IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No /08. Date heard: 10 December Date of judgment: 12 December 2008
|
|
- Cynthia Goodman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No /08 Date heard: 10 December 2008 Date of judgment: 12 December 2008 In the matter between: AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE FIRST DEFENDANT (ASSOCIATION INC. UNDER SECTION 21) THE CHAIRPERSON ELECTORAL COMMISSION SECOND DEFENDANT THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER ELECTORAL COMMISSION THIRD RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DU PLESSIS J: [1] The applicant, the African National Congress (ANC), is the majority and ruling political party in South Africa. During the latter months of this year.
2 members of the ANC left the party and formed a new one The new party chose for rtself the name Congress of the People. wrth the abbreviated name Cope. This new political party is the first respondent in this application and I shall refer to it as Cope. [2] Cope has applied in terms of the Electoral Commission Act 51 of 1996 (the Act) to register as a political party under the said name with the said abbreviation. The party's formal launch is scheduled for next Tuesday 16 December 2008 [3] The ANC now applies urgently for an interdict to restrain Cope from using the name Congress of the People as its name and/or from persisting with its application under the Act to register as a poliiical party under that name. Cope opposes the application and it is in the interest of justice and of certainty that the issue be resolved before Cope's formal launch. [4] The chairperson of the electoral commission estabiished under the Act is the second respondent and the chief electoral officer (CEO) is the third respondent Initially the ANC also sought an order restraining the CEO, pending the finalisation of this application, from making any decision on Cope's application for registration under the Act. The ANC does not persist in seeking such an order. Consequently, the CEO. who gave notice of her
3 intention to oppose the application. did not persist in the opposition. Both the CEO and the second respondent abide the decision of this court. [5] The ANC's objection to Cope's use of the name Congress of the People stems from the historical Congress of the People that took place in June That Congress of the People adopted the Freedom Charter. The Freedom Charter is one of the most important documents in the history of this country. For some it is the most important document in the history of this country. In it are embodied principles for which those who took part in the liberation struggle fought and suffered. Principles of the Freedom Charter underlie the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa [6] Although the parties differ as to some nuances, the essential historic events that led to the Congress of the People in 1955 are not in dispute. After the National Party with its policy of apartheid came into power in the liberation struggle intensified. The ANC was an important role player in the struggle. Its allies in the struggle included the South African Indian Congress. The South African Coloured People's Organisation and the South African Congress of Democrats. These organisations became known as the Congress Alliance with which the South African Congress of Trade Union also associated itself later on. Over a period of time the Congress Alliance, through the members of its constituent organisations promoted the idea of a Freedom Charter and gathered views and input across the country. These activities culminated in the Congress of the People that was held in Kliptown
4 on 26 and 27 June Although the police disrupted the Congress. it was able to adopt the Freedom Charter. In due course the constituent organisations of the Congress Alliance individually adopted the Freedom Charter. The ANC is the only one of the constituent organisations that still exists. [7] Before I deal with the ANC's contentions, it is perhaps useful to state what this case is not about. First, the ANC does not contend that it has any proprietary or similar real rights in the name Congress of the People. In the second place, while the historic event and its name, being part of the history of this country, belong to all the people of South Africa, the ANC does not contend that use of the name Congress of the People is for that reason per se unlawfut. Put differently, the ANC does not contend that simply because Congress of the People refers to an important historic event. people and organisations are not free to appropriate the name. [8] Counsel for the ANC contended that Cope's use of the name Congress of the People constitutes the delict of unlawful competition. That is so, counsel contended, because Cope's use of the name conveys to the public a false message through which Cope will unfairly attract votes to the detriment of rival political parties. It will in particular cause harm to the ANC because the 1955 Congress of the People lives in the hearts and minds of the people
5 and. due to its involvement in the historic event, forms an integral part of the goodwill that the ANC has. [9] Counsel were, rightly in my view, agreed that the law of unlawful competition applies to political parties: a political party may not employ unlawful means to attract votes. (See as to the applicability of the law of unlawful competition outside the filed of commerce. Van Heerden & Neethling, Unlawful Competition (2" ed.) p. 2; We have also been referred to Pan Africanist Congress of Azania v Thami Ka Plaatjie and Others (unreported OPD Case no. 5173/2008)) Similar principles have been applied in the United Kingdom and in the United States of America in regard to competition in the political field. (We were referred to Burge v Haycock [2002] R.P.C 553 (CA); Tomei v Finley 512 F.Supp 695 (1981); United We Stand America, Inc. v United We Stand. America New York, Inc, 128 F.3d 86 (1997); Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (Prd) Seccional Metropolitana De Washington-DC v Partido Revolucionario Dominicano. Seccional De Maryland Y Virginia 312 F. Supp. 2d 1 (2004)) [10] The essential foundation of the ANC's contention is that, by appropriating the name Congress of the People. Cope is conveying a false message to the voters of South Africa. It may be accepted that if. by using a particular name, a political party deliberately conveys a false message to the voters it
