Guiding Cases in Perspective TM 指导性案例透视. Guiding Case No. 10: CGCP Annotations. April 30, 2016 Edition
|
|
- Stephen Jacobs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Guiding Cases in Perspective TM TM 指导性案例透视 Dr. Mei Gechlik Founder and Director, China Guiding Cases Project Lear Liu and XIAO Qin Editors, China Guiding Cases Project Guiding Case No. 10: CGCP Annotations April 30, 2016 Edition The citation of this piece is: Mei Gechlik, Lear Liu, & XIAO Qin, Guiding Case No. 10: CGCP Annotations, STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT, Guiding Cases in Perspective TM, Apr. 30, 2016, The authors thank Thomas Rimmer for assisting in the translation of the Chinese version of this piece into English and Jordan Corrente Beck for editing the English version. Guiding Cases in Perspective TM is a unique serial publication of the China Guiding Cases Project that identifies the original judgments selected by the Supreme People s Court, examines their transformation into Guiding Cases, and explores the treatment of the Guiding Cases in subsequent cases.
2 2 I. The Process of Selecting Guiding Case No. 10 LI Jianjun v. Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd., A Corporate Resolution Revocation Dispute ( Guiding Case No. 10 or GC10 ) is one of the guiding cases ( GCs ) included in the third batch of GCs released by the Supreme People s Court ( SPC ) on September 18, Its original judgments are the (2009) Huang Min Er (Shang) Chu Zi No Civil Judgment rendered by the Huangpu District People s Court of Shanghai Municipality 2 and the (2010) Hu Er Zhong Min Si (Shang) Zhong Zi No. 436 Civil Judgment rendered by the No. 2 Intermediate People s Court of Shanghai Municipality. 3 This case was selected as a GC through the following process (see Chart 1): 4 1. On April 19, 2012, the Adjudication Committee of the Higher People s Court of Shanghai Municipality decided to recommend this case to the SPC for confirmation as a GC. 2. After research and discussion, the Office for the Work on Case Guidance of the SPC sent this case to the Second Civil Tribunal of the SPC for review and comment. The Second Civil Tribunal determined that this case could provide guidance in the adjudication of similar cases. On July 23, 2012, the Adjudication Committee of the SPC agreed to confirm this case as a GC. The SPC released the GC on September 李建军诉上海佳动力环保科技有限公司公司决议撤销纠纷案 (LI Jianjun v. Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd., A Corporate Resolution Revocation Dispute), STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT, English Guiding Case (EGC10), Nov. 9, 2012 Edition, 2 The first-instance judgment has not been found and may have been excluded from publication. Accordingly, these annotations focus on a comparison of GC10 and the second-instance judgment of the underlying case. 3 上海佳动力环保科技有限公司与李某某董事会决议撤销纠纷上诉案 (2010) 沪二中民四 ( 商 ) 终字第 436 号 (Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and a certain LI, An Appeal Case on a Board of Directors Resolution Revocation Dispute,(2010) Hu Er Zhong Min Si (Shang) Zhong Zi No. 436), STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT, Guiding Cases in Perspective TM, Guiding Case No. 10 Original Second-Instance Judgment, Apr. 30, 2016, 4 See 最高人民法院案例指导工作办公室 (The Office for the Work on Case Guidance of the Supreme People s Court), 指导案例 10 号 李建军诉上海佳动力环保科技有限公司公司决议撤销纠纷案 的理解与参照 (Understanding and Referring to Guiding Case No. 10, LI Jianjun v. Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd., A Corporate Resolution Revocation Dispute), 人民司法 应用 (THE PEOPLE S JUDICATURE APPLICATION), Issue No. 3 (2013). For the process of selecting Guiding Cases, see 最高人民法院关于案例指导工作的规定 (Provisions of the Supreme People s Court Concerning Work on Case Guidance), passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court on Nov. 15, 2010, issued on and effective as of Nov. 26, 2010, STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT, English Guiding Cases Rules, June 12, 2015 Edition,
3 3 Chart 1: The Process of Selecting Guiding Case No. 10 II. Comparison Between Guiding Case No. 10 and Its Original Judgment 1. Basic Facts of the Case Based on the Basic Facts of the Case section of GC10, the following table compares the similarities and differences between GC105 and the original second-instance judgment: Guiding Case No Original Second-Instance Judgment The court heard the case and ascertained: 1 Plaintiff LI Jianjun was a shareholder of defendant Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd. ( Jiapower Company ) and served as general manager. 2 Jiapower Company s shareholding structure was: 40% of shares held by GE Yongle, 46% by LI Jianjun, and 14% by WANG Taisheng. The three shareholders 5 李建军诉上海佳动力环保科技有限公司公司决议撤销纠纷案 (LI Jianjun v. Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd., A Corporate Resolution Revocation Dispute), STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT, Guiding Cases in PerspectiveTM, Guiding Case No. 10 Highlighted Edition, Apr. 30, 2016,
4 4 Guiding Case No. 10 together constituted the board of directors; GE Yongle served as the chairperson of the board of directors, and the other two were directors. (3)The articles of association stipulated: The board of directors exercises authorities including appointment and dismissal of the company s manager, etc.; board meetings shall be valid only when two-thirds or more of the directors are in attendance; decisions made at the board meeting on the matters discussed should be valid only when directors who constitute more than twothirds of all shareholders approve by voting. Original Second-Instance Judgment 2 3 (4)On July 18, 2009, GE Yongle, Chairperson of the Board of Directors, Jiapower Company, convened and presided over a board meeting, and the three directors were all in attendance. A resolution was made during the meeting, the contents of which stated in part: In view of the fact that General Manager LI Jianjun, without the board of directors consent, privately used company funds for stock speculation in the secondary market, resulting in a heavy loss, [the board] hereby dismisses him from the position of general manager, effective as of today. The resolution was signed by GE Yongle, WANG Taisheng, and the supervisor, while LI Jianjun did not sign. Plaintiff LI Jianjun claimed: The resolution that defendant Jiapower Company used to dismiss LI from his post as general manager was based on facts and reasons that could not stand, and the board of directors procedure for convening, its method of voting, as well as the contents of its resolution all violated the provisions of the Company Law. He requested that the court revoke the board of directors resolution in accordance with law. Defendant Jiapower Company defended its position, claiming: The board of directors procedure for convening, its method of voting, and the contents of its resolution all conform to the provisions of law and the articles of association, and therefore the board of directors resolution was valid. Overall, the Basic Facts of the Case section of GC10 is largely based on the original second-instance judgment. 2. Reasons for the Adjudication The Huangpu District People s Court of Shanghai Municipality rendered the first-
