IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA)
|
|
- Gabriel May
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA) CASE NO. 1273/08 In the matter between: NKOSIYAZI WELLINGTON MADLAVU Applicant and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY First Respondent THE STATION COMMISSIONER, MTHATHA CENTRAL POLICE Second Respondent SUPERINTENDENT HINTSA Third Respondent J U D G M E N T SANGONI ADJP: [1] The applicant herein is Nkosiyazi Wellington Madlavu who resides at Mvumelwano location in the district of Qumbu in the province of the Eastern Cape.
2 2 [2] The first respondent is the Minister of Safety and Security for the Government of the Republic of South Africa, cited in these proceedings in his capacity as such. [3] Second respondent is the station commissioner at Mthatha Central Police Station. He is also cited in his official capacity on the basis that the motor vehicle that forms the subject of these proceedings, is being kept at the police station of which he is in charge. [4] The third respondent holds a rank of superintendent in the South African Police Service (SAPS). At the time of the incident he was a station commander at Qumbu Police Station. [5] These proceedings initially kicked off on 8 September 2008 when the applicant launched an application against the first and second respondents seeking an order, in the main, to declare unlawful the search, seizure and continued detention of the applicant s motor vehicle to wit, a Toyota Hi-Ace with registration letters and numbers BRB 980 EC (the vehicle). [6] The basis for the application is/was on mandament van spolie. The averments were that the members of the SAPS met with the
3 3 applicant s driver and dispossessed the latter of the vehicle; they claim that they were searching for it for some time and they had received information that it had been stolen. [7] The first two respondents filed opposing affidavits, wherein it is alleged that on 5 December 2007 the members of the SAPS were manning a properly constituted roadblock to search and seize stolen vehicles, illegal firearms and prohibited drugs. It was then in the course of that roadblock that the vehicle in question was seized by the police. The said roadblock, so it is stated, has been authorised in terms of section 13(8)(a) of the South African Police Service Act 68 of 1995 (the Act) by the third respondent. [8] Of primary importance for purposes of this judgment, the applicant challenges the validity of the authorisation certificate issued by the third respondent, purportedly in terms of section 13(8)(a) of the Act. The basis of such challenge is that the certificate is vague, general and it lacks particularity. This subsection 8(a) provides: - The National or Provincial Commissioner may, where it is reasonable in the circumstances in order to exercise a power or perform a function referred to in section 215 of the Constitution, in writing authorise a member under his or her command, to set up a roadblock or roadblocks on
4 4 any public road in a particular area or set up a checkpoint or checkpoints at any public place in a particular area. [9] Initially there were other grounds raised but later abandoned. Reasons thereof will become clear later. On 28 May 2009 this court granted an order at the request of the applicant to introduce an additional prayer that reads: That the certificate issued by the 3 rd respondent in terms of section 13(8) (a) of the South African Police Service Act 1995 (Act 68 of 1995) being annexure TNM1 to the respondents answering affidavit, be declared invalid and of no force and effect and be set aside as nullity. [10] Mr Mtalana a police captain in the SAPS attached to the Vehicle Identification Unit deposed to the answering affidavit. He states therein that he was in charge of the roadblock referred to above, which was held at Ridge Stop on the N2 National Road between Qumbu and Mount Frere. In keeping with what he says in the founding affidavit, the applicant denies there was a roadblock. He specifically denies that the police held a roadblock at Ridge Stop. According to the applicant the vehicle was seized at a spot just after passing Luqolweni. There is nothing specific that is detailed regarding the location of the spot where there was a roadblock or where the vehicle was seized. There also no details to help establish where Ridge Stop is located.