6 will be competing unlawfully. Therefore, the first question is whether, purely by its use of the name Congress of the People, Cope is conveying to the voters a false message. In order to determine whether the use of the name conveys a message and whether that message is false, the court must view it from the perspective of a reasonable voter who is reasonably informed. [11] In its founding papers the ANC contends that by using the name Congress of the People, Cope is misrepresenting itself as being the 1955 Congress of the People or as exclusively being entitled to be associated with and identified by that name. [12] In my view the mere use of the name Congress of the People does not convey that Cope actually is the 1955 Congress of the People. No reasonable voter, even those with but a passing knowledge of the relevant history, will think that Cope, a party established in 2008, is the event that took place in Those thai have no knowledge of the history will not be deceived because they will not know that the term Congress of the People might refer to a historic event. [13] The facts before us show that Cope indeed intends to campaign on the basis that it seeks to uphold the principles of the Freedom Charter. Bearing that in mind, the reasonable voter with knowledge of the relevant history will in my view infer that that may be a reason why Cope calls itself the Congress of the People. In that sense the use of the name Congress of the
7 People conveys a message that Cope associates itself and wishes voters to associate it with the Congress of the People as the birthplace of the Freedom Charter. That is not a misrepresentation, however. The electorate will in time pass judgment as to whether Cope lives up to the ideals of the Freedom Charter, but there is no basis for holding that it does not intend to do so. I shall return to the question of exclusivity, but in my view the mere use of the name Congress of the People does not convey that Cope has any exclusive claim to the 1955 event or to the Freedom Charter. [14] The ANC further contends that by choosing the name Congress of the People. Cope is misrepresenting that it is the sole heir and upholder of the ideals that originated from the 1955 Congress. While I accept that Cope. like the people of South Africa in general. regards itself as an heir of ideals that originated from the 1955 event, I do not hold that by using the name Cope conveys that it is the sole heir. [15] Mr Ginsberg pointed out, correctly, that in terms of section 16(1)(b) of the Act Cope will, once registered as a political party under that name. be entitled exclusively to use the name Congress of the People as a name for a political party. That. counsel submitted, will in the long term result in people identifying only Cope with the 1955 Congress of the People. I tend to agree with Mr Puckrin for Cope that we are called upon to judge the case on the facts as they stand today and not as they might stand in the future. In any
8 event. I do not agree that people will in the future forget the history to the extent that they will identify a party that was founded in 2008 with an event that took place more than 50 years before that. I should perhaps add that the exclusivity under the Act will not preclude lawful references by name to the 1955 event. [16] It is concluded that Cope's use of the name Congress of the People does not convey a false message. For that reason Copes use of the name does not amount to unlawful competition. It is unnecessary to consider the arguments pertaining to the other elements of the delict of unlawful competition. [17] Both the parties were represented by senior and junior counsel and have accepted that the costs of two counsel are warranted. In the result the following order is made The application is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel. I agree BR DU PLESSIS JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT BM NGOEPE JUDGE PRESIDENT OF THE HIGH COURT I agree
9 JB SHONGWE DEPUTY JUDGE PRESIDENT OF THE HIGH COURT Applicant's Legal Representation: ADAMS & ADAMS ADAMS & ADAMS PLACE 1140 PROSPECT STREET HATFIELD PRETORIA REF: L36790/MR CK JOB/MS K THOMPSON 1 st Respondent's Legal Representation: BOUWERS INC 6 ALBURY OFFICE PARK CNR. ALBURY ROAD & JAN SMUTS AVENUE HYDE PARK JOHANNESBURG REF: MR DEON BOUWER 2 nd Respondent's Legal Representatïon: BOWMAN GILFILLAN INC 165 WEST STREET SANDTON REF: MR ANOREW SMITH/JN/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM (PTY) LTD PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED
UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No: 28738/2006 Date heard: 25 & 26 /10/2007 Date of judgment: 12/05/2008 LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM
More informationUnderstanding issues of race and class in Election 09. Justin Sylvester. Introduction
1 Understanding issues of race and class in Election 09 Justin Sylvester Introduction As South Africans head to the polls in less than four weeks, there has been a great deal of consideration on the issue
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) Case No: 8550/09 Date heard: 06/08/2009 Date of judgment: 11/08/2009 In the matter between: Pikoli, Vusumzi Patrick Applicant and The President
