Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey Second Round Survey Results
|
|
- Curtis Preston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey Second Round Survey Results ( ) October 2014
2 Content Content Page Survey Overview 2 Survey Results 3 Profile of Respondents 8 Cross-tables 11 Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 1
3 Survey Method Survey Overview Random Sampling was adopted for Telephone Interviews conducted by interviewers using CATI (Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview) system Data Collection Period October (Total 6 days) Target Respondents Sampling Method Procedures for handling phone numbers Sample Size Sampling Error Response Rate 37% Hong Kong Citizens aged 15 or above speaking Cantonese All the phone numbers in the latest residential telephone directories were firstly transformed to 6-digit numbers by erasing the last 2 digits. After deleting repeated numbers, a hundred of 2-digit numbers from 00 to 99 were then appended to each number. A database of telephone numbers was finally created and telephone numbers were randomly selected from this database. This method could make the numbers unlisted on the directories may also have chance to be chosen. After successful contact with the household, if there were more than one member at home eligible for an interview, we would employ the Next Birthday Rule method to select the eligible member whose birthday comes soonest. After each dialing, if it was no answer, busy or eligible unavailable etc., computer system would arrange interviewer to try the number again at another day or time. The computer would stop trying that number if there was still no success after 4 attempts. However, if receiving two refusals, attempt will immediately be terminated. 802 Completed Cases Within ±3.5% (at 95% confidence level, which means we have 95% confidence that the sampling error will fall within this range.) The following shows the status of all numbers attempted and the calculation of response rate: Total Numbers Attempted A. Total numbers with Confirmed Ineligibility for Interview (Ineligibles) 8614 A1. Non-working number 7019 A2. Non-residence 578 A3. Fax / Modem / Pager 866 A4. No eligible Living in 151 B. Total numbers with Unconfirmed Eligibility for Interview (Unknown) 6076 B1. No answer (including answering machine) 2780 B2. Busy 571 B3. Password needed 17 B4. Language Problem 48 B5. Without confirming as a household before hanging up 2660 C. Total numbers with Confirmed Eligibility for Interview (Eligibles) 1353 C1. Refusal (including refusal in the middle of interview) 446 C2. Eligible unavailable in survey period 105 C3. Completed 802 Calculation of response rate: Completed / [Eligibles + Unknown x Eligibles / (Eligibles + Ineligibles)] = 802 / [ x 1353 / ( )] = (37%) Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 2
4 Survey Results In order to enable the sample to reflect more closely the characteristics of the Hong Kong population, all data in this survey were weighted against the gender-age-education distribution of those aged 15 or above released by the Census and Statistics Department. Due to the process of weighting and rounding off of decimal place, the sum of individual items in the tables may be different to the total. Table 1: Recently Hong Kong broke out an Occupy Movement, do you personally support the movement? Strongly support, quite support, so-so, quite not support, or strongly not support? N % Strongly Support Quite Support So-so Quite not Support Strongly not Support No Opinion / Refuse to Answer Total Table 2: Regarding the use of tear gas by police to handle the Occupy Movement, do you think it is appropriate? Very appropriate, quite appropriate, so-so, quite inappropriate and Very Inappropriate N % Very Appropriate Quite Appropriate So-so Quite Inappropriate Very Inappropriate No Opinion / Refuse to Answer Total Table 3: Regarding the way of police handling the conflict between the supporters and opponents of the Occupy Movement, do you think it is appropriate? Very appropriate, quite appropriate, so-so, quite inappropriate and very inappropriate? N % Very Appropriate Quite Appropriate So-so Quite Inappropriate Very Inappropriate No Opinion / Refuse to Answer Total Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 3
5 Table 4: Following the decision of the Standing Committee of the People s Congress, Hong Kong Government will propose a draft for the 2017 one-person one-vote Chief Executive election. If the proposed draft will forbid people having different political views from the Central Government to stand for the election, do you think the Legislative Council at that time should approve the draft or reject it? N % Approve Reject No Opinion / Refuse to Answer Total Table 5: (Only those answered Reject in the previous question about universal suffrage on Chief Executive election have to answer this question) If Hong Kong Government proposes a draft for the 2017 one-person one-vote Chief Executive election in which the composition and formation method of the nomination committee is revised in order to reduce political vetting of the candidates, will you accept it? Strongly accept, quite accept, so-so, quite not accept or strongly not accept? N % Valid % Strongly Accept Quite Accept So-so Quite not Accept Strongly not Accept No Opinion / Refuse to Answer Not Required to Answer this Question Missing Value Total Valid Sample= 389 Missing Sample=413 Table 6: (Only those answered Reject in the previous question about universal suffrage on Chief Executive election have to answer this question) If Hong Kong Government proposes a draft for the 2017 one-person one-vote Chief Executive election in which political vetting of the candidates still exists, but the central government pledges to continue to reform the election method of the Chief Executive, will you accept it? Strongly accept, quite accept, so-so, quite not accept or strongly not accept? N % Valid % Strongly Accept Quite Accept So-so Quite not Accept Strongly not Accept No Opinion / Refuse to Answer Not Required to Answer this Question Missing Value Total Valid Sample= 389 Missing Sample=413 Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 4
