the way prisoners were accounted for in legislative districts. Instead of being counted at their
|
|
- Cody Moody
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No Representation without Population : Maryland s Attempt to Fix Prison- Based Gerrymandering Introduction In 2010, Maryland passed the No Representation Without Population Act, which changed the way prisoners were accounted for in legislative districts. Instead of being counted at their prisons, they will now be counted as living at their last-known home address. The motivation for this was nominally to fix the prison-based gerrymandering present by miscounting a portion of Maryland s population, along with curtailing all of the problems in representation and democracy that accompanied these practices. However, Maryland failed to follow these changes with nonpartisan redistricting and ended up with a partisan gerrymander that technically fixed the prisonbased gerrymandering, but appeared to leave all of the problems and side effects. In order to fix prison-based gerrymandering for good, Maryland should continue its new plan of redistributing prisoners but should then develop a non-partisan redistricting plan to work towards a fair electoral map that allows equal representation and democracy for everyone. Prison-Based Gerrymandering and its Effect on Representation Across the country, political districts are drawn using the results of the US Census, which happens every ten years. The Census Bureau apportions representatives per state based on changes in state population, but the drawing of individual districts is left up to state and local governments. 1 But one major flaw in this method of redistricting is the way prisoners are accounted for. In the US Census, prisoners are counted as living in the prison that they are currently incarcerated in. When states then draw legislative districts based on these census results, they include prisoners in the 1 U.S. Census Bureau. Apportionment Population and Number of Representatives, U.S. Department of Commerce Found at 1
2 districts that their prisons are in. Even though they are forced to live there and are not members of the greater community, they are still counted as living in that district and included in population totals. The method of counting prisoners in their prison districts becomes even more problematic when considered along with the fact that prisoners are not eligible to vote. In Maryland, convicted felons are only eligible to vote once they have served their full incarceration sentence and completed any parole or probation once they are released. 2 Assuming they complete these things, they can regain the right to vote again. But while they are in prison, even though they are disenfranchised, they are still included in the population totals for the district. Essentially, prisons can be used as population buffers. Because their residents cannot vote but they are still counted as residents of the district, the votes of everyone else in the district become more heavily weighted. This method of districting prisoners in their prisons has come to be known as prison-based gerrymandering, as it arguably gerrymanders districts in an unfair way by strategically incorporating prisons (large blocks of citizens who cannot vote) into certain districts. Prison-based gerrymandering creates two major problems that could affect representation: malapportionment and overrepresentation of certain groups. Both of these could lead to non-majoritarian policy outcomes and could impede democracy in Maryland. Malapportionment, or creating electoral districts with unequal ratios of constituents to elected officials, was a major problem in the United States in the 1960s. Districts were commonly not redrawn after population shifts, which meant that fast-growing urban areas had significantly more constituents in them than surrounding rural areas, even though they had the same 2 Maryland State Senate. Voter Registration Protection Act. Senate Bill 488. March 22, Found at 2
3 representation. 3 The issue was brought to the Supreme Court in the 1960s in Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims. The Supreme Court ruled that malapportionment was unconstitutional, and states were mandated to draw districts for the US House of Representatives and state legislatures that contained equal (or approximately equal) populations. States then began drawing new legislative districts decennially after each Census, in order to account for population shifts. This nominally made districts equal, as they were being updated for population changes and were mandated to hold approximately equal populations in compliance with the one person, one vote principle, which holds that all constituents votes should be approximately equal in a democracy. This method of districting prisoners in their prisons arguably does not violate the one person, one vote principle, as prisoners have lost the right to vote after being convicted, do legally reside in their prisons, and need to still be counted somehow for population purposes in the Census. At first glance, it seems like the counting of prisoners could be similar to the counting of children: children also cannot vote, but are still counted in the Census and included in population totals for legislative districting purposes. Likewise, the counting of prisoners also resembles the way the census counts college students, as both are counted as living at their institutions and families are explicitly told not to include them as family members. 4 But counting prisoners in political districts where their prisons are creates malapportionment problems that are not present when children are counted as living in their family homes. Prisoners do not belong to the communities where their prisons are. When prisoners are released from prisons, they will likely return to the communities they came from, instead of staying around their prison. This is not the case when children are counted as living with their families or when college students 3 Gary Cox and Jonathan Katz. Elbridge Gerry s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press Nancy Scola. Making Prisoners Count. The American Prospect. October 22, Found at 3
4 are counted as living at their colleges. Children grow up as part of the community and feel connected to it, even though they are too young to vote. Likewise, while college students may not get heavily invested in local politics, they tend to engage and interact with the community they reside in while at school. 5 In other words, both children and college students have other ways to have their voice heard and feel like they are a part of the community. Prisoners do not. By forcing them into a political district with a rural community they have no ties to and cannot participate in, they functionally become a phantom population. Elected officials have no reason to represent the interest of the prisoner group, since they have no attachment to the district, cannot vote, will most likely not be around for future elections, and most likely will not ever willingly reside in the district, unlike the rest of the constituency. The non-incarcerated remainder of the constituency is the only section that is listened to and also the only section that can vote; this remainder of the constituency thus holds the same amount of power as the entirety of constituencies without prisons, which is the essence of malapportionment. One of the most extreme examples of this is from a ward in eastern Iowa, where out of the 1,400 constituents, 1,300 are in prison and only 58 are non-prisoners. 6 The three other city wards have relatively equal populations around 1,400, but none of them contains a prison. Effectively, this means that the 58 non-prison residents each have thirty times as much political power as residents in the other three wards. When being interviewed by the New York Times, the city councilor from the previously mentioned eastern Iowa district that was primarily prisoners remarked, Do I 5 Ibid. 6 Sam Roberts. Census Bureau s Counting of Prisoners Benefits Some Rural Voting Districts. The New York Times. October 23, Found at 4
