNMAS 1,025,475 1,025, ,665 54% 471,810 UPHB 75,000 75,000 0% 75,000 WFP 1,220, ,500 0% 813,500 WHO 3,442,718 3,235,391 1,539,395 48% 1,695,996 GRAND TOTAL 129,407, ,800,086 53,471,169 45% 64,328,917 4,097,185 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carryover Pledge: Commitment: Contribution: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 30

37 BURUNDI Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2006 Requirements, Commitments/Contributions and Pledges per Sector as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organisations SECTOR Original Requirements Revised Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Value in US$ AGRICULTURE COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE EDUCATION FOOD HEALTH MINE ACTION MULTISECTOR PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED SHELTER AND NONFOOD ITEMS WATER AND SANITATION A B C C/B BC D 16,339,740 15,621,109 5,090,969 33% 10,530,140 3,274,164 2,867, ,845 22% 2,249, ,000 13,135,750 6,967, ,789 14% 5,988,461 21,872,340 24,981,716 7,393,274 30% 17,588,442 0% 19,336,923 16,994,059 1,639,395 10% 15,354,664 3,930,400 3,930, ,665 14% 3,376,735 36,436,693 31,130,566 30,330,985 97% 799,581 7,060,211 6,705, ,290 12% 5,912,597 5,831,119 0% (5,831,119) 3,997,185 3,649,022 3,649,022 0% 3,649,022 4,372,646 4,952, ,838 5% 4,710,575 GRAND TOTAL 129,407, ,800,086 53,471,169 45% 64,328,917 4,097,185 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carryover Pledge: Commitment: Contribution: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 31

38 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 1 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ AGRICULTURE BDI06/A01: Food Security for Vulnerable Households in Ruyigi Province ACF 400, ,000 0% 400,000 BDI06/A02: Food Security in Gitega Province ARM 393, ,500 0% 206,500 BDI06/A03: Food Security for Young People CCIJD 100,494 41,013 0% 41,013 BDI06/A04: Enhanced Community Livelihood and Food Security CRS 2,200,000 2,200,000 0% 2,200,000 BDI06/A05: Community Reconstruction and Reintegration in Rutana Province BDI06/A06: Stockbreeding in Karuzi Province CORD 390, ,696 0% 390,696 CISV 59,800 29,800 0% 29,800 BDI06/A07: Rehabilitation of Rural Communities Infrastructure FAO 1,310,000 1,310, ,000 23% 1,010,000 BDI06/A08: Livestock Production for Vulnerable Rural Families FAO 450, ,000 0% 450,000 BDI06/A09: Rehabilitation of Community and Household Reforestation FAO 468, ,300 0% 234,300 BDI06/A10: ReLaunching of Smallscale Fishing Activities FAO 299, , , % (350,179) BDI06/A11: Distribution of diseasefree cassava cuttings and diversification FAO 964, ,000 1,552, % (588,620) of other rootcrops BDI06/A12: Emergency Agricultural Assistance: Home Gardening and Fruit FAO 1,182,000 1,182,000 0% 1,182,000 Production for Vulnerable Populations BDI06/A13: Emergency Agricultural Assistance to Disasteraffected Rural Populations FAO 4,400,000 4,400,000 2,291,440 52% 2,108,560 BDI06/A14: Integrated Communitybased Food Security and Nutrition FAO 261, , , % (166,930) BDI06/A15: Agricultural and Food Security Early Warning and Control System (SAPSSA) and Coordination BDI06/A16: MicroFarming Development in mine cleared lands areas FAO 975, ,000 0% 975,000 FAO 76,650 0% BDI06/A17: Marsh Recovery and Water Management in Cankuzo and Muramvya Provinces Solidarités 800, ,000 0% 800,000 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 32