6 Table 7: How high is your trust in the Hong Kong police force? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no trust at all, 10 being total trust, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? N % 0 No Trust at All So-so Total Trust Don t Know / Refuse to Answer Total Mean # (N) = 5.49 (786) # Don t Know / Refuse to Answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Table 8: How high is your trust in the HKSAR Government? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no trust at all, 10 being total trust, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? N % 0 No Trust at All So-so Total Trust Don t Know / Refuse to Answer Total Mean # (N) = 4.17 (783) # Don t Know / Refuse to Answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 5
7 Table 9: How high is your trust in the Central Government? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no trust at all, 10 being total trust, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? N % 0 No Trust at All So-so Total Trust Don t Know / Refuse to Answer Total Mean # (N) = 4.14 (765) # Don t know / Refuse to answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Table 10: What is your view about the future development of Hong Kong? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being extremely pessimistic, 10 being extremely optimistic, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? N % 0 Extremely pessimistic So-so Extremely Optimistic Don t Know / Refuse to Answer Total Mean # (N) = 4.57 (794) # Don t know / Refuse to answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 6
8 Table 11: Are you considering migration to overseas? N % Yes No Don t Know / Refuse to Answer Total Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 7
9 Profile of Respondents Table 12: Gender Before weighting Weighted N % N % Male Female Total Table 13: Age Before weighting Weighted N % N % or Above Refuse to Answer Total Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 8
10 Table 14: Educational Level Before weighting Weighted N % N % No Education / Kindergarten Primary Secondary (F.1 to F.3) Secondary (F.4 to F.5) Secondary (F.6 to F.7) Post-secondary (non-degree) Bachelor Degree Graduate Studies(Master or above) Refuse to Answer Total Table15: Political Orientation Before weighting Weighted N % N % Radical democrats Moderate democrats Middle/neutral Pro-establishment Business-industrial Pro-Beijing No orientation / not belonging to any orientation Don t Know/ Hard to say / Refuse to answer Total Question: You consider yourself leaning toward which political orientation? Radical democrats, moderate democrats, middle-neutral, pro-establishment, business-industrial, or pro-beijing? Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 9
11 Table 16: Monthly Household Income Before weighting Weighted N % N % $9,999 or Below $10,000 - $14, $15,000 - $19, $20,000 - $24, $25,000 - $29, $30,000 - $39, $40,000 - $49, $50,000 - $59, $60,000 - $99, $100,000 or Above Don t Know/Refuse to Answer Total Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 10
12 Cross-tables Table 17: Recently Hong Kong broke out an Occupy Movement, do you personally support the movement? Strongly support, quite support, so-so, quite not support, or strongly not support? Not No Views Support So-so Total (N) Support / Refuse Sex M 38.7% 22.5% 34.8% 4.1% 100.0% (385) F 37.1% 23.9% 36.1% 2.9% 100.0% (417) Age % 30.1% 7.7% 0.0% 100.0% (112) % 26.6% 25.7% 1.4% 100.0% (189) % 22.8% 44.7% 4.1% 100.0% (303) 60 or Above 29.6% 16.8% 47.1% 6.5% 100.0% (192) Edu Level F3 or Below 27.4% 20.1% 46.0% 6.5% 100.0% (244) F.4 F % 25.1% 33.1% 2.8% 100.0% (279) Tertiary or Above 46.7% 24.2% 27.6% 1.5% 100.0% (274) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 66.3% 20.0% 12.7% 1.0% 100.0% (292) Middle-neutral 26.6% 28.9% 39.3% 5.2% 100.0% (217) Pro-establishment* 1.4% 11.8% 86.7% 0.0% 100.0% (77) No orientation 21.2% 26.6% 45.4% 6.8% 100.0% (182) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 31.3% 20.2% 44.5% 4.1% 100.0% (164) 15,000-24, % 27.2% 34.9% 1.2% 100.0% (137) 25,000-39, % 26.1% 29.7% 0.6% 100.0% (157) 40,000-59, % 22.0% 31.9% 1.7% 100.0% (143) 60,000 or Above 35.4% 21.7% 40.1% 2.9% 100.0% (108) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 11
13 Table 18: Regarding the use of tear gas by police to handle the Occupy Movement, do you think it is appropriate? Very appropriate, quite appropriate, so-so, quite inappropriate and Very Inappropriate Not No Views Appropriate So-so Total (N) Appropriate / Refuse Sex M 23.7% 14.3% 56.1% 5.9% 100.0% (385) F 20.7% 20.4% 51.5% 7.4% 100.0% (417) Age % 15.9% 81.5% 1.1% 100.0% (112) % 21.4% 60.1% 3.1% 100.0% (189) % 18.1% 47.6% 7.9% 100.0% (303) 60 or Above 34.8% 13.6% 40.2% 11.4% 100.0% (192) Edu Level F3 or Below 32.4% 16.1% 40.1% 11.4% 100.0% (244) F.4 F % 15.6% 58.9% 5.0% 100.0% (279) Tertiary or Above 14.4% 20.1% 61.4% 4.2% 100.0% (274) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 9.0% 12.4% 77.8% 0.8% 100.0% (292) Middle-neutral 21.9% 23.5% 47.0% 7.6% 100.0% (217) Pro-establishment* 64.0% 18.9% 10.6% 6.5% 100.0% (77) No orientation 26.0% 17.6% 41.5% 14.9% 100.0% (182) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 32.1% 15.0% 44.9% 8.0% 100.0% (164) 15,000-24, % 23.3% 58.4% 0.8% 100.0% (137) 25,000-39, % 19.2% 54.5% 4.7% 100.0% (157) 40,000-59, % 14.0% 64.0% 4.1% 100.0% (143) 60,000 or Above 20.5% 21.4% 50.0% 8.1% 100.0% (108) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 12