5 consider [the prisoners] my constituents? They don t vote, so, I guess, not really. 7, highlighting the problem quite nicely. This malapportionment could lead to non-majoritarian outcomes, particularly in Maryland when the demographics of the involved populations are considered. Prisons tend to be in rural areas but prisoners are overwhelmingly from urban areas. 8 The 2010 Census found that, of Maryland s nearly 17,000 prisoners, 7,797 of them were from Baltimore City alone (out of a total population of 626,664 for the city). On the other hand, Western Maryland (comprised of Allegany, Garrett, and Washington Counties) had a total population of 252,614 and housed prisons that held 8,030 prisoners, even though only 665 prisoners in the state of Maryland came from those counties. By counting prisoners as residing in their prisons for purposes of Maryland districting, Maryland s urban population is systematically undercounted and its rural population is systematically overcounted. This systematic undercounting of urban centers and overcounting of rural populations is strikingly similar to the malapportionment problems present before one person, one vote, and we could expect to see similar problems with representation here. 9 Biasing the representation in favor of rural constituents could lead to non-majoritarian policy outcomes driven by these rural constituents. For instance, a rural constituency the size of one district could turn into two rural districts padded with disenfranchised urban prisoners. This could result in the rural constituency being able to elect two representatives who would argue for their interests, instead of the one they fairly deserve. In even more extreme cases, like the Iowa constituency mentioned above, there are 7 Ibid. 8 Maryland Department of Planning Adjusted Census Population for Maryland by County and Region Found at 9 Gary Cox and Jonathan Katz. Elbridge Gerry s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. 5
6 clear non-majoritarian decisions being made when less than 5% of the population are the only ones who can vote and are the only ones who are represented. Prison-based gerrymandering in Maryland also seems like it could lead to unequal representation of certain groups (namely differentiated by class and race), which could lead to nonmajoritarian outcomes. Bartels and Gilens both discuss the prevalence of legislators favoring higher-income constituents over lower-income ones Notably, they did find that the preferences between higher and lower income constituents did not differ considerably on many issues, but that representatives were considerably more likely to listen to their richer constituents when the opinions between classes differed. Even after for controlling for participation, voter turnout, and other methods of political activism, lower class constituents were still less likely to be listened to. Brunner, Ross, and Washington argue that the effects found by Bartels and Gillens are less extreme than they argue, as Brunner et al found that representatives responsiveness to their constituents when classes clashed depended on party: they found that Democrats were more likely to follow the views of lower class constituents, and Republicans were more likely to follow the views of upper class constituents. 12 All three articles discuss the potential negative impact that such findings could have on democracy. If certain class groups are responded to and represented more than others, a social and political hierarchy is created. Policies are more likely to be enacted to meet these groups interests and thus ignore lower-class interests. 10 Larry Bartels. Economic Inequality and Political Representation Martin Gilens. The Preference/Policy Link. Affluence and Influence. Princeton University Press. July 22, Eric Brunner, Stephen Ross, Ebonya Washington. Does Less Income Mean Less Representation?
7 Prison-based gerrymandering could exacerbate both of these inequalities. Maryland s prison population is overwhelmingly black and poor. Statewide, Maryland s population is around 28% black. But on average, 76% of the prison population is black. 13 These numbers match with the demographics of the areas where prisoners are most likely to be from (e.g., the population of Baltimore City is 63.6% black) and where prisons commonly are (e.g., the population of Washington County is only 10% black). 14 Likewise, these prisoners are overwhelmingly likely to be from lower social classes, many of who are living below the poverty line and are homeless and unemployed. 15 By counting prisoners, who are predominantly black and poor, as members of the predominately middle or upper class white communities where prisons are located, the electoral process becomes biased against these lower-class black communities. This can only add to the discrimination and lack of responsiveness they already encounter. The original articles do not discuss race, but it seems likely, given the correlation between race and social class, that black communities in Maryland are also underrepresented. By undercounting lower-class black communities due to prisoners living in prisons in other districts, Maryland has taken a political group that would already be underrepresented and underresponded to and counted them as being smaller than they are. The problems presented by counting prisoners as being residents of their prisons for districting purposes can be summarized as presenting an unfair and inaccurate view of populations. 13 Vincent Schiraldi and Jason Ziedenberg. Race and Incarceration in Maryland. Justice Policy Institute. October 23, Found at 14 U.S. Census Bureau. Maryland. U.S. Department of Commerce Found at 15 Vincent Schiraldi and Jason Ziedenberg. Race and Incarceration in Maryland. Justice Policy Institute. October 23, Found at 7
8 Because prisoners cannot vote, counting them as living in their prisons can create phantom populations that can simply be used to pad districts, causing some the votes of some to be worth more than the votes of others. Given the skewed demographics of prisoners in Maryland, this, in turn, means that some communities and populations can hold more political power than others. Prison-based gerrymandering thus seems to cause one old problem (malapportionment) that has already been considered to be undemocratic enough that the Supreme Court had to rule on it, and exacerbate another problem (unequal representation of populations) that has been shown to be present and problematic to democracy. Maryland s Attempted Solution Maryland s proposed solution to prison-based gerrymandering came in the form of the No Representation Without Population Act of The act required that incarcerated prisoners be counted as living at their last-known home address instead of living at the prison, for the purpose of congressional, legislative, and local districting. The federal prison in Cumberland, Maryland and its 1400 inmates are excluded from the redistricting plans and will continue to be counted as residents of the prison, as federal prisons do not release last-known addresses. 16 Logistically, the act requires a decent amount of work from Maryland. The Maryland Department of Corrections must work with the Department of Planning to verify the last-known addresses of prisoners and add them into the correct districts. Any prisoners who were homeless or who had unknown last addresses would be counted as living at the prisons. Any prisoners who previously lived outside of Maryland immediately before they were incarcerated are not counted in any districts. 16 Maryland Department of Redistricting. No Representation Without Population Act. Maryland Department of Planning Found at 8