5 5 instance judgment: revoke the board of directors resolution made on July 18, 2009 by defendant Jiapower Company. Dissatisfied with the judgment, Jiapower Company appealed to the No. 2 Intermediate People s Court of Shanghai Municipality, which rendered a judgment: (1) repeal the above-mentioned civil judgment of the Huangpu District People s Court of Shanghai Municipality; (2) reject LI Jianjun s litigation claims. GC10 quite clearly provides the adjudication reasons of the No. 2 Intermediate People s Court of Shanghai Municipality, but there are still differences. Based on the Reasons for the Adjudication section of GC10, the following table compares the similarities and differences between GC10 and the original second-instance judgment: Guiding Case No. 10 In accordance with Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law of the People s Republic of China, reasons for which a board of directors resolution can be revoked include: (1) The procedure for convening violates laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association; (2) the voting method violates laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association; (3) the content of resolutions violates the articles of association. From the view of the procedure for convening, one could see that the board of directors meeting held by Jiapower Company on July 18, 2009 was convened by Chairperson GE Yongle, and all three directors were in attendance. The procedure of convening that board meeting did not violate the provisions of laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association. From the view of the voting method, one could see that, according to the provisions of Jiapower Company s articles of association, decisions on the matters discussed should be valid only when directors who constitute more than two-thirds of all shareholders approve by voting. The aforementioned resolution of the board of directors meeting was approved by the votes of two of the three shareholders (and directors); therefore the voting method did not violate the provisions of laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association. From the view of the contents of the resolution, one could see that Jiapower Company s articles of association provide that the board of directors has the right to dismiss the company s general manager. The contents of the board of directors resolution stating that General Manager LI Jianjun, without the board of directors consent, privately used company funds for Original Second-Instance Judgment Essentially the same, but merely states that the procedure used to convene the board meeting did not violate statutory procedures rather than provisions of laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association. (emphasis added) Essentially the same, but merely states that the voting method did not violate articles of association rather than provisions of laws, administrative regulation, or articles of association.
6 Guiding Case No. 10 stock speculation in the secondary market, resulting in a heavy loss were merely the reason for the board s dismissal of General Manager LI Jianjun, whereas the contents of the resolution themselves that General Manager LI Jianjun be dismissed did not violate the articles of association. Even if the reasons for the dismissal of General Manager LI Jianjun as stated in the board of directors resolution did not exist, this would not result in the revocation of the board of directors resolution. First, the Company Law respects corporate autonomy. Legal relations within companies, in principle, should be adjusted by corporate autonomy mechanisms and judicial organs, in principle, do not intervene in internal corporate affairs. Second, Jiapower Company s articles of association did not restrict the board of directors authority to dismiss the company s manager, and did not provide that the dismissal of the manager by the board must be based on particular reasons. The contents of the articles of association did not violate any compulsory provisions of the Company Law and should be regarded as valid; hence, Jiapower Company s board of directors could exercise the authority conferred by the articles of association to make the decision of dismissing the company s manager. Therefore, the court should respect corporate autonomy, and did not need to review whether or not there were reasons for which Jiapower Company s board of directors dismissed its general manager; this means that there was no need to review whether or not the facts on which the resolution was based were verified, and whether or not the reasons could stand. In summary, plaintiff LI Jianjun s litigation claims requesting revocation of the board of directors resolution could not stand and were rejected in accordance with law. Original Second-Instance Judgment Essentially the same meaning. Essentially the same, but without these expressions: respects ; Legal relations within companies, in principle, should be adjusted by corporate autonomy mechanisms and judicial organs ; and The contents of the articles of association did not violate any compulsory provisions of the Company Law and should be regarded as valid. Essentially the same, but without this expression: Therefore, the court should respect corporate autonomy. Overall, there are quite a few differences between the Reasons for the Adjudication section of GC10 and the original second-instance judgment. The analysis of these differences touches on the reasons for selecting the case as a GC, which are discussed below. III. Reasons for Selecting Guiding Case No. 10 In order to safeguard shareholders rights and interests, the provisions of the Company
7 7 Law of the People s Republic of China 6 (the Company Law ) concerning the means of remedy for corporate resolutions that violate laws, administrative regulations, or a company s articles of association have been gradually refined. Based on the different issues presented by corporate resolutions, Article 22 of the Company Law as amended in 2005 divided violative corporate resolutions into two types, namely those that are invalid and those that may be revoked. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 22, which remain unchanged in the current version of the Company Law, state: Where the content of a resolution [passed at] a shareholders meeting, shareholders general meeting, or [by] the board of directors of a company violates laws or administrative regulations, the resolution shall be invalid. Where the procedure for convening a meeting or the method of voting [used in] a shareholders meeting, shareholders general meeting, or [by a] board of directors violate laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association, or the content of a resolution [passed by the shareholders or the board] violates the articles of association, the shareholders may, within 60 days of the resolution s being made, request that the people s court revoke it. (emphasis added) Subsequently, on February 18, 2011, the SPC revised the Provisions on Causes of Action in Civil Cases to divide corporate resolution disputes into two types, namely corporate resolution validity confirmation disputes and corporate resolution revocation disputes. 7 With respect to corporate resolution revocation disputes, although Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law outlines the parameters of a courts review, there is still a certain amount of confusion in judicial practice. For example, GC10 involves the issue of how to conduct judicial review of the board of directors resolution dismissing the general manager. The SPC provides some clarification for the issue above through the Main Points of the Adjudication of GC10, 8 which read: A people s court, when handling a corporate resolution revocation dispute, should review: Whether or not the procedure for convening meetings and the method of voting violate laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association, as well as whether or not the content of the resolution violates the articles of association. On the premise that the aforementioned provisions have not been violated, whether the facts on which the resolution dismissing 6 中华人民共和国公司法 (Company Law of the People s Republic of China), passed and issued on Dec. 29, 1992, effective as of July 1, 1994, amended three times, most recently on Dec. 28, 2013, effective as of Mar. 1, 2014, Article 22, Paragraphs 1 and 2 remain the same in the latest amendment to the Company Law. 7 民事案件案由规定 (Provisions on Causes of Action in Civil Cases), passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court on Oct. 29, 2007, issued on and effective as of Feb. 4, 2008, amended on Feb. 18, 2011, effective as of Apr. 1, 2011, 8 See 最高人民法院案例指导工作办公室 (The Office for the Work on Case Guidance of the Supreme People s Court), supra note 4, at 49.
