directed to be released on bail. However, the operation of the order dated has been stayed by Hon'ble High Court vide order dated

Transcription

1 State vs. Ashima Chopra FIR No. 42/2014 PS: EOW u/s 420/120 B IPC File taken up today as order passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated received officially. Vide order dated the accused Ashima Chopra was directed to be released on bail. However, the operation of the order dated has been stayed by Hon'ble High Court vide order dated In these circumstances Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail is directed not to release the accused Ashima Chopra in the present case FIR. A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail for compliance. Put up on date fixed i.e New Delhi/

2 Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. M/s Sai Baba Builders and consultants Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. CC No:124/14 Statement of Sh. Santosh Gupta, ld. Counsel for tenant Inis Hi tech Pvt. Ltd. without oath As the matter has been partly settled between the bank and the borrower in terms of Ex.C1, therefore, I may be allowed to withdraw the application filed on behalf of the tenant Inis Hitech Pvt. Ltd. RO&AC New Delhi/

3 Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. M/s Sai Baba Builders and consultants Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. CC No:124/14 Statement of Sh. Ravinder Singh Dakha, Advocate enrollment No:D/939/94 without oath I have instructions to state that the matter has been partly settled with the respondents in respect of the mortgaged property no:r 122, Greater Kailash 1, New Delhi, in terms of letter dated , which is Ex.C1 (filed in connected case No:122/14). Therefore, I may be permitted to withdraw the present case. RO&AC New Delhi/

4 Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. M/s Sai Baba Shelters & Infra Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. CC No:122/14 Statement of Sh. Alok Kumar S/o Sh. Radha Govind Agarwal, Chief Manager, at present posted at Branch at Batra Hospital, New Delhi on oath. I have filed the present case. I have instructions to state that the matter has been partly settled with the respondents in respect of the mortgaged property no:r 122, Greater Kailash 1, New Delhi, in terms of letter dated , which is Ex.C1. Therefore, I may be permitted to withdraw the present case. RO&AC New Delhi/

5 Ishaque Khan Vs. Rajeev Aggarwal CC No:449/1/ Complainant along with counsel. IO is not present today. IO be called and matter be listed for consideration along with connected case on New Delhi/

6 FIR No.308/204 PS: Sangam Vihar State vs. Ishaque Khan etc Accused Ishaque Khan and Mahender along with counsel. Other accused on bail with counsel. Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant. Case is fixed for argument on charge qua the accused Mahender today. Part argument on charge heard. Since IO is not present today. IO be called for the next date and matter be listed for further argument on charge on New Delhi/

7 FIR No. 451/2004 PS: Kalkaji State vs. Nitin Tuli Accused on bail alongwith counsel. No PW present today. As per the report received on the summons issued to PW SI Suraj Prasad, he has expired on Copy of order passed by DCP, Security, New Delhi is also enclosed with the report. Perused the same. In view of the report received the name of PW SI Suraj Prasad is dropped from the list of the witnesses. PW Manjeet Kumar Singh and PW Concerned Clerk from Trade Mark Registry, Salt Lake, Kolkata are absent despite service of summons. Issue BWs against both of them in the sum of Rs.5000/ each, through IO, for New Delhi/

8 FIR No.270/10 PS:CB/SED State vs. A.S. Arora etc Accused A.S. Arora produced from JC along with LAC Sh. Gautam Chakravarty. Proceeding against accused Lajpat already abated. All other accused on bail. IO/SI Arun Verma is not present today. FSL report is not filed despite directions. FSL report be called through DCP concerned, and IO be also called for , rehnumai on before JRC. New Delhi/

9 FIR No. 146/10 PS: CB/SED State vs. A.S. Arora etc Accused A.S. Arora produced from JC along with LAC Sh. Gautam Chakravarty. Accused Kiran & Subhash Arora on bail. Proceeding against accused Lajpat already abated. Supplementary charge sheet along with FSL report already filed by the IO which is fixed for consideration today. Copy of the FSL report be supplied to the accused persons. IO/SI S.K. Jha is not present today. IO/SK Jha be called for , rehnumai on before JRC and matter be listed for consideration on the supplementary charge sheet on the next date. New Delhi/

