BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Transcription

1 6P BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY PLACEMENT: PUBLIC HEARINGS PRESET: TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF THE MARTIN COUNTY ZONING ATLAS TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON A 21.7-ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SE KUBIN AVENUE, IN ROCKY POINT, CONCURRENT WITH CPA 16-8, MAGGY'S HAMMOCK PARK AGENDA ITEM DATES: MEETING DATE: 7/26/2016 COMPLETED DATE: 7/14/2016 COUNTY ATTORNEY: 7/4/2016 ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: 7/11/2016 REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: Name: Deborah Drum Ecosystem Manager Name: Procedures: Quasi-Judicial Procedures EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Growth Management Richard Lawton Planner II Estimated staff presentation: 5 minutes. The applicant requests the Board of County Commissioners adopt a resolution to change the zoning district from R-1B and RE-1/2A to PC and PR; concurrent with CPA 16-8, Maggy's Hammock Park, a Future Land Use Map amendment. The Local Planning Agency voted 3-0 to recommend the PR zoning district. APPROVAL: LEG ACA CA 807a9fba 1 of 14

2 BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL: Rezonings are quasi-judicial actions involving the application of general rules of policy to specific situations. Policy 4.4A.1. Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, Martin County Code, states: Parcels being considered for amendment to the future land use designation shall be concurrently evaluated for rezoning to the most appropriate zoning district in the most recently adopted Land Development Regulations. ISSUES: A concurrent rezoning will be considered for each Future Land Use Map Amendment where the amendment creates an inconsistency with the current zoning designation. Each rezoning will be considered separately by the Board pursuant to the quasi-judicial public hearing procedures attached. Analysis of the proposed rezoning can be found in the related but separate Board item on CPA 16-8, Maggy's Hammock Park. LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW: Because this request involves the application of a policy to a specific rezoning application and site, it is a quasi-judicial decision. Quasi-judicial proceedings must be conducted with more formality than a legislative proceeding. In quasi-judicial proceedings, parties are entitled as a matter of due process to cross-examine witnesses, present evidence, demand that witnesses testify under oath, and demand a decision that is based on a correct application of the law and competent substantial evidence in the record. Suggested procedures to follow during consideration of this matter: Cautionary Note: It is advisable that Commissioners refrain from commenting on any of the presentation, items, evidence, witness testimony, or otherwise, until the Chair concludes the quasi-judicial components of the meeting and the Board begins its deliberations. The Commission may and should ask questions of any witnesses. 1. Chair announces this matter from the Agenda for the record. 2. Chair will inquire of the Commissioners regarding ex parte communications related to this matter and any disclosures that have not been previously filed with the Clerk. 3. Chair will ask that all staff witnesses, applicant witnesses and members of the public that intend to offer relevant and material evidence in this matter identify themselves. All witnesses should be asked to approach the well and be sworn in by the Clerk of Court or the Clerk s designee. 4. Martin County staff should provide a brief introduction of the matter, to include substantive staff findings and relevant procedural history. Although Commissioners may ask questions of staff at this time, Commissioners may want to refrain until the applicant has completed the applicant s presentation. 807a9fba 2 of 14

3 5. Upon conclusion of staff s brief introduction, the applicant may make a presentation and discuss any information in the application that the applicant deems appropriate. For this matter it is anticipated that the applicant should be provided no more than 45 minutes to present. However, depending upon questions from the Commissioners, examination of evidence, and cross examination of witnesses, it may be appropriate to extend the time to the extent necessary to ensure that due process has been provided. 6. Upon conclusion of the applicant s presentation, the Commissioners may proffer questions for the applicant and staff regarding the matter. Questions should be designed to elicit relevant and material evidence concerning the matter. Comments concerning the credibility, the authenticity of the evidence, the weight of the evidence, or otherwise should not be made at this time. Such comments may be made during the Commission s deliberations. 7. Upon conclusion of Commissioners questions, the Chair shall allow public comment regarding this matter. 8. Upon conclusion of public comment, the applicant should be offered an opportunity for rebuttal and/or final comments (maximum of 20 minutes). 9. Upon conclusion of the applicant s rebuttal, staff should be offered an opportunity for any final comments. 10. After the conclusion of the quasi-judicial components set forth in paragraphs 1 through 9 above, the Chair shall close the public portion of the meeting and announce that no other evidence will be entertained or considered. Once the public portion of the meeting is closed, the Chair may entertain motions to approve, approve with modifications or deny the request for the alteration of the previously approved preserve area, and the Board should deliberate accordingly. Legal principles to be considered: Consideration of the legal principles that an appellate court would consider in the review of a quasi-judicial decision by a local government can provide guidance as the Board conducts this quasi-judicial proceeding. Quasi-judicial decisions are subject to a certiorari standard of review on appeal. The standard of review before the circuit court is as follows: 1) whether procedural due process was afforded, 2) whether the local tribunal observed the essential requirements of law, and 3) whether the local government s decision was based on competent substantial evidence. One of the requirements of procedural due process is met when the parties have received notice of the meeting and are given an opportunity to be heard. Following the procedures outlined above will help support a finding that procedural due process was afforded. Another component of procedural due process is whether the applicant was given an opportunity to be heard by a neutral and impartial decision-maker. There must be evidence in the record to support or deny a request. Therefore, a decision to approve or deny a request before the presentation of the evidence and testimony is concluded would not be appropriate. 807a9fba 3 of 14