14 Table 19: Regarding the way of police handling the conflict between the supporters and opponents of the Occupy Movement, do you think it is appropriate? Very appropriate, quite appropriate, so-so, quite inappropriate and very inappropriate? Gender Appropriate So-so Not Appropriate No opinion / Refuse to Answer M 27.7% 24.7% 41.6% 6.0% 100.0% (385) F 25.7% 21.7% 42.9% 9.8% 100.0% (417) Total (N) Age % 22.5% 72.4% 2.9% 100.0% (112) % 25.6% 49.7% 5.7% 100.0% (189) % 23.8% 35.6% 8.6% 100.0% (303) 60 or Above 40.5% 19.4% 27.8% 12.4% 100.0% (192) Edu Level F.3 or Below 35.4% 21.5% 30.6% 12.5% 100.0% (244) F.4 F % 25.3% 44.1% 8.3% 100.0% (279) Tertiary or Above 22.5% 22.4% 51.3% 3.8% 100.0% (274) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 11.8% 20.9% 65.6% 1.7% 100.0% (292) Middle-neutral 28.0% 30.5% 34.1% 7.4% 100.0% (217) Pro-establishment* 80.1% 8.3% 10.0% 1.6% 100.0% (77) No orientation 28.3% 25.9% 26.9% 18.8% 100.0% (182) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 35.6% 18.6% 32.2% 13.5% 100.0% (164) 15,000-24, % 26.2% 46.5% 5.3% 100.0% (137) 25,000-39, % 25.2% 47.0% 4.9% 100.0% (157) 40,000-59, % 26.1% 46.9% 3.5% 100.0% (143) 60,000 or Above 32.3% 24.1% 38.7% 4.9% 100.0% (108) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 13
15 Table 20: Following the decision of the Standing Committee of the People s Congress, Hong Kong Government will propose a draft for the 2017 one-person one-vote Chief Executive election. If the proposed draft will forbid people having different political views from the Central Government to stand for the election, do you think the Legislative Council at that time should approve the draft or reject it? No Views Approve Reject Total (N) / Refuse Sex M 40.5% 49.9% 9.7% 100.0% (385) F 32.0% 47.2% 20.8% 100.0% (417) Age % 71.7% 6.7% 100.0% (112) % 58.5% 10.3% 100.0% (189) % 44.8% 13.1% 100.0% (303) 60 or Above 40.5% 31.1% 28.4% 100.0% (192) Edu Level F3 or Below 42.2% 29.2% 28.6% 100.0% (244) F.4 F % 54.4% 9.8% 100.0% (279) Tertiary or Above 30.8% 59.9% 9.2% 100.0% (274) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 21.1% 73.4% 5.5% 100.0% (292) Middle-neutral 40.0% 47.5% 12.5% 100.0% (217) Pro-establishment* 77.5% 11.6% 10.9% 100.0% (77) No orientation 40.8% 29.6% 29.7% 100.0% (182) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 38.8% 35.6% 25.6% 100.0% (164) 15,000-24, % 51.7% 11.4% 100.0% (137) 25,000-39, % 54.2% 10.2% 100.0% (157) 40,000-59, % 57.6% 5.9% 100.0% (143) 60,000 or Above 41.1% 52.4% 6.5% 100.0% (108) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 14
16 Table 21: (Only those answered Reject in the previous question about universal suffrage on Chief Executive election have to answer this question) If Hong Kong Government proposes a draft for the 2017 one-person one-vote Chief Executive election in which the composition and formation method of the nomination committee is revised in order to reduce political vetting of the candidates, will you accept it? Strongly accept, quite accept, so-so, quite not accept or strongly not accept? Sex Accept So-so Not Accept No Views / Refuse Total M 41.0% 38.9% 13.6% 6.5% 100.0% (192) F 39.5% 45.5% 11.6% 3.5% 100.0% (197) (N) Age % 39.8% 10.3% 3.0% 100.0% (80) % 48.5% 16.7% 4.4% 100.0% (111) % 41.2% 9.1% 4.7% 100.0% (136) 60 or Above 37.5% 38.2% 14.9% 9.3% 100.0% (60) Edu Level F3 or Below 42.7% 35.5% 16.4% 5.3% 100.0% (71) F.4 F % 41.5% 13.3% 5.3% 100.0% (152) Tertiary or Above 39.3% 45.8% 10.3% 4.5% 100.0% (164) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 40.8% 41.9% 12.2% 5.2% 100.0% (214) Middle-neutral 49.4% 38.2% 10.4% 2.0% 100.0% (103) Pro-establishment* 26.1% 47.2% 26.7% 0.0% 100.0% (9) No orientation 26.1% 47.6% 16.8% 9.5% 100.0% (54) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 39.4% 35.9% 14.8% 9.9% 100.0% (58) 15,000-24, % 49.0% 4.4% 4.6% 100.0% (71) 25,000-39, % 46.4% 16.1% 7.2% 100.0% (85) 40,000-59, % 43.4% 16.3% 0.8% 100.0% (82) 60,000 or Above 44.3% 40.7% 9.7% 5.2% 100.0% (56) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 15
17 Table 22: (Only those answered Reject in the previous question about universal suffrage on Chief Executive election have to answer this question) If Hong Kong Government proposes a draft for the 2017 one-person one-vote Chief Executive election in which political vetting of the candidates still exists, but the central government pledges to continue to reform the election method of the Chief Executive, will you accept it? Strongly accept, quite accept, so-so, quite not accept or strongly not accept? Sex Accept So-so Not Accept No Views / Refuse Total M 17.1% 21.0% 59.1% 2.8% 100.0% (192) F 18.2% 33.2% 47.0% 1.7% 100.0% (197) (N) Age % 23.0% 60.4% 0.8% 100.0% (80) % 27.5% 55.8% 0.0% 100.0% (111) % 27.8% 45.7% 4.6% 100.0% (136) 60 or Above 12.9% 30.5% 53.7% 3.0% 100.0% (60) Edu Level F3 or Below 15.9% 39.4% 39.1% 5.6% 100.0% (71) F.4 F % 22.4% 55.1% 2.0% 100.0% (152) Tertiary or Above 16.0% 25.5% 57.6% 1.0% 100.0% (164) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 12.3% 23.6% 62.1% 1.9% 100.0% (214) Middle-neutral 25.6% 28.6% 45.0% 0.8% 100.0% (103) Pro-establishment* 55.3% 17.6% 27.1% 0.0% 100.0% (9) No orientation 17.7% 32.7% 44.6% 5.0% 100.0% (54) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 19.8% 35.3% 38.0% 7.0% 100.0% (58) 15,000-24, % 18.2% 60.8% 0.7% 100.0% (71) 25,000-39, % 28.0% 53.1% 2.0% 100.0% (85) 40,000-59, % 31.0% 58.1% 0.6% 100.0% (82) 60,000 or Above 22.8% 18.7% 55.1% 3.3% 100.0% (56) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 16
