ORDINANCE NO a 0 6

Transcription

1 ORDINANCE NO a 0 6 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION RELATIVE TO THE RESTORATION, RENOVATION OR REHABILITATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNED BY MICHAEL M. EISENFELD AND BETH L. EISENFELD, LOCATED AT 813 SOUTH PACKWOOD AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, IN THE HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT, BASED UPON CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tampa is authorized, pursuant to the terms contained in Sections and , Florida Statutes, to adopt an ordinance allowing ad valorem tax exemptions under s.3, Art. VII of the State Constitution to historic properties if the owners are engaging in the restoration, rehabilitation, or renovation of such properties in accordance with guidelines established therein; WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority contained in Ordinance No , passed and ordained by the City Council of the City of Tampa, Florida, on September 9, 1993, an historic preservation property (ad valorem) tax exemption was created for improvements to historic properties completed in accordance with approved guidelines ("The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance"); WHEREAS, Michael M. Eisenfeld and Beth L. Eisenfeld made certain improvements to the property owned and located at 813 South Packwood Avenue, Tampa, Florida, and filed an Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application with the Architectural Review Commission for approval by City Council of the City of Tampa; WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission held a public hearing during which it reviewed the application and made the determination that the application should be approved for the following reasons: the property subject to the application is located in the Hyde Park Historic District; the improvements made to the property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings; the improvements were made in accordance with the guidelines developed by the Department of State; the improvements equal or exceed the threshold amount; and, the application was accompanied by a partially executed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Covenant which requires the property owner to maintain the historic character of the property, and qualifying improvements thereto, during the exemption period; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tampa held a public hearing during which it received information and made certain findings as required by The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance.

2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section 1. fully set forth herein. That the recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated as if Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Tampa, having held a public hearing on the proposed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application finds that there is evidence to support the following findings: That the property owned by Michael M. Eisenfeld and Beth L. Eisenfeld, located at 813 South Packwood Avenue, Tampa, Florida, and legally described as: See Exhibit "A" Folio No. l86oo is qualified for an historic preservation property tax exemption as it is located in the locally designated Hyde Park Historic District based upon information provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements to the property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings based upon testimony and documentation provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements to the property meet the criteria established by the Department of State based upon testimony and documentation provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements were substantially complete before January 1, Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Tampa having made the above findings renders the following conclusion: The improvements to the property owned by Michael M. Eisenfeld and Beth L. Eisenfeld located at 813 South Packwood Avenue, Tampa, Florida and legally described as: See Exhibit "A" Folio No meet the requirements of The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance and are therefore granted an exemption from ad valorem taxation equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value

3 of all improvements which resulted from the restoration, renovation or rehabilitation of the property for a ten (10) year period commencing January 1, 2008 and expiring December 3 1, This exemptiori does not apply to taxes levied for the payment of bonds or taxes authorized by a vote of the electors pursuant to s. 9(b) or s. 12, Article VII of the State Constitution. Section4. That the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application was accompanied by a partially executed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Covenant which requires the property owner to maintain the historic character of the property, and qualifying improvements thereto, during the exemption period. Said Covenant is made a part of this Ordinance by reference thereto. Section 5. That the Office of the City Clerk shall deliver a copy of the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application and this Ordinance to the Property Appraiser of Hillsborough County. Section 6. That if any part of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, at the City of Tampa's election, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of any conflict. Section 8. becoming a law. That this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon PASSED AND ORDAI TAMPA, FLORIDA, ON ATTEST: E? Qy8Tfit7 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PREPARED BY AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: APPROVED by me on OCT E/S REBECCA KERT ASS1 STANT CITY ATTORNEY MAYOR K:\Debbie\Advalorern\813 S. Packwood Ave\Ordinance

4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 813 S. Packwood Avenuie - Folio#l LINGERLONG LOT 7 BLOCK 5 EXHIBIT A