8 8 the general manager is based are verified and whether the reasons can stand are not within the scope of judicial review. According to the Office for the Work on Case Guidance of the SPC, GC10 has a strong guiding significance by clarifying the boundaries within which courts can conduct judicial review of corporate resolutions that may be revoked. 9 GC10 is also conducive to strengthening judges thinking on adjudication of commercial matters and encouraging companies to exercise autonomy in accordance with law under the conditions of the market economy. 10 Therefore, the case was selected as a guiding case. IV. Brief Comments With respect to the similarities and differences between GC10 and the original second-instance judgment and to the reasons for selecting the case as a GC, the authors have the following observations. 1. Guiding Case No. 10 Remedies the Shortcomings of the Original Second-Instance Judgment In this case, with respect to the procedure for convening meetings and the method of voting, although the court of second instance cited Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law to clearly point out that the court should review whether or not [they] violate laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association, the original second-instance judgment, as analyzed above, only vaguely mentions that they did not violate statutory procedures or did not violate the articles of association, without any explicit reference to the requirement that laws or administrative regulations should not be violated. GC10 remedies this shortcoming by clearly stating in the relevant parts of the Reasons for the Adjudication section that [t]he procedure of convening that board meeting did not violate the provisions of laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association and that the voting method did not violate the provisions of laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association. In addition, the second-instance judgment does not explicitly mention that judicial organs or courts should respect corporate autonomy. GC10 makes improvement in the Reasons for the Adjudication section by using expressions like [l]egal relations within companies, in principle, should be adjusted by corporate autonomy mechanisms and [t]herefore, the court should respect corporate autonomy. The Office for the Work on Case Guidance of the SPC explains: The core of the spirit of corporate autonomy is respect for the business judgment of the company and respect for the autonomous choices made, in accordance with law, by the company, the shareholder(s), and the director(s) Id. at 48. Id. Id. at 49.
9 9 The appointment and dismissal of the general manager concern the core and key decisions of a company s daily business operations. The adjustment of senior management by the company s board of directors based on the needs of the company s development is an exercise of the right to autonomy. 12 The relationship between the board of directors and the manager is generally understood in the legal field as a principal-agent relationship based on a relationship of trust. According to the legal nature of the principal-agent relationship, the board of directors has the right to dismiss at will. [The board of directors] may dismiss the manager at any time and the court does not need to review the reasons for dismissal. If the dismissal causes losses to the manager, except for the grounds that cannot be attributed to the company, the manager may claim separately that the company is liable for compensation There is Room for Improvement in the Reasons for the Adjudication Section of Guiding Case No. 10 (1) Article 22, Paragraph 1 of the Company Law should be considered first Article 22, Paragraph 1 of the Company Law provides: Where the content of a resolution [passed at] a shareholders meeting, shareholders general meeting, or [by] the board of directors of a company violates laws or administrative regulations, the resolution shall be invalid. Regarding corporate resolution revocation lawsuits, GC10 is deficient because it only mentions Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law, but fails to notice the logical connection between Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2 of the provision. In the authors opinion, before proceeding to the analysis of the board of directors resolution pursuant to Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law, courts need to first confirm whether the content of the resolution is in accord with the provisions of laws and administrative regulations based on Article 22, Paragraph 1. The reason is that if the content of a corporate resolution is in violation of the provisions of laws or administrative regulations, it is invalid and the court should directly confirm the invalidity of the corporate resolution. In this case, the court does not need to decide whether the resolution may be revoked in accordance with Paragraph 2. (2) The Legality of the Articles of Association Should be Considered First When Analyzing Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Company Law provides: Where the procedure for convening meetings and the method of voting [used Id. Id. at
10 10 in] a shareholders meeting, shareholders general meeting, or [by a] board of directors violate laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association, or the content of a resolution [passed by the shareholders or the board] violates the articles of association, the shareholders may, within 60 days of the resolution s being made, request that the people s court revoke it. The Main Points of the Adjudication of the GC10 are: A people s court, when handling a corporate resolution revocation dispute, should review: Whether or not the procedure for convening meetings and the method of voting violate laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association, as well as whether or not the content of the resolution violates the articles of association. On the premise that the aforementioned provisions have not been violated, whether the facts on which the resolution dismissing the general manager is based are verified and whether the reasons can stand are not within the scope of judicial review. In order words, on the premise that the content of the corporate resolution does not violate laws or administrative regulations (i.e., the requirements of Article 22, Paragraph 1 of the Company Law), courts need to review the following three aspects in reviewing whether the corporate resolution may be revoked: Whether or not the procedure for convening meetings violates laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association; Whether or not the method of voting violates laws, administrative regulations, or the articles of association; Whether or not the content of the resolution violates the articles of association. Both the original second-instance judgment and GC10 include analysis of the above three aspects. A company s articles of association is an important point of reference when making a determination on the above three aspects. Based on the logic above, a court may revoke a corporate resolution if the procedure for convening meetings, the method of voting, and the content of the resolution all do not violate the provisions of laws and administrative regulations, yet one of these three items violates the articles of association. However, if the relevant sections of the articles of association are themselves unlawful, should the court still revoke the resolution? The authors believe that the answer should be no. As a matter of fact, the Reasons for the Adjudication section of GC10 also mentions that [t]he contents of the articles of association did not violate any compulsory provisions of the Company Law and should be regarded as valid; hence, Jiapower Company s board of directors could exercise the authority conferred by the articles of association to make the decision of dismissing the company s manager. The bolded section is the expression missing in the original second-instance judgment. This shows that the SPC, when preparing this guiding case, realized that the legality of the articles of association is a
11 11 prerequisite for analyzing whether the content of the resolution violates the articles of association. Therefore, the authors believe that courts should first review whether the provisions of the articles of association relevant to the resolution are lawful before conducting review of the above three aspects. The Reasons for the Adjudication section of GC10 only mentions consideration of whether the provisions of a company s articles of association violate the [ ] Company Law. This scope of review is too narrow. The authors believe that courts should still review whether the content of the articles of association violates any other relevant laws and administrative regulations. Further clarification is also needed to confirm whether the scope of review should include departmental rules and local regulations.