18 Table 23: How high is your trust in the Hong Kong police force? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no trust at all, 10 being total trust, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? No opinion 5 Tend to Tend to / Refuse to Total (N) Mean # So-so Not Trust Trust Answer Gender M 32.3% 22.0% 43.7% 2.0% 100.0% (385) 5.41 F 25.2% 28.4% 44.4% 1.9% 100.0% (417) 5.55 Age % 19.3% 28.0% 0.7% 100.0% (112) % 23.3% 40.1% 0.7% 100.0% (189) % 24.9% 51.7% 0.6% 100.0% (303) or Above 16.3% 31.4% 46.1% 6.2% 100.0% (192) 6.31 Edu Level F.3 or Below 21.2% 32.0% 42.2% 4.7% 100.0% (244) 5.72 F.4 F % 24.8% 44.5% 1.1% 100.0% (279) 5.41 Tertiary or Above 34.8% 20.1% 44.7% 0.5% 100.0% (274) 5.31 Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 49.1% 22.5% 28.0% 0.4% 100.0% (292) 4.33 Middle-neutral 23.2% 26.5% 49.2% 1.0% 100.0% (217) 5.79 Pro-establishment* 1.5% 13.5% 85.0% 0.0% 100.0% (77) 8.21 No orientation 17.0% 28.6% 49.5% 4.9% 100.0% (182) 5.87 Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 21.9% 27.2% 43.2% 7.8% 100.0% (164) ,000-24, % 33.5% 33.4% 0.0% 100.0% (137) ,000-39, % 16.4% 48.5% 0.6% 100.0% (157) ,000-59, % 27.6% 43.7% 0.9% 100.0% (143) ,000 or Above 25.5% 17.1% 57.4% 0.0% 100.0% (108) 5.96 *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. # No Opinion/ Refuse to Answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 17
19 Table 24: How high is your trust in the HKSAR Government? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no trust at all, 10 being total trust, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? No opinion 5 Tend to Tend to / Refuse to Total (N) Mean # So-so Not Trust Trust Answer Gender M 51.1% 19.7% 26.9% 2.3% 100.0% (385) 4.09 F 45.0% 27.4% 25.3% 2.3% 100.0% (417) 4.24 Age % 14.4% 12.8% 0.7% 100.0% (112) % 17.3% 19.1% 0.0% 100.0% (189) % 28.5% 32.0% 0.3% 100.0% (303) or Above 31.8% 27.8% 32.2% 8.2% 100.0% (192) 4.90 Edu Level F.3 or Below 32.8% 36.6% 23.7% 6.9% 100.0% (244) 4.64 F.4 F % 19.0% 28.4% 0.3% 100.0% (279) 4.05 Tertiary or Above 57.8% 17.2% 25.0% 0.0% 100.0% (274) 3.86 Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 71.1% 15.0% 13.9% 0.0% 100.0% (292) 2.96 Middle-neutral 44.1% 24.5% 28.9% 2.5% 100.0% (217) 4.41 Pro-establishment* 4.2% 24.1% 71.7% 0.0% 100.0% (77) 7.18 No orientation 35.9% 34.9% 25.0% 4.2% 100.0% (182) 4.54 Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 36.7% 29.4% 27.6% 6.3% 100.0% (164) ,000-24, % 30.0% 22.3% 0.0% 100.0% (137) ,000-39, % 21.9% 27.9% 0.6% 100.0% (157) ,000-59, % 15.7% 27.0% 0.0% 100.0% (143) ,000 or Above 51.6% 22.3% 26.1% 0.0% 100.0% (108) 4.13 *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. # No Opinion/ Refuse to Answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 18
20 Table 25: How high is your trust in the Central Government? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no trust at all, 10 being total trust, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? No opinion 5 Tend to Tend to / Refuse to Total (N) Mean # So-so Not Trust Trust Answer Gender M 46.4% 17.8% 31.6% 4.3% 100.0% (385) 4.39 F 48.1% 23.4% 23.7% 4.9% 100.0% (417) 3.92 Age % 11.7% 7.5% 1.3% 100.0% (112) % 16.8% 19.8% 0.7% 100.0% (189) % 28.3% 33.6% 2.7% 100.0% (303) or Above 31.6% 18.4% 37.5% 12.5% 100.0% (192) 5.09 Edu Level F.3 or Below 33.3% 24.7% 32.1% 9.8% 100.0% (244) 4.83 F.4 F % 21.0% 26.2% 2.2% 100.0% (279) 3.97 Tertiary or Above 57.2% 16.9% 24.2% 1.7% 100.0% (274) 3.72 Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 69.8% 17.3% 12.2% 0.6% 100.0% (292) 2.70 Middle-neutral 48.3% 20.5% 28.1% 3.1% 100.0% (217) 4.26 Pro-establishment* 3.8% 14.1% 79.8% 2.2% 100.0% (77) 7.68 No orientation 32.0% 27.0% 31.2% 9.8% 100.0% (182) 4.88 Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 34.6% 22.9% 32.8% 9.7% 100.0% (164) ,000-24, % 26.1% 21.4% 1.2% 100.0% (137) ,000-39, % 19.3% 27.3% 2.7% 100.0% (157) ,000-59, % 15.7% 27.3% 1.3% 100.0% (143) ,000 or Above 49.4% 23.5% 25.9% 1.2% 100.0% (108) 4.13 *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. # No Opinion/ Refuse to Answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 19
21 Table 26: What is your view about the future development of Hong Kong? Along a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being extremely pessimistic, 10 being extremely optimistic, and 5 being so-so, what score will you give? Gender 0-4 Tend to Pessimistic 5 So-so 6 10 Tend to Optimistic No opinion / Refuse to Answer Total (N) Mean # M 40.3% 30.3% 28.6% 0.8% 100.0% (385) 4.52 F 35.2% 37.0% 26.6% 1.1% 100.0% (417) 4.61 Age % 16.6% 31.6% 0.0% 100.0% (112) % 21.7% 26.0% 0.0% 100.0% (189) % 39.4% 31.1% 0.5% 100.0% (303) or Above 29.6% 46.3% 21.3% 2.8% 100.0% (192) 4.41 Edu Level F.3 or Below 22.9% 52.1% 22.8% 2.2% 100.0% (244) 4.68 F.4 F % 28.5% 29.5% 0.6% 100.0% (279) 4.47 Tertiary or Above 47.8% 23.2% 28.7% 0.3% 100.0% (274) 4.54 Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 50.2% 25.1% 24.7% 0.0% 100.0% (292) 4.15 Middle-neutral 35.8% 35.8% 27.6% 0.8% 100.0% (217) 4.75 Pro-establishment* 14.9% 37.1% 46.3% 1.7% 100.0% (77) 5.94 No orientation 30.4% 43.5% 25.0% 1.1% 100.0% (182) 4.58 Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 33.2% 38.4% 25.1% 3.3% 100.0% (164) ,000-24, % 34.9% 28.1% 0.7% 100.0% (137) ,000-39, % 33.6% 28.1% 0.5% 100.0% (157) ,000-59, % 29.4% 27.3% 0.0% 100.0% (143) ,000 or Above 44.8% 22.6% 32.6% 0.0% 100.0% (108) 4.80 *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. # No Opinion/ Refuse to Answer are not included in the calculation of the mean. Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 20
