Security for costs ; directions on appeal. Appeal from Acquittal - sexual assault causing bodily harm - is consent a defence?

Transcription

1 2001 A 01 Evaloakjuk Vertes, A 01 Arvaluk Richard, J. Costiga, A 02 Hore Veale, J. A 03 Ullikataq A 01 A 02 A 03 Tallis, Fraser, C. Corad, Mazhero v. Peltz Browe, J.A Applicatio to quash a committal for trial o a charge of first degree murder - No evidece o plaig ad deliberatio CC from the accused's acquittal o a charge of assault causig bodily harm. Appeal of 8 year setece for buggery, idecet assault complaiat BAN - Appeal from directed verdict of acquittal - Cout 1, sexual itercourse with a female uder 14 ; Cout 3, sexual assault Security for costs ; directios o appeal Mazhero v. G.N Browe, J.A Cotets of appeal book Fraser, C. Atagootak Costiga, Korgak Fraser, C. Costiga, Appeal from Acquittal - sexual assault causig bodily harm - is coset a defece? appeal of 12-year miimum parole ieligibility period Applicatio grated. Committal for trial o secod degree murder Appeal grated. New trial ordered. Cout 1 - verdict set aside ad ew trial grated ; Cout 2 - Appeal dismissed. Proper appeal books must be filed ; outstadig costs ad security must be paid before further actio may be take order that proper appeal books be filed Appeal grated ad ew trial ordered. grated; substituted 10- year parole ieligibility A 1 () A 2 () A 3 () A 4 () [2001] No. 3 [] No. 4 foud [] No. 6 foud foud [] No. 9 [] No. 4 Date 2001 u 3 12/01/2015 u 4 12/01/2015 u 5 12/01/2015 u 3 12/01/2015 u 8 12/01/2015 u 9 12/01/2015 A 3 12/01/2015 u 12 12/01/2015 A_JudgemetCitatio_Trackig

2 Fraser, C. appeal of 2d degree murder Costiga, covictio dismissed A 05 Korgak A 06 Arvaluk A 07 Ivalu Fraser, C. Tallis, Corad, Tallis, Hut. Appeal of acquittal reversal ad order for ew trial (A ) -- Sexual assault, s. 267(b) CC Crow appeal of setece for sexual assault Crow appeal of summary covictio acquittal - Sexual assault A 01 R. v. Miyok Schuler, Côté, Russell A 02 M.N Schuler youth trasfer to adult court A 03 T.J Christese Berger, Richard, J., Fruma, Fraser, C. Corad, Hudso, A 05 Shoo Costiga, Tallis, Corad, A 01 J.N Costiga, A 02 Evalik Crow applicatio to exted time for otice of appeal Crow appeal of setece - 5 moths + 2 years probatio for sexual assault Crow appeal of acquittal - sexual assault Crow appeal of coditioal setece for icest Decisio for ew trial affirmed Coditioal setece affirmed with extra coditios imposed appeal dismissed disagreed with judicial cosideratio but upheld trasfer deied Crow appeal allowed appeal allowed - ew trial ordered appeal allowed; 3 year setece imposed Richard, J., Costiga, J. Crow appeal of setece appeal dismissed A 5 () A 6 () foud foud A 2 () A 3 () A 4 () A 5 () A 1 () A 1 () [] No. 3 [] No. 11 [] No. 10 [] No. 6 [] No. 2 [] No. 10 [2000] No. 14 [] No. 11 [] No. 30 [] No. 31 Date u 10 12/10/2015 u 11 12/11/2015 u 7 12/01/2015 u 17 12/01/2015 u 2 12/01/2015 u 12 12/01/2015 A 4 12/01/2015 u 13 12/01/2015 u 14 12/01/2015 u 30, 12/01/2015 A_JudgemetCitatio_Trackig