39 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 2 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ AGRICULTURE BDI06/A18: Community Agriculture: Quality Seed Exchange and Conservation BDI06/FAO: Awaiting allocation to specific project FAO 1,608,000 1,608,000 0% 1,608,000 FAO 0% Subtotal for AGRICULTURE 16,339,740 15,621,109 5,090,969 33% 10,530,140 COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES BDI06/CSS01: Coordination of Humanitarian Activities OCHA 2,054,164 2,054, ,845 30% 1,436, ,000 BDI06/CSS02: Aircraft Services for Relief and Rehabilitation Activities in Burundi WFP 1,220, ,500 0% 813,500 Subtotal for COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 3,274,164 2,867, ,845 22% 2,249, ,000 ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE BDI06/ER/I01: Housing Reconstruction in Kirundo Province ARM 781, ,000 0% 400,000 BDI06/ER/I02: Housing Rehabilitation for Displaced and Repatriated Women RFP 304, ,750 0% 304,750 BDI06/ER/I03: Integrated Community Recovery and Reconstruction UNDP 7,100,000 3,550, ,789 28% 2,571,211 BDI06/ER/I04: Occupational Reintegration for Young People UNDP 950, ,500 0% 712,500 BDI06/ER/I05A: Housing Rehabilitation and Construction UNDP 2,000,000 1,000,000 0% 1,000,000 BDI06/ER/I05B: Housing Rehabilitation and Construction UNHABITAT 2,000,000 1,000,000 0% 1,000,000 Subtotal for ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 13,135,750 6,967, ,789 14% 5,988,461 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 33

40 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 3 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ EDUCATION BDI06/E01: School Construction in Ruyigi Province ARM 556, ,000 0% 482,000 BDI06/E02: Primaryschool Hygiene in Ruyigi province CADI 264, ,058 0% 264,058 BDI06/E03: Expanded Access to Education in Karuzi Province CISV 878, ,700 0% 319,700 BDI06/E04: Community Reconstruction and Reintegration in Rutana Province BDI06/E05: Educational Opportunities for Young People CORD 614, ,303 0% 614,303 JVSF 123,000 62,000 0% 62,000 BDI06/E06A: Emergency Assistance to Basic and Secondary Education UNICEF 9,867,424 13,557,600 7,267,030 54% 6,290,570 BDI06/E06B: Emergency Assistance to Basic and Secondary Education UNESCO 2,689,400 2,802,400 0% 2,802,400 BDI06/E07: Teacher s Emergency Package NRC 590, ,000 0% 590,000 BDI06/E08: School Rehabilitation and Basic Education in Rural and Urban Areas OA 545, ,860 0% 545,860 BDI06/E09: Teacher s Emergency Package UNESCO 701, ,730 0% 701,730 BDI06/E10: Support to Street Children s Education UNESCO 194, ,360 0% 194,360 BDI06/E11: Vocational Training for Conflict and HIV/AIDSaffected Youth UNESCO 3,139,705 3,139,705 0% 3,139,705 BDI06/E12: Reintegration of separated and displaced children UNICEF 868, , ,244 15% 741,756 BDI06/E13: Integrated Early Childhood Development UNICEF 336, ,000 0% 336,000 BDI06/E14: Nonformal Education for Adolescents UNICEF 504, ,000 0% 504,000 Subtotal for EDUCATION 21,872,340 24,981,716 7,393,274 30% 17,588,442 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 34

41 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 4 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ FOOD BDI06/F01: Food aid for relief and recovery in the Great Lakes Region (requirements for the Burundi component are appealed for as part of Great Lakes Regional Consolidated Appeal) WFP 0% Subtotal for FOOD 0% The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 35