22 Table 27: Are you considering migration to overseas? Gender Yes No No opinion / Refuse to Answer M 22.6% 76.3% 1.1% 100.0% (385) F 20.6% 79.0% 0.4% 100.0% (417) Total (N) Age % 71.8% 0.8% 100.0% (112) % 63.1% 0.6% 100.0% (189) % 80.3% 0.2% 100.0% (303) 60 or Above 7.6% 91.8% 0.6% 100.0% (192) Edu Level F.3 or Below 8.6% 91.4% 0.0% 100.0% (244) F.4 F % 79.0% 0.6% 100.0% (279) Tertiary or Above 34.7% 64.6% 0.7% 100.0% (274) Political Orientation Pan-democrats* 30.8% 68.3% 0.9% 100.0% (292) Middle-neutral 21.5% 78.5% 0.0% 100.0% (217) Pro-establishment* 6.0% 93.2% 0.8% 100.0% (77) No orientation 15.4% 84.6% 0.0% 100.0% (182) Monthly Household Income 14,999 or Below 7.6% 92.4% 0.0% 100.0% (164) 15,000-24, % 79.1% 0.0% 100.0% (137) 25,000-39, % 74.0% 0.6% 100.0% (157) 40,000-59, % 69.4% 1.2% 100.0% (143) 60,000 or Above 34.5% 65.5% 0.0% 100.0% (108) *Pan-Democrats mean Radical Democrats and Moderate Democrats; Pro-Establishment includes Business-industrial and Pro-Beijing. -- End -- Hong Kong Public Opinion & Political Development Opinion Survey (Second Round)( ) 21
Public Opinion & Political Development in Hong Kong. Survey Results. September 21, 2014
Public Opinion & Political Development in Hong Kong Survey Results (Press Release) September 21, 2014 In recent years, controversies over political reforms in Hong Kong have become serious. To gauge people
More informationPublic Opinion & Political Development in Hong Kong. Survey Results. May 27, 2015
Public Opinion & Political Development in Hong Kong Survey Results (Press Release) May 27, 2015 To gauge people s views on various issues about political development in Hong Kong, the Centre for Communication
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE) ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationJob approval in North Carolina N=770 / +/-3.53%
Elon University Poll of North Carolina residents April 5-9, 2013 Executive Summary and Demographic Crosstabs McCrory Obama Hagan Burr General Assembly Congress Job approval in North Carolina N=770 / +/-3.53%
More informationMost opponents reject hearings no matter whom Obama nominates
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE FEBRUARY 22, 2016 Majority of Public Wants Senate to Act on Obama s Court Nominee Most opponents reject hearings no matter whom Obama nominates FOR
More informationSupreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50%
JULY 24, 2013 Blacks Views of Court Turn More Negative Supreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50% FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS Michael Dimock Director
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 10/13/2017 (UPDATE)
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 10/13/2017 (UPDATE) ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationCOMMUNITY RESILIENCE STUDY
COMMUNITY RESILIENCE STUDY Large Gaps between and on Views of Race, Law Enforcement and Recent Protests Released: April, 2017 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Michael Henderson 225-578-5149 mbhende1@lsu.edu
More informationChildren's Referendum Poll
Children's Referendum Poll 18 th Oct 2012 Prepared for the National Youth Council of Ireland Job No: 52012 (1) Methodology and Weighting 1003 interviews were conducted between the 15 th 17 th October among
More informationPUBLIC SAYS IT S ILLEGAL TO TARGET AMERICANS ABROAD AS SOME QUESTION CIA DRONE ATTACKS
For immediate release Thursday, February 7, 2013 Contact: Peter J. Woolley 973.670.3239 or Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 6 pp. PUBLIC SAYS IT S ILLEGAL TO TARGET AMERICANS ABROAD AS SOME QUESTION CIA DRONE
More informationBorders First a Dividing Line in Immigration Debate
JUNE 23, 2013 More Say Legalization Would Benefit Economy than Cost Jobs Borders First a Dividing Line in Immigration Debate A Pew Research Center/USA TODAY Survey FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW
More informationWomen Boost Obama, Pan Republicans
For immediate release Wednesday, Mar.14, 2012 6 pp. Contact: Peter Woolley 973.670.3239 Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 Women Boost Obama, Pan Republicans The president s approval is up in New Jersey, and
More informationOctober 29, 2010 I. Survey Methodology Selection of Households
October 29, 2010 I. Survey Methodology The Elon University Poll is conducted using a stratified random sample of households with telephones and wireless telephone numbers in the population of interest
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL. Sept , ,005 Registered Voters (RVs)
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept. 22-28, 2011-1,005 Registered Voters (RVs) Sample design: Overlapping dual-frame random digit dial landline (75%) and cell phone (25%).
More informationPublic Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels
JUNE 17, 2013 Six-in-Ten Say Opposition May Be No Better than Current Government Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE &
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2015, On Immigration Policy, Wider Partisan Divide Over Border Fence Than Path to Legal Status
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 8, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Rob Suls, Research Associate Bridget Jameson,
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/15/2018 (UPDATE)
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/15/2018 (UPDATE) ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationEU - Irish Presidency Poll. January 2013
EU - Irish Presidency Poll January 2013 RED Express - Methodology 1,003 interviews were conducted by phone using a random digit dial sample to ensure all households, including ex-directory, are covered.