5 5 [11] At argument stage Ms Da silva, Counsel for the applicant abandoned all points raised by the applicant, and confined the applicant s case to determination of one issue, namely, the validity of the authorisation certificate. That challenge of invalidity in turn, limited to the allegation that the relevant certificate is vague, general and without particularity. Accordingly, if the certificate is found to be valid that would be the end of the applicant s case. The application would thus be liable to be dismissed. [12] The other points raised by the applicant have been abandoned. Whatever the respondents would have scored from such abandonment would not translate into any significant gain without the certificate being valid. An example of such points would be the contention by the applicant that the police had verified that the vehicle was not a stolen one and that they issued a police clearance certificate on that basis before the vehicle was registered. That would not advance the respondents case if the validity of the certificate would not have been established. In successfully disputing those issues perhaps, does not make the respondents to get entitlement to an order to continue to keep the vehicle in their position. Those could only play a significant role if the certificate was valid. In a situation where mandament van spolie applies, the illegality of the
6 6 possession is not material. What counts is whether the police had a search warrant or a valid authorisation certificate at the time of the seizure. My conclusion therefore is that the validity of the certificate is key to sustaining this matter. If I find the certificate invalid I will be in no position to adjudicate upon such other issues. [13] In order to read in perspective the pertinent allegations made against the validity of the certificate, it is necessary to record as I do hereunder, the terms of the certificate in question: ROADBLOCK / CHECK POINTS AUTHORISATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 13(8) OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE ACT, 1995 [ACT No 68 OF 1995]. A 1. I the undersigned [number, rank and name] Supt Alberton Hintsa being in charge of the Crime Prevention Qumbu police station hereby authorize [specify number, rank and name of member in command of roadblock] Captain T.N MTALANA In the magistrate s district of QUMBU 2. AND/OR checkpoint of checkpoints at the following public place/s Ridge and MARAMBEI NATIONAL ROAD N2 In the magistrate s district of Qumbu B. The said operation takes place on the following dates during time period from 08H00 to 14H00 and with the aim to seize stolen vehicles and illegal firearms and drugs C. The said operation is reasonable in order to perform the undermentioned
7 7 functions: 1. The prevention of crime 2. The investigation of any offence or alleged offence 3. The maintenance of Law and Order. 4. The preservation of the internal security of the Public DATED AT QUMBU THIS 05 DAY OF DECEMBER 2007 Signature/ CAPACITY [14] The applicant s version regarding the allegation of vagueness and lack of particularity is captured in paragraph of the replying affidavit (the respondents were afforded an opportunity to respond to these amendments). The applicant states in the said paragraph: The certificate attached to the respondents answering affidavit merely refers to Ridge and Marhambeni National Road N2. Ridge is an Administrative Area with various roads. Marhambeni is far from N2 National Road so as Ridge. The only locations which are near the national road is Zifama, Gqunu farms, Mpumaze Location, New Homes. Luqolweni and Ridge are not near and/or along N2 Road. In fact the N2 Road is a vague description as it is not in a particular area. As I am a resident of Qumbu, I know the names of the localities which are near the N2 national road from town. I therefore submit that the certificate is vague as it lack particularity and leaves a discretion upon the police officer to decide where to set up a road block. In any event there is no road known as Ridge and Marhambeni National Road N2. (My underlining).
8 8 The averments underlined above are not consistent with what is depicted in the said map. That however does not assist the respondents. [15] The author of the certificate, the third respondent responds to say the certificate was meant for two areas mentioned therein including the N2 National Road running between them. The two areas referred to are Ridge and Marhambeni. He further explains it to say according to the authorisation the police were free to operate in any of the two administrative areas or in any place on the N2 National Road between the two of them. He disputes that the two administrative areas are far from N2 National Road. He avers they are both near it. According to him the police were free to conduct a roadblock at any place on the National Road between the two administrative areas. [16] Whatever superintendent Hintsa had in mind at the time he decided to issue the certificate which is no longer an issue in the light of the concessions made on behalf of the applicant, or at the time he issued it, the only reasonable and objective interpretation of the words Ridge and Marhambeni National Road N2 can only mean the N2 National Road running alongside the two administrative areas.
