CALIFORNIA PERFORMANCE TEST (CPT) PROFESSOR PAVEL WONSOWICZ UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW
|
|
- Brent Phelps
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CALIFORNIA PERFORMANCE TEST (CPT) PROFESSOR PAVEL WONSOWICZ UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: THE CPT A. Apprach What is the CPT? What methd is best t take the CPT? What types f analyses are tested? What writing methd shuld yu adpt? Hw d yu diagnse yur writing? B. What is the CPT? 1. Create a frm the materials given. Instructin sheet, task mem, fact file, law library 2. Skills tested 1. Reading cmprehensin (must read law and facts practively) 2. Organizatin 3. Cmmunicatin (adpt the prper ) 4. Ability t fllw directins 3. Purpse get thrugh the infrmatin but address nly that which is required in the task mem, in 90 minutes (45 minutes f analysis and 45 minutes f writing) Develp tests frm the statutry, case, and administrative materials Find the facts that apply t the tests t slve a client s prblem Cmmunicate effectively Wrk efficiently by fcusing n ne task at a time Gal: f yur time analyzing/synthesizing; f yur time writing CHAPTER 2: CPT METHOD A. Step #1: Instructin Sheet (1 minute) Read the instructin sheet
2 Nte: 1. The jurisdictin (a mythical jurisdictin) 2. The citatin frm (yu may abbreviate citatins and d nt need t include page numbers) 3. That yu must read all authrity as if it were B. Step #2: Task Mem (4-5 minutes) Read the Task Mem, fcusing n: 1. The pint f view ( r ) 2. The audience ( r ) 3. The gal and assignment Exam Tip 1: Lk fr headings cntained in the task mem. Exam Tip 2: Nte inclusins/exclusins t the assignment, such as whether yu need t write a statement f facts and whether yu need t write persuasive headers. If yu need t write a mem, think abut basing yur frmat ff f the Task Mem. Exam Tip 3: Yu may be asked t d a variety f tasks (such as writing a pleading, an pening statement, a cntract, a will, etc.). Dn t panic if yu get an unusual task. There shuld be an instructin page fllwing the task mem. C. Step #3: Library (20 minutes) Read the Library, starting with the law Start with statutes, the cases will illuminate part f the statute Cases start with the earliest Pay attentin t mandatry v. persuasive authrity Dn t ignre, qutes, r blck qutes D. Step #4: Write the Outline (10 minutes) Use the language f the statute t find the grey areas f law. Refer t the cases t reslve thse grey areas; ask, why is this case here? Nte hw cases intercept. Develp elements and factrs t decide the grey areas. Example 1: Statute prvides that IF a dcument is prepared in anticipatin f litigatin, THEN ne needs t prve substantial need and undue hardship in rder t btain access t the dcument. Cases reveal that substantial = relevant and Cases reveal that undue = n ther surces available Applicatin f fact t law reveals factrs that undue = n depsitin, incnsistent witness statements, passage f time Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
3 D nt ignre issues like the burden f prf and plicy E. Step #5: The File (10 minutes) Read the fact file, fcusing n finding key facts that prve (r disprve) the elements and factrs in yur wrking utline. Delete facts that may be irrelevant. Be aware that facts may cntradict each ther and may be incmplete. Characterize legal relatinships. Insert facts int utline next t element f factr they prve. Create an utline that indicates the rder f the arguments that yu will address. F. Step #6: Write (45 minutes) Pair relevant rules with relevant facts based n yur utline. Use frm if bjective and frm if persuasive. Fllw tne and tasks assigned. CHAPTER 3: TYPES OF ANALYSES; WRITING STRATEGIES; DIAGNOSIS A. What Types f Analyses? 1. Legal Analysis. The mst cmmn CPT. Usually persuasive, ften in mem/mtin frmat. Fllw IRAC, fcus nly n utcme-determinative facts. CA values persuasive headings. D nt ignre any client needs that arise. 2. Fact Gathering. Prve each element r factr thrugh dcumentary evidence. Lk fr the ultimate fact t be prven and divide it int elements. Be sure t write in paragraph frm (nt a list). D nt wrry abut admissibility unless tld therwise. 3. Deep Fact Analysis. Typically tested in a persuasive, lay-audience scenari such as a. The law tends t be relatively clear r undisputed. This tests yur verall thery f the case and hw yu wrk with facts. Examine the weaknesses f the ppnent. Yu may need t spend extra time with the fact file fr this type f analysis. 4. Prblem Slving. Think in terms f client s needs and expectatins. Yu are acting as a cunselr. The gal is t balance the client s needs. Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT) 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC 3
4 5. Ethical Dilemmas. Often a sub-issue. Never ignre a cnflict-f-interest fact. Always err n the side f penness and ethical behavir. Suggest alternatives t ethical prblems. B. What Writing Strategies Shuld Yu Adpt? Adpt the crrect and. Synthesize and apply. Fcus n cncepts, nt cases. Be able t reduce a case t its cre,, and. Cmpare yur rule t the situatin. Keep factual summaries brief. Frm matters: Mem T, Frm, RE: Persuasive Brief captin, very brief fact sectin (unless tld therwise), signature line Opening/Clsing Ladies and Gentlemen f the Jury Discvery Plan depsitins, interrgatries, requests fr prductin f dcuments Letter addresses, intr paragraph, salutatin at the end Grammar and typs matter write in a lawyerlike matter. Persuasive headers If asked t write persuasive headings use: Under / When / Then. Make yur pints. Priritize finishing the exam ver elquence. Nte whether facts are r. Als nte whether facts are. Remember, wrking utlines are just fr yu. PRACTICE! C. Hw t Diagnse Yur Writing 1. Where are yu having prblems? Is it synthesis/rganizatin? (why is this case here) Is it the perfrmance f a sub-task? (priritize, check fr verwriting) Is it a type f prblem? (practice mre in that area) Is it timing? (practice, dividing tasks by time) 2. Mre specific diagnstic issues a. The shtgunner Thrwing everything n paper Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