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 11/01 IN RE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MPUMALANGA PETITIONS BILL, 2000 Heard on : 16 August 2001 Decided on : 5 October 2001 JUDGMENT LANGA DP: Introduction
More information[1] This is an opposed application in terms of section 51(9) of the Patents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: Case No: Patent 2001/3937 B BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG B BRAUN MEDICAL (PTY) L TO First Applicant Second Applicant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) GOLDEN FRIED CHICKEN (PTY) LTD JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) NOT REPORTABLE Date: 2009-01-30 Case Number: 23619/2007 In the matter between: GOLDEN FRIED CHICKEN (PTY) LTD Applicant and SOULSA CC Respondent
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 55/16 In the matter between: ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA Applicant and SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY CHAIRPERSON OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PROVINCES
More informationSUBMISSIONS ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 45B(1C) OF FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE AMENDMENT BILL
20 January 2016 The Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Finance c/o The Committee Secretary Mr Allen Wicomb 3 rd floor 90 Plein Street CAPE TOWN 8000 Doc Ref: Your ref: Direct : (011) 645 6704 E-
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 30037/2015 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED... DATE...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO:83409/2015 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: J 965/18 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION ( SAMWU ) Applicant and MXOLISI QINA MILTON MYOLWA SIVIWE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) not reportable Case No: 19718 / 2003 Date heard: 23&24/ 02/ 2006 Date of judgment: 21/ 04/2006 In the matter between: OTHERCHOICE (PTY)
More informationANGLOGOLD HEALTH SERVICE (PTY) LTD
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO J1143/99 In the matter between: ANGLOGOLD HEALTH SERVICE (PTY) LTD Applicant and THE NATIONAL UNION OF MINEWORKERS First Respondent THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG In the matter between: CASE NO: 9234/15 MARTIN BRUCE RENKEN IM A RENT COLLECTOR (PTY) LTD FIRST APPLICANT SECOND APPLICANT and
More information±?.M*»t /MM/*- IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) DATE CASE NO: 35343/3063. In the matter between:
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) /MM/*- DATE: CASE NO: 35343/3063 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: ES/NO (3)
More informationNos , , PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. (ffk/a PHILIP MORRIS, INC.) and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., et al. and LORILLARD TOBACCO CO.
Nos. 09-976, 09-977, 09-1012 I J Supreme Court, U.S. F I L E D HAY252910 PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. (ffk/a PHILIP MORRIS, INC.) and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., et al. and LORILLARD TOBACCO CO., V. Petitioners,
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, IN JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Reportable THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, IN JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Case no: J1773/12 In the matter between: VUSI MASHIANE and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Applicant First Respondent
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) CASE NO: 16572/2018 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO IN THE MATIER BETWEEN : SOLIDARITY APPLICANT
More informationEmployer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation
Employer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation Posted on March 17, 2016 Nice when an Employer wins! Here the Court determined that Employers may place reasonable restrictions
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITTING IN DURBAN REPORTABLE CASE NO D71/05 DATE HEARD 2005/02/11 DATE OF JUDGMENT 2005/02/21
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITTING IN DURBAN REPORTABLE CASE NO D71/05 DATE HEARD 2005/02/11 DATE OF JUDGMENT 2005/02/21 In the matter between H W JONKER APPLICANT and OKHAHLAMBA MUNICIPALITY
More informationKENTZ OVERSEAS LTD APPLICANT. G A McGILLAN RESPONDENT JUDGMENT
IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: 11384/2010 In the matter between: KENTZ OVERSEAS LTD APPLICANT and G A McGILLAN RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Date: 12 November 2011 PLOOS
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case Nos: 1233/2017 and 1268/2017 THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA
In the matters between: THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case Nos: 1233/2017 and 1268/2017 THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLANT and THE CAPE PARTY RESPONDENT
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, In the matter between: HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case no: J 1524/17 SOUTH AFRICAN CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION ( SACWU ) MOSEHLE PETRUS MAMPHO First Applicant
More informationAFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 54 TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE NOMINATION PROCESS
AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 54 TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE NOMINATION PROCESS AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 54 TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE NOMINATION PROCESS BGMs 1. BGMs to be chaired by the Chairperson of the branch.