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Negative Views of Supreme Court at Record High, Driven by Republican Dissatisfaction
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JULY 29, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Bridget Jameson, Communications Associate 202.419.4372
More informationTHE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT, AND SANDY GOOD NUMBERS IN THE DAYS AFTER THE STORM
For release Monday, November 26, 2012 8 pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins Office: 973.443.8390 Cell: 908.328.8967 kjenkins@fdu.edu THE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT, AND SANDY GOOD NUMBERS IN THE DAYS AFTER THE STORM
More informationTHE AP-GfK POLL September, 2016
Public Affairs & Corporate Communications THE AP-GfK POLL September, 2016 Conducted by GfK Public Affairs & Corporate Communications A survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates:
More informationRecord Number Favors Removing U.S. Troops from Afghanistan
TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011 Record Number Favors Removing U.S. Troops from Afghanistan FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll Doherty and Michael Dimock Associate
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Concerns about Russia Rise, But Just a Quarter Call Moscow an Adversary
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MARCH 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Alec Tyson, Research Associate 202.419.4372
More informationOpposition to Syrian Airstrikes Surges
SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 Obama Job Approval Slips into Negative Territory Opposition to Syrian Airstrikes Surges A Pew Research Center/USA TODAY Survey FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER
More informationCity of Bellingham Residential Survey 2013
APPENDICES City of Bellingham Residential Survey 2013 January 2014 Pamela Jull, PhD Rachel Williams, MA Joyce Prigot, PhD Carol Lavoie P.O. Box 1193 1116 Key Street Suite 203 Bellingham, Washington 98227
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Divided over Increased Deportation of Unauthorized Immigrants
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE FEBRUARY 27, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Rob Suls, Research Associate 202.419.4372
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Negative Views of New Congress Cross Party Lines
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MAY 21, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Research
More informationTHE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2017
THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2017 Public Approves of Medicaid Expansion, But Remains Divided on Affordable Care Act Opinion of the ACA Improves Among Democrats and Independents Since 2014 The fifth in a series
More informationEMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, am EDT. A survey of Virginians conducted by the Center for Public Policy
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2008 10am EDT COMMONWEALTH POLL A survey of Virginians conducted by the Center for Public Policy Contact: Cary Funk, Survey Director and Associate Professor,
More informationContinued Support for U.S. Drone Strikes
FEBRUARY 11, 2013 Civilian Casualties a Concern, Even Among Supporters Continued Support for U.S. Drone Strikes FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS Michael
More informationLittle Support for U.S. Intervention in Syrian Conflict
THURSDAY, MARCH 15, 2012 Foreign Policy Views: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel Little Support for U.S. Intervention in Syrian Conflict FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center
More informationREPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP. THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011
REPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP OMNIBUS POLL THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011 5 Milk Street Portland, Maine 04101 Tel: (207) 871-8622 www.panatlanticsmsgroup.com
More informationMost Believe Kinder Morgan Pipeline will have a Positive Economic Effect, But a Negative Environmental One
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Most Believe Kinder Morgan Pipeline will have a Positive Economic Effect, But a Negative Environmental One Toronto, March 3 rd In a random sampling of public opinion taken by The
More informationObama Viewed as Fiscal Cliff Victor; Legislation Gets Lukewarm Reception
JANUARY 7, 2013 Obama Viewed as Fiscal Cliff Victor; Legislation Gets Lukewarm Reception FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Dimock Director, Pew Research Center for the People & the Press Carroll
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, June, 2015, Broad Public Support for Legal Status for Undocumented Immigrants
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JUNE 4, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Alec Tyson, Senior Researcher Rachel Weisel,
More informationPENNSYLVANIA 18 TH DISTRICT PASSENGER RAIL AND TWO-PERSON CREW SURVEY JANUARY, Prepared by: DFM Research Saint Paul, Minnesota
PENNSYLVANIA 18 TH DISTRICT PASSENGER RAIL AND TWO-PERSON CREW SURVEY JANUARY, 2018 Prepared by: DFM Research Saint Paul, Minnesota 651-387-5265 Executive Summary: Voters in the 18 th Congressional District
More informationMEDICAID EXPANSION RECEIVES BROAD SUPPORT CHRISTIE POSITIONED WELL AMONG ELECTORATE IMPROVES UPON FAVORABLES AMONG DEMOCRATS
For immediate release Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8 pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins Office: 973.443.8390 Cell: 908.328.8967 kjenkins@fdu.edu MEDICAID EXPANSION RECEIVES BROAD SUPPORT CHRISTIE POSITIONED WELL AMONG
More informationSurvey Report Victoria Advocate Journalism Credibility Survey The Victoria Advocate Associated Press Managing Editors
Introduction Survey Report 2009 Victoria Advocate Journalism Credibility Survey The Victoria Advocate Associated Press Managing Editors The Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute Center for Advanced Social
More informationNorth Carolina and the Federal Budget Crisis
North Carolina and the Federal Budget Crisis Elon University Poll February 24-28, 2013 Kenneth E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Director of the Elon University Poll Assistant Professor of Political Science kfernandez@elon.edu
More information******DRAFT***** Muhlenberg College/Morning Call 2016 Pennsylvania Republican Presidential Primary Survey. Mid April Version
******DRAFT***** Muhlenberg College/Morning Call 2016 Pennsylvania Republican Presidential Primary Survey Key Findings: Mid April Version 1. Donald Trump has built a solid lead over both Senator Ted Cruz
More informationVOTERS AGAINST CASINO EXPANSION, SUPPORT TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND AMENDMENT
For immediate release Monday, July 11, 2016 Contact: Krista Jenkins 973.443.8390; kjenkins@fdu.edu 5 pages VOTERS AGAINST CASINO EXPANSION, SUPPORT TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND AMENDMENT Fairleigh Dickinson
More informationVoters low view of Trump lifts Democratic candidates in governor s races in both New Jersey and Virginia
October 18, 2017 Voters low view of Trump lifts ocratic candidates in governor s races in both New Jersey and Virginia Summary of Key Findings 1. In twin polls in New Jersey and Virginia, a significant
More informationHealth Insurance: Can They Or Can t They? Voters Speak Clearly On Question of Mandating Health Insurance
For immediate release... Tuesday, March 20, 2012 Contact: Peter Woolley 973.670.3239; Bruce Peabody 617.869.4885 5 pp. Health Insurance: Can They Or Can t They? Voters Speak Clearly On Question of Mandating
More informationTHE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2017
THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2017 More Optimism about Direction of State, but Few Say Economy Improving Share saying Louisiana is heading in the right direction rises from 27 to 46 percent The second in a series
More informationInterview dates: September 6 8, 2013 Number of interviews: 1,007
AP Syria Survey A telephone survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates: September 6 8, 2013 Number of interviews: 1,007 Margin of error for the total sample: +/- 3.7 percentage
More informationSeptember 2017 Toplines
The first of its kind bi-monthly survey of racially and ethnically diverse young adults Field Period: 08/31-09/16/2017 Total N: 1,816 adults Age Range: 18-34 NOTE: All results indicate percentages unless
More informationNUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Alec Tyson, Senior Researcher Rachel Weisel,
More informationA Study. Investigating Trends within the Jordanian Society regarding Political Parties and the Parliament
A Study Post to 2013 Parliamentary Elections in Jordan Investigating Trends within the Jordanian Society regarding Political Parties and the Parliament Al-Hayat Center for Civil Society Development Researches
More informationAny Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please
MONDAY, JUNE 18, 2012 Immigration: Public Backs AZ Law, But Also Path to Citizenship Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research
More informationFor release Thursday, Oct. 28, pages
For release Thursday, Oct. 28, 2010 5 pages Contacts: Dan Cassino 973.896.7072; or Peter Woolley 973.670.3239; or Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 O Donnell Winning Tea Party, Losing Delaware Just days before
More information(Full methodological details appended at the end.) *= less than 0.5 percent
This Washington Post-Schar School poll was conducted by telephone March 26-29, 2019 among a random national sample of 640 adults with 62 percent reached on cell phones and 38 percent on landlines. Overall
More informationNovember 2017 Toplines
November 2017 Toplines The first of its kind bi-monthly survey of racially and ethnically diverse young adults GenForward is a survey associated with the University of Chicago Interviews: 10/26-11/10/2017
More informationGoucher Poll Releases First Round of Inaugural Results Marylanders Share Perceptions of Same-Sex Marriage, Immigration, and Expanded Gambling
Press Contact Information Dr. Mileah Kromer Director, Sarah T. Hughes Field Politics Center mileah.kromer@goucher.edu Cell: 724-840-0990 Kristen Pinheiro Director, Media Relations kristen.pinheiro@goucher.edu
More informationMost Say Immigration Policy Needs Big Changes
MAY 9, 2013 But Little Agreement on Specific Approaches Most Say Immigration Policy Needs Big Changes FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS Michael Dimock Director
More information2016 Nova Scotia Culture Index
2016 Nova Scotia Culture Index Final Report Prepared for: Communications Nova Scotia and Department of Communities, Culture and Heritage March 2016 www.cra.ca 1-888-414-1336 Table of Contents Page Introduction...