5 T fix, wrk n yur. Break it dwn pint-by-pint with the mdel answer. b. The tangentializer Nt respnding t the questin, and either nt seeing the sub-issue r fcusing n irrelevant facts T fix, spend mre time with the mre clsely and spend time develping sub-issues. c. The bjectifier Nt paying attentin t bjective versus persuasive T fix, fcus n persuasive reasning. Lk at the Task Mem. d. The brainiac Ges utside the fur crners f the dcument T fix, fcus n the file f the PT. e. The stryteller Turns the PT int a lng, fact-intensive stry T fix, fcus n yur and map why a given case appears in a prblem. f. The legal mind Ignres T fix, fcus n linking an element t a fact. g. The ne-trick pny Tend t d wrse n ne type T fix, get used t perfrmance tests that make yu uncmfrtable. 3. Other tests and tips Try t figure ut why yur analysis is nt ging smthly (remember t be patient with yurself and keep practicing): 1) Cmparing yur wrking utline t the mdel answer 2) Practicing actual PTs 3) Cnsider ding half the test at a time and timing yurself fr each step in the prcess At a minimum, yu shuld d 4 8 PTs. Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT) 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC 5
6 CHAPTER 4: IN RE HAMMOND LEGAL OUTLINE A. Instructin Sheet B. Assignment Mem Editr's Nte 1: This lecture chapter requires use f yur Themis MPT Bk, specifically, In re Hammnd, July 2010 MPT 1. Tne must be t a audience Draft Bdy f Argument nly multiple persuasive headings Fcus n: 1), and 2) Be faithful t ur bligatin t preserve client cnfidences err n the side f. C. Law Library 1. Franklin Rules f Prfessinal Cnduct Shall nt reveal inf regarding representatin Three exceptins: 1) Infrmed cnsent 2) Implied disclsure 3) Paragraph (b) reveal if injury t prperty f anther that is certain t result r has resulted frm crime/fraud where used lawyer s services 2. Franklin Rules f Evidence Elements: 1) Cnfidential 2) Cmmunicatin 3) Purpse f facilitating 4) Legal services Crime/fraud: If sught r btained t enable r aid an attempt t what the client shuld have knwn is crime/fraud Presumed ; ppsing party has BOP by POE; if ppsing party ffers sufficient evidence t raise substantial questin (prbable cause OR sme evidence, unclear in Franklin), must be disclsed t curt Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
7 3. Franklin Criminal Cde Arsn is building f anther Defrauding insurer requires intent t defraud 4. U.S. v. Rbb Federal/persuasive pr-prsecutin Lawyer testifies as t frmer client s intent Plicy: Oldest privilege; full and frank cmmunicatin; nly vilated when necessary Cunter: Lift veil f secrecy when purpse is t facilitate crime/fraud Need sme evidence and then admitted if POE that it fits crime/fraud Here sme evidence met: Midst f scheme, primary surce f advice, recrds prve miscnduct Mre cunter plicy: Dn t want t imprperly fraud 5. State v. Sawyer Clumbia/persuasive/mre recent pr-defendant Mere assertin need prbable cause, as it prtects cmmunicatins unless strng factual basis fr crime/fraud Here, inferences as t n crime/fraud are equally strng may have retained due t fear f prsecutin infrm chices CHAPTER 5: IN RE HAMMOND LEGAL OUTLINE WITH FACTS INSERTED A. Assignment/Task Mem Tne must be persuasive Audience will be legal Draft Bdy f Argument nly multiple persuasive headings Fcus n: Prfessinal cnduct, and Rules f evidence Be faithful t ur bligatin t preserve client cnfidences err n the side f nn-disclsure. In dire financial cnditin Appeared nervus Advised that if invlved in any way with fire, cannt cllect Tried t create DON T REVEAL these facts B. Library 1. Franklin Rules f Prfessinal Cnduct Shall nt reveal inf re: representatin Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT) 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC 7
8 Cmmunicatins here cncerned representatin Three exceptins: Infrmed cnsent, Implied disclsure, OR Paragraph (b) First 2 dn t apply: client specifically requested that inf nt be revealed May reveal if substantial injury t prperty f anther that is reasnably certain t result r has resulted frm crime/fraud where used lawyer s services N here: dn t knw cause f fire, whether he caused fire, r whether he ll file fraudulent claim 2. Franklin Rules f Evidence Elements 1) Cnfidential 2) Cmmunicatin 3) Purpse f facilitating 4) Legal services All met: private cnversatin t explre financial/criminal aspects f fire Hammnd requested that Walker nt disclse cmmunicatins Crime/fraud: If sught r btained t enable r aid an attempt t what the client reasnably shuld have knwn is crime/fraud Has nt filed Nt guilty f arsn, as he N prf that client attrney fr crime/fraud, as may have feared criminal charges against him Presumed privileged; ppsing party has BOP by POE; if ppsing party ffers sufficient evidence t raise substantial questin (prbable cause OR sme evidence, unclear in Franklin), must be disclsed t curt Prf f crime: insured a building that burned dwn due t suspicius rigin; inquired int filing insurance claim; bank lan turned dwn befre fire; failed alibi 3. Franklin Criminal Cde Arsn is building f anther Nt guilty f arsn, as he wns building Defrauding insurer requires intent t defraud Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
9 Has nt filed claim 4. U.S. v. Rbb Federal/persuasive pr-prsecutin Lawyer testifies as t frmer client s intent Plicy: Oldest privilege; full and frank cmmunicatin; nly when necessary Plicy supprts ur client: needed full and frank cmmunicatin t deal with pssible criminal charges Cunter: Lift veil f secrecy when purpse is t facilitate crime/fraud Need sme evidence and then admitted if POE that it fits crime/fraud Here sme evidence met: Midst f scheme, primary surce f advice, recrds prve miscnduct Distinguishable: didn t need a lawyer s help with alleged fraudulent scheme Fraudulent scheme hasn t cme t fruitin, as n filing Nt even sure if fire was intentinally caused by client Mre cunter plicy: Dn t want t imprperly clak 5. State v. Sawyer Clumbia/persuasive/mre recent pr-defendant Mere assertin insufficient need prbable cause, as it prtects cmmunicatins unless strng factual basis fr crime/fraud Hammnd s cmmunicatins need t be prtected, as he was seeking attrney s advice as ptential target f criminal investigatin thus higher prbable cause standard apprpriate Dn t want t hurt attrney/client relatinship Here, inferences as t n crime/fraud are equally strng may have retained due t fear f prsecutin infrm chices Analgus: retained t due t fear f arsn charges Dn t need t retain an attrney t cmmit this type f fraud, as merely need t file insurance paperwrk; thus, didn t btain services f attrney fr crime/fraud Sught frms befre hired attrney C. Attack Outline FRE desn t supprt (Nte: because bth cases discuss the FRE, discuss it first; then, mve t the smaller argument (discussed by nly ne case) if yu have time. Overview f law; presumed privileged; meets elements Adpt prbable cause standard (meets plicy; similar t Sawyer) Under prbable cause, n evidence this was crime/fraud r sught cunsel t further crime/fraud Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT) 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC 9