42 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 5 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ HEALTH BDI06/H01: Malnutrition management UNICEF 1,128,680 1,128,680 0% 1,128,680 BDI06/H02: Improved Nutritional Surveillance and Coordination UNICEF 336, , ,000 30% 236,000 BDI06/H03: HIV/AIDS Prevention for Vulnerable Populations ABS 224,020 0% BDI06/H04: Access to Healthcare for Vulnerable People in Ngozi Province HI/France 370, ,000 0% 190,000 BDI06/H05: Access to Care for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Ngozi and Gitega Provinces BDI06/H06A: Increase Access to Essential Health Care Package (ECP) HI/France 736, ,000 0% 372,000 UNHCR 1,371,680 0% BDI06/H06B: Increase Access to Essential Health Care Package (ECP) UNICEF 2,944,375 2,945,538 0% 2,945,538 BDI06/H06C: Increase Access to Essential Health Care Package (ECP) WHO 1,787,839 1,345,112 1,083,375 81% 261,737 BDI06/H06D: Increase Access to Essential Health Care Package (ECP) UNFPA 1,113,000 1,116,000 0% 1,116,000 BDI06/H07A: ECPPLUS: Sexual and Genderbased Violence (SGBV) Prevention BDI06/H07B: ECPPLUS: Sexual and Genderbased Violence (SGBV) Prevention BDI06/H07C: ECPPLUS: Sexual and Genderbased Violence (SGBV) Prevention BDI06/H07D: ECPPLUS: Sexual and Genderbased Violence (SGBV) Prevention BDI06/H08A: Malaria Treatment and Prevention UNICEF 482, ,000 0% 482,000 UNFPA 453, ,750 0% 453,750 WHO 192, ,479 0% 192,479 UNIFEM 266, ,000 0% 266,000 UNICEF 1,103,799 1,103,799 0% 1,103,799 BDI06/H08B: Malaria Treatment and Prevention WHO 197, ,200 0% 197,200 BDI06/H09A: Response to Health Epidemics and Disease Control WHO 962, , ,020 32% 656,780 BDI06/H09B: Response to Health Epidemics and Disease Control UNICEF 990, ,285 0% 990,285 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 36

43 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 6 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ HEALTH BDI06/H10: Health and Rights of Vulnerable Young People UNFPA 888, ,000 0% 888,000 BDI06/H11: Prevention of HIV/AIDS MothertoChild Transmission UNICEF 528, ,080 0% 528,080 BDI06/H12: Expanded Programme of Immunisation (EPI) UNICEF 2,205,056 2,205,056 0% 2,205,056 BDI06/H13: Maternal and Newborn Healthcare UNICEF 753, ,480 0% 753,480 BDI06/H14: Strengthening Coordination in the Health Sector WHO 302, , ,000 50% 152,400 BDI06/H15: Decentralised support to MoH (Coordination in the Health Sector) in Burundi WHO 235,400 0% 235,400 Subtotal for HEALTH 19,336,923 16,994,059 1,639,395 10% 15,354,664 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 37

44 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 7 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ MINE ACTION BDI06/MA01: Humanitarian Mine Action in Burundi Danchurchaid 1,420,000 1,420,000 0% 1,420,000 BDI06/MA02: Mine Risk Education (MRE) HI B 310, ,000 0% 310,000 BDI06/MA03: Mine Victim Assistance in Burundi HI B 178, ,000 0% 178,000 BDI06/MA04A: Technical Assistance and Capacity Development Services to the National Humanitarian Mine Action Programme in Burundi UNMAS 454, ,825 0% 454,825 BDI06/MA04B: Technical Assistance and Capacity Development Services to the National Humanitarian Mine Action Programme in Burundi UNDP 454, ,825 0% 454,825 BDI06/MA05: Advocacy for the Implementation of the MineBan Treaty Provisions and the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities BDI06/MA06: Support to Development of a National Rapid Response Capacity (Technical Survey and Landmine/ERW Clearance) CENAP 69,500 69,500 0% 69,500 UNMAS 570, , ,665 97% 16,985 BDI06/MA07: Support to local Associations of Disabled Persons UPHB 75,000 75,000 0% 75,000 BDI06/MA08: Support for Expanded CommunityBased Mine Risk Education UNICEF 397, ,600 0% 397,600 Subtotal for MINE ACTION 3,930,400 3,930, ,665 14% 3,376,735 MULTISECTOR BDI06/MS01; MS02: Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Rintegration of Burundian Refugees BDI06/MS02: Repatriation and Reintegration of Burundian Refugees (integrated in BDI06/MS01) UNHCR 35,862,482 30,330,985 30,330, % UNHCR 0% BDI06/MS03: Repatriation and Reintegration of Congolese (DRC) Refugees UNHCR 574, ,211 0% 574,211 BDI06/MS04: Camp Management for Rwandan asylum seekers (RAS) and Congolese refugees / capacity building NRC 225,370 0% 225,370 Subtotal for MULTISECTOR 36,436,693 31,130,566 30,330,985 97% 799,581 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 38

