Friday the 31st January 2014 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL) DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR FRIDAY 31/01/2014 (FROM 10:30 A.M. To 16:30 P.M.)

Transcription

1 1 of 8 Print Friday the 31st January 2014 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL) DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR FRIDAY (FROM 10:30 A.M. To 16:30 P.M.) (THIS CAUSE LIST IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) No Case No Party Detail Advocates Remarks 1. MA SMT.MANGTIN BAI VS. SANWATDAS AND FRESH MATTERS AMAN KESHARWANI,KAMAL PANDEY [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL HAS FILED BARRED BY 454 DAYS WITHOUT APPLICATION US 5 OF LIMITATION ACT. 2. RELEVANT DATE OF IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND CASE NO. OF THE TRIAL COURT HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX. 3. EXCEPT TO SIGN. OF THE ADVOCATES NOTHING HAS MENTIONED IN VAKALATNAMA. ] 2. MCC TIKARAM (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH LRS HIRALAL SAHU AND VS. KEHAR SINGH (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH LEAGAL REPRESENTATIVE TARANJEET SINGH AMIT VERMA,ASHISH SHRIVASTAVA,AFROJ KHAN,ANIMESH VERMA [FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. RELEVANT CASE NO. HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2. C.C. OF ORDER IMPUGNED HAS NOT FILED AS PER INDEX. 3. COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS HAS NEITHER FILED VAKALATNAMA IN S.A NOT IN INSTANT MCC APPL. 4. CERTIFICATE OF M.C.C. HAS NOT FILED. 5. DATE HAS NOT MENTIONED IN MEMO OF APPEARANCE.] (WITH SA 46091) 3. SA SAVITRI BAI VS. BHOI AND ANR SAMIR SINGH,ANIL GULATI,PALLAV MISHRA,DINESH KUMAR PRASAD MUNGELI [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. STATUS OF BOTH OF THE COURTS BELOW HAVE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE PARTIES HAVE NOT MENTIONED IN VAKALATNAMA.] 4. SA SURENDRA KUMAR AND VS. BALMUKUND AND AMAN KESHARWANI,KAMAL PANDEY [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL HAS FILED BASRRED BY 173 DAYS WITHOUT APPLICATION US 5 OF LIMITATION ACT. 2. BOTH OF ANNEXURES HAVE NOT MARKED AS PER INDEX. 3. STATUS OF THE COURT BELOW HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX. 4. WHO HAD PUT T.I. ON VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY IDENTIFIED. 5. EXCUTION DATE AND OTHER RELEVANT PARTICULARS HAVE NOT MENTIONED IN VAKALATNAMA.] 5. EP SMT.SAROJA MANHARAN RATHORE PRADEEP SAKSENA,PANKHURI SAXENA VS. DR.KHILAWAN SAHU AND [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. VAKALATNAMA IS NOT SIGNED BY THE PETITIONER. 2. REGISTRED ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS IS NOT FILED INCOMPLIANCE OF RULE 292 OF THE C.G. HIGH COURT RULES CERTIFICATE IS NOT SIGNED BY THE PETITIONER. 4. COURT FEE OF RS IS NOT AFFIXED IN MEMO OF PETITION. 5. COPIES OF NOTICE OF ORDINARY THROUGH DISTRICT JUDGE WITH TALWANA FORM IS NOT FILED WITH THE MEMO OF PETITION AS PER RULE 300(3) OF THE C.G. HIGH COURT RULES POSTAL STAMP OF RS IS NOT AFFIXED IN ENVOLOP OF THE NOTICE COPY OF RESPONDENT NO COPIES OF NOTICE FILED THROUGH RAD FOR RES. NO. 2 TO 13 SAME IS NOT SIGNED EVERY PAGES BY THE PETITIONER AS ORIGINALLY.] 6. REVP92014 DASHARATH LAL VS. RESEARCH OFFICER QAULITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT AND ATANU GHOSH,ADITYA KUMAR [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. PETITION IS FILED BARRED BY 29 DAYS WITHOUT APPLICATION US 5 OF LIMITATION ACT.]