9 9 [17] The names of the administrative areas in this context or construction serve to describe and highlight the specific area in N2 National Road where a roadblock should be set up. I am of the view that the issue should be decided on the basis of the meaning conveyed by the words used and not what the author explains to have been his/her intention. [18] I considered it important to ascertain by means of an official map whether N2 National Road shares a common border with Marhambeni Administrative Area as well as Ridge Administrative Area and whether N2 connects the two. It is settled law that the court may consult a map for the purpose of taking judicial notice of a fact which such a map would establish beyond the possibility of reasonable dispute 1. I drew the attention of Counsel to the map of Qumbu district. I invited them to file further heads of argument. The issue in this regard is whether the portion of N2 road bordering the Ridge or Luqolweni area on the one hand and Marhambeni area on the other runs continuosly alongside the two areas where common border is shared. I am of the view that the words used by the commissioner objectively refer to that situation. If that situation does not obtain, there is not even a place called Ridge, for example, the 1 The South African Law of Evidence (DT Zeffert, AP Paizes, AST Skeen ) P.724
10 10 description by the commissioner would be meaningless and vague. The map they were referred to is number 31/28BB Qumbu published by Chief Directorate, Surveys and Mapping, Private Bag X10, Mowbray and printed by the Government Printer in Pretoria. It is an official map. [19] The map depicts that as you travel from the direction of Qumbu village towards Mount Frere, which is the route followed by the applicant s driver, Luqolweni Administrative Area is located on the left hand side of N2. It comes down a ridge and ends up at a point bordering the N2 National Road in the north easterly direction. Following the N2 from that point takes one to the next administrative area on the left hand side which is Marhambeni. [20] If the words - Ridge and Marhambeni National Road N2 - were intended to include the entire extent of the geographical areas of Ridge and Marhambeni, as the third respondent suggests, that would mean, in my view, the authorisation could not have been consistent with the relevant legislation. It would not be describing the relevant places for roadblock with the requisite degree of precision 2. Administrative areas, by design, are vast areas of land and if 2 Sithonga v Minister of Safety and Security and Others 2008(1) SACR p377
11 11 anywhere on them a roadblock is to be set up without identifying any landmark that would be a description that is wide and vague 3. Besides, that kind of approach would be confusing in the instant case, leaving out the element of N2 National Road incorporated in the description given by the commissioner. [21] What the map does not show is that there is an administrative area or any place called Ridge in Qumbu district. This is the position despite the fact that both parties refer to Ridge as an administrative area. The location thereof has not been explained by the parties. For the respondents to successfully refute that the authorisation certificate is vague, generous and lacking particularity, it is essential to show where Ridge is located along the N2 National Road and where in relation to Marhambeni Administrative Area. I have been inclined to take Ridge for Luqolweni. Clearly that inclination has been as a result of the fact that a ridge is an English word for Luqolweni. I would not know whether this has any bearing on what the applicant, unprovoked, says in its supplementary heads of argument, namely: It is further submitted it is no cure for an overbroad certificate to say that the person against whom the certificate was to be executed knew or ought to have known the area in which the roadblock was allegedly set up was commonly known as The Ridge. 3 SSS Motors (Pty) Ltd and Minister of Police, Transkei NO & Another, Case No 1386/92 (Unreported)
12 12 [22] What is now clear is that there is no case made out as to whether there is an area known as Ridge in the district of Qumbu and if there is, where it is located in order to determine whether it makes some sense for the commissioner who drew the authorisation certificate to refer to it. In addition, perhaps it would have given a different complexion to the outcome of the enquiry if it had been shown that Ridge is Luqolweni by another name. There is indeed no evidence to this effect. The map establishes that Luqolweni stretches along the N2 National Road until it connects with Marhambeni. The respondents have placed no evidence before this court even for purposes of identifying and locating the Ridge Stop. [23] In that event the applicant s version pertaining to the enquiry with regard to the validity or lack thereof of the authorisation certificate is upheld. The authorisation certificate issued by the third respondent, purportedly in terms of section 13(8)(a) of the Act, is invalid. The effect is that the vehicle in question should be released to the applicant. The part of the relief sought to the effect that the respondent be interdicted and restrained from further unlawfully interfering with the applicant s position of the motor vehicle without compliance with the law, has no factual basis laid in these proceedings. It can thus not be countenanced.