45 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 8 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW BDI06/P/HR/RL01: Community Peace and Reconciliation and Education for Tolerance BDI06/P/HR/RL02: Youth Information and Education Programme CIRID 195, ,199 0% 195,199 JVSF 81,000 40,000 0% 40,000 BDI06/P/HR/RL03: Protection Services for Victims of Sexual Violence NNA 259, ,880 0% 259,880 BDI06/P/HR/RL04: Counselling and Legal Assistance for IDPs and Returning Refugees BDI06/P/HR/RL05: Human rights promotion and protection NRC 290, ,000 0% 290,000 OHCHR 1,313,030 1,313, ,000 12% 1,153,030 BDI06/P/HR/RL06: Enhance awareness, knowledge and understanding of human rights OHCHR 451, ,000 38,796 14% 229,204 BDI06/P/HR/RL07: Harmonisation of national legislation with the international human rights norms and establishment of transitional justice mechanisms BDI06/P/HR/RL08: Enhancing of promotion and human rights protection capacities in the judicial administration BDI06/P/HR/RL09: Peace Education and Community Reconciliation in Burundi OHCHR 375, , , % (24,912) OHCHR 212, , ,494 92% 17,946 UNESCO 3,305,250 3,305,250 0% 3,305,250 BDI06/P/HR/RL10: Harmonisation of national legislation with the international legal framework (UN Action Plan, Nairobi Protocol and Great Lakes) and dissemination of arm regulation documents UNDP 230, ,000 0% 145,000 BDI06/P/HR/RL11: Creation of a national arm register UNDP 170, ,000 0% 170,000 BDI06/P/HR/RL12: Public awareness campaign to emphasise the importance of small arms reduction and control for the restoration of community life and sustained economic recovery UNDP 177, ,000 0% 132,000 Subtotal for PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW 7,060,211 6,705, ,290 12% 5,912,597 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 39

46 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 9 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED BDI06/UNDP: Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector UNDP 0% 1,261,425 BDI06/Unearmarked: Unearmarked funding; awaiting allocation to specific agencies and projects UN Agencies 0% 779,479 BDI06/UNHCR: Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector UNHCR 0% 1,256,281 BDI06/UNICEF: Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector UNICEF 5,831,119 0% (5,831,119) 700,000 Subtotal for SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED 5,831,119 0% (5,831,119) 3,997,185 SHELTER AND NONFOOD ITEMS BDI06/S/NF01: Distribution and Coordination of Nonfood Items Emergency Assistance BDI06/S/NF02: Family Shelter Provision CRS 310, ,000 0% 310,000 NRC 2,200,000 2,200,000 0% 2,200,000 BDI06/S/NF03: Emergency Relief and Response UNICEF 1,139,022 1,139,022 0% 1,139,022 Subtotal for SHELTER AND NONFOOD ITEMS 3,649,022 3,649,022 0% 3,649,022 The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 40