Guiding Cases in Perspective TM 指导性案例透视
Guiding Cases in Perspective TM TM 指导性案例透视 LI Jianjun v. Shanghai Jiapower Environment Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd., A Corporate Resolution Revocation Dispute Guiding Case No. 10 (Discussed
More informationGuiding Cases in Perspective TM 指导性案例透视. Guiding Case No. 11: CGCP Annotations. April 30, 2016 Edition
Guiding Cases in Perspective TM TM 指导性案例透视 Dr. Mei Gechlik Founder and Director, China Guiding Cases Project Adrian Lo and Roland C. Reimers Editors, China Guiding Cases Project : CGCP Annotations April
More informationWANG Xinming, A Contract Fraud Case CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT
WANG Xinming, A Contract Fraud Case Guiding Case No. 62 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on June 30, 2016) CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT English
More informationShanghai Jwell Machinery Co., Ltd. and Retech Aktiengesellschaft, Switzerland, An Enforcement Reconsideration Case on an Arbitral Award
Shanghai Jwell Machinery Co., Ltd. and Retech Aktiengesellschaft, Switzerland, An Enforcement Reconsideration Case on an Arbitral Award Guiding Case No. 37 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee
More informationOU Zelin. Discussing the Guiding Case System with Chinese Characteristics By First Combining Guiding Case No. 1 with Adjudication Practices
OU Zelin Judge of the Second Civil Tribunal of the Dongguan Municipality No. 2 People s Court in Guangdong Province * Discussing the Guiding Case System with Chinese Characteristics By First Combining
More informationMAO Jianwen, CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT
MAO Jianwen, A Case of Refusing to Carry Out a Judgment or Ruling Guiding Case No. 71 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on December 28, 2016) CHINA
More informationThe Compilation and Application of China s Guiding Cases
Judge GUO Feng Deputy Director, Research Office of the Supreme People s Court Executive Editor-in-Chief, Case Guidance in China Honorary Adviser, China Guiding Cases Project of Stanford Law School The
More informationGuiding Case No. 53 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on November 19, 2015)
The Fuzhou Wuyi Sub-Branch of Fujian Haixia Bank Co., Ltd. v. Changle Yaxin Sewage Treatment Co., Ltd. and Fuzhou Municipal Administration and Engineering Co., Ltd., A Dispute over a Financial Borrowing
More informationLI Jianxiong v. Department of Transport of Guangdong Province, A Case About Open Government Information
LI Jianxiong v. Department of Transport of Guangdong Province, A Case About Open Government Information Guiding Case No. 26 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court
More informationMA Le, A Case About Using Nonpublic Information for Trading CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT
MA Le, A Case About Using Nonpublic Information for Trading Guiding Case No. 61 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on June 30, 2016) CHINA GUIDING
More informationGuiding Case No. 88 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on November 15, 2017)
ZHANG Daowen, TAO Ren, et al. v. The People s Government of Jianyang Municipality, Sichuan Province, A Case of Infringing Upon the Right to Operate Manpower Passenger Tricycle Businesses Guiding Case No.
More informationGuiding Cases Analytics TM
Guiding Cases Analytics TM TM 指导性案例分析 Dr. Mei Gechlik Founder and Director, China Guiding Cases Project Issue No. 2 (July 2014) Guiding Cases Analytics TM analyzes trends in the Guiding Cases selected
More informationGuiding Case No. 43 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on December 25, 2014)
Haikou Binhai Avenue (Tianfu Hotel) Securities Business Department of Guotai Junan Securities Co., Ltd., A Case of an Application for Compensation for Erroneous Enforcement Guiding Case No. 43 (Discussed
More informationGuiding Cases Analytics TM 指导性案例分析
Guiding Cases Analytics TM TM 指导性案例分析 Issue No. 3 (January 2015) Dr. Mei Gechlik * Founder and Director, China Guiding Cases Project * * * Guiding Cases Analytics TM analyzes trends in the Guiding Cases
More informationChina s Case Guidance System: Application and Lessons Learned (Part I)
Guiding Cases Surveys TM TM 指导性案例调查 Dr. Mei Gechlik Founder and Director, China Guiding Cases Project Chenchen Zhang Editor, China Guiding Cases Project Li Huang Editor, China Guiding Cases Project China
More informationSHA Mingbao et al. v. The People s Government of Huashan District, Ma anshan Municipality, CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT
SHA Mingbao et al. v. The People s Government of Huashan District, Ma anshan Municipality, A Case of Administrative Compensation for Compulsory Demolition of Housing Guiding Case No. 91 (Discussed and
More informationGuiding Cases SeminarsTM 指导性案例研讨会 TM
Guiding Cases SeminarsTM 指导性案例研讨会 TM SEMINAR SUMMARY CHINA S GUIDING CASES SYSTEM TURNS SIX: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT STANFORD CENTER AT PEKING UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 22, 2016* I. Overview On November 22,
More informationThe Changing Landscape of Environmental Litigation in China from the 1990s to 2016
The Changing Landscape of Environmental Litigation in China from the 1990s to 2016 Zhang Jingjing 张兢兢 Environmental Law Institute Visiting Scholar Center for Legal Assistance to Pollution Victims (CLAPV)
More informationWANG Lifeng. The Necessity and Function of China s Guiding Cases System
WANG Lifeng Professor of the Central Party School of the People s Republic of China The Necessity and Function of China s Guiding Cases System CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT October 15, 2013 () The citation
More informationTowards the Rule of Law: Judicial Lawmaking in China
Bond Law Review Volume 28 Issue 2 Article 3 2016 Towards the Rule of Law: Judicial Lawmaking in China Vai Io Lo Bond University, vlo@bond.edu.au Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr
More informationON BUILDING CHINA S NEW IP CASE SYSTEM: A DISCUSSION WITH CHINESE JUDGES LEGAL AND BIG DATA EXPERTS. Guiding Cases Seminars TM TM 指导性案例研讨会