13 13 In the result the following order is made: 1. The authorisation certificate issued by the third respondent on 5 December 2007 purportedly in terms of section13(8)(a) of the South African Police Service Act No 68 of 1995 is declared invalid and is set aside; 2. the search, seizure, and continued detention of the motor vehicle, to wit, TOYOTA HI ACE with registration letters and numbers BRB 980 EC is declared unlawful; 3. the first respondent is directed to forthwith release the said vehicle to the applicant; 4. the respondents are ordered to pay the costs of the application, jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved. C T SANGONI ACTING DEPUTY JUDGE PRESIDENT
14 14 Counsel for the applicant : Adv A M Da Silva Attorneys for the applicant : Mvuzo Notyesi Inc 2 nd Floor Madala CH 14 Durham Street Mthatha Counsel for the respondents : Adv K D Qitsi Attorneys for the respondents : The State Attorney No 27 Victoria Street Cathedral Street Mthatha Date heard : 30 July 2009 Date Judgment delivered : Nkosiyazi Wellington Madlavu Case no 1273/08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha CASE NO. 2268/09 Reportable In the matter between: JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha CASE NO. 2268/09 Reportable In the matter between: MGCINENI GUGA Applicant And MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY THE STATION COMMISIONER MTHATHA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT In the matters between: Case No: 440/10 MASIXOLE PAKULE Appellant and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY First Respondent THE STATION COMMISSIONER, MTHATHA CENTRAL
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The applicant seeks an order directing the respondents to return a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA) CASE NO: 862/09 DELIVERED ON : 08/04/10 In the matter between: EUNICE FEZIWE MBANGI Applicant And THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY
More informationEASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA CASE NO 3642/2015 In the matter between: MINISTER OF POLICE, LIBODE STATION COMMISSIONER 1 st Applicant 2 nd Defendant And REFORMED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG) ADRIAAN ALBERTUS STOLTZ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG) CASE NO.: M320/15 In the matter between: ADRIAAN ALBERTUS STOLTZ APPLICANT And THE MINISTER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE N.O THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER
More informationNORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV
NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG In the matter between: CASE NO.: 154/2010 SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV APPLICANT and NORTH WEST GAMBLING BOARD INSPECTOR FREDDY INSPECTOR PITSE THE STATION COMMANDER OF THE RUSTENBURG
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) PATRICK S. MPAKA SIMLINDILE MNAMATHA XOLISA BANTSHI NOLWANDO LITHOLI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 3627/2015 In the matter between: PATRICK S. MPAKA SIMLINDILE MNAMATHA XOLISA BANTSHI NOLWANDO LITHOLI 1 ST Applicant 2
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION) In the matter between: KIMBERLEY CASE NO.: 1516/06 & 1517/16 DATE HEARD:13 12 2006 DATE OF JUDGMENT:13 12 2006 PATRICK MOREKISI GABAATHOLE Applicant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO. 259/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO. 259/2018 In the matter between: SANGO MAVUSO Applicant and MRS MDAYI/CHAIRPERSON PICARDY COMMUNAL FARM COMMITTEE RESIDENTS
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) MOGALE, DAISY DIBUSENG PAULINAH...First Applicant
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN ELEFTERIOS POLONYFIS T/A LITTLE MANHATTAN
IN THE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Application No.: 2273 / 2015 In the matter between: ELEFTERIOS POLONYFIS T/A LITTLE MANHATTAN Applicant And THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND
More informationTHE MINISTER OF POLICE THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE STATION COMMISSIONER, SAPS, VIRGINIA COMBINED PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS
/vv FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Application no. 141/2012 In the application between: AC ROSSOUW Applicant and THE MINISTER OF POLICE THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE STATION
More information[1] The applicant seeks an order in the following terms:
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION : MTHATHA CASE NO: 2746/2018 BATABO TSEGEYA Applicant and MINISTER OF POLICE 1 st Respondent THE STATION COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL POLICE STATION
More information[1] This is an appeal, brought with leave granted by the court a quo
Republic of South Africa In the High Court of South Africa Western Cape High Court, Cape Town CASE NO: A228/2009 MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY SUPERINTENDENT NOEL GRAHAM ZEEMAN PAUL CHRISTIAAN LOUW N.O.
More informationMINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT. [1] In accordance to an agreement which was reached between the
Not Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION PORT ELIZABETH In the matter between: Case No: 3509/2012 Date Heard: 15/08/2016 Date Delivered: 1/09/2016 ANDILE SILATHA Plaintiff
More informationThe Garage Keepers Act
The Garage Keepers Act being Chapter 298 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1940 (effective February 1, 1941). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for convenience
More informationCASE NO: 6084/15. In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED. Applicant. and
Republic of South Africa In the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town) In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED CASE NO: 6084/15 Applicant and PERSONS WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE TO THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH. CASE NO: 4305 / 2017 Date heard: 26 June 2018 Date delivered: 31 July 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO: 4305 / 2017 Date heard: 26 June 2018 Date delivered: 31 July 2018 In the matter between JUNE KORKIE JUNE KORKIE N.O. JACK
More informationPRAEDIAL LARCENY PREVENTION ACT
PRAEDIAL LARCENY PREVENTION ACT CHAPTER 10:03 Act 12 of 1963 Amended by 19 of 1970 36 of 1976 45 of 1979 21 of 1990 8 of 1992 56 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O.
