PART XIII PRIVATIVE CLAUSES
|
|
- Felix Robinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PART XIII PRIVATIVE CLAUSES I Intrductin A The Privative, Ouster, r Preclusin Clause Privative clauses are prvisins in a statute which preclude the pssibility f certain frms f administrative review. Typically, they vary the availability f certirari s as t prevent the decisin f a tribunal frm being quashed. Synnyms include uster and preclusin clauses. Such clauses have been cnstrued restrictively by curts. Privative clauses are relatively cmmn in legislatin. By means f such clauses, curts will regularly be denied the pprtunity t examine the lawfulness f administrative decisins. Recently, they have been used in the cntext f migratin tribunals t restrict review. Examples f privative clauses: A decisin by this tribunal is final and cnclusive A curt may nt grant remedy X (eg, certirari) Judicial review is nly pssible fr reasn f X N judicial review is pssible after time Y (time limits) Anything dne by bdy X shall have effect as if enacted by Parliament This decisin shall be self-executing Judicial review is nt available in circumstances A, B, Z Sme privative clauses purprt t cmpletely ust judicial review. Fr example, s 150 f the Wrkplace Relatins Act 1996 (Cth) prvides as fllws: Sectin 150: [A]n award (a) (b) (c) is final and cnclusive; shall nt be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed r called in questin in any curt; and is nt subject t prhibitin, mandamus r injunctin in any curt n any accunt. B Idelgical Tensins Privative clauses exist primarily fr practical and prcedural reasns: Prtecting the integrity f tribunal systems by separating infrmal tribunals frm frmal legal prcesses: curts shuld nt decide, eg, industrial disputes; Ensuring finality: decisins f tribunals ught nt t be appealed and are thus said t be nn-reviewable; Preventing unnecessary litigatin and interventinist curts: tribunals and internal avenues f appeal are said t affrd justice, s t g beynd these measures is arguably unnecessary (hence, eg, migratin privative clauses); Page 1 f 10
2 Efficiency: appeals litigatin cnsumes resurces f curt and Minister In this way, they prtect the integrity f the tribunal system, and ensure that executive and judicial functins are separated in apprpriate circumstances. Fr example, the executive branch has the capacity t issue certificates certifying that disclsure under the FOI Act wuld be cntrary t the public interest. Because this is an essentially executive decisin, privative clauses are used t prtect that decisin frm being undermined by the curts. Hwever, the existence f private clauses des raise cmplex issues: Incnsistent parliamentary intentin prima facie incnsistency between ne statutry prvisin which seems t limit the pwers f the Tribunal and anther prvisin, the privative clause, which seems t cntemplate that the Tribunal s rder shall perate free frm any restrictin (Cldham at 418) Parliamentary svereignty T what extent ught curts relinquish their wn jurisdictin and t what extent shuld they give effect t ne r ther f the legislative intentins f Parliament? Give effect t the parliamentary intentin but, which intentin? Prvisins which restrict the exercise f tribunals pwers? Or privative clauses? Rights f the citizen t access the curts (rule f law) Access t the curts is an essential precnditin fr the peratin f the rule f law; therefre, clauses shuld arguably be read dwn Alternatively, if the cntent f the law must be given effect, then the privative clause shuld be enfrced But what abut the verriding cnsideratin that the Cnstitutin creates the judicial bdies and prvides fr their use by individuals t enfrce their rights and expectatins (eg, natural justice, fairness f applicatin)? Cnstitutinally cnferred jurisdictin The High Curt s jurisdictin t hear applicatins fr certain writs against Cmmnwealth fficials under s 75(v) cannt be abrgated Cnstitutinalism: that cnstitutinal prvisins shuld prevail Sectin 75(v): hw shuld a curt recncile a prvisin purprting t ust the High Curt s ability t review a decisin with its cnstitutinally-enshrined riginal jurisdictin t d s? Clauses cannt ust jurisdictin under s 75(v); hwever, they shuld be interpreted cnsistently with the Cnstitutin where pssible t d s (Cldham) Representative demcracy Suggests enfrcement since Parliament, being demcratically elected, is in a mre legitimate psitin t create legal cnstraints than curts are t review decisins Separatin f judicial pwer Judicial pwer: the pwer t authritatively decide legal rights and interests (Bilermakers) Privative clauses effectively give tribunals pwer t authritatively decide the legal limits f its pwer This wuld amunt t cnferring judicial pwer upn a bdy that is nt a Chapter III curt T give such a privative clause its literal effect wuld therefre be in breach f the Bilermakers principle Page 2 f 10
3 These tensins raise cmplex interpretative issues. Page 3 f 10
4 II Classes f Privative Clause A Clauses Preventing Appeal The phrase final and cnclusive refers t the claimant s inability t appeal a decisin. Hwever, it des nt exclude the remedy f certirari (Hckey v Yelland). Hckey v Yelland (1984) HCA: Facts A medical bard refuses cmpensatin t Hckey n the basis that he had nt suffered an injury in the sense required by the Wrkers Cmpensatin Act 1916 (Cth) Sectin 14C(11) f the Act prvided that The determinatin by the Bard shall be final and cnclusive, and the claimant shall have n right t have any f thse matters heard and determined by way f appeal r therwise, by any curt r judicial tribunal whatsever Hckey seeks certirari t quash t Bard s decisin, n the grunds that it reveals an errr f law n the face f the recrd Issue Des s 14C(11) preclude issue f certirari? Reasning (Gibbs CJ) The subject s right f recurse t the curts is nt t be taken away except by clear wrds If the subsectin had prvided that the determinatin shuld nt be quashed r called in questin, it wuld have been effective t ust certirari fr errrs f law (but nt jurisdictin) Hwever, simply prviding fr final and cnclusive determinatins is nt enugh t exclude certirari Decisin N On the facts, hwever, there is n errr f law disclsed by the decisin B Clauses Denying a Remedy A clause which purprts t prevent a decisin frm being challenged, appealed against reviewed, quashed r called in questin will be effective t ust the issue f prergative writs (Hussein). Hussein v Department f Industrial Relatins and Technlgy (1982) HCA: Facts Sectin 84(1) f the Industrial Arbitratin Act 1940 (NSW) prvides as fllws: (a) any decisin f the cmmissin shall be final; and n award shall be vitiated by reasn nly f any infrmality r want f frm r be liable t be challenged, appealed against reviewed, quashed r called in questin by any Page 4 f 10
