IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha CASE NO. 2268/09 Reportable In the matter between: JUDGMENT
|
|
- Marshall Chapman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha CASE NO. 2268/09 Reportable In the matter between: MGCINENI GUGA Applicant And MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY THE STATION COMMISIONER MTHATHA CENTRAL POLICE STATION COMMANDING OFFICER VEHICLE SAFE GUARD UNIT, GROUP 46 MTHATHA 1 st Respondent 2 nd Respondent 3 rd Respondent JUDGMENT PAKADE, ADJP.: [1] This application concerns the seizure of the applicant s motor vehicle by the members of the South African Police service in a road block. At the time of its seizure, the motor vehicle, a Toyota Venture with registration letters and number DRH 397 EC, was in the possession of Mr Sinethemba Chaka, a duly licensed authorised driver thereof employed by the applicant. [2] In this application the applicant seeks declaratory orders setting
2 2 aside the seizure of his motor vehicle and the certificate purporting to authorise it issued in terms of s 13(8) of the Police Act 1. The applicant also seeks restraining order interdicting the respondents from further unlawfully seizing the motor vehicle from the possession of the applicant as well as a mandamus that they should release the said motor vehicle to the applicant. [3] If the applicant succeeds on the two declarations the motor vehicle should be returned to the applicant unless the respondents can show that he may not lawfully possess it 2. [4] The respondents oppose this application and have filed of record, an answering affidavit deposed to by Inspector Siyabulela Edward Mtshengu, whom, for the sake of brevity, I shall refer to as ( Mtshengu ). Confirmatory affidavits to Mtshengu s answering affidavit deposed to by Captain Kwezi Kwanini (Kwanini) and senior superintendent Monde Nqadini (Nqadini) were also filed of record. After filing a replying affidavit the applicant successfully brought a joinder application for the purpose of joining Nqandini and by order of this Court issued by Maqubela AJ he was joined as the 4 th respondent in this application. As he was granted leave to do so in the same order Nqadini deposed to an affidavit headed Respondents second answering affidavit. [5] In both answering affidavits the respondents sought to justify the seizure of the applicant s motor vehicle in discharge of the onus which rests on them by relying on the certificate issued by Nqadini in terms of section 13(8) of the Police Act. 1 Act 68 of Section 31(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977(the Act)
3 3 [6] A seizure of property is prima facie unlawful hence to be justified because section 25 of the Constitution 3 protects every person s right to property from being interfered with by seizure or being deprived of his property except where such seizure or deprivation is done in terms of the law of general application. [7] I will return to the defence raised by the respondents in justification of the seizure. It suffices right from the onset to set out the applicant s case as particularised in the founding papers. [8] The applicant is a taxi businessman in Tsolo. He purchased the motor vehicle in question from Mr Thozamile Calaza for the purpose of using it as a taxi. He employed a driver, Mr Sinethemba Chaka, to convey passengers between Tsolo and Maclear. He also contracted with the Tsolo DRC School to convey school children to and from school. [9] After purchasing the motor vehicle, he took it to the Motor Vehicle Theft unit of the South African Police Service for a clearance certificate. That certificate is attached as MG1 to the founding affidavit. [10] On the 20 th August 2009 the applicant s motor was seized from his driver in a police road block in Tsolo and taken to the Police Station. The applicant later went to the Police Station in Tsolo and he not only brought to the police the person from whom he acquired the motor vehicle but also showed them the Police clearance certificate issued by them. That could not, however, persuade the Police to release or deter them from seizing the motor vehicle. 3 Act 108 of 1996
4 4 [11] In their justification of the seizure, the respondents rely on the fact that the purpose of the road block was to check for stolen motor vehicles by examining engine and chassis numbers thereof. In contending that the certificate authorising the setting up of the road block is valid, Nqadini relied on Mtshengu s answering affidavit and on the information embodied in the certificate. The information embodied in Mtshengu s answering affidavit is that the certificate which authorised the road block was signed and issued by Nqadini in terms of section 13(8) of the Police Act. [12] In the second answering affidavit, Nqadini had a second bite in the cherry to disclose the information on the strength of which he issued the authorisation certificate. In paragraph 7.1 thereof he asserts his delegated powers to authorise the setting up of a road block. He further states in paragraph that he issued the certificate after he had satisfied himself with the reasons and the cause for conducting the road block as set out in the documentation with which he was furnished. He averred in paragraph 7.4 that before issuing the certificate he satisfied himself on the information which was placed before him that it was reasonable in the circumstances to authorise the setting up of the road block. [13] Whether a seizure of an item is done on the authority of a seizure warrant issued under section 21(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act or under section 13(8) certificate authorising the road block, it must comply with the provisions of section 20 of the Act for it to be lawful. [14] The police are vested with general powers to seize an item which is concerned in or on reasonable grounds believed to be concerned in the commission or suspected commission of an offence or which may afford
5 5 evidence of the commission of an offence (section 20 of the Act). Section 21(1)(a) authorises a magistrate or justice of the peace to issue a search warrant for the seizure of an article referred to in section 20 if it appears to him that from information on oath there are reasonable grounds for believing that such article is in the possession or under the control or upon any person or upon or at any premises within his area of jurisdiction. [15] Section 13(8) of the Police Act (which is relevant in this application) regulates the setting up of police road blocks and the procedure to be followed in a road block. Its relevant provisions briefly provide as follows: (a) The National or Provincial Commissioner may, where it is reasonable in the circumstances in order to exercise a power or perform a function referred to in section 215 of the Constitution in writing authorise a member under his or her command to set up a road block on any public road in a particular area. b) The written authorisation must specify the date, approximate duration place and object of the proposed action. c) Any member authorised under paragraph (a) may set up or cause a road block to be set up on any public road in the area so specified. g) Any member may, without warrant- (i) in the event of a road block set up in accordance with paragraph (c) search any person or vehicle stopped at such road block and seize any article referred to in section 20 of the Criminal Procedure Act found by him or her in the possession of such person.