5 ORDINANCE NO A 0 7 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION RELATIVE TO THE RESTORATION, RENOVATION OR REHABILITATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNED BY CORUNA CORPORATION, LOCATED AT NORTH TAMPA STREET, TAMPA, FLORIDA, IN THE NORTH FRANKLINDOWNTOWN MULTIPLE PROPERTIES HISTORIC DISTRICT, BASED UPON CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tampa is authorized, pursuant to the terms contained in Sections and , Florida Statutes, to adopt an ordinance allowing ad valorem tax exemptions under s.3, Art. VII of the State Constitution to historic properties if the owners are engaging in the restoration, rehabilitation, or renovation of such properties in accordance with guidelines established therein; WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority contained in Ordinance No , passed and ordained by the City Council of the City of Tampa, Florida, on September 9, 1993, an historic preservation property (ad valorem) tax exemption was created for improvements to historic properties completed in accordance with approved guidelines ("The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance"); WHEREAS, Coruna Corporation made certain improvements to the property owned and located at North Tampa Street, Tampa, Florida, and filed an Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application with the Architectural Review Commission for approval by City Council of the City of Tampa; WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission held a public hearing during which it reviewed the application and made the determination that the application should be approved for the following reasons: the property subject to the application is a local landmark located in the North FranklinDowntown Multiple Properties Historic District; the improvements made to the property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings; the improvements were made in accordance with the guidelines developed by the Department of State; the improvements equal or exceed the threshold amount; and, the application was accompanied by a partially executed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Covenant which requires the property owner to maintain the historic character of the property, and qualifying improvements thereto, during the exemption period; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tampa held a public hearing during which it received information and made certain findings as required by The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance.

6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section 1. fully set forth herein. That the recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated as if Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Tampa, having held a public hearing on the proposed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application finds that there is evidence to support the following findings: That the property owned by Coruna Corporation, located at North Tampa Street, Tampa, Florida, and legally described as: See Exhibit "A" Folio No is qualified for an historic preservation property tax exemption as it is a local landmark to the locally designated North FranklidDowntown Multiple Properties Historic District based upon information provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements to the property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings based upon testimony and documentation provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements to the property meet the criteria established by the Department of State based upon testimony and documentation provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements were substantially complete before January 1, Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Tampa having made the above findings renders the following conclusion: The improvements to the property owned by Michael M. Eisenfeld and Beth L. Eisenfeld located at 813 South Packwood Avenue, Tampa, Florida and legally described as: See Exhibit "A" Folio No meet the requirements of The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance and are therefore granted an exemption from ad valorem taxation equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all improvements which resulted from the restoration, renovation or

7 rehabilitation of the property for a ten (10) year period commencing January 1, 2007 and expiring December 31, This exemption does not apply to taxes levied for the payment of bonds or taxes authorized by a vote of the electors pursuant to s. 9(b) or s. 12, Article VII of the State Constitution. Section 4. That the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application was accompanied by a partially executed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Covenant which requires the property owner to maintain the historic character of the property, and qualifying improvements thereto, during the exemption period. Said Covenant is made a part of this Ordinance by reference thereto. Section 5. That the Office of the City Clerk shall deliver a copy of the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application and this Ordinance to the Property Appraiser of Hillsborough County. Section 6. That if any part of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, at the City of Tampa's election, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of any conflict. Section 8. becoming a law. That this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, ON OCT A,-.. _ CITY COUNCIL PREPARED BY AND APPROVED APPROVED by me on OCT AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: EIS REBECCA KERT ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MAYOR K:\Debbie\Advalorem\ N. Franklin St\Ordinance

8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION N. Tampa Street - Folio# TAMPA GENERAL MAP OF I853 S 68 FT 4 INCHES OF N 128 FT 4 INCHES OF LOT 4 BLOCK 58 EXHIBIT A

9 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION RELATIVE TO THE RESTORATION, RENOVATION OR REHABILITATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNED BY BAY BREWING COMPANY, LOCATED AT 2205 NORTH 2oTH STREET, TAMPA, FLORIDA, IN THE YBOR CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT, BASED UPON CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tampa is authorized, pursuant to the terms contained in Sections and 196,1998, Florida Statutes, to adopt an ordinance allowing ad valorem tax exemptions under s.3, Art. VII of the State Constitution to historic properties if the owners are engaging in the restoration, rehabilitation, or renovation of such properties in accordance with guidelines established therein; WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority contained in Ordinance No , passed and ordained by the City Council of the City of Tampa, Florida, on September 9, 1993, an historic preservation property (ad valorem) tax exemption was created for improvements to historic properties completed in accordance with approved guidelines ("The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance"); WHEREAS, Bay Brewing Company made certain improvements to the property owned and located at 2205 North 2oth Street, Tampa, Florida, and filed an Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application with the Architectural Review Commission for approval by City Council of the City of Tampa; WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission held a public hearing during which it reviewed the application and made the determination that the application should be approved for the following reasons: the property subject to the application is located in the Ybor City Historic District; the improvements made to the property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings; the improvements were made in accordance with the guidelines developed by the Department of State; the improvements equal or exceed the threshold amount; and, the application was accompanied by a partially executed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Covenant which requires the property owner to maintain the historic character of the property, and qualifying improvements thereto, during the exemption period; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tampa held a public hearing during which it received information and made certain findings as required by The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance.

