Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM.
|
|
|
- Valentine Perkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FIR No.1443/15 PS Tilak Nagar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
2 FIR No.235/13 PS Paschim Vihar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
3 FIR No.235/13 PS Paschim Vihar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
4 FIR No.950/15 PS Vikas Puri Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
5 FIR No.387/13 PS Hari Nagar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
6 FIR No.113/13 PS Nihal Vihar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
7 CC No. Manju Vs. Ramesh Chand & Ors. : None for the complainant. IO SI Md. Haroon in person. IO has filed the report. The application be put up alongwith the file for consideration on date already fixed i.e West/THC :
8 FIR No.354/16 PS Hari Nagar State Vs. Randhir Singh : Ld. APP for the State. Sh. Ravinder Chadha, counsel for applicant / accused. This is a bail application u/s 437 CrPC filed on behalf of accused Randhir Singh. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel that the present complaint is false and fabricated. No such incident as alleged by the prosecutrix has occurred. He submits that the present dispute was an office related dispute which has been given the color of sexual harassment. Further, it is submitted that there is no such complaint ever filed against the accused in this regard, also, the accused has clear antecedents. He has two minor children. Ld. Counsel for accused has also argued that in the present matter the offence u/s 354 IPC is not made out as per the allegations of the complainant. Other offences, if at all, made out are also bailable in nature. Ld. Counsel has also relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court Of India, as per which he submits that as there is no requirement of the accused in interrogation, he may be admitted to bail. Ld. APP for the state on the other hand has strongly opposed the present application. She submits that in the FIR as well as
9 : 2 : in the statement u/s 164 CrPC, the complainant has made clear allegations that the accused was sexually harassing her. In these circumstances, Ld. APP submits that offences are prima facie made out and hence, bail application may be dismissed. As per the report of the IO, he has not mentioned any ground that the prolonged custody of the accused is required for investigation. Admittedly, prima facie clearly offences are made out against the accused. However, veracity of these allegations can be tested out during the trial. At this stage, considering that there is no previous involvement of the accused, accused Randhir Singh is admitted to bail on furnishing a bail bond / personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/ with one surety in the like amount. Further, it is directed that the accused shall not try to contact any witness in any manner. Bail bond furnished on behalf of accused is accepted. The application seeking bail of accused Randhir Singh is accordingly disposed off. West/THC :
10 FIR No.113/13 PS Nihal Vihar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. W/SI Koyal in person. Accused persons namely Tirath Lal, Bharat Lal and Kalawati produced from JC. They be sent to JC and produced on at 12:30 PM. West/THC :
11 FIR No.49/05 PS Kirti Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused persons namely Tirath Lal, Bharat Lal and Kalawati produced from JC. They be sent to JC and produced on at 12:30 PM. West/THC :
12 FIR No.118/13 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
13 FIR No.231/15 PS Vikas Puri : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
14 FIR No.103/13 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
15 CC No. Ruby Khanna Vs. Yashpal Khanna : Complainant in person with legal aid counsel Sh. B C Jain. Put up for purpose fixed on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
16 FIR No.448/12 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
17 FIR No.231/15 PS Vikas Puri : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
18 DD No.13 A dated PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. IO ASI Hari Kishan in person. IO is directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. Put up for further proceedings on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
19 FIR No.535/11 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Complainant in person. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
20 FIR No.263/09 PS Vikas Puri : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person with counsel. Complainant in person. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
21 CC No.60/1 Sonia Singh Vs. Rajpal & Ors. : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondent in person. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
22 CC No.556/1 Harvinder Kaur Vs. Madan Singh : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondent in person with counsel. Income affidavit of respondent filed today. Copy supplied. At request, put up for further proceedings on West/THC :