9 Following the 2010 Census, 18,309 prisoners were shifted based on previous home addresses. 16,988 of them were moved between districts and 1,321 were removed. The full table, provided by the US Census Bureau, is attached as Appendix 1. As one would expect, urban areas tended to gain population. Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and Prince George s County each gained a net increase of over a thousand prisoners. Areas on the Eastern Shore where there are no prisons also gained net prisoners (as it was impossible for them to lose any), but no county s population gained more than 200 prisoners, presumably due to their low starting populations. On the other hand, rural counties such as Somerset County, Washington County, and Allegany County lost significant numbers of prisoners. In particular, Somerset County lost 10.3% of its population, due to a nearly 3,000-person prison whose inmates were redistributed. Maryland redistricted following the results of the 2010 Census and the redistribution of prisoners to their last-known home addresses. On October 3, 2011, the Governor s Redistricting Advisory Committee released its recommendations for redistricting. 17 The plan was met with criticism from Maryland Republicans, who claimed the Democrat-led committee had intentionally gerrymandered the districts in favor of Democrats. But the bill passed through the state legislature and was signed into law by Governor O Malley on October 19, By March 5, opponents to the new redistricting plan had obtained enough signatures to add the approval of the plan as a ballot initiative in the 2012 elections, believing that Maryland voters may vote against the redistricting plan. But the ballot initiative passed with 61% of the vote, effectively ending debate on the new districts Maryland Department of Redistricting. Congressional and Legislative Districts. Maryland Department of Planning Found at General Election Results. Maryland State Board of Elections Found at 9
10 Recommended Solution: Non-Partisan Redistricting with Redistributed Prisoners In order to fix these institutional problems, Maryland should adopt non-partisan redistricting in addition to having prisoners counted as living at their last-known home addresses. Counting prisoners at their real address should give a more accurate picture of Maryland s population and its distribution throughout the state. When districts are drawn according to these populations, districts should be fairer and more accurately represent the real constituencies. But non-partisan redistricting should be adopted because it will prevent other types of gerrymandering, ensuring that districts remain as compact and cohesive as possible. Without non-partisan gerrymandering, Maryland could potentially ignore the larger problem by redistributing prisoners and then drawing districts in a way that still favor the same communities. This would have technically solved the problem of prisonbased gerrymandering, but would not have solved the larger problems in representation and democracy. Maryland s proposed solution, in fact, comes close to doing exactly this, as is discussed in the next section. Evaluating the effectiveness of redistributing prisoners is hard to do, because Maryland was the first state to adopt such a plan and has only had one election cycle (2012) with the new districting. New York, Delaware, and California have since passed similar laws, but not enough data is available to be able to see any changes (or lack thereof) in voting, policy, representation, or responsiveness. Results of the prison redistribution indicate that the population shift was not particularly large in both Maryland and New York. 19 The redrawn New York districting plans showed a slight increase in population in urban areas and a decrease in rural areas, but the districts themselves did not change shape or size in a meaningful way. Although Maryland s districts did 19 Maggie Clark. Could a Recount of Prisoners Affect Elections?. Stateline: The Pew Charitable Trusts. October 12, Found at 10
11 change, it seems like the change was due more to partisan redistricting and less population shift from prisoners, since the number of prisoners shifted was so low. 20 From looking at the shifted numbers, it seems that redistributing prisoners did succeed in giving more accurate population totals. Both New York and Maryland showed increases in urban centers and decreases in rural areas, as is expected. The magnitude of the change is also somewhat expected, as prisoners are only around 1% of the population, and thus should not significantly impact districts. Jason P. Kelly s article, The Strategic Use of Prisons in Partisan Gerrymandering, provides one of the few quantitative views of prison-based gerrymandering and its effects. He looked at the changes in districts containing and around prisons over time and found that the prison-based gerrymandering was incorporated into most plans: On average, we can expect a party that has recently taken control of the redistricting process to draw more than 5,000 prisoners from districts controlled by the other party or marginal districts into their safest districts. Further, as shown with the Texas and Florida cases, states that aggressively pursue such a strategy will shift tens of thousands of inmates into the districts that they are the least likely to lose over the following 10 years. 21 He found that both Democratic and Republican legislators were likely to draw plans that incorporated these large blocs of non-voters into districts that they would win. This strategy creates safe districts for their party, but uses the minimal number of their voters, allowing them to redistribute others into more competitive districts to give them a greater advantage there. Importantly, he found that the change in prison populations among districts was only statistically significant after the party in control of districting switched. These results indicate that legislators only move prison populations around when it helps their party (presumably, if there is no change in 20 Maryland Department of Planning Adjusted Census Population for Maryland by County and Region Found at 21 Jason P. Kelly. The Strategic Use of Prisons in Partisan Gerrymandering. Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol 37, Issue 1. February Found at 11