4 The essential requirements of law are met when the correct provisions of applicable law are applied in making the decision and the decision-maker does not abuse its legal authority in the process. A determination that a decision was based on competent substantial evidence requires that there must be testimony and evidence provided that is relevant and material to the determination. The evidence relied upon to sustain the ultimate findings should be sufficiently relevant and material to the matter so that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached. Testimony must have a factual basis. Generalized statements in support of or in opposition to a proposal should be disregarded even those from an expert. Relevant fact-based statements, whether expert or not should be considered. Citizen testimony is permissible and may constitute competent substantial evidence if it is fact-based. The facts upon which the testimony rests may be derived from relevant portions of the record or from other factual information provided in the application. The submittal of materials into the record such as maps, site plans, and traffic studies along with testimony based on professional experience and personal observations may form the basis for upholding a conclusion reached by a decision-maker. RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECOMMENDATION Move that the Board accept into evidence the Agenda item, Staff Report and associated exhibits for CPA 16-8 Maggy s Hammock Park and approve Maggy s Hammock Park zoning change from R-1B and RE-1/2A to PC and PR as presented. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Move that the Board deny the request for a re-zoning. 2. Move that the Board request staff provide additional information and continue the item to a future date. FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION Staff time. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Staff time. 2. Staff time. DOCUMENT(S) REQUIRING ACTION: Budget Transfer / Amendment Chair Letter Contract / Agreement Grant / Application Notice Ordinance 1 Resolution Other: ROUTING: _ ADM _ BLD _ CDD _ COM _ ENG _ FRD _ GMD _ GSD _ ITS _ LIB _ MCA _ MPO _ PRD _ USD X CA X ACA X LEG 807a9fba 4 of 14

5 QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURES 1. Ex parte disclosures by County Commissioners. NOTE: Chairman asks: "Do any commissioners have ex parte disclosures that have not been previously filed with the Clerk?" NOTE: Commissioners use written disclosure forms to disclose communications they had prior to this public meeting with persons interested in this matter. Copies of the disclosure are forms available from the Clerk. 2. If applicable, verification by Applicant that return receipts for notices have been filed with the Clerk. 3. Request for identification of any Intervenors. (In order to be an Intervenor, a person must qualify to receive mailed notice of the subject application in accordance with Section 10.6.E, Land Development Regulations, Martin County Code (property owners within 300 feet of the project if it is inside the urban service boundary, and within 600 feet of the project if it is outside the urban service boundary). Any person who qualifies may choose to be an Intervenor. In addition, an Intervenor must file a form of intent with the County Administrator not less than 7 days prior to the Board meeting. No fee will be assessed on Intervenor. If the Intervenor is representing a group/association, he/she must file a letter on official letterhead signed by an authorized representative of the group/association, stating that he/she is authorized to speak for the group.) 4. *Administration of oath to all witnesses. 5. Staff introduction of application. 6. Questions for Staff from County Commissioners. 7. Applicant presentation. (Applicant is encouraged to keep presentation clear, concise and to the point, at a maximum of 45 minutes. Applicant s questions for staff are to be asked during Applicant s 45 minute presentation. Staff responses to questions will be at the conclusion of the Applicant s presentation. All dvd, cd or video cassette tapes must be submitted for review by the County Administrator by the Friday prior to the meeting.) 8. Questions for Applicant from County Commissioners, Intervenor, and Staff. 9. Intervenor presentations. (Intervenors are encouraged to keep presentation clear, concise and to the point, at a maximum of 45 minutes for all Intervenors collectively. Intervenors questions for staff are to be asked during Intervenors collective 45 minute presentation. Staff responses to questions will be at the conclusion of Intervenors presentation(s). All dvd, cd or video cassette tapes must be submitted for review by the County Administrator by the Friday prior to the meeting.) 10.Questions for Intervenor(s) from Board of County Commissioners, Applicant, Staff. 11.Public Comments. 12.Intervenor(s) rebuttal and/or final comments (maximum 20 minutes collectively). 13.Applicant rebuttal and/or final comments (maximum 20 minutes). 14.Staff Final Comments. 15.County Commissioners final questions, deliberation and decision. 5 of 14