47 BURUNDI Table III: Burundi 2006 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 10 of 10 Project Code: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ WATER AND SANITATION BDI06/WS01: Promotion of Water, Hygiene and Sanitation in Bubanza Province BDI06/WS02: Safe Water Provision in Karuzi Province ACF 400, ,000 0% 400,000 CISV 320,000 78,200 0% 78,200 BDI06/WS03: Water and Sanitation in Giharo Commune CORD 269, ,054 0% 269,054 BDI06/WS04: Rehabilitation of Rural Water Systems in Gitega Province ODAG 219, ,912 0% 219,912 BDI06/WS05: Provision of Safe Water in Mugamba, Bururi Province OA 446, ,000 0% 446,000 BDI06/WS06: Improved Access to Safe Water, Basic Hygiene and Sanitation UNICEF 2,717,680 2,717, ,838 9% 2,475,842 BDI06/WS07: WatSan programme provinces Bururi, Cankuzo, Muramvya, Bujumbura rural Solidarités 821,567 0% 821,567 Subtotal for WATER AND SANITATION 4,372,646 4,952, ,838 5% 4,710,575 Grand Total 129,407, ,800,086 53,471,169 45% 64,328,917 4,097,185 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carryover Pledge: Commitment: Contribution: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 41

48 BURUNDI Table IV: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects listed in the Appeal, by Donor as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 1 of 4 Channel Project Code Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNHCR UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Rintegration 6,400,566 of Burundian Refugees[REPRESENTS CURRENT ALLOCATION BY UNHCR FROM UNEARMARKED OR BROADLY EARMARKED CONTRIBUTIONS] Subtotal for Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNHCR 6,400,566 Austria OHCHR BDI06/P/HR/RL06 Enhance awareness, knowledge and understanding of human rights 38,796 Subtotal for Austria 38,796 Belgium FAO BDI06/A10 ReLaunching of Smallscale Fishing Activities 499,979 FAO BDI06/A13 Emergency Agricultural Assistance to Disasteraffected Rural Populations 1,000,000 FAO BDI06/A14 Integrated Communitybased Food Security and Nutrition 296,930 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 1,256,281 of Burundian refugees UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 627,889 Subtotal for Belgium 3,681,079 Burundi UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 440 of Burundian Refugees Subtotal for Burundi 440 Central Emergency Response Fund FAO BDI06/A07 CERF allocation to project 300,000 FAO BDI06/A11 CERF allocation to project 300,000 UN Agencies BDI06/Unearmarked CERF allocation to project 779,479 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 CERF allocation to project 325,195 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 CERF allocation to project 699,955 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 CERF allocation to project 920,521 WHO BDI06/H06C CERF allocation to project 1,083,375 WHO BDI06/H09A CERF allocation to project 306,020 Subtotal for Central Emergency Response Fund 3,935, ,479 * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 42

49 BURUNDI Table IV: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects listed in the Appeal, by Donor as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 2 of 4 Channel Project Code Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ Denmark OHCHR BDI06/P/HR/RL05 Human rights promotion and protection 160,000 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 859,107 of Burundian refugees Subtotal for Denmark 1,019,107 European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office FAO BDI06/A11 Distribution of diseasefree cassava cuttings and diversification of other rootcrops 1,252,620 (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01004) UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Rintegration 1,106,599 of Burundian Refugees[ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01000] UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Repatriation and reintegration of Burundian 1,777,251 refugees(echo/bdi/bud/2006/01001) UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF to be allocated by agency to specific sector/project (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01002) 823,082 UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector [ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01005] 1,024,904 UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/ ,084,187 additional commitment of 15 Sepember 2006) Subtotal for European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office 7,068,643 Finland UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 1,275,510 of Burundian Refugees UNHCR BDI06/UNHCR Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 1,256,281 Subtotal for Finland 1,275,510 1,256,281 France UNICEF BDI06/WS06 School WES project 241,838 Subtotal for France 241,838 Germany OHCHR BDI06/P/HR/RL08 Enhancing of promotion and human rights protection capacities in the judicial 194,494 administration UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Assistance and protection activities (GF BDI 02/06) 765,306 Subtotal for Germany 959,800 * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 43