10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA. FLORIDA: Section 1. fully set forth herein. That the recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated as if Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Tampa, having held a public hearing on the proposed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application finds that there is evidence to support the following findings: That the ~roperty owned by Bay Brewing Company, located at 2205 North 20' Street, Tampa, Florida, and legally described as: See Exhibit "A" Folio No is qualified for an historic preservation property tax exemption as it is located in the locally and Nationally designated Ybor City Historic District based upon information provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements to the property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings based upon testimony and documentation provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements to the property meet the criteria established by the Department of State based upon testimony and documentation provided by Architectural Review Commission staff. That the improvements were substantially complete before January 1, Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Tampa having made the above findings renders the following conclusion: The improvements to the property owned by Bay Brewing Company located at 2205 North 2oth Street, Tampa, Florida and legally described as: See Exhibit "A" Folio No meet the requirements of The City of Tampa Historic Property Tax Exemption Ordinance and are therefore granted an exemption from ad valorem taxation equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all improvements which resulted from the restoration, renovation or

11 rehabilitation of the property for a ten (10) year period commencing January 1, 2007 and expiring December 31, This exemption does not apply to taxes levied for the payment of bonds or taxes authorized by a vote of the electors pursuant to s. 9(b) or s. 12, Article VII of the State Constitution. Section 4. That the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application was accompanied by a partially executed Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Covenant which requires the property owner to maintain the historic character of the property, and qualifying improvements thereto, during the exemption period. Said Covenant is made a part of this Ordinance by reference thereto. Section 5. That the Office of the City Clerk shall deliver a copy of the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application and this Ordinance to the Property Appraiser of Hillsborough County. Section 6. That if any part of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, at the City of Tampa's election, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of any conflict. Section 8. becoming a law. That this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THECITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, ON Nl PREPARED BY AND APPROVED APPROVED by me on 6CT AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: EIS REBECCAKERT ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY /il MAYOR

12 LEGAL DESCRIPTION " Street - Folio #I YBOR CITY PLAN OF AN ADDITION Lots1 I%22%33%4Y255%66% 77 Y28 8Y29 g1/210 & 10 % Block96 Less E 6 ft of Lots 1 and 10 1/2 EXHIBIT A

13 LAtter Recording, Return to: Return to: City of Tampa Off~ce of the City Clerk 3 15 East Kennedy Blvd., 31d Floor Tampa. Florida Tel: L.D.C. File Ref. No. ENC07-10 Address: 1208 E. Kennedy Boulevard AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN ENCROACHMENT (A PORTION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING) BY GRAND CENTRAL AT KENNEDY, LLC, OVER A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS MADISON STREET AS MORE PARTICLARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENTS AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Ken Stoltenberg, Grand Central at Kennedy, LLC, ("OwnerRetitioner"), is the owner of a certain parcel of real property which has a street address of 1208 E. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, Florida legally described in Exhibit An (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, OwnerRetitioner has filed a Request for Authorization of Encroachment, with the City of Tampa, under Department of Growth Management and Development Services File No. ENC 07-10, dated May 18, 2007 for structure(s) that currently encroach upon a portion of the public right of way; and WHEREAS, Laws of Florida, Chapter , authorizes the City Council of the City of Tampa to authorize a permit for the maintnence of existing encroachments in, on or over public streets; and WHEREAS, the appropriate City departments have reviewed the request and have no objections; and WHEREAS, City Council, having duly held two public hearings and having been presented with competent and substantial evidence on the merits of the petition, finds that granting authorization of the Encroachments with conditions set forth is in all ways proper, in the general public interest and all requirements provided by law have been complied with; and.