5 curt f judicature n any accunt whatsever. (b) N writ f prhibitin r certirari shall lie in respect f any award f (i) the cmmissin r (ii) any member f the cmmissin relating t any industrial matter r matter in which a tribunal has jurisdictin Issue Des s 84(1)(a) prevent recurse t prergative writs? Reasning Only certirari is requested here: there is n jurisdictinal errr, errr f law, r ther basis fr review The wrds f s 84(1)(a) refer t quashed (being the result f certirari and nt ther prcedures) and are therefre amply wide enugh t include certirari, thereby usting it Hwever, s 84(1)(b) takes the unusual step f distinguishing between industrial and ther matters, heavily prtecting the frmer frm review but nt the latter Decisin Even s, the uster is effective and n prergative writ may be issued C Clauses Denying Judicial Review In rder fr a privative clause t perate, the decisin being prtected must fall within its scpe. If it des nt, the clause will have n effect (Osmnd). Osmnd v Public Service Bard f NSW (1984) NSW CA: Facts Mr Osmnd is denied a psitin n the Bard He seeks a declaratin that he was entitled t reasns fr that decisin Sectin 65A(6) f the Public Service Act 1979 (NSW) prvides as fllws: (6) n prceedings, whether fr an rder in the nature f prhibitin, certirari r mandamus, r fr a declaratin r injunctin r fr any ther relief, shall lie in respect f (c) the appintment r failure t appint a persn t a psitin in the Public Service Issue Des s 65A(6) prevent the Curt frm issuing a declaratin? Reasning (Kirby P) Exclusinary clauses are prperly read strictly by the curts Hwever, the language here chsen is very wide It is necessary t examine the descriptin f the acts prtected frm review: here they are the appintment r failure t appint, the entitlement r nn-entitlement r the validity r invalidity f any such appintment Hwever, the appellant seeks a declaratin that he was entitled t reasns; this is an rder that the Bard perfrm its legal duties in issuing reasns; this is anterir t his appintment, s it falls utside the scpe f the uster clause Even if it didn t, the uster clause may be circumvented by ther rutes: the Curt may examine usted cnduct fr jurisdictinal errr (Anisminic v Freign Cmpensatin Page 5 f 10
6 Cmmissin) r denial f natural justice Decisin Appeal allwed; s 65A(6) has n applicatin t the appeal D Clauses Purprting t Oust Cnstitutinal Jurisdictin The High Curt s inherent jurisdictin under s 75(v) f the Cnstitutin cannt be usted. An attempt t d s will be uncnstitutinal. Indeed, any attempt by the Parliament t vest authritative pwer t determine a matter in a nn-judicial bdy (as by making its decisins unreviewable) is incnsistent with its being a nn-judicial bdy (Cldham). R v Cldham; Ex parte Australian Wrkers Unin (1983) HCA: Facts The ACCC makes an rder that a Laburers Federatin has the exclusive right t represent cnstructin wrkers The decisin was wrng (wrkers did nt have autmatic membership f the AWU) Sectin 60(1) f the Cnciliatin and Arbitratin Act 1904 (Cth) prvides as fllws: An award f the cmmissin is final and cnclusive It cannt be challenged, appealed, reviewed r quashed It is nt subject t prhibitin, mandamus r injunctin in any curt n any accunt Issue Can the prhibitin and mandamus be granted by the Curt? Reasning Dawsn J: The prvisin is effective t exclude any general judicial review f the Cmmissin s prceedings Hwever, it cannt preclude the High Curt frm exercising pwers cnferred upn it by s 75(v) f the Cnstitutin because the members f the Cmmissin are fficers f the Cmmnwealth The Cmmissin s rder with respect t a class f emplyees is dependent upn the existence f a jurisdictinal fact (that the emplyees f that particular class are eligible fr membership f the relevant rganisatin) Here, s 60(1) des nt cnfer cnvulsive character n the Cmmissin s finding The rder is therefre beynd the pwers f the Cmmissin and liable t be crrected by writ f prhibitin (A refusal n grund f lack f jurisdictin wuld be a failure by the Cmmissin t perfrm its lawful functin and liable fr crrectin by writ f mandamus) It is nt pen t the Curt t abrgate bth its wn jurisdictin and the cnstitutinal rights f the citizen by treating the Cmmissin s wn decisin n jurisdictinal fact as being prima facie cnclusive Masn ACJ and Brennan J: The jurisdictin cnferred by s 75(v) f the Cnstitutin cannt be usted by a private clause Sectin 60 will validate an rder f the Cmmissin, t the extent cnstitutinally Page 6 f 10
7 permissible, if three cnditins are fulfilled: The purprted exercise is a bna fide attempt t exercise the pwer It relates t the subject matter f the legislatin Is reasnably capable f being referred t the pwer (ie, des nt n its face g beynd the pwer) R v Hickman; Ex parte Fx and Clintn at Sectin 60 is ineffective t prevent prhibitin ging when the Tribunal transgresses the restraints upn its jurisdictin Nt being a judicial bdy, the Cmmissin cannt determine authritatively the questin f eligibility fr membership: s 142A did nt vest judicial pwer in the Cmmissin Decisin Writs can be granted The rder nisi fr prhibitin and mandamus is made abslute E Mdern Apprach A tw-step apprach t characterising privative clauses is currently favured by the High Curt: 1 Scpe Des the decisin fall within the scpe f the privative clause? 2 Hickman Prviss Assuming it des, can immunity frm review be affrded t the decisin? Decisins falling utside the scpe f the privative clause will nt be excluded frm review. Of thse decisins falling with a privative clause, immunity frm attack will nly attach where the decisin represents an hnest attempt t deal with the subject matter cnfided t the tribunal and in reaching which such a bdy acted in pursuance f [its] pwers in relatin t smething that might reasnably be regarded as falling within its prvince (Hickman per Dixn J). It is a functin f cnstitutinalism, cnflicting Parliamentary intentins, the separatin f judicial pwer (Bilermakers) and the High Curt s inherent jurisdictin under s 75(v) f the Cnstitutin that cnstruing privative clauses is an exercise in recnciliatin (Plaintiff S157/2002). Plaintiff S157/2002 v Cmmnwealth (2003) HCA: Facts The Refugee Review Tribunal denies P a temprary prtectin visa P seeks t challenge that decisin n the basis f a denial f natural justice Sectin 474 f the Migratin Act 1958 (Cth) prvides as fllws: (1) A private clause decisin: (a) is final and cnclusive; (b) must nt be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed r called int questin in any curt; and (c) is nt subject t prhibitin, mandamus, injunctin, declaratin r certirari in any curt n any accunt (2) privative clause decisin means a decisin f an administrative character, made under this Act Page 7 f 10