10 Even under sme evidence standard, prsecutr cannt meet burden (distinguishable frm Rbb) Rules f Prfessinal Cnduct desn t supprt Overview f law N CHAPTER 6: PHOENIX CORPORATION V. BIOGENESIS, INC. A. Instructin Sheet B. Legal Outline Editr's Nte 2: This lecture chapter requires use f yur Themis MPT Bk, specifically, Phenix Crpratin v. Bigenesis, Inc., February 2009 MPT 1. Assignment Mem: Tne: N statement f facts C. Library 1. Rule 4.4 f FPC adpted in 2002 Audience: IF attrney, receives, dcument relating t representatin, knws/reasnably shuld knw, sent inadvertently THEN prmptly Cmment 1: Respnse t Indig; must be Cmment 2: Indig (ntify, dn t examine, await sender s instructin) nt adpted must just Cmment 3: Rule desn t apply t disclsure withut ; Mead gives rule (review, ntify, abide r refrain until curt instructin), but curt desn t create rule 2. Indig v. Luna Mtrs Franklin, 1998, pr-party seeking Attrney disqualified re: dc when examined it, failed t ntify, used t impeach, refused t return Klein case: Disqualificatin is inherent pwer fcusing n ethical standards paramunt cncern is public trust in justice/integrity When privileged dc clearly inadvertently sent, shuld refrain/ntify/await instructin here, cunsel failed t d s Disqualificatin prper if incurable prejudice (Klein) in Indig, btained damaging admissins, can capitalize n cntents at trial, and can perhaps btain similar evidence (turn this case int that we can apply t ur case) Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
11 3. Mead v. Cnley Machinery C. Franklin, 1999, pr-party NOT seeking disqualificatin N authrizatin case (nt an inadvertent disclsure case) Can disqualify if n rule vilatin interests f justice, including guarantee fair trial Plicy: attrney/client privilege encurages fully develped cases If receives and knws, shuld limit review t determining hw t prceed, ntify, abide r refrain until curt instructin Six factrs fr disqualificatin: 1) Knwledge f privilege 2) Prmptness f ntice 3) Extent f review 4) Significance/curing prejudice 5) Oppsing party s fault 6) Oppsing party prejudice via disqualificatin Fn 1: Incurable prejudice is neither nr fr disqualificatin In Mead, n prejudice (can exclude), harm frm cunsel s knwledge is speculative, and high prejudice fr ppsing party t lse cunsel wh develped trial strategy D. Legal Outline with Facts Inserted Assignment Mem: Tne: Objective Audience: Legal Objective mem withut statement f facts 1. Rule 4.4 f FPC adpted in 2002 IF attrney, receives, dc relating t representatin, knws/reasnably shuld knw, sent inadvertently Client cncedes it received a privilege letter But, des nt cncede receipt was THEN prmptly ntify sender Did nt, but did nt get much chance t, as ppnent fund ut same day at lunch seems culd still have given prmpt ntice that day Cmment 1: Respnse t Indig; must be mistaken/inadvertent, attrney/client privilege irrelevant Cmment 2: Indig (ntify, dn t examine, await sender s instructin) nt adpted must just ntify Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT) 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC 11
12 Cmment 3: Rule desn t apply t disclsure withut authrizatin; Mead gives rule (review, ntify, abide r refrain until curt instructin), but curt desn t create rule Because this is an authrizatin case, 4.4 address this issue Is curt implying n rule, r rule in Mead is OK? 2. Indig v. Luna Mtrs Franklin, 1998, pr-party seeking disqualificatin Attrney disqualified re: inadvertent dc when examined it, failed t ntify, used t impeach, refused t return Klein case: Disqualificatin is inherent pwer fcusing n ethical standards paramunt cncern is public trust in justice/integrity When privileged dc clearly inadvertently sent, shuld refrain/ntify/await instructin here, cunsel failed t d s Our case is an authrizatin case and 4.4 didn t adpt Disqualificatin prper if incurable prejudice (Klein) in Indig, btained damaging admissins, can capitalize n cntents at trial, and can perhaps btain similar evidence (turn this case int factrs that we can apply t ur case). 3. Mead v. Cnley Machinery C. Franklin, 1999, pr-party NOT seeking disqualificatin N authrizatin case (nt an inadvertent disclsure case) Is case still valid if curt declined t adpt a rule in this cntext? Or, was curt satisfied with Mead rule s didn t adpt a different rule? Can disqualify if n rule vilatin interests f justice, including guarantee fair trial S, ethical vilatin is nt, must still address Here, fair trial can ccur, as curt can exclude letter, and n ethical vilatin means limited damage t interests f justice Plicy: attrney/client privilege encurages fully develped cases If receives and knws, shuld limit review t determining hw t prceed, ntify, abide r refrain until curt instructin Reviewed the shrt letter, didn t have much chance t ntify (few hurs?), refused t return (but can refrain until curt instructin) Six factrs fr disqualificatin: 1) Knwledge f privilege 2) Prmptness f ntice 3) Extent f review Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