10 FIR No. 152/10 PS: CB/SED State vs. A.S. Arora etc Accused A.S. Arora produced from JC along with LAC Sh. Gautam Chakravarty. Accused Gulshan Rai on bail. Proceeding against accused Lajpat already abated. IO/SI Naresh is present today. Time sought by the IO for filing of FSL report. Head the submission. FSL report is not being filed despite directions. FSL report be called through DCP concerned, and IO be also called for , rehnumai on before JRC. New Delhi/

11 FIR No. 151/10 PS: Ambedkar Nagar State vs. A.S. Arora etc Accused A.S. Arora produced from JC along with LAC Sh. Gautam Chakravarty. Accused Gulshan Rai on bail. Proceeding against accused Lajpat already abated. IO/SI S.K. Jha is not present today. FSL report is not filed despite directions. FSL report be called through DCP concerned, and IO be also called for , rehnumai on before JRC. New Delhi/

12 FIR No. 154/10 PS: EOW State vs. A.S. Arora etc Accused A.S. Arora produced from JC along with LAC Sh. Gautam Chakravarty. Accused Gulshan Rai, Rajo Devi and Deepak on bail. Proceeding against accused Lajpat already abated. IO/SI Naresh is present today. Time sought by the IO for filing of FSL report. Head the submission. FSL report is not being filed despite directions. FSL report be called through DCP concerned, and IO be also called for , rehnumai on before JRC. New Delhi/

13 FIR No. 155/10 PS: CB/SED State vs. A.S. Arora etc Accused A.S. Arora produced from JC along with LAC Sh. Gautam Chakravarty. Accused Gulshan Rai on bail. Proceeding against accused Lajpat already abated. IO/SI S.K. Jha is not present today. FSL report is not filed despite directions. FSL report be called through DCP concerned, and IO be also called for , rehnumai on before JRC. New Delhi/

14 CBI Vs. Santosh Kumar RC No:140/06/ Ld. APP for the CBI. Niab court for the CBI. Accused on bail along with counsel. No PW present today. However, no explanation is furnished by CBI as to why the witnesses have not been summoned for today when the case is fixed for PE. Witnesses be summoned for PE on New Delhi/

15 FIR No. 227/09 PS: EOW/SED State vs. Raj Kumar Jain etc Ld. Counsel for the complainant. Complainant is not present due to marriage in his family. IO/SI Ajeet Jha is not present. It is stated that IO is out of station due to official work. Complainant be called, through IO, for IO be also called for next date. New Delhi/

16 FIR No:91/00 PS: CR Park State Vs. Cancellation Statement of Sh. Shivek Trehan, Ld. Counsel for proposed accused Sanjiv Dewan without oath As per the order dated passed by Ld. ASJ/SED, Saket, whereby the summoning order dated passed by this Hon ble Court has been set aside, both parties including the revisionist have been given opportunity to be heard while addressing arguments on summoning afresh. However, as counsel for the revisionist/proposed accused I state that since the accused has no locus at a pre summoning stage, I shall not be addressing arguments on summoning. However, I would request an opportunity to be heard on the application u/s 340 Cr.PC filed on the last date of hearing i.e RO&AC New Delhi/

17 CC No: Statement of on oath. RO&AC New Delhi/

18 State Vs. FIR No: PW Statement of on oath. Xxxxxxxxxby ld. Counsel for accused. RO&AC New Delhi/

19 FIR No. PS: State vs New Delhi/

20 CC No. 70/01 Shehbaz Hussain versus Ansar Ahmad Complainant in person. Complainant seeks adjournment as Counsel is not available today. Submissions heard. Put up for consideration on New Delhi/

21 FIR No. 91/00 PS: CR Park State versus Cancellation Complainant in person. Counsel for the accused persons. Proxy Counsel for accused Vikram. Already received order dated of the Court of Sh. Raj Kumar Tripathi, Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, wherein the summoning order has been set aside. Counsel for the accused submits that since accused has no locus at pre summoning stage, hence he shall not be addressing arguments on summoning. Submissions heard. Statement of the Counsel for the accused is also recorded to this effect. Complainant submits that he want to file the Criminal Revision. Application u/s 340 CrPC moved on behalf of the accused is also pending. Put up for consideration on the pending application and further proceedings on New Delhi/