12 power, the same party continues to control redistricting and has already shifted prison populations to their advantage). These results highlight the need for non-partisan redistricting to fully fix the problems surrounding prisons. Even if prisoners are properly redistributed, it seems likely that partisan redistricting could still take advantage of the high number of disenfranchised prisoners in urban areas and create similarly gerrymandered districts that take advantage of this non-voting bloc. The empirical evidence on non-partisan redistricting, however, is somewhat mixed. Michael McDonald argues in favor of them, saying that, while non-partisan redistricting is not perfect, appointing an independent committee to develop redistricting plans is one of the key factors in an ideal redistricting process. 22 He argues that states with partisan committees (or committees whose members are appointed on a partisan basis) are prone to creating gerrymandered maps, and that commissioners should be removed from politics as much as possible. They should be focused on drawing districts that conform to objective criteria (such as compactness and cohesiveness) and they should be accountable to the public, not to partisan legislators. The main problem with non-partisan redistricting seems to be that it is hard to make it truly non-partisan. It is nearly impossible to create districts that are compact, meaningful, cohesive, competitive, and allow for minority views to be heard; many of these factors are frequently at odds. Thus, some factors have to be chosen over others, which inevitably causes districting plans to favor one party over the other. 23 The article details how Iowa s non-partisan committee is often lauded as a success, but argues that this is more likely due to Iowa s successful districting comes from its naturally competitive and mostly even geography. It seems that outcome-based regulations, where 22 Michael P. McDonald. Legislative Redistricting. Democracy in the States. Brookings Institution Press. June 1, Michael P. McDonald. Regulating Redistricting. PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Oct., 2007), pp Found at 12
13 the political outcomes (whether it be competitive districts or minority-majority districts) are decided beforehand and the redistricting board must then meet these goals. This may give less room for gerrymandering regardless of the commission s composition, as they have a set of goals that need to be achieved. Redistributing prisoners and non-partisan redistricting may not be a panacea for the problems in representation surrounding the districting of prisons, but both seem to be at least somewhat effective and would certainly be better than Maryland s current solution. Effectiveness of Changes in Maryland Maryland redistributed prisoners and redistricted based on those results in As described previously, the prison redistribution appears to have been successful. Population was added to the major urban centers in Maryland and was subtracted from rural areas. The problem of padding rural populations with non-voting blocs of prisoners seems to have disappeared, as the two populations have been separated before districting occurs. However, the redistricting that followed was partisan and heavily driven by Maryland Democrats. Unsurprisingly, this resulted in a heavily gerrymandered map. A geospatial analysis firm calculated the average compactness of each state s districts, and Maryland ranked last. 24 Much of this can be attributed Maryland s pinwheel-shaped third district, which contains separated parts of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Howard, and Montgomery Counties. The district weaves together wealthy voters from DC suburbs with poor Baltimore residents, creating a constituency that 24 The Washington Post Editorial Board. Vote Against Maryland Redistricting. The Washington Post. October 19, Found at 13
14 manages to lean Democratic while have few demographics or interests in common. 25 The 2010 redistricting also split Maryland s 6 th district, which had consisted of the rural, western counties that were historically Republican, in half. Half of it remained in the 6 th district and absorbed a heavily Democratic chunk of Montgomery County, while the other half was given to the 8 th district, whose remaining constituents were also heavily Democratic. Unsurprisingly, this resulted in Democratic victories in both the 6 th and 8 th districts, netting the Democrats another member in the House of Representatives. 26 So while the redistricting did technically take prison readjustments into consideration, it failed to fix the representation problems. Most of the districts continue to consist of politically favorable constituencies, instead of meaningful communities or even compact geographic areas. Paired with the earlier discussion on unequal representation, it seems likely that the underrepresented constituencies are still underrepresented. In some districts, like the sprawling 3 rd district, inner-city areas that likely contain large amounts of prisoners are still grouped with rural areas, indicating that perhaps the representation problem has not been solved at all. Non-partisan redistricting has the potential to at least partially fix these problems. Given that Maryland is considered to be the most gerrymandered state at the moment, it seems unlikely that a non-partisan committee could do anything besides help. An outcome-based redistricting plan has potential. If they started with the idea of what districts should look like and what political outcomes should be, perhaps the districts would be more meaningful. If one of the goals were a compact minority-majority district, Baltimore City would probably be mostly contained in such a district. 25 Jeff Guo. Welcome to America s Most Gerrymandered District. The New Republic. November 8, Found at 26 Gerrymandered? Maryland voters to Decide. The Washington Post. Updated September 27, Accessed at 14
15 Much of Maryland s disenfranchised prison population would be included in this district, but their real community would be, as well. They would be able to participate once they finished serving their sentence, so representatives would have a bigger incentive to listen to and respond to them. Likewise, their community would be heavily represented for the size that it truly is, which would hopefully lend to an appropriately sized amount of political power. Without this non-partisan redistricting, Maryland s redistribution of prisoners seems somewhat futile. Perhaps they stopped prison-based gerrymandering in practice, but the same communities seem like they would still be underrepresented and ignored, and gerrymandering clearly still exists. Thus, the fundamental democratic problems found in prison-based gerrymandering continue to exist and seem like they will until a non-partisan redistricting effort is implemented in Maryland. Recommendations/Conclusions Maryland should adopt a non-partisan redistricting plan in conjunction with its policy of redistributing prisoners to their homes. Prison-based gerrymandering is certainly a problem that exists in Maryland, and it does seem likely to have a negative impact on democracy. But simply redistributing prisoners and continuing to redistrict on a partisan basis cannot solve these problems. The same underrepresented communities will continue to be ignored, and the overrepresented communities will continue to hold more political power than they should. Non-partisan redistricting may not produce a perfect electoral map, but it will certainly be an improvement to the current one and help to fix the problems of representation found in Maryland today. 15