6 6 [16] The element of reasonable suspicion in section 20 of the Act is a common jurisdictional factor which precedes the issuing of both a search warrant in terms of section 21(1)(a) and a certificate in terms of section 13(8) of the Police Act. The authorities that guide the court in the interpretation of section 20 apply, mutatis mutandis, in the interpretation of a search warrant and a section 13(8) certificate. These pieces of legislation require strict interpretation. This view finds support in the judgment of the Cape Provincial Division: Minister of Finance & Others v Ramors 4 in which the following observation was made: In this connection it should be borne in mind that where a party opposing an application for a mandament van spolie (the seizure of a vehicle) relies upon a statutory provision in order to support an averment that he was entitled thereby to deprive the applicant of his possession, without recourse to due process of law, and that such deprivation of possession was therefore lawful, such statutory provision must be restrictively interpreted. A person who invokes a protection of such a statutory provision will need to establish that he acted strictly within its terms. [17] The need for strict interpretation of a statutory provision which authorises the seizure of a person s property arises from the fact that it limits the individual right to property which is protected by the Constitution 5. The courts of this country recognised long before the advent of the Constitutional dispensation that search and seizure legislation constitutes an unacceptable invasion into the rights of individuals, thus calling for strict interpretation thereof. It was required even then that the search and seizure should comply strictly with the seizure warrant. This view is confirmed in the Transvaal Provincial (4)SA 1096(C) at 1101 G-H 5 Section 14 of the Constitution provides that Everyone has the right to privacy which includes the right not to have a) their property searched; their possessions seized.
7 7 Division judgment in De Wet & Others v Williers NO and Another in which the following dictum appears 6 : To enter premises, to search those premises, and to remove goods therefrom is an important invasion of the rights of an individual. The law empowers police officers to infringe the rights of citizens in that way provided that they have a legal warrant to do so. They must act within the terms of that warrant. When a dispute arises as to what power is conferred by the warrant the warrant must be construed with reasonable strictness, and accordingly there is no reason why it should be read otherwise than in the terms in which it is expressed. [18] The test to determine the existence of reasonable grounds which led to the seizure is objective 7 and in this judgment Didcott J stated the following about section 20: The second respondent no doubt thought there were reasonable grounds for the belief he held. That, however, was by the way. Section 20 of the Criminal Procedure Act calls for the existence in fact of reasonable grounds. And whether these exist in a given case must be determined objectively. Milner J once said:- There can be reasonable cause to believe where., considered objectively there are reasonable grounds for the belief..it cannot be said that an officer has reasonable cause to believe merely because he believes he has reasonable cause to believe. [19] In Singwebedlana v Minister of Police 8, it was held by Davis AJ that it is for the Court to determine whether objectively there are reasonable grounds for believing that an article sought to seized in terms of the section is concerned in the commission or suspected commission of an offence. The court further held that there should be sufficiently detailed information placed before the Court on which such belief is (4)SA 124(T) at 127B 7 Ndabeni v Minister of Law and Order 1984(3) SA 500(1) & CLD at 511 D-F 8 Case no.274/94 Unreported judgment of Davis AJ of this Court.