Guiding Cases Seminars TM TM 指导性案例研讨会 SEMINAR SUMMARY ON BUILDING CHINA S NEW IP CASE SYSTEM: A DISCUSSION WITH CHINESE JUDGES AS WELL AS LEGAL AND BIG DATA EXPERTS STANFORD LAW SCHOOL October 19, 2017
More informationNinon Colneric. Guiding by Cases in a Legal System Without Binding Precedent: The German Example
Ninon Colneric Former Co-Dean of the China EU School of Law at the China University of Political Science and Law Former Judge of the Court of Justice of the European Communities Guiding by Cases in a Legal
More informationBelt & Road Typical Case 13: Towards a Liberal Interpretation of the Reciprocity Principle for Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
Issue No. 3 March 27, 2018 In Belt & Road Typical Case 13, 1 the Supreme People s Court (the SPC ) endorsed the liberal approach that the Intermediate People s Court of Nanjing Municipality, Jiangsu Province,
More informationNinon Colneric. Guiding by Cases in a Legal System Without Binding Precedent: The German Example
Ninon Colneric Former Co-Dean of the China EU School of Law at the China University of Political Science and Law Former Judge of the Court of Justice of the European Communities Guiding by Cases in a Legal
More informationBriefing Paper. A Brief Introduction to the Chinese Judicial System and Court Hierarchy. Yifan Wang, Sarah Biddulph and Andrew Godwin
Briefing Paper A Brief Introduction to the Chinese Judicial System and Court Hierarchy Yifan Wang, Sarah Biddulph and Andrew Godwin S The Briefing Paper Series is edited by Professor Pip Nicholson and
More informationStrategies for Trade Secrets Protection in China
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Volume 9 Issue 7 Spring Article 1 Spring 2011 Strategies for Trade Secrets Protection in China J. Benjamin Bai Partner, Allen & Overy, benjamin.bai@allenovery.com
More informationFRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA ARTICLE. FAN Xiaoliang, * LI Qingming **
FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA VOL. 10 JUNE 2015 NO. 2 DOI 10.3868/s050-004-015-0017-3 ARTICLE COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE LATEST PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW LEGISLATION ACROSS THE TAIWAN STRAITS
More informationCIETAC HONG KONG MOCK ARBITRATION. 29 September 2016 Beijing
CIETAC HONG KONG MOCK ARBITRATION 29 September 2016 Beijing WELCOME REMARKS Dr. WANG Wenying Secretary General, CIETAC Hong Kong Arbitration Center Secretary General, CMAC Hong Kong Arbitration Center
More informationPUSHING THE ENVELOPE: APPLICATION OF GUIDING CASES IN CHINESE COURTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF CASE LAW IN CHINA
Compilation 2017 Washington International Law Journal Association PUSHING THE ENVELOPE: APPLICATION OF GUIDING CASES IN CHINESE COURTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF CASE LAW IN CHINA Mo Zhang Abstract: The modern
More informationChinese Business Law. Chinese Legal System: Sources and Lawmaking in the People s Republic of China
Prof. Knut B. Pißler Research Fellow Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law Chinese Business Law Chinese Legal System: Sources and Lawmaking in the People s Republic of China
More informationGuiding Cases in Perspective TM 指导性案例透视. CHINA GUIDING CASES PROJECT Guiding Case No. 11 Highlighted Edition April 30, 2016 *
Guiding Cases in Perspective TM TM 指导性案例透视 YANG Yanhu et al., A Graft Case Guiding Case No. 11 (Discussed and Passed by the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People s Court Released on September 18,
More informationFRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA ARTICLE. ZHAO Yanrong *
FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA VOL. 12 JUNE 2017 NO. 2 DOI 10.3868/s050-006-017-0015-7 ARTICLE THE COURTS ACTIVE ROLE IN THE STRIVING FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN CHINA ZHAO Yanrong * Abstract In China, different
More informationChapter 2 An Overview of Shareholder Litigation
Chapter 2 An Overview of Shareholder Litigation 2.1 Introduction Shareholder litigation is traditionally perceived as being about compensating shareholders for infringements of their rights or for losses
More informationPart I PPH using the national work products from the NBPR
Procedures to File a Request to the SIPO (State Intellectual Property Office of the P R China) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program between the SIPO and the NBPR (National Board of Patents and
More informationSubmitted to the Committee on the Rights of the Child for its pre-sessional working group NOVEMBER 2012
Suggested questions and issues to be raised with the Chinese government in advance of the review of its third report on the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Submitted to the
More informationThe Anti-Monopoly Law: Still a Work in Progress
I. Introduction The Anti-Monopoly Law: Still a Work in Progress Paul Jones The adoption of the 中华人民共和国反垄断法 1 or Anti-Monopoly law (the AML ) on August 30, 2007 may yet turn out to be one of the more significant
More informationTHE CISG AND MODERNISATION OF CHINESE CONTRACT LAW
67 THE CISG AND MODERNISATION OF CHINESE CONTRACT LAW Shiyuan Han * This paper considers the impact of the CISG on the modernisation of Chinese contract law. The impact will be examined from a historical
More informationBeijing Intellectual Property Court. Judicial Protection Data Analysis Report (2015)
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Judicial Protection Data Analysis Report (2015) IPHOUSE Judicial Data Research Center Brief Introduction to the Editorial Organization Beijing IPHOUSE Network Technology
More informationArticle 37: The right to liberty of person under the Chinese constitution
China-EU Law J (2013) 2:35 67 DOI 10.1007/s12689-011-0002-9 ARTICLE Article 37: The right to liberty of person under the Chinese constitution Otto Malmgren Published online: 13 July 2011 The Author(s)
More informationChinese Business Law. Contract Law in China A Comparative Approach
Prof. Knut B. Pißler Research Fellow Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law Chinese Business Law Contract Law in China A Comparative Approach 1 Contract Law in the PR China:
