Minutes of 03/13/01 HPC Meeting [adopted]

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Minutes of 03/13/01 HPC Meeting [adopted]"

Fay Angela Lyons
5 years ago
Views:

1 Minutes of 03/13/01 HPC Meeting [adopted] Becky E Smith on 03/26/2001 at 10:11 AM Category: HPC MINUTES MINUTES Wake County Historic Preservation Commission Tuesday, March 13, :30 p.m., Wake County Courthouse 316 Fayetteville Street Mall Raleigh, North Carolina Members Present (10): Ms. Ann Suggs (Chair), Mr. Tom Alexander (Vice-Chair), Ms. Sylvia Weaver, Ms. Camille Morrissey, Ms. Mary Rollins, Mr. Ed Morris, Ms. Phyllis Tuttle, Mr. Ed Davis, Mr. John Lane, Mr. William Mangum Members Not Present (2): Mr. Dan Turner, Ms. Nancy Moore Staff Present (2): Ms. Ellen Turco, Historic Preservation Planner; Ms. Becky Smith, Secretary to the Commission. 1. Call to Order: Ms. Suggs called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. 2. Approval of Agenda: Ms. Suggs asked if there were any additions or corrections to the agenda. There were none. Mr. Lane made a motion that the Commission approve the agenda as submitted by Staff. Seconded by Ms. Tuttle, the motion carried by a vote of Approval of the Minutes of the February 13, 2001 meeting. Ms. Suggs asked Commission members if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes. There were none. Ms. Tuttle made a motion that the minutes be approved as submitted. Seconded by Ms. Morrissey, the motion carried by a vote of Public Hearing to consider the following Certificate of Appropriateness CA-05-01, Henry Kamphoefner House, 3060 Granville Drive, Raleigh Applicant: Tikka Hicks, Clearscapes Owner: Dan and Virginia Petrocella Project: Addition Ms. Suggs invited anyone wishing to speak to come forward, sign the roster and take the oath of affirmation. Mr. Robert Burns, FAIA Emeritus, representative of the property owner, and Ms. Ellen Turco, Historic Preservation Planner, took the oath of affirmation administered by Ms. Rebecca E. Smith, Notary Public of the State of North Carolina. Ms. Turco presented a slide presentation and a brief history of the original Kamphoefner House and plans for the addition and renovation. She stated that the house was completed in 1950 and was thought to be the first modern houses in Raleigh. Designed by Henry L. Kamphoefner, the founding dean of the N.C. State School of Design, it is a rigorous, elegant work of domestic architecture which incorporates such innovations as "Thermapane" windows, radiant heating,, and a unique natural ventilating system. These special design features, in addition to its low-slung lines and natural materials, reveal its profound debt to the house-type created in the 1930s by Frank Lloyd Wright and named by the great master

2 "Usonian", which signified to him a creation uniquely American in character. Ms. Turco stated that the original structure construction comprises 1630 square feet of conditioned space plus 350 square feet of carport and storage space. The proposal is to add 540 square feet of new conditioned space for a master bedroom suite and renovations to the existing carport for an enlarged kitchen and breakfast area. A new carport of approximately 400 square feet is also included in the plan. Other than the kitchen and carport renovation, the original house will be untouched and the interior of the house will remain the same. Materials, dimensions and details are intended to harmonize with those of the earlier design. Mr. Lane inquired about the square footage of addition and/or renovation on the east side of the house. Ms. Turco stated that there will be approximately 811 square feet of living space and 439 square feet for the carport. Ms. Turco stated that based on the information submitted and conversations with the architect, staff recommends the Commission approve the application as submitted. The staff findings are as follows: A. Design guideline 1 does not apply. B. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline The addition does not detract from the overall landmark setting or require the loss of significant site features. Integration into the wooded lot is an essential element of Kamphoefner's design. Important site features identified in the National Register nomination include wooded and sloping site, outdoor brick planter boxes along the foundation and views of the golf course. The open views of the golf course remain, as does the wooded character of the lot. C. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline Design guideline 3 stated that additions should be introduced on non-character defining elevations. As is typical of the Usonian style of architecture, the Kamphoefner House does not have a prominent front entry as is found in architecture based on classical styles. Therefore it is difficult to identify a primary elevation. All of the elevations can be described as character-defining. However, the national Register nomination identifies the southwest elevation (facing the golf course) as the "main elevation." The addition is visible from the main elevation but does not obscure or alter the original portions of it. D. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline The new addition is compatible with the landmark in massing, height, form, scale, proportion and roof shape. E. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline Window and door openings are compatible with those of the landmark in placement, proportion, orientation, scale and size. The Usonian theme of "prospect and refuge" is continued with large glass doors opening to the golf course. F. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline Exterior finishes such as brick, wood siding, roofing and windows to be compatible with existing. G. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline The addition is compatible with, yet differentiated from, the landmark. At the request of Preservation North Carolina, that holds covenants on the house, the architect designed the addition so that the roofline is slightly differentiated from the original house.