8 Sectin 486A further prvides: (1) An applicatin t the High Curt fr a writ in respect f a privative clause decisin must be made within 35 days f the actual ntificatin f the decisin (2) The High Curt must nt make an rder allwing an applicatin utside the 35 day perid Issue Can the High Curt make such an rder? Reasning Gleesn CJ: Parliament cannt cnfer upn a tribunal pwer t make an authritative and cnclusive decisin as t the limits f its wn jurisdictin, because that wuld invlve an exercise f judicial pwer (Cldham) Legislatin which cnfers jurisdictin n tribunals and which, in additin, purprts t deprive, curts f jurisdictin t cntrl excess f pwer r jurisdictin invlves a ptential incnsistency. A prvisin that defines and limits the jurisdictin f a tribunal may be difficult t recncile with a prvisin that states that there is n legal sanctin fr excess f jurisdictin A clear intentin must be demnstrated befre fundamental rights and freedms will be infringed The Cnstitutin is framed upn the assumptin f the rule f law The clauses must be cnstrued n the basis that the legislature des nt intend t deprive its citizens f their right t access the curts The plaintiff submits that a privative clause purprting t deny the High Curt s jurisdictin t prhibit acts f Cmmnwealth fficers in excess f their jurisdictin shuld be declared invalid Hwever, the Hickman prviss attempt t recncile rather than invalidate privative clauses Giving effect t a statute cnferring jurisdictin whilst als denying review invlves a prcess f statutry cnstructin described as recnciliatin This prcess invlves tw steps: First, t nte that the prtectin is inapplicable unless there has been an hnest attempt t deal with the subject matter cnfided t the tribunal and t act in pursuance f the pwers f the tribunal in relatin t smething that might reasnably be regarded as falling within its prvince Secnd, t cnsider whether particular limitatins n pwer and specific requirements as t the manner in which the tribunal shall be cnstituted r shall exercise its pwer are s expressed that they must be taken t mean that bservance f the limitatins and cmpliance with the requirements are essential t valid actin This apprach, enunciated by Dixn J in Hickman, has been accepted as authritative Sectin 474 des nt prtect a decisin taken in breach f the rules f natural justice This is a matter t be decided as an exercise in statutry cnstructin The issue is whether the requirement f a fair hearing is a limitatin upn the decisin-making authrity f the tribunal f such a nature that it is invilable Parliament has nt evinced an intentin t treat as valid decisins made Page 8 f 10
9 unfairly in cntraventin f the requirements f natural justice Peple whse fundamental rights are at stake are rdinarily entitled t expect mre than gd faith. They are rdinarily entitled t expect fairness. Sectin 474 des nt manifest an intentin t treat unfair decisins as binding If the Tribunal s decisin was taken in breach f the rules f natural justice, then it is nt within the scpe f prtectin affrded by s 474 because nt a decisin t which s 474 applies Sectin 486A als des nt perate in relatin t a purprted decisin made in breach f the requirements f natural justice (at [42]) Gaudrn, McHugh, Gummw, Kirby and Hayne JJ: There are tw steps when determining the applicatin f privative clauses 1) Des the decisin itself cme within the scpe f the privative clause? Privative clauses nly prtect particular kinds f decisins, s any given decisin must first be brught within a clause s scpe 2) If s, des the immunity affrded by the clause apply t that decisin? Clauses are nt t be interpreted literally It wuld be cnstitutinally invalid t d s (s 75(v)) Where there is such ppsitin, it shuld be reslved by adpting an interpretatin cnsistent with the Cnstitutin It is presumed that Parliament des nt intend t cut dwn the jurisdictin f the curts save t the extent that the legislatin in questin expressly s states r necessarily implies Judicial pwer cannt be exercised by a nn-chapter III curt (Bilermakers), s a private clause cannt have the effect f usting all review (this wuld effectively give authrity t determine cnclusively the matter, cnsistent with judicial and nt administrative pwer) If a decisin des cme within a privative clause, the secnd step wuld still have t be satisfied N prtected decisin will be invalidated prvided that the decisin is an utcme f: an hnest attempt t deal with a subject matter cnfided t the tribunal and t act in pursuance f the pwers f the tribunal in relatin t smething that might reasnably be regarded as falling within its prvince (R v Hickman per Dixn J; the Hickman prviss ) These cnstraints are relatively undemanding, but they d exist Here: A determinatin which is invalid fr errr f law f jurisdictinal errr, will nt be a decisin fr the purpses f s 474(2); cnsequently, the privative clause des nt apply the decisin des nt cme within the scpe f the privative clause Sectin 474 f the Act des nt prtect decisins invlving jurisdictinal errr, s it des nt cnflict with s 75(v) f the Cnstitutin and is therefre valid Sectin 474, whilst valid, des nt apply t the decisin impugned by the plaintiff because a decisin flawed fr want f natural justice will nt be a privative clause decisin within s 474(2) f the Act The same reasning applies t s 486A Page 9 f 10