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
Of interest to other Judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, In the matter between: HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case no: J1746/18 JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN BUS SERVICES SOC LTD Applicant and DEMOCRATIC MUNCIPAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY
Reportable: YES/ NO Circulate to Judges: YES/ NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/ NO Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES/ NO In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MEC: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC SCHOON GODWILLY MAHUMANI
+ THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between THE MEC: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND TOURISM: CASE NO: 478/03 Reportable NORTHERN PROVINCE APPELLANT and SCHOON GODWILLY
More informationCase No. 265/89. and CANDY WORLD (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED. Judgment by: NESTADT JA
Case No. 265/89 MARS INCORPORATED APPELLANT and CANDY WORLD (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED RESPONDENT Judgment by: NESTADT JA Case No 265/89 /CCC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LAUTREC CORPORATION, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. ROBERT JAMES d/b/a Your Gemologist, LLC, and International School of Gemology, Defendant.
More informationCASE NO.:( QQ COMBINED SUMMONS IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG. ln the matter between:
COMBINED SUMMONS IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO.:( QQ ln the matter between: THOMAS SWABIHI MOYANE J ONAS MAKWAKW A First Plaintiff Second Plaintiff Third
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT RIVERSDALE MINING LIMITED
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: 536/2016 In the matter between: RIVERSDALE MINING LIMITED APPELLANT and JOHANNES JURGENS DU PLESSIS CHRISTO M ELOFF SC FIRST RESPONDENT
More information1 st Applicant. 2 nd to 26 th Applicants. Respondent
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) CASE NUMBER :J954/98 DATE:12.5.1998 In the matter of: FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION BILLY LANZAYE AND 25 OTHERS 1 st Applicant 2 nd to 26 th Applicants
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 38/04 RADIO PRETORIA Applicant versus THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY OF SOUTH AFRICA THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY
More informationCase SWH Doc 72 Filed 06/16/17 Entered 06/16/17 10:30:36 Page 1 of 8
Case 15-00043-8-SWH Doc 72 Filed 06/16/17 Entered 06/16/17 10:30:36 Page 1 of 8 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 16 day of June, 2017. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) ESKOM HOLDINGS (SOC) LIMITED NOTICE OF MOTION: URGENT APPLICATION
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) In the matter between: MATSHELA MOSES KOKO CASE NO: J 200/18 Applicant and ESKOM HOLDINGS (SOC) LIMITED Respondent NOTICE OF MOTION: URGENT APPLICATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGMENT NEDBANK SWAZILAND (PTY) LTD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGMENT Case No. 1898/2017 In the matter between: NEDBANK SWAZILAND (PTY) LTD Applicant AND SYLVIA WILLIAMSON 1 st Respondent SWAZILAND UNION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 179/16 MAMAHULE COMMUNAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION MAMAHULE COMMUNITY MAMAHULE TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY OCCUPIERS OF THE FARM KALKFONTEIN First
More informationEthics Informational Packet COMMUNICATION WITH ADVERSE PARTY. Courtesy of The Florida Bar Ethics Department
Ethics Informational Packet COMMUNICATION WITH ADVERSE PARTY Courtesy of The Florida Bar Ethics Department 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Florida Ethics Opinions Pg. # (Ctrl + Click) OPINION 09-1... 3 OPINION 90-4...