23 CC No.270/1 Megha Dhiman Vs. Gaurav Dhiman : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondent in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
24 FIR No.39/09 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person with counsel. Counsel for complainant. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
25 Ex No.123/1 Manmeet Walia Vs. Mohinder Pal Singh : Counsel for complainant. None for respondent. At request, put up for appearance of parties / purpose fixed on West/THC :
26 Ex No.49/15 Manmeet Walia Vs. Mohinder Pal Singh : Counsel for DH. None for JD. At request, put up for appearance of JD / purpose fixed on West/THC :
27
28 FIR No.774/14 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person with counsel. Complainant in person. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
29 CC No.41/1 Preeti Kaur Vs. Balbir Singh Lakhar Pal : Complainant in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
30 FIR No.465/12 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Retd. SI Surender is present. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
31 CC No.145/1 Mohini Singh Vs. Uma Kant Singh : Complainant in person. Respondent in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
32 CC No.311/1 Poonam Vs. Som Nath Dua & Ors. supplied. : Complainant in person. Counsel for the respondent. Certain documents filed on behalf of the respondent. Copy At request, put up for appearance of respondent / purpose fixed on West/THC :
33 FIR No.296/10 PS Paschim Vihar : Ld. APP for the State. All the accused persons are present in person. Complainant / PW Shalini Kwatra is present. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
34 FIR No.289/09 PS Vikas Puri : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person with counsel. Complainant is present. PW be called as per previous order for the next date. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
35 FIR No.345/13 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Complainant / PW Sonam Kapoor is present. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
36 FIR No.210/12 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Both the accused persons are present with counsel. Complainant / PW Maya is present. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
37 CC No. Anita kumari Vs. Jaswant Singh & Ors. : Complainant in person. None for the respondent. At request, put up for appearance of respondent / purpose fixed on West/THC :
38 CC No. Anjali Vs. Brij Mohan Chauhan : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondent in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
39 CC No.53/1 Gurjeet Kaur Vs. Anmol Singh : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondents in person with counsel. Vakalatnama filed by the counsel for respondent. Same is taken on record. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
40 CC No. Nazma Vs. Rahis Saifi & Ors. Fresh petition u/s 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 has been received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. : Counsel for complainant. At request, put up for consideration on at 12:30 PM. West/THC :
41 CC No.478/1 Neha Madan Vs. Ramit Madan : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondent in person with counsel. Affidavit of respondent no.1 is already filed on record. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
42 CC No.576/1 Rajni Vs. Raju & Ors. Saxena. : Complainant in person with legal aid counsel Ms. Dipika At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
43 CC No.415/1 Jyoti Vs. Jasbir Singh : Complainant in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
44 CC No.315/1 Manisha Bablani Vs. Naveen Bablani : Counsel for complainant. Respondent in person. At request, put up for appearance of complainant / purpose fixed on West/THC :
45 CC No. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Manvinder Singh & Ors. Fresh petition u/s 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 has been received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. : Complainant in person with counsel. At request, put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. West/THC :
46 CC No.123/1 Megha Verma Vs. Tarun Verma & Ors. : Complainant in person with counsel. Respondent in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
47 CC No.77/1 Rajni Vs. Anil & Ors. : Complainant in person. Respondent in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
48 CC No.77/1 Rajni Vs. Anil & Ors. : Complainant in person. Respondent in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
49 FIR No.402/11 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
50 FIR No.133/12 PS Vikas Puri : Ld. APP for the State. Accused Khem Raj is declared PO. Accused Vimla in person. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
51 FIR No.201/12 PS Nihal Vihar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Ms. Dipika Saxena, legal aid counsel for complainant. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
52 FIR No.39/14 PS Nihal Vihar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused Sanjay Ahuja in person with counsel. Remaining two accused persons are absent. An application seeking exemption of accused Sanjay Ahuja and Dimpy from personal appearance has been filed by the counsel for accused. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed for today only. IO in person. He be called afresh for the next date. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
53 FIR No.334/11 PS Nihal Vihar : Ld. APP for the State. None. Put up for appearance of accused / purpose fixed on West/THC :
54 FIR No.1208/15 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
55 FIR No.362/15 PS Kirti Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. None. Put up for appearance of accused / purpose fixed on West/THC :
56 CC No.580/1 Varsha Vs. Nakul Saxena. : Complainant in person with legal aid counsel Ms. Dipika At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
57
58 FIR No.420/13 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Counsel for accused. Complainant is also absent. An application seeking exemption of accused Rajender Parsad from personal appearance has been filed by the counsel for accused. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed for today only. Complainant be called as per previous order for the next date. At request, put up for appearance of parties / purpose fixed on West/THC :
59 FIR No.40/13 PS Nihal Vihar : Ld. APP for the State. Both accused in person with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
60 CC No.42/1 Daljeet Saini Vs. Avtar Singh & Ors. : Complainant in person. None for the respondent. At request, put up for appearance of respondent / purpose fixed on West/THC :
61 CC No.203/1 Lily Bhasin Vs. Anil Kumar Bhasin : None for the complainant. Respondent in person. At request, put up for appearance of complainant / purpose fixed on West/THC :
62
63 CC No.473/1 Neeru Nagpal Vs. Sachin Nagpal : Complainant in person. Father of respondent with counsel. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
64 FIR No.593/02 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused in person. Counsel for complainant. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
65 FIR No.443/03 PS Kirti Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. All accused are present except accused Dalip Singh with counsel. An application seeking exemption of accused Dalip Singh from personal appearance has been filed by the counsel for accused. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed for today only. Complainant is absent. She be called to appear in person on the next date. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
66
67 FIR No.12/05 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. All accused are present except accused Veena and Monica. An application seeking exemption of accused Veena and Monica from personal appearance has been filed by the counsel for accused. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed for today only. Counsel for complainant. At request, put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
68 FIR No.315/02 PS Vikas Puri : Ld. APP for the State. Accused is present with counsel. Complainant / PW Payal Sharma in person. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
69 FIR No.551/06 PS Hari Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. Accused is present with counsel. Complainant / PW Anita in person. She is discharged un examined for today and bound down to appear on next date of hearing. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
70 FIR No.802/07 PS Tilak Nagar : Ld. APP for the State. None of the accused is present. Put up for purpose fixed on West/THC :
directed to be released on bail. However, the operation of the order dated has been stayed by Hon'ble High Court vide order dated
State vs. Ashima Chopra FIR No. 42/2014 PS: EOW u/s 420/120 B IPC 12 10 2015 File taken up today as order passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated 07 10 2015 received officially. Vide order dated 13
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman. Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person. Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD been settled. It is submitted by both the parties that the matter has On
IN THE COURT OF KUSHAL SINGLA, PCS. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Ist CLASS, CHANDIGARH.
IN THE COURT OF KUSHAL SINGLA, PCS. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Ist CLASS, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Case No : 572 Date of Instt. : 17.2.2016 Date of decision : 12.6.2017 State Versus Rohit Sharma s/o Sh. MM Sharma r/o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.REV.P. 76/2009 Reserved on: 30th April, 2012 Decided on: 11th July, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.REV.P. 76/2009 Reserved on: 30th April, 2012 Decided on: 11th July, 2012 ANIL KUMAR... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Malik and Mr.
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 30 th July, CRL.M.C. No.2836/2015. Versus
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 30 th July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. No.2836/2015 RAJ KAUSHAL Represented by:... Petitioner Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Habibur Rehman, Advocates
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINA PROCEDURE. CRL.REV.P. 523/2009 & Crl. M.A. No /2009(Stay)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINA PROCEDURE CRL.REV.P. 523/2009 & Crl. M.A. No. 10941/2009(Stay) Reserved on: 17th February, 2012 Decided on: 1st March, 2012 YASHPAL KUMAR
-:1:- IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURTS ROHINI DELHI
-:1:- IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURTS ROHINI DELHI SC No. 100/2 dated 20/12/2006 Date of Decision: 02/04/2007 State Versus 1. SURESH S/o Sh. Sukhbir Singh R/o
versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 11, 2015 + BAIL APPLN. 1596/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos.7527/2015 & 7810/2015 HARI SINGH Through: versus... Petitioner Mr.Deepak Prakash,
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 20 th October, 2015
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4440/2015 Judgment delivered on: 20 th October, 2015 RAMINDER SINGH BAKSHI & ORS... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Arya, Adv. versus STATE
Bail Application No. 459; 460 & 461 State Vs 1 Jyoti 2 Sunita 3 Pooja FIR No.778/15 U/s 323/341/354/34 IPC PS Adarsh Nagar
Bail Application No. 424;425;426;427 State Vs 1 Shakuntala Dhankhar 2 K.K. Khankhar 3 Anupriya 4 Ajay Dhankhar FIR No. 1/2016 U/s 498A/406 IPC PS K.N. Katju Marg. Present: Mr. Joginder Malik ld. PP for
acquitted for the offence U/s 25/54/59 of Arms Act. 437(A) of Cr.P.C. File be consigned to record room. File be consigned
State Vs. Pawan Kumar @ Vicky FIR No:342/2012 U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act P. S. Kalkaji/AATS/SED 27 03 2015 Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused on bail along with counsel. Statement of accused recorded today.
CC No. 531/1/16 & 534/6/16 BRM Lease & Credit Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Chhabra
CC No. 531/1/16 & 534/6/16 BRM Lease & Credit Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Chhabra Fresh complaint case U/Sec.138 NI Act is received by way of assignment. It be checed and registered. Present: Counsel for the
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Revision 11/2004 Sri Pintu Das, Son of Late Arun Das Resident of Philobari
versus Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Kumar. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. for R-2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(CRL) 1018/2010 & Crl. M.A.No. 8566/2010 Reserved on: 13th February, 2012 Decided on: 14th March, 2012 RAKESH KUMAR Through Mr. Nitin
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3603/2015 & Crl.M.A.12792/2015 Reserved on: Date of decision:
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3603/2015 & Crl.M.A.12792/2015 Reserved on: 10.12.2015 Date of decision: 18.12.2015 VARGHESE CHERIYAN Through... Petitioner Mr.Bharat Sharma, Adv. with
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: CRL.A. 121/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: 01.04.2014 CRL.A. 121/2010 RAHUL & ORS. Through: Mr M.L. Yadav, Adv.... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI Through: Mr
Suit No. : 570/15 13/01/2016. Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant.
Suit No. : 570/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant. Vakalatnama filed by the counsel for the defendant alongwith WS. Copy given. Now put up for replication / documents / admission denial
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 997/2014. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 997/2014 RISHI NARULA Through versus Date of Decision : February 05 th, 2016... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Swaroop and Ms. Asha Garg, Advs. STATE( NCT OF
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA. CRIMINAL PETITION No.1413/2014
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1413/2014 1. Mr. RAJESH ANAND PROJECT
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 2 nd December, CRL.M.C. 2392/2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on: 2 nd December, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2392/2015 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) RUPAK RANA AND + CRL.M.C. 3322/2015 RAJPAL RANA STATE & ORS....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Crl. Rev. No. 12/2002. Reserved on October 16, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl. Rev. No. 12/2002 Reserved on October 16, 2008 Pronounced on December 20,2008 Dr. Harish Vohra @ Dr. Harish Bora Through :- Mr.Sumit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972. BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009 Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 16th January,2012 SUDESH KUMAR
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1050/2015 Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015 SWARAJ ALIAS RAJ SHRIKANT THACKREY... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arvind K Nigam, Senior
2. Heard Sri Bhola Singh Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishad Murtza, learned Government Advocate.
Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 3321 of 2012 Petitioner :- Iqbal And Anr. Respondent :- The State Of U.P Thru Home Secy., U.P Govt. Lucknow And Ors. Petitioner Counsel :- Bhola Singh Patel,Pravin Kumar Verma
Matter received by way of transfer. It be checked and
Thomson Press (India) vs. M/s. Khemka Containers Ltd. CS No. 481/16/2002 registered. Matter received by way of transfer. It be checked and None for the plaintiff. Sh. Bhanwar Lal Prajapati, AR of the defendant.
... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP WITH
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 05, 2009 Judgment delivered on : November 10, 2009 + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.136/1998 RAJENDER SINGH @ MASTER Through:... Appellant Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment delivered on: CS(OS) 2248/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment delivered on: 25.07.2012 CS(OS) 2248/2011 MAHESH CHANDER MALIK... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anshuj Dhingra and Mr. Anubhav
SURAJ BHAN THR GPA HOLDER & ORS... Appellants Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Advocates
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 DATE OF DECISION : 7th February, 2014 LA.APP. 632/2011 & CM No. 17689/2013 (for stay) SURAJ BHAN THR GPA HOLDER & ORS.... Appellants
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 638/2009 & Crl.M.A.2384/09 (stay) Date of reserve:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Crl.M.C. 638/2009 & Crl.M.A.2384/09 (stay) Date of reserve: 04.03.2009 Date of decision: 23.03.2009 D.R. PATEL & ORS. Through:
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: Versus...
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: 27.04.2012 SANDEEP DIXIT Through: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate.... PETITIONER STATE Through: Ms.Fizani Husain,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 3710/2007. Date of decision: February 06, 2009.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Crl.M.C. 3710/2007 Date of decision: February 06, 2009 GEETIKA BATRA... Through : Petitioner Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sheel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT. Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011. Reserved on: 18th January, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011 Reserved on: 18th January, 2012 Decided on: 8th February, 2012 JIWAN RAM GUPTA... Petitioner Through:
REGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No. 120 of 2010 % Date of Reserve: July 29, 2010 Date of Order: 12 th August, 2010 12.08.2010 MOHAN LAL JATIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Sud,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.515-516 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 6453-54 of 2015) MUNSHIRAM APPELLANT (S)
... Petitioner Through: Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 16 th March, 2010 + Crl.L.P.No.129/2009 STATE... Petitioner Through: Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP versus RAJESH GUPTA @ TITU... Respondent Through:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010 Decided on: 9th August, 2011. DEEPAK GARG Through: Mr. Vijay Agarwal, Advocate.... Petitioner versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRL.L.P. 316/2013 DATE OF DECISION :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRL.L.P. 316/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 21.01.2014 STATE... Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Additional Standing Counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1051 of 2013 Umesh Prasad Gupta.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Birbal Singh Munda... Opposite Parties Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY.
... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 6 th November, 2009 Judgment Delivered on: 11 th November, 2009 + CRL.REV.P.575/2001 DHARAM PAL Through:... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Mahajan,
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CRL.M.C. 1712/2017 and Crl.M.A /2017. Versus
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1712/2017 and Crl.M.A.6963-64/2017 Decided on: 19 th May, 2017 ABHILASHA CHAHALIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with
Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma with Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advocates
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. 1096/2011 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 2903-2904/2012, 2906-2907/2012 Date of Decision: 29th November, 2012 JASBIR KAUR & ORS.... Petitioners
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2758/2014 BETWEEN: INDRANI BENJAMIN, W/O S.B.SELVARAJ,
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 Date of decision:
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 SHIV KUMAR & ANR. Through: Date of decision: 03.12.2015... Petitioners Mr.Vikas Padora and Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocates. STATE versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. # SUNIL SONU... Appellant! Through: Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. with Mr.J.L.Singh, Advocate.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.A.No.446/2005 % Reserved on: 18 th March, 2010 Date of Decision: 25 th March, 2010 # SUNIL KUMAR @ SONU... Appellant! Through: Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. with
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.672 of 2006 & CRIMINAL M.B. NO.1463 OF 2006 Date of Decision: 14th August, 2007 RADHEY SHYAM Through: Mr. R.K. Thakur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: RC.REV. 522/2011 & CM Nos.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: 07.3.2012 RC.REV. 522/2011 & CM Nos.22570-72/2011 ANIL KUMAR VERMA Through: Mr.Ashutosh, Advocate.... Petitioner
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, 2015 + I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009 VEENA KUMARI Through... Plaintiff Mr.D.S. Vohra, Adv.
A.F.R. ***** This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
1 Court No. - 25 Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 4136 of 2015 Applicant :- Arvind Kejriwal Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P And Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahmood Alam,Mohd. Rijwan Khan Counsel for
CRIMINAL SECTION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)
I) BAIL U/S.439 OF Cr.P.C. :- CRIMINAL SECTION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) 2. Sessions Court's order dismissing the bail 4. No Court fees in case the petitioner is in Jail. Note :- Important information
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NDPS ACT. Judgment reserved on :11th November, Judgment delivered on: 06th February, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NDPS ACT Judgment reserved on :11th November, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 06th February, 2012 Crl.M.B.No.193/2011 in CRL.A. 148/2010 VISHAL SHARMA Through
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No.- 833 of 2009 1. Nirmala Devi, wife of Madan Prasad Tiwary 2. Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary, son of Madan Prasad Tiwary 3. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, son of Madan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT BAIL APPLN. 444/2012 Reserved on: 30th March, 2012 Decided on: 10th April, 2012 SUMIT TANDON Through: Mr. Ajay Burman, Advocate....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012 M/S SUNDERLAL JAIN CHARITABLE HOSPITAL... Petitioner Through:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Crl. Rev. P. No.286/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No.286/2009 Reserved on : 09.07.2010 Date of Decision : 12.08.2010 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI).Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, APP. Versus. Through Nemo
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.A No.10232/2008 & Crl. LP No.182/2008 % Date of Decision: 21.10.2010 State Badrul & Ors. Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, APP Versus Through Nemo. Petitioner.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FAO (OS) No.178/2008. Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FAO (OS) No.178/2008 Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008 Judgment pronounced on : 9th January, 2009 Ms. Jyotika Kumar...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2016 (Arising out SLP (Crl.) No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2016 (Arising out SLP (Crl.) No. 7284 of 2016) CHANDRAKESHWAR PRASAD @ CHANDU BABU Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5144 OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5144 OF 2015 BETWEEN: SRI SURENDRA BABU R S/O SRI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: September 28, 2016 Decided on: 10 th January, 2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: September 28, 2016 Decided on: 10 th January, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 1253/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.6591/2016 (Stay) NISHU WADHWA Represented by: versus SIDDHARTH
Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Adv. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT Judgment reserved on: 10.01.2013 Judgment delivered on:17.01.2013 FAO(OS) 576/2009 & CM No.17199/2010 SUBHASH NAYYAR... Appellant
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. 1. Sh. Hari Prakash Sharma (deceased) S/o Late Shri Kehar Singh Sharma, Through Legal Heirs.
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI CM (M) Nos. 1201/2010 & CM No. 16773/2010 % Judgment reserved on: 17 th September, 2010 Judgment delivered on: 09 th November, 2010 1. Sh. Hari Prakash Sharma (deceased)
AGE DETERMINATION UNDER POCSO ACT. Professor S P SRIVASTAVA
AGE DETERMINATION UNDER POCSO ACT Professor S P SRIVASTAVA CHALLGES No registration of birth. Parents give wrong date of birth at the time of admission in school. Often they give different dates of birth
In the Court of Ms. Saloni Singh, Civil Judge 02, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi District, New Delhi.
CS No. /2016 Raj Pal Singh vs. B-XI Resident Welfare Association Fresh case received today by way of assignment from the Court of Ld. Senior Civil Judge/Rent Controller, Patiala House Court, Let the same
AGE DETERMINATION ENQUIRY UNDER JJ ACT. Professor S P SRIVASTAVA
AGE DETERMINATION ENQUIRY UNDER JJ ACT Professor S P SRIVASTAVA BRIJ MOHAN VS PRIYABRAT AIR 1965 SC 282 Section 35 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872 would be attracted if entry is made by the public servant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No of 2015) Versus
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1525 OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 9151 of 2015) Shamsher Singh Verma Appellant Versus State of
Bar & Bench (
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5632 of 2014] NON REPORTABLE State of Madhya Pradesh.. Appellant Versus Kalyan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014 DR. ZUBAIR UL ABIDIN Through: Mr.Suraj Rathi, Adv.... Petitioner versus STATE
1. The appellant was convicted under section 302 of Indian. Penal Code (for short IPC) vide judgment dated
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 17.11.2009 + CRL. A. No.101 of 1995 PRABHU DAYAL Through: Nemo. APPELLANT Versus THE STATE Through:...RESPONDENT Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocate.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY ACT, Crl.L.P. No. 236/2008. Judgment reserved on: December 12,2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Crl.L.P. No. 236/2008 Judgment reserved on: December 12,2008 Judgment delivered on: 02.02. 2009 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD... Through:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS OF State of Tamil Nadu.Appellant.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.423-424 OF 2018 State of Tamil Nadu.Appellant Versus S. Martin Etc.. Respondents J U D G M E N T Uday
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981
81 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 82 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 Rules Contents Page No. 1. Title 83 2. Definition 83
BRIJ MOHAN vs PRIYABRAT AIR 1965Sc 282
BRIJ MOHAN vs PRIYABRAT AIR 1965Sc 282 Section 35 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872 would be attracted if entry is made by the public servant himself in a public or other official book. In actual life false
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Date of Reserve: 7th December, 2010 Date of Order: January 04, 2011 Crl. MC No.435/2009 Narcotics Control Bureau...Petitioner
LL.B. - II Term Paper LB Law of Crimes II The Code of Criminal Procedure
LL.B. - II Term Paper LB 203 - Law of Crimes II The Code of Criminal Procedure The Code of Criminal Procedure provides the machinery for the detection of crime, apprehension of suspected criminals, collection
[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]
![[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]](/thumbs/73/68126486.jpg "[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]")
SNo. Case No. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
CS no. 26/15 M/s Simulax SMT Solutions Vs. M/s Quad. Sh. Dheeraj Bhidhudi counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant.
CS no. 26/15 M/s Simulax SMT Solutions Vs. M/s Quad Sh. Dheeraj Bhidhudi counsel for plaintiff None for defendant. Present case has been transferred to the court of Sh. Sanjay Khanagwal, learned ADJ 07,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA. CRIMINAL PETITION No.7191/2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17 th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7191/2015 BETWEEN: HEMANTH @ HEMANTH SINGH
Ajoy Kumar Ghose vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 18 March, 2009
Supreme Court of India Author: V.S.Sirpurkar Bench: Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar 1 "REPORTABLE" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.485 OF 2009 (Arising
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.403/2003 & CRL.M.A.717/2003
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 17 th November,2009 Judgment Delivered on: 19 th November, 2009 + CRL.REV.P.403/2003 & CRL.M.A.717/2003 STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF
$~J *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + IA 16973/2013 in CC 50/2013 in CS(OS) 626/2012. versus
$~J *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IA 16973/2013 in CC 50/2013 in CS(OS) 626/2012 Date of Reserve: April 07, 2015 Date of Decision:July 31, 2015 JASBIR SINGH LAMBA & ORS... Plaintiffs Through
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Judgment reserved on:07.02.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 10.02.2012 W.P.(C) 734/2012 Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Another Petitioners Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CRL.M.C. 4966/2014 & Crl. M.A /2014. Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 1, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4966/2014 & Crl. M.A. 17011/2014 VIJAY KUMAR WADHAWAN... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Tarun Goomber, Mr. Gaurav
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL PETITION No /2012
1 BETWEEN IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 11291/2012 B P KRISHNEGOWDA, S/O.LATE PUTTASWAMYGOWDA,
The roster of sitting of Hon'ble Judges during Winter Vacation from to shall be as under: NAMES OF THE HON'BLE JUDGES
28.12.2016 1 CAUSE LIST The roster of sitting of Hon'ble Judges during Winter Vacation from 26.12.2016 to 31.12.2016 shall be as under: SL. NO. NAMES OF THE HON'BLE JUDGES COURT NO. PERIOD 1. HON'BLE MS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CRL.M.C. No of Reserved on: May 3, Date of decision: 4th July, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 CRL.M.C. No. 4870-72 of 2006 Reserved on: May 3, 2008 Date of decision: 4th July, 2008 RAKESH SHARMA and ORS. Through:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 826 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 826 of 2010 1. Subhash Agarwal @ Subhash Kumar Agarwal 2. Shankar Agarwal @ Shankar Lal Agarwal Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2015 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.6449 of 2014) vs.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2015 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.6449 of 2014) MANIK TANEJA & ANR.... Appellants vs. STATE OF
Statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr. P.C. r/w Section 281 of Cr. P.C Statement of accused Jasdeep Singh S/o Sh. J. S. Bhatia.
Statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr. P.C. r/w Section 281 of Cr. P.C. FIR No.31/2013 16.03.2016 Statement of accused Jasdeep Singh S/o Sh. J. S. Bhatia. PS Parliament Street U/s 279/337/304A
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4158/2015 Date of Decision : January 08 th, versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4158/2015 Date of Decision : January 08 th, 2016 LOKESH KUMAR & ORS... Petitioner Through Mr.Rameti Singh Maurya, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through...
Judgment reserved on : October 26, 2009 Judgment delivered on : October 30, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : October 26, 2009 Judgment delivered on : October 30, 2009 + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.68/1996 DAYA RAM & ANR. THE STATE Versus Through: Through:...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2184 OF 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5192 of 2014] State of Rajasthan... Appellant Vs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents
Bar & Bench (
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1175 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(Criminal) No. 5440/2017) The State of Orissa Mahimananda Mishra Versus..Appellant..Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL M.C. NO.3015 OF 2012 Decided on : 4th January, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL M.C. NO.3015 OF 2012 Decided on : 4th January, 2013 KRANTA AAKASH @ PRAKASH KUMAR Through: Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 30 th October, 2009 Judgment Delivered on: 06 th November, 2009 + CRL.R.P.985/2002 TIKA RAM versus Through:... Petitioner Mr.Harish Malhotra,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 722 OF 2015 (Arising from S.L.P. (Criminal) No.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 722 OF 2015 (Arising from S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 6684/2013) D. T. Virupakshappa Appellant (s) Versus C. Subash
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012 MS. KRITI KOHLI Through: Mr. Rao Balvir Singh, Advocate... Appellant VERSUS
Criminal Revision No.1 of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT Criminal Revision No.1 of 2016 Advocates for the Petitioner: Mr. S. Borthakur Mr. P. K. Borah Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Judgment delivered on: January 08, 2014 CRL.A. 1452/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Judgment delivered on: January 08, 2014 CRL.A. 1452/2010 PRASHANT JAIN... Appellant Through Mr.Harin Raval, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vineet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Reserved on : Date of decision :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Reserved on : 05.02.2009 Date of decision : 10.02.2009 Crl.M.C. 2296/2008 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. and ORS. Through: Petitioners