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MOQHAKA TAXI ASSOCIATION
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Case No. : 3706/2012 MOQHAKA TAXI ASSOCIATION Applicant and MOQHAKA MUNICIPALITY FREE STATE TRANSPORT OPERATING LICENSING
More informationCriminal Procedure Act 51 of Civil procedure Absolution from the instance Test Unlawful arrest and detention Claim for damages Notion of arrest
Gali obo Gali & another v Kok & another [2009] JOL 24232 (E) Key Words Reported in: Judgments Online, a LexisNexis Electronic Law Report Series Case No: CA 115 / 06 Judgment Date(s): 27/ 08 /2009 Hearing
More information(EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE) 4 t h Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRANSKEI In the matters between: CASE NO: 185/05 TENJISWA TOTO 1 s t Respondent ADMINISTRATION 2 n d Respondent THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 3 rd Respondent MEC FOR PROVINCIAL
More informationNumber 29 of 2000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS (TRAFFICKING) ACT, 2000 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Trafficking in illegal immigrants.
Number 29 of 2000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS (TRAFFICKING) ACT, 2000 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Trafficking in illegal immigrants. 3. Power to detain certain vehicles. 4. Forfeiture
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN SOLAR MOUNTING SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between: Case No.: 3717/2014 SOLAR MOUNTING SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD Applicant and ENGALA AFRICA (PTY) LTD SCHLETTER SOUTH AFRICA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to
More informationIn the matter between:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT) In the matter between: AUTO HAUS (PVT) LTD And THE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF SAPS Respondent 1 9 3 0 / 3 JUDGEMENT MOLOPA-SETHOSA J Applicant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 426/2014. In the matter between: And MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 426/2014 Heard on: 14 October 2015 Delivered on: 10 March 2016 In the matter between: KHONAYE DLOKOLO Plaintiff And MINISTER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI 1 st Applicant 2 nd Applicant And THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy Reportable: YES / NO Circulate to Judges: YES /
More informationAN ORDINANCE OF THE, MISSOURI, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCH WARRANTS
BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE, MISSOURI, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCH WARRANTS WHEREAS, in Frech v. City of Columbia, 693 S.W.2d 813 (Mo.
More informationNSIKAYOMUZI GOODMAN GOQO DURBAN SOUTH THIRD RESPONDENT JUDGMENT. 1] The applicant approached this court on the basis of urgency, ex-parte
1 IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN NOT REPORTABLE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no. 6094/10 In the matter between: NSIKAYOMUZI GOODMAN GOQO PLAINTIFF and JOHANNES GEORGE KRUGER N.O. DALES BROTHERS
More informationH.M. MUSI, JP et HANCKE, J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the case between: Case No.: 201/2007 ROBIN GERALDINE GRIESEL and LENRé LIEBENBERG CORAM: H.M. MUSI, JP et HANCKE, J JUDGMENT:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON)
2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON) UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: Case No: 35420 / 03 Date heard: 17 & 21/02/2006 Date of judgment: 4/8/2006 PAUL JACOBUS SMIT PLAINTIFF
More informationDelivered on: 31/05/13 NOT REPORTABLE SANDISO THIRDMAN MATU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA CASE NO: 2408/10 Heard on: 27/05/13 Delivered on: 31/05/13 NOT REPORTABLE In the matter between: SANDISO THIRDMAN MATU Plaintiff and MINISTER
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J1780/14 In the matter between: BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD Applicant and ASSOCIATION OF MINEWORKERS AND CONSTRUCTION UNION
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Vol. 5 Cape Town 26 September 2013 No THE PRESIDENCY
Please note that most Acts are published in English and another South African official language. Currently we only have capacity to publish the English versions. This means that this document will only
More informationTWILIGHT BREEZE TRADING 119 CC [Registration number: 2003/065363/23]
.. \ { :' IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between:- Case No: 4134/2017
More informationPlease quote our reference: PFA/KN/ /2015/MD REGISTERED POST. Dear Sir,
4 th Floor Riverwalk Office Park Block A, 41 Matroosberg Road Ashlea Gardens, Extension 6 PRETORIA SOUTH AFRICA 0181 P.O. Box 580, MENLYN, 0063 Tel: 012 346 1738, Fax: 086 693 7472 E-Mail: enquiries@pfa.org.za
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA CASE NO: 563/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA CASE NO: 563/2008 In the matter between: NONTWAZANA MANGQO Plaintiff and MEC FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, EASTERN CAPE Defendant JUDGMENT
More informationJUDGMENT. 1 I am required to decide the disputes disclosed by the defendant's. special plea of prescription raised in defence to the plaintiffs claim.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 5664/2011 In the matter between: EDWARD THOMPSON Plaintiff and CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Defendant JUDGMENT Tuchten
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No. : 1386/2007. In the matter between:- OOSTHUYSEN YOLANDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No. : 1386/2007 In the matter between:- OOSTHUYSEN BEATRIX OOSTHUYSEN YOLANDE First Applicant Second Applicant versus OOSTHUYSEN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY) NAFCOC NORTHERN CAPE NAFCOC INVESTMENTS HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY) In the matter between: CASE NO.: 6/2013 Case heard: 18-01-2013 Date delivered: 27-03-2013 NAFCOC NORTHERN CAPE NAFCOC INVESTMENTS
More information(Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.)