2 2 of 8 7. MAC SMT. SARITA SHRIVASTAVA & ORS DHARMESH SRIVASTAVA,C.P.LAHREY BALOD VS. B.S. DEWANGAN & ANR [ FOR DEFAULT OF ; 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 105 DAYS FOR WHICH APPLICATION US 5 OF LIMITATION ACT HAS NOT FILED. 2. ONE ADVOCATE HAS NOT PUT HIS SIGN. IN VAKALATNAMA.] 8. MAC BRANCH MANAGER SRI RAM GENERAL DEEPAK GUPTA,AKHILESH KUMAR INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. RAIPUR VS. SMT.BHARTI SHARMA AND [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. IMPUGNED CASE NO. & STATUS OF THE COURT BELOW (TRIBUNAL) HAS NOT PROPERLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE.] 9. MAC SITARAM NAYAK AND VS. SAI CHEMICALS TEDESARA AND ANR. G.V.KUTUMBA RAO,ASHISH GUPTA,QAMRUL AZIZ RAIGARH [ FOR DEFAUTL OF : 1. REQUISITE C.F. HAS NOT PAID ON APPLICATION US 5 OF LIMITATION ACT. 2. APPELLANT NO. 2 HAS NOT PUT HER SIGN. ON VAKALATNAMA. 3. T.C. HAS NOT MARKED IN EXTRA SETS ON APPEAL.] 10. ARBA82014 MS SWETA CONSTRUCTION 388 VS. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (SERVICES ) & ORS ALOK TIWARI,PARAG KOTECHA [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. C.C. ATTESTED NOTARIES COPY OF ANNEXURE A1 HAS NOT FILED BUT WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX. 2. COURT FEE OF RS IS DEFICIT ON MEMO OF APPEAL.] 11. WPS LAXMAN THAPA T.K.TIWARI,SMT. K. TIWARI,ADITYA KHARE [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) CONTENT OF PARA NO OF PETITION IS WRONGLY MENTIONED. ] 12. WPS SANTOSH NAG [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) ANNEXURE P2 WRONGLY FILED. ] PRIYANKA MEHTA,MANOJ PARANJPE,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,VIKRAM DIXIT 13. WPS HEMANT KUMAR GARDI AND VIMLESH BAJPAI,NIRUPAMA BAJPAI,SHRAWAN KUMAR CHANDEL,VIVEK SHARMA,KRISHNA KUMAR DEWANGAN [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COPY OF PETITION WITH ALL ANNEXURES NOT SERVED TO RESPONDENT NO. 6 AS PER RULE 47(I) C.G. HIGH COURT RULES (2) PAGE NO. 14 AND 16 ARE NOT CLEAR BUT TYPED COPY OF SAME FILED WITH THE PETITION. ] 14. WPS OMPRAKASH JAISWAL RAJESH KUMAR KESHARWANI [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) DATE OF ORDER OF ANNEXURE P10 IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX. (2) PAGE NO. 14 & 15 ARE FAINT & TYPED COPY OF THE SAME ARE NOT FILED. ] 15. WPS PREM SINGH MANDALE AND RUCHI NAGAR [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) NAME OF PETITIONER NO. 5 IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF PETITION AS PER ANNEX. P2, P5 AND P6 AND VAKALTANAMA. ] 16. WPS SHASHANK BHUSAN DUBEY AND A.K.YADAV,VIKAS PANDEY [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) FATHERS NAME OF THE PETITIONERS NO. 7,12,17 & 27 ARE NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. ] 17. WPS KARMDEV RAM BHAGAT AND A.K.YADAV,VIKAS PANDEY [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) FATHERS NAME OF THE PETITIONER NO. 4 TO 8, 22,23,25,27,29,32,36,38,39 AND 44 ARE NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. ] 18. WPS MANOJ KUMAR DHRUV VS. STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS ATUL PANDEY,DEEPALI PANDEY,UMA PALI