13 4) Significance/curing prejudice 5) Oppsing party s fault 6) Oppsing party prejudice via disqualificatin Fn 1: Incurable prejudice is neither necessary nr sufficient fr disqualificatin In Mead, n prejudice (can exclude), harm frm cunsel s knwledge is speculative, and high prejudice fr ppsing party t lse cunsel wh develped trial strategy Against: We knew (1), didn t ntify (2) (but minimal time t ntify), reviewed (3) (but shrt letter), and ppnent nt at fault (5) Fr: But, under (4) minimal significance and can be cured by excluding we didn t use this infrmatin yet in depsitin and harm is Fr: Under (6), huge prejudice six years f prep, trial in a mnth, cunsel develped trial strategy, tremendus csts t client factrs in ur favr, factrs against us E. Attack Outline Mem frmat Fllw ppnent s frmat? Structure: 1) Cncede it s prtected 2) N ethical vilatin under rule (nt inadvertent), Indig (distinguishable and 4.4 didn t adpt), and Mead (we fllwed its mandates and may nt be gd law) 3) N disqualificatin, as ur 2 factrs utweigh their 4 [END OF HANDOUT] Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT) 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC 13
14 Themis Bar Review, LLC Califrnia Perfrmance Test (CPT)
- Problems with e-filing, especially for people from lower-income backgrounds. - Receiving memos / communication from one side and not the other
State Curt Training Mediatin: Beynd the Basics Jhn Lande and Susan M. Yates Nvember 3, 2017 Linked frm Stne Sup: Takeaways Frm New Hampshire Mediatin Training Mediatins frm Hell - Prblems with e-filing,
More informationDATA REQUEST GUIDELINES
DATA REQUEST GUIDELINES This dcument describes prcedures law enfrcement authrities and individuals invlved in civil litigatin shuld fllw t request data frm LinkedIn and its affiliated service prviders.
More informationOXON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY
OXON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY HOW TO RAISE A CONCERN INFORMAL STAGE Class teachers are the usual first pint f cntact fr any cncerns. Mst cncerns are reslved infrmally thrugh cnversatins
More informationMARYLAND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PROFESSOR RUSSELL MCCLAIN UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW
MARYLAND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PROFESSOR RUSSELL MCCLAIN UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW Exam Tip 1: The Maryland Bar Exam tests n the Maryland Lawyers Rules f Prfessinal Cnduct, nt the ABA Mdel Rules.
More informationIf at all possible, it is strongly recommended that you get advice from a lawyer to help you with this application.
BACKGROUNDER What are my ptins frm here? If yu have been denied Legal Aid and cannt affrd t pay fr a lawyer, there is anther ptin. Yu can apply t the Nva Sctia Prvincial Curt t ask fr a lawyer wh will
More informationCJS 220. The Court System. Version 2 08/06/07 CJS 220
CJS 220 The Curt System Versin 2 08/06/07 CJS 220 CJS 220 The Curt System Prgram Cuncil The Academic Prgram Cuncils fr each cllege versee the design and develpment f all University f Phenix curricula.
More informationTEXAS AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW
TEXAS AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW CHAPTER 1: CREATING THE AGENCY RELATIONSHIP Every agency relatinship must have the principal and the agent. d things n behalf f the
More informationCOURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY
COURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY Gvernment Cde 7284.8(a ALEX CALVO COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICER CLERK OF THE COURT Superir Curt f Califrnia Cunty f Santa Cruz 701 Ocean Street Santa Cruz, Califrnia 95060
More informationCommon Evidentiary Predicates to Authenticate Evidence
Cmmn Evidentiary Predicates t Authenticate Evidence 1. Phtgraphs Rule 901. Identify and cnfirm that phtgraph is fair and accurate representatin f what is depicted. See Huffman v. State, 746 S.W.2d 212,
More informationRole Play Magistrate Court Hearings Teacher information
Rle Play Magistrate Curt Hearings Teacher infrmatin These ntes are prvided s that teachers can guide students thrugh preparatry activities befre presenting a rle play at the Law Curts Cnnecting t the curriculum
More informationCBA Response to Private Prosecuting Association Consultation entitled. Private Prosecutions Consultation. 6 th March 2019
CBA Respnse t Private Prsecuting Assciatin Cnsultatin entitled Private Prsecutins Cnsultatin 6 th March 2019 Intrductin 1. The CBA represents the views and interests f practising members f the criminal
More informationActivities: Teacher lecture (background information and lecture outline provided); class participation activity.
Curts in the Cmmunity Clrad Judicial Branch Office f the State Curt Administratr Lessn: Hw the Appellate Prcess Wrks Objective: Understand what happens t a case when it leaves the trial curts. (Clrad Mdel
More informationCALIFORNIA EVIDENCE ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW
CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: STRATEGIES; SUMMARY OF ISSUES; SUBSTANTIVE LAW A. General Strategies 1. If the call f the questin is silent,
More informationPrinted copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy in Scouts.ca for the latest version.
Prcedure Title: Temprary Suspensin and Discipline Prcedure Number: 13020.1 Dcument Owner: Directr f Child and Yuth Safety Apprval Date: Nvember 13, 2013 Apprver: Natinal Leadership Team Related Plicy:
More informationFLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING
FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING Items in bld fnt are required by Flrida Statutes. If the child cmes int care with psychtrpic medicatin already prescribed. DCF
More informationMASSACHUSETTS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY PROFESSOR ROBERT G. BURDICK BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
MASSACHUSETTS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY PROFESSOR ROBERT G. BURDICK BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION, ADMISSION, AND THE SNITCH RULE A. Practical Tips Tip #1: Whenever yu see a
More informationAGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW
AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW CREATING THE AGENCY RELATIONSHIP Every agency relatinship must have a principal and an agent. Generally, an des things n behalf f the and
More informationORGANIZING A LEGAL DISCUSSION (IRAC, CRAC, ETC.)