8 8 based. [20] The issue to consider is therefore whether on the information placed before the court by Mtshengu, Kwanini and Nqadini, as set out in paragraph[11] and [12] above, is sufficient to establish, objectively, reasonable circumstances as envisaged in section 13(8)(a) of the Police Act, justifying the issue of the authorisation certificate for the setting up of the road block. [21] Nothing further can be gleaned from the information furnished to Nqadini as creating reasonable circumstances justifying the issuing of the authorisation certificate to Kwanini to set up the road block in Tsolo. Neither is information contained in the certificate evidence from which Nqadini could have inferred the existence of reasonable grounds justifying the issuing of the section 13(8) (a) certificate. The information in the certificate is no more than conclusion arrived at by Nqadini from undisclosed information on the basis of which he acted. [22] Mr Gagela, counsel for the respondents, submitted that Nqadini acted on the requirements of section 215 of the Interim Constitution 9 which are the prevention of crime; the investigation of any offence or alleged offence; the maintenance of law and order and the preservation of the internal security of the Republic of South Africa. I have no doubt that these are general constitutional functions of the members of the South African Police Service which have to be carried out subject to section 20 of the Act. To be exact, in order for a policeman to act in terms of section 215 of the Interim Constitution, there must be information placed before him, which he must in turn place before the court, which made 9 Act 200 of 1993
9 9 him to believe on reasonable grounds that he must seize an item for the prevention of crime; investigation of an offence or alleged offence; the maintenance of law and order and the preservation of internal security of the Republic. That information has not been placed before the Court. The existence of the reasonable grounds must be before the search and seizure and must justify the search and seizure. [23] In the unreported judgment of this Court 10, where the policeman had relied on a search warrant issued on the information furnished to them by an informer that the motor vehicle was a stolen item, Pakade J made the following dictum 11 : That information which was furnished to them was not furnished on oath as the name of the informer was not even disclosed to the Court..The mere saying so by the informer that the applicant s motor vehicle is stolen does not establish, objectively, a reasonable ground for the belief that the motor vehicle was indeed a stolen article and as such liable to be seized. Apart from the information that the motor vehicle is kept in a locked garage during the day and used at night, there is no other information at the disposal of Ntlantsana before the search. The only information about the tampering of the chassis numbers was obtained after the search. The search warrant which was issued on the application of Ntlantsana cannot justify the search which was conducted contrary to the provisions of section 20 even if it had resulted in the finding of suspicious features in the motor vehicle such as tampering with the chassis numbers. [24] Just as in the Zinja case, supra, upon seizure of the applicant`s motor vehicle, the police found some discrepancies on its engine and chassis numbers. These discrepancies induced reasonable belief in the 10 Khotso Zinja v Minister of Safety & Security & Ors Case No: 147/05 delivered on 24 November Page 5 paragraph [12] & page 8 paragraph [19] & page 9 paragraph [20]
10 10 mind of Mtshengu and Kwanini that the applicant`s motor vehicle was stolen. As said above, the reasonable belief entertained after the search cannot justify the search and seizure which was otherwise unlawful. [25] In my respectful view, therefore the respondents have not shown that the applicant`s motor vehicle is an item to be seized under s 13(8) of the Police Act as they failed to satisfy the requirements of s 20 of the Act. [26] Now that I have found that the search and seizure were unlawful, I have to consider the second leg of the same coin, namely, whether or not the applicant can lawfully possess the motor vehicle notwithstanding the finding of discrepancies on its engine and chassis numbers. In this respect the police must establish a case in terms of section 31(1)(a) of the Act. Those provisions are that if no criminal proceedings are instituted in accordance with the article or that such article is not required at the trial for purposes of evidence or an order of the court, the article must be returned to the person from whom it was seized if such person may lawfully possess it. Much as an applicant affected by the s 20 seizure is entitled to the return of goods, the applicant who is affected by the s 13(8) of the Police Act seizure is entitled to the return of the goods unless the State can prove on a balance of probabilities that the possession will be unlawful. The respondents have not placed evidence before the Court showing that the motor vehicle is required for purposes of trial or an order of court. Although the evidence of the respondents is that the engine and chassis numbers of the motor vehicle had some discrepancies, there is no evidence that these are not discrepancies which were cleared by the police earlier when the applicant took the motor vehicle to them for a checking and issuing of clearance certificate. The applicant s version that the motor vehicle had history of having been stolen has not
11 11 been gainsaid by the respondents, in which event they should have refuted that and also put up an averment that the discrepancies appearing in the engine and chassis numbers were caused subsequent to the issuing of the clearance certificate. Order: [27] In the circumstances, I make the following Order: 1. That the search and seizure of the applicant s motor vehicle, being a Toyota venture with registration letters and number DRH 397 EC is declared unlawful and is hereby set aside; 2. That the respondents are hereby directed to forthwith release the aforesaid motor vehicle to the applicant. 3. That the respondents shall pay costs of suit jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved. L. P. PAKADE JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT Attorney for the Applicant : Mr M. Notyesi Instructed by Mvuzo Notyesi Inc. Applicant s Attorneys
12 12 2 nd Floor T. H. Madala Chambers 14 Durham Street MTHATHA Counsel for the Respondent : Adv Gagela Instructed by The State Attorney Respondents Attorneys No. 94 Sission Street Broadcast House Fortgale MTHATHA Matter heard on : 17 August 2010 Judgment delivered on : 09 September 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA) CASE NO. 1273/08 In the matter between: NKOSIYAZI WELLINGTON MADLAVU Applicant and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY First Respondent THE STATION
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The applicant seeks an order directing the respondents to return a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA) CASE NO: 862/09 DELIVERED ON : 08/04/10 In the matter between: EUNICE FEZIWE MBANGI Applicant And THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT In the matters between: Case No: 440/10 MASIXOLE PAKULE Appellant and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY First Respondent THE STATION COMMISSIONER, MTHATHA CENTRAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG) ADRIAAN ALBERTUS STOLTZ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG) CASE NO.: M320/15 In the matter between: ADRIAAN ALBERTUS STOLTZ APPLICANT And THE MINISTER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE N.O THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER
More information[1] This is an appeal, brought with leave granted by the court a quo
Republic of South Africa In the High Court of South Africa Western Cape High Court, Cape Town CASE NO: A228/2009 MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY SUPERINTENDENT NOEL GRAHAM ZEEMAN PAUL CHRISTIAAN LOUW N.O.
More informationEASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA CASE NO 3642/2015 In the matter between: MINISTER OF POLICE, LIBODE STATION COMMISSIONER 1 st Applicant 2 nd Defendant And REFORMED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06. In the matter between: and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06 In the matter between: THANDILE FUNDA Plaintiff and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Defendant JUDGMENT MILLER, J.:
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) MOGALE, DAISY DIBUSENG PAULINAH...First Applicant
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN ELEFTERIOS POLONYFIS T/A LITTLE MANHATTAN
IN THE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Application No.: 2273 / 2015 In the matter between: ELEFTERIOS POLONYFIS T/A LITTLE MANHATTAN Applicant And THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND
More informationOF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA CONTENTS. No. 150 Promulgation of Motor Vehicle Theft Act, 1999 (Act 12 of 1999), of the Parliament.
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$3.00 WINDHOEK 26 July 1999 No. 2150 CONTENTS GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 150 Promulgation of Motor Vehicle Theft Act, 1999 (Act 12 of 1999), of the Parliament.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Transkei Division) CASE NO. 42/06
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Transkei Division) CASE NO. 42/06 In the matter between: THE STATE v LUNGISANI MTYO ZUKILE KUTULE SIVUYILE BOTOMAN NKOSINATHI MTYO ACCUSED NO.1 ACCUSED NO.2 ACCUSED NO.3
More informationTHE MINISTER OF POLICE THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE STATION COMMISSIONER, SAPS, VIRGINIA COMBINED PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS
/vv FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Application no. 141/2012 In the application between: AC ROSSOUW Applicant and THE MINISTER OF POLICE THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE STATION
More informationChapter 9:17 SERIOUS OFFENCES (CONFISCATION OF PROFITS) ACT Acts 12/1990, 22/1992 (s. 20), 12/1997 (s. 6), 9/1999, 22/2001. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Chapter 9:17 SERIOUS OFFENCES (CONFISCATION OF PROFITS) ACT Acts 12/1990, 22/1992 (s. 20), 12/1997 (s. 6), 9/1999, 22/2001. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation.
More informationMUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT
MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT CHAPTER 11:24 Act 39 of 1997 Amended by 7 of 2001 14 of 2004 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 76.. 1/ L.R.O. 2 Ch. 11:24 Mutual
More information[1] The applicant seeks an order in the following terms:
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION : MTHATHA CASE NO: 2746/2018 BATABO TSEGEYA Applicant and MINISTER OF POLICE 1 st Respondent THE STATION COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL POLICE STATION
More informationRepublic of Trinidad and Tobago
Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Act No. 39 of 1997 Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act An Act to make provision with respect to the Scheme relating to Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters within
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) PATRICK S. MPAKA SIMLINDILE MNAMATHA XOLISA BANTSHI NOLWANDO LITHOLI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 3627/2015 In the matter between: PATRICK S. MPAKA SIMLINDILE MNAMATHA XOLISA BANTSHI NOLWANDO LITHOLI 1 ST Applicant 2
More informationDelivered on: 31/05/13 NOT REPORTABLE SANDISO THIRDMAN MATU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA CASE NO: 2408/10 Heard on: 27/05/13 Delivered on: 31/05/13 NOT REPORTABLE In the matter between: SANDISO THIRDMAN MATU Plaintiff and MINISTER
More informationTHE MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY THE NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS APPEAL JUDGMENT
NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO: CA 107/2016 Date Heard: 10 March 2017 Date Delivered: 16 March 2017 In the matter between: THE MINISTER OF SAFETY
More informationCHAPTER 337 THE SOCIETIES ACT An Act to provide for the registration of societies and for other related matters. [1st June, 1954]
CHAPTER 337 THE SOCIETIES ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Determination of whether a society is a sports association. 4. Sports associations
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO. 259/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO. 259/2018 In the matter between: SANGO MAVUSO Applicant and MRS MDAYI/CHAIRPERSON PICARDY COMMUNAL FARM COMMITTEE RESIDENTS
More informationNORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV
NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG In the matter between: CASE NO.: 154/2010 SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV APPLICANT and NORTH WEST GAMBLING BOARD INSPECTOR FREDDY INSPECTOR PITSE THE STATION COMMANDER OF THE RUSTENBURG
More informationOCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO 85 OF 1993
REVISION No.: 0 Page 1 of 23 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO 85 OF 1993 CONTENTS CLICK ON PAGE NUMBER TO GO TO SECTION OR REGULATION AND USE WEB TOOLBAR TO NAVIGATE Pre-amble 3 Section 7 3 Section
More informationPRAEDIAL LARCENY PREVENTION ACT
PRAEDIAL LARCENY PREVENTION ACT CHAPTER 10:03 Act 12 of 1963 Amended by 19 of 1970 36 of 1976 45 of 1979 21 of 1990 8 of 1992 56 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O.