6 MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUEST TO INTERVENE Date: Proposal/Project Name: Agenda Date: Agenda Item Number: An intervenor is a person who qualifies under the Land Development Regulations to receive mailed notice regarding the subject matter (property owners within 300 feet of the project if it is inside the urban service boundary, and within 600 feet of the project if it is outside the urban service boundary). Any person who qualifies may choose to be an Intervenor, or to just offer public comment. Someone who does not qualify to be an Intervenor, or could qualify, but chooses not to be one, will be allowed to speak briefly on his or her own behalf, either to present facts or to state opinions, during public comments on the application. It should be noted that being an Intervenor in a matter under consideration by the Board does not guarantee that the Intervenor can challenge or appeal the final decision in a judicial or administrative proceeding. Also, being an Intervenor here may not even be a prerequisite to filing a challenge or appeal of the final decision, depending upon what state laws or court rules require. Please complete the following information and return this form to the County Administrator at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing on the matter. No fee will be assessed. If requesting to intervene as a group, provide on group s letterhead, signed by an authorized representative of the group, stating the name of the group and the name of the individual who is authorized to speak for the group. Only one request needs to be submitted per each matter for which status as an Intervenor is sought, irrespective of the number of hearings to be held on the matter. All dvd, cd or video cassette tapes must be submitted for review by the County Administrator (or designee) by the Friday prior to the meeting. A Request to Intervene may be used only for the purpose of presenting evidence and testimony on a matter, and not merely to extend the time allowed to an individual to speak during public comments. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Name (individual or group representative): Group Name (if applicable): Address: City: Zip Code: Telephone: 1. Explain what interest(s) you, as an individual or group, believe will be impacted by the p roposal. Examples of interests include health and safety, police and fire protection service systems, transportation facilities, and economic, environmental or natural resources. (Attach separate sheet, if more space is needed.) 2. State your position regarding the proposal. (Attach separate sheet, if more space is needed.) 3. State all facts you believe support your position. (Attach separate sheet, if more space is needed.) 6 of 14

7 Prepared By: Richard Lawton Martin County Growth Management Department 2401 S.E. Monterey Road Stuart, FL [space above line provided for recording data] BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA, REGARDING AN APPLICATION BY MARTIN COUNTY, TO CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1B (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND RE-1/2A (RESIDENTIAL ESTATE) TO PC (PUBLIC CONSERVATION) AND PR (PUBLIC RECREATION) ON 21.7-ACRES LOCATED ALONG SE KUBIN AVENUE, IN ROCKY POINT. WHEREAS, this Board has made the following determinations of fact: 1. Martin County submitted an application for a change in zoning district classification from R-1B (Single-family Residential) and RE-1/2A (Residential Estate) to PC (Public Conservation) for the property described in Exhibit A, and from R-1B (Single-family Residential) to PR (Public Recreation) for the property described in Exhibit B, exhibits attached hereto. 2. The Local Planning Agency heard the application at a public hearing on January 21, 2016 and recommended its approval to the Board of County Commissioners. 3. This Board has considered such recommendations. 4. Upon proper notice of hearing this Board held a public hearing on the application on July 26, At the public hearing, all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard. 6. All conditions precedent to granting the change in zoning district classification have been met. 7. The rezoning approved herein is consistent with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: A. The zoning district classification of the property described in Exhibit A is hereby changed from R-1B (Single-family Residential) and RE-1/2A (Residential Estate) to PC (Public Conservation). The zoning district classification of the property described in Exhibit B is hereby changed from R-1B (Single-family Residential) to PR (Public Recreation). Page 1 of 2 7 of 14