16 Works Cited Bartels, Larry. Economic Inequality and Political Representation Brunner, Eric, Stephen Ross, Ebonya Washington. Does Less Income Mean Less Representation? Clark, Maggie. Could a Recount of Prisoners Affect Elections?. Stateline: The Pew Charitable Trusts. October 12, Found at Cox, Gary and Jonathan Katz. Elbridge Gerry s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press Gilens, Martin. The Preference/Policy Link. Affluence and Influence. Princeton University Press. July 22, Guo, Jeff. Welcome to America s Most Gerrymandered District. The New Republic. November 8, Found at Kelly, Jason P. The Strategic Use of Prisons in Partisan Gerrymandering. Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol 37, Issue 1. February Found at Maryland Department of Planning Adjusted Census Population for Maryland by County and Region Found at Maryland Department of Redistricting. Congressional and Legislative Districts. Maryland Department of Planning Found at Maryland Department of Redistricting. No Representation Without Population Act. Maryland Department of Planning Found at Maryland State Board of Elections General Election Results Found at Maryland State Senate. Voter Registration Protection Act. Senate Bill 488. March 22, Found at McDonald, Michael P. Legislative Redistricting. Democracy in the States. Brookings Institution Press. June 1,
17 McDonald, Michael P. Regulating Redistricting. PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Oct., 2007), pp Found at Roberts, Sam. Census Bureau s Counting of Prisoners Benefits Some Rural Voting Districts. The New York Times. October 23, Found at Schiraldi, Vincent and Jason Ziedenberg. Race and Incarceration in Maryland. Justice Policy Institute. October 23, Found at Scola, Nancy. Making Prisoners Count. The American Prospect. October 22, Found at U.S. Census Bureau. Apportionment Population and Number of Representatives, U.S. Department of Commerce Found at U.S. Census Bureau. Maryland. U.S. Department of Commerce Found at The Washington Post. Gerrymandered? Maryland voters to Decide. Updated September 27, Accessed at The Washington Post Editorial Board. Vote Against Maryland Redistricting. The Washington Post. October 19, Found at 17
18 Appendix 1: Census Bureau Chart 18
All People are Equal, but Some People are More Equal Than Others
2017 All People are Equal, but Some People are More Equal Than Others HOW PRISON GERRYMANDERING CREATES PHANTOM CONSTITUENTS AND REMOVES POWER FROM COMMUNITIES ANTOINE MARSHALL I. Introduction North Carolina
More informationTX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING
TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING https://www.texastribune.org/2018/04/23/texas-redistricting-fight-returns-us-supreme-court/ TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING https://www.texastribune.org/2018/04/23/texas-redistricting-fight-returns-us-supreme-court/
More informationShould Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund
Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? 1 Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and keep themselves and their party in power. 2 3 -The U.S. Constitution requires that the
More informationRedistricting in Michigan
Dr. Martha Sloan of the Copper Country League of Women Voters Redistricting in Michigan Should Politicians Choose their Voters? Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY NEIL C. PARROTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN MCDONOUGH, et al., Defendants. * * * * * * No. 02-C-12-172298 * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
More informationThe Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West
The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West David F. Damore Associate Professor of Political Science University of Nevada, Las Vegas Nonresident Senior Fellow Brookings
More informationWHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM
WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM REDRAWING PENNSYLVANIA S CONGRESSIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS Every 10 years, after the decennial census, states redraw the boundaries of their congressional
More information2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA
Southern Tier East Census Monograph Series Report 11-1 January 2011 2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA The United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 2, requires a decennial census for the
More informationWhat to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber
What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber Thomas L. Brunell At the end of the 2006 term, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision with respect to the Texas
More informationApportionment and Redistricting: Asking geographic questions to address political issues
Apportionment and Redistricting: Asking geographic questions to address political issues https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/united_states_house_of_representatives%2c_2017.svg Gerrymandered
More informationRedistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case
Redistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case Megan A. Gall, PhD, GISP Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law mgall@lawyerscommittee.org @DocGallJr Fundamentals Decennial
More informationGuide to 2011 Redistricting
Guide to 2011 Redistricting Texas Legislative Council July 2010 1 Guide to 2011 Redistricting Prepared by the Research Division of the Texas Legislative Council Published by the Texas Legislative Council
More informationIllinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update
Goals: Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update Raise public awareness of gerrymandering as a key electionyear issue Create press opportunities on gerrymandering to engage the public
More informationRedistricting: Nuts & Bolts. By Kimball Brace Election Data Services, Inc.
Redistricting: Nuts & Bolts By Kimball Brace Election Data Services, Inc. Reapportionment vs Redistricting What s the difference Reapportionment Allocation of districts to an area US Congressional Districts
More informationCase 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 94-1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 37
Case 1:17-cv-01427-TCB-WSD-BBM Document 94-1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 37 REPLY REPORT OF JOWEI CHEN, Ph.D. In response to my December 22, 2017 expert report in this case, Defendants' counsel submitted
More informationMATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics
MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics Lecture 15 July 13, 2015 Slides prepared by Iian Smythe for MATH 1340, Summer 2015, at Cornell University 1 Gerrymandering Variation on The Gerry-mander, Boston Gazette,
More informationRedrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan
Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan 2 Why Does Redistricting Matter? 3 Importance of Redistricting District maps have
More informationAPPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966
APPORTIONMENT The League of Women Voters of the United States believes that congressional districts and government legislative bodies should be apportioned substantially on population. The League is convinced
More informationOrigin of the problem of prison-based gerrymandering
Comments of Peter Wagner, Executive Director, Prison Policy Initiative and Brenda Wright, Vice President for Legal Strategies, Dēmos, on the preparation of a report from the Special Joint Committee on
More informationWho Speaks for the Poor? The Implications of Electoral Geography for the Political Representation of Low-Income Citizens
Who Speaks for the Poor? The Implications of Electoral Geography for the Political Representation of Low-Income Citizens Karen Long Jusko Stanford University kljusko@stanford.edu May 24, 2016 Prospectus
More informationWhere Do You Draw the Line?