More informationFor immediate release Thursday, January 10, pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins ;
For immediate release Thursday, January 10, 2013 6 pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967; kjenkins@fdu.edu VOTERS FAVOR BOOKER OVER LAUTENBERG; OBAMA RECEIVES HIGH MARKS IN 2013 Even with a United States
More informationTHE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2018
THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2018 Criminal justice reforms and Medicaid expansion remain popular with Louisiana public Popular support for work requirements and copayments for Medicaid The fifth in a series of
More informationObama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues
MAY 8, 2013 Two-Thirds Say Obama Fights Hard for His Policies Obama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE
More informationMorrissey leads crowded contest for Richmond mayor; voters sour on current City Council and School Board
August 30, 2016 Morrissey leads crowded contest for Richmond mayor; voters sour on current City Council and School Board Summary of Key Findings 1. Joe Morrissey has 28% of the city-wide vote in the crowded
More informationTHE AP-GfK POLL. Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media
GfK Custom Research North America THE AP-GfK POLL Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media Interview dates: September 5-10, 2008 Interviews: 1,217 adults; 812 likely voters Margin of error: +/- 2.8
More informationMEREDITH COLLEGE POLL September 18-22, 2016
Women in politics and law enforcement With approximately three weeks until Election Day and the possibility that Democrat Hillary Clinton will be elected as the first woman president in our nation s history,
More informationPlanning Study Area 1 Burnaby Heights
Neighbourhood Profiles 2006 Census Planning Study Area 1 Heights is bounded by Burrard Inlet to the north, Willingdon Avenue to the east, Hastings Street to the south and Boundary Road to the west. PLANNING
More informationPRRI March 2018 Survey Total = 2,020 (810 Landline, 1,210 Cell) March 14 March 25, 2018
PRRI March 2018 Survey Total = 2,020 (810 Landline, 1,210 Cell) March 14 March 25, 2018 Q.1 I'd like to ask you about priorities for President Donald Trump and Congress. As I read from a list, please tell
More informationTelephone Survey. Contents *
Telephone Survey Contents * Tables... 2 Figures... 2 Introduction... 4 Survey Questionnaire... 4 Sampling Methods... 5 Study Population... 5 Sample Size... 6 Survey Procedures... 6 Data Analysis Method...
More informationNDP Leads Going Into the Final Week, but the Gap is Narrowing
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NDP Leads Going Into the Final Week, but the Gap is Narrowing Weaver most popular leader by far Toronto, May 1 st In a random sampling of public opinion taken by The Forum Poll among
More informationCommunity perceptions of migrants and immigration. D e c e m b e r
Community perceptions of migrants and immigration D e c e m b e r 0 1 OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY OBJECTIVES The purpose of this research is to build an evidence base and track community attitudes towards migrants
More informationBOOKER V. RIVERA AND THE POWER OF CABLE NEWS OBAMA APPROVAL DOWN SLIGHTLY
For immediate release Wednesday, March 13, 2013 Contact: Krista Jenkins Office: 973.443.8390 Cell: 908.328.8967 kjenkins@fdu.edu 8 pp. BOOKER V. RIVERA AND THE POWER OF CABLE NEWS OBAMA APPROVAL DOWN SLIGHTLY
More informationPUBLIC BACKS CLINTON ON GUN CONTROL
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1993, A.M. But Handgun Ban Opposed PUBLIC BACKS CLINTON ON GUN CONTROL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut, Director Robert C. Toth, Senior Associate Carol Bowman,
More informationThe October 2018 AP-NORC Center Poll
The October 2018 Center Poll Conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research With funding from The Associated Press and NORC at the University of Chicago Interviews: 1,152 adults
More informationTHE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2018
THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2018 Growing share of state residents say wo face discrimination Nearly three-fourths say elected officials accused of sexual harasst or assault should resign The fourth in a series
More informationPercentages of Support for Hillary Clinton by Party ID
Executive Summary The Meredith College Poll asked questions about North Carolinians views of as political leaders and whether they would vote for Hillary Clinton if she ran for president. The questions
More informationPENNSYLVANIA: SMALL LEAD FOR SACCONE IN CD18
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Thursday, 15, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationTHE AP-GfK POLL July, 2014
Public Affairs & Corporate Communications THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2014 Conducted by GfK Public Affairs & Corporate Communications A survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates: July
More informationResults Embargoed Until Monday, September 25, 2017 at 12:01am
Results Embargoed Until Monday, September 25, 20 at 12:01am Press Contact Information Mileah Kromer Director, Sarah T. Hughes Field Politics Center mileah.kromer@goucher.edu Chris Landers chris.landers@goucher.edu
More informationNovember 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey
November 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 TOPLINE... 6 DEMOGRAPHICS... 14 CROSS-TABULATIONS... 15 Trust: Federal Government... 15 Trust: State Government...