3 3 of 8 [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) ADDRESS OF RESP. NO. 2 NOT MENTIONED COMPLETELY IN CAUSE TITLE OF PETITION. (2) DATE OF ANNEX. P3 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX & PARA NO. 8.2 OF MEMO OF PETITION. (3) CONTENTS OF ANNEX. P4 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 8.2 OF MEMO OF PETITION.(4) W.P. NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 8.3 OF MEMO OF PETITION. ] 19. WA HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTN.LIMITED AND VS. V.N.UNNITHAN AND VINOD DESHMUKH ASSTT.S.G. [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) MEMO OF APPEAL NOT SIGNED BY SHRI VINOD DESHMUKH COUNSEL FOR APPEALLANTS. ] 20. WPC SMT.KIRAN PANDEY VS. RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED AND NEHA VERMA,V.K.PANDEY,T.R. CHANDRAKAR,SHAILENDRA SHUKLA (CAVT),RITU MISHRA(CAVT),A.SEN GUPTA(CAVT)ADITYA KHARE(CAVT),NOOTAN RATHORE(CAVT), MAMTA SHRIVASTAVA(CAVT.),SHAILJA SHUKLA(CAVT.), NAINI JHA (CAVT.), MUKTA TRIPATHI(CAVT.) [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF LAND ACQUISITION PROCEEDING NOT FILED WITH THE PETITION. (AS PER RELIEF SOUGHT COLUMN PARA NO. 10.2) {ALONGWITH CAVT. NO } 21. WPC KHEMRAJ JAISWAL & ORS PRIYANKA MEHTA,MANOJ PARANJPE,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,VIKRAM DIXIT,SUSHI SAHU (RESP. NO. 3) [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) AS PER SUBJECT MATTER AND RELIEF SOUGHT CLASSIFICATION OF INSTANT PETITION WRONGLY DONE AS WPC INSTEAD OF WPS. (2) DATE NOT MENTIONED IN MEMO OF PETITION AND CERTIFIED. (3) COPY OF PAGE NO. 18 IN HAND WRITTEN TYPED COPY NOT FILED. (4) COPY OF ANNEX. P9 IS FAINT AND TYPED COPY OF SAME NOT FILED WITH THE PETITION. (5) PAGING NOT DONE IN THE INDEX. (6) REPRESENTATION (ANNEX. 14) NOT FILED WITH PETITION AS PER INDEX AND PARA NO OF PETITION. (7) SOME PORTION OF ANNEX. P3 AND P10 ARE UNDERLINE. (8) ARTICLE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE PAGE NO. 3 OF PETITION. ] 22. WPC MS INDFAB PROJECT PVT. LTD. VS. BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMP. LTD. & ANR. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,GOVIND DEWANGAN [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) CONTENTS OF ANNEX. P1 & P2 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX AS PER ENCLOSED DOCUMENT. ] 23. WPHC42014 AKHILESH KHANDELWAL RENU SINGH,THAKUR ANAND MOHAN SINGH,ANANT BAJPAI,SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT,SHAILENDRA DUBEY (RESP. NO. 8) [ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) RESP. NO. IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE PARA NO. 3 OF PETITION. (2) COPY OF ANNEX. P1 IS FAINT IN SPARE PART OF PETITION AND FILED ONLY TYPED COPY OF PAGE NO. 13. ] 24. CRA VIJAY KUMAR & ORS SHARMILA SINGHAI,SANJAY AGRAWAL,UPASANA MEHTA JASHPUR [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED IN THE CASE. ] 25. CRA SANDRESH KUMAR A.K.YADAV,VIKAS PANDEY SURGUJA (AMBIKAPUR) [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. US WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS AND CAUSE TITLE. 2. FATHERS NAME COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. ] 26. CRA RAMNATH PATEL JANAK RAM VERMA,SANTOSH SAHU [FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COUNSEL NAMELY SHRI O.P.YADAV & SHRI SANTOSH K.VERMA HAS NOT SIGNED THE MEMO OF APPEARANCE WHOSE NAME MENTIONED IN MEMO OF APPEARANCE. 2. ANNEX. NOT MARKED AT PAGE NO. 10.] 27. CRR SMT. NANDKUMARI VS. RAMKUMAR METRA U.R.KOSHALEY [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ] 28. MCRC SHAMSHER BAHADUR SINGH V.G.TAMASKAR [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. NAME OF ADVOCATE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT. 2. DATE OF ARREST WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS & CAUSE TITLE. ]