More informationLabuan Offshore Financial Services Authority (Amendment) LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act A1365
Labuan Offshore Financial Services Authority (Amendment) 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act A1365 LABUAN OFFSHORE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2010 2 Laws of Malaysia ACT A1365 Date of Royal Assent......
More informationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT NO. 116 OF 1998
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT NO. 116 OF 1998 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 20 NOVEMBER, 1998] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 15 DECEMBER, 1999] (English text signed by the President) This Act has been updated to Government
More informationLatestLaws.com. All About Process to Compel the Production of Things. Under Chapter VII of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973.
All About Process to Compel the Production of Things Under Chapter VII of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 By Pinky Dass Part A- ( Summons to Produce ) The law regarding processes to compel the production
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The matter serves before me consequent upon an appeal judgment and order
NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA Case No: 3412/2017 Date Heard: 1/02/2018 Date Delivered: 27/02/18 In the matter between: NOMKHITHA NTANTANA Applicant
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ACT 27 OF ] (English text signed by the President)
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ACT 27 OF 2002 [ASSENTED TO 12 JULY 2002] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 16 AUGUST 2002] ACT (English text signed by the President) Regulations
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to
More informationCHAPTER 3.04 SAINT LUCIA. Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008
SAINT LUCIA CHAPTER 3.04 PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationMONEY LAUNDERING (PREVENTION) ACT, 1996
AND Arrangement of Sections ANTIGUA AND No. 9 of 1996 as amended by No. 9 of 1999 and No. 6 of 2001 MONEY LAUNDERING (PREVENTION) ACT, 1996 Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short Title 2.
More informationCHAPTER 66:01 GUYANA GOLD BOARD ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Guyana Gold Board 3 CHAPTER 66:01 GUYANA GOLD BOARD ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Establishment of the 4. Functions of the 5. Fixing the price of gold. 6. Producers
More informationBELIZE WRECKS AND SALVAGE ACT CHAPTER 237 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE WRECKS AND SALVAGE ACT CHAPTER 237 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationNON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT entered into by and between TRANSNET LIMITED Registration Number 1990/000900/06 (hereinafter referred to as Transnet") and..... Registration Number (hereinafter referred to as
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA CASE NUMBER: 68993/09 DATE: 23 FEBRUARY 2010 In the matter between: COLIN JOSEPH DE JAGER First Applicant SOUTH ROCK TRADING 20 CC Second Applicant And THE MINISTER
More informationSouth Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998
South Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998 Africa Legal Aid Accra The Hague Pretoria ACT To provide for the issuing of protection orders with regard to domestic violence; and for matters connected therewith.
More informationCASE NO: 6084/15. In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED. Applicant. and
Republic of South Africa In the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town) In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED CASE NO: 6084/15 Applicant and PERSONS WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE TO THE
More informationPlease quote our reference: PFA/KN/ /2015/MD REGISTERED POST. Dear Sir,
4 th Floor Riverwalk Office Park Block A, 41 Matroosberg Road Ashlea Gardens, Extension 6 PRETORIA SOUTH AFRICA 0181 P.O. Box 580, MENLYN, 0063 Tel: 012 346 1738, Fax: 086 693 7472 E-Mail: enquiries@pfa.org.za
More informationStock Theft Act 12 of 1990 (GG 63) came into force on date of publication: 28 August 1990
(GG 63) came into force on date of publication: 28 August 1990 as amended by Stock Theft Amendment Act 4 of 1991 (GG 201) came into force on date of publication: 14 May 1991 Stock Theft Amendment Act 19
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH. CASE NO: 4305 / 2017 Date heard: 26 June 2018 Date delivered: 31 July 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO: 4305 / 2017 Date heard: 26 June 2018 Date delivered: 31 July 2018 In the matter between JUNE KORKIE JUNE KORKIE N.O. JACK
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. (Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha) CASE NO. 615/08. In the matter between: NTOMBOKUQALA MAKHITSHI NOLULAMO ZAZAZA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha) CASE NO. 615/08 In the matter between: NTOMBOKUQALA MAKHITSHI NOLULAMO ZAZAZA AYEZA NONTOBEKO BOYCE NOMTHUNZI OLGA HLAKUVA NOMAKHOSAZANA
More informationTHE EXTRADITION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation PART II EXTRADITION TO AND
THE EXTRADITION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation PART II EXTRADITION TO AND FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES A. Application of this Part 3.