14 WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the City Council that the petition filed by the Owner/Petitioner, requesting authorization for the Encroachments as herein set forth upon the terms and conditions hereinafter prescribed should be approved, and that the petition in this instance is in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section 1. Encroachment Authorization: That the proposed Encroachment(s) in, upon or over a portion of the public right of way more particularly described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof, are hereby approved subject to the conditions, covenants and agreements contained in this Ordinance. Section 2. Conditions and Covenants Running with Title to the Land: The Owner/Petitioner, by accepting the privileges granted herein as evidenced by the construction, installation, and maintenance of the Encroachment(s) hereby authorized, does covenant and agree, for himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, with the City of Tampa, its successor and assigns, which covenants and agreements shall be and become and are hereby constituted covenants and agreements running with the title to the Property. The Encroachment(s) authorized by this Ordinance are expressly conditioned upon compliance with and fulfillment of all terms and conditions contained herein and as follows: (a) Citv Authoritv to Reauire Removal of Encroachments: The City reserves the right at all times to require OwnedPetitioner to remove all or any part of the Encroachment(s), at Owner/PetitionerYs own expense, in the event the City of Tampa, acting through its Director of the Department of Public Works, determines that the subject right-ofway is needed for right-of-way purposes or that the Encroachment(s) (or any part thereof) constitute a danger to the health, safety or welfare of the public. The extent to which the Encroachment(s) must be removed shall be in the sole discretion of the Director of the Department of Public Works for the City of Tampa. Absent exigent circumstances or imminent danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public, reasonable written notice of no less than 30-days shall be provided in the event of requiring removal. (b) Insurance Requirement: Petitioner, or successor in interest, shall maintain, and, upon request, shall provide the City of Tampa with evidence of a general liability insurance policy covering bodily injury, death and property damage with a limit of not less than $1,000, for each occurrence and annual aggregate in connection with the Encroachments. Such insurance policy shall be issued by a company authorized to conduct business and to provide insurance in the State of Florida and which is acceptable to the City of Tampa. The insurance

15 policy shall also provide: (a) that the City of Tampa is named as an additional insured; (b) for severability of interest; and (c) thirty (30) days prior written notice fiom the insurance company to the City of Tampa of any proposed termination, cancellation or material change in the insurance coverage or limits. The insurance coverage required herein shall be primary to any insurance carried by the City of Tampa or any self-insurance of the City of Tampa. The insurance coverage and limits required herein shall be evidenced by a properly executed certificate of insurance on a form or on forms furnished or required by the City of Tampa. The OwnerPetitioner shall maintain said insurance and provide the City of Tampa with evidence thereof as a condition precedent to the erection of the Encroachments and thereafter for so long as the Encroachments continue to exist. (c) (d) Hold Harmless: The OwnerPetitioner shall waive renounce, relinquish absolve defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Tampa fiom and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments and decrees of any kind and character whatsoever arising out of or resulting from the use, construction, maintenance, operation or existence of such encroachments. That the OwnerPetitioner shall maintain and repair the Encroachments in a manner that comply with and meet all fire and building code requirements. Section 3. Authorization to City Officers: The proper officers of the City of Tampa are hereby authorized to issue a building permit or permits in accordance herewith, and to do and perform all other things necessary to carry out and make effective the provisions of this Ordinance. Section 4. Recording: The City Clerk shall certify and record a copy of this Ordinance in the Offke of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida. Section 5. becoming a law. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLOFUDA ON 1-7.

16 ATTEST: V PAM IORIO, MAYOR Prepared by: e/s/jliwe KABOUGERIS. ESQ. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY (Pelition of Ken Sfolfenbetg. Grand Cenfral of Kennedy, LLC- ENCO7-10)

17 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (FROM TITLE COMMITMENT) THAT PART OF BLOCK 2, INTER-STATE INVESTMENT COMPANY'S PLAT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 54 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAlD BLOCK 2; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAlD BLOCK 2, SOUTH 89'37'45" EAST, FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF LOT "C"; THENCE ALONG SAlD WEST BOUNDARY, SOUTH 01'36'56" WEST, FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "DM; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAlD LOT "D" SOUM 01'46'54" WEST,' FEET TO A POINT FEET NORTH OF THE ORIGINAL PLATTED SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAlD BLOCK 2; THENCE ALONG A LINE FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE ORIGINAL PLATTED SOUM BOUNDARY OF SAlD BLOCK 2, NORTH 89'40'34" WEST, FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAlD BLOCK 2; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAlD BLOCK 2, NORTH 04'13'31" WEST, FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING ACRES, MORE OR LESS, GRAND CENTRAL PARENT TRACT EXHIBIT "Am