ORGANIZING A LEGAL DISCUSSION (IRAC, CRAC, ETC.) Intrductin The rganizatin f yur writing will determine whether r nt a reader will understand and be persuaded by yur argument. Brilliant rhetric will nly
More informationSocial Media and the First Amendment
Scial Media and the First Amendment Benjamin J. Yder Frst Brwn Tdd, LLC Margaret W. Cmey Lcke Lrd LLP Thurs. Feb. 1 & Fri. Feb. 2, 2018 Presentatin Overview Backgrund and develping case law Implementing
More informationCONTEMPT. This packet contains forms and information on: How to File a Petition for Citation of Contempt
CONTEMPT This packet cntains frms and infrmatin n: Hw t File a Petitin fr Citatin f Cntempt It is advisable t have an attrney when filing legal papers t be sure that yur rights are prtected and that all
More informationSubjective intent is too slippery:
Scalia - Cmmn-Law Curts in a Civil Law System Lecture 1: Scalia begins by examining what he calls the cmmn law attitude. Lawyers are trained up in the traditin f cmmn law, distinguishing between cases
More informationFD/FOC4037 USE THIS MISCELLANEOUS MOTION PACKET FOR
FD/FOC4037 USE THIS MISCELLANEOUS MOTION PACKET FOR THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS THAT MUST BE HEARD BY THE JUDGE, NOT THE REFEREE. THESE INCLUDE: Mtins regarding all spusal supprt issues, pst judgment, in all
More informationDEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Month
and a Drug-Free Wrkplace The Cunty f Mnterey Invites yur interest fr the psitin f DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Mnth OPEN UNTIL FILLED PRIORITY SCREENING DATE: Friday, Octber 13, 2017 Exam
More informationNUTS AND BOLTS OF PERFORMING NOTARIAL ACTS. Kathleen Butler, Executive Director American Society of Notaries Austin, TX August 30, 2017
NUTS AND BOLTS OF PERFORMING NOTARIAL ACTS Kathleen Butler, Executive Directr American Sciety f Ntaries Austin, TX August 30, 2017 TODAY S DISCUSSION WHY are dcuments ntarized? WHAT are a Ntary s fundamental
More informationBob Simpson: Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Inuvialuit Regional Corp.
Bb Simpsn: Directr f Intergvernmental Relatins, Inuvialuit Reginal Crp. The Inuvialuit Arbitratin Prcess It is very unique the nly example f binding arbitratin in a land claim agreement; ther land claims
More informationMost Frequently Asked Questions
Mst Frequently Asked Questins f receive a full pardn can have a NO On June 10, 1999 the Gvernr and recrd sealed r expunged? criminal histry recrd. Cabinet determined that the granting f a full pardn des
More informationGuardianship & Conservatorship In Virginia
Guardianship & Cnservatrship In Virginia This bklet is prduced by the Virginia Guardianship Assciatin in cperatin with the Virginia Center n Aging the Virginia Calitin fr the Preventin f Elder Abuse &
More informationMICHIGAN CONTRACTS & SALES DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ANNE LAWTON MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
MICHIGAN CONTRACTS & SALES DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ANNE LAWTON MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW CHAPTER 1: CONTRACT FORMATION AND MODIFICATION A. OFFER General rule: Time perid fr a cntract is a
More informationINFORMATION ON THE SELECTION PROCESS OF JUDGES AT THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT
INFORMATION ON THE SELECTION PROCESS OF JUDGES AT THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT Please read carefully the infrmatin n the selectin prcess f Unified Patent Curt (UPC) judges, the eligibility criteria, as well
More informationMASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ISAAC BORENSTEIN SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL
MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ISAAC BORENSTEIN SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL CHAPTER 1: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND MASSACHUSETTS LAW A. General Principles In rder fr the Furth Amendment
More informationDeferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2014
Deferred Actin fr Parental Accuntability (DAPA) Frequently Asked Questins December 4, 2014 On Nvember 20, 2014, President Obama annunced executive actins t change immigratin plicy. One f these refrms,
More informationAdjourning Licensing Hearings
Adjurning Licensing Hearings Sarah Clver, Barrister and Head f Licensing at N 5 Chambers gives her pinin n a cmmn practical prblem cncerned with adjurning licensing hearings.. An issue which appears t
More informationVideo Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched
Garden State CLE 21 Winthrp Rad Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 (609) 895-0046 fax- 609-895-1899 Atty2starz@al.cm Vide Curse Evaluatin Frm Attrney Name Atty ID number fr Pennsylvania: Name f Curse Yu Just
More informationMeasuring Public Opinion
Measuring Public Opinin We all d n end f feeling and we mistake it fr thinking. And ut f it we get an aggregatin which we cnsider a bn. Its name is public pinin. It is held in reverence. It settles everything.