Local Law Filing NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 41 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NY 12231 (Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.) Text of law should be given as amended. Do not include
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ACT 27 OF ] (English text signed by the President)
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ACT 27 OF 2002 [ASSENTED TO 12 JULY 2002] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 16 AUGUST 2002] ACT (English text signed by the President) Regulations
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION: MTHATHA) CASE NO:966/2015. In the matter between: GCINIBANDLA NELSON GABAYI AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION: MTHATHA) CASE NO:966/2015 In the matter between: GCINIBANDLA NELSON GABAYI AND ANOTHER PLAINTIFFS AND MINISTER OF POLICE AND ANOTHER DEFENDANTS
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT PORT ELIZABERTH
REPORTABLE IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT PORT ELIZABERTH In the matter between: CASE NO: P513/08 KOUGA MUNICIPALITY APPLICANT and SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT BARGAINING COUNCIL COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA CASE NUMBER: 68993/09 DATE: 23 FEBRUARY 2010 In the matter between: COLIN JOSEPH DE JAGER First Applicant SOUTH ROCK TRADING 20 CC Second Applicant And THE MINISTER
More informationChapter 29 Administrative Hearings
Chapter 29 Administrative Hearings 2901 Purpose; Reservations of Rights; Authority The purpose of this chapter is to provide a fair and efficient method of enforcing the Village's regulations through administrative
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO:83409/2015 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 1559/16 In the matter between: SIBONGISENI MGADI Applicant and XOLANI CALU First Respondent TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES
More information±?.M*»t /MM/*- IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) DATE CASE NO: 35343/3063. In the matter between:
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) /MM/*- DATE: CASE NO: 35343/3063 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: ES/NO (3)
More informationOF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Parliament of the Republic of South Africa/ Parlement van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 78 Draft Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Amendment Bill, 2018: Invitation
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 133, 7th December, No. 3 of 2017
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 133, 7th December, 2017 No. 3 of 2017 Third Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago SENATE BILL AN ACT to amend
More informationSTANDING ORDER (GENERAL) 252 THE POCKET BOOK (SAPS 206)
STANDING ORDER (GENERAL) 252 THE POCKET BOOK (SAPS 206) 1. Background A pocket book (SAPS 206) must be used as a personal duty record and as an activity or task record to show all police work performed
More informationThe Farm Implement Act
FARM IMPLEMENT c. 160 1 The Farm Implement Act being Chapter 160 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1930 (effective February 1, 1931). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated
More informationTHE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT Third Respondent
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION,
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January,
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January, 2001 000 No. 3 of 2001 First Session Sixth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06. In the matter between: and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06 In the matter between: THANDILE FUNDA Plaintiff and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Defendant JUDGMENT MILLER, J.:
More informationMUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT
MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT CHAPTER 11:24 Act 39 of 1997 Amended by 7 of 2001 14 of 2004 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 76.. 1/ L.R.O. 2 Ch. 11:24 Mutual
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO: In the matter between: MINISTER OF POLICE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: MINISTER OF POLICE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER
More informationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT NO. 116 OF 1998
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT NO. 116 OF 1998 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 20 NOVEMBER, 1998] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 15 DECEMBER, 1999] (English text signed by the President) This Act has been updated to Government
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Vol. 451 Cape Town 17 January 2003 No. 24279 THE PRESIDENCY No. 115 17 January 2003 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act,
More information.~.b. }.~1-~,g DATE. In t he matter between: (1) (2) (3) REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 14674/18 (1) (2) (3) REPORTABLE: NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO REVISED..~.b. }.~1-~,g DATE In t he matter