18 DESCRIPTION SKETCH - NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF MADISON STREET AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF INTER-STATE INVESTMENT COMPANY'S PLAT No. 1, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11 PAGE 54, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 16, BLOCK 2, THENCE N89'37'45"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 2, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING ~89'37'45"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET, THENCE N00D22'15"E DEPARTING SAID NORTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 1.10 FEET, THENCE S89'37'45"E. A DISTANCE OF FEET, THENCE S00'22'1Sn~, A DISTANCE OF 1.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LYING BETWEEN ELEVATION FEET AND ELEVATION FEET, WHICH IS BASED UPON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF CONTAINING SQUARE FEET OR ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CONTAINING CUBIC FEET, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT "B" NOTES: 1. THlS DESCRIPTION SKETCH IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATED BELOW. 2. THlS DESCRIPTION SKETCH MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE BY REPRODUCTION. THlS MUST BE CONSIDERED WHEN OBTAINING SCALED INFORMATION. 3. THlS DESCRIPTION HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. PROJECT: GRAND CENTRAL EAST BUILDING - FOUNDATION ENCROACHMENT ASEMEN1

19 DESCRIPTION SKETCH - NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY N A + MADISON SCALE: lu=10' -' 0' 5'.rL1\ 0 a STREET POINT OF (60' PLAmD 'IW) xt COMMENCEMENT NORTHEAST CORNER SOUTHERLY R/W OF LOT 16, BLOCK 2 OF MADISON STREIT S 8Y37'45''F.To.()oP \ POINT OF \ 6 BEGINNING NORTH BOUNDARY 1 L ~ LIN ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OF BLOCK 2 (I st FLOOR5 I 1 I- 9 LL LINE TABLE 0 BEARING Z 0 m EXHIBIT "B" LEGEND R/W = RIGHT OF WAY

20 --- +KW MADISON STREET SECTION AT BUILDING 2 FOUNDATION ENCROACHMENT W I ' r 4 ' EXHIBIT "B" *rp IJ:03:57 page 3 of 3 ICICRW~X:\EF(~\WWR~)O\Z-ENCRWM-XC.~WQ

21 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT (S-2); APPROVING A DRIVE THRU BANK IN A CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3001 NORTH HIMES AVENUE, 3411 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE AND 3410 WEST KATHLEEN STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HEREOF; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Tampa Code Section (b)(2) requests for certain specified uses and occupancies involving matters deemed to be of citywide or area-wide importance must be submitted to the City Council for consideration and approval as a Special Use Permit (S-2); and, WHEREAS, a public hearing as required by law was held in City Council Chambers, Third Floor, City Hall, 315 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, Florida, relating to approval of the special-use permit for the real estate described in Section 1 of this ordinance under the terms and provisions of Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That a Special Use Permit (S-2) for the real estate situate, lying and being in the City of Tampa, and as more particularly described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A), (Attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit is hereby approved to allow a Drive thru Bank in a CG zoning district. Section 2. That said Special Use Permit (S-2) and all construction and use of the above-described property shall be controlled by the approved, certified site development plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B. Section 3. That said Special Use Permit (S-2) is subject to a build-out deadline of two years from the effective date hereof. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in cancellation of this Special Use Permit. Section 4. That approval of this Special Use Permit (S-2) shall not release the PetitionerIOwner from meeting the requirements of the City of Tampa's Concurrency Management System Ordinance at the time of actual permitting and development of the above-described use site. Section 5. That the approval of this Special Use Permit (S-2) shall not release petitioner from meeting all other applicable sections of the City of Tampa

22 Code, as such sections relate to the actual permitting and development of the abovedescribed site. Section 6. Based on the evidence contained in the record of the proceedings, it is hereby found that the proposed special use herein approved will promote the public health, safety and general welfare, complies with all required regulations and standards of Chapter 27, is compatible with contiguous and surrounding property or is a public necessity, is in conformity with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, and will not establish a precedent of, or encourage, more intensive or incompatible uses in the surrounding area and complies with all required regulations and standards of Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code. Section 7. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 8. That if any part of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, at the City of Tampa's election, shall remain in full force and effect. a law. Section 9. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon becoming PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA ON ATTEST: CITY COUNCI PAM IORIO, MAYOR PREPARED BY AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: DONNA WYSONG ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