More informationCALIFORNIA REMEDIES ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW
CALIFORNIA REMEDIES ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: APPROACH; ISSUES TESTED A. Apprach t Essays 1) Determine and analyze the cause(s) f actin in the questin
More informationCalifornia Common Core Content Standards: Writing Grade 11/12
Califrnia Cmmn Cre Cntent Standards: Writing Grade 11/12 11-12.W Writing 11-12. Text Types and Purpses 11-12.W.1 Write arguments t supprt claims in an analysis f substantive tpics r texts, using valid
More informationPENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY PROFESSOR MARK YOCHUM DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
PENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY PROFESSOR MARK YOCHUM DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Exam Tip 1: On the PA bar Exam, 1 part f 1 fur-part questin is devted t PR, abut
More informationPENNSYLVANIA CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR KEVIN P. OATES DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW
PENNSYLVANIA CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR KEVIN P. OATES DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: FULL FAITH AND CREDIT FOR JUDGMENTS Three Main Tpics in Cnflict f Laws: Full faith and
More informationMEMBER PROTECTION POLICY
Martial Arts Industry Assciatin Inc. August 2004 MEMBER PROTECTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT The Martial Arts Industry Assciatin Inc (MAIA) member rganisatins and affiliated clubs, branches and states, is
More informationIndigenous Consultation in Environmental Assessment Processes
Ministry f the Envirnment and Climate Change Indigenus Cnsultatin in Envirnmental Assessment Prcesses Ontari Assciatin fr Impact Assessment Octber 17, 2017 Why cnsult with Indigenus cmmunities during an
More informationGENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 6.3.4 ISSUED: 5/6/09 SCOPE: All Swrn Persnnel EFFECTIVE: 5/6/09 DISTRIBUTION: General Orders Manual RESCINDS 34.1
More informationEyewitness Identification. Professor Nancy K. Steblay Augsburg College Minneapolis
Eyewitness Identificatin Prfessr Nancy K. Steblay Augsburg Cllege Minneaplis The 2016 Criminal Justice Institute August 22 & 23, 2016 The Science f Eyewitness Memry and Identificatin Evidence (Prfessr)
More informationSupervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Profession Act 2008)
Supervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Prfessin Act 2008) It is a legislative requirement that fllwing admissin and the btaining f a practising certificate, a lcal legal practitiner can nly engage
More informationPENNSYLVANIA TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
PENNSYLVANIA TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTENTIONAL TORTS & NEGLIGENCE A. Intentinal Trts 1. Battery Exam Tip 1: Remember that Pennsylvania
More informationPEER INTERVIEW. Conduct a 15-minute face-to-face interview with a colleague
PEER INTERVIEW PART I- The Interview Cnduct a 15-minute face-t-face interview with a clleague This will be cmpleted during class n 11/7 and 11/8 Select questins frm the list belw. Yu can als ask 1 questin
More informationAttending the Coroner s Court as a witness and how to give evidence
briefing July 2017 Attending the Crner s Curt as a witness and hw t give evidence Intrductin... 1 Cmmn cncerns f witnesses... 2 The inquest prcess... 2 Preparing fr the inquest... 3 Yur evidence... 3 Refresh
More informationCh nook Aboriginal Management Certificate Program (AMP) 2015 Application Form
Ch nk Abriginal Management Certificate Prgram (AMP) 2015 Applicatin Frm Abriginal entrepreneurs are the key t building a healthy ecnmy bth n and ff reserve. The Abriginal Management Certificate Prgram
More informationMulti-Agency Guidance (Non Police)
Multi-Agency Guidance (Nn Plice) Dmestic Vilence prtectin Ntices Dmestic Vilence Prtectin Orders Sectins 24-33 crime and security Act 2010 Cntents: Page Intrductin 2 Multi-Agency Engagement 2 Criteria
More informationOFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMMISSION ON ETHICS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AUGUST 3, 2017
OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMMISSION ON ETHICS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AUGUST 3, 2017 THURSDAY COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1:36 P.M. GOVERNMENTAL CENTER I. SWEARING IN NEW COMMISSIONER BY CHIEF
More informationINDIANA UNIVERSITY. Assignment Memorandum
INDIANA UNIVERSITY MAURER SCHOOL OF LAW Blmingtn Assignment Memrandum Date: February 20, 2012 Frm: Prf. Hendersn T: RE: Legal Prfessins Class Mid Semester Presentatins One f the cre cmpetencies f the Indiana
More informationLEGAL BRIEF SMALL CLAIMS COURT JANUARY 2016
LEGAL BRIEF SMALL CLAIMS COURT JANUARY 2016 PREPARED BY NELLIS LAW CENTER, 4428 England Ave (Bldg 18), Nellis AFB, Nevada 89191-6505 702-652-5407, Appt. Line 702-652-7531 SMALL CLAIMS COURT This handut
More informationChild migration (subclass 101, 102, 445 and 117)
Child migratin (subclass 101, 102, 445 and 117) Applicatin Dcument Checklist (Thailand and Las) Hw d I ldge my applicatin? All applicatins shuld be ldged in persn at an Australian Visa Applicatin Centre
More informationThe Genuine Temporary Entrant (GTE) Requirement (Recommendations 1 and 2)
The Genuine Temprary Entrant (GTE) Requirement (Recmmendatins 1 and 2) The fllwing infrmatin prvides further detail n the planned Knight Review changes t the student visa prgram. Frequently asked questins
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN GENERAL COMMENTS This is the packet fr peple wh want t file their wn divrce in Cbb Cunty, and wh d nt have any minr children tgether
More informationNYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum D R A F T Grade 12 Module 2 Unit 1 Lesson 7
12.2.1 Lessn 7 Intrductin In this lessn, students cntinue t read and analyze Henry David Threau s Civil Disbedience. Students read part 1, paragraphs 5 6 (frm The mass f men serve the state thus, nt as
More informationAppellee Strategies in the Federal Courts of Appeal Leveraging Appellate Waivers, Cross Appeals, and Other Proactive Tactics in Civil Appeals
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Appellee Strategies in the Federal Curts f Appeal Leveraging Appellate Waivers, Crss Appeals, and Other Practive Tactics in Civil Appeals TUESDAY,
More informationOpinions on Choice of Law, Forum Selection, Arbitration, and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments or Arbitral Awards in Cross-Border Transactions
Opinins n Chice f Law, Frum Selectin, Arbitratin, and Enfrcement f Freign Judgments r Arbitral Awards in Crss-Brder Transactins With increasing frequency U.S. lawyers are delivering clsing pinins t nn-u.s.