3 A 03 Pudlat 18may05 orally, filed 29jul05 A 05 Hakugak Richard, J., Costiga, J. Tookaachiak Richard, Cote, Costiga, Richard, J. Crow appeal of coditioal setece for sexual ad spousal assaults Crow appeal of acquittal for sexual assault Appeal of covictio -- sexual assault - hearsay A 01 Qaqasiq Corad, Appeal of covictio A 02 Smith Tallis, A 03 A 01 Kooktook et al Vertes, Paeak Estate ad Daiska Estate v. Heli- Hut, Max + Berger, amedmet J. Tookaachiak Corad, O'Brie, appeal allowed; custodial setece of 2.5 years imposed after 6 moths credit for portio already served coditioally acquittal set aside ad guilty verdict etered Appeal allowed. Covictios quashed. New trial ordered. New trial orered o cout 6 oly. Crow appeal of setece - possessio of child porography - Crow requests coditioal setece rather tha probatio Fisheries Act, s. 72(3); Marie Mammals Regulatios, S.O.R./93-56, s.14 Crow appeal dismissed whether trial judge erred i rulig o scope of damages ad whether a estate ca sue for loss of expectatio of life ad loss of future judge's ruligs upheld ad wages appeals dismissed appeal of covictio for sexual assault uder Crimial Code s.271 appeal allowed ad ew trial ordered A 3 A 4 () A 5 () A 1 () A 2 () A 3 A 4 A 1 [] No.29 [] No. 14 [] No. 33 [] No. 28 [] No. 29 No.7 No.18 No.14 u 29 Date available u 31 12/01/2015 u 32 12/01/2015 u 34 12/01/2015 u 33 12/01/2015 u 9 12/01/2015 u 20 available u 15 available A_JudgemetCitatio_Trackig

4 A 02 A A Kitikmeot v. Cambridge Bay T. (B.) 04 Kukkik 23may07 orally; filed 25ju07 20sep07 orally; filed 22oct07 Corad, O'Brie, Corad, O'Brie, Marti, Watso, A 05 Tessier Watso, Marti, Watso, A 06 Akkuardjuk A 01 Koaha A 02 Jaw Charboeau, Marti, Watso, Johso, appeal of decisio that hamlet water by-law was i order; cross-appeal of decisio that by-law was discrimiatory appeal of setece for sexual assault Crow appeal of coditioal setece for sexual assault Crow appeal of acquittal ad setece Crow appeal of coditioal setece for assault Appeal from a setece - Spousal assault - Breach of probatio - s. 14 Charter - Iterpretator Appeal of first degree murder covictio - selfdefece - jury istructios hamlet water by-law was ot i order wrt discrimiatory applicatio; appeal allowed ad crossappeal dismissed setece upheld coditioal setece foud to be demostrably ufit; however due to time sice setecig, setece oly varied appeal dismissed for o error of law appeal allowed; accused ordered to serve remaider of coditioal setece i custody Charter breach deied - Setece deemed fit - sice appellat has complied with bail coditios sice date of release three years ago, setece was varied to time served appeal dismissed - 1 dissetig opiio A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 () A 1 () A 2 () No.15 No.16 [] No. 26 [] No. 27 [] No. 33 [] Nu. J. No. 10 [] No. 16 Date u 16 available u 17 available u 29 available u 30 available u 35 12/01/2015 u 10 available u 17 available A 03 M.(T.) v. N.(O.) Schuler, Berge, Costiga Childre s Law Act S.N.W.T C. 14, As Ameded, As Duplicated For Nuavut By S. 29 Of The Nuavut Act Appeal allowed A 3 () foud u 32 available- A_JudgemetCitatio_Trackig

5 A 01 Etuagat E.D. Johso A 02 NTI v. Caada Louise Charboeau; Jack Watso; Fras Slatter Appeal from a setece imposed o September 30,,by The Hoourable Justice R. Foisy The issue o this appeal is whether the Govermet of Nuavut should be a defedat i this litigatio, or whether it is sufficiet that the Govermet of Nuavut be a third party deied A 1 () A 2 () [] No. 9 [] No. 14 Date u 9 available u 14 available A 03 Diavik Diamod Mies Ic. v. Tahera Diamod Corp Robert Maria Papery,Bruc e McDoald The Miers Lie Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1997, c. M-12 (the Act ), which applies i Nuavut pursuat to s. 29 of the Nuavut Act, S.C. 1993, c. 28 exists, like all lie legislatio, to protect the commercial iterests of those who supply materials ad labour to projects covered by the Act...The appellats here, two of five lie claimats i a diamod mie kow as the Jericho Mie, seek a differet approach to priority uder the Act. They say that the commo law priority rule of first i time, first i right should apply ad that those lies first registered uder the Act should be first i priority. The applicatio of that rule would give the appellats priority over all but oe other lie claim. A 3 () [] No. 24 u 26 available A_JudgemetCitatio_Trackig

6 Date Mazhero v. Nuavut (Commissioe r) R.G Kilpatrick The parties to this appeal have bee uable to agree o the cotets of a appeal book i relatioto appeal file o CAP. The Court ow itervees to settle this issue. The appellat is directed to prepare ad file his appeal books i accordace with this directio ad rule 29(3) of the Nuavut Rules of the Court of Appeal Respectig Civil Appeals. Writte submissios oly A 4 () [] No. 26 u 27 available A_JudgemetCitatio_Trackig