23 Petition for Special Use II Clty af Tampl 306 Bst Jackson Strnt. 35 Tampa, FL (el 3) or 8405 (813) fax - mal Deswn (use separate s h w needed) - MUST BF TYPED & DO NOT ABBREVIATE ; LOTS 7, 889, 10, ll,l2, 13,148 15, 16, 17AND 18, BLOCK66rK)HN H. DREW'S FIRST EXTENSION TO NORTW WEST TAMPA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 42 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF VACATED ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ABlJlTlNG LOTS 7THROUGH 12, INCLUSIVE, AND LYING NORTH OF THE ABUmlNG LOTS 13 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, L SS THAT PORTION OF LOTS 13 AND 14 CONVEYED TO THE CrrY OF TAMPA IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 11 71, PAGE 120 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6041 PAGE 1952 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND ALSO LESS THAT PORTION OF LOTS 17 AND 18 CONVEYED TOTHE CITY OF TAMPA IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 14061, PAGE 681, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA Clty of Tampa Right of Ulay & Mopping SBctlon LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPRWED EXHIBIT "A"

24 ORDINANCE NO / 1 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT (S-2); APPROVING AN OFF-STREET ACCESSORY CHURCH PARKING LOT IN AN RM-24 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF AND 2419 EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HEREOF; APPROVING WAIVERS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Tampa Code Section (b)(2) requests for certain specified uses and occupancies involving matters deemed to be of citywide or area-wide importance must be submitted to the City Council for consideration and approval as a Special Use Permit (S-2); and, WHEREAS, a public hearing as required by law was held in City Council Chambers, Third Floor, City Hall, 315 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, Florida, relating to approval of the special-use permit for the real estate described in Section 1 of this ordinance under the terms and provisions of Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That a Special Use Permit (S-2) for the real estate situate, lying and being in the City of Tampa, and as more particularly described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A) Y is hereby approved to allow an off-street accessory church parking lot in an RM-24 zoning district. Waivers are granted as follows: Tampa Code Section to allow a waiver of the required 10' buffer with 6' masonry wall to a 5' buffer with a 6' wood fence with vine every 10' along the western and southern property lines; Tampa Code Section (k) to allow a waiver to allow more than fifty percent (50%) grass parking; Tampa Code Section Cj) to allow a waiver to allow access on a local street for non-residential traffic. Section 2. That said Special Use Permit (S-2) and all construction and use of the above-described property shall be controlled by the approved, certified site development plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B.

25 Section 3. That said Special Use Permit (S-2) is subject to a build-out deadline of two years from the effective date hereof. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in cancellation of this Special Use Permit. Section 4. That approval of this Special Use Permit (S-2) shall not release the PetitionerIOwner from meeting the requirements of the City of Tampa's Concurrency Management System Ordinance at the time of actual permitting and development of the above-described use site. Section 5. That the approval of this Special Use Permit (S-2) shall not release petitioner from meeting all other applicable sections of the City of Tampa Code, as such sections relate to the actual permitting and development of the abovedescribed site. Section 6. Based on the evidence contained in the record of the proceedings, it is hereby found that the proposed special use herein approved will promote the public health, safety and general welfare, complies with all required regulations and standards of Chapter 27, is compatible with contiguous and surrounding property or is a public necessity, is in conformity with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, and will not establish a precedent of, or encourage, more intensive or incompatible uses in the surrounding area and complies with all required regulations and standards of Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code. Section 7. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 8. That if any part of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, at the City of Tampa's election, shall remain in full force and effect. a law. Section 9. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon becoming

26 PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA ON &T ATTEST: APPROVED by me on OCT PAM IORIO, MAYOR PREPARED BY AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: E/S DONNA WYSONG ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY V07-41

27 Petition for Special Use II Leoal O w r i m (we if needed) - MUST BE TYPED & DO NOT ABBREVIATE : THE NORTH 86 FEET OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, SANDER'S AND CLAYS ADDITION TO EAST YBOR, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 32 OF TH PUBLIC RECORDS OF HKLSBORWGH COUNTY. FLORIDA. 1 EXHIBIT "A"