50 BURUNDI Table IV: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects listed in the Appeal, by Donor as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 3 of 4 Channel Project Code Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ Greece UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 47,337 of Burundian Refugees Subtotal for Greece 47,337 Ireland UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Rintegration 380,711 of Burundian Refugees UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 592,415 Subtotal for Ireland 973,126 Japan UNDP BDI06/ER/I03 Reintegration, rehabilitation and poverty reduction programme 978,789 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 2,000,000 of Burundian refugees UNICEF BDI06/E06A Primary education in Burundi 7,267,030 UNMAS BDI06/MA06 Support to Development of a National Rapid Response Capacity (Technical 553,665 Survey and Landmine/ERW Clearance) Subtotal for Japan 10,799,484 Netherlands OCHA BDI06/CSS01 Coordination of Humanitarian Activities 482,000 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 1,205,000 of Burundian Refugees UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 723,000 Subtotal for Netherlands 2,410,000 Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries Fund UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 75,000 of Burundian refugees Subtotal for Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries Fund 75,000 Private (individual donations) UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and assistance for refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 8,622 of Burundian refugees Subtotal for Private (individual donations) 8,622 * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 44

51 BURUNDI Table IV: Consolidated Appeal for Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects listed in the Appeal, by Donor as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 4 of 4 Channel Project Code Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ Sweden FAO BDI06/A13 Emergency Agricultural Assistance to Disasteraffected Rural Populations 1,291,440 OCHA BDI06/CSS01 Coordination of humanitarian activities 135,845 UNDP BDI06/UNDP Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 1,261,425 UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 878,290 Subtotal for Sweden 2,305,575 1,261,425 Switzerland UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 972,213 of Burundian Refugees Subtotal for Switzerland 972,213 UNICEF National Committee/Belgium UNICEF BDI06/E12 Reintegration of child soldiers 126,244 UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF to be allocated to specific sector/project 77,352 Subtotal for UNICEF National Committee/Belgium 203,596 United Kingdom OHCHR BDI06/P/HR/RL07 Harmonisation of national legislation with the international human rights norms 400,000 and establishment of transitional justice mechanisms Subtotal for United Kingdom 400,000 United States of America FAO BDI06/A10 ReLaunching of Smallscale Fishing Activities 150,000 OCHA BDI06/CSS01 Coordination of Humanitarian Activities 100,000 UNHCR BDI06/MS01; MS02 Protection and Assistance for Refugees in Burundi; Repatriation and Reintegration 10,255,371 of Burundian Refugees UNICEF BDI06/H02 Improved Nutritional Surveillance and Coordination 100,000 UNICEF BDI06/UNICEF Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector 700,000 WHO BDI06/H14 Strengthening Coordination in the Health Sector 150,000 Subtotal for United States of America 10,655, ,000 Grand Total 53,471,169 4,097,185 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 45

52 BURUNDI Table V: Burundi 2006 Total Funding per Donor (to projects listed in the Appeal) (carry over not included) as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations Donor Funding % of Grand Total Uncommitted pledges Values in US$ Japan 10,799, % United States 10,655, % 800,000 European Commission (ECHO) 7,068, % Allocations of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 6,400, % Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) 3,935, % 779,479 Belgium 3,681, % Netherlands 2,410, % Sweden 2,305, % 1,261,425 Finland 1,275, % 1,256,281 Denmark 1,019, % Ireland 973, % Switzerland 972, % Germany 959, % United Kingdom 400, % France 241, % Private (individuals & organisations) 212, % OPEC Fund 75, % Greece 47, % Austria 38, % Burundi % Grand Total 53,471, % 4,097,185 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: Commitment: Contribution: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. * includes contributions to the Consolidated Appeal and additional contributions outside of the Consolidated Appeal Process (bilateral, Red Cross, etc...) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 46