More informationFindings from the Federal, State, and Tribal Response to Violence Against Women in Indian Country Studies
Findings frm the Federal, State, and Tribal Respnse t Vilence Against Wmen in Indian Cuntry Studies Alisn Brks Martin Pstdctral Research Assciate Natinal Institute f Justice 14 th Indian Natins Cnference
More informationNational Criminal History Record Check (NCHRC) Application Consent to Obtain Personal Information - December 2011
Natinal Criminal Histry Recrd Check (NCHRC) Applicatin Cnsent t Obtain Persnal Infrmatin - December 2011 University/Agency Name: Curse r Psitin Title: Applicant details: (Applicant t print all details)
More informationAlternative Measures for Adult Offenders ALT 1. March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1
Plicy: Alternative Measures fr Adult Offenders Plicy Cde: Effective Date: Crss-references: ALT 1 March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1 Sectin 717(1) f the Criminal Cde prvides in part
More informationCriminal Procedure and Evidence. By Zohra Arbabzada
Criminal Prcedure and Evidence By Zhra Arbabzada 1 Cntents Testimnial, Dcumentary and Other Evidence... 3 Relevance and Adducing Evidence... 9 The Hearsay Rule... 11 The Opinin Rule... 15 Identificatin
More information2018 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEW ALBANY CITY COUNCIL
2018 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEW ALBANY CITY COUNCIL APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: Residential Address: Cell Phne Number: Wrk Phne Number: E-Mail: CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS/PUBLIC SERVICE
More information1. Humanities-oriented academic essays are typically both analytical and argumentative.
Analysis & Argument 1. Humanities-riented academic essays are typically bth analytical and argumentative. As yu may recall, the pint f an academic paper is nt s much t tell me a bunch f static facts r
More informationFEDERAL JURISDICTION & PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW
FEDERAL JURISDICTION & PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: FEDERAL QUESTION AND DIVERSITY A. Intrductin t Federal Subject
More informationAdministrative Law II. for Assessment Review Board Members and the Municipal Government Board Members
Administrative Law II fr Assessment Review Bard Members and the Municipal Gvernment Bard Members The materials are Cpyright by the Gvernment f Alberta. All rights reserved. N part f this publicatin may
More informationRecording Secretary Participant Workbook Facilitators: Colin Treanor (UConn 2014) Jake Lueck (Kansas 2017)
The Fraternity f Phi Gamma Delta Internatinal Headquarters P. O. Bx 4599 1201 Red Mile Rad Lexingtn, KY 40544 www.phigam.rg Recrding Secretary Participant Wrkbk Facilitatrs: Clin Treanr (UCnn 2014) ctreanr@phigam.rg
More informationFACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES A QUICK AND UNDERSTANDABLE GUIDE TO COPYRIGHT AND PLAGIARISM POLICIES
FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES A QUICK AND UNDERSTANDABLE GUIDE TO COPYRIGHT AND PLAGIARISM POLICIES Cmpiled by Dr G Myers Witwatersrand Health Sciences Library Nvember 2007 WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? Cpyright is
More informationSURETYSHIP PROFESSOR KARA BRUCE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO COLLEGE OF LAW
SURETYSHIP PROFESSOR KARA BRUCE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO COLLEGE OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO SURETYSHIP A. Suretyship Defined the prmise f a persn t pay the debts (r satisfy the ) f anther. B. Picturing
More informationMASSACHUSETTS WILLS PROFESSOR KENT SCHENKEL NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW
MASSACHUSETTS WILLS PROFESSOR KENT SCHENKEL NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION A. Intrductin When yu encunter a wills and estates questin n the bar exam, yu first
More informationUS ESTA Application Form
US ESTA Applicatin Frm The fllwing questins are mandatry and will enable us t cmplete yur applicatin fr a US ESTA. Please d nt leave any questins blank as this culd lead t a delay in Key Travel prcessing
More informationt <u o: CU 8fe a- (U .Si, CD O Q) Squeaky Clean 1 Lawn Enforcement ICollege Concierge 1 Lettuce-Do-Lunch 1 Jazz My Wheels 'f5 E 3 'u <D u (/) UIO3-
r 'u " Ve~- Squeaky lean 1 Lawn Enfrcement Illege ncierge 1 Lettuce-D-Lunch 1 Jazz My Wheels UIO3- I "a i O c 8fe t
More informationGetting in Front on Data Quality
Getting in Frnt n Data Quality Thmas C. Redman, Ph.D. the Data Dc, in Ciudad Real, Espana, July, 2016 Data Quality Slutins tmredman@dataqualityslutins.cm /Redman-ICIQ-June2016 DQS 2000-2016 T.C. Redman,
More informationRefugee Council response to the 21 st Century Welfare consultation
Refugee Cuncil respnse t the 21 st Century Welfare cnsultatin Octber 2010 Abut the Refugee Cuncil The Refugee Cuncil is a human rights charity, independent f gvernment, which wrks t ensure that refugees
More information2012 CORE COURSE PROPOSAL REVIEW APPENDIX A AMERICAN HISTORY COMPONENT
2012 CORE COURSE PROPOSAL REVIEW APPENDIX A AMERICAN HISTORY COMPONENT Name: Curse Prefix # & Title: TCCN identified fr curse Yes N Curse scheduled X semesters per year 3 2 1 < 1 per AY 1. Rate each criterin
More informationSteps to Organize a CNU Chapter Congress for the New Urbanism
Steps t Organize a CNU Chapter Cngress fr the New Urbanism 140 S. Dearbrn St., Ste. 404 Chicag, IL 60603 Phne: 312.551.7300 Fax: 312.346.3323 Email: chapters@cnu.rg Intrductin The Cngress fr the New Urbanism
More information2017 NSBE DC Professionals Executive Board Candidate s Handbook
Natinal Sciety f Black Engineers 2017 NSBE DC Prfessinals Executive Bard Candidate s Handbk Intrductin 3 NSBE DC Prfessinals Candidacy Eligibility 4 NSBE DC Prfessinals Candidate Certificatin Prcess 5
More informationSUMMARY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXPUNCTIONS. Criteria Filing Requirements Add l Information
Prepared by Dinne R. Gnder-Stanley, NCCU Schl f Law Updated July 2012 by Daniel Bwes, NC Justice Center Type f Expunctin Nn-vilent Misdemeanr r Felny (All Ages) GS 15A-145.5 (Effective 12/1/2012) Criteria
More informationSUBCHAPTER II - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
SUBCHAPTER II - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 551. Definitins. Fr the purpse f this subchapter - (1) ''agency'' means each authrity f the Gvernment f the United States, whether r nt it is within r subject t
More informationLAW SCHOOL ESSENTIALS FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW
LAW SCHOOL ESSENTIALS FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW A. Success n an Exam INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE 1. Learn the Subject
More informationCONTRACT LAW IN GENERAL: R
CONTRACT LAW IN GENERAL: R 1. Cntract Defined A cntract is a prmise r a set f prmises fr the breach f which the law gives a remedy, r the perfrmance f which the law in sme way recgnizes as a duty. R 2.