22 FIR No. 199/09 PS: EOW State versus Arun Kumar Sharma etc IO in person. Proceedings against accused Omprakash Sharma already abated vide order dated Accused Arun Kumar Sharma absent. Accused Chander Singh Chaudhary in person with Counsel. Accused Saket Sharma Bhardwaj and Sanjay Sharma Bhardwaj are not present. Counsel for the accused Arun Kumar Sharma. Copy of charge sheet and documents be supplied to the accused persons present today. An exemption application moved on behalf of accused Arun Kumar Sharma. In view of the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is allowed for today only. An application for grant of bail moved on behalf of accused Chander Singh Chaudhary. Accused Chander Singh Chaudhary is admitted on bail on furnishing bail bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/ alongwith one surety in the like amount. Bail bond furnished and accepted. As per the report of process sent to accused Saket Sharma Bhardwaj, he is not residing at the address given. It is submitted by the IO that accused Saket Sharma Bhardwaj was admitted on bail. Under these circumstances notice be also issued to the surety of the accused

23 Saket Sharma Bhardwaj and fresh summons to accused Saket Sharma Bhardwaj through IO for date fixed. Process sent to accused Sanjay Sharma Bhardwaj received back unserved. It is submitted by the IO that the said accused is in police custody in case bearing FIR No. 119/13, U/s 406/420/120 B IPC, PS EOW, Unit III, Mumbai. In view of the aforesaid, production warrants be issued against the accused Sanjay Sharma Bhardwaj through DCP, EOW Unit III, Mumbai for New Delhi/

24 FIR No. 217/03 PS: Lajpat Nagar State versus Lov Chaudhary Accused on bail with Counsel. Part arguments heard on behalf of the accused. Put up for further arguments on behalf of the State for New Delhi/

25 FIR No. 264/08 PS: Lodhi Colony State versus Swami Sadachari Complainant in person. Accused on bail. An application moved on behalf of the accused for discharge. Copy of the same be supplied to the Put up for arguments on charge on New Delhi/

26 FIR No. 282/11 PS: Crime Branch State versus Surender Kumar Bhasin Accused on bail with Counsel. No PW is present. PW SI Rajiv Kakkar and HC Rajbir Singh absent despite service. Issue BW in a sum of Rs.5,000/ each against them for date fixed. Put up for remaining PE on PWs be summoned for date fixed. New Delhi/

27 RC No. 6E/2005/EOW 1 CBI versus Krishan Kumar Khurana etc Ld. APP for the CBI. Vide order dated all accused persons are exempted through their Counsel till arguments on charge are concluded. Counsels for the accused persons. An application moved on behalf of the accused no. 7 Harish Khandelwal for supplying documents. Copy of the same supplied to the Ld. APP for the CBI. IO be called with deficient copies for date fixed. NBW issued against the accused Ashwani Dhingra received back unserved. Issue fresh NBW against the accused Ashwani Dhingra and notice to his surety through IO for New Delhi/

28 FIR No. 160/14 PS: Defence Colony State versus Salil Kapoor Accused produced from Narnaul jail alongwith proxy Counsel. IO in person. Adjournment sought by the proxy Counsel for the accused on the ground that main Counsel is not available today. Submissions heard. Put up for arguments on charge on , rehnumai on New Delhi/

29 FIR No. 296/14 PS: Defence Colony State versus Salil Kapoor Accused produced from Narnaul jail alongwith proxy Counsel. IO in person. Adjournment sought by the proxy Counsel for the accused on the ground that main Counsel is not available today. Submissions heard. Put up for arguments on charge on , rehnumai on New Delhi/

30 CC No. 86/1/12 and 87/1/12 Vinod Singh versus Kuber Counsel for the complainant with complainant. Accused with proxy Counsel. Proxy Counsel for the accused seeks pass over for 2:00 pm as main Counsel is not available. Counsel for the complainant submits that he is not available in post lunch session. Submissions heard. Put up for cross examination of the complainant witness on New Delhi/