Where Do You Draw the Line? A Look at Maryland s Redistricting Policy Erin Chase, Nevin Hall, Carly Hviding, Nicholas Shenton Governor s Summer Internship Program August 6, 2015 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgments
More informationLocal Opportunities for Redistricting Reform
Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform March 2016 Research commissioned by Wisconsin Voices for Our Democracy 2020 Coalition Introduction The process of redistricting has long-lasting impacts on
More informationMillions to the Polls
Millions to the Polls PRACTICAL POLICIES TO FULFILL THE FREEDOM TO VOTE FOR ALL AMERICANS THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR FORMERLY INCARCERATED PERSONS j. mijin cha & liz kennedy THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR FORMERLY INCARCERATED
More informationWhen Equal Is Not Always Fair: Senate Malapportionment and its Effect on Enacting Legislation
Res Publica - Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 7 2016 When Equal Is Not Always Fair: Senate Malapportionment and its Effect on Enacting Legislation Lindsey Alpert Illinois Wesleyan
More informationState redistricting, representation,
State redistricting, representation, and competition Corwin Smidt - Assoc. Prof. of Political Science @ MSU January 10, 2018 1 of 23 1/10/18, 3:52 PM State redistricting, representation, and competition
More informationRecommended Congressional Plan Governor s Redistricting Advisory Committee
Recommended Congressional Plan Governor s Redistricting Advisory Committee Governor s Redistricting Advisory Committee Membership Jeanne Hitchcock, Chair Senate President Miller House Speaker Busch Richard
More informationIvy Global. Reading Passage 3: History with Graph Practice for the New SAT (2016)
Reading Passage 3: History with Graph Practice for the New SAT (2016) Problem Set 3: 11 Questions Reading: Social Science/History Passage with Graph Line 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Questions 23-33 are based on
More informationCooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).
Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017). ELECTIONS AND REDISTRICTING TOP 8 REDISTRICTING CASES SINCE 2010 Plaintiffs alleged that the North Carolina legislature violated the Equal Protection Clause when it increased
More informationObjectives. 1. Warm-Up. 2. National/State Legislatures Worksheet. 3. Congressional Membership Notes. 4. Video Clip US Congress. 5.
Warm-Up 1. What does bicameral mean? 2. Why did the Framers choose to have a two-house legislature? 3. Which house do you think is most important and why? Objectives Describe the bicameral structure and
More informationTestimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006
Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government Given in writing to the Assembly Standing Committee on Governmental Operations and Assembly
More informationFor more information, visit us at or us at
1 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. John Payton President and Director-Counsel NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 212.965.2200 800.221.7822 Fax 212.226.7592
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND HOWARD LEE GORRELL ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-02975 (WDQ) MARTIN O MALLEY, ) in his Official Capacity as ) Governor
More informationOregon Progressive Party Position on Bill at 2017 Session of Oregon Legislature:
March 23, 2017 411 S.W. 2nd Avenue Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 503-548-2797 info@progparty.org Oregon Progressive Party Position on Bill at 2017 Session of Oregon Legislature: HB 2211: Oppose Dear Committee:
More informationRedistricting Matters
Redistricting Matters Protect Your Vote Common Cause Minnesota (CCMN) is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to restoring the core values of American democracy, reinventing an open, honest
More information16 Ohio U.S. Congressional Districts: What s wrong with this picture?
Gerrymandering Gerrymandering happens when the party in power draws district lines to rig elections to favor one political party over another. Both Republicans and Democrats have done it. Gerrymandering
More informationNew York Redistricting Memo Analysis
New York Redistricting Memo Analysis March 1, 2010 This briefing memo explains the current redistricting process in New York, describes some of the current reform proposals being considered, and outlines
More informationA STATISTICAL EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING IN CALIFORNIA:
A STATISTICAL EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING IN CALIFORNIA: 1974 2004 1 Paul Del Piero ( 07) Politics Department Pomona College Claremont, CA Paul.DelPiero@Pomona.edu
More informationCITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER
CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER Congressional Redistricting: Understanding How the Lines are Drawn LESSON PLAN AND ACTIVITIES All rights reserved. No part of this lesson plan may be reproduced in any form or by
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 702. Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION S 1 SENATE BILL 0 Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Senators Smith, Clark, J. Jackson (Primary Sponsors); Bryant,
More informationGerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local
Gerrymandering: the serpentine art VCW State & Local What is gerrymandering? Each state elects a certain number of congressional Reps. Process is controlled by the party in power in the state legislature
More informationThe Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey
The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey Andrew Reamer George Washington Institute of Public Policy George Washington University Association of Public
More informationPutting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative
Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative Gerrymandering is the practice of stacking the deck in favor of the candidates of one party and underrepresenting its opponents by drawing
More informationMathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College
Mathematics of Voting Systems Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College Arrow s Impossibility Theorem 1) No special treatment of particular voters or candidates 2) Transitivity A>B and B>C implies
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 96 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVID J. MCMANUS, JR., et al.,
More informationTexas Voting & Elections (Chapter 04) Dr. Michael Sullivan. Texas State Government GOVT 2306 Houston Community College
Texas Voting & Elections (Chapter 04) Dr. Michael Sullivan Texas State Government GOVT 2306 Houston Community College AGENDA 1. Current Events 2. Political Participation in Texas 3. Voting Trends 4. Summary
More informationILLINOIS (status quo)
(status quo) KEY POINTS: The state legislature draws congressional districts, subject only to federal constitutional and statutory limitations. The legislature also has the first opportunity to draw state
More informationRecent Court Decisions about the Census, Adjusting for Census Undercount and the Use of Census Data to Apportion Congress and the Electoral College
Recent Court Decisions about the Census, Adjusting for Census Undercount and the Use of Census Data to Apportion Congress and the Electoral College Introduction State officials have often assumed that
More informationCITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER. Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion
CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion LESSON PLAN AND ACTIVITIES All rights reserved. No part of this lesson plan may
More informationModule 7 - Congressional Representation
Congressional Representation Inquire: How are Members of Congress Chosen? Overview When the framers were writing the Constitution, the perplexing question of representation was one of the major areas of
More informationREDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?