3 H. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline The addition minimizes the loss of historic fabric. Except for the interior renovation of the kitchen and the enclosure of the carport, both the interior and exterior of the original building remains untouched. I. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline The size and scale of the new addition does not visually overpower the landmark. The original house is 1630 square feet. The addition adds master bed/bath suite consisting of 811 square feet, and replaces the enclosed carport with a new carport that is 439 square feet. 2. The size and scale of the new addition does not significantly alter the proportion of built to unbuilt area of the site. The new addition consists of approximately 1300 square feet on a.43-acre site. J. The proposed addition is not incongruous with design guideline Significant site features such as mature trees will be retained as an integral part of the site. Seven trees will be removed to construct a new concrete sidewalk and retaining wall. Approximately 40 trees will remain on the site. Mr. Burns stated that he had nothing to add to the staff presentation of the application and was available to answer any questions from the Commission. Mr. Lane inquired about the feasibility and possible future enclosure of the carport. Mr. Burns stated that Preservation North Carolina holds protective convenants on the house and would address that issue if plans are submitted for the enclosure. Ms. Suggs asked if there were any other questions or comments. With no other questions or comments, Ms. Suggs closed the public hearing and invited Commission members for discussion, findings of fact, and recommendation. Mr. Alexander made a motion that based on the information presented, that the Commission find as a fact staff findings A through J in its entirety. Seconded by Mr. Lane, the motion carried by a vote of Mr. Alexander made a motion that based on the preceding findings of fact, that the Commission grant a certificate of appropriateness for the applicant, Tikka Hicks with Clearscapes; landmark, Henry L. Kamphoefner House; location, 3060 Granville Drive; jurisdiction, Raleigh. Seconded by Mr. Lane, the motion carried by a vote of Ms. Suggs stated that Mr. Burns would receive documentation for approval of the certificate of appropriateness in approximately 10 days. 5. CAP update: Mr. Gary Roth, President and CEO, Capital Area Preservation, Inc. (CAP), presented an update on the organization's activities. He stated that over the last several weeks, the Board of Directors of CAP has been engaged in discussion with the City or Raleigh with the goal of establishing a new relationship for the operation of Mordecai Historic Park (MHP). He stated that the purpose of his address to the Commission was to make Commission members aware of the nature of these discussions, and of CAP's position regarding its future relationship with MHP. Mr. Roth stated that the City of Raleigh and CAP are currently in negotiation with regard to the terms of its current lease. Under the current lease, CAP serves as the management company and receives an annual allotment from the City of Raleigh, but the amount is insufficient to cover the operating expenses of MHP. As a result, CAP funds MHP's substantial operating deficits with funds generated by CAP's non-mhp-related activities.

4 CAP also displays its collection of historic artifacts without remuneration from the City of Raleigh. He stated that CAP's vision for MHP is that of an historic site and museum respectful of its cultural resources,vigorous in its collection care, aggressive in its marketing, outstanding in its public programs, dynamic in its daily interpretation, and positioned for consistent improvement, self-sustaining growth, and long-term public value for the citizens of and the visitors to the City of Raleigh. In order for CAP to achieve its vision, CAP proposed a five-year plan to the City of Raleigh, at the end of which MHP will be accredited by the American Association of Museums (AAM). Mr. Roth urged Commission members to support CAP's proposed five-year plan. He stated that CAP will keep the Commission members informed as to its progress on the proposed five-year plan. 6. Chairman's Report a. Ms. Suggs asked Mr. David Cooke, Wake County Manager, to speak to the Commission. Mr. Cooke invited Commission members to ask questions. Mr. Cooke stated that the historic preservation service analysis has been completed. At this point in time, he has no conclusions or preconceptions with regards to the role of the Historic Preservation Commission. The purpose of the service analysis is to pose the different questions relative to historic preservation such as where is the historic preservation program today, what are the goals and objectives for the future, and then laying out what the different issues and alternatives are for exploring the question of where the historic preservation program is today. After much discussion with Commission members regarding the changes within the Planning Department, Mr. Cooke stated that the current changes in personnel are not programmatically related. Mr. Cooke invited all Commission members to call or come by his office with any questions, concerns, or advice relative to historic preservation. Mr. Cooke stated that the County is currently developing its annual budget. With the reduction in funds from the State of North Carolina, the County is looking at ways to maintain its current level of service with reduced funding. 7. Committee Reports: a. Designation Committee Mr. Davis, Chair, stated that the Maynard-Pearson House Landmark Designation in Apex be forwarded to the Commission at its April meeting. The N.C. Department of Transportation has agreed to pay 80% of the cost for signage for the Green Level Historic District and a graphics artist to design the prototype for all of the signs for the rural historic districts. Draft letters have been mailed to Capital Area Preservation, Inc., Preservation North Carolina, and Raleigh Historic Districts Commission, with regard to the Governor's Mansion paint scheme request. The Raleigh Historic Districts Commission will meet during the month of March to discuss the issue. Ms. Turco was asked to report on the comments and/or decision of the Raleigh Historic Districts Commission. A handout was distributed concerning the Rogers Cemetery. Mr. Alexander contacted the heir of the Rogers Cemetery. She has agreed to the Wake County Historic Preservation Commission's pursuit for preservation of the cemetery. Ms. Turco updated Commission members on the status of the Green Level Interchange. She stated that the location will remain the same. b. Public Relations/Education Committee