4 4 of MCRC OMPRAKASH AND ANR. JANAK RAM VERMA,SANTOSH SAHU BALODA BAZAR [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. B.A. NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2. COURT BELOW CASE NO. AND NAME NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. SOME COUNSEL NAME MENTIONED IN VAKALATNAMA BUT NOT SIGNED. ] 30. MCRC CHHABIRAM GILHARE G.M.HASAN,VIKRAM SINGH [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. PRAYER NOT SIGNED BY COUNSEL. 2. NATURE OF CASE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. PLACE NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. ] 31. MCRC SUNIL KUMAR SINGH VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY,RAJESH RANJAN SINHA [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. OFFENCE US OR IPC. COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2. OFFENCE US OF IPC WRONGLY AND INCOMPLETELY MENTIONED IN PARA NO INFORMATION OF CO-ACCUSED WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER REPORT OF FILING CLERK. 4. APPLICANT NAME NOT MENTIONED IN MEMO OF APPEARANCE. ] 32. MCRC SANTOSH KUMAR BEHRA MALAY KUMAR BHADURI,SAREENA KHAN [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION NOT MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER HIGH COURT RULES. ] DURG 33. MCRC KEHAR GORELAL SHIVENDRA BHARDWAJ,ARUN KUMAR RAJPUT,G.P.MATHUR KAWARDHA (KABIRDHAM) [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. ORDER DTD. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX, SYNOPSIS, CAUSE TITLE & PARA NO. 02. ] 34. MCRC D.N.PRAJAPATI,MOHD. TARIQ HAIDER SURAJPUR [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. INFORMATION OF CO-ACCUSED WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT. 2. RELATIONSHIP WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 04. ] 35. MCRC SUJEET KUMAR JAISWAL PARAS MANI SHRIWAS KORBA [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. DATE OF ARREST WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS AND PARA NO US WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE AND PARA COURT BELOW CASE NO. NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 4. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER FILING CLERK REPORT. 5. APPLICANT SURNAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN MEMO OF APPEARANCE. ] 36. MCRC HARISH CHAND CHELAK PUNIT RUPAREL [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER FILING CLERK REPORT. ] 37. CRMP SUDHAKAR GANSHYAM ANIL KUMAR,AMIT KUMAR,LOKESH KUMAR SINGH [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. CRIME NO. NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PROSECUTION ALONG WITH CHALLAN NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 3. COPIES OF STATEMENTS OF PROSECUTION WITNESS NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 4. COPY OF FIR. NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ] 38. CRMP ZILA ANTVYAVSAYI SAHAKARI VIKAS VIJAY K.DESHMUKH,GOPI JAISWANI SAMITI MARYADIT VS. JAGDISH MEHAR [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF COMPLAINT & OTHER EXHIBITED RELEVANT DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. ] 39. CRMP CHHATTISGARH RAJYA VIDDUTTA M.D.SHARMA,C.D.SHARMA,PRITAM TIWARI VITARAN COMPANY LTD. VS. SHRI RAJESH SAHU [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. NATURE OF CASE & CASE NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE APP. FOR ACQ. APPEAL. ] 40. CRMP AJIT SINGH BHOGAL VS. SMT.ANJU BERAGI (SUPERINTENDENT) MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,JYOTI RATHORE,APURVA THAKUR,MANJU AGRAWAL [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF STATEMENTS & OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS NOT FILED IN THE CASE. ]

5 5 of WP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PANC.DURG VS. KAILASH RAM PATEL & DEFAULT MATTERS S.RAJPUT, SAI SUMANA BHADURI,AJAY SHARMA,PRASUN KUMAR BHADURI,KSHITIJ SHARMA [ FOR DEFAULT SHRI PRASUN BHADURI AND HIS ASSOCIATES HAVE FILED WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION WITH VAKALATNAMA ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER WITHOUT OBTAIN N.O.C. FROM PREVIOUS COUNSEL. ] 42. WP THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH &,SURESH TANDAN VS. PARGHANIYA RAM & [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATE AMENDMENT HAS NOT BEEN INCORPORATED BY COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER AND CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION IS NOT FILED.] 43. WP RAIPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS. SMT.GAJRA BAI & AJIT SINGH,,ALOK RANJAN SUR,B.P.SHARMA [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT 1. NON PAYMENT OF P.F 2. P.F PAID FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1 WITH WRONG ADDRESS. 3 APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY NOT FILED AND AMENDED PETITION FILED DELAY ] 44. WPC BRIJLAL MISHRA VS. SUBHASH KUMAR SHUKLA & RAMESH CHAND SHUKLA, VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY, VINEET KUMAR PANDEY, YK.PANDEY [ FOR DEFAULT ADDRESS NOT MENTIONED LRS OF 1(F) & THAT OF (D) HAS BEEN MENTIONED TWICE (2 DIFFERENT ADDRESS) IN APP. FOR SUBSITUTION OF LRS.(I.E. I.A.02) ] 45. SA LAXMINATH YADAV VS. NAZUL OFFICER AND OTHERS,R.N.PUSTY,BASANT KAIWARTYA BASTAR(JAGDALP UR) [ FOR DEFAULT OF COPY OF SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW IS NOT ATTACHED IN P.F. FILED ON ] WR. 46. WP N.V. SUBBA RAO & VS. PRESIDENT KENDRIYA KAR.GR.NI.SA.&,N.L.SHRIVASTAVA,AJAY SHRIVASTAVA,SOMKANT VERMA,ANUP MAJUMDAR,BASANT DEWANGAN [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT I.A. 2 APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING TYPED COPY OF ANNEXURE IS FILED WITHOUT AFFIDAVIT BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3 AND A.R. (J) ORDER DATED ] 47. WPS PRADEEP KUMAR JANWADE AMALPUSHP SHROTI,,ANUP MAJUMDAR,BASANT & DEWANGAN,ASHISH CHAUDHARI, HASAN ALI, UTKAL PRADHAN, ALI ASGAR (INTERVENOR), JITRNDRA PALI VARUN SHRAMA (CAVEATER) PRAFULL N. BHARAT, KESHAV DEWANGAN, MAYANK CHANDRAKAR.,SOURABH DANGI,MANOJ PARANJPE,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,K.RAMAN NAIR [ FOR DEFAULT EDITOR PAPER BOOK NOTE DTT (1) PAGE 4 NOS , 60,63,98-99,115,117, , ,166, ,380, AND 392 OF THE PAPER BOOKS ARE FAINT IN ALL SETS IF THE PAPER BOOK. (2) IN THE PAGE NOS. 29 T0 403 OF THE PAPER BOOKS, PREVIOUS NUMBERING HAS NOT BEEN ERASED. ] 48. MCC DURGESH KUMAR GANGOTRI SOMSUKLA SARKAR & [ FOR DEFAULT AS PER O.N. DATED 20114; 1. R.NO. 4 HAS EXCLUDED IN MAKING PARTIES IN CAUSE TITLE AS PER C.C. IMPUGNED.] (WITH WP ) 49. MCC PRADEEEP ENMANUAL ROBINSON SOMSUKLA SARKAR VS. ADDL. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER & [ FOR DEFAULT AS PER O.N. DATED 4114 : 1. PARA NO. 2 AND PRAYER OF DELAY APPLICATION IS INCOMPLETE. ] (WITH WP ) 50. SA SMT.KHEMABAI VS. DULAURIN BAI AND P.K.TULSYAN,AKHILESH DALPATI BALOD [ FOR DEFAULT OF OFFICE NOTE DTD : 1. CASE HAS NEITHER PAGINATED IN INDEX NOT IN DOCUMENTS. 2. REQUISITE C.F. HAS NEITHER PAID ON IMPUGNED JUDGMENT NOT ON DECREE (A1). 3. PLAINT OF APPEAL HAS FILED WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW. 4. NAME OF R.NO. 1 HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN APPLICATION FOR IR. 5. RELEVANT DATE OF IMPUGNED JUDGMENT HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS AND AR(J) ORDER DTD ] AR(J) [ NEXT WEEK ORDER ]