ALABAMA NAME 105 XX STATE LEGISLATURE Process State legislature draws the lines Contiguity for Senate districts For Senate, follow county boundaries when practicable No multimember Senate districts Population
More informationThe Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate
The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu May, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the pro-republican
More informationJulie Lenggenhager. The "Ideal" Female Candidate
Julie Lenggenhager The "Ideal" Female Candidate Why are there so few women elected to positions in both gubernatorial and senatorial contests? Since the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920
More informationExhibit 4. Case 1:15-cv TDS-JEP Document Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 8
Exhibit 4 Case 1:15-cv-00399-TDS-JEP Document 187-4 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 8 Case 1:15-cv-00399-TDS-JEP Document 187-4 Filed 09/15/17 Page 2 of 8 Memorandum From: Ruth Greenwood, Senior Legal Counsel
More informationClaremont McKenna College April 21, 2010 Douglas Johnson Ian Johnson David Meyer
REDISTRICTING IN AMERICA A State-by-State Analysis This Rose Institute report surveys the legislative and congressional redistricting process in each of the 50 states. It finds that state legislative redistricting
More informationMost Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting Debate LACK OF COMPETITION IN ELECTIONS FAILS TO STIR PUBLIC
NEWS Release 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel (202) 419-4350 Fax (202) 419-4399 FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2006, 10:00 AM EDT Most Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting
More informationA Fair Division Solution to the Problem of Redistricting
A Fair ivision Solution to the Problem of edistricting Z. Landau, O. eid, I. Yershov March 23, 2006 Abstract edistricting is the political practice of dividing states into electoral districts of equal
More informationColorado 2014: Comparisons of Predicted and Actual Turnout
Colorado 2014: Comparisons of Predicted and Actual Turnout Date 2017-08-28 Project name Colorado 2014 Voter File Analysis Prepared for Washington Monthly and Project Partners Prepared by Pantheon Analytics
More informationAN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION
Popular Name AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION Ballot Title THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION THAT CHANGES THE MANNER FOR THE DECENNIAL REDISTRICTING
More informationBackground Information on Redistricting
Redistricting in New York State Citizens Union/League of Women Voters of New York State Background Information on Redistricting What is redistricting? Redistricting determines the lines of state legislative
More informationThe Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate
The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu November, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the
More informationLEGAL ISSUES FOR REDISTRICTING IN INDIANA
LEGAL ISSUES FOR REDISTRICTING IN INDIANA By: Brian C. Bosma http://www.kgrlaw.com/bios/bosma.php William Bock, III http://www.kgrlaw.com/bios/bock.php KROGER GARDIS & REGAS, LLP 111 Monument Circle, Suite
More informationMN LET THE PEOPLE VOTE COALITION INFORMATION SHEETS ON SOME PROPOSED CAUCUS RESOLUTIONS FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2018 CAUCUSES JANUARY 22, 2018
MN LET THE PEOPLE VOTE COALITION INFORMATION SHEETS ON SOME PROPOSED CAUCUS RESOLUTIONS FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2018 CAUCUSES JANUARY 22, 2018 PRE-REGISTRATION FOR 16-17 YR OLDS At present in Minnesota, young
More informationCRC Note A publication of the Citizens Research Council of Michigan March Redistricting. Legal and Constitutional Background of Issue
CRC Note 2016-01 A publication of the Citizens Research Council of Michigan March 2016 Exploring the Potential Effects of Evenwel v. Abbott A case before the United States Supreme Court could have implications
More informationPartisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting
Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting An Updated and Expanded Look By: Cynthia Canary & Kent Redfield June 2015 Using data from the 2014 legislative elections and digging deeper
More informationTestimony of Peter Wagner, Executive Director, Prison Policy Initiative. Before the Joint Committee on Judiciary of the Connecticut General Assembly
Peter Wagner Executive Director pwagner@prisonpolicy.org (413) 961-0002 Testimony of Peter Wagner, Executive Director, Prison Policy Initiative Before the Joint Committee on Judiciary of the Connecticut
More informationCase 1:13-cv JKB Document Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B
Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 128-2 Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 128-2 Filed 01/27/17 Page 2 of 8 From: Brandi Calhoun [blc31@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December
More informationThe Effect of North Carolina s New Electoral Reforms on Young People of Color
A Series on Black Youth Political Engagement The Effect of North Carolina s New Electoral Reforms on Young People of Color In August 2013, North Carolina enacted one of the nation s most comprehensive
More informationDeliberative Polling Post- survey
1. On a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is completely unimportant, 10 is extremely important, and 5 is exactly in between, how important do you think each of the following is to being a good citizen? Unimportant
More informationMEMO: The Folmer Redistricting Commission: Neither Independent Nor Nonpartisan
MEMO: The Folmer Redistricting Commission: Neither Independent Nor Nonpartisan Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center 412 N. 3 rd St, Harrisburg, PA 17101 www.pennbpc.org 717-255-7156 To: Editorial Page
More informationRACIAL GERRYMANDERING
Racial Gerrymandering purposeful drawing of boundaries of electoral districts in such a way that dilutes the vote of racial minorities or fails to provide an opportunity for racial minorities to elect
More informationPurpose of Congress. Make laws governing the nation
Basics of Congress Purpose of Congress Make laws governing the nation Framers considered the legislative branch to be the most powerful A member from either chamber may begin the legislative process (excluding
More information9 Advantages of conflictual redistricting
9 Advantages of conflictual redistricting ANDREW GELMAN AND GARY KING1 9.1 Introduction This article describes the results of an analysis we did of state legislative elections in the United States, where
More informationCALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW
CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW : Elimination of the Citizens Redistricting Commission. Changes to the Redistricting Process in California. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. By, Anna Buck J.D.,
More informationGONZALES MARYLAND POLL
GONZALES MARYLAND POLL January 2018 Part 2 General Election Gonzales Maryland Poll P A R T 2 G E N E R A L E L E C T I O N BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY Patrick E. Gonzales graduated magna cum laude from
More informationRedistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009
Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009 Why? Article III, Section 6 of the Constitution of La. Apportionment of Congress & the Subsequent
More informationPartisan Gerrymandering
Partisan Gerrymandering Gary King Institute for Quantitative Social Science Harvard University (talk at Brookline High School, 2/15/2011) Gary King (Harvard) 1 / 23 The Most Predictably Conflictual Issue
More informationTexas Elections Part I
Texas Elections Part I In a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy. Matt Taibbi Elections...a formal decision-making process
More informationEXTENDING THE SPHERE OF REPRESENTATION:
EXTENDING THE SPHERE OF REPRESENTATION: THE IMPACT OF FAIR REPRESENTATION VOTING ON THE IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF CONGRESS November 2013 Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 00 H HOUSE BILL Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. Sponsors: Representatives Blust; Current and Vinson. Referred to: Rules, Calendar, and Operations
More informationMaryland Voter Poll Results: Offshore Wind Power
To: From: Interested Parties Steve Raabe, OpinionWorks Date: Subject: Overview This Maryland voter poll shows very strong support for the offshore wind proposal being considered by the General Assembly.