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SUSARA ELIZABETH MAGDALENA JOOSTE SCORE SUPERMARKET TRADING (PTY) LIMITED JUDGMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 15/98 SUSARA ELIZABETH MAGDALENA JOOSTE Applicant versus SCORE SUPERMARKET TRADING (PTY) LIMITED THE MINISTER OF LABOUR Respondent Intervening Party Heard
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MOQHAKA TAXI ASSOCIATION
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Case No. : 3706/2012 MOQHAKA TAXI ASSOCIATION Applicant and MOQHAKA MUNICIPALITY FREE STATE TRANSPORT OPERATING LICENSING
More informationCOURT FOR WHICH CANDIDATE APPLIES: HIGH COURT GAUTENG NORTH AND SOUTH DIVISIONS
CANDIDATE: ADVOCATE NORMAN DAVIS SC COURT FOR WHICH CANDIDATE APPLIES: HIGH COURT GAUTENG NORTH AND SOUTH DIVISIONS 1. The candidate s appropriate qualifications 1.1. The candidate holds the following
More information.. 80\ov\.aoL ~... and. In the matter between: Applicant POWERTECH TRANSFORMERS (PTY) LTD. First Respondent CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case Number: 44499/2017 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE : ~/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:
More informationREVELAS J : IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Held at Johannesburg ) Case. No: J2258/98 In the matter between :
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Held at Johannesburg ) Delete whichever is not applicable: Reportable : yes / no Of interest to other Judges: yes / no Revised 30 April 1999 Signature No: J2258/98
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No 195/97 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter of: GUARDIAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Appellant and MATTHEW STEPHEN CHARLES SEARLE N O Respondent CORAM: VIVIER, HOWIE,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: Case no: 9798/14 THANDEKA SYLVIA MAHLEKWA First Applicant and MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) JOHANNESBURG CITY PARKS ADVOCATE JAFTA MPHAHLANI N.O.
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) In the matter between: CASE NO. JR 1028/06 JOHANNESBURG CITY PARKS Applicant And ADVOCATE JAFTA MPHAHLANI N.O. THE SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha CASE NO. 2268/09 Reportable In the matter between: JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha CASE NO. 2268/09 Reportable In the matter between: MGCINENI GUGA Applicant And MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY THE STATION COMMISIONER MTHATHA
More informationIn the matter between:
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not reportable Case No: JR 2452/10 In the matter between: DUMILE EZEKIA NANA Applicant and MANTSOPA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY SOUTH
More informationNO In the Supreme Court of the United States. RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents.
NO. 06-1226 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of
More informationReport on. The Process of the Substitution of the Death Penalty. October 2002 Funded by: Foundation for Human Rights
Report on The Process of the Substitution of the Death Penalty October 2002 Funded by: Foundation for Human Rights CONTENTS Introduction... 3 The Investigation... 3 Methodology... 3 Background... 4 The
More informationzo/o IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) Case number 76888/2010 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE 1) REPORTABLE: YE&/NO. (2! OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: Y&/NO. (3) REVISED. Case number 76888/2010
More informationOpening Remarks By Ms Colette Clark
Opening Remarks By Ms Colette Clark Ms Colette Clark Acting Director-General of the Department of Public Service and Administration Republic of South Africa at The Senior Officials Technical Consultation
More informationSOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTION ZESN OBSERVER MISSION
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTION ZESN OBSERVER MISSION 2014 Table of Contents Background... 2 The Election Campaign... 3 Legal framework... 4 Electoral system... 5 Registration of political
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
NO. 05-11-01362-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016781058 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 March 16 P12:13 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS AURORA LOAN SERVICES
More informationCase3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)
More informationASID CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
american society of interior designers american society of interior designers american society of interior designers american society of interior designers american society of interior designers american
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA) CASE NO. 1273/08 In the matter between: NKOSIYAZI WELLINGTON MADLAVU Applicant and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY First Respondent THE STATION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No 427/96 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In die matter of: GNH OFFICE AUTOMATION C.C. First Appellant NAUGIS INVESTMENTS C.C. Second Appellant and PROVINCIAL
More informationRESTITUTION OF LAND RIGHTS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA RESTITUTION OF LAND RIGHTS AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly as a section 75 Bill; Bill published in Government Gazette No. 25217 of 25 July 2003) (The English