More informationChina Environment Forum
China Environment Forum Woodrow Wilson Center Washington D.C. April 11, 2007 环境维权诉讼是促进公众参与环境保护的重要途径 The Litigation of Protecting Environmental Rights: An Important Route of the Public Participation in
More information跨境争议解决 Cross-border Dispute Resolution
www.dachenglaw.com 北京市东直门南大街 3 号国华投资大厦 5 层 /12 层 /15 层 (100007) 5/F, 12/F, 15/F, Guohua Plaza, 3 Dongzhimennan Avenue, Beijing 100007, China Tel: +8610-58137799 Fax: +8610-58137788 中国法通讯 China Law Newsletter
More informationPrivate securities litigation in China: Passive people's courts and weak investor protection
Bond Law Review Volume 26 Issue 1 Article 4 2015 Private securities litigation in China: Passive people's courts and weak investor protection Jin Sheng Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr
More informationAREAS OF RESEARCH AND TEACHING
Xin HE (Frank) School of Law, City University of Hong Kong; lwxin@cityu.edu.hk; 3442-7202 EDUCATION Doctor of the Science of Law (JSD), School of Law, STANFORD UNIVERSITY, 2004 Master of the Science of
More informationCausal Uncertainty in Chinese Medical Liability
Causal Uncertainty in Chinese Medical Liability Xiaowei Yu 1 Defining Causation in Chinese Tort Law Causation is an essential criterion of liability in Chinese tort law. In China, the statue directly applicable
More informationPiercing the veil of public policy in the recognition and enforcement of foreign-related awards in China
From the SelectedWorks of Haoqian Chen June 3, 2015 Piercing the veil of public policy in the recognition and enforcement of foreign-related awards in China Xiaochuan Han Haoqian Chen Available at: https://works.bepress.com/haoqian_chen/1/
More informationWhither the Next Chinese Judicial Reform on the Local Judiciary Challenging the Government Under the Judicial Context
Whither the Next Chinese Judicial Reform on the Local Judiciary Challenging the Government Under the Judicial Context Zhou Yu ABSTRACT Having noted the latest judicial reform proposal in China, this paper
More informationThe Dui Hua Foundation 450 Sutter Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA Tel: (415) Fax: (415)
450 Sutter Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94108 Tel: (415) 986-0536 Fax: (415) 986-0579 NGO Submission for the Universal Periodic Review of the People s Republic of China: Promoting Increased Transparency
More informationPolicy Forming Mechanisms in Rural China
Policy Forming Mechanisms in Rural China Ai-Jun Qiu China Center for Town Reform and Development Beijing, China 2008 CSD Working Papers No. 08-11 Campus Box 1196 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-9906
More informationThe New Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law An Overview
VIEWPOINT: The New Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law An Overview Adrian Emch and Qian Hao An eccp Publication November 2007 2007 Adrian Emch and Qian Hao. Published with permission by eccp. The New Chinese Anti-Monopoly
More informationFood Safety Governance and Its Reform in China
Food Safety Governance and Its Reform in China Song Hualin (Law Professor of Nankai Law School) About Me v Law Professor, Law School, Nankai University v Ph.D. in Constitutional Law and Administrative
More informationBriefing Note on China s Response to the Committee s List of Issues Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of the Child.
Briefing Note on China s Response to the Committee s List of Issues Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of the Child September 2013 The diverse and complex issues impacting on the rights of children
More informationCULPA IN CONTRAHENDO IN CHINESE CONTRACT LAW
CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO IN CHINESE CONTRACT LAW HAN Shiyuan Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 158 II. CHINESE LEGISLATION... 159 III. JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS AND CASES... 161 IV. LEGAL THEORIES... 165
More informationAct on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment (Act No. 113 of July 1, 1972)
この雇用の分野における男女の均等な機会及び待遇の確保等に関する法律の翻訳は 平成十八年法律第八十二号までの改正 ( 平成 19 年 4 月 1 日施行 ) について 法令用語日英標準対訳辞書 ( 平成 18 年 3 月版 ) に準拠して作成したものです なお この法令の翻訳は公定訳ではありません 法的効力を有するのは日本語の法令自体であり 翻訳はあくまでその理解を助けるための参考資料です この翻訳の利用に伴って発生した問題について
More informationChinese-Language Media Landscape
APPENDIX 3 Chinese-Language Media Landscape Official and Semi-Official Chinese-Language Media By 2018, all of the major official Chinese media outlets had embedded themselves deeply into the communications
More informationTHIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of this circular, you should consult a stockbroker or other registered dealer in securities, bank
More informationCOURT REFORM WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS
Compilation 2017 Washington International Law Journal Association COURT REFORM WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS Margaret Y.K. Woo Abstract: In Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail, Malcolm Feeley
More informationFRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA ARTICLE. LU Haina, HAO Wanyuan. nationality issues, Vietnam brides, reduction of statelessness
FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA VOL. 12 SEPTEMBER 2017 NO. 3 DOI 10.3868/s050-006-017-0023-0 ARTICLE PROTECTION OF STATELESS PERSONS IN CHINA: A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE LU Haina, HAO Wanyuan Abstract Statelessness
More informationCHINA S EVOLVING CASE LAW SYSTEM IN PRACTICE. Susan Finder* Table of Contents
CHINA S EVOLVING CASE LAW SYSTEM IN PRACTICE Susan Finder* Table of Contents I. CASE LAW PRACTICE...247 A. Judiciary...247 1. The Supreme People's Court... 247 2. Lower courts... 251 B. Procuratorate...253
More informationACCA F4 习题详解. Provided by Academy of Professional Accounting (APA) Corporate and Business Law (CL) 公司法和商法第四讲 ACCA Lecturer: Carrie Ni
Professional Accounting Education Provided by Academy of Professional Accounting (APA) ACCA F4 习题详解 Corporate and Business Law (CL) 公司法和商法第四讲 ACCA Lecturer: Carrie Ni ACCAspace 中国 ACCA 特许公认会计师教育平台 Copyright