28 -* ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF ZACK STREET, THE WEST SIDE OF NEBRASKA AVENUE AND THE NORTH SIDE OF TWIGGS STREET, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION(S) CBD-2 (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) TO CBD-2 (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, MIXED-USE OFFICE, RETAIL, RESIDENTIAL, HOTEL); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a public hearing as required by law was held in City Council Chambers, Third Floor, City Hall, 315 East Kennedy Boulevard, in the City of Tampa, Florida, relating to the rezoning of the real estate described in Section 1 of this ordinance under the terms and provisions of Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section I. That the Zoning District Classification upon the following described real estate, situate, lying and being in the City of Tampa, County of Hillsborough and State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A), (Attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit which is presently zoned CBD-2 (central business district) under City of Tampa Code Chapter 27, be changed to ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CBD-2 (central business district, mixed-use office, retail, residential, hotel), as provided for in Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code, and that the zoning map be amended to reflect said change on the above-described legal description and all information shown thereof shall be as much a part of this ordinance as if such information set forth on said zoning map of the City of Tampa was all fully described and set out herein. Section 2. That said Zoning District Classification is hereby amended and to be controlled by the approved, certified site development plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B. Section 3. That approval of this rezoning shall not release the PetitionedOwner from meeting the requirements of the City of Tampa's Concurrency Management System Ordinance at the time of actual permitting and development of the rezoned site. Section 4. That the approval of said rezoning shall not release the PetitionedOwner from meeting all other applicable sections of the City of Tampa Code, as such sections relate to the actual permitting and development of the rezoned site.

29 Section 5. extent of any conflict. That all ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the Section 6. That if any part of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. becoming a law. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon PASSED AND 0 TAMPA, FLORIDA ON CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATTEST: ' CITY COUNCI~ v APPROVED by me on OCT & PAM IORIO, MAYOR PREPARED BY AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: EIS DONNA WYSONG ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

30 Union Station Rezoning Legal Description Lot I, 2,3 and 4, Block 4, Map Of Binkley's Addition To Ft. Brooke, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book I, Page(s) 4 1. Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida. Also Together With: Lot 10, Block 1, Chas Wright Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book I. Page 95. Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, less any part of the following described property which lies within the west 15 feet of said Lot 10. Begin at the northeast comer of the aforementioned Lot 10, thence. southerly along the east lot line of the aforementioned Lot 10, a distance of 5.74 feet; thence westerly to a point on the west lot line of the aforementioned Lot 10. Said point being 4.43 feet south of the northwest corner of the aforementioned Lot 10; thence, northerly along the west lot line of the aforementioned Lot 10 to the northwest comer of the aforementioned Lot 10; thence easterly along the north lot line of the aforementioned Lot 10 to the point of beginning. Also Together With: A tract of land lying in Section 24, Township 29 South, Range 18 East, Hillsborough County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the northeast comer of Lot 10, Block I, Chas Wright Subdivision. as recorded, in Plat Book 1, Page 95. Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, and run easterly on Zack Street 73.5 feet; Thence southerly to a point lying on the easterly extension of the northerly lot line of Lot I, Block 1, of the aforementioned Chas Wright Subdivision; Thence westerly along said line to a point lying on the southerly extension of the easterly lot line of Lot 10, Block I, of the aforenientioned Chas Wright Subdivision; Thence northerly along said line to beginning, less the following described Tract: Begin at a point on the south property line of Zack Street, which point is situate 77.3 feet easterly from the northeast comer of Lot 10, Block 1, of Chas Wright Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 95, Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida; Thencc southwesterly in a straight line (henin referred to as the "first described line") making a southwesterly angle of 73"24' with the south line of Zack Street, a distance of feet to a point on the north line of an alley; Thence westerly along the aforementioned north line of an alley, a distance of 17.7 feet; Thence northerly in a straight line making an angle of 90 with the north line of the aforementioned alley, a distance of 3.6 feet; Thence northeasterly in a straight line, which is parallel with an 18.0 feet distant at tight angles from the "First described line" above referred to, a distance of 93.3 feet, to a point on the south property line of Zack Street; Thence easterly along the south line of Zack Street. a distance of feet to the point of beginning.