More information(HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO: D633/11 SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN AND MINING INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD ( SAWIMIH ) JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO: D633/11 In the matter between: NOLUTHANDO LANGENI Applicant and SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN AND MINING INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD ( SAWIMIH
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA PHUMELELA GAMING AND LEISURE LIMITED MEC, FINANCE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, GAUTENG JUDGMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 31/05 PHUMELELA GAMING AND LEISURE LIMITED Applicant versus ANDRÉ GRÜNDLINGH ULRICH OSMUND SCHÜLER THE MINISTER OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY THE NATIONAL GAMBLING
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PLAINTIFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE
More informationIN THE ELECTORAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
1 IN THE ELECTORAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG In the matter between: CASE NUMBER: 011/2016 EC NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY (NFP) Applicant And THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON)
2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON) UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: Case No: 35420 / 03 Date heard: 17 & 21/02/2006 Date of judgment: 4/8/2006 PAUL JACOBUS SMIT PLAINTIFF
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 247/2000 In the matter between BoE Bank Ltd Appellant and Sonja Mathilda Ries Respondent Before: HARMS, SCHUTZ, CAMERON,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT MARK WILLIAM LYNN NO FIRST APPELLANT TINTSWALO ANNAH NANA MAKHUBELE NO SECOND APPELLANT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 687/10 In the matter between: MARK WILLIAM LYNN NO FIRST APPELLANT TINTSWALO ANNAH NANA MAKHUBELE NO SECOND APPELLANT and COLIN HENRY COREEJES
More informationCONFLICTS OF INTEREST ACT
Province of Alberta CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor,
More informationTHE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY
THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY 1 Constitutional Court Justices of South Africa 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE...09 THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH AFRICA...13 1. THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM...23
More informationInfoflow CORPORATE SOCIAL INVESTMENT POLICY
Infoflow CORPORATE SOCIAL INVESTMENT POLICY Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose... 1 Responsibility... 1 Reservation of Company Rights... 1 Revisions... 1 Definitions... 2 BEE... 2 Black People... 2 Policy...
More informationAFRICA ASSEMBLIES OF GOD ALLIANCE Constitution & Bylaws
AFRICA ASSEMBLIES OF GOD ALLIANCE Constitution & Bylaws (As Amended Through March 1, 2013) PREAMBLE Having felt the leading of the Holy Spirit to stand together for the great harvest which we believe is
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. LUC ARTHUR FRANCE CHRETIEN First Appellant CAROL ANNE CHRETIEN Second Appellant
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 52/09 LUC ARTHUR FRANCE CHRETIEN First Appellant CAROL ANNE CHRETIEN Second Appellant and LINDA STEWART BELL Respondent Neutral citation:
More informationMyths and facts of the Venezuelan election system
Myths and facts of the Venezuelan election system Whenever elections are held in Venezuela, local and foreign media and political players launch a campaign to delegitimize the election system and question
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no 332/08 In the matter between: ABSA BROKERS (PTY) LTD Appellant and RMB FINANCIAL SERVICES RMB ASSET MANAGEMENT (PTY) LTD MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION
More informationNot reportable Not of interest to other Judges. First Applicant. Second Applicant. and. First Respondent. Second Respondent.
,. HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Not reportable Not of interest to other Judges CASE NO: 61163/2017 THE SPAR GROUP LIMITED THE SP AR GUILD OF SOUTHERN AFRICA NPC First Applicant
More informationIN THE COURT FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS (FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CIPLA MEDPRO (PTY) LTD H LUNDBECK A/S LUNDBECK SA (PTY) LTD
IN THE COURT FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS (FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) Date: 2010-05-24 In the matter between: Case Number: 89/4476 CIPLA MEDPRO (PTY) LTD Applicant and H LUNDBECK A/S LUNDBECK
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. Greater Louis Trichardt Transitional Local Council
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG Case no. J 644/97 In the matter between: Independent Municipal & Allied Workers Union Applicant AND Greater Louis Trichardt Transitional Local Council
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CITIZENS ALLIANCE FOR JUDGE PAUL R. MATIA SECURE ELECTIONS, et al. CASE NO. 1:04CV2147 Plaintiffs -vs- O R D E R MICHAEL VU, etc.,
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION OF THE CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE Contents Pg Preamble Statement of Fundamental Beliefs Article 1 Name Article 2 Aims and Objectives Article 3 The Character of the COPE Article 4 Membership
More informationREPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017 (Coram: Maraga: CJ & President, Mwilu; DCJ & V-P, Ibrahim, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki & Lenaola, SCJJ) BETWEEN H.E