More informationFDP MEETING REPORT/SUMMARY. Session Info. Activities/Outcomes/ The newly established steering committee was formulated and has been Progress to Date
Online Web Frm Sectin Name Sessin Inf Sessin Name FDP Expanded Clearinghuse Date September 6, 2018 Pint f Cntact Lynette Arias and Pamela Webb Wrking Grup Pst-pilt summary status Activities/Outcmes/ The
More informationTropical Forest Alliance 2020 Overview and Frequently Asked Questions
Trpical Frest Alliance 2020 Overview and Frequently Asked Questins Belw is infrmatin abut TFA 2020 drawn frm current versins f the TFA 2020 Strategy dcument, Gvernance dcument, website and ther crrespndence.
More informationSTALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
STALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these ntes d These Explanatry Ntes relate t the Stalking Prtectin Bill as intrduced in the Huse f Cmmns n 19 July. These Explanatry Ntes have been prvided
More informationMARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW
MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS A. Frmatin f Cntracts 1. Mutual Assent Mutual assent: Offer
More informationImpact of Proffer Legislation Changes
Impact f Prffer Legislatin Changes General Infrmatin n New Statute VA Cde Sectin 5.2-2303.4 Senate Bill (SB) 549 206 Sessin Reprt Senate Bill (SB) 549 New Prffer Legislatin (Handut) Slide 9 & 0 frm Schl
More informationINTEGRITY COMMISSION BILL
The fllwing is the Barbads Labur Party s draft Integrity Cmmissin Bill. We invite yu, the members f the public, t cmment n this Bill as we intend after taking int accunt yur suggestins t have this enacted
More informationGEORGIA CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO-KENT SCHOOL OF LAW
GEORGIA CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO-KENT SCHOOL OF LAW Nte 1: This lecture cvers nly the principal differences between the law and Gergia and the law in yur MBE Cntracts
More informationIncorporating Unemployment Compensation Law Into Your Practice
Incrprating Unemplyment Cmpensatin Law Int Yur Practice February 22, 2017 Presented by: Crey J. Mwrey, Esquire Rieders, Travis Law Firm 161 West Third Street Williamsprt, PA 17701 www.riederstravis.cm
More informationSUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENT. Substituted Judgment--Overview
SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENT Substituted Judgment--Overview An exceptin t the general apprach t judicially-rdered alternative decisin making cncerns medical prcedures and treatment
More informationAnswer: The issue in this question is whether Donny acted in reliance of Ann s offer to get the reward of $1000.
MLC101 OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE Questin: It is the week befre ANZAC day and Ann s huse is rbbed. The thieves steal many items, including her Great grandfather s Wrld War 1 medals. Ann is distraught and puts
More informationEngage MAT DBS Policy
Engage MAT DBS Plicy Date f ratificatin: Nvember 2017. Date f review: Nvember 2018..... Cntents 1. Intrductin... 3 2. Legal psitin... 4 3. Lcal authrity psitin... 6 4. The deplyment f staff... 7 5. Supply
More informationFamily Law Legal Service Providers: Consultation Paper
Family Law Legal Service Prviders: Cnsultatin Paper Alternate Legal Service Prvider Wrking Grup Miriam Kresiv QC, Chair Nancy Merrill QC Craig Ferris QC Jeff Campbell QC Lisa Hamiltn QC September 2018
More informationNorthern Source, LLC v Kousouros 2012 NY Slip Op 33203(U) February 22, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.
Nrthern Surce, LLC v Kusurs 2012 NY Slip Op 33203(U) February 22, 2012 Sup Ct, NY Cunty Dcket Number: 650325/2008E Judge: Paul G. Feinman Republished frm New Yrk State Unified Curt System's E-Curts Service.
More informationROSE-HULMAN COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUITY
ROSE-HULMAN COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUITY USE AND ADAPTATION OF THIS MODEL WITH CITATION TO THE NCHERM GROUP/ATIXA IS PERMITTED THROUGH A LICENSE TO ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
More informationUnit #2: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia
Unit #2: American Plitical Idelgies and Beliefs AP US Gvernment & Plitics Mr. Cia Name: Date: Perid: Thurs 10/18 Learning bjective: MPA-A: Explain the relatinship between cre beliefs f U.S. citizens and
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR VACATING MISDEMEANOR AND GROSS MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR VACATING MISDEMEANOR AND GROSS MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS Washingtn law permits the vacatin f sme misdemeanr r grss misdemeanr cnvictins. Vacatin f a cnvictin releases yu frm all penalties
More informationTrial by Jury. Very different from the criminal law right to trial by jury!!
Trial by Jury Very different frm the criminal law right t trial by jury!! The Right t a trial by Jury The right t a jury applies in civil cases In suits at cmmn law, where the value in cntrversy shall
More informationGUIDELINES FOR GRANT APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION
TOGETHER WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS WORLDWIDE FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION 1. Eligibility Criteria 1.1. Wh can apply? Applicatins received shuld be made by r n behalf f a specific Human Rights Defender in
More informationCAPIC Submission on Part 16: Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR)
2017 CAPIC Submissin n Part 16: Immigratin and Refugee Prtectin Regulatins (IRPR) CAPIC SUBMISSION-PART 16: IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION REGULATIONS (IRPR) Cntents Intrductin... 2 Preamble... 2 Opinin/Input
More informationLogging in. Once logged in, go to the My AAMVA link in the top right of the screen.
Belw are sme general FAQs and answers fr navigating the new AAMVA Awards nline platfrm. If yu have additinal questins, please submit them t awards@aamva.rg and we will be happy t address them. Lgging in
More information