10 This reasning is analgus t the cases cnsidering the effect f unlawful decisin-making Callinan J: The incidental pwer may be applied with respect t the federal judicature Hwever, any limits impsed n the High Curt s jurisdictin in time must be truly regulatry in nature and nt such as t make any cnstitutinal right f recurse virtually illusry as s 486A in my pinin des Sectin 474 is effective t prevent certirari, but will nt cure manifest errr f jurisdictin Hwever, s 486A is invalid 35 day limit effectively denies peple in detentin, withut a lawyer, and withut English language skills, access t the High Curt It is thus cnstitutinally invalid Decisin A narrw cnstructin is preferred Majrity: the determinatin is nt within the scpe f s 474 because nt a privative clause decisin Callinan J: s 486A is cnstitutinally invalid F Statutry Develpments In 1979, the AD(JR) Act was amended t include a s 4, with the effect f nullifying privative clauses in frce upn the cmmencement f the Act. Of curse, the AD(JR) Act effectively has its wn privative clauses. Schedule 1 precludes review f certain decisins, such that a decisin will nt be ne t which this Act applies. In this sense, the Act establishes its wn uster mechanism, having effect in s 3 ( decisin t which this Act applies ). Hwever, general law remedies are unaffected by the AD(JR) Act: s 10. Thus, privative clauses d nt exclude cmmn law remedies just thse issued under the Act. Nte als s 12 f the Administrative Law Act: privative clauses passed befre the cmmencement f the Act have n effect. This is n lnger f any significance tday. Sectin 85(1) f the Cnstitutin Act (Vic) cnfers jurisdictin upn the Victrian Supreme Curt t hear claims in respect f Victrian parties. T exclude s 85 jurisdictin, a prvisin must indicate the intentin t alter (s 85(5)(a)) and prvide a statement f reasns fr ding s (s 85(5)(b)). It will be vid if these requirements are nt cmplied with: s 85(6). Privative clauses are difficult t add in respect f Victrian judicial review prcedures because s 18(2A) requires an abslute majrity in bth Huses f Parliament t effect an alteratin f jurisdictin under s 85. Page 10 f 10
Adjourning Licensing Hearings
Adjurning Licensing Hearings Sarah Clver, Barrister and Head f Licensing at N 5 Chambers gives her pinin n a cmmn practical prblem cncerned with adjurning licensing hearings.. An issue which appears t
More informationActivities: Teacher lecture (background information and lecture outline provided); class participation activity.
Curts in the Cmmunity Clrad Judicial Branch Office f the State Curt Administratr Lessn: Hw the Appellate Prcess Wrks Objective: Understand what happens t a case when it leaves the trial curts. (Clrad Mdel
More informationFACULTY OF LAW LAWS5010 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW EXAM NOTES
R. M.!! 1 FACULTY OF LAW LAWS5010 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW EXAM NOTES Tpics: Judicial Review - Jurisdictin f the Curts Reasning Prcess Grunds f Judicial Review Judicial Review Remedies Decisinal Grunds f Judicial
More informationPART X ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
PART X ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW I Intrductin A Types f Review 1 Merits review Merits review may be available under the fllwing avenues: 1 Avenue f review (a) (b) Cmmnwealth decisin-makers: Administrative
More informationMulti-Agency Guidance (Non Police)
Multi-Agency Guidance (Nn Plice) Dmestic Vilence prtectin Ntices Dmestic Vilence Prtectin Orders Sectins 24-33 crime and security Act 2010 Cntents: Page Intrductin 2 Multi-Agency Engagement 2 Criteria
More information! 1. Scope of Judicial Review - Performed by superior courts - Concerned with legality of decisions - Limited to reviewing executive power
THE NATURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Nature f Admin Law - Branch f public law (rather than private law) - Bdy f law that regulates the exercise f pwer and making f decisins by: Executive arm f gvernment (t
More informationAdministrative Law Problem Question Summary
Administrative Law 1 Prblem Questin Summary What are the main elements f a judicial review applicatin? Frum in which curt (r tribunal), and at what level, shuld the applicatin be brught? Jurisdictin curt
More informationCBA Response to Private Prosecuting Association Consultation entitled. Private Prosecutions Consultation. 6 th March 2019
CBA Respnse t Private Prsecuting Assciatin Cnsultatin entitled Private Prsecutins Cnsultatin 6 th March 2019 Intrductin 1. The CBA represents the views and interests f practising members f the criminal
More information45-47 Part 1: General & Specified Prohibited Conduct Lecture 11: Consumer Protection Law
Sectin Page Lecture 1: The Australian Legal System 1-4 Lecture 2: Intrductin t Cntracts 5-9 Lecture 3: Cnsideratin 10-14 Lecture 4: Capacity, Legality & Frm 15-20 Lecture 5: Term in a Cntract 21-28 Lecture
More informationAlternative Measures for Adult Offenders ALT 1. March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1
Plicy: Alternative Measures fr Adult Offenders Plicy Cde: Effective Date: Crss-references: ALT 1 March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1 Sectin 717(1) f the Criminal Cde prvides in part
More informationBob Simpson: Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Inuvialuit Regional Corp.
Bb Simpsn: Directr f Intergvernmental Relatins, Inuvialuit Reginal Crp. The Inuvialuit Arbitratin Prcess It is very unique the nly example f binding arbitratin in a land claim agreement; ther land claims
More informationThe Genuine Temporary Entrant (GTE) Requirement (Recommendations 1 and 2)
The Genuine Temprary Entrant (GTE) Requirement (Recmmendatins 1 and 2) The fllwing infrmatin prvides further detail n the planned Knight Review changes t the student visa prgram. Frequently asked questins
More informationAlex Castles, The Reception and Status of English law in Australia (1963) pg
4A The Path t Federatin, The Acquisitin f Legal Independence and Ppular Svereignty The Clnial Laws Validity Act 1865 (Imp) pg. 98-102 The Clnial Legislatures The bicameral legislatures (tw huses) were
More informationCARL Backgrounder on the New Citizenship Act (formerly Bill C-24) INTRODUCTION
Primary Authr: Aris Daghighian CARL Backgrunder n the New Citizenship Act (frmerly Bill C-24) INTRODUCTION The Stephen Harper Cnservative gvernment s Bill C-24 amending the Citizenship Act is nw law, having
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Administrative Law Table f Cntents INTRODUCTION TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 5 (A) RATIONALE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 5 (B) REMEDIES AVAILABLE 5 (C) RECAP OF PUBLIC LAW 6 (D) LEGALITY / MERITS DISTINCTION QUINN
More informationSubjective intent is too slippery:
Scalia - Cmmn-Law Curts in a Civil Law System Lecture 1: Scalia begins by examining what he calls the cmmn law attitude. Lawyers are trained up in the traditin f cmmn law, distinguishing between cases
More informationPART I THEMES AND INSTITUTIONS
PART I THEMES AND INSTITUTIONS I Intrductin and Framewrk 1 A Histrical Cntext The British Parliament culd make law binding upn the Australian Cmmnwealth until 1942. 2 States cntinued t be bund by British
More informationDATA REQUEST GUIDELINES
DATA REQUEST GUIDELINES This dcument describes prcedures law enfrcement authrities and individuals invlved in civil litigatin shuld fllw t request data frm LinkedIn and its affiliated service prviders.
More informationSupervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Profession Act 2008)
Supervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Prfessin Act 2008) It is a legislative requirement that fllwing admissin and the btaining f a practising certificate, a lcal legal practitiner can nly engage
More informationCONSTITUTION OF INDIA
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Sample : Amendments t Cnstitutin Delhi Law Academy India s Finest Law Caching Judicial Services, LLM Entrance www.delhilawacademy.cm All materials, cpyrights and trademarks are rights
More informationOXON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY
OXON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY HOW TO RAISE A CONCERN INFORMAL STAGE Class teachers are the usual first pint f cntact fr any cncerns. Mst cncerns are reslved infrmally thrugh cnversatins
More informationSTALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
STALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these ntes d These Explanatry Ntes relate t the Stalking Prtectin Bill as intrduced in the Huse f Cmmns n 19 July. These Explanatry Ntes have been prvided
More information! EQUITY! LAWS%2015%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!
EQUITY LAWS%2015% 1 TheHistryandNaturefEquity WhatisEquity?HistryandNaturefEquity Equityreferstthebdyfcases,maxims,dctrines,rules,principlesandremediesthatderive frmthespecificjurisdictinestablishedbythecurtfchancery.itremainsakeypillarfthe
More informationCONTRACT LAW IN GENERAL: R
CONTRACT LAW IN GENERAL: R 1. Cntract Defined A cntract is a prmise r a set f prmises fr the breach f which the law gives a remedy, r the perfrmance f which the law in sme way recgnizes as a duty. R 2.
More informationIntroduction. Page 1 of 89
Intrductin Cnstitutinal rts: Australian cnstitutin is hybrid f ideas f mdels. Primarily taken frm US stressed need t prtect peple against pwer f gvernment by distributing and dismembering pwer in ways
More informationOpinions on Choice of Law, Forum Selection, Arbitration, and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments or Arbitral Awards in Cross-Border Transactions
Opinins n Chice f Law, Frum Selectin, Arbitratin, and Enfrcement f Freign Judgments r Arbitral Awards in Crss-Brder Transactins With increasing frequency U.S. lawyers are delivering clsing pinins t nn-u.s.
More informationGuardianship & Conservatorship In Virginia
Guardianship & Cnservatrship In Virginia This bklet is prduced by the Virginia Guardianship Assciatin in cperatin with the Virginia Center n Aging the Virginia Calitin fr the Preventin f Elder Abuse &
More informationSUBCHAPTER II - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
SUBCHAPTER II - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 551. Definitins. Fr the purpse f this subchapter - (1) ''agency'' means each authrity f the Gvernment f the United States, whether r nt it is within r subject t
More informationSTALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
STALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these ntes d These Explanatry Ntes relate t the Stalking Prtectin Bill as brught frm the Huse f Cmmns n 26 Nvember 2018 (HL Bill 145). These Explanatry Ntes
More informationWITH RECENT CHANGES ISSUED BY THE CFPB, FINAL REMITTANCE TRANSFER REGULATIONS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2013
Financial Institutins Client Service Grup T: Our Clients and Friends September 19, 2012 WITH RECENT CHANGES ISSUED BY THE CFPB, FINAL REMITTANCE TRANSFER REGULATIONS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2013
More informationThe Judicial Branch. I. The Structure of the Judicial Branch: *U.S. Supreme Court
I. The Structure f the Judicial Branch: The judicial pwer f the United States, shall be vested in ne Supreme Curt, and in such inferir curts as the Cngress may frm time t time rdain and establish. The
More informationPENNSYLVANIA CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR KEVIN P. OATES DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW
PENNSYLVANIA CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR KEVIN P. OATES DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: FULL FAITH AND CREDIT FOR JUDGMENTS Three Main Tpics in Cnflict f Laws: Full faith and
More informationSenate Bill 549 New Proffer Legislation
Senate Bill 549 New Prffer Legislatin Effect: Created Virginia Cde 15.2-2303.4, which limits the ability f lcal gvernments t request/accept prffers fr residential reznings/prffer amendments. 1 Applicability:
More informationCOURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY
COURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY Gvernment Cde 7284.8(a ALEX CALVO COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICER CLERK OF THE COURT Superir Curt f Califrnia Cunty f Santa Cruz 701 Ocean Street Santa Cruz, Califrnia 95060
More informationINTEGRITY COMMISSION BILL
The fllwing is the Barbads Labur Party s draft Integrity Cmmissin Bill. We invite yu, the members f the public, t cmment n this Bill as we intend after taking int accunt yur suggestins t have this enacted
More informationREGISTERED STUDENT ORGANIZATION LEADERSHIP TEAM Drafted on: April 25, 2013
Cnstitutin Guide G E O R G E M A S O N U N I V E R S I T Y Student Invlvement The fllwing is an example f an RSO Cnstitutin. Nt all infrmatin in the belw dcument is representative f the RSO Leadership
More informationWest Tankers applies, so the Commercial Court points to other options in Nori Holdings Ltd v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm)
Maritime Bulletin Issue 8 www.4pumpcurt.cm West Tankers applies, s the Cmmercial Curt pints t ther ptins in Nri Hldings Ltd v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Cmm) Clarity has been restred fllwing the High
More informationPrinted copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy in Scouts.ca for the latest version.