More informationTHE SUPREMECOURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE SUPREMECOURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: CASE NO: 249/96 PPI MAKELAARS 1ST APPELLANT PIETER D JJACOBS 2ND APPELLANT and THIS PROFESSIONAL PROVIDENT SOCIETY
More informationPOB 9576 Washington, DC (301) February 7, 2011
POB 9576 Washington, DC 20016 (301) 996-6582 February 7, 2011 Raymond N. Hulser Principal Deputy Chief Public Integrity Section Department of Justice Criminal Division 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington,
More informationEISA ELECTION observer mission report
EISA ELECTION observer mission report south Africa Order from: publications@eisa.org.za LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS 3 AUGUST 2016 ISBN 978-1-920446-63-5 9 781920 446635 EISA Election observer Mission Report
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable Case no: J 1499/17 LATOYA SAMANTHA SMITH CHRISTINAH MOKGADI MAHLANE First Applicant Second Applicant and OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE MEMME SEJOSENGWE
More informationNO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-36038, 03/09/2017, ID: 10350631, DktEntry: 26, Page 1 of 24 NO. 16-36038 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE AND JOHN DOES 1-10, individually and on behalf of others similarly
More informationNot reportable 19 March 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
Not reportable 19 March 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA [NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA] In the matter between: CASE NO: 25382/2008 TECMED AFRICA (PTY) LTD Applicant and MINISTER OF HEALTH CANCARE
More informationo( o IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA , (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CASE NUMBER: 37401/09 In the matter between: Plaintiff/Respondent
o( o IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA, (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) (1) REPOHTASLE YcS/HO (2-) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUOG 3^m/NO (3) REVISED CASE NUMBER: 37401/09 In the matter between: FAST AND
More informationCONSTITUTION REV 2. Approved by NOBs 10 October 2015 as delegated by Congress National Committee on 23 August President.
REV 2 Adopted by the Congress National Committee on 23 August 2015 by mandate of the 1 st National Congress (January 2014) and of the Extra-Ordinary National Congress of 12 14 June 2015. Approved by NOBs
More informationRESTITUTION BY EXPROPRIATION OF LAND RIGHTS WHAT ABOUT MARKET VALUE?
RESTITUTION BY EXPROPRIATION OF LAND RIGHTS WHAT ABOUT MARKET VALUE? The Zimbabwe Route? The Issues In very recent Media Release from the Department of Agriculture, the Minister for Agriculture and Land
More informationGHANAIAN UNION OF MANITOBA INC. CONSTITUTION
GHANAIAN UNION OF MANITOBA INC. CONSTITUTION As amended in Winnipeg, Manitoba on 23 rd. November, 2008 PREAMBLE We, members of the Ghanaian Union of Manitoba, recognizing the need for solidarity and a
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI 1 st Applicant 2 nd Applicant And THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 162/10 In the matter between: THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE and SAIRA ESSA PRODUCTIONS CC SAIRA ESSA MARK CORLETT
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE ) n i c r yyv i 0 (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) ;2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YBS/NO. (3) REVISED. / /l \ CASE No. 60892/2011
More informationTHE FIVE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FOURTH ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA ENTITLED THE POLITICAL PARTIES ACT, 2000
THE FIVE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FOURTH ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA ENTITLED THE POLITICAL PARTIES ACT, 2000 AN ACT to revise the statute on political parties to bring the provisions in
More informationTrade Marks Act No 194 of 1993
Trade Marks Act No 194 of 1993 [ASSENTED TO 22 DECEMBER, 1993] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT INLAY 1995] (Afrikaans text signed by the State President) To provide for the registration of trade marks, certification
More informationBRIEF IN OPPOSITION FOR RESPONDENT HARRY NISKA
No. 14-443 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States BONN CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. HARRY NISKA, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
More information1. The First and Second Applicants are employed as an Administration
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG J3797/98 CASE NO: In the matter between ADRIAAN JACOBUS BOTHA ELIZABETH VENTER First Applicant Second Applicant and DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ARTS
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 25/03 MARIE ADRIAANA FOURIE CECELIA JOHANNA BONTHUYS First Applicant Second Applicant versus THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS THE DIRECTOR GENERAL: HOME AFFAIRS
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 41/99 JÜRGEN HARKSEN Appellant versus THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS: CAPE OF GOOD
More informationIN THE ELECTORAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
1 IN THE ELECTORAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG In the application of: CASE NUMBER: 001/2016 EC AARON PASELA MHLOPE JOHANNA XABA JOHN MATONG SELEKE MAMOGADI ALETTA MATLOU JOHANNES KGANG
More informationSuperior Court of California
Superior Court of California County of Orange Case Number : 0--0001-CU-NP-CXC Copy Request: Request Type: Case Documents Prepared for: cns Number of documents: 1 Number of pages: Todd M. Friedman, Esq.-
More information