More informationIncome Distributions and the Relative Representation of Rich and Poor Citizens
Income Distributions and the Relative Representation of Rich and Poor Citizens Eric Guntermann Mikael Persson University of Gothenburg April 1, 2017 Abstract In this paper, we consider the impact of the
More informationCampaigns and Elections
Campaigns and Elections Congressional Elections For the House of Representatives, every state elects a representative from each congressional district in the state. The number of congressional districts
More informationThe California Primary and Redistricting
The California Primary and Redistricting This study analyzes what is the important impact of changes in the primary voting rules after a Congressional and Legislative Redistricting. Under a citizen s committee,
More informationactivists handbook to
activists handbook to TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. What is redistricting? p.1 2. Why is redistricting important? What s wrong with redistricting now? p.2 3. What is possible? p.3 4. Where is reform happening?
More information2009BargagliottieMAA6up.pdf 1
A COURSE IN QUANTITATIVE AND POLITICAL LITERACY Kira Hamman Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto Why? What possessed me to try this? What? What s the curriculum? Who? Should you do it, too? 2009BargagliottieMAA6up.pdf
More informationCh. 5 Test Legislative Branch Government
Name: Date: 1. In 1998, California had forty-five representatives in the U.S. House of Representatives while Louisiana had seven. What accounts for the difference in these numbers? A. area of the states
More informationEvery Eligible Voter Counts: Correctly Measuring American Turnout Rates
Every Eligible Voter Counts: Correctly Measuring American Turnout Rates Dr. Michael P. McDonald Dr. Michael P. McDonald is a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution and an Assistant Professor at George
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session
Senate Bill 691 Judicial Proceedings Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised (Senator Shank, et al.) SB 691 Judiciary Earned Compliance
More informationPurposes of Elections
Purposes of Elections o Regular free elections n guarantee mass political action n enable citizens to influence the actions of their government o Popular election confers on a government the legitimacy
More informationTestimony of Dale Ho. Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. In Support of AB 420
Testimony of Dale Ho Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. In Support of AB 420 California State Assembly Committee on Elections and Redistricting
More informationSummary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal
Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal This initiative would amend Article XI of the Ohio Constitution to transfer responsibility for redrawing congressional district
More informationat New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting
at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public
More informationDiscussion Guide for PRIMARIES in MARYLAND: Open vs. Closed? Top Two/Four or by Party? Plurality or Majority? 10/7/17 note without Fact Sheet bolded
Discussion Guide for PRIMARIES in MARYLAND: Open vs. Closed? Top Two/Four or by Party? Plurality or Majority? DL: Discussion Leader RP: if also have Resource Person from Study 10/7/17 note: It takes about
More informationA New Electoral System for a New Century. Eric Stevens
A New Electoral System for a New Century Eric There are many difficulties we face as a nation concerning public policy, but of these difficulties the most pressing is the need for the reform of the electoral
More informationGonzales Research & Marketing Strategies
Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies Maryland s leader in public opinion polling Maryland Poll Part 1 Most Important Issue Governor s Contest U.S. Senate September 2009 Contact: Laslo Boyd 443-812-4883
More informationRedistricting in Virginia: the Current Scene
Redistricting in Virginia: the Current Scene By Olga Hernandez, with Therese Martin EF-1 A Little Background... Every electoral district shall be composed of contiguous and compact territory and shall
More informationReading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting
Reading Between the Lines their Reform in Iowa, Arizona and California and Ideas for Change in New Jersey Reading Between the Lines Purposes of the Study 1. Prepared for the Eagleton Institute of Politics
More informationNon-Voted Ballots and Discrimination in Florida
Non-Voted Ballots and Discrimination in Florida John R. Lott, Jr. School of Law Yale University 127 Wall Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 432-2366 john.lott@yale.edu revised July 15, 2001 * This paper
More informationThe Texas Legislature
CHAPTER 25 The Texas Legislature LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter you should be able to Define the key terms at the end of the chapter. List the powers and duties of the Legislature, as set
More informationThe Center for Voting and Democracy
The Center for Voting and Democracy 6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 610 Takoma Park, MD 20912 - (301) 270-4616 (301) 270 4133 (fax) info@fairvote.org www.fairvote.org To: Commission to Ensure Integrity and Public
More information