53 BURUNDI Table VI: Other Humanitarian Funding to Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects not listed in the Appeal as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 1 of 3 Channel Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ Belgium CARITAS Humanitarian assistance 753,342 MDM Improving the living condition of the vulnerable population 510,204 TEARFUND Rehabilitation of housing and distribution of agricultural inputs 776,923 Subtotal for Belgium 2,040,469 Central Emergency Response Fund WHO CERF allocation to project 134,781 Subtotal for Central Emergency Response Fund 134,781 Denmark ADRA Denmark Support to reintegration of returning refugees in the Makamba province, Burundi 730,287 Subtotal for Denmark 730,287 European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office ACFFrance Programme intgr de prvention et de lutte contre la malnutrition dans les provinces de Kayanza, 1,648,241 Ngozi et Ruyigi (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01010) CARITAS Cash for work and resilience programme 349,246 (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01014) CARITAS Cash for work et innovations en milieu rural (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01017) 394,567 CARITAS Seeds for IDPs and vulnerable in Burundi (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01006) 1,059,398 CORDAID Appui la province sanitaire de Makamba et aux communes de Burambi, Buyengero et Rumonge 701,531 en province de Bururi (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01016) GVC Projet d appui au rseau sanitaire des secteurs d Isale, Kabezi et Rwibaga, de prparation au 1,768,320 systme de l autonomie de gestion et renforcement de la rponse la malnutrition modre et aigue dans Bujumbura Rurale (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01011) ICRC ICRC protection activities in Burundi 376,884 (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01012) IRC Musasa site pumping system for Rwandan Asylum seekers (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01008) 216,660 MSF, Netherlands Improved access to and quality of basic health care with special attention to the most vulnerable 591,716 groups, Ruyigi and Kayanza Province(ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01007) MSF/Belgium Programme mdical dans la province de Karuzi; Accs aux soins sant pour la population de la 956,633 province grce au soutien des 10 (et peuttre 12) centres de sant publics et du seul hpital de rfrence (Buhiga)[ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01009] Solidarités Programme eau et assainissement dans les provinces de Bujumbura Rural, Gitega, Bururi et 816,583 Cankuzo, Muramvya et Mwaro (ECHO/BDI/BUD/2006/01013) Subtotal for European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office 8,879,779 * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 47

54 BURUNDI Table VI: Other Humanitarian Funding to Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects not listed in the Appeal as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 2 of 3 Channel Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ Germany Bilateral School feeding programme 50,000 GAA (DWH) Food aid 794,453 GTZ Food aid beside the food security programme 414,692 RC/Germany Distribution of NFIs 234,615 Subtotal for Germany 1,493,760 Ireland MSF Basic health care 372,671 MSF Medical support 434,783 Subtotal for Ireland 807,454 Norway Flyktningehjelpen Camp Management (BDI ) 223,509 Flyktningehjelpen Shelter (BDI ) 2,889,771 NPA Burundian refugees in Tanzania (BDI ) 1,327,434 Subtotal for Norway 4,440,714 Sweden ICRC Humanitarian support through ICRC 373,235 SCG Humanitarian support to programme for peace and reconciliation 736,038 Subtotal for Sweden 1,109,273 Switzerland Maison Shalom Ruyigi Swiss dairy products 111,462 OCHA Radio Tuyage Twongere 64,516 SDC/SHA FSD: humanitarian demining ,385 SDC/SHA Swiss Dairy Products 112,645 Subtotal for Switzerland 540,008 * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 48

55 BURUNDI Table VI: Other Humanitarian Funding to Burundi 2006 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects not listed in the Appeal as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Page 3 of 3 Channel Description Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ United States of America ACF Water and sanitation 375,000 American RC Health, water and sanitation for Burundian and Congolese refugees 598,982 CARE INT Environmental protection for Burundian refugees 20,000 CARE INT Genderbased violence 295,390 CRS Food security and agriculture 701,860 IARC Food security and agriculture 300,000 IFRC Water and sanitation 332,510 IMC Health, nutrition, food security and agriculture 622,478 IRC Genderbased violence, water and sanitation 1,048,230 IRC Multisectoral assistance for Burundian refugees 1,603,772 NPA Genderbased violence 103,668 PADCO Communitybased reintegration 6,318,937 USAIDOFDA Administrative support 366,418 Voice of America Education and radio 187,180 World Relief Infrastructure 573,492 Subtotal for United States of America 13,447,917 Grand Total 33,624,442 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. * Value of contribution not specified ** Estimated value The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 49