8 B. Pursuant to Section 5.32.B.3.f., Land Development Regulations, Martin County Code, this rezoning action is hereby determined to meet the requirements for a Certificate of Public Facilities Exemption. C. Pursuant to Section 14.1C.5.(2), Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, Martin County Code, regarding preliminary development approvals, the property described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B is subject to a determination of level of service capacity at final site plan approval and no rights to obtain final development orders, nor any other rights to develop the subject property have been granted or implied by this Board. D. The effective date of this resolution, if Comprehensive Plan Amendment 16-8, Maggy's Hammock Park, is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If Comprehensive Plan Amendment 16-8 is timely challenged, this resolution shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining Comprehensive Plan Amendment 16-8 to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 16-8 may be issued or commence before Comprehensive Plan Amendment 16-8 becomes effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, Comprehensive Plan Amendment 16-8 may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status. E. This resolution shall be recorded in the public records of Martin County. A copy of this resolution shall be forwarded to the applicant(s) by the Growth Management Department subsequent to recording. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 26 TH DAY OF JULY, ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CAROLYN TIMMANN CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER BY: ANNE SCOTT CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: BY: MICHAEL D. DURHAM COUNTY ATTORNEY Page 2 of 2 8 of 14

9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING LOTS 25, 28 AND 33 OF THE PLAT OF THE COMMISSIONERS SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 13 AND 14 OF THE MILES OR HANSON GRANT, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 89, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH (NOW MARTIN) COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: LOT 1 OF THE RONI SUBDIVISION, PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 14, PUBLIC RECORDS, MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE EAST 10 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO KUBIN ROAD: LOT 33 ACCORDING TO PLAT OF SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 13 AND 14 OF THE HANSON GRANT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT FILED JUNE 29, 1910, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 89, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS (NOW MARTIN COUNTY). ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN LOTS 28 AND 33 OF THE PLAT OF THE COMMISSIONERS SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 13 AND 14 OF THE MILES OR HANSON GRANT, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 89, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH (NOW MARTIN) COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS FEET EASTERLY OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULARLY, THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID LOTS 28 AND 33 AND FEET NORTHERLY OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULARLY, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 33; THENCE NORTH 28 17'39 WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID LOTS 28 AND 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 65 49'38 EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 17'39 EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID LOTS 28 AND 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 49'38 WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 46, SQUARE FEET OR ACRES MORE OR LESS. NET PARCEL AREA CONTAINING ACRES MORE OR LESS. 9 of 14

10 SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS BASED ON OFFICE INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHALL NOT BE VALID UNLESS: A) PROVIDED IN ITS ENTIRETY CONSISTING OF 3 SHEETS, WITH SHEET 3 BEING THE SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION. B) REPRODUCTION OF THE DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH ARE SIGNED AND SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED SURVEYOR'S SEAL. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. KUBIN AVENUE, SAID CENTERLINE BEARING SOUTH 46 10'13" EAST AND BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM FLORIDA EAST ZONE NAD 83/90. CERTIFICATION (NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SAID SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR SURVEYS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J , FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION FLORIDA STATE STATUTES. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE. DATE OF SIGNATURE PETER ANDERSEN PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO of 14

11 LOT 25 NOT TO SCALE LOT 28 POINT OF BEGINNING OUT PARCEL LOT 33 LOT 1 NOTE: This drawing does not represent a boundary survey and is based on office information only. 11 of 14

12 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN LOTS 28 AND 33 OF THE PLAT OF THE COMMISSIONERS SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 13 AND 14 OF THE MILES OR HANSON GRANT, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 89, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH (NOW MARTIN) COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS FEET EASTERLY OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULARLY, THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID LOTS 28 AND 33 AND FEET NORTHERLY OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULARLY, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 33; THENCE NORTH 28 17'39 WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID LOTS 28 AND 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 65 49'38 EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 17'39 EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID LOTS 28 AND 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 49'38 WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 33, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 46, SQUARE FEET OR ACRES MORE OR LESS. 12 of 14

13 SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS BASED ON OFFICE INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHALL NOT BE VALID UNLESS: A) PROVIDED IN ITS ENTIRETY CONSISTING OF 3 SHEETS, WITH SHEET 3 BEING THE SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION. B) REPRODUCTION OF THE DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH ARE SIGNED AND SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED SURVEYOR'S SEAL. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. KUBIN AVENUE, SAID CENTERLINE BEARING SOUTH 46 10'13" EAST AND BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM FLORIDA EAST ZONE NAD 83/90. CERTIFICATION (NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SAID SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR SURVEYS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J , FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION FLORIDA STATE STATUTES. THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE. DATE OF SIGNATURE PETER ANDERSEN PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO of 14

14 LOT 25 NOT TO SCALE LOT 28 POINT OF BEGINNING LOT 33 LOT 1 NOTE: This drawing does not represent a boundary survey and is based on office information only. 14 of 14