31 Also Together With: A tract of land lying in Section 24, Township 29 South, Range 18 East. Hillsborough County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of Block 5 1 of Tampa, according to the Map thereof recorded in Plat Book I, Page 7, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, and run thence easterly along the north side of Twiggs Street 245 feet to a point of beginning, from said point of beginning, nm north at right angles or 90 with the said north line of Twiggs Street to south side of alley in Block 1 of Chas Wright Subdivision, according to the Map thereof as the same appears of record in Plat Book I. Page 95, Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, run thence in a northeasterly direction along south side of said alley feet, run thence southeasterly at right angles or 90 with south side of said alley in said Block 1 of Chas Wright Subdivision to the north line oftwiggs Street, run thence soulhwesterly along north line of Twiggs Street, feet to Point of Beginning. Also Together With: Lot F of Block 3 of Map Of Binkley's Addition To Ft. Brooke, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book I, Page 41, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, and a tract beginning at the southwest comer of said Lot F, run north along west line of said Lot F feet to alley, thence southwesterly feet along south side of alley, thence southeasterfy 98.5 feet to a Point of Beginning all in said Map Of Binkley's Addition To Ft. Brooke. Also Together With: Lot 1. Less the north 5 feet thereof and all of Lots 7,8,9, 10, 1 I, and 12, Block 3; and Lots 7,8,9, 10, and 11. Block 4; Lot B and Lot C of Map Of Binkley's Addition To Ft. Brooke, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book I, Page 41. Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida. Also Together With: Lot 5. BIock 4, Map Of Binkley's Addition To Ft. Brooke, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 41. ofthe Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida. Clcy of Tampa filght d Way 61 wing Sectlen C,EGfX I)ESCAIPTION AePROVQ

32 ORDINANCE NO d 1-3 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 120 SOUTH EDISON AVENUE AND 909 WEST CLEVELAND STREET, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION(S) RM-24 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) AND PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PROFESSIONAL OFFICE); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a public hearing as required by law was held in City Council Chambers, Third Floor, City Hall, 315 East Kennedy Boulevard, in the City of Tampa, Florida, relating to the rezoning of the real property described in Section 1 of this ordinance under the terms and provisions of Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the Zoning District Classification upon the following described real property, situate, lying and being in the City of Tampa, County of Hillsborough and State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A), (Attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit which is presently zoned RM-24 (residential multi-family) and PD (planned development) under City of Tampa Code Chapter 27, be changed to ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD (planned development, professional office), as provided for in Chapter 27, City of Tampa Code, and that the zoning map be amended to reflect said change on the abovedescribed legal description and all information shown thereof shall be as much a part of this ordinance as if such information set forth on said zoning map of the City of Tampa was all fully described and set out herein. Section 2. That said Zoning District Classification is hereby amended and to be controlled by the approved, certified site development plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B. Section 3. That approval of this rezoning shall not release the PetitionerIOwner from meeting the requirements of the City of Tampa's Concurrency Management System Ordinance at the time of actual permitting and development of the rezoned site, if applicable. Section 4. That the approval of said rezoning shall not release the PetitionerlOwner from meeting all other applicable sections of the City of Tampa

33 Code, as such sections relate to the actual permitting and development of the rezoned site. Section 5. That all ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the extent of any conflict. Section 6. That if any part of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. becoming a law. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon PASSED AND OF TAMPA, FLORIDA ON, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ATTEST: CITY COUNC~ PREPARED BY AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: PAM IOIUO, MAYOR E/S DONNA WYSONG ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

34 Petition to Rezone Cky dtmmp. Land Dwolopmant Coordination 306 East Jackson Stmat, 3E Tmmpa, FL (8 13) or M03 (81 3) fax Leaal Description (use separate shw If needed) - MUST BE TYPED & DO NOT ABBRNIATE : The north 35.8 feet of Lot 6, Blodc 10 together wkh that part of Lot 5, Block 10, Alice Kelly's Subdivislon, according to the map or plat thenof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 38 of the Public Records of Hlllsborough County, Florida. That part of Lot 5, Block 10 being more parllcularly described as followr Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 5, Biodc 10. Alke Kelly's Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 1, Page 38 of the publk records of Hillsborough County, Florida; thence run North 3 few thence West 49 fee thence North 3.Ofeet; thence West 79.5 fee thence South 6 feet and thence East 1285 feet to the pdnt of beglnnlng) togethuwfth the west 62Afeet of Lot 7, and the West 62.5 feet of the South 30.2 fed of Lot 6, Block 10 Alke Kelly's Subdivision according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 38, of the public records of Hlllsborough County. Florida. The South 30.2 feet of the East 66 feet of Lot 6 and the East 66 feet of Lot 7, Block 10, Alice Kelly's Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 38 of the public records of Hilbborough County, Florfda. EXHIBIT " A