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 339/09 MEC FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY Appellant (EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE) and TEMBA MTOKWANA Respondent Neutral citation: 2010) CORAM: MEC v Mtokwana
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Vol. 558 Cape Town 5 December 2011 No THE PRESIDENCY. No Decem ber 2011
Please note that most Acts are published in English and another South African official language. Currently we only have capacity to publish the English versions. This means that this document will only
More informationIN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT MAHIKENG CASE NO.: M66/2016 In the matter between:
IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT MAHIKENG CASE NO.: M66/2016 In the matter between: ABRAHAM PAULUS BISSCHOFF ABRAHAM PAULUS BISSCHOFF (in his capacity as representative of the trustee of the Paul Bisschoff
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) CASE NO. 66060/11 In the matter between: 7 jio p o /^ MTETWA LEBOHANG WILLIAM ( ) MTETWA: DIEKETSENG MIRRIAM (! ) FIRST APPLICANT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. (Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha) CASE NO. 615/08. In the matter between: NTOMBOKUQALA MAKHITSHI NOLULAMO ZAZAZA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Eastern Cape High Court: Mthatha) CASE NO. 615/08 In the matter between: NTOMBOKUQALA MAKHITSHI NOLULAMO ZAZAZA AYEZA NONTOBEKO BOYCE NOMTHUNZI OLGA HLAKUVA NOMAKHOSAZANA
More informationChange of Name Act CHAPTER 66 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, as amended by. 2011, c. 37; 2015, c. 13, ss. 1, 2; 2017, c. 4, s. 75
Change of Name Act CHAPTER 66 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 2011, c. 37; 2015, c. 13, ss. 1, 2; 2017, c. 4, s. 75 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published
More informationCHAPTER 45:05 MAINTENANCE ORDERS (FACILITIES FOR ENFORCEMENT) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
3 CHAPTER 45:05 MAINTENANCE ORDERS (FACILITIES FOR ENFORCEMENT) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Enforcement in Guyana of maintenance orders made in England or
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN
THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN [Reportable] High Court Ref. No. : 14552 Case No. : WRC 85/2009 In the matter between: ANTHONY KOK Applicant
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV Appellant NORTH WEST GAMBLING BOARD
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between JUDGMENT Reportable Case No 312/2011 SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV Appellant and NORTH WEST GAMBLING BOARD 1 st Respondent INSPECTOR FREDDY 2
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT 16 July 2008
STAATSKOERANT, 16 JULIE 2008 No. 31242 3 No. R. 753 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT 16 July 2008 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES ACT, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998) AS AMENDED
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) CASE NO: 16572/2018 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO IN THE MATIER BETWEEN : SOLIDARITY APPLICANT
More informationTHE NATIONAL HUNTING AND SHOOTING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA
ADV H VAN EEDEN SC THE MAISELS GROUP ADVOCATES MEMORANDUM To: JUAN KOTZE ATTORNEYS Date: 4 April 2016 THE NATIONAL HUNTING AND SHOOTING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA 1. This opinion concerns the validity
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: CASE NUMBER: 997/2008 K E MONYE APPLICANT and S SMIT RESPONDENT JUDGMENT. [1] On 29 th April 2008 the Applicant
More informationLatestLaws.com. All About Process to Compel the Production of Things. Under Chapter VII of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973.
All About Process to Compel the Production of Things Under Chapter VII of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 By Pinky Dass Part A- ( Summons to Produce ) The law regarding processes to compel the production
More informationSecond Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 9 of 2017
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 82, 7th August, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES ACT 46 OF
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES ACT 46 OF 1998 [ASSENTED TO 9 SEPTEMBER 1998] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 JULY 2007] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President)
More informationBuffalo City Metropolitan Municipality JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION Case nos: EL270/17; ECD970/17 Date heard: 22/6/17 Date delivered: 28/6/17 Not reportable In the matter between: David Barker Applicant
More informationACTS OF SRI LANKA. Debt Recovery (Special Provision) (Amendment) Act No 9 of 1994
ACTS OF SRI LANKA Debt Recovery (Special Provision) (Amendment) Act No 9 of 1994 AN ACT TO AMEND THE DEBT REVOVERY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT, NO. 2 of 1990 BE it enacted by the Parliament of the Democratic
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. In the matter between:- FRANCIS RALENTSOE MOLOI
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No. : 3861/2013 In the matter between:- FRANCIS RALENTSOE MOLOI Applicant and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL
More informations(;)e)ff... =. YLt.s. '...