Prcedure Title: Temprary Suspensin and Discipline Prcedure Number: 13020.1 Dcument Owner: Directr f Child and Yuth Safety Apprval Date: Nvember 13, 2013 Apprver: Natinal Leadership Team Related Plicy:
More informationLEGAL THEORY / JURISPRUDENCE SUMMARY
LEGAL THEORY / JURISPRUDENCE SUMMARY LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 POSITIVISM AND THE NATION OF LAW/S 5 What is legal system? 5 Obligatin 5 Law as a System f Rules 6 Legal Obligatins and Mrality
More information1. Humanities-oriented academic essays are typically both analytical and argumentative.
Analysis & Argument 1. Humanities-riented academic essays are typically bth analytical and argumentative. As yu may recall, the pint f an academic paper is nt s much t tell me a bunch f static facts r
More informationSUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AMENDMENT BILL [B2B 2017] TABLE OF CONTENTS
12 May 2017 1 SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AMENDMENT BILL [B2B 2017] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. COURT CASES... 3 3. ANALYSING THE CPA BILL [B2-2017]... 12 4. SOURCES...
More informationIncorporating Unemployment Compensation Law Into Your Practice
Incrprating Unemplyment Cmpensatin Law Int Yur Practice February 22, 2017 Presented by: Crey J. Mwrey, Esquire Rieders, Travis Law Firm 161 West Third Street Williamsprt, PA 17701 www.riederstravis.cm
More informationAdministrative Law A
Administrative Law A Week 1 Intrductin t Administrative Law WHY DO WE NEED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW? The pwer which a multiple millinaire, wh may be my neighbr and perhaps my emplyer, has ver me is very much
More informationIf at all possible, it is strongly recommended that you get advice from a lawyer to help you with this application.
BACKGROUNDER What are my ptins frm here? If yu have been denied Legal Aid and cannt affrd t pay fr a lawyer, there is anther ptin. Yu can apply t the Nva Sctia Prvincial Curt t ask fr a lawyer wh will
More informationCONTEMPT. This packet contains forms and information on: How to File a Petition for Citation of Contempt
CONTEMPT This packet cntains frms and infrmatin n: Hw t File a Petitin fr Citatin f Cntempt It is advisable t have an attrney when filing legal papers t be sure that yur rights are prtected and that all
More informationREQUEST TO ARBITRATE
FORM 1 BUILDER ARBITRATION FORUM REQUEST TO ARBITRATE Nte: All parts f this frm including Schedule A must be cmpleted in rder t cmmence an arbitratin. Builder s Infrmatin Registratin Number: Cmpany Name:
More informationPENNSYLVANIA TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
PENNSYLVANIA TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTENTIONAL TORTS & NEGLIGENCE A. Intentinal Trts 1. Battery Exam Tip 1: Remember that Pennsylvania
More informationIt becomes relevant when looking at a purposive power. Some powers are purposive.
External affairs Purpsive pwer and prprtinality test We dn t lk at the purpse f the pwer n subject matter characterisatin when lking at whether r nt the Cth is valid It becmes relevant when lking at a
More informationPART III THE PARLIAMENT
Cnstitutinal and Administrative Law PART III THE PARLIAMENT I Representative Demcracy A The Cncept f Representative Demcracy Cass and Rubenstein describe three ntins f representatin inherent in the idea
More informationFLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING
FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING Items in bld fnt are required by Flrida Statutes. If the child cmes int care with psychtrpic medicatin already prescribed. DCF
More informationdue date: Monday, August 31 (first day of school) estimated time: 3 hours (for planning purposes only; work until you finish)
AP Gvernment Summer Wrk 2015 due date: Mnday, August 31 (first day f schl) estimated time: 3 hurs (fr planning purpses nly; wrk until yu finish) Yur assignment is t read the U. S. Cnstitutin and answer
More informationDispute Resolution Around the World. Venezuela
Dispute Reslutin Arund the Wrld Venezuela Dispute Reslutin Arund the Wrld Venezuela 2009 Dispute Reslutin Arund the Wrld Venezuela Table f Cntents 1. Natinal Cnstitutin... 1 2. Internatinal Treaties:
More informationWritten Submission of the International Commission of Jurists
Written Submissin f the Internatinal Cmmissin f Jurists First infrmal thematic sessin Human rights f all migrants in the prcess fr a Glbal Cmpact fr safe, rderly and regular migratin THE ROLE OF JUDGES
More informationNUTS AND BOLTS OF PERFORMING NOTARIAL ACTS. Kathleen Butler, Executive Director American Society of Notaries Austin, TX August 30, 2017
NUTS AND BOLTS OF PERFORMING NOTARIAL ACTS Kathleen Butler, Executive Directr American Sciety f Ntaries Austin, TX August 30, 2017 TODAY S DISCUSSION WHY are dcuments ntarized? WHAT are a Ntary s fundamental
More informationAttending the Coroner s Court as a witness and how to give evidence
briefing July 2017 Attending the Crner s Curt as a witness and hw t give evidence Intrductin... 1 Cmmn cncerns f witnesses... 2 The inquest prcess... 2 Preparing fr the inquest... 3 Yur evidence... 3 Refresh
More informationJoan DUBAERE Racine & Vergels
LUGANO CONVENTION - Curt Case, initiated n 21 December 2009 by Belgium against Switzerland Belgium vs. Switzerland cncerning the interpretatin and applicatin f the Lugan Cnventin n jurisdictin and the
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 July 2000 (28.07) (OR. fr) 10242/00 LIMITE ASILE 30
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 July 2000 (28.07) (OR. fr) 10242/00 LIMITE ASILE 30 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS frm : Asylum Wrking Party n : 7 July 2000 N. prev. dc.: 9703/00 ASILE 28 Subject: Cnditins
More informationNova Scotia Nominee Program NSNP Demand 200 Employer Information
Nva Sctia Nminee Prgram NSNP Demand 200 Emplyer Infrmatin _ This frm must be cmpleted and signed by the emplyer supprting an NSNP 100 applicatin. It is nt an emplyment cntract, but verifies that an ffer
More informationChapter 16 Outline. Judicial review is the check that federal courts have against the other two branches of government
Chapter 16 Outline Intr: Judicial review is the check that federal curts have against the ther tw branches f gvernment At ne time, there was much cntrversy n whether it was right t give the judiciary the
More informationThe Terrorism Act 2000 came into force on 20 July
The Terrrism Act 2000: an analysis --* by Dr C Chatterjee The Terrrism Act 2000 cmpletely refrms the law cncerning preventin f terrrism in the United Kingdm, albeit with sme exceptins; furthermre, it applies
More informationIEEE Tellers Committee Operations Manual
IEEE Tellers Cmmittee Operatins Manual IEEE 445 Hes Lane Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA Apprved by the IEEE Bard f Directrs Updated in June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - RESPONSIBILITIES... 3 FUNCTIONS
More informationMHA or MCA a more flexible approach?