56 BURUNDI Table VII: Burundi 2006 Total Humanitarian Assistance per Donor (Appeal plus other*)(carry over not included) as of 15 November Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations Donor Funding % of Grand Total Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ United States 24,103, % 800,000 European Commission (ECHO) 15,948, % Japan 10,799, % Allocations of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 6,400, % Belgium 5,721, % Norway 4,440, % Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) 4,069, % 779,479 Sweden 3,414, % 1,261,425 Germany 2,453, % Netherlands 2,410, % Ireland 1,780, % Denmark 1,749, % Switzerland 1,512, % Finland 1,275, % 1,256,281 United Kingdom 400, % France 241, % Private (individuals & organisations) 212, % OPEC Fund 75, % Greece 47, % Austria 38, % Burundi % Grand Total 87,095, % 4,097,185 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: Commitment: a nonbinding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of inkind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. * includes contributions to the Consolidated Appeal and additional contributions outside of the Consolidated Appeal Process (bilateral, Red Cross, etc...) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service ( 50

57 BURUNDI ANNEX III. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACF ARS APADE BINUB BPS BRC BURMACC CA CAP CERF CHAP CISV COPED CORD CRS DCA DRC ERW FAO FFT FFW FNL FSD GoB GTZ GVC HIV/AIDS IASC ICRC IDP IMCI IRC Kcal Km NACC NFI NGOs NRC OCHA OHCHR PBC PRSP SAPSSA SHA Action Contre la Faim Area Rehabilitation Scheme Association pour la Paix et le Développement United Nations Integrated Offices in Burundi Bureau Provincial de Santé Burundian Red Cross Burundi Mine Action Coordination Centre Consolidated Appeal Consolidated Appeal Process Central Emergency Response Fund Common Humanitarian Action Plan Communita Impregno Servizio Volontariato Conseil pour l Education et le Développement Catholic Organisation for Relief and Development Catholic Relief Services Danish ChurchAid Democratic Republic of the Congo Explosive Remnants of War Food and Agriculture Organization FoodForTraining FoodForWork Forces Nationales pour la Liberation Fondation Suisse de Déminage Government of Burundi Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit Gruppo Volontariato Civile Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Inter Agency Standing Committee International Committee of the Red Cross Internally Displaced Person Integrated Management Childhood Illness International Rescue Committee Kilo calories Kilometres National Aid Coordination Committee NonFood Item NonGovernmental Organisations Norwegian Refugee Council Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Peace Building Commission Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Food security early warning and control system Suspected Hazardous Areas 51

58 BURUNDI UN UNDP UNFPA UNHCR UNICEF WFP WHO WOI WV United Nations United Nations Development Programme United Nations Population Fund United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees United Nations Children s Fund World Food Programme World Health Organization World Outreach Initiative World Vision 52

59 NOTES:

60

61 Consolidated Appeal Feedback Sheet If you would like to comment on this document please do so below and fax this sheet to (Attn: CAP Section) or scan it and us: CAP@ReliefWeb.int Comments reaching us before 28 February 2007 will help us improve the CAP in time for Thank you very much for your time. Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) Section, OCHA Please write the name of the Consolidated Appeal on which you are commenting: 1. What did you think of the review of 2006? How could it be improved? 2. Is the context and prioritised humanitarian need clearly presented? How could it be improved? 3. To what extent do response plans address humanitarian needs? How could it be improved? 4. To what extent are roles and coordination mechanisms clearly presented? How could it be improved? 5. To what extent are budgets realistic and in line with the proposed actions? How could it be improved? 6. Is the presentation of the document layout and format clear and well written? How could it be improved? Please make any additional comments on another sheet or by . Name: Title & Organisation: Address:

62 OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) UNITED NATIONS PALAIS DES NATIONS NEW YORK, N.Y GENEVA 10 USA SWITZERLAND