More informations(;)e)ff... =. YLt.s. '...
1 JUDGMENT (Digital Audio Recording Transcriptions)/aj IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 16494-2018 DATE: ( 1) REPORTABLE: 1il / NO (2) O F INTER EST TO OTHER JUDGES:
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009
COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Court of Appeal Rules 2009 Arrangement of Rules COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Arrangement of Rules Rule PART I - PRELIMINARY 7 1 Citation and commencement... 7 2 Interpretation....
More informationMINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA Case No. 2074/11 Date heard: 25/2/15 Date delivered: 27/2/15 Not reportable In the matter between: VUYISA SOFIKA Plaintiff and MINISTER
More informationPUBLIC ORDER ACT 1979 (NIGERIA) Arrangement of sections
PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1979 (NIGERIA) Arrangement of sections 1. Power to regulate assemblies, meetings and processions 2. Power to stop assemblies, meetings and processions 3. Unlawful assemblies 4. Power to
More informationCHAPTER 96 EXTRADITION ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
[CH.96 1 CHAPTER 96 LIST OF AUTHORISED PAGES 1 14B LRO 1/2006 15 21 Original SECTION ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Application of the provisions of this
More informationTRADING IN PROHIBITED GOODS ACT
LAWS OF KENYA TRADING IN PROHIBITED GOODS ACT CHAPTER 519 Revised Edition 2012 [1967] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev.
More informationThis Act may be cited as the Mutual Assistance in Criminal and Related Matters Act 2003.
MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL AND RELATED MATTERS ACT 2003 Act 35 of 2003 15 November 2003 P 29/03; Amended 34/04 (P 40/04); 35/04 (P 39/04); 14/05 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I - PRELIMINARY 1. Short
More informationTitle 10 Laws of Bermuda Item 12 BERMUDA 1973 : 48 OBSCENE PUBLICATIONS ACT 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. [preamble and words of enactment omitted]
BERMUDA 1973 : 48 OBSCENE PUBLICATIONS ACT 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Interpretation 2 Obscenity 3 Offences involving obscene articles 3A Offence of advertising obscene article 4 Functions of Broadcasting
More informationCHAPTER 10:04 FUGITIVE OFFENDERS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART l PART II
Fugitive Offenders 3 CHAPTER 10:04 FUGITIVE OFFENDERS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART l PRELIMINARY SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. Application of this Act in
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No 427/96 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In die matter of: GNH OFFICE AUTOMATION C.C. First Appellant NAUGIS INVESTMENTS C.C. Second Appellant and PROVINCIAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY) NAFCOC NORTHERN CAPE NAFCOC INVESTMENTS HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY) In the matter between: CASE NO.: 6/2013 Case heard: 18-01-2013 Date delivered: 27-03-2013 NAFCOC NORTHERN CAPE NAFCOC INVESTMENTS
More informationINDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT CHAPTER 12:01 48 of 1920 5 of 1923 21 of 1936 14 of 1939 25 of 1948 1 of 1955 10 of 1961 11 of 1961 29 of 1977 45 of 1979 Act 12 of 1917 Amended by *See Note
More informationLAWS OF BRUNEI CHAPTER 146 PASSPORTS
CHAPTER 146 PASSPORTS S 27/1983 1984 Edition, Chapter 146 Amended by S 6/1986 S 2/2000 S 44/2003 S 24/2004 S 54/2005 S 33/2007 S 1/2008 REVISED EDITION 2013 B.L.R.O. 1/2013 CAP. 146 1 REVISED EDITION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI 1 st Applicant 2 nd Applicant And THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
More informationBELIZE CORONERS ACT CHAPTER 126 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE CORONERS ACT CHAPTER 126 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN SOLAR MOUNTING SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between: Case No.: 3717/2014 SOLAR MOUNTING SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD Applicant and ENGALA AFRICA (PTY) LTD SCHLETTER SOUTH AFRICA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION) In the matter between: KIMBERLEY CASE NO.: 1516/06 & 1517/16 DATE HEARD:13 12 2006 DATE OF JUDGMENT:13 12 2006 PATRICK MOREKISI GABAATHOLE Applicant
More informationChapter 22:05 EXCHANGE CONTROL ACT Acts 62/1964, 8/1967, 15/1970, 43/1975, 42/1977 (s. 3), 22/2001, 14/2002; R.G.N 1135/1975. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Chapter 22:05 EXCHANGE CONTROL ACT Acts 62/1964, 8/1967, 15/1970, 43/1975, 42/1977 (s. 3), 22/2001, 14/2002; R.G.N 1135/1975. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Short title. 2. Regulatory powers of the
More informationBERMUDA CRIMINAL JUSTICE (INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION) (BERMUDA) ACT : 41
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA CRIMINAL JUSTICE (INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION) (BERMUDA) ACT : 41 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8A 9 10 11 Short title Interpretation PART I PRELIMINARY PART II CRIMINAL
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 41/99 JÜRGEN HARKSEN Appellant versus THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS: CAPE OF GOOD
More informationIn the High Court of South Africa. Uransvaal Provincial Division]
DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: Y5S/NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: y=s/no. (3) REVISED. T- ^ rl&tm DATE SIGNATURE In the High Court of South Africa Uransvaal Provincial Division]
More informationMAGISTRATES COURTS (FORMS) RULES
MAGISTRATES COURTS (FORMS) RULES CAP. 7.36.2 Magistrates Courts (Forms) Rules CAP. 7.36.2 Arrangement of Rules MAGISTRATES COURTS (FORMS) RULES Arrangement of Rules Rule 1 Citation... 7 2 Forms to be
More information(2) This Code shall come into operation on such date as the Minister may, by notification in the Gazette, appoint.