31 FIR No. 160/12 PS: Crime Branch State versus Mohd Asif Accused absent. PW Constable Vipin Tyagi and Constable Amit are present. Discharged unexamined for today only as the accused is not present. Issue NBW against the accused with notice to his surety for New Delhi/

32 FIR No. 145/01 PS: Greater Kailash, Crime Branch State versus Gurmeet Singh Accused on bail with Counsel. PW Inspector Iashwar Singh absent, however request received on his behalf. PW HC Ajeet Singh is present. Discharged unexamined for today only as no time left. No other PW is present. Put up for remaining PE on PWs be summoned for date fixed. New Delhi/

33 FIR No. 439/07 PS: Kalkaji State versus Nadeem etc Accused Gaurav on bail with Counsel. Accused Nadeem and Shahana absent. Exemption applications moved on behalf of accused Nadeem and Shahana. In view of the reason mentioned in the applications the exemption is allowed for today only. Part arguments on charge heard. Put up for remaining arguments on charge on and IO be called for date fixed. New Delhi/

34 FIR No. 631/06 PS: Kalkaji State versus Vibhay Kumar etc Accused Vibhay Kumar Aggarwal on bail with Counsel. Accused Praful Verma on bail. Examination of PW 4 Rajpal Narang is recorded. Opportunity granted to Counsel for the accused Vibhay Kumar Aggarwal and accused Prafful Kumar to cross examine the witness which is nil. Examination in chief of PW 5 Satender Gulia is recorded. His further examination in chief deferred for want of case property. PW 1 GP Sharma is examined and cross examined on behalf of accused Vibhay Kumar Aggarwal. Cross examination deferred on behalf of accused Prafful Verma as no time left. Issue process to superdar to produce the case property i.e. five HCL computers installed at Institute of Management and Technology on date fixed. No other PW is present today. Put up for remaining PE on PWs be summoned for date fixed. New Delhi/

35 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha versus unknown PS: Kotla Mubarakpur Fresh complaint is received. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the complainant. Arguments heard. Let Action Taken Report be called for from the concerned SHO. Complainant is directed to provide extra copy of the complaint to the Naib Court concerned for onward transmission to the concerned police station. Copy of this order be also sent to the concerned police station. New Delhi/

36 TA No. 34/15 Monnet Ispat & Energy versus Joint Trading Service etc Counsel for the applicant. Let previous order be complied for New Delhi/

37 TA No. 12/15 Chetan Shandilya versus M/s Craft Decor None for the applicant. In the interest of justice no adverse order is passed. Put up for clarifications on New Delhi/

38 FIR No. 310/94 PS: Badarpur, Crime Branch State versus Pushkar Raj Accused on bail with Counsel. PW Ravi Chabra is absent, however his Counsel is present who has filed vakalatnama on his behalf and seeks adjournment as today the said witness is not available. No other PW is present. Put up for remaining PE on PWs be summoned for date fixed. New Delhi/

39 FIR No. 536/94 PS: SNP, Crime Branch State versus Pushkar Raj etc Accused Anil Kumar and Jitender have been discharged vide order dated Accused Pushkar Raj and Kewal Kishan on bail with Counsel. PW ASI Rohtash is absent. Discharged unexamined for today only as no time left. No other PW is present. Put up for remaining PE on PWs be summoned for date fixed. New Delhi/

40 FIR No. 111/08 PS: Sangam Vihar State versus Sidharth Sapra etc Accused Sidharth Sapra, Subhash Chand, Bhupinder Singh, Ram Karan and Ram Milan Singh on bail. Accused Ramesh absent. An exemption application moved on behalf of accused Ramesh. In view of the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is allowed for today only. PW HC Udaivir and Constable Pyare Lal are present. Accused persons seek adjournment as today their Counsel is not available today. Submissions heard. In view of the aforesaid PW present are discharged unexamined for today only. Put up for remaining PE on PWs be summoned for date fixed. IO be also called with statement u/s 161 CrPC of HC Rajkumar in terms of previous order for date fixed. New Delhi/

41 FIR No. PS: State versus New Delhi/

42 FIR No. PS: State versus New Delhi/

43 FIR No. PS: State versus New Delhi/