More informationPRACTITIONERS PERSPECTIVE ON ADVANCES IN CHINA S JUDICIAL REFORM
PRACTITIONERS PERSPECTIVE ON ADVANCES IN CHINA S JUDICIAL REFORM Primary Author: Jacob Blacklock Contributing Authors: Christopher Fung, ZHENG Yang, ZHANG Shili, KONG Xingxing, WANG Yu, XU Hui** Table
More informationSocial Dialogue in Uganda The FUE NHO CEC Cooperation Eng. Martin S Kasekende Chairman FUE
Foto: Jo Michael Social Dialogue in Uganda The FUE NHO CEC Cooperation Eng. Martin S Kasekende Chairman FUE 1 Social Dialogue in Uganda: The practice It is based on ILO s principle of tripartism Tripartite
More informationCivil Execution Act ( Act No. 4 of 1979)
この民事執行法の翻訳は, 平成十九年六月二十七日法律第九十五号までの改正 ( 平成 2 0 年 12 月 1 日施行 ) について, 法令用語日英標準対訳辞書 ( 平成 20 年 3 月版 ) に準拠して作成したものです なお, この法令の翻訳は公定訳ではありません 法的効力を有するのは日本語の法令自体であり, 翻訳はあくまでその理解を助けるための参考資料です この翻訳の利用に伴って発生した問題について,
More information中国 英文 2 少年儿童 - 工作 - 统计资料 - 中国 -
图书在版编目 (CIP) 数据 中国妇女儿童状况统计资料 = Statistics on women and children in China. 2014 : 英文 / 国家统计局社会科技和文化产业统计司编. -- 北京 : 中国统计出版社, 2015.3 ISBN 978-7-5037-7383-9 Ⅰ. 1 中 Ⅱ. 1 国 Ⅲ. 1 妇女工作 - 统计资料 - 中国 - 2014 - 英文
More informationThe dissemination of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence
The Journal of International Studies No. 05, 66 8, 05 The dissemination of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence YUAN Zhengqing, SONG Xiaoqin Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy
More informationAct on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Business Operators (Act No. 52 of May 6, 1998)
この大学における技術に関する研究成果の民間事業者への移転の促進に関する法律の翻訳は 平成十七年法律第八七号までの改正 ( 平成 18 年 5 月 1 日施行 ) について 法令用語日英標準対訳辞書 ( 平成 19 年 3 月改訂版 ) に準拠して作成したものです なお この法令の訳は公定訳ではありません 法的効力を有するのは日本語の法令自体であり 翻訳はあくまでその理解を助けるための参考資料です この翻訳の利用に伴って発生した問題について
More informationISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2. Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - ISO/IEC Secretariat: ANSI
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N3271R DATE: 2007-07-10 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - ISO/IEC 10646 Secretariat: ANSI DOC TYPE: 2 nd Calling Notice Meeting 51 TITLE:
More informationISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2. Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - ISO/IEC Secretariat: ANSI
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N3271 DATE: 2007-05-23 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - ISO/IEC 10646 Secretariat: ANSI DOC TYPE: Calling Notice Meeting 51 TITLE: 1st
More informationFeeling China. An Exploration of Chinese Culture. Summer Chinese Culture Program July 7 July 25, Student Handbook. School of English Studies
Feeling China An Exploration of Chinese Culture Summer Chinese Culture Program July 7 July 25, 2014 Student Handbook School of English Studies Shanghai International Studies University School of English
More informationAntitrust Regulation of IPRs China s First Proposal
Competition Policy International Antitrust Regulation of IPRs China s First Proposal Adrian Emch (Hogan Lovells) & Liyang Hou (KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) 1 1 Introduction On June
More informationEmployment of Expatriates the Legal Issues
Employment of Expatriates the Legal Issues Garden Hotel Guangzhou 2 November 2011 Jeremy Sargent Managing Partner JSA Guangzhou Office LETS START WITH SOME SCENARIOS 1. Neil starts working with his company
More informationDOI /s Inheritance, Integration, Innovation: A Commentary on the General History of Chinese Education
Front. Educ. China 2015, 10(2): 330 337 REVIEW ESSAY DOI 10.3868/s110-004-015-0020-0 Inheritance, Integration, Innovation: A Commentary on the General History of Chinese Education 中国教育通史 [General history
More informationTHE THIRD-PARTY EFFECTS AND BURDEN OF PROOF FOR PATENT VALIDITY IN CIVIL LITIGATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TAIWAN AND THE UNITED STATES
THE THIRD-PARTY EFFECTS AND BURDEN OF PROOF FOR PATENT VALIDITY IN CIVIL LITIGATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TAIWAN AND THE UNITED STATES Fa-Chang Cheng * Associate Professor Graduate Institute of
More informationPrivate Antitrust Enforcement in China
Private Antitrust Enforcement in China I. Introduction Authored by Wei Tan * & Hao Zhan ** 1. Recent years have witnessed a rapid increase in private antitrust litigations in China. By the end of May 2014,
More informationConstruction Bulletin Hong Kong
Construction Bulletin Projects Procurement Construction Issue 7 July 2013 Welcome to the 7th Issue of our Bulletin. We start this issue with a focus on two perennial issues the back to back payment clause
More informationAdministrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China (2014 Amendment)[Effective] 中华人民共和国行政诉讼法 (2014 修正 ) [ 现行有效 ]
Please note: This translation is provided by www.lawinfochina.com with exclusive copyright and can not be reproduced for commercial use. Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China
More informationThe Multi-angle Perspective on the Doctrine of the Most Significant Relationship in the Practice of the Private International Law in China
From the SelectedWorks of Jiayi Geng June 25, 2015 The Multi-angle Perspective on the Doctrine of the Most Significant Relationship in the Practice of the Private International Law in China Hong Yun Tian,
More informationAct on Protection of the Names of Specific Agricultural, Forestry and
この特定農林水産物等の名称の保護に関する法律の翻訳は 平成二十八年法律第百八号までの改正 ( 平成 28 年 12 月 26 日施行 ) について作成したものです この法令の翻訳は公定訳ではありません 法的効力を有するのは日本語の法令自体であり 翻訳はあくまでその理解を助けるための参考資料です この翻訳の利用に伴って発生した問題について 一切の責任を負いかねますので 法律上の問題に関しては 官報に掲載された日本語の法令を参照してください
More informationREHABILITATING OR STRENTHENING THE U.S. PATENT THAT MAY BE DEFECTIVE OR VUNERABLE TO THIRD PARTY VALIDITY CHALLENGE
REHABILITATING OR STRENTHENING THE U.S. PATENT THAT MAY BE DEFECTIVE OR VUNERABLE TO THIRD PARTY VALIDITY CHALLENGE THREE EX PARTE PROCEDURES IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) AVAILABLE
More informationLEARNING LATIN AMERICA: China s Strategy for Area Studies Development
LATIN AMERICA AND THE WORLD JUNE 2018 LEARNING LATIN AMERICA: China s Strategy for Area Studies Development Margaret Myers, Ricardo Barrios, and Guo Cunhai* Introduction Chinese think tanks, such as the