Short title and commencement 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 and is generally referred to in this Act as this Code. (2) This Code shall come into operation on such date
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO: In the matter between: MINISTER OF POLICE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: MINISTER OF POLICE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO.: 2589/2012 In the matter between: MLINDELI DAVID SEPTEMBER
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationMINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT. [1] In accordance to an agreement which was reached between the
Not Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION PORT ELIZABETH In the matter between: Case No: 3509/2012 Date Heard: 15/08/2016 Date Delivered: 1/09/2016 ANDILE SILATHA Plaintiff
More informationANTI MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 1996 (Act 8 of 1996)
ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 1996 (Act 8 of 1996) An Act to criminalise money laundering, to require financial institutions to maintain identification procedures and record keeping procedures, to make orders
More informationGENERAL NOTICE. Notice no. of 2013
GENERAL NOTICE Notice no. of 2013 WILMOT GODFREY JAMES, MP PUBLICATION AND INVITATION TO COMMENT ON THE DRAFT PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE BILL In terms of Rules of 241(1) and 241(2) the National
More informationCHAPTER 105 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION) ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Home About This Site Publications Purchasing FAQ Copyright Disclaimer Consultative Documents Contact Us Laws On-line Statute Law By Chapter By Title Supplementary Volume Subsidiary Legislation Annual Volume
More informationCRUELTY TO ANIMALS LAW (ANIMAL PROTECTION),
CRUELTY TO ANIMALS LAW (ANIMAL PROTECTION), 5754-1994 1 1. Definitions: In this Law - "Animal Protection Organisation" - a registered co-operation whose object and activities are the protection of animals,
More informationCHAPTER 379 COMPETITION ACT
COMPETITION [CAP. 379. 1 CHAPTER 379 COMPETITION ACT To regulate competition, enable the application of Council Regulation (EC) 1/2003 and provide for fair trading in Malta. III. 2004.125. 1st February,
More informationPapua New Guinea: Proceeds of Crime Act 2005
The Asian Development Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development do not guarantee the accuracy of this document and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE ) n i c r yyv i 0 (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) ;2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YBS/NO. (3) REVISED. / /l \ CASE No. 60892/2011
More informationPARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
(internet version) PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA MAINTENANCE ACT, No. 37 OF 1999 [Certified on 22nd October, 1999] printed on the Order of Government Published as a Supplement
More informationBELIZE ALIENS ACT CHAPTER 159 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE ALIENS ACT CHAPTER 159 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the Law
More informationThe Public Order Act
LAWS OF KENYA The Public Order Act Chapter 56 Revised Edition 2009 (2003) Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney General 2 CAP. 56 Public Order [Rev. 2009
More informationMiscellaneous Criminal Application No. F46 of 2005 J U D G M E N T. which the Attorney-General is cited as the respondent. Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOTSWANA HELD AT FRANCISTOWN In the matter between Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. F46 of 2005 PAULIN SEFU JONATHAN BIGABE IMANI MWAMBI PALADIN BISIMWA 1 ST APPLICANT 2 ND APPLICANT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy Reportable: YES / NO Circulate to Judges: YES /
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Registered at the Post Ofice as a Newspaper As n Nuusblad by die Poskantoor Geregistreer VOL. 402 CAPE TOWN,
More informationIN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT MAHIKENG CASE NO.: M66/2016 In the matter between:
IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT MAHIKENG CASE NO.: M66/2016 In the matter between: ABRAHAM PAULUS BISSCHOFF ABRAHAM PAULUS BISSCHOFF (in his capacity as representative of the trustee of the Paul Bisschoff
More informationROTARY FLUID CONTROL CC IAN WILLIAM LONGMORE DEBORAH ANNE LONGMORE JOHANNES JOACOBUS KRUGER PIETER WILLEM BRUMMER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) UNREPORTABLE DATE: 20/06/05 Case Number: 18878/2005 In the matter between: ROT ARY SEAliNG SERVICES CC ROTARY FLUID CONTROL CC IAN WILLIAM
More informationCHAPTER 3.05 PRAEDIAL LARCENY ACT