6 6 of SA SMT.JAGBAI AND VS. SHIVKUMAR JAISWAL AND MANOJ KUMAR JAISWAL,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL RAIGARH [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT NO. 3 AS PER O.N. DATED : 3. BELOW THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO. 2 HAS MENTIONED THAT DELETED THE NAME BUT HER NAME HAS BEEN MENTIONED IN MEMO OF APPEAL.] 52. SA SMT.SAVITRI DEVI VS. HORILAL CHANDEL AND H.S.AHLUWALIA,G.S.AHLUWALIA,RAVINDRA AGRAWAL RAJNANDGAON [FOR DEFAULT AS PER O.N. DATED : 1. VAKALATNAMA IS NOT SIGNED BY SHRI RAVINDRA AGRAWAL COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT. 2. PAGE NO. 33 TO 71 ARE FAINT AND HAND WRITTEN. 3. PAGE NO. IS NOT FILED WITH ANNEXURE A2.] 53. COMP FORBES & COMPANY LIMITED VS. EVO TECH PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED D.L.DEWANGAN,ABHISHEK SINHA,GHANSHYAM PATEL [FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT THAT PF PAID IN TIME BUT FORMAT NO. 45 NOT ATTACHED WITH THE PF] 54. MAC SMT. NAMITA HANS & VS. BASANT KUMAR PASWAN & SANJAY PATEL,G.V.KRISHNA RAO,SURESH VERMA,ANIL GULATI NK THAKUR,BHASKAR PAYASHI KORBA [ FOR DEFAULT OF NON SUBMITTING CORRECT ADDRESS ON P.F. FILED ON AS PER C.O. DTD AND AR(J) ORDER DTD ] WR. 55. MAC SMT. VANDANA SINGH & ORS VS. BALRAM PRASAD & ORS SMT. BHAGWATI KASHYAP,,N.P.CHANDRAVANSHI [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT THAT PF PAIN IN TIME BUT COPY OF ANNEXURES NOT ATTACHED WITH THE PF ] WR 56. WPS SANJAY KUMAR JAIN NAYAN KUMAR CHATTERJEE,MUKESH SHRIVASTAVA [ ON DEFAULT OF :- 1. AFFIDAVIT NOT IDENTIFIED BY THE WITNESS IN PAGE NO OFFICE NOTE DATE & A.R.(J) ORDER DATE & ] 57. WPS SUDERSHAN PRASAD YADU NAYAN KUMAR CHATTERJEE,MUKESH SHRIVASTAVA [ ON DEFAULT OF:- 1. AFFIDAVIT NOT IDENTIFIED BY THE WITNESS, AND COURT FEES RS. 02 IS NOT FILED IN THE SAME ( PAGE 131) & OFFICE NOTE DATE & A.R.(J) ORDER DATE & ] 58. WPS KESHKANT SINHA NAYAN KUMAR CHATTERJEE,MUKESH SHRIVASTAVA [ ON DEFAULT OF:- 3. AFFIDAVIT NOT IDENTIFIED BY THE WITNESS IS PAGE NO. 138 & OFFICE NOTE DATE & A.R.(J) ORDER DATE & ] 59. WA RAJENDER SINGH (ARORA),AMIT VERMA,ANIMESH VERMA,ASHISH SHRIVASTAVA,AFROJ KHAN,ANURAG VERMA,JITENDRA PALI,VARUN SHARMA,AMAN KESHARWANI,BHAVANA PALI [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATE P.F. AND COPIES HAS NOT BEEN FILED AND DELAY APPAL. HAS NOT BEEN FILED.] {WITH WPC P.B.} {ALONG WITH CAVT NO } 60. CRMP NANAK CHAND VS. SMT.NISHA MINAKSHI BAGHEL AND ANR. RAVINDRA AGRAWAL [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. TYPED COPY OF ANNEX. P2 & P3 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ] JANJGIR-CHAMPA 61. CRMP MS PARLE PRODUCTS PVT.LTD. AND ANR. RAVINDRA AGRAWAL SURGUJA (AMBIKAPUR) [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. TYPED COPY OF HAND WRITTEN PAGE NO. 20 TO 33, 35 TO 40, 42 TO 45, 48 TO 50 & 52 TO 55 HAS NOT BEEN FILED IN THE CASE. ]