1 JUDGMENT (Digital Audio Recording Transcriptions)/aj IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 16494-2018 DATE: ( 1) REPORTABLE: 1il / NO (2) O F INTER EST TO OTHER JUDGES:
More information3. The respondent s decision in terms whereof the first applicant was. review that is to be filed by the applicants within 30 (thirty) days from
2 3. The respondent s decision in terms whereof the first applicant was administratively discharged on 30 November 2009, is set aside and suspended, pending the institution and finalisation of an application
More informationChapter 6 Rail/Channel Tunnel 6.1 Channel Tunnel Security The Channel Tunnel (Security) Order 1994 (SI 1994/570) lays down regulations to protect the Channel Tunnel system, Channel Tunnel trains, and the
More informationSouth Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998
South Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998 Africa Legal Aid Accra The Hague Pretoria ACT To provide for the issuing of protection orders with regard to domestic violence; and for matters connected therewith.
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA KRISHNER(KRISHNA) MOODLEY
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No. : 6911/2008 In matter between: KRISHNER(KRISHNA) MOODLEY Plaintiff and JANE MAY MOODLEY Defendant HEARD ON: 23 APRIL 2009 JUDGMENT
More informationANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF NEW BRUNSWICK
ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF NEW BRUNSWICK 1. GENERAL PROHIBITIONS 2. PENALTIES 3. EXEMPTIONS 4. COUNSELING / EVALUATIONS 5. PROTECTIVE ORDERS 6. RESTITUTION / REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS / BONDING & LIENS 7.
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Case No. : 3234/2012 MARTHINUS PETRUS ODENDAAL AVELING N.O. LIZMA AVELING N.O. GERT JACOBUS VAN NIEKERK N.O. 1 st Applicant/Plaintiff
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between: Appeal number: A1/2016
More informationVIRGINIA Short title. This chapter may be cited as the "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code Act."
VIRGINIA 27-94. Short title. This chapter may be cited as the "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code Act." 27-95. Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context or subject matter requires otherwise,
More informationCHAPTER 3.04 SAINT LUCIA. Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008
SAINT LUCIA CHAPTER 3.04 PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH, CHENNAI. APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2015 (SZ). Versus
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH, CHENNAI. APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2015 (SZ). IN THE MATTER OF: V.V.Minerals Represented by its Managing Partner, Mr.S.Vaikundarajan Tisaiyanvilai,
More informationTHE INTERVENING PARTIES HEADS OF ARGUMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA Case No. 19577/09 In the matter between: DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE Applicant and THE ACTING NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS First
More informationIN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT MAFIKENG
IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT MAFIKENG Case Number: 1661/2009 In the matter between: EMMANUEL TLHAGANYANE Plaintiff and MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Defendant JUDGMENT LANDMAN J: Introduction [1] Emmanuel
More informationINDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT CHAPTER 12:01 48 of 1920 5 of 1923 21 of 1936 14 of 1939 25 of 1948 1 of 1955 10 of 1961 11 of 1961 29 of 1977 45 of 1979 Act 12 of 1917 Amended by *See Note
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN CASE NO: 9366/2017. In the matter between: and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN In the matter between: PUMA SE CASE NO: 9366/2017 PLAINTIFF and HAM TRADING ENTERPRISE CC HABTAMU KUME TEGEGN THE MINISTER OF POLICE
More informationSTANDING ORDER (GENERAL) 307 PROCESSES AND REGISTER [SAPS 264]
STANDING ORDER (GENERAL) 307 PROCESSES AND REGISTER [SAPS 264] 1. Background Every member is, by virtue of section 13 of the South African Police Service Act, 1995 (Act No 68 of 1995) authorised to serve
More informationFARLAM, AP MOKGORO, AJA LOUW, AJA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LESOTHO HELD AT MASERU In the matter between C OF A (CIV) 4/2015 LESOTHO PUBLIC MOTOR TRANSPORT (PTY) LTD APPELLANT And LESOTHO BUS AND TAXI OWNERS ASSOCIATION ADV. BERNARD MOSOEUNYANE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY Case No: 580/11 Date of Hearing: 27.05.2011 Date Delivered: 17.06.2011 In the matter between: BABEREKI CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LIMITED
More information