SAINT LUCIA CHAPTER 3.05 PRAEDIAL LARCENY ACT Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationEASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA CASE NO: 2743/11 SAKHELE PRECIOUS NKUME. FIRST NATONAL BANK Respondent JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA CASE NO: 2743/11 Heard on: 06/03/12 Delivered on: 15/03/12 In the matter between: SAKHELE PRECIOUS NKUME Applicant and FIRSTRAND BANK
More informationENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN CIVIL JUDGMENTS ACT 28 OF 1994 [ASSENTED TO 16 NOVEMBER 1994] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 29 NOVEMBER 1994] (Signed by the
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN CIVIL JUDGMENTS ACT 28 OF 1994 [ASSENTED TO 16 NOVEMBER 1994] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 29 NOVEMBER 1994] (Signed by the President) as amended by International Co-operation in Criminal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA CASE NO: 2248/12. Heard on: 02/09/13. Delivered on: 26/09/13 REPORTABLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA CASE NO: 2248/12 Heard on: 02/09/13 Delivered on: 26/09/13 REPORTABLE In the matter between: SIWAPHIWE MAGWENTSHU Plaintiff and MINISTER
More informationTRADE MARKS (JERSEY) LAW 2000
TRADE MARKS (JERSEY) LAW 2000 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Trade Marks (Jersey) Law 2000 Arrangement TRADE MARKS (JERSEY) LAW 2000 Arrangement
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM (PTY) LTD PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED
UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No: 28738/2006 Date heard: 25 & 26 /10/2007 Date of judgment: 12/05/2008 LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM
More informationCHAPTER 256 THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 256 THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Section Title 1. Short title. 2. Application. 3. Interpretation. 4. Meaning of "conviction",
More informationPREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DRUG DEPENDENCY ACT 20 OF 1992
Page 1 of 32 PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DRUG DEPENDENCY ACT 20 OF 1992 (English text signed by the State President) [Assented To: 3 March 1992] [Commencement Date: 30 April 1993 unless otherwise indicated]
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA) CASE NO. CA 155/2010 REPORTABLE MAMELA TAXI RANK (PTY) LTD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA) CASE NO. CA 155/2010 REPORTABLE In the matter between: MAMELA TAXI ASSOCIATION NDUMISO AARON GODLOZA NTSIKELELO MESILANE 1 st Appellant
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 38/04 RADIO PRETORIA Applicant versus THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY OF SOUTH AFRICA THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY
More informationACTS OF SRI LANKA. Debt Recovery (Special Provision) (Amendment) Act No 9 of 1994
ACTS OF SRI LANKA Debt Recovery (Special Provision) (Amendment) Act No 9 of 1994 AN ACT TO AMEND THE DEBT REVOVERY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT, NO. 2 of 1990 BE it enacted by the Parliament of the Democratic
More informationRoad Transport Act 1981
Supplement No. 1 To Gazette No. 29 of 14th August, 1981 Road Transport Act 1981 Act No. 6 of 1981 Published by the Authority of the Prime Minister Price: 90 Lisente Section 1. Short title and commencement
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Civil Judgments Act 28 of 1994 (GG 978) came into force on date of publication: 29 November 1994
Enforcement of Foreign Civil Judgments Act 28 of 1994 (GG 978) came into force on date of publication: 29 November 1994 as amended by International Co-operation in Criminal Matters Act 9 of 2000 (GG 2327)
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT
I GOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA CAPE TOWN. -1 SEPT[{MBER 1998 vol. 399 No. 19212 KAAPSTAD. 4 SEPTE\l BER 1998 OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT KANTOOR VAN DIE PRESIDENT N().
More informationBILL. AN ACT to amend the Integrity in Public Life Act, Chap. 22:01
BILL AN ACT to amend the Integrity in Public Life Act, Chap. 22:01 Preamble WHEREAS it is enacted by section 13(1) of the Constitution that an Act of Parliament to which that section applies may expressly
More informationNo. of 2001 Dogs (Licensing and Control) Bill, 2001 Saint Christopher and Nevis SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS. No. of 2001
No. of 2001 Dogs (Licensing and Control) Bill, 2001 Saint Christopher and Nevis SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS No. of 2001 AN ACT to make provision for regulating the keeping of dogs generally and the keeping
More information