More informationHalf of Ontarians Believe Government to Blame for Rising Hydro Rates
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Half of Ontarians Believe to Blame for Rising Hydro Rates s and executive salaries well back Toronto, February 21 st In a random sampling of public opinion taken by the Forum Poll
More informationPRESS RELEASE October 15, 2008
PRESS RELEASE October 15, 2008 Americans Confidence in Their Leaders Declines Sharply Most agree on basic aspects of presidential leadership, but candidate preferences reveal divisions Cambridge, MA 80%
More informationHYPOTHETICAL 2016 MATCH-UPS: CHRISTIE BEATS OTHER REPUBLICANS AGAINST CLINTON STABILITY REMAINS FOR CHRISTIE A YEAR AFTER LANE CLOSURES
For immediate release Tuesday, September 9, 2014, 5am 7 pages Contact: Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 (cell) or 973.443.8390 (office) kjenkins@fdu.edu HYPOTHETICAL 2016 MATCH-UPS: CHRISTIE BEATS OTHER REPUBLICANS
More informationSupreme Court Approval Rating Drops to 25-Year Low
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/supreme_court_approval_ratings_drop_to_25-year_low/ U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court Approval Rating Drops to 25-Year Low Posted May 2, 2012 8:36 AM CDT By Debra
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Public Continues to Back U.S. Drone Attacks
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MAY 28, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Directory of Political Research Alec Tyson, Senior Researcher Rachel Weisel,
More informationVoters Divided Over Who Will Win Second Debate
OCTOBER 15, 2012 Neither Candidate Viewed as Too Personally Critical Voters Divided Over Who Will Win Second Debate FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll
More informationPublic Remains Supportive of Israel, Wary of Iran
MARCH 19, 2013 Obama s Middle East Trip Public Remains Supportive of Israel, Wary of Iran FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS Michael Dimock Director Carroll
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2014, Most Think the U.S. Has No Responsibility to Act in Iraq
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JULY 18, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Danielle Gewurz, Research Analyst Seth Motel,
More informationSeptember 2011 Winthrop Poll Results
September 2011 Winthrop Poll Results NOTE: **The margin of error for data using all respondents is +/- 2.49%. Results using a subset of all respondents will naturally have a higher margin of error. Do
More informationAlberta Carbon Levy and Rebate Program Lethbridge Public Opinion Study Winter 2018
Alberta Carbon Levy and Rebate Program Lethbridge Public Opinion Study Winter 2018 2018 Lethbridge College Faron Ellis PhD, Research Chair Citizen Society Research Lab faron.ellis@lethbridgecollege.ca
More informationGauging the Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Gauging the Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Date: October 6, 2009 METHODOLOGY This public opinion research study was sponsored by New America Media. The results and findings in this
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Growing Support for Campaign Against ISIS - and Possible Use of U.S.
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE FEBRUARY 24, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Rachel Weisel, Communications Associate
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S., But Concerns Persist
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MAY 27, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Research
More informationNUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director Rachel
More informationCHRISTIE AND BOOKER FARE WELL IN BLUE JERSEY; NJ REPUBS LIKE CHRISTIE IN
Senate and Gubernatorial For immediate release Thursday, August 29, 2013 10 pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 (cell) or 973.443.8390 (office) kjenkins@fdu.edu CHRISTIE AND BOOKER FARE WELL IN BLUE
More informationMarist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: McClatchy-Marist Poll* Majority Wants Immediate Action
More informationResults Embargoed Until Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:01am. Hogan Remains Popular; Perceptions of the Maryland Economy Are Positive
Results Embargoed Until Tuesday, February 20, 20 at 12:01am Press Contact Information Mileah Kromer Director, Sarah T. Hughes Field Politics Center mileah.kromer@goucher.edu Chris Landers chris.landers@goucher.edu
More informationSTATE GIVES THUMBS UP TO GOVERNOR CHALLENGERS FACE AN UPHILL BATTLE IN 2013
For immediate release, Monday, January 7, 01 Contact: Krista Jenkins 908.8.8967 kjenkins@fdu.edu 9 pp. STATE GIVES THUMBS UP TO GOVERNOR CHALLENGERS FACE AN UPHILL BATTLE IN 01 As Governor Christie prepares
More informationHILLARY CLINTON LEADS 2016 DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS; REPUBLICANS WITHOUT A CLEAR FRONTRUNNER
For immediate release Tuesday, April 30, 2012 8 pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 kjenkins@fdu.edu HILLARY CLINTON LEADS 2016 DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS; REPUBLICANS WITHOUT A CLEAR FRONTRUNNER
More informationTIS THE SEASON TO DISLIKE WASHINGTON LEADERS, ESPECIALLY CONGRESS
For Immediate Release Wednesday, December 18, 2013 6 pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 (cell) or 973.443.8390 (office) kjenkins@fdu.edu TIS THE SEASON TO DISLIKE WASHINGTON LEADERS, ESPECIALLY CONGRESS
More informationFor Voters It s Still the Economy
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 Energy, Terrorism, Immigration Less Important Than in 2008 For Voters It s Still the Economy FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll
More informationNATIONAL: PUBLIC BALKS AT TRUMP MUSLIM PROPOSAL
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 Contact: PATRICK
More informationResults Embargoed Until Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 12:01am
Results Embargoed Until Tuesday, April 24, 20 at 12:01am Press Contact Information Mileah Kromer Director, Sarah T. Hughes Field Politics Center mileah.kromer@goucher.edu Tara de Souza tara.desouza@goucher.edu
More informationWisconsin Economic Scorecard
RESEARCH PAPER> May 2012 Wisconsin Economic Scorecard Analysis: Determinants of Individual Opinion about the State Economy Joseph Cera Researcher Survey Center Manager The Wisconsin Economic Scorecard
More informationMUTED AND MIXED PUBLIC RESPONSE TO PEACE IN KOSOVO
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1999, 4:00 P.M. MUTED AND MIXED PUBLIC RESPONSE TO PEACE IN KOSOVO FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut, Director Kim Parker, Research Director Molly Sonner & Greg
More information