briefing 18 September 2013 MHA r MCA a mre flexible apprach? Fllwing the judgment in Re A v SLAM, readers shuld cnsider the prcess they fllw fr deciding whether t admit r discharge patients wh lack capacity.
More informationADMINISTRATIVE LAW Kristina Gallo
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Kristina Gall Cntents INTRODUCTION... 4 Intrductin-Curse Overview and Cncepts... 4 Reading Ntes-Intrductin... 6 Baker v Canada... 13 The Rule f Law... 24 A Cnstitutinal Basis fr Judicial
More informationCALIFORNIA REMEDIES ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW
CALIFORNIA REMEDIES ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: APPROACH; ISSUES TESTED A. Apprach t Essays 1) Determine and analyze the cause(s) f actin in the questin
More informationNational Criminal History Record Check (NCHRC) Application Consent to Obtain Personal Information - December 2011
Natinal Criminal Histry Recrd Check (NCHRC) Applicatin Cnsent t Obtain Persnal Infrmatin - December 2011 University/Agency Name: Curse r Psitin Title: Applicant details: (Applicant t print all details)
More informationDEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Month
and a Drug-Free Wrkplace The Cunty f Mnterey Invites yur interest fr the psitin f DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Mnth OPEN UNTIL FILLED PRIORITY SCREENING DATE: Friday, Octber 13, 2017 Exam
More informationU.S. Federal Government
U.S. Federal Gvernment MS. IRAIDA R. MENDEZ-CARTAYA ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS, GRANTS ADMINISTRATION, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT U.S. Cnstitutin The supreme law f the natin
More informationItem No Halifax Regional Council August 14, 2012
Item N. 11.1.12 Halifax Reginal Cuncil August 14, 2012 TO: Mayr Kelly and Members f Halifax Reginal Cuncil SUBMITTED BY: Richard Butts, Chief Administrative Officer DATE: July 24, 2012 Original signed
More informationDual Court System Chapter 3
Dual Curt System Chapter 3 Dual Curt System In the United States the justice system has tw parts: 1. The Federal Curt System 2. The State Curt System Federal curts hear cases invlving federal matters
More informationArticle I: Legislative Branch; Powers of Congress, Powers denied Congress, how Congress functions
The Cnstitutin 1 Preamble, 7 Articles, 27 Amendments Articles f the Cnstitutin Preamble: The purpse f the Cnstitutin Article I: Legislative Branch; Pwers f Cngress, Pwers denied Cngress, hw Cngress functins
More informationBRIEFING NOTE. Both these cases involved appeals from judgments of Charles J in the Upper Tribunal, where the Court of Appeal considered:
Skiptn Huse Learning Disability Prgramme 6 th Flr 80 Lndn Rad Lndn SE1 6LH Publicatins Gateway Reference 07333 BRIEFING NOTE Abut this briefing nte At the end f March 2017, the Curt f Appeal handed dwn
More informationChild migration (subclass 101, 102, 445 and 117)
Child migratin (subclass 101, 102, 445 and 117) Applicatin Dcument Checklist (Thailand and Las) Hw d I ldge my applicatin? All applicatins shuld be ldged in persn at an Australian Visa Applicatin Centre
More informationIRISH CONGRESS OF TRADE UNIONS
IRISH CONGRESS OF TRADE UNIONS Observatins and Recmmendatins n the Applicatin f Transitinal Measures n the Accessin f Bulgaria and Rmania t the EU n 1 st January 2007 OCTOBER 2006 Overview Drafting an
More informationEngage MAT DBS Policy
Engage MAT DBS Plicy Date f ratificatin: Nvember 2017. Date f review: Nvember 2018..... Cntents 1. Intrductin... 3 2. Legal psitin... 4 3. Lcal authrity psitin... 6 4. The deplyment f staff... 7 5. Supply
More informationGENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 6.3.4 ISSUED: 5/6/09 SCOPE: All Swrn Persnnel EFFECTIVE: 5/6/09 DISTRIBUTION: General Orders Manual RESCINDS 34.1
More informationRole Play Magistrate Court Hearings Teacher information
Rle Play Magistrate Curt Hearings Teacher infrmatin These ntes are prvided s that teachers can guide students thrugh preparatry activities befre presenting a rle play at the Law Curts Cnnecting t the curriculum
More informationFOR RESTRICTED AOs DIPLOMA IN POLICING ASSESSMENT UNITS Banked
Title: Y/507/3619 Use plice pwers t deal with Level: 3 Credit Value: 10 GLH: 40 Learning Outcmes The learner will: 1. understand the requirements fr using plice pwers when dealing with Assessment Criteria
More informationOFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMMISSION ON ETHICS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AUGUST 3, 2017
OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMMISSION ON ETHICS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AUGUST 3, 2017 THURSDAY COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1:36 P.M. GOVERNMENTAL CENTER I. SWEARING IN NEW COMMISSIONER BY CHIEF
More informationCAUSE NO CITY OF FORT WORTH'S ORIGINAL ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant City of Fort Worth, Texas ("the City") and files this its
CAUSE NO. 48-270181-14 FORT WORTH PROFESSIONAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff V. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, Defendant 48 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMES NOW
More informationMASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ISAAC BORENSTEIN SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL
MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ISAAC BORENSTEIN SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL CHAPTER 1: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND MASSACHUSETTS LAW A. General Principles In rder fr the Furth Amendment
More informationSUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENT. Substituted Judgment--Overview
SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENT Substituted Judgment--Overview An exceptin t the general apprach t judicially-rdered alternative decisin making cncerns medical prcedures and treatment