7 7 of ACQA RAM KISHUN YADAV SUNIL SAHU SURGUJA (AMBIKAPUR) [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF THAT COUNSEL HAS NOT FILE P.F. WITH DELAY APPLICATION ] 63. CONT MS AMAR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS. SHRI D.K. PRADHAN & ORS RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT,ARUN KOCHAR,RENU KOCHAR [ FOR DEFAULT NO. 1 AS PER O.N. DATED 17114: 1. REQUISITE C.F. HAS NOT AFFIDAVIT ON ANNEXURE C5. ] 64. MAC SMT.TIL BAI AND ANIL GULATI,SAMIR SINGH VS. DINESH KUMAR YADAV AND [ FOR DEFAULT NO. 1 AS PER OFFICE NOTE DTD : 1. APPEAL FILED BARRED BY 01 DAYS APPLICATION IS NOT FILED AND AR(J) ORDER DTD ] 65. MAC BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS. SAMPATSINGH NAG AND SUDHIR AGRAWAL,PRASANJEET DUTTA,JYOTI AGRAWAL BASTAR(JAGDALP UR) [ FOR DEFAULT AS PER O.N. DATED 16114: 1. AFFIDAVIT HAS NOT FILED IN SUPPORT OF STAY APPLICATION. 2. PARTIES NAMES HAS NOT MENTIONED IN CERTIFICATE.] 66. MAC GANESH VISHWAS VIPIN KUMAR TIWARI,GIRIJA SHANKAR SINGH DURG VS. SUNDAR LAL SAHU AND [ FOR DEFAULT AS PER O.N. DATED : 1. VALUATION OF THE APPEAL HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 06 DAYS FOR WHICH APPLICATION US 5 OF LIMITATION ACT HAS NOT FILED.] 67. WPS SMT.REKHA KHURANA ANR. PUNIT RUPAREL [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. COPY OF PETITIONER ALONGWITH ALL ANNE NOT SERVED TO RES NO.2 AS PER RULE 47(i) OF CG HIGH COURT RULES PARA NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED AFTER PARA NO. 04 IN MEMO OF PETITION AND A.R.(J) ORDER DATED ] 68. WPS DILIP KUMAR DIWAN VS. GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI UDELA AND ANR. KISHORE NARAYAN,RAJNI SOREN [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. COPY OF ANNE P1 AND P4 ARE HAND WRITTEN AND TYPED COPY OF SAME NOT FILED WITH THE PETITION AND A.R.(J) ORDER DATED ] 69. WPC NARENDRA TIWARI VS. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AND ANR. SHAILENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. PROPOSED TIME TABLE IS NOT FILED WITH ANNE P2 AS PER INDEX & MEMO OF PETITION & AR(J) NOTE DTD ] 70. CRR ARUN KUMAR PATEL ROOP NAIK,MANJU NAIK,ABHISHEK SHARMA RAIGARH [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COURT FEES NOT AFFIXED IN PAGE NO. 7 & PAGE NO. 38 & 39 NOT READABLE BUT TYPED COPY FILED. 3. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT FILLED UP PROPERLY. ] 71. CRR SMT. PRIYANKA TIWARI ANORS VS. ARUN TIWARI RISHI RAHUL SONI,VIKRANT PILLAY SURGUJA (AMBIKAPUR) [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 3. CERTIFIED ORDER COPY OF ANNEX. A1 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ] 72. MCRC ANNU PANIKA DHEERENDRA PANDEY [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF- 1. OFFENCE US OF SCST. ACT WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE & PARA NO CASE NO. & PENDING CASE IS LEARNED COURT BELOW NAME NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. OFFENCE US OF SCST. ACT NOT MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS. 4. SAME COPY OF AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED IN SPARE COPY OF PART II & PART III. ] C.O. [ AAW ] 73. MCRC SUNDER LAL RAJWDE RAHUL MISHRA,JEET PATEL [ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF- 1. BAIL REJECTION ORDER COPY OF LEARNED COURT BELOW NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ] C.O. [ AAW ] BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

8 8 of 8 Sd- (RAJESH SHRIVASTAVA ) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (J)