More informationBurdensome Secrets: A Comparative Approach to Improving China s Trade Secret Protections
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 25 Volume XXV Number 2 Volume XXV Book 2 Article 6 2015 Burdensome Secrets: A Comparative Approach to Improving China s Trade Secret
More informationCharting a steady Course In a Turbulent world
Charting a steady Course In a Turbulent world Jonathan Holslag ESPO, Barcelona, June 2017 2030 2050 Mediterranean +82 +255 Intra-Europe +82 +205 North-Atlantic +74 +268 Asia-Med +104 +325 Table. Expected
More informationUnderstanding Socialized Liability Under Chinese Tort Law
VOLUME 59, SPRING 2018, ONLINE JOURNAL Understanding Socialized Liability Under Chinese Tort Law Chenglin Liu* ABSTRACT This article explores two unique aspects of the Chinese Tort Liability Law (TLL):
More information厦门大学学位论文原创性声明 本人呈交的学位论文是本人在导师指导下, 独立完成的研究成 果 本人在论文写作中参考其他个人或集体已经发表的研究成果, 均 在文中以适当方式明确标明, 并符合法律规范和 厦门大学研究生学 术活动规范 ( 试行 ) 另外, 该学位论文为 ( ) 课题 ( 组 ) 的研究成果,
学校编码 :10384 分类号密级 学号 :25520121154242 UDC 硕士学位论文 金龙公司在印尼的市场调查 Survey on Golden Dragon in Indonesian Market Prianto Indra 指导教师姓名 : 施雪琴 教授 专业名称 : 国际关系 论文提交日期 : 2 0 1 5 论文答辩时间 : 2 0 1 5 学位授予日期 : 2 015 年 4
More informationDevelopment and Growth without Property Rights in China s Transition Economy: Aijian Corporation & CITIC
Wellesley College Wellesley College Digital Scholarship and Archive Student Library Research Awards Archives 2018 Development and Growth without Property Rights in China s Transition Economy: Aijian Corporation
More informationSocialized Liability in Chinese Tort Law
HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 59, SPRING 2018, ONLINE JOURNAL Socialized Liability in Chinese Tort Law Chenglin Liu* ABSTRACT This article explores two unique aspects of the Chinese Tort Liability
More informationChina Approach to Combat the Wildlife Trafficking Wan Ziming Coordinator China s National Inter-agency CITES Enforcement Coordination Group (NICECG)
中国的野生动植物保护管理及履约执法工作 China Approach to Combat the Wildlife Trafficking Wan Ziming Coordinator China s National Inter-agency CITES Enforcement Coordination Group (NICECG) LEGISLATION China s Criminal Law
More informationWang Qisheng, Revolution and Counter-Revolution: Republican Politics in Social-Cultural
Wang Qisheng, Revolution and Counter-Revolution: Republican Politics in Social-Cultural Scope [ 革命与反革命 : 社会文化视野下的民国政治 ]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2010. Bin Ye, Shanghai Academy of Social
More informationReflecting on Development of Evidence Law in China
Reflecting on Development of Evidence Law in China Baosheng Zhang Abstract:Since 1978, Chinese evidence law has experienced significant changes and is now entering a rapid developmental stage prompted
More informationChina s Development Strategy 中国的发展战略
China s Development Strategy 中国的发展战略 Professor Li Zhongjie Member of CPPCC National Committee, Former Deputy Director of Party History Research Center of the CPC Central Committee 李忠杰全国政协委员 中共中央党史研究室原副主任
More informationNational Changhua University of Education Syllabus & Course Schedule
National Changhua University of Education 107-2 Syllabus & Course Schedule ( 留白 )body{font-size:12px;} Course: Foreign Policy Analysis Course Number: 78020 (1SPPC0131620) Instructor: 李毓峰 Credit: 2 Hour(s);
More informationOverseas Regulatory Announcement Announcement Resolutions of the Sixteenth Meeting of the Seventh Session of the Board of Directors
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness
More informationYI Yanyou TABLE OF CONTENTS
Can a Government Compulsorily Make Her Citizens More Free? Revisiting Non- Judicial Detentions Under the People s Republic s Administrative Regulations and Their Justifications YI Yanyou TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationLECTURE 5: CIVIL CONFLICTS AND WARS I 复旦大学 2014 年秋公共经济学研究兰小欢 1
LECTURE 5: CIVIL CONFLICTS AND WARS I 复旦大学 2014 年秋公共经济学研究兰小欢 1 Proportion Of Countries With Civil War Or Conflict, 1960-2006 SOURCE: BLATTMAN AND MIGUEL (2010) 复旦大学 2014 年秋公共经济学研究兰小欢 2 By Year: SOURCE:
More informationChina s Higher Education on a Overpass of 4 Fold Transitions
Challenges facing Asian Leaders in Higher Education and Necessity for a Regional Network of Universities for Innovation* China s Higher Education on a Overpass of 4 Fold Transitions - starting -Bbackground
More information深圳市海王英特龍生物技術股份有限公司 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
深圳市海王英特龍生物技術股份有限公司 SHENZHEN NEPTUNUS INTERLONG BIO-TECHNIQUE COMPANY LIMITED* (the Company ) (a joint stock limited company incorporated in the People s Republic of China) (Stock Code: 8329) TERMS OF REFERENCE
More informationTo amend the law relating to the registration of businesses in Hong Kong. (Amended 12 of 1985 s. 29(1)) Section: 1 Short title 30/06/1997
Chapter: 310 BUSINESS REGISTRATION ORDINANCE Gazette Number Version Date Long title 30/06/1997 To amend the law relating to the registration of businesses in Hong Kong. (Amended 12 of 1985 s. 29(1)) [6
More informationOrder for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures for the Promotion of New Energy Use, etc. ( Cabinet Order No. 208 of June 20, 1997)
この新エネルギー利用等の促進に関する特別措置法施行令の翻訳は, 平成二十年二月一日政令第十六号までの改正 ( 平成 20 年 4 月 1 日施行 ) について, 法令用語日英標準対訳辞書 ( 平成 20 年 3 月版 ) に準拠して作成したものです なお, この法令の翻訳は公定訳ではありません 法的効力を有するのは日本語の法令自体であり, 翻訳はあくまでその理解を助けるための参考資料です この翻訳の利用に伴って発生した問題について,
More information2009 ( 第七届 ) 跨国公司中国论坛 The 7 th Transnational Corporations China Forum 2009
Introduction of Transnational Corporations China Forum Organizing Committee: The annual Transnational Corporations China Forum has been hosted by Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation,
More informationARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF FUBON FINANCIAL HOLDING CO., LTD. [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Chapter I - General provisions
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF FUBON FINANCIAL HOLDING CO., LTD. [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Chapter I - General provisions Article 1 - Article 2 - Article 3 - The Company is organized in accordance with the Company
More information