More informationNova Scotia Nominee Program NSNP 200 Employer Information
Nva Sctia Nminee Prgram NSNP 200 Emplyer Infrmatin _ This frm must be cmpleted and signed by the emplyer supprting an NSNP 100 applicatin. It is nt an emplyment cntract, but verifies that an ffer f emplyment
More informationMARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW
MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS A. Frmatin f Cntracts 1. Mutual Assent Mutual assent: Offer
More informationROSE-HULMAN COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUITY
ROSE-HULMAN COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUITY USE AND ADAPTATION OF THIS MODEL WITH CITATION TO THE NCHERM GROUP/ATIXA IS PERMITTED THROUGH A LICENSE TO ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
More informationCommunity Protection Notices and Public Space Protection Orders. County Policing Command. Superintendent David Buckley
POLICY Cmmunity Prtectin Ntices and Public Space Prtectin Orders Plicy wners Plicy hlder Authr Cunty Plicing Cmmand Superintendent David Buckley Sgt Operatinal Partnership Team Plicy N. 208 Apprved by
More informationCriminal Procedure and Evidence. By Zohra Arbabzada
Criminal Prcedure and Evidence By Zhra Arbabzada 1 Cntents Testimnial, Dcumentary and Other Evidence... 3 Relevance and Adducing Evidence... 9 The Hearsay Rule... 11 The Opinin Rule... 15 Identificatin
More informationMASSACHUSETTS WILLS PROFESSOR KENT SCHENKEL NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW
MASSACHUSETTS WILLS PROFESSOR KENT SCHENKEL NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION A. Intrductin When yu encunter a wills and estates questin n the bar exam, yu first
More informationbriefing Case law to clarify the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards
briefing Case law t clarify the Deprivatin f Liberty Safeguards Intrductin...2 Case law in detail...4 DCC v KH and thers...4...4 Issue befre the curt...4 Outcme...4 W Primary Care Trust v TB...5...5 Issue
More information2018 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEW ALBANY CITY COUNCIL
2018 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEW ALBANY CITY COUNCIL APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: Residential Address: Cell Phne Number: Wrk Phne Number: E-Mail: CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS/PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationApplication for Authorisation
Applicatin fr Authrisatin Cnsumer Credit Sle trader appendix ntes Please take time t read these ntes carefully. They will help yu t fill in the Cnsumer Credit Sle Trader appendix frm crrectly. When cmpleting
More informationMARYLAND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PROFESSOR RUSSELL MCCLAIN UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW
MARYLAND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PROFESSOR RUSSELL MCCLAIN UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW Exam Tip 1: The Maryland Bar Exam tests n the Maryland Lawyers Rules f Prfessinal Cnduct, nt the ABA Mdel Rules.
More informationSocial Media and the First Amendment
Scial Media and the First Amendment Benjamin J. Yder Frst Brwn Tdd, LLC Margaret W. Cmey Lcke Lrd LLP Thurs. Feb. 1 & Fri. Feb. 2, 2018 Presentatin Overview Backgrund and develping case law Implementing
More information- Problems with e-filing, especially for people from lower-income backgrounds. - Receiving memos / communication from one side and not the other
State Curt Training Mediatin: Beynd the Basics Jhn Lande and Susan M. Yates Nvember 3, 2017 Linked frm Stne Sup: Takeaways Frm New Hampshire Mediatin Training Mediatins frm Hell - Prblems with e-filing,
More informationConference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption
United Natins CAC/COSP/IRG/I/4/1/Add.60 * Cnference f the States Parties t the United Natins Cnventin against Crruptin Distr.: General 28 July 2017 English Original: Spanish Implementatin Review Grup Resumed
More informationFebruary 6, Interview with WILLIAM J. BAROODY,.JR. William A. Syers Political Scientist and Deputy Director House Republican Policy Committee
B # f c% Interview with WILLIAM J. BARDY,.JR. by William A. Syers Plitical Scientist and Deputy Directr Huse Republican Plicy Cmmittee ~ c;" n February 6, 1985 i TRANSCRIPT F AN INTERVIEW WITH WILLIAM
More informationVideo Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched
Garden State CLE 21 Winthrp Rad Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 (609) 895-0046 fax- 609-895-1899 Atty2starz@al.cm Vide Curse Evaluatin Frm Attrney Name Atty ID number fr Pennsylvania: Name f Curse Yu Just
More informationImpact of Proffer Legislation Changes
Impact f Prffer Legislatin Changes General Infrmatin n New Statute VA Cde Sectin 5.2-2303.4 Senate Bill (SB) 549 206 Sessin Reprt Senate Bill (SB) 549 New Prffer Legislatin (Handut) Slide 9 & 0 frm Schl
More informationEstablishing the standard of care against which the D will be assessed;
Breach f Duty The task f determining whether a duty f care has been breached invlves a cmparisn f the defendant s cnduct with the standard f care required by the duty. Whenever the defendant s cnduct falls
More informationCAPIC Submission on Part 16: Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR)
2017 CAPIC Submissin n Part 16: Immigratin and Refugee Prtectin Regulatins (IRPR) CAPIC SUBMISSION-PART 16: IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION REGULATIONS (IRPR) Cntents Intrductin... 2 Preamble... 2 Opinin/Input
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN GENERAL COMMENTS This is the packet fr peple wh want t file their wn divrce in Cbb Cunty, and wh d nt have any minr children tgether
More information