5 Ms. Rollins, Chair, stated that the committee is pursuing the possibility of obtaining a portable exhibit display. Mr. Al Brothers, Al Brothers Associates, met with the committee to present an estimate of the design and cost. The brochure is ready to go to print. The Commission members were asked to review the brochure and make comments. Ms. Rollins presented an overview of the brochure folder and its contents. There is no progress on the TV spot to date. The committee is exploring other means of obtaining a TV spot. The Wake County Historic Architecture book has been distributed to area public school media centers. A label was placed in the front of each book stating that the book was donated by the Wake County Historic Preservation Commission and the Wake County Board of Commissioners. The CAP donation agreement with regards to the Wake County Historic Preservation Architecture book has not been finalized to date. Also, during the month of May there is Historic Preservation Week. The Wake County Historic Preservation Commission is working on a partnership with Historic Oakview to present plaques to new designation property owners. Mr. Davis inquired about the publishing and/or printing date of the brochure folder and whether the Commission wants to have images of Raleigh historic properties on the folder as opposed to rural historic properties. After Commission discussion, by unanimous consent the brochure folder will be revisited to determine if the pictures need to be changed. c. Enforcement Committee Mr. Alexander, Chair, stated that there has not been a formal meeting of the committee to date. He stated that with Ms. Rollins' assistance, all of the ordinances and general statutes have been collected relative to enforcement. Mr. Alexander stated that the Attorney for the City of Raleigh and the Attorney for Wake County were to meet to discuss the enforcement issue. He will be informed as to the outcome of the meeting. Ms. Rollins stated that Ms. Maggie O'Connor, Director of Historic Restoration Commission with Buncombe County, has spoken to historic preservation commissions across the state about enforcement. Ms. Rollins asked Commission members to consider having her come and speak. 9. Staff Report: Ms. Turco presented an overview of each minor works: CA-02-01, Rogers-Bagley-Daniels- Pegues House, exterior renovation; CA-03-01, Leslie-Alford Mims House, relocate wash house, and CA-04-01, Pine State Creamery, awning for Hard Times Cafe. Ms. Turco stated that the Historic Preservation Service Analysis has been completed and forwarded to the Budget Office. 10. Other Business Mr. Michael D. Jennings, Planning Director, addressed the Commission stating that he will continue to be with Wake County and will assist, as he can, with the historic preservation program. He stated that the Planning Department is currently in negotiation with Ms. Turco for consulting services. Routine calls and requests will be coordinated by the Secretary to the Commission. Mr. Lane made a motion that the Commission write a letter of appreciation to both Mr. Jennings and Ms. Turco under the signature of the Chair. Seconded by Ms. Tuttle, the motion carried by a vote of 10-0.

6 Ms. Turco reminded committee chairs that minutes need to be recorded and forwarded to the Secretary to the Commission for inclusion in monthly meeting packets. Commission members discussed the procedure for subsequent meetings with regard to agendas and packet content. 11. Retreat follow-up: Mr. Lane requested that item #2 on the last page of the Retreat Follow-up be amended to read "The Committee shall continue to pursue the Designation Committee's Priorities List." and an additional bullet be added to state that "The committee work with the Public Relations/Education committee to develop and pursue the 10 most endangered properties in the County." Mr. Turner requested, at the Designation Committee meeting, that the Commission review the job description for the upcoming staff vacancy. 12. Adjourn Ms. Suggs asked if there was any other business to come before the Commission. With no other business to come before the Commission, Ms. Suggs declared the meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: Becky Smith Secretary to the Commission 03/26/01

MEETING SUMMARY WAKE COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 13, Wake County Courthouse, Room 700

April 1999 Collin Ingraham on 04/30/1999 at 10:56 AM Category: HPC MINUTES MEETING SUMMARY WAKE COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 13, 1999 - Wake County Courthouse, Room 700 MEMBERS PRESENT: