Suit No. : 570/15 13/01/2016. Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant.

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Suit No. : 570/15 13/01/2016. Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant."

Transcription

1 Suit No. : 570/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant. Vakalatnama filed by the counsel for the defendant alongwith WS. Copy given. Now put up for replication / documents / admission denial and framing of issues on

2 Suit No. : 332/12 Counsel for the plaintiff. None for the defendant. Arguments heard. Now put up for orders on

3 Ex. No. : 96/10 Counsel for the DH. After some arguments, the counsel for the DH states that she be given some time to move a proper application for condonation of delay. Heard. Allowed. Now put up for further proceedings on

4 RCA No. : 57/13 Counsel for the appellant. Counsel for LR of respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 in person. The counsel for the appellant has moved an application U/s 151 CPC for waving of cost imposed on , and which was imposed because the appellant had not taken steps for the service of respondent No. 2. It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the counsel for the respondent No. 2 was served on and the receipt is already filed on record by him on in the Court. It is submitted by him that since the counsel for the respondent No. 2 was served so he has not taken steps for the service of respondent No. 2. It is further submitted by him that this fact could not be informed either to the Ld predecessor of this court or to this Court due to inadvertence. He seeks the waiver of the 3 costs imposed on these dates. Heard. Perused the records. The record shows that Counsel Sh. BB Sharma was served with the notice of the appeal on and this fact also not denied by the respondent No. 2 that Sh. B.B. Sharma was not his counsel. In view of this the above mentioned 3 costs imposed on the appellant are waived. Further cost of Rs. 6500/- paid. The appellant has also moved an application U/s 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 2 days in filing the application U/o Contd...

5 --2-- XXII Rule 3 CPC. Copy given. Respondent No. 2 submits that he has no objection if the application U/s 5 of the Limitation Act and application U/o 22 Rule 3 CPC are allowed. However, it is submitted by the counsel for the respondent No. 1 that no document has been placed on record in regard to the death of the deceased appellant, however, he has no objection if the applications U/s 5 of the Limitation Act and application U/o 22 Rule 3 CPC are allowed. In view of this, the application U/s 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed and the delay is condoned and application U/o XXII Rule 3 CPC is also allowed. The LRs of deceased appellant are taken on record. Now put up for filing of amended memo of parties on the next date of hearing and also for disposal of the appeal on

6 Suit No. : 48A/2014 Counsel for the parties. PW 2 Sunil Kumar Arora cross examined and discharged. Now put up for remaining PE on

7 Suit No. : 378/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant Raj Pal in person. Reply to the application U/s 151 CPC moved by the plaintiff not filed. It is submitted by defendant Raj Pal that he has not received the copy of the application U/s 151 CPC but this averment of his is not believable looking into the previous order sheet. However, in the interest of justice, last opportunity is granted to file the reply to the application U/s 151 CPC subject to cost of Rs. 2500/-. Now put up for filing of reply to the application U/s 151 CPC by the defendant on

8 Suit No. : 379/15 Plaintiff in person. Counsel for the defendant. Put up with the connected case on

9 Ex. No. : 216/10 Ashok Arora Vs. Naresh Kumar DH in person. File taken up today on an application U/s 151 CPC for ratification of order for the publication of proclamation of the sale in the Statesman instead of the New paper The Hindustan Times moved by the defendant. Heard. Perused the application. In the facts and circumstances as mentioned in the application, the application is allowed and the DH is directed to get the publication of proclamation of the sale published in the news paper Statesman instead of Hindustan Times. The application is disposed off accordingly. Put up on the date already fixed i.e Copy of order be given dasti as prayed.

10 CS No. 378/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant not served. Be served again on filing of PF and RC as also through affixation for Steps to be taken within three days. Put up for service of defendant on

11 CS No. 417/15 Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff. Memo of Appearance filed on behalf of the defendants. Put up for Vakalatnama and for filing of WS on

12 CS No. 621/15 Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant not served. Be served again on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days. Put up for service of defendant on

13 Suit No. 620/15 Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant not served. Be served again on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days. Put up for service of defendant on

14 CS No. 394/15 Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant not served. Be served again on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days. Put up for service of defendant on

15 CS No. 376/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. As per the report, defendant Amar Pal has expired. Counsel seeks time to file an application for substitution of his LRs. Put up for further proceedings on

16 RCA No. 18/15 Proxy Counsel for the appellant. Proxy Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Steps for service of defendant no. 3 not taken. Respondent no. 3 be served again on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days.

17 Suit No. 156/13 Plaintiff in person alongwith Sh. Chittranjan, Adv. Sh. R.S. Gautam, proxy counsel for the defendant. He seeks time for filing the Vakalatnama and a seeks adjournment. In my opinion this is no ground for adjournment. On the last date of hearing, fresh Vakalatnama was filed and the counsel who had filed the Vakalatnama, took time to crossexamine the witness, and the matter was adjourned, subject to costs of Rs. 15,000/-, which is also not paid. And, today also a new counsel has come, who is even seeking time for filing the WS, which shows the casual manner, in which the defendant is taking the court proceedings. In view of the same, right to further cross-examination of PW-1 is closed. Vide separate statement of the plaintiff, PE closed. Put up for DE on List of witnesses to be filed within ten days. Defendant is directed to supply the advance copy of evidence by way of affidavit to the counsel for the plaintiff, seven days prior to the date of hearing.

18 CS No. 126/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Proxy Counsel Sh. Falit Kaushik, for the defendant. He has placed on record the medical certificate of witness Dr. Sudhir C. Joseph. Perused the medical certificate. Witness is exempted from appearance for today only. Affidavit of this witness has already been supplied to the counsel for the plaintiff. Put up for DE on

19 Suit No. 163/15 Counsels for the parties. heard. Arguments on the applications under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Put up for Orders on

20 Suit No. 482/15 Plaintiff in person alongwith proxy counsel Sh. Nishant Bhadoriya, Adv. Counsel for the defendant nos. 1 to 3. Counsel for the defendant nos. 9 to 14. Counsel for the defendant no. 15. Ahlamad has produced a parcha yadasht, as file is not traceable. It is submitted by the counsel for he defendant no. 15 that plaintiff was supposed to supply the plaint and other documents, which has not been done by the plaintiff. Plaintiff is directed to supply the same, within three days. Defendant nos. 1 to 3 has filed their original documents alongwith list. Defendant nos. 1 to 3 also filed an application under Section 151 CPC. Copy given. WS filed on behalf of defendant nos. 9 to 14. Copy given. Put up for filing of WS on behalf of defendant no. 15, and reply to the WS of defendant nos. 9 to 14, and reply to the application under Section 151 CPC, for

21 CS No. 181/14 Counsels for the parties. Cost of Rs.20,000/- paid. Defendant has moved an application under Section 151 CPC, for recalling of order dated , by virtue of which the DE was closed. The application is accompanied by the copy of the order of the Hon'ble High Court, which shows the presence of the Counsel in court no. 10. Application is also accompanied by the text of the conversation, done on SMS, between main counsel and the proxy counsel. Copy given. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not want to file any reply, and has no objection, if the application is allowed, and only one opportunity is granted to the defendant, to lead entire DE. In view of the no objection accorded by the counsel for the plaintiff, the application under Section 151 CPC is allowed. Defendant is granted one opportunity to lead entire DE. Put up for DE on List of witnesses to be filed within ten days. Defendant is directed to supply the advance copy of evidence by way of affidavit to the counsel for the plaintiff, seven days prior to the date of hearing.

22 Suit No. 241/13 Counsels for the parties. No PW is present. Counsel for the plaintiff has moved an application under order 7 Rule 14(3) alongwith certain documents. Copy given. Put up for reply and arguments on the above said application on Cost be also paid on the next date of hearing.

23 CS No. 352/15 Counsels for the parties. Counsel for the defendant has moved an application under Section 151 CPC. Copy given. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file the reply. Put up for disposal of the above said application on

24 CS No. 250/09 Parties in person. Counsel for the defendant. LC Sh. Sartaj Ali, Advocate is present. He has made the clarifications. Parties seek some more time to work out the modalities. In view of this, put up for further proceedings on

25 CS No. 219/15 Proxy Counsel Sh. G.P. Pant for Sh. Rohit Kumar, Adv, for the plaintiff. Proxy counsel for the defendant. It is submitted by the proxy counsel for the plaintiff that the main counsel is suffering from joint pain in his knees, so, he is unable to come to the court today. He seeks adjournment. In the interests of justice, granted. Put up for final arguments on

26 Suit No. 222/15 Proxy Counsel Sh. G.P. Pant for Sh. Rohit Kumar, Adv, for the plaintiff. Proxy counsel for the defendant. Put up with the connected case on

27 Suit No. 164/14 Counsels for the parties. Plaintiff no. 2 in person. Defendant no. 2 in person. An application for setting aside the ex-parte order dated , moved on behalf of the defendant no. 1. It is urged by the counsel for the defendant no. 1 that the defendant no. 1 has not been keeping well, and he has placed on record his medical certificate alongwith the application. It is further submitted by him that the defendant no. 1 is still getting treatment in Sucheta Kriplani Hospital,as he is paralytic. But, no document with regard to his paralysis, has been filed on record. On the other hand, it is urged by the counsel for the plaintiff that the defendant has been appearing in the court alongwith counsel. It is further urged by the counsel for the plaintiff that the defendant was proceeded ex-parte on , and thereafter he appeared in the court on and alongwith proxy counsel and then again on , when the ex-parte evidence was led. It was only on , that the present application under disposal has been moved. It is nothing but just a delay tactics. It is further submitted by him that he has no objection if the application is allowed, but subject to cost. Heard. Perused the application. In view of the no objection accorded by the counsel for the plaintiff, the application is allowed, the exparte order dated is set aside, subject to cost of Rs.4,000/-. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 has also moved an application for setting aside the ex-parte order dated It is urged by the counsel for the plaintiff that he has no objection if the application is allowed, but subject to heavy cost. Heard. Perused the application. In view of the no objection

28 accorded by the counsel for the plaintiff, the application is allowed, the exparte order dated is set aside, subject to cost of Rs.4,000/-. WS filed on behalf of defendant no. 1. Copy given. Put up for replication, documents, admission denial and framing of issues on

29 RCA No. 11/14 Parties in person alongwith Counsel. Counsels for the parties submits that there are chances of settlement, as parties are ready to settle the matter. In view of this, put up for further proceedings on

30 Suit No. 124/13 Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file fresh application for restoration of the suit. Heard. Allowed. Put up for further proceedings on

31 Suit No. 396/15 Plaintiff in person alongwith counsel. Counsel for the defendant. It is pointed out by the counsels that on , it has been mentioned in the order that it was submitted by the counsel for the defendant that as per the report of the SDM, the old record has been weeded out, rather it was submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff, and not for the defendant. So, this correction is accordingly made in the last order, and the 'counsel for the defendant' be read as 'counsel for the plaintiff'. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file the secondary evidence in respect of the GPA. Put up for PE on

32 Suit No. 160/15 Counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant. Cross-examination of PW-1 recorded partly. Further crossexamination is deferred at the request of the counsel for the defendant. Put up for RPE on The date is given at the request of the plaintiff.

33 Suit No. 267A/15 Son of the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant Vinod Kumar in person. An application under Order 18 rule 2 and 17 r/w Section 151 CPC, filed on behalf of the defendant no. 7. Copy given. Put up for reply and arguments on

34 Suit No. 565/15 Counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Mudit Rastogi, AR of the defendant. Copy given. Reply to the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act filed. Put up for arguments on

35 Suit No. 566/15 Counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Mudit Rastogi, AR of the defendant. Copy given. Reply to the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act filed. Put up for arguments on

36 CS No. 203/15 HDFC BANK VS. RAHUL KUMAR File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Issue notice of the petition to the respondent on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days.

37 Suit No. HDFC BANK LTD VS. CHAMAN BANSAL File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Issue notice of the petition to the respondent on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days.

38 CS No. HDFC BANK LTD. VS. KAMAL SHARMA File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Issue notice of the petition to the respondent on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days.

39 Suit No. HDFC BANK LTD VS. NITIN SHARMA File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Issue notice of the petition to the respondent on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days.

40 Suit No. TEXMACO INFRASTRUCTURE VS. VINEET BHALLA File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant in person alongwith counsel Put up for admission denial, documents and framing of issues on

41 Suit No. TEXMACO INFRASTRUCTURE VS. ANKIT SHARMA File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant in person alongwith counsel Put up for admission denial, documents and framing of issues on

42 Suit No. TEXMACO INFRASTRUCTURE VS. JAI KISHORE File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant in person alongwith counsel Put up for admission denial, documents and framing of issues on

43 Suit No. TEXMACO INFRASTRUCTURE VS. NITIN KUMAR File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant in person alongwith counsel Put up for admission denial, documents and framing of issues on

44 Suit No. 206/15 HDFC BANK VS. PINKY SINGH File received by way of transfer from the court of Sh. Vinod Kumar, ADJ-13 (Central), THC, Delhi vide order No. 1948/ /F.3. (4)/adj/gaz/15 Dated 17 Oct of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, (HQ), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Counsel for the applicant/petitioner. It is stated by the counsel for the applicant/petitioner that he wants to withdraw the present petition. His statement to this effect recorded on a separate sheet. In view of the statement of the counsel for the applicant/petitioner, the petition under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to record room.

45 Suit No. ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr. Mahabir Prasad Dubey registered. Fresh case received on assignment. It be checked and Present: Sh. N. Balaraman, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application under Order XL Rule 1 r/w Section 151 CPC for seeking appointment of Ex-parte receiver. It is averred in the application that the plaintiff bank advanced a loan of Rs. 11,42,606/- to the defendant for purchasing a vehicle make EICHER bearing registration no. DL1GC1260. The said loan was to be repaid in 35 equated monthly installments of Rs.39,262/-, out of which respondent has paid 25 installments and has committed default of 4 installments. In these circumstances, he prays for the appointment of Ex-parte Receiver. The notice of this petition has been served through RC for , but despite notice, the defendant has failed to make the payment of the termination amount, as demanded by the plaintiff bank in notice. I have heard Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff and perused the application as well as document placed on record. Perusal of the above shows that plaintiff advanced a loan of Rs.11,42,606/-, to the defendant for purchasing a vehicle bearing registration no. DL1GC1260. The said loan was to be repaid by the defendant in 35 equated monthly installments. However, defendant has paid 25 installments out of 35 installments and has committed default of 4 installments, till filing of the suit. The vehicle in question was hypothecated by the defendant and is the only security for repayment of loan. If the defendant succeeds in creating third party interest in respect to the vehicle in question, which is hypothecated by him, then the plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, moreover, he has failed to adhere the financial discipline of repayment of loan.

46 The above facts thus clearly shows that plaintiff has a primafacie case for seeking appointment of an Ex-parte receiver to repossess the vehicle in question from the defendant. The balance of convenience also lies in favour of plaintiff. Accordingly, request made by the plaintiff for appointment of Ex-parte Receiver is accepted. Mr. Akshat Saxena/Rajesh Singh, Representative of the plaintiff bank, is hereby appointed as receiver with the direction to repossess the vehicle make EICHER bearing registration no. DL1GC1260. After repossessing the vehicle from defendant, receiver shall prepare the inventories of the vehicle in question and shall keep the said vehicle in his safe custody till further order. The receiver is also directed to file the status report before the next date. Put up for service of defendant on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days. Order be given dasti, as prayed. ADJ;DELHI

47 Suit No. ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr. Rakesh Kumar registered. Fresh case received on assignment. It be checked and Present: Sh. N. Balaraman, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application under Order XL Rule 1 r/w Section 151 CPC for seeking appointment of Ex-parte receiver. It is averred in the application that the plaintiff bank advanced a loan of Rs. 3,95,920/- to the defendant for purchasing a vehicle make TATA ACE bearing registration no. DL1LT3788. The said loan was to be repaid in 48 equated monthly installments of Rs.11224/-, out of which respondent has paid 19 installments and has committed default of 3 installments. In these circumstances, he prays for the appointment of Ex-parte Receiver. The notice of this petition has been served through RC for , but despite notice, the defendant has failed to make the payment of the termination amount, as demanded by the plaintiff bank in notice. I have heard Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff and perused the application as well as document placed on record. Perusal of the above shows that plaintiff advanced a loan of Rs.11,42,606/-, to the defendant for purchasing a vehicle bearing registration no. DL1GC1260. The said loan was to be repaid by the defendant in 35 equated monthly installments. However, defendant has paid 25 installments out of 35 installments and has committed default of 4 installments, till filing of the suit. The vehicle in question was hypothecated by the defendant and is the only security for repayment of loan. If the defendant succeeds in creating third party interest in respect to the vehicle in question, which is hypothecated by him, then the plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, moreover, he has failed to adhere the financial discipline of repayment of loan.

48 The above facts thus clearly shows that plaintiff has a primafacie case for seeking appointment of an Ex-parte receiver to repossess the vehicle in question from the defendant. The balance of convenience also lies in favour of plaintiff. Accordingly, request made by the plaintiff for appointment of Ex-parte Receiver is accepted. Mr. Akshat Saxena/Rajesh Singh, Representative of the plaintiff bank, is hereby appointed as receiver with the direction to repossess the vehicle make EICHER bearing registration no. DL1GC1260. After repossessing the vehicle from defendant, receiver shall prepare the inventories of the vehicle in question and shall keep the said vehicle in his safe custody till further order. The receiver is also directed to file the status report before the next date. Put up for service of defendant on filing of PF and RC for Steps to be taken within three days. Order be given dasti, as prayed. ADJ;DELHI

49 Suit No. Brij Mohan Gote Wala & Anr. Vs. Sh.Padam Chand Vaish & Anr. Counsels for the parties. Part arguments heard. Put up for further arguments on Interim order to be continued. Copy of the order be given dasti.

50 CS No. 396/15 M/s Alankit Assignments Ltd. Vs. Ms. Shubhita Aggarwal & Anr. Counsel for the petitioner. He has moved an application under Section 151 CPC alongwith certain documents. Issue notice of this application to the respondents on filing of PF for the date fixed, i.e Till then, operation of the impugned award dated be stayed. Copy of the order be given dasti, as prayed.

51 Ex. No. 66/12 None. No time left for orders as arguments were heard in a case titled as Brij Mohan Gote Wala & Anr. Vs. Sh.Padam Chand Vaish & Anr, till 4.00 P.M. Put up for Orders on

52 Suit No. 158/15 Ms. Promila & Anr. Vs. Smt. Lal Kumari Devi & Anr. None. Vide separate Judgment dictated and announced in the open court today, the suit filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants, is decreed with cost. Decree sheet be accordingly prepared. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.

53

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman. Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person. Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman. Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person. Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD been settled. It is submitted by both the parties that the matter has On

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.... Appellant Versus ICICI BANK LTD... Respondent

More information

CS no. 26/15 M/s Simulax SMT Solutions Vs. M/s Quad. Sh. Dheeraj Bhidhudi counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant.

CS no. 26/15 M/s Simulax SMT Solutions Vs. M/s Quad. Sh. Dheeraj Bhidhudi counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant. CS no. 26/15 M/s Simulax SMT Solutions Vs. M/s Quad Sh. Dheeraj Bhidhudi counsel for plaintiff None for defendant. Present case has been transferred to the court of Sh. Sanjay Khanagwal, learned ADJ 07,

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos.15238-40/2010 RAJ KUMAR BARI & ORS...Appellant through Mr. S.D. Singh & Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. versus SHIV RANI & ORS...Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. MAC App. No. 453 of Judgment reserved on:25th November, Judgment delivered on: 2nd December, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. MAC App. No. 453 of Judgment reserved on:25th November, Judgment delivered on: 2nd December, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1. Smt. Rani W/o Late Shri Jai Kumar Mittal SUBJECT : Motor Vehicle Act,1988 MAC App. No. 453 of 2008 Judgment reserved on:25th November, 2008 Judgment delivered

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Dated of Reserve: July 21, Date of Order : September 05, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Dated of Reserve: July 21, Date of Order : September 05, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Dated of Reserve: July 21, 2008 Date of Order : September 05, 2008 CM(M) No.819/2007 Rajiv Sud...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS.17117 & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Sri

More information

[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]

[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)] SNo. Case No. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007 Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy(Dead) through LRs..Appellant(s) VERSUS Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao &

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment reserved on: 15.03.2011 Judgment delivered on: 18.03.2011 RSA No.243/2006 & CM No.10268/2006 SHRI.D.V. SINGH & ANR...Appellants

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012 MS. KRITI KOHLI Through: Mr. Rao Balvir Singh, Advocate... Appellant VERSUS

More information

EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS FEW POINTS ON LIMITATION TO REMEMBER. Auction Purchase under Order 21 rule 95 CPC

EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS FEW POINTS ON LIMITATION TO REMEMBER. Auction Purchase under Order 21 rule 95 CPC EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS FEW POINTS ON LIMITATION TO REMEMBER For delivery of possession by Court Auction Purchase under Order 21 rule 95 CPC For enforcement of a decree granting Mandatory Injunction under

More information

Through : Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates.

Through : Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY RESERVED ON : 27th NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON : 11th DECEMBER, 2014 CS (OS) 1980/2011 & CC No.21/2012 SHIV SHAKTI MADAN... Plaintiff Through

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 10.3.2011 RSA No.46/2011 VIRENDER KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate...Appellants Versus JASWANT RAI

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998. Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998. Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998 Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009 SURINDER KAUR Through: Petitioner Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate. versus SARDAR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014) versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014) versus IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 13361 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 29621 of 2014) Rakesh Mohindra Anita Beri and others versus Appellant (s)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.595/2003 Reserved on: 4th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 13th January, 2012 SHRI VIRENDER SINGH Through: Mr. R.C. Chopra,

More information

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE COMMISIONER OF INDUSTRIES 419, UDYOGSADAN, FIE, PATPARGANJ,DELHI -92

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE COMMISIONER OF INDUSTRIES 419, UDYOGSADAN, FIE, PATPARGANJ,DELHI -92 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI OFFICE OF THE COMMISIONER OF INDUSTRIES 419, UDYOGSADAN, FIE, PATPARGANJ,DELHI -92 No. DCI/ILMAC/CI/2011/ I-t ~ 7- 'L - J'D. Dated: 81 ft I J Minutes of the meetina of the Industrial

More information

Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM.

Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on at 02:00 PM. FIR No.1443/15 PS Tilak Nagar Fresh charge sheet filed. It be checked and registered. : Ld. APP for the State. Put up for consideration on 08.07.2016 at 02:00 PM. West/THC : FIR No.235/13 PS Paschim Vihar

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Judgment: R.S.A.No. 90/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Judgment: R.S.A.No. 90/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Date of Judgment: 28.04.2011 R.S.A.No. 90/2007 SH. NARAIN SINGH & ORS...Appellants Through: Ms. Sukhda Dhamiza, Advocate along with

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) No.2037/1992 & CM No.3935/1992 (for interim relief). Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) No.2037/1992 & CM No.3935/1992 (for interim relief). Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20 th September, 2010. + W.P.(C) No.2037/1992 & CM No.3935/1992 (for interim relief). % SH. SATISH CHAND KAPOOR (DECEASED) THROUGH LR s Through:...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES), 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED: THIS THE 27 th DAY OF JUNE, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 38220-221/2010 (GM-RES), BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION No.

More information

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1738/2013 Judgment reserved on 10 th September, 2015 Judgment delivered on 23 rd September, 2015 HARISH CHAND TANDON Through:... Plaintiff Ms. Shalini

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA 689/1998 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 16, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA 689/1998 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 16, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA 689/1998 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 16, 2012 NAR SINGH DASS GUPTA... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashwini Mata, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Reserved on: 5th August, Date of decision: 19th September, 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Reserved on: 5th August, Date of decision: 19th September, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Reserved on: 5th August, 2011 Date of decision: 19th September, 2011 FAO(OS) 502/2009 LT. COL S.D. SURIE Through: -versus-..appellant

More information

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : 21 st August, 2015 CM(M) 208/2015

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : 21 st August, 2015 CM(M) 208/2015 $~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 21 st August, 2015 CM(M) 208/2015 SONIA MEHRA versus... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Kalra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kalra, Adv. MANISHA

More information

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP No.552/2006 % Date of decision : 06.07.2009 Sh. Surender Pal Singh Through:. Petitioner Mr. Amit Bansal & Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocates for petitioner. Versus

More information

CHAPTER 16. Legal Practitioners. Part A THE FILING OF POWERS OF ATTORNEY BY PLEADERS IN SUBORDINATE COURTS

CHAPTER 16. Legal Practitioners. Part A THE FILING OF POWERS OF ATTORNEY BY PLEADERS IN SUBORDINATE COURTS Ch. 16 Part A] CHAPTER 16 Legal Practitioners Part A THE FILING OF POWERS OF ATTORNEY BY PLEADERS IN SUBORDINATE COURTS 1. Pleadings and acting by pleaders Whereas by Order III, Rule 4, of the Code of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2722/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2722/2009 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BETWEEN: BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2722/2009 M/S.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE

More information

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 [Arising out of Order dated 25 th July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. SALONI MAHAJAN Through: Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

REGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate.

REGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No. 120 of 2010 % Date of Reserve: July 29, 2010 Date of Order: 12 th August, 2010 12.08.2010 MOHAN LAL JATIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Sud,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) M.F.A. No. 51 of 2014

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) M.F.A. No. 51 of 2014 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) M.F.A. No. 51 of 2014 1. M/S Jain and Associates registered Office at 9, Old Court, House Street, Kolkata- 700001.

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 61 days in refiling

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 61 days in refiling * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2711/2015 % 28 th October, 2015 SH. DEEPAK AGGARWAL Through:... Plaintiff Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. versus SH. RAJ GOYAL AND ORS. Through:... Defendants

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012 IA No.10795/2011 in CS(OS) 514/2010 STOKELY VAN CAMP INC & ANR... Plaintiff Through Ms.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Crl. M.C.No. 4264/2011 & Crl.M.A /2011 (stay)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Crl. M.C.No. 4264/2011 & Crl.M.A /2011 (stay) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Crl. M.C.No. 4264/2011 & Crl.M.A. 19640/2011 (stay) Decided on: 22nd February, 2012 SHORELINE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LTD.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION CM No. 15134 of 2005 in W.P. (C) No. 1043 of 1987 Orders reserved on : 26th July, 2006 Date of Decision : 7th August, 2006 LATE BAWA HARBANS

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Judgment: Ex. F. A. No.18/2010 & CM No /2010 YOGENDER KUMAR & ANOTHER.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Judgment: Ex. F. A. No.18/2010 & CM No /2010 YOGENDER KUMAR & ANOTHER. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 05.07.2011 Ex. F. A. No.18/2010 & CM No. 18758/2010 YOGENDER KUMAR & ANOTHER...Appellants Through: Mr.Ved Prakash

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January, IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January, 2014 SURESH BALA & ORS Through: Mr. B.S.Mann, Advocate....Appellants VERSUS

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Decided on: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Decided on: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on: 23.05.2017 + CS(COMM) 89/2017 and IA Nos. 13470/2014 & 21815/2014 LOUIS VUITTON Through:... Plaintiff Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 OMP No.356/2004 Date of decision : 30th November, 2007 AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS (INDIA) LTD. Through : PETITIONER Mr.

More information

- versus - 1. The following reliefs have been claimed in this

- versus - 1. The following reliefs have been claimed in this THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment Reserved on: 01.03.2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 18.03.2011 I.A. No. 14803/2010 in CS(OS) No. 1943/1998 Sita Kashyap & Anothers..

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % 1 st October, MRS. VANEETA KHANNA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % 1 st October, MRS. VANEETA KHANNA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.1200/2006 % 1 st October, 2015 MRS. VANEETA KHANNA AND ANR.... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate. Versus MR. RAJIV GUPTA AND ORS. Through:...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010 Decided on: 9th August, 2011. DEEPAK GARG Through: Mr. Vijay Agarwal, Advocate.... Petitioner versus

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 12 th December, 2017 J U D G M E N T

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 12 th December, 2017 J U D G M E N T $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1028/2015 ATS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kapil Kher, Advocate with Ms. Harsha, Advocate. versus PLATONIC MARKETING & ANR Through:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma with Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advocates

Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma with Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advocates IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. 1096/2011 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 2903-2904/2012, 2906-2907/2012 Date of Decision: 29th November, 2012 JASBIR KAUR & ORS.... Petitioners

More information

+ I.A. No.5733/2010 & CS (OS) 1356/1999. Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Advocate. versus

+ I.A. No.5733/2010 & CS (OS) 1356/1999. Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Advocate. versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No.5733/2010 & CS (OS) 1356/1999 Date of Reserve : 05.08.2010 Date of decision: 25.10.2010 SMT. SUDESH MADHOK Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Advocate.... Plaintiff

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Pronounced on: 16th October, 2014 CS (OS) NO. 1804/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Pronounced on: 16th October, 2014 CS (OS) NO. 1804/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Pronounced on: 16th October, 2014 CS (OS) NO. 1804/2012 MRS. VEENA SETH Through: Ms. Kamlesh Mahajan, Advocate... Plaintiff Versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JUNE 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1348 OF

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on:

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on: THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on: 10.10.2013 OMP 234/2013 NSSL LIMITED...PETITIONER Vs HPCL-MITTAL ENERGY LIMITED & ANR....RESPONDENTS

More information

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal

More information

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2008 The Saraswat Co-operative Bank Limited (Formerly Maratha Mandir Co-operative Bank Limited)

More information

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Judgment Reserved on: 24th February, 2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 28th February, 2011 CS(OS) No. 2305/2010 SUSHMA SURI & ANR... Plaintiffs

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 HINDUSTAN INSECTICIEDES LTD.... Appellant Through Mr.

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 234/2015

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 234/2015 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Shri Manik Chakraborty S/o late Bijoy Chakravorty R/o Rangapara Town, Ward No. 4, P.O. Rangapara,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 16850 OF 2017 (@ S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.21033/2017) REPORTABLE Himangni Enterprises.Appellant(s) VERSUS Kamaljeet Singh

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT, 1987 FAO No. 332/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 16th January, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT, 1987 FAO No. 332/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 16th January, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT, 1987 FAO No. 332/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 16th January, 2014 RAJ KUMARI DEVI & ORS. Through: Mr. Rajnish K. Jha, Advocate....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on: 11.03.2011 RAJEEV KUMAR MISHRA...Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr Piyush

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 221/2017 & I.A.A 12707/2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 221/2017 & I.A.A 12707/2015 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 221/2017 & I.A.A 12707/2015 EKO INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sumit Roy, Advocate versus MR. SUSHIL KUMAR YADAV Through

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: 28.4.2011 RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD..Appellant Through: Mr.P.K.Seth,

More information

KING POINT ENTERPRISES CO LTD Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate.

KING POINT ENTERPRISES CO LTD Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR INJUNCTION I.A Nos. 9341/2011 (O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC) & 10119/2012( O.39 R.4 CPC) IN CS(OS) 1409/2011 Reserved on: 12th September, 2013 Decided on:

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Arbitration Petition No. 21 of 2017 KLA Const. Technologies Private Limited..Petitioner Versus Kajima India Private Limited Respondent Present:- Dr. Amit George,

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on : April 25, 2014 + IA No. 5745/2013 (u/o 39 R 1 & 2 CPC) in CS(OS) 660/2013 WOCKHARDT LTD. Through... Plaintiff Mr.Ajay Sahni, Ms. Kanika Bajaj and

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT, 1956 CRL.M.C. No. 179/2010 Judgment delivered on: 20th December, 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT, 1956 CRL.M.C. No. 179/2010 Judgment delivered on: 20th December, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT, 1956 CRL.M.C. No. 179/2010 Judgment delivered on: 20th December, 2011 MOHAN LAL & ANR.... Petitioner Through : Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with

More information

% L.A. APPEAL NO. 738 OF Date of Decision: 13 th October, # UNION OF INDIA...Appellant! Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate

% L.A. APPEAL NO. 738 OF Date of Decision: 13 th October, # UNION OF INDIA...Appellant! Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % L.A. APPEAL NO. 738 OF 2008 + Date of Decision: 13 th October, 2009 # UNION OF INDIA...Appellant! Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate Versus $ SHAUKAT RAI (D)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014 DR. ZUBAIR UL ABIDIN Through: Mr.Suraj Rathi, Adv.... Petitioner versus STATE

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) No.101 to 105 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi in CP Nos. 16/152/2015,

More information

FINAL ORDER NO /2014 APPEAL NO. E/58979 OF 2013 SEPTEMBER 3, 2014

FINAL ORDER NO /2014 APPEAL NO. E/58979 OF 2013 SEPTEMBER 3, 2014 Cenvat Credit : If sales are on FOR basis, with risk being borne by manufacturer till delivery to customer and composite value of sales includes value of freight involved in delivery at customer's premises,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS. C.R.P. (NPD) No. 574 of Decided On:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS. C.R.P. (NPD) No. 574 of Decided On: MANU/TN/3588/2011 Equivalent Citation: 2011(6)CTC11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS C.R.P. (NPD) No. 574 of 2011 Decided On: 26.08.2011 Appellants: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Sivakama Sundari

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.815/2007 % Date of decision: 16 th February, 2010 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.N. Kaura with Ms. Paramjit Benipal

More information

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha,

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha, TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI DATED 18 th JULY, 2011 Petition No. 275 (C) of 2009 Reliance Communications Limited.. Petitioner Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited..... Respondent

More information

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Pallab Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nava Kumar Kalita, learned Additional Public

More information

CRP No. 429 of The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its Director Mrs. Nazrana A. Islam.

CRP No. 429 of The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its Director Mrs. Nazrana A. Islam. THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) CRP No. 429 of 2008 The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Date of Reserve: 7th December, 2010 Date of Order: January 04, 2011 Crl. MC No.435/2009 Narcotics Control Bureau...Petitioner

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus: 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.

More information

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, (1) These rules may be called the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, (1) These rules may be called the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993. DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, 1993 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections(1) and (2) of section 36 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institution Ordinance, 1993

More information

Through :Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Ms. Abhiruchi Arora, Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Jaishree Shukla, Advs.

Through :Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Ms. Abhiruchi Arora, Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Jaishree Shukla, Advs. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No. 16809/2010 (u/o 7 R 10 & 11 r/w Sec. 151 CPC) in CS(OS) No. 1830/2010 IA No. 16756/2010 (u/o 7 R 10 & 11 r/w Sec. 151 CPC)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Date of decision: 24.05.2011 WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.7523/2011 YUDHVIR SINGH Versus Through: PETITIONER Mr.N.S.Dalal,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR BETWEEN W.P. NO.466 OF 2012 (GM-CPC) SRI ANANTHAIAH S/O CHIKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 55

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. JAI SHREE LALLA Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE 1 FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE Against three mortgages of agricultural lands situated in villages Pal and Bhatha admeasuring

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR. WRIT PETITION Nos OF 2015 (GM-CPC)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR. WRIT PETITION Nos OF 2015 (GM-CPC) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR WRIT PETITION Nos.460-462 OF 2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.B.R.NAGALAKSHMI

More information

versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R IA No of 2011 (by Defendant u/o VII R. 10 & 11 CPC)

versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R IA No of 2011 (by Defendant u/o VII R. 10 & 11 CPC) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 1188 of 2011 & IAs 7950 of 2011 (u/o 39 R. 1 & 2 CPC), 3388 of 2013 (u/o XXVI R. 2 CPC) & 18427 of 2013 (by Plaintiff u/o VII R. 14 CPC) LT FOODS LIMITED...

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Order delivered on: 2 nd September, I.A. No.17351/2015 in CS (OS) 2501/2015.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Order delivered on: 2 nd September, I.A. No.17351/2015 in CS (OS) 2501/2015. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: 2 nd September, 2015 + I.A. No.17351/2015 in CS (OS) 2501/2015 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)... Plaintiff Through Mr. C.S.Vaidyanathan,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, DATE OF Decision : 18th January, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, DATE OF Decision : 18th January, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No. 40/2012 DATE OF Decision : 18th January, 2012 M/S SEWA INTERNATIONAL FASHIONS & ORS... Appellants Through : Md. Rashid,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER : 13.03.2013 IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED & ANR....Petitioners Through: Mr. Maninder

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972. BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009 Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 16th January,2012 SUDESH KUMAR

More information

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 222 of 2014 Forward Foundation & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. CORAM : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK Order Reserved on: Date of Decision: January 29, 2007 CS(OS)No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK Order Reserved on: Date of Decision: January 29, 2007 CS(OS)No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK Order Reserved on: 09.01.2007 Date of Decision: January 29, 2007 CS(OS)No.2749 OF 2000 Prestige Housewares Ltd. & Anr.... Plaintiffs Through:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7230 of 2008 and CM No.13974 of 2008 Decided on: October 03, 2008 1. The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs

More information

2. The effect of a judgment passed in a criminal proceeding on a pending civil proceeding is the question involved herein.

2. The effect of a judgment passed in a criminal proceeding on a pending civil proceeding is the question involved herein. Supreme Court of India Vishnu Dutt Sharma vs Daya Sapra on 5 May, 2009 Author: S Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha, Mukundakam Sharma REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA (OS) No. 20/2002. Reserved on : 31st July, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA (OS) No. 20/2002. Reserved on : 31st July, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA (OS) No. 20/2002 Reserved on : 31st July, 2008 Decided on : 8th August, 2008 MANSOOR MUMTAZ and ORS. Through : Mr. S.D. Ansari,

More information

26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 22 nd August, 2017 J U D G M E N T

26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 22 nd August, 2017 J U D G M E N T 26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 383/2017 UNION OF INDIA... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Mr. Anshuamn Upadhyay, Ms.

More information

Corrected IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF State of Himachal Pradesh and others.

Corrected IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF State of Himachal Pradesh and others. Corrected IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6015 OF 2009 State of Himachal Pradesh and others Appellant(s) versus Ashwani Kumar and others Respondent(s)

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT 1956 Judgment delivered on: 03.01.2013 WP(C) 668/2012 AND CM No.27/2013 (for directions) & CM No.9851/2012 (for directions) M/S. KLEN & MARSHALLS

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA. CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA. CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA BETWEEN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1020/2013 SIDDANAGOUDA S